by Peter Eyre

Middle East Consultant

April 2010

from PalTelegrahp Website

 

Contents

  1. Part - The Link to the New World Order

  2. Part - The Satanic New World Order

  3. Part - New World Order Military Plans

  4. Part - New World Order Breaches UK Constitution

  5. Part - New World Order Breaches UK Constitution

  6. Part - New World Order Breaches UK Constitution - Sedition and Treason

  7. Part - New World Order Threats, Neglects

  8. Part - Leaders Put Their Own Countries at Risk

  9. Part - British Senior Politicians Put UK at Risk

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Part 1

The Link to the New World Order
02 April 2010

 

This heading may appear alarming to some people but is there a hidden master plan?

 

Is it possible that some aspects of this has already started and if so how and who is involved. We hear so many times of the so called “New World Order" and the “Illuminati” but does it actually exist? What ever you want to call this elite organization one can say with some certainty that it does certainly exist.

 

I also find it incredible that this relatively small group can change the course of history and we the millions may have no power to stop it.

So where does this start and who is involved?

 

In my opinion mass depopulation is already well underway with the use of weapons containing uranium components. It all started back in the Balkans and has progressively worked its way via Kuwait - Iraq - Afghanistan - Lebanon - Gaza - Pakistan and soon Yemen and Somalia.

But let’s turn back the clock and see when the aggressive use of “Dirty Weapons” really started. As I said previously the war in Balkans was the initial testing grounds for these weapons but something significant had to happen to allow the New World Order to move forward.

 

Obviously 9/11 kick started a series of events that has now become part of the “New World Orders Master Plan.

 

In my opinion 9/11 was a total conspiracy and a very carefully planned Mossad operation, with of course the full support of certain figures within the US and elsewhere. I will cover this conspiracy in more details later on in the series

Doesn’t it appear strange that some of the most powerful people in the world are members of the Freemasons and yet I feel that there are others much further up the ladder that pull the strings of these puppets. The ones at the top of the pyramid are the supper rich elite who control the finances of the world and thus have control of the world. You may be surprised to learn who some of these key players are and what this means to the majority of us who live on this planet. I will cover this aspect in another part.

So this “False Flag Conspiracy” called 9/11 gave these evil satanic minded people the justification to go to war whilst at the same time allowed them to spread fear into the hearts and minds of their respective populations. Perhaps, you the public are not totally convinced that 9/11 was a conspiracy, hopefully before the end of this series you will be!

Whilst talking about 9/11 as to who did what or how such a huge structure managed to collapse like a pack of card, let’s just ask the question,

  • Why have so many emergency teams became acutely sick and may succumb to cancer?

  • Besides the controlled explosions that took place, what could cause this ever increasing list of casualties and why is the US Government moving so fast to keep this out of court?

  • Could it be that depleted uranium also became part of this scenario?

A fund has been raised by the Federal Reserve for between 10,000 - 70,000 workers who will be offered a share in the $657 million payout. The deal however does come with an ultimatum that no one takes out a lawsuit.

 

One should also ask the question,

how many more people in the New York area have become victims of 9/11?

So to move on, you may ask the question who would want to depopulate in mass and how is it possible to do this without we the people knowing it is taking place? How could this be achieved over a period of time? Has this process already started and when did it start?

To find the answers we have to go back to the original nuclear tests that were carried out at Los Alamos. It must be clearly understand that back in 1943 nuclear experts were discussing the advantages of using fine dust as a weapon.

 

One such document was issued on the 30th of October 1943 which quoted,

“It is recommended that a decision be obtained from competent authority authorizing additional work pertaining to the use of radioactive materials in order that this country may be ready to use such materials or be ready to defend itself against the use of such materials”.

This same document contained information as follows:

2. As a gas warfare instrument the material would be ground into particles of microscopic size to form dust and smoke and distributed by a ground-fired projectile, land vehicles, or aerial bombs. In this form it would be inhaled by personnel. The amount necessary to cause death to a person inhaling the material is extremely small. It has been estimated that one millionth of a gram accumulating in a person's body would be fatal. There are no known methods of treatment for such a casualty.

Two factors appear to increase the effectiveness of radioactive dust or smoke as a weapon.

 

These are:

  1. It cannot be detected by the senses

  2. It can be distributed in a dust or smoke form so finely powdered that it will permeate a standard gas mask filter in quantities large enough to be extremely damaging

This document gave the background to today’s weapons that are not only highly effective in there ability to penetration deep into the target but also the pyrophoric qualities of this product allows it to ignite spontaneously and create a huge cloud of fine DU dust that becomes a lethal airborne aerosol.

The documents relating to the above are held by the Palestine Telegraph and the header of the original memorandum is shown here below to prove its authenticity:

Although in more modern times we give reference to its usage in the Balkans the experimental side of using Depleted Uranium (DU) Weapons actually stemmed back to the war between Israel and Egypt (Yom Kippur War) in October 1973.

 

The US gave Israel new weapons that contained DU and also sent over their own specialist to train the IDF in the usage of such weapons. Unknown to the IDF at the time this was the start of what would become a progressive contamination of the many areas of conflict and the world.

Coming back to the late 1900’s we can now see the dramatic changes that have taken place in the Balkans with extremely high level of cancer and other symptoms that directly relate to the weapons used containing uranium components. Small villages and towns are running out of burial space as the toll continues to climb.

Iraq is another classic case of a country that has had it genetics possibly altered forever and in some locations the women are now being asked not to have children. But the problem does not remain there. It is on going with dramatic increases in many forms of cancers, diabetes, mental disorders, infertility etc.

 

One could see a dramatic decline in the population of Iraq within a reasonable time frame.

Afghanistan is another major problem area where contamination is manifesting itself on a much larger scale owing to the excessive usage of uranium based weapons. They are currently encountering the same birth defects we have seen in Iraq and it will only be a matter of time before they also are asked not to have children in certain areas.

 

The main problem is that the half life of Depleted Uranium for example is 4.5 billion years and so it is passed down the line from sibling to sibling.

Now we can turn to Gaza, the latest victim of US and IDF dirty weaponry. The IDF used a vast array of weapons with heavy usage of weapons that contained both DU/EU components. This was both before, during and after “Cast Lead.”

 

Birth defects are increasing in Gaza to almost double that of the previous year. Gaza’s Health Minister, Dr Bassem Naim, said the study of the biological samples proved that the Israelis used internationally prohibited weapons against the Palestinians. He warned that the large percentage of toxic uranium in the territory would pose a real threat to future generations.

So what do these evil planners have in mind for the residents of planet Earth? How could this be carried out and who would be the chosen few?

 

It is obvious that the first victims in the current stand off would be Israel and Iran who would form part of the initial stages of their plan. The US encourages conflict between the two and really would prefer Israel to carry out the first strike. Israel would then basically become the sacrificial lamb by launching an attack on Iran (with the assistance of the US).

 

This action would then cause Iran to carry out a reprisal attack, not only on Israel but also possibly on other US Military/Civilian targets in the Middle East, such as Bahrain.

Within a very short period of time the US would then counter attack on a massive scale and very carefully bring NATO onboard (an attack on one is an attack on all) setting the Middle East on fire. One would expect the use of Nuclear Weapons or certainly weapons that have uranium components on a scale not seen before in the Middle East. This would be a contained Nuclear War confined to the Middle East only.

 

However, the radiation fall out from such an event would be catastrophic to the populations of the entire Middle East, including Israel itself and the world beyond. One would assume that China would eventually intervene and back Iran and even possibly Russia which could turn this regional war into a full scale WW3.

Whatever the final outcome it is clear that the genetics of the entire Middle East would fall victim to depleted uranium and we could expect to see a dramatic rise in many forms of cancer, diabetes, infertility, birth deformities and deaths.

There would remain one big problem for the US and the West and that is the question of China and Russia and what new alliances would be formed. China is becoming a formidable super power with a sound economic infrastructure. In actual fact the investment rate by China is extremely impressive with major shares in the US and Western Economies. The potential rise of China into becoming the next super power must send shock waves throughout the US.

As we have already seen during the Chemical and Biological Warfare trials in Rhodesia and then down in South Africa it is possible for these evil satanic people (The New World Order) to design a weapon or introduce some form of Chemical or Biological means of eliminating an entire race.

 

In South Africa they designed the “Black on Bomb” which was intended to stop blacks from having children.

 

With all the current and past technology one could see the US/West promoting something that would target the DNA of only those of Chinese descent. Alternatively they may introduce a virus that would have devastating consequences on such a densely populated country as China.

There is still a distinct lack of trust between the US - Russian and China and one can understand why when the US continues to establish its missile defense systems to what it says is to protect itself from any Iranian attack when it is clearly a defense system against Russia.

 

It is evident that the cold war has never finished.

 

Add to this the struggle by both parties to secure and dominate vital energy markets and one can see that no change is on the horizon.

Whatever the plan you can be rest assured (for those that remain) it will be a world of total subservience to our respective governments.

 

One can clearly see a trend that would allow each country to become a police state with almost every government, local government and there respective partnerships having the ability to monitor and control you. Parking inspectors, rangers and more of those cardboard policemen, Police Community Support Officers (PCSO’s) for instance, would be given greater power with added extensive CCTV coverage to keep you in check.

The New World Order would only allow selected people to receive advanced education leaving the rest to remain uneducated and therefore unable to fight the system.

 

Many would remain unemployable and everyone would be totally dependent on the state for health care and survival.

 

The New World Order would encourage the splitting up of the family unit, thus breaking down a sound social system. It would encourage the use of drugs and alcohol and in allowing this to happen would make us all a population of zombies who would not dare challenge the system and who would do everything that is asked of them.

What makes this whole situation frightening is the fact that the US lost at least three nuclear weapons and the UK lost another three. One would ask the question how is this possible. The answer is very easy… when you obtain such weapons under the table you are not in a position to totally secure them or advertise the fact that you have lost them…they basically do not exist.

I guess you would now ask the question…

”I have heard this story before…how can it possibly be true”?

The answer is simple:

For every deal there has to be witnesses and middlemen, there has to be those who put in a tender for the movement of such weapons, how to move them, people who become signatory to the deal and someone has to be ultimately responsible for making sure they are safe to transfer, inspected pre departure and inspected prior to releasing the final payment upon delivery etc.

As one can imagine no government is going to openly declare that due to their neglect nuclear weapons went missing.

 

One could also clearly see that to this day the US, UK and Israeli Government are still frantically trying to locate them. Israel alone would be in the forefront of this search knowing that many countries are now against them.

 

I guess one would also assume that if the people in the US knew the truth behind 9/11 they also could become an enemy to Israel.

In the same way if they knew that the attack on the USS Liberty was an intentional act of aggression by Israel on a US Military vessel it would certainly cause a rift in US - Israel relations.

The problem here is that so many turmoil’s and false flags are planned by so many different agencies and authorities simultaneously. You have the New World Order who are basically capitalist at the highest level with what some people say are connected to a much higher group called the Illuminati (Jesuits).

 

The elite are then connected down the line with Freemasons, Christian Zionist and Jewish Zionist.

 

Many of these groups have the same initial goal but with a totally different view point on the final outcome. Another issue that has come to light is the fact that many of the Jewish communities living in such places as the US, UK and Australia, who appear to be good citizens of their host country (by swearing allegiance), are in actual fact very much attached to Israel in a powerful nationalistic way i.e. they would rather go and serve their time in the IDF than join the military of the country where they live.

What appears to be the major cause of many conflicts is the insecurity that Israel feels with those that live around them.

 

If at any stage Israel feels threatened by any country in the region they and their lobby groups immediately embark on a campaign to take some sort of action or wage war. The sheer size of their military alone is beyond normal comprehension. One could certainly see why Israel would want to create a false flag in order to justify an action.

 

They currently have operatives in Somalia and Yemen and one would hate to imagine what they have up their sleeve. Lets not forget the Israeli air-strikes that were carried out in Sudan last year in direct breach of sovereignty…but I guess they are a rule unto themselves anyway.

One can also see amongst this complicated array of manipulators an extremely powerful Pro Israeli Lobby Groups who offer vast sums of money to potential political candidates or parties in return for the indirect manipulation of a countries policy that favors Israel. The top of the list must surely be The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in the US.

 

These powerful groups almost have the ability to write bills for Congress. They also have the power to squash anything that the Israelis could consider as being against their best interests or that could do damage to their country. On example of this being the Goldstone Report which is now in the balance as a direct result of AIPAC interference and their influence in Congress.

 

The power they wield via the members that they have funded or continue to fund makes them an extremely powerful and dangerous group. They are also supported by the US Friends of Israel, EU Friends of Israel, Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrats Friends of Israel in the UK.

 

How can one say with sincerity that any political party is truly representative of its people?

One final point before closing Part 1 is the fact that we have a United Nations that basically has no strength whatsoever, despite the number of nations that created it…it is a tool by which it’s Security Council decides the fate of any nation. For some time now this Security Council appears to have another member who does not qualify to sit at the table of the elite and yet is consulted on all matters… That country is Germany.

We started to see this involvement when Obama, Brown and Sarkosy last met in the US and handed out some pretty strong words to Iran… I refer to this group as the G3.5.

 

Today we see Brown and German Chancellor Angela Merkel's agreeing on sanctions against Iran…can one believe the audacity and arrogance of these people forming alliances and making decisions outside of the United Nations.

 

It becomes clear that the New World Order is showing its fangs and when the time comes it will tell the UN what they had already pre decided…interesting hey?

 

Back to Contents




 



Part 2

The Satanic New World Order
07 April 2010

 

I and many other writers have talked about the New World Order (NWO) but who are they and just how far will they go to achieve their goals? The answer to that question is they will go as far as they need to go to reach their objectives…if that entails killing thousands of people then so be it.

 

The NWO are certainly satanic and they will create any amount of “False Flag” operations to justify a military outcome.

The list is endless...

  • USS Liberty

  • USS Cole

  • US Embassy and Hotel in Kenya

  • failed attack in Somalia

  • Oklahoma bombing

  • numerous attempted High Jacking’s (including Detroit)

  • current operations in Yemen

  • the fictitious Al Qaeda and the top of the list 9/11 which was a total conspiracy...

...one could also add to this the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and more recently the man made Swine Flu!


Maybe you are shocked to read this as you would probably be also shocked to know that our countries are being taken over by these mad men. The term sovereignty has almost totally disappeared from our dictionary and replaced by this relatively small group of evil and greedy warmongers who seek to control the world and its natural resources.


I will leave the 9/11 conspiracy for the final part of this series and just focus on who are the NWO and what are their ambitions. Before moving on however we have to fully understand the historical attempt to bring about the NWO in the 1950’s. Many people today were not aware of this carefully orchestrated failed attempt that existed during the “Cold War” years.

 

They started off with NATO and then added CENTO to cover the Middle Eastern Region and finally SEATO to cover Asia and the Far East To some extent you will see the resurrection of this same plan creeping back into our lives to this day and again that will be another article owing to its complexity.


We can see that these plans keep coming and going and it is only the intelligence of the people who manage to stop it or slow it down. I am sure that this is the case at the moment and that the NWO want to accelerate their program but unfortunately they are now probably ten years or so behind their master plan.

 

It is their intention to have all the respective populations living in a type of police state and becoming totally subservient to their respective governments. They only want a few selected individuals to become educated to a very high level and the rest to be left by the wayside.


They want us to be totally dependent on the state both in the health and social sense and one day we may find ourselves walking around with a “Chip and Pin” planted under our skin as Aaron Russo once said. They do not believe in the family unit as this creates harmony and therefore they prefer single parents.

 

They encourage the use of drugs and may even one day tax them.

Basically the NWO want a population of “Zombies” who will do exactly what they want them to do.

 

In order to better understand the workings of this terrible elite group, one should look at the interview with Aaron Russo before he died of lung cancer.
 

I would never have imagined that one day I would be talking about conspiracies and the New World Order.

 

My life was full of the beauty of this world… nature… wildlife or just simply finding myself on a mountain, deep within a jungle or forest and listening to nothing but the sounds of nature. Sometimes we all have a purpose in life and that may come late when we are least expecting it. For me it was spending time in a remote part of Southern India, helping poor tribal people, from that moment I started this journey.

 

What happened to me is beyond words but one thing I can say for sure is that once you start this journey you cannot stop.


There is not a day goes by without thinking how terrible it was to read a particle story and say to yourself how evil... but then you read more and more and the horrors just keep flowing out. One has to fully understand that there is no limit to the level of evil and killing people in mass is purely a routine for them. They openly declare the necessity to depopulate on a huge scale.

 

We the public have to remain on guard and fully understand that the world has lost its direction and imagination and only we the people can stop the advancement of the NWO.


As I have already discussed in Part 1 of this series they have already started their mass genocide with a concentrated program in the Middle East.

 

They have to date directly attacked the genetics of Kuwait, Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Gaza with their extensive use of depleted and enriched uranium weapons and that has now extended on to Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen.

The use of these weapons is totally indiscriminate and therefore the entire region is being contaminated by these radioactive aerosols.

 

Most of the weapons are from the US and are used by all NATO partners as well as the Israeli IDF (who are also manufacturing their own). I am amazed that the entire Arab League just watch this happen and say nothing, even though they themselves are also at the receiving end and will eventually succumb to its toxicity. Needless to say the people of Israel are now victim to their own weapons.


So who are these people who inflict these terrible crimes against humankind?

 

They are the same group of people that were behind the planned collapse of the world’s financial markets? They are the same group of people who intentionally caused the collapse of major banks and businesses so that when the dust had settled they could walk amongst the carcasses of dead companies and snap up a good deal. They are the same group that took all the tax payers money and within a year were operating again with massive profits.

 

They basically cleared their debt, the governments got their money back but as usual the poor taxpayers never get theirs back but rather end up paying a very big IOU for the next 5 - 10 years… sound familiar?


The New World Order includes many of the world's wealthiest people, the British Crown, top political leaders, and the corporate elite. They aim to create a fascist type one world government, stripped of nationalistic and regional boundaries, that is obedient to their agenda. Their intention is to completely control every human being and at the same time reduce the world’s population by around 5.5 billion people.

 

Some say the early days of the NWO in the US may have started on Jekyll Island, Georgia, when back in 1910 some of the elite gathered to talk about the formation of the Federal Reserve Bank So who are the principal organizations, institutions, and individuals who make up this evil satanic NWO web?


The Illuminati is at the top of the pyramid which is an ancient bloodline of extremely rich families that make up the core of the “New World Order.”

 

Their purpose to create A One World Government and one-unit monetary system, under permanent control of self elected members from their own numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population.

There will be no middle class, only rulers and the servants.

 

All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national boundaries shall exist.

The system will be on the basis of a welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simple be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them.

 

Privately owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited.


Behind this vast web of the wealthy elite is a programmed army who basically form part of a huge mind control program that has the ability to interact via the mother to an unborn child... I realize that this may sound totally way out to many readers but if you take the time to research yourself then you can draw up your own conclusions.

 

Some of these mind control programs have a name such as Monarch and MK Ultra.

 

Most governments have a very carefully scripted propaganda designed to obtain a desired behavioral response from the public. Public opinion polls are taken on a regular basis with the intent of finding out the public's acceptance of this Illuminati's planned program. A strong showing in the polls tells the Illuminati that the program is working or a poor showing tells the NWO manipulators that they have to do more work on the program in order to get the desired response.

AFalse Flag” operation such as 9/11 or the so called attempted airline bomb in Detroit is typically a way of not only spreading panic amongst the population but also a way of taking an action that basically needs a justification. Any “False Flag” operation or conflict is drawn out onto the world stage by the controlled media who show use photos and video reports of horrific and bloody atrocities suffered by innocent civilians.

 

This has the desired response when the public cry out that something has to be done.


The governments then step up their next phase into bringing in more controlled security measures that basically and slowly converts the country into a police state. Please understand that the word “Terrorism” or “The Axis of Evil” forms part of their vocabulary but in the real sense does not truly exist.

 

One has to understand that the “Axis of Evil” is the NWO.


The 9/11 conspiracy was a typical case of justification that then allowed the NWO to start implementing its plans to take over the natural resources of a country whilst at the same time spreading radiation aerosols amongst its population to attack the very DNA of its residents.

 

The War in Afghanistan served two purposes it allowed the NWO to take control of the security of the Opium trade and also to facilitate the TAPI pipeline to run through the Southern heart of Afghanistan and onwards to the very lucrative oil/gas markets of Pakistan, India and possibly China.

I was happy to see that despite the extremely strong briefs carried out by the US in Pakistan and India, not to go for the Iranian pipeline (IPI), common sense prevailed and now Pakistan and India will take the pipeline from Iran.

 

This has enraged the US who desperately needed this market for their own imperialistic greed. One can clearly see that the war in Afghanistan is not going completely the way the NWO had wanted and now only leaves them with the opium (which is still extremely lucrative) and is the backbone of the NWO.


We can now see an accelerated program spear headed by the US, UK, France, Germany and Israel to carry out an attack on Iran at the earliest possible opportunity. The truth is that in a way they are a little scared as to who will initiate this attack as it is distinctly possible that Iran already has a nuke (compliments of the missing nukes that the US and UK lost some years ago).

 

That terrible mistake involved the US and UK Government’s undermining the United Nations in hiding the fact that South Africa had made 10 ready to use Battlefield Bombs (all under the radar).

 

The assassination of dear Dr. David Kelly forms part of this story which we can include in another article.


This terrible mistake cost millions of lives and involved David Cameron, along with two buddies (whom we will just refer too as KW - Now a Knight - and DW). The trio between them earned the Conservative Party (under Thatcher), a huge backhander to the tune of 17.8 million pounds, needless to say the illustrious Mark Thatcher (Maggie’s son) was also involved.


One should also add to this the knowledge and secrets that Tony Blair and Gordon Brown shared on this topic. Tony Blair also received one million pounds from a well known Formula One promoter.

 

We can now start to understand that the Iraq Inquiry was an absolute farce and allowed both to walk away with the arrogance one would expect from members of the New World Order.

Sorry, I drifted off the topic a little there so now to get back on track and see who else forms part of this NWO?

 

International bankers and the big pharmaceutical companies as well as other major multinational corporations are the backbone of the establishment as are the Royal Family of England (House of Windsor) who are high level players in the Illuminati.

 

Geographically the City of London, Basel Switzerland, and Brussels (NATO headquarters) are at its heart.

The United Nations, along with all the agencies working under the UN umbrella, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), are full time players in this scheme.

 

Similarly, NATO is a military tool of the NWO.

The leaders of all major industrial countries like the United States, England, Germany, Italy, Australia, New Zealand (members of the "G7/G8”) are all part of the bigger picture. The Illuminati are responsible for certain hand-picked individuals, who are then groomed and selected as Prime Ministers or Presidents.

To finish off Part 2 we can also add the names of some of those involved in the NWO who control Wall Street and the City of London:

One can then look at the very powerful Freemasons movement, AIPAC, Christian Zionist and Jewish Zionist the list is endless.

 

We must not forget such evil people as,

  • Kissinger

  • Rumsfeld

  • Cheney

  • Bremer

  • Bolton

  • Rice

  • Wolfowitz,

...to name a few who all played their part in the NWO.


Back to Contents

 




 

Part 3

New World Order military plans
08 April 2010

 

In my previous article I touched base on the historical plans of the New World Order and how they hoped to encircle the world during the “Cold War” years.

 

This article will explain that plan and how in more modern times they are going down the same road again. The first plan failed but will this second surge allow them to re establish their authority in trying to create a one world power.

The North Atlantic Treaty was signed in 1949 but for many years maintained a very low profile until the outbreak of the Korean War.

 

It was originally established to maintain the so called “Iron Curtain” which in principle was to keep the communist on one side of the fence and the west on the other. It was also around this time (after WW2) that its other intention was to keep Germany in check. It was finally decided that Germany would be split with the establishment of East and West Germany and the Berlin Wall came into existence.


It was interesting to note that in the early years a rift occurred within NATO itself when France objected to the dominance of the US (sound familiar?) and wanted a more balanced control. Needless to say the US never gives away anything and so France started a progressive withdrawal from many of established areas of NATO and by 1967 had very little activity. An alliance remained with France with the proviso that should hostilities re occur France would re enter the organization.


What many people didn’t know was that during the “Cold War” years other pacts were attempted such as the Central Treaty Organization (CENTO) which was originally called the Middle East Treaty Organization (METO) or Baghdad Pact, and the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO).

 

This was the first indication (in the global sense) of the attempt or existence of a New World Order and its intended plans. It became evident to many of the countries involved that this was a US controlled plan with the UK playing an active part.

 

CENTO was doomed from the onset and eventually failed (1958-1979).

SEATO started a little earlier (1955 - 1977) and also failed.

 

I myself participated in military exercises in both organizations and ended up working in NATO, the only organization that remains to this day.


Let’s now move forward to the current time and see how the New World Order is trying to re establish itself in much the same way as it did during the “Cold War” but with much more vigor and manipulation. The main thrust behind this global dominance is by what I call the G3.5, US, UK, France and Germany. So what is their current involvement and what are they hoping to achieve.


They themselves stipulate their main areas of concern are Iran, Yemen, Somalia and North Korea. Iran obviously is a thorn in the side for the West, especially in the eyes of the US, who are desperately trying to secure an extremely lucrative deal to construct a pipeline from Turkmenistan - Afghanistan - Pakistan - India (TAPI).

 

This project is worth trillions of dollars during it expected life but is not going to plan. It should have been up and running many years ago but the war has continued to delay its implementation. The success of this project depended on Pakistan and India purchasing the gas.


For a very long time the US has been attempting to stop Pakistan and India from buying into another pipeline which is on offer from Iran - Pakistan - India (IPI). This pipeline is a much more logical and commercial venture and will not pass through the existing war zone of Afghanistan.

 

There is also a strong interest in this pipeline from the Chinese who may ask for a branch pipeline to run into China. One can clearly see that the New World Order want the TAPI pipeline to happen and consequently have this year re enforced the troops numbers to try and secure Southern Afghanistan for the pipeline route (Heart - Helmand - Kandahar).


The New World Order is all about taking control of major natural resources and securing dominance in oil and gas world markets. The war in Afghanistan was only for this purpose and nothing to do with democracy... obviously the opium trade was also vital to their plans, as are all drugs.


One major set back has now occurred in that Pakistan and India are expected to take the IPI Iranian pipeline and not the US/UK option (TAPI).

 

This must be a major setback for the New World Order and may now cause a major change in their military strategy by pulling out of Afghanistan... time will tell.

As we understand the US want Israel to strike Iran in order to justify bringing the US and NATO into the dog fight.

 

It is clear that the IDF cannot carry out this possible attack alone as they do not have an aircraft that can carry the MOP bomb or do not have the range to make their targets without the assistance of the US.

 

Whatever the outcome the New World Order really do want this to happen in order to weaken the existing regime and at the same time contaminate the country with Depleted/Enriched Uranium Weapons. This would also enhance their plans to contaminate the entire Middle East and thus dramatically attack the genetics of all Islamic countries.

 

Such weapons currently being used in Afghanistan and Gaza directly attack the human DNA.


One could then ask the question why is the US, UK and NATO (New World Order) interested in Yemen and Somalia... the answer is very simple… they want to control the Gulf of Aden in order to control the major shipping lanes that currently passes up the Red Sea and the Suez Canal en route to and from the Mediterranean.

 

Yemen and Somalia sit on either side of this vital supply route. It would also give the US and or NATO an opportunity to set up a major military base to guard and control this passage.


So now we can see a rerun of the old master plan (NATO-CENTO-SEATO) with a significant military presence in the Eastern Mediterranean, Persian Gulf, Gulf of Aden, the Coastline of Somalia with major international military bases scattered in and around the entire Middle East. Over in Southeast Asia we have the same buildup stretching from Singapore - Taiwan - South Korea with a distinct possibility that the US may get back into the Philippines (Mindanao) or if not certainly support that region.


If one looks at an updated map of NATO you can clearly see the progressive advancement in many areas... especially where they may be an Islamic influence.

 

As far as the New World Order is involved the “Cold War” is still in existence to stem the flow of communism or to stop Russia from acquiring more oil/gas dominance on the world market.

 

We also have the New World Order that is suffering from Islamaphobia, who keep pushing the Al Qaeda/Terrorism False Flag issue in order to carry out their own imperialistic dreams of controlling all major oil/gas reserves or securing the major world markets.

 

Currently the vital markets they are after are Pakistan, India and China but these are fast disappearing!


Back to Contents


 




 

Part 4

New World Order breaches UK Constitution
10 April 2010

 

I thought I would start this article writing about many topics such as the well orchestrated financial meltdown, how the British Government is progressively removing the powers as laid down in its historical constitution, the manipulation of the EU, the giving away of tons of gold from our coffers, the false flag Chilcot Inquiry etc., but then realized that I would need to do at least 2-3 parts on this subject alone.

With this in mind I will therefore extend this section into Part 5

I then thought about Brown’s previous push to get Tony Blair into the EU Presidency (despite the fact that he was somewhat tarnished) and how delighted I was to read the following headline:

Former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair missed his chance to be the first EU president, with members selecting the more low-key Belgium Prime Minister Herman Van Rompuy for the job.

Needless to say although I was happy about this I was also concerned that such a strange man would take the helm of a sinking ship.

 

This man must surely be part of the Illuminati or New World Order. He has connection with the international banking fraternity and certainly does not come clean with his past credentials. However, one could also assume that he his acting as a gate keeper until Blair has brushed the mud of his clothes, after the Chilcott report gives him a clean bill of health!

One would have to ask the question,

  • Why would our government hand over tons and tons of gold bullion to the EU at a time when gold was not at a good price and then add insult to injury by selling it off at below market price?

  • Wouldn’t the UK tax payers be interested to know as to why this was done?

  • Was their a connection with that famous New World Order institution, otherwise known as the IMF?

  • Could this be a bribe to fix Blair up with a permanent job, taking him through to retirement?

  • Wouldn’t this be to Gordon Brown’s advantage to have his New World Order partner in crime sitting over on the other side of the English Channel... pulling the strings?

All of this under the table scheming is extremely upsetting, especially when the people of the UK are in actual fact supposed to be running the country with these monsters acting as their representatives.

 

Wasn’t this country forged out of the Magna Carta and wasn’t our history and future based on our historic constitution?

I guess I could just forget this issue and the New World Order as most people out there really do not care or have no interest. However, when our taxpayer’s money is used so blatantly to fund the international bankers and then allow the elite to pick amongst the carcasses of so many companies one must surely want to ask questions?

Surely we do not think for one moment that this financial collapse just happened? Absolutely no way... the New World Order forced this upon us in a very well orchestrated manner... They allowed billions of tax payers money to pay off their bad debt and within one year we find these same rogues reaping back huge profits.

 

We saw them pay back money to their respective Governments and in some cases saw joint ventures evolve. We saw them pick up lucrative deals from the failed companies that they had ruined, whilst at the same time putting millions of ordinary people out of work, out of home or both.

 

My question would be that if the international banker came out on top and if the government were paid back or became partners then why is it that the poor taxpayer will still have to pay higher taxes for the next 5 - 10 years? When do we the taxpayer get our money back?... you already know the answer to that… never!

The fact is that the way the United Kingdom is currently governed is in total violation of our constitution… not only by the fact that they are illegally taking away the power of the Monarch and its citizens by falsely handing this power to a foreign nation. They continue to hand out billions of taxpayers money and then demand to tax us even more… this is in violation of our historical constitution.

I thought I would leave the rest of this article to the words spoken by other good British Citizens who did care and did not sit back in their armchairs, like most of us and just accept what our government is telling us.

My first dedication must go to Mrs. Elizabeth Beckett who worked tirelessly in defending the constitution of the United Kingdom. I find her work so interesting especially when she applied her knowledge in advising readers in the US about the American Constitution.

 

The following is an extract from the Namaste Magazine Vol 10 Issue 2:

As far as the American Constitution is concerned, Jefferson and co made a Masonic Constitution, but they did not wipe out the existing British Constitution on which the colonies had lived for two hundred years. This is the basis of your law and customs.

The English Constitution includes:

  1. Magna Carta, (which the Supreme Court used for the release of the people in Guantanamo Bay

  2. The Petition of Right 1627

  3. The Bill of Rights of 1689

  4. The 1700 Act of Settlement

These legal statutes were made by the people from whom the colonies are descended, only rubber stamped by British Parliament, (governing the colonies at the time) until independence. It is the basis of your Law and your Constitution.

 

The United States Constitution is subject to the British Constitution.

The only elements of the US Constitution that differ from the British Constitution is the royal prerogative and Christianity. The prerogative can exceptionally be used by the President, but is not part of the law as it is with us in the UK. However, the people of the USA cannot rely on the 'prerogative', all they can do is find the relevant phrases that can fight orders.

 

These can be found in the Bill of Rights 1689 and chapter 29 of Magna Carta. Good luck.

I think Elizabeth was a remarkable lady and it is rather sad that this fine lady no longer graces our planet. She was an extremely strong woman with values and having a father as a High Court Judges obviously instilled in her that one must do what is right and not go along with the flow.

 

Here is more information on her stance from the same source:

Mrs. Elizabeth Beckett’s legitimate Constitutional stance against an illegal tax system and treasonous government. A story that should be on the front page of every newspaper, but has remained unreported!

 

This amazingly selfless lady has studied the British Constitution in great depth. Her initial interest in the law began when she was a District Officer’s wife in India where her father, a High Court Judge for many years, was party to drawing up the 1935 India Act of Independence.

 

Elizabeth was summoned to appear in court at Carlisle, a distance from her home of approximately 55 miles.

Without hesitation or complaint, this remarkable 83 year old lady, who in her own words is lame, (she cannot walk very well without aid, due to a painful hip), took a taxi on her own, to the court where a judge listened to her appeal against a threatened bankruptcy order by her local council, for refusing to pay her Council Tax.

 

Her refusal was based on the following objections:

“It is illegal to pay a tax to destroy my country.”

Later she discovered just how illegally councils are acting.

Elizabeth has received very little mainstream media reporting, the little she has had has only been at local level. Nationally, the BBC televised 30 seconds on the Politics Show. Even though she was interviewed by a reporter, the BBC editor refused point blank to broadcast her interview. It was withdrawn.

We ask, could this be because of the influence of Common Purpose?

Namaste has tried to present Elizabeth’s story to various national newspapers:

They were not interested. In fact the News Desk of the Daily Mail in Manchester thought our information about Elizabeth’s Constitutional Rights and the Act of Treason committed against the people of the British nation was far fetched!

 

They put it to the News Desk that we do indeed have a Constitution. This was also dismissed. They ask, could this be because of the influence of Common Purpose?

I am happy to say that despite the British Medias refusal to covering this story (as they did with Hollie Greig); we at the Palestine Telegraph are more than happy to always reveal the truth.

 

When one continues to read about such cover-ups it makes the decision to vote that much harder. The three mainline parties have so much dirty washing to hang out one cannot trust them to run our country. Their policies are so much aligned to the New World Order that one must never allow them to succeed.

Again I will use more information from Namaste in order to give them the media coverage they deserve:

It is quite clear that we are dealing with mindset which is at best totally ignorant and, at worst, working deliberately to subvert our ancient Constitutional history - The Birth Right of the People of England, (1700). This is still the law of the land today!

 

How could this happen? The plan has been carefully contrived.

 

The journalist Stewart Alsop wrote:

“Knowledge is power and power is the most valuable commodity in government. So whoever knows the secrets controls the knowledge and therefore holds the power...”

This would help to explain why Harold Wilson removed the teaching of the Constitution from the British education curriculum, in the 1960’s and 1970’s.

 

Today, Britain’s universities DO NOT teach treason laws, the greatest crime against a nation; hence today, we find our nation and our freedom in the most critical situation. How could this happen you may ask?

 

The answer to this can be found in the descriptively accurate words of Cicero Marcus Tullius, born on 3 January, 106 BC and murdered on 7 December, 43 BC:

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.

 

For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist.

 

A murderer is less to fear.”

This is so precisely true of what is taking place today, not only in Britain, but other countries of the Commonwealth, and the USA - this is the Common Purpose.

 

We and our colleagues both in the UK and USA, are deeply concerned with the direction that both our nations are heading, yet so many seem woefully ignorant. This is not because people are stupid but they lack time and interest to inform themselves, largely because of the education system and mass media control with mind manipulations.

 

We see and hear people acting like sheep, unheeded by the ever emerging totalitarian state, unquestioning, unwilling to research and blindly accepting lies and half-truths from those who can only be best described at misinformed and in the main, deliberate liars.


Part of this disinformation relates to our Council Tax in the UK. For the benefit of our overseas readers, Council Tax is a tax on domestic property collected by local councils in the UK.

 

The council is supposed to use this revenue to pay for local services such as schools, rubbish (garbage) collection, roads and street lighting, etc.

 

 


Fiscal Prerogative

Elizabeth felt driven to research the issue of Council Tax accounts, having observed various related, suspicious news articles in the press one of which involved the North West Regional Council of the UK purchasing a house in Brussels, a totally inappropriate action in view of the sufferings of the Cumbrian fishermen and farmers.

 

This alarmed her to the fact that she might well, as a law abiding honest Council Tax payer, be assisting in the potential breakup of her country.

 

We must emphasize that Constitutional Law is not a matter of politics, whether one votes to drive on the left or the right, but a matter of law like the dividing of Britain into ‘Lander’ such as the county of Kent becoming part of France, and Wales becoming part of Ireland etc.

 

That is against our law and Elizabeth said she could not pay for the destruction of the sovereignty of this country. She then asked for full disclosure of how her Council Tax is being spent. This has not been forthcoming because of the liability order against her; the order is an executive order and in Britain alone is governed by the Royal Prerogative.

 

The Enforcement Officer and people in charge of the courts refused to admit that the Liability Order could be challenged in any way. According to the Petition of Right of 1627 all taxation should be honored by Parliament, under the Royal Assent and Parliament cannot pass acts that are against our Constitution.

Elizabeth further discovered a covert plan to do with the regional assemblies. These are voluntary bodies that are designed to break up England, e.g. Northumberland up to Carlisle will became part of Germany.

 

This was not mentioned in the Labour Party manifesto.

Amongst the papers she handed to the judge at her trial, were the details of Common Purpose and their assemblies, which have increased by 500% since the year 2000. Taxation emanates from the Chancellor’s Office and these are illegal under what is known as the ‘fiscal prerogative’ and the ‘Petition of Right’. Because these assemblies are voluntary bodies, they are not available for funding by the taxpayer.

 

Our Constitution states that ‘all laws’ that go through Parliament ‘must have Royal Assent, in order to become law.’ Instead, they are now validated on a false claim that the Royal Assent is automatic. However, the power to grant this is part of the prerogative, which it impassable.


The automatic assent was invented by the Fabian Prime Minister Asquith who gave the qualification based on the premise that Queen Ann had been the last monarch to send back a bill.

 

The implication being that the monarch could not send back bills, whereas in fact, their power lies in the support of our Constitutional Laws by refusing to give Assent to bills that are unconstitutional.

 

 


The Parliament Act

In fact Edward VII had refused to pass the Parliament Act in 1910 and as such Asquith had to go to the country for a vote which he lost.

 

A plan was devised to get this bill back, so he invited 40 Fabian Socialists and 82 Sien Fien to join his party in order to destroy the House of Lords which had been holding on to the fiscal prerogative and in so doing he set out to destroy the British Constitution.

The Parliament Act is actually illegal under the Constitution and the 1848 Treason and Felony Act, which states that neither House, Lords nor the Commons has power above the other. The 1911 Act altered the ‘fiscal power,’ which according to our Constitution cares for all taxpayers, as stated under the Petition of Right (part of the Constitution - No taxation without representation).

 

This puts taxation illegally into the hands of the majority political party in the Commons, and without any amendment allowed from the House of Lords.

At the time of the French Revolution and the American Independence, political parties weren’t fixed as in the Masonic Constitution of America, which is based on the principal of divide and rule. Whereas in Britain, the British Constitution was made by the People for the People and the monarch holds them together according to our Constitutional laws.

 

In relation to this fact, Elizabeth put forward to the judge the question of Brussels acting illegally under European Laws which invalidated the court itself. e.g. the 1988 Mercantile Shipping Act in relation to Spaniards fishing within the British 12 mile limit.

 

Brussels overruled it and fined the British £300,000. In doing this Brussels claimed rights over our Sovereign and Parliament who had passed the Act. She pointed out to the court under this ruling it had no validity.

 

At which point the judge shut her up and said,

“I am under contract to make a liability order against you since the order allowed no exception.”

This is entirely against our constitutional laws. Elizabeth then asked for leave to appeal.

 

The judge replied,

“You can do what you like.”

Elizabeth explained to the judge that Queens Council has given her his opinion,

“Technically under the Rules of Erskine May, it is stated the Automatic Assent, if not complied with, would invalidate ALL laws since 1911”.

 

 

Common law

Elizabeth’s Plaint lays the ground for important legal and Constitutional constraints which are being side-stepped and their legal validity is being denied by our present legal system and government.

 

The fact they are still part of our British Common law is undeniable, Sir Edward Coke said,

“The Royal Prerogative is part of the Personality of the Monarch and could not be taken from them even by an Act if Parliament” which the Law Lords Halbury and Jowitt agree.

Halbury’s Laws, The Birth Right of the People of England - These are legal reference books of great prestige.

Since the Assent is given under the regal ‘Prerogative Power,’ it is invalid if it is given to an unconstitutional act.

 

So in a different way, both Counsel’s opinion and Elizabeth’s lead to the same conclusion. Therefore, she says that one can conclude that ALL of the bills that have been made law since 1911, which includes 1972 entry into Europe, and all that follows, together with the Civil Contingencies Bill, the constitutional Reform Act, Equality Act and the Immigration Act ARE VOID.


It is clear that our entry into the European Union is INVALID, ILLEGAL and against our Constitution. Treason has been committed and should be remedied.

Namaste once asked Elizabeth why she was making this potentially dangerous and difficult stance at her time of life.

 

She replied:

“I do it for my children, grandchildren and for all our ancestors - all those who have died for our freedom. Do you want to see your children in chains? I was in India during the war and knew about the fight against the Japanese and I knew about the earlier war and I quote John Edmonds... ‘When You Go Home, Tell Them Of Us And Say, For Their Tomorrow, We Gave Our Today’”

John Maxwell Edmonds (1875 -1958).

She went on to say:

“Talk about the Constitution. Research it. Know it. Know that it exists and help to keep it alive against the evil forces dedicated to its destruction.”

Elizabeth also suggested the following:

Readers should consider raising the following points as set out below, with their local council. Bear in mind that it is probable that Common Purpose is operating in your area. Councils cannot take taxes for an organization that cannot achieve an audit. It is illegal under the Local Government Act 1972, which is still used for auditing local government accounts.

All those who pay Council Tax should write to their local council and quote section 239 of the 1972 ACT.

  1. You as the Council have the right to oppose or depose acts in Parliament.


    Under your oaths of allegiance, the laws in the Bill of Rights of 1689 make clear this country CANNOT be ruled by ANY foreign power: “No foreign Prince, person, Prelate, State, or Potentate, hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction, Power, Superiority, Pre eminence, or Authority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realm.”


    They also added two codicils at the end of the Bill of Rights “Any amendments to the bill after the 23 October 1689 shall be void and not lawful, and this bill is for all time”.
     

  2. This law and its oath are not subject to Parliament because they were given to Parliament by the People whose WILL is supreme over Parliament.


    This means Parliament may not allow any part of the aforementioned oath to be breached side-stepped or ignored. This Bill of Rights precludes and effectively forbids Parliament from passing any bill like the 1972 EEC Act, the Treaty of Rome or any other European legislation which gives them any say at all in the governance of England. It also precludes Parliament from passing any laws contrary to the spirit of this Bill of Rights.

    Chief Justice Beresford said;

    • “You must look on the spirit of the law not just how it is written.”

     

    The Scots have their own version of this law. Indeed the people and Parliament were told the 1972 EEC Act was a purely trading agreement with no Constitutional impact at all!
     

  3. Since you use the Local Government Act for your audit, I wish to draw your attention to another services’ misdemeanour and that is you have been paying my council tax in to an unaudited administration (this is the 13th year).
     

  4. If I were to pay my Council Tax I would be complicit in this illegality. Even more seriously, I would be allowing without complaint, the present Government’s intention to herd this country over to this illegal administration.
     

  5. Under the powers given to you under section 239 you have the power to refuse to agree this and would be acting illegally if you did not.
     

  6. This applies to any council, PRESS them to ACT under these laws.
    Do you want to be like the judge acting illegally under European law? Or do you want to do something about it? We must never forget, our Constitution was made by our ancestors (often with their lives) not by Parliament.

The 'prerogative power' is given to the monarch by the PEOPLE, under the Bill of Rights of 1689 and Magna Carta.

 

The monarch agrees to protect our laws and customs under the Coronation Oath and the Constitution. Failure do so is TREASON against the people! We are protected from GESTAPO type (executive) law by the 'prerogative'. This is what the New World order is trying to take away from us. This is our ancient law. Therefore, why has the monarch signed FIVE illegal treaties taking us into a criminalized organization - the EU which is completely against our Constitution?

Elizabeth did apply for an interlocutory injunction to stop Brown and his associates taking us, the People of the UK further into an illegal administrative situation. (Anyone can and should do this).

 

It is illegal for a government to be financially involved with an organization that cannot even audit its own accounts. The EU has not audited its accounts for the past 13 years.
 


OPEN LETTER TO PRIME MINISTER BROWN

Dear Mr. Brown

It appears that you are acting under the Constitutional Reform Act of 2005, imagining that you, as a Prime Minister, hold the 'prerogative power.'

Are you sir, aware of the meaning of the 'PREROGATIVE POWER'? Have you taken constitutional legal advice on this very serious action of entry into the EU? If so from whom have you sought such advice? Are you aware that this is a serious crime against the People of Britain? It is TREASON.

Yours Sincerely

Mrs. Elizabeth Beckett

THE ABOVE QUESTIONS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO ASK MR. BROWN BECAUSE - UPON TAKING OFFICE HE MADE A OATH OF ALLEGIANCE WHICH INCORPORATES OUR CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND FAILURE TO ABIDE BY THE SAID OATH OF ALLEGIANCE IS ALSO TREASON.

We ask readers to please to copy the above letter and replace Elizabeth's name with their own name and send to number 10 Downing Street and see what response they get.

 

All letters received from number 10 Downing Street to the above letter, if any, will published in the Palestine Telegraph. I guess we should not hold our breath waiting because as the end of the day they not longer serve the public that puts them in office.

We should all take a chapter out of the life of dear Mrs. Beckett and reclaim our country from the talons of the New World Order.

 

I have included the following timeline as published in the Namaste Magazine covering the latter part of Elizabeth’s life leading up to her death:

 

24th December 2007

  • There is a delay in the appeal for judicial review because the court in now informed Elizabeth that since a certificate of service has not been received by the court the case can't move forward. The fact is the certificate of service was faxed to the court on 1st December by a government employee on Elizabeth's behalf. She also has a letter from the local council dated 8th December, confirming receipt of the certificate of service and she has sent copies of the said letters to the court. Thus Elizabeth has asked the court for an upgrading of her case which has been delayed because they claimed they had not received the certificate of service.

  • A notice is about to be served on Elizabeth for a court hearing in February 2008 to implement the bankruptcy order made against her in March 2007. The hearing will take place in Carlisle.

  • Interestingly, the interlocutory injunction filed by Elizabeth to stop Brown and his associates taking us, the People of the UK further into an illegal administrative situation, seems to be delayed lost in the system. How unusual!

The hearing for the implementation for the liability order against Elizabeth will take place on the 6th February 2008 at Carlisle Court, Rickergate at 2.40pm.

 

This was to validate the extent of her liability because her income is so low which has now been dealt with.
 


27th February 2008

  • Thanks to the generous donations received by members of the public, we were able to pay into court the £1,293.97 required to prevent the bankruptcy order against Elizabeth's being executed. Her home has been saved for now. Nevertheless, Elizabeth still intends pursue her case against the illegal Liability Order


27 May, 2008

  • The legal advice that as been given to Elizabeth is that she should have professional to help in putting her case together so that it can go forward. This needs some reformulation for resubmission of her application before the administrative High Court.


21 June, 2008

  • Today, Elizabeth has been advised by the Penrith Magistrates that they have passed a Liability Order against her, for refusal to pay her Council tax. She has taken this stance in order that she can take her case foreword and therefore continues to pursue her application for judicial review against the illegality Liability Order in the Council Tax Act of 1992. Penrith Council have informed her she can appeal her case which she fully intends to do.

  • Further updates on Elizabeth's situation will be posted as and when we have more information. Please note, that what Elizabeth is doing, for all of us, not just for herself, and therefore she needs all our support!


7 February, 2009

  • It is with great sadness that we share the news of the passing of Mrs. Elizabeth Beckett after her fight against leukemia. Elisabeth was the daughter of a High Court judge. The fact she managed one last shot across the bows of the nation's ever-dwindling sovereignty says so much about her steadfastness.

To close Part 4 of this series I will print a copy of her last letter to the Queen before passing away. This will not be the last we hear of Elizabeth Beckett as I intend to print another classical letter she wrote.

 

This astute lady will never be forgotten and as we will see many others are taking up the fight... in the meantime read and enjoy:

 

Her Majesty The Queen
Buckingham Palace
London SW1A 1AA

21 January 2009
Unconstitutional reign

Madam
Giving careful consideration to the mode of address in this letter, although in courtesy I have addressed it in conventional manner, it is clear that having, in effect, abdicated by failure to perform your coronation oath you leave the people of this nation without effective titular head to whom we may address our petitions.

 

I write to you only in your pre-eminence in Common Law. I write on Edmund Burke's remark that for evil to flourish it is sufficient for good men to do nothing.


At your coronation you swore on oath to rule this country according to our laws and customs. This contract with us was written clearly in Magna Carta and replicated by Edward I in 1274. After saying that he would give no such oath, the archbishops, bishops, barons and freemen said that, in this case, they would get another king.

In Magna Carta it was made clear that if the monarch went against this oath then chapter 61 would apply, the contract would be broken and the monarch would have to give up his position and possessions. You have, throughout your reign, disregarded our laws and customs in the legislation that has gone through Parliament.

I believe that you have done this on the basis of the Fabian inspired Parliament Act of 1911 which argued untruthfully that since royal assent had never been denied by a monarch since 1707 (when Queen Anne sent back a Bill) the use of the royal assent had fallen into abeyance.

 

This claim was untrue and treasonable. Only the year before, Asquith had been forced to go to the country by Edward VII who sent back the same Bill to Parliament. And indeed monarchs had refused assent on at least six other occasions since 1707. On each occasion this refusal of assent was because the Bills concerned breached our constitution.


In other words, the 1911 claim, is incorrect and the monarch's assent was never and can never be deemed unnecessary or automatic, even though George V chose to accept that the royal assent was now a formality and that the monarch could not, in reality refuse assent - as in the Northern Ireland Bill.

Despite all the long years of your reign this method of agreement, either forced on you, or under "automatic assent" nevertheless cannot be upheld as lawful.

Many people who have written to you on constitutional matters have received replies from your secretary (most recently, Sonia Bonici) saying that their letter had been forwarded to the government department misleadingly called the Department of Constitutional Affairs and Ministry of Justice. Your compliance with this has permitted the judiciary under these government departments to claim, as in the Chagos Archipelago appeal, that our fundamental liberties do not exist and that the peoples of these islands have no rights under our law.

I am old and now seriously ill. I cannot die without making clear to you that you have broken your oath to us your people.

The 1911 act purports to permit taxes to be levied on us merely by a majority in the House of Commons and without reference to the upper chamber. This again is against our constitution and specifically not permitted by our Petition of Right of 1627. The most serious instance of this is the use of our taxes to fund the banking system of this country: this is being explained to the electorate as a step which will in some way make us rich, whilst in fact it is not only unlawful, but a most serious abrogation of our rights and your duties under our constitution.

Your contract with the people of this country and the colonies and dominions cannot be destroyed by the chicanery of the Fabians in the 1911 Act, nor by subsequent legislation.

 

If you have the courage to fulfill your contract, however belatedly, you could prorogue Parliament now and have a free election with or without party divisions so that this country can go forward in a proper and united way to remove us from the difficulties that have ensued since the 1911 Parliament Act.

Yours Faithfully,
Elisabeth Beckett

Copy to: The Archbishop of Canterbury

I am sure readers would agree that this person represents what we all feel but never have the courage to act upon.

 

I would like to congratulate the Namaste Web Page for their gallant effort in trying to bring this to the world’s attention. It is rather sad that once again we see the British Media neglecting the British Public in bringing this out into the open. It goes without saying that Elizabeth Beckett never gave up in her fight for justice and to retain the traditions of the United Kingdom.

 

I therefore dedicate this article in her name...

Back to Contents
 




 

Part 5

New World Order breaches UK Constitution
13 April 2010

 

In my previous article (Part 4) I discussed the illustrious efforts of Mrs. Elizabeth Beckett in addressing the breaches by the UK Government of our ancient constitution.

 

Elizabeth sadly passed away on the 7th February 2009 and this classic letter is an example of her ability to shake the very foundation of UK politics.

The following dedication was made by Martin Cole on his Blog.


As an example of her long fight for the restoration of the Sovereignty of the British people and this nation's restored independence AND in recognition of the sturdy fight she waged for her fellow countrymen and women, I reproduce below a letter she sent to Sir Anthony Clarke, Master of the Rolls dated 10th October last year which confronts recent constitutional outrages not least in the matter of the banks!

 

Please circulate this as widely as possible in tribute to this fantastic Lady.

Sir Anthony Clarke

Master of the Rolls
From Elizabeth Hibbert Beckett

10 October 2008

Dear Sir Anthony - your Lordship

I write to you in your position as Master of the Rolls and in view of your article on Magna Carta in The Times.

Churchill, writing on Magna Carta, said, that there will come a time when government, inflated with power, will try to overrule it, but it will come into use again.

 

I write with deep and serious concern about the present actions by government on using taxpayers money for their debts, apparently due to their encouragement of hysteria since there is "plenty of money around" (said by speakers on Today and Newsnight).
 

  1. The safeguards that need immediate action are:

    1. that the debt should be made under the Nordic system

    2. that it should be safeguarded as belonging legally to the Taxpayers NOT the Government.
       

    1. The Queen should be asked to prorogue parliament immediately as a temporary arrangement until there has been an election.
       

    2. A national government of convention should hold the fort. (The Queen was unfortunately taught about the constitution by Sir Henry Martin who became a Fabian in 1921. She has apparently not grasped the significance of her position and her Coronation Oath and imagines that she is subordinate to her ministers.)
       

    3. I consider that as Master of the Rolls in this terrible time it must be for you to try to disabuse her of this and hold chapter 61 of Magna Carta to her notice. (Various people have suggested Princess Anne as Queen in her place since Prince Charles has not grasped the Christian importance of our constitution in Magna Carta and throughout our history - our early Christianity, starting from c. AD 50, has been central to wars from without and within against 'this dear land'; Magna Carta as a defence against William of Normandy's laws. Llanfranc was the imposed archbishop of Canterbury and the invasion was inspired by Papal direction.
       

    4. I write to you since Lord Faulkner acted unconstitutionally in putting before Parliament that the Royal Prerogative belonged to himself and the Prime Minister in the Constitution Reform Act of 2005. You will know Sir Edward Coke's clear description that the prerogative could not be taken from the monarch - even by act of Parliament, agreed by Halsbury.
       

  2. Your position as effectively deputy Lord Chancellor gives you authority to support us, the people of England and Scotland.

     

    On the other hand, government has shown a lack of constitutional restraint and even lack of knowledge of the laws of this country both in the Constitution Reform Act and further acts that have forced me and others to ask you to use the strength of your position acting as the executive guardian the people of this country and contracted to the monarchy by law.

     

    As the substitute Lord Chancellor, when the other appointee betrayed his position a by treasonous claim initially defined by the 1351 Treason Act.


     

  3. I have take two steps in the defense of our position

    1. I have laid Information with the court lawyer at Newcastle, Mr. Brown, that by making the Queen sign the Lisbon Constitution, Mr. Gordon Brown, acted treasonably against various Acts, his own Oath of Allegiance, and his Privy Councillor Oath. (This perjury should legally remove him from Parliament.)
       

    2. With the help of a friend, a retired policeman, I e-mailed the Speaker of the House of Commons that by passing as law the Bradford & Bingley takeover, being called 'nationalization' by Statutory Instrument without mention of the name of the monarch Mr. Brown and Mr. Darling acted unlawfully and should not be allowed to take up their seats in the Commons. I quoted the basis of this illegality as the 1661 Praemunire in which the punishment of a Praemunire is outlawry, the loss of property and land and possibly death.

      Harold Wilson repealed Praemunire which goes back to 1392. But since when he did this it would have been in defiance of the 1795 Treasonable and seditious practices act para 2, 36 Geo III c.7, his oath of allegiance and his Privy Council oath, it was not lawful. And this valuable act of George III was made permanent in 1807, 1817 and 1848, so was given strength and longevity even against Mr. Blair's endeavor to repeal it in the Criminal Justice Act 1998.
       

  4. On The Borrowing

    1. I doubt whether the government has the power to borrow to this extent for a national government. The 1911 Parliament Act which gives the majority power in the Commons without the Lord's right to amend had already been sent back as unconstitutional by Edward VII. It was accepted by George V under the impression that automatic assent of Asquith (another Fabian) was correct like the Statutory Instruments the present Government laid on the table at the time of Northern Rock.

       

      It was made on the false basis that no Bill has been sent back by a monarch since Queen Anne in 1707.

      1. There is no trace of discussion in Hansard or anywhere else

      2. Bills had been sent back by William III, George III, William IV, Victoria and Edward VII, as Asquith well knew. Such a claim of automatic assent paralyzed our constitutional laws and is probably the basis of the Queen's behaviour.
         

  5. If the people are to be helped at this time, three means of taxation should be changed.

    1. Mortgage relief should be reinstated.

    2. VAT which leans very heavily on small businesses - or at least Mrs. Thatcher's VAT rebate. It is merciless, politically motivated and costs the nation £20 Billion annually with no benefit to this people.

    3. Tax on fuel should be reduced since its effect is arbitrary by any taxable logic.
       

  6. So Mr. Blair altered legal aid so much that even people on my income (less than £9,000 pa) cannot get it and treason needs a very narrow certificate from the lawyers. I therefore ask you to take the steps necessary under 2a) above if it is by any means within your power.
     

  7. I am taking a case on the illegality of some aspects of council tax in the high court: I was granted oral review, but thought it wiser to have counsel rather than act on my own and Leolyn Price CB QC has kindly agreed to represent me.
     

  8. The lowering of trust apparently intentionally has led to loss to shareholders for whom legal protection is needed. The people in Parliament seem to have little knowledge of the law nor the legal protection of the people, only the desire for power and in this case globalisation. William Blackstone said, "Law is not a matter of opinion." This, our representatives seem not to have learnt.
     

  9. The House of Lords is the Curia Regis to advise the Monarch. The suggestion that a man who has twice been asked to leave the government for malfeasance should be given a position in the Lords tends to further distrust of government at a time when trust is essential if the nation is to come together and rise above the present discomfort and lack of trust in this government and the Curia Regis.

     

    It gives an impression of irresponsibility in government which is outside our principles and traditions. But apparently fits in with the teaching of five-year-olds that they are part of a wider community without being based in their own. Mr. Blunkett, Mr. Brown and others have published books paid for by the tax-payer effectively dispersing any concept of our Christian heritage.

     

    Mr. Brown, as an example, in his white paper has said he intends to give the Royal Prerogative to Parliament or even to the people in one sweep of the pen without recognizing the meaning of the prerogative removing our history and our constitution for which our ancestors fought.
     

  10. I now put before your Lordship the grounds of high treason against those presently governing this nation.

    1. Firstly so that the so-called removal of the prerogative power from the Queen comes directly under the 1351 Treason Act since the Act of Constitutional Reform by taking the prerogative from the monarch, the power being in Sir Edward Coke’s words a part of the monarch and cannot be taken from the monarch even by act of parliament and removal, therefore, comes directly within the phrase "if a man compasses or imagines the death of the sovereign..." it is treason: "if a man levies war against the sovereign…" and by taking over the position of the Lord Chancellor and turning it into something else this comes into "slaying the Lord Chancellor…".

       

      And as head of constitutional affairs and the justices by false laws that treason is further laid and supported in later treason Acts and backed by the 1351 Treason act in the words, "…and because that many other cases of the like treason may happen in time to come which a man cannot think or declare at this present time; it is accorded, that if any other case of supposed treason which is not above specified…" is to go before the justices and the king to be judged treason or felony
       

    2. Under this heading I name the imposition of automatic into "the Royal Assent". for this has been claimed "as to the status of convention that the Royal Assent is not withheld from Bills which have been passed by both houses of parliament the Prime Minister is in doubt …" (quoted from 1972 letter from 10 Downing street)

       

      This conflicts with the statement in Rogers Walters, "How Parliament Works", Pearson and Longman fourth edition which is in use in the speaker’s office and in most county libraries where the Royal Assent is clearly defined:

      • "A Bill presently before both houses needs the Royal Assent as the third element of Parliament before it can become law."

       

      Rogers and Walters add the concept of the assent being ‘automatic’ and it is relevant to the treason that the phrase was inserted in 1911 for King George V to be persuaded to pass the Parliament Act and other legislation against our constitution.

       

      Under the framework of the Treason and Felony Act of 1848, ‘any person who compasses or imagines devises or intends to depose… in order to force constrain or compel her or they to change their measures or courses… shall be guilty of felony", conviction being transportation for not less than seven years with hard labour.

     

    In the book on the constitution by Nigel Knight, tutor in Law at Cambridge University, a further aberration and compelling of the mind of the monarch on the Home Rule Bill for Ireland was given against the wishes of George V.

    That this chicanery has continued to be used does not make it less heinous and it is relevant that the claim of 1972 from Downing Street connived with the entry into the EC and hence the EU.
     

  11. I write now, in view of the danger, after the attempt of Michael Foot to nationalize banks, now being effected under the same intention, but with the camouflage of a world economic crisis, to ask your Lordship to declare the automatic assent void and illegal under the constitutional statute including that of 1795 made perpetual in 1807, 1817 and 1848 and only repealed under the automatic assent, Rogers and Walters claim the assent by convention had become automatic since Queen Anne was the last monarch to send a Bill back. In fact, William III, George III, William IV, Queen Victoria and, as Asquith well knew, Edward VII (because the Bill had been handed to him), had all returned Bills.
     

  12. Most of the ordinary people of England such as myself and my friends, know the principles of our constitutional laws for which the freemen and barons of England fought and forced on John with the help of the bishops and arch-bishops at Runnymede.

    The cruelty, despite constitutional constraint, which successive governments have forced on us involves a mercilessness that has to be held as treason against the sovereign people and augurs badly for such people having the power over our money. I fought for ‘the man on the shop floor’ when I gave Lord Hailsham the concept of the conscience clause against the Foot Bill (Trades Unions and Labour Relations Amendment Bill).

     

    Lord Hailsham was unable to get that clause through and it had to wait until Mrs. Thatcher and yet this is central to our spiritual existence as a Christian nation. These politicians could see no relevance in the freedom of the spirit of man.
     

  13. We, the ordinary people of Britain, the freemen, ask for you to take the steps needed to free our constitutional laws and customs giving us protection against the hideous and treasonous servitude under which we are presently held and free our sovereign from the Fabian thrall or, failing that, under chapter 61 of Magna Carta, replace her with someone able to honor their Coronation Oath.

The present situation is worse than that under King John.
 

(signed)

Elizabeth Beckett

 

As we can see this lady certainly knew her stuff and will be sadly missed…

”Dear Mrs Beckett may your soul rest in peace and I sincerely hope that your courage and determination lives on in the hearts and minds of those that care for their country.”

We can now turn to those that remain and continue to challenge the system. One such person that comes to mind is John Harris who on the 22nd of March 2008 traveled to London to serve an Affidavit on the Queen at Buckingham Palace.


As one would expect at the gates to the palace his journey to proceed was stopped by a very courteous policeman and thus was unable to deliver the Affidavit in person. John refused to give up on his mission and so he decided he would take took the next option and send it recorded delivery to the Queen before he left London. John has a long line of credits to his name and is persistent to say the least.

 

You can see his effort to deliver the Affidavit on this link:

 

 


Another person who stands up for what is right is Brian Gerrish a true British stalwart who never gives up and has given so much of his time in fighting the fight for true justice.

 

We should take our hats off to these two brave men who are prepared to take on the establishment. Brian like John also has a long list of credits and both can be research and viewed on the internet and You Tube.

 

Brian’s follow up on John’s attempt to serve the Affidavit can be viewed on the following link:

 

 


There are many other proud Brits who do not want to see this country become part of the European Union and thus loose its identity... can one ever imagine not being able to say you are British, or English etc when you are asked the question... it is perfectly possible that your answer may well be simply European!
 

I cannot list all of those that continue this daily fight with the authorities but it would not be fair for me not to mention Albert Burgess (an ex policeman) who feels very bitter towards the way this country is being steered. You can view him on and see for yourself.
 

What was interesting in the Affidavit document was a very powerful sentence which read:

This oath, states quite clearly, that “I now give Her Majesty 40 days to dismiss the traitors that reside in the Parliament of this country.”

Because of the seriousness of the New World Order’s attack on our constitution I have decided to extend this aspect of the current series.

  • It is so serious that there is a distinct possibility that our constitution could soon become null and void. I therefore ask the question, are we, the residents of this great country, going to allow key political figures to destroy our history and legal system?

  • Are we going to allow our Queen to fail in her duties?

  • Are we going to allow the United Kingdom to be handed over, by our corrupt politicians, and controlled by foreign powers?

 

“This is clearly an act of treason as the highest level.”

Before closing this particular topic I would now like to introduce you to someone else who like many of us are fearless of authority.

 

His name is Mark Welsh a very proud Brit who resides in Scotland and does not accept the lies and deceit that are handed out by the political elite in the Scottish Parliament and also in Westminster.


Although rather long I would fully recommended those that are concerned about the welfare of their country to read this in its entirety and also Part 6 for his final brief on the New World Order and the governments attack on the constitution up to the current time.

 

Continue reading in this pdf file...

 

Back to Contents

 

 

 



 

Part 6

New World Order breaches UK Constitution

Sedition and Treason
13 April 2010

 

In my last article (Part 5 above) I started the story relating to Sedition and Treason that the UK Government has been progressively carrying out since the days of Prime Minister Edward Heath back in 1971.

All governments since that time have been chipping away at the UK constitution right up to the current day.

 

Anyone implicated in this activity are guilty of a very serious crime, namely the crime of Sedition under common law and the crime of treason under common law.

 

Because of the seriousness of these crimes it is important that a full account be given of the brave attempts by concerns members of the public to halt this, under the counter manipulation, of the UK Constitution. If the citizens of the United Kingdom do nothing then within a very short timeframe the country as we know it will be gone forever.


This is the continuation of Part 5:

 

A LAYMAN’S VIEW OF THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION
by Mark Welsh

First of all, I do not profess to have any background in the study of law and certainly not Constitutional law. It is also extremely difficult to find any Law firm which does practice Constitutional law. I suggest there is good reason for this.

 

Furthermore, I read an article, recently, which suggested that the UK government were suggesting that the teaching of British history within our schools would not go further back than 1700 - An interesting point in time, if this is so, since it means that the Glorious Revolution of 1688 and the introduction of the Bank of England in 1694 would never be taught - not that, as I understand it, the latter issue has ever been taught in our schools except, perhaps, to state the year in which it was established.

What happens when a society grows up unaware of its past and the significant events which transpired to create today’s society and culture within the UK? It ends up providing a clean slate upon which, the government establishment can rewrite history and recreate and form the society it so pleases. A perfect environment to shape entirely new policy and legislation to allow the imposition of a totally new form of government - a form of government which is based upon laws being created by Banking and Corporation interests.

 

A form of government, therefore, which is purely focused on revenue and profit being squeezed out of every single individual. A form of government which does not recognize free men and women but demands that every citizen creates value, otherwise they are dispensed with.

 

This is not at all difficult to achieve. It already exists to a great extent through propaganda - the stigma attached to the unemployed while the state does not provide an environment which allows for full employment. When a country destroys and/or sells off its industry, what does one expect? However, I digress.

There was a letter sent to our government by a “Loyal British Voter” some time ago which I picked up on and re - present here:
 

EU Directive Consultation Response,
Government Equalities Office,

9th Floor, Eland House,
Bressenden Place,
London,SW1 5DU.

HRH Queen Elizabeth, at her coronation in 1953,swore on oath before Almighty God to govern the British people according to Gods Law and customs per the Bible. Likewise, it is incumbent on all politicians including the prime minister to obey those laws in support of the Oath sworn by our Queen.

Further, in accordance with the Declaration of Rights 1688,they are required to resist the encroachment of a foreign power (e.g the European Union), and all Directives emanating from the EU are in contradiction of those laws and have no jurisdiction in this realm of the British Isles.

The Declaration of Rights of 1688 is a settlement treaty and NOT an Act of Parliament and therefore cannot be repealed by Parliament.

Therefore it is imperative that the present Prime Minister and Parliament repeal the European Communities Act of 1972,from which the EU derives all its authority, and stop trying to enforce those Directives on the British people, or else the Parliament should be dissolved and the British people given the chance to re-elect a Government which will truly represent them, without any European influence.

So the aforementioned EU Directive consultation is therefore null and void and a waste of public money, therefore any person or Parliamentary candidate is guilty of TREASON in trying to implement it.

I also advise you, that you personally who are involved in this consultation, are considered to be a party to an act of treason and traitors to your countrymen, and therefore should also be tried for participating in an act of Treason.

Yours Sincerely.

THE CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION RE SOVEREIGNTY
 

To consider this treason issue further, it is necessary to look deeply into the term “Sovereignty” and how the Constitution is framed to protect such sovereignty.....
 


What is Sovereignty and where does it lie in the UK?
What is Sovereignty?

" Sovereignty is the legitimate and exclusive right to exercise power within a given area"

In other words - Sovereignty is Supreme Power.

Different types of sovereignty exist:

  • Legal Sovereignty: where Supreme Power lies according to the law

  • Political Sovereignty: where Supreme Power lies in reality

  • Pooled Sovereignty (In the EU, a supranational organization, decisions are made by European Institutions on which all members are represented, but none has a overall say)

Most democratic political systems have both the separation of powers and checks and balances to prevent a single institution becoming omnipotent although, in practice, when the Executive Branch of government - the Cabinet - can plant who they wish within the judiciary, then that separation is lost.
 


Parliamentary Sovereignty
Parliamentary Sovereignty is regarded as the main principle of the British Constitution. In other words, Parliament holds the supreme authority in the UK.

In what ways is Parliament sovereign?

  • Parliament has the ultimate political authority. Most key decisions (but not all, as some military and foreign decisions are in the hands of the PM) must be approved by Parliament.

  • All powers exercised by ministers (except for the prerogative powers of the PM), devolved governments, local governments and other public bodies are granted by parliament and can be removed by Parliament.

  • All new primary legislation must be passed by parliament and secondary legislation made by ministers can be overruled by Parliament.

  • Parliament is not bound by its predecessors (i.e. past Parliaments cannot control the actions of the current Parliament).

  • Parliament cannot bind its successors (i.e. it cannot pass laws that cannot be repealed or amended by future Parliaments).

So, is Parliament really Sovereign?

Parliamentary sovereignty has been undermined in a number of areas:

- Political Parties:
Since the reductions in the power of the House of Lords in 1911 and 1949, the balance of power has shifted to the House of Commons. Combined with the dominance of political parties in elections since the start of the C20, this has led to tight party control over MP's and disciplined parliamentary groups that make the business of the House of Commons very predictable.

- Executive:
Practical reality dictates that the British Government is the majority party in the House of Commons. Strong party discipline makes this majority reliable and almost guarantees the Government victory in Commons votes - an 'Elective Dictatorship'. Also backed by the Civil Service 'machine' it is easy to argue that sovereignty actually lies with the executive not Parliament. However, Prime Ministers who systematically repress the powers of party and parliament tend to meet their fate - Margaret Thatcher is a classic example of this. However this hasn't happened yet, with Brown, and doesn't look to be on the cards for some strange reason (But I won't get into that for the moment).

- Public:
At least once every five years the House of Commons is re-elected, and so at that point sovereignty really lies with the people. However, after the general election sovereignty returns to Parliament for the next five years. That sovereignty of parliament however, exists within the legal/lawful framework of our Constitution.

- European Union:
When Britain signed the Treaty of Rome in 1973 (an Act of treason by Edward Heath supported by the FCO and BBC amongst others) it accepted that the status of European law is superior to British law. This has given British courts the power of judicial review over Acts of Parliament. Therefore courts can scrutinize Acts of Parliament, refer them to the European Court of Justice and even suspend those Acts. However, Parliament is free to withdraw Britain from the EU at any time, so technically sovereignty still lies with Parliament.

So, upshot? Yes, Sovereignty lies with Parliament/Executive Branch of government.

HOWEVER, as you can see, at the point of elections, Sovereignty actually lies with the people. It always truly has and that's exactly why "They work for you". So let's say the population woke up one day and realized that the three main parties simply were 3 legs of the same establishment tripod (which they are). And let's even assume that this happened sometime after the Lisbon Treaty was fully ratified.

IF we elected a brand new party into power who we KNEW would remove us from the EU and, because we had realized the con of the false left/right paradigm so we were "on the government's case” and ensured they did as WE THE PEOPLE demanded of them, then that government (whoever it was) - because of the fact that "Parliament cannot bind its successors" - could repeal ALL of the laws and the EU policy within the UK and restore our sovereignty WHICH belongs to US.

What could it do after that? It could re-instate laws which had been repealed such as the TREASON LAWS and we could do what was necessary and just to those who had been elected to office BY the people previously and committed such treason.

Now, you may ask, how can I be sure I'm right? Here's why.

So it would seem from this taken from the UK Parliament website:

 

CHAPTER 3

THE LISBON TREATY AND THE UK CONSTITUTION

In this Chapter, we consider those features of the Lisbon Treaty that appear to have direct implications for the UK constitution.

PARLIAMENTARY SOVEREIGNTY

92. We now consider whether the Lisbon Treaty would change the relationship between EU law and the principle of parliamentary sovereignty. Like the current treaties, the Lisbon Treaty contains no express provision about the principle, enunciated by the ECJ since 1963, that European law takes priority over any inconsistent national law. Under this principle, any national court or tribunal (from a bench of lay magistrates to the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords) must immediately set aside any statutory provision or other rule of national law which is determined to be incompatible with EU law. However, Declaration 17 appended to the Lisbon Treaty does state that "in accordance with well settled case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, the Treaties and the law adopted by the Union on the basis of the Treaties have primacy over the law of Member States, under the conditions laid down by the said case law". Dr Anthony commented, though, that "the questionable legal status of such Declarations may mean that the doctrine can only ever continue to lack an agreed basis" (p 11).

93. The Government told us that the principle of the primacy of EU law-whether formally articulated or not-does not have implications for parliamentary sovereignty:

"Parliament exercised its sovereignty in passing the European Communities Act 1972 and has continued to do so in passing the legislation necessary to ratify subsequent EU Treaties. The UK Parliament could repeal the European Communities Act 1972 at any time. The consequence of such repeal is that the United Kingdom would not be able to comply with its international and EU obligations and would have to withdraw from the European Union. The Lisbon Treaty does not change that and indeed for the first time includes a provision explicitly confirming Member States' right to withdraw from the European Union" (p 21).

94. Dr Anthony told us that it "is highly unlikely that the new Treaty will add anything to debates on the effects of EU membership" on parliamentary sovereignty (p 11). Professor Chalmers agreed (p 14), as did Professor Dashwood who explained that primacy of European Union law "remains a principle developed in the case law of the ECJ" (p 17). We agree with this analysis.

95. We conclude that the Lisbon Treaty would make no alteration to the current relationship between the principles of primacy of European Union law and parliamentary sovereignty. The introduction of a provision explicitly confirming Member States' right to withdraw from the European Union underlines the point that the United Kingdom only remains bound by European Union law as long as Parliament chooses to remain in the Union.
 

HUMAN RIGHTS LEGISLATION WHICH ATTACKS HUMAN RIGHTS!
Here is ANOTHER issue which I picked up on with this "so called" new Bill of Rights:

Recognize the deception in this. Recognize the "one way street" being proposed under the "flag" of Human Rights/Bill of Rights. And remember also that the establishment want you to forget about out existing 1688 Bill of Rights.


The Joint Committee on Human Rights
Background to proposals for a British Bill of
Rights and Duties
Standard Note: SN/PC/04559
Last updated: 3 February 2009

The Joint Committee on Human Rights announced in May 2007 that they would hold an inquiry into a British Bill of Rights. Their report, A Bill of Rights for the UK?, was published on 10 August 2008.

In short, the Committee recommended that the UK should adopt a Bill of Rights and Freedoms "in order to provide necessary protection to all, and to marginalized and vulnerable people in particular".

They stated that:

Adopting a Bill of Rights provides a moment when society can define itself. We recommend that a Bill of Rights and Freedoms should set out a shared vision of a desirable future society: it should be aspirational in nature as well as protecting those human rights which already exist. We suggest that a Bill of Rights should give lasting effect to values shared by the people of the United Kingdom: we include liberty, democracy, fairness, civic duty, and the rule of law.

Just ONE thing. Note: "and the rule of law"

The Committee recommended that some additional rights, such as the right to trial by jury and the right to administrative justice should be included in a Bill of Rights. They also considered the inclusion of environmental rights (or 'third generation' rights as they are known).

 

The Committee did not recommend fully justiciable social or economic rights but a situation where the Government would have a duty to progress towards realizing certain rights of this kind:

We suggest that the Bill of Rights and Freedoms should initially include the rights to education, health, housing and an adequate standard of living. Government would have a duty to progress towards realizing these rights and would need to report that progress to Parliament. Individuals would not be able to enforce these rights through the courts, but the courts would have a role in reviewing the measures taken by Government.

Now, do you recognize it? Do you see the outright deception here? How the Government will PROMOTE "Human Rights" and a "Bill of Rights" BUT, ultimately, it is total nonsense?

No? Then let me explain:

"The Committee did not recommend fully justiciable social or economic rights"

What does that mean? As follows:

Justiciability concerns the limits upon legal issues over which a court can exercise its judicial authority.
Essentially, justiciability seeks to address whether a court possesses the ability to provide adequate resolution of the dispute; where a court feels it cannot offer such a final determination, the matter is not justiciable.

Upshot? If your Human Rights under a Bill of Rights is breached in any way, you don't have recourse to complain. There's NOTHING you can do because the matter is not "justiciable".

You could be beaten to a pulp and thrown in jail because you were a vocal dissenter with ANYTHING the government did and you would have NO comeback. (I hark back to my issue in Singapore)

Therefore bottom line: YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS. And, it will only get worse if we allow it to by our apathy. Do NOT make the mistake of thinking it will never impact your life. It does today and will tomorrow.

Yet, how would you respond to this:

"A Human being is born free and with unalienable rights. As long as a human being causes no harm, loss or injury to another human being then there is no higher authority which has power over that "person" (be careful with the word "person"). Statutory Legislation (Statute law) is NOT law, in fact, but is given the force of law by the governed.

 

Statute law is, in fact, a form of commercial law and, as such, is a form of contract. In being such, it requires an actual contractual agreement between both parties and, therefore, the "person" must accept to contract with the organization wishing to enforce such statute law upon him".

Think about the above.

 

There ARE no “rights” if they can be taken away - which they are now and have been many times in history. They are granted “privileges” yet you must ask yourself very fundamental questions here such as:

“Which person or group has a right, under law, to strip me of MY rights - my inalienable rights - under ANY circumstances at all UNLESS I cause, harm, injury or loss to another?”

The answer to this question can only be this: No-one!

Continuing the Sovereignty/Constitution/Treason issue:

The basis for the coronation oath, which forms part of the coronation ceremony, is enshrined in statute in the Coronation Oath Act 1689. This Act required the King William and Queen Mary, as joint monarchs, to swear an oath during the coronation ceremony. The Act of Settlement 1701 and the Accession Declaration Act 1910 make a statutory requirement on the monarch to take the coronation oath.

The legal obligations surrounding the oath are set out in Halsbury's Laws:

28. The Crown's duty towards the subject. The essential duties of the Crown towards the subject are now to be found expressed in the terms of the oaths which every monarch is required to take before or at the coronation.

 

The duties imposed by the coronation oath are:

  1. to govern the peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the dominions etc belonging or pertaining to them according to their respective laws and customs

  2. to cause law and justice in mercy to be executed in all judgments, to the monarch's power

  3. to maintain the laws of god, the true profession of the Gospel, and the protestant reformed religion established by law, to the utmost of the Sovereign's power

By the Act of Settlements 4, it is declared that 'whereas the laws of England are the birthright of the people thereof and all the kings and queens who shall ascend the throne of this realm ought to administer the government of the same according to the said laws and all their officers and ministers ought to serve them respectively according to the same...the same are....ratified and confirmed accordingly.

On 12 February 1688 a declaration was drawn up affirming the rights and liberties of the people and conferring the crown upon William and Mary, then Mary's children, and, failing any heirs, Princess Anne and her heirs; and failing also that, William's heirs.

 

Once the declaration had been accepted by William and Mary, it was published as a proclamation. The declaration was subsequently enacted with some additions in the form of the Bill of Rights 1688, and the Acts of the Convention Parliament were subsequently ratified and confirmed by the Crown and Parliament Recognition Act 1689 which also acknowledged the King and Queen.

 

In this way, the Bill of Rights was confirmed by a Parliament summoned in a constitutional manner and thereby acquired the force of a legal statute and appears as such on the statute book.

I won't copy here the Bill of Rights WE HAVE since you can find them online at your leisure.

What I WILL say is this however:

There is a working document in Parliament named "The Governance of Britain".

July 2007 Green Paper on constitutional reform, "The Governance of Britain".

 

The note sets out each proposal and progress made since the publication of the Green Paper, including the contents of the Constitutional Renewal White Paper and draft Bill published in March 2008. The Government has said that it will bring forward legislation "when time allows".

One of the FOUR major proposals in it is as follows:

Britain's Future: the citizen and the state - this included a discussion of the need to develop a British Statement of Values, and perhaps a British Bill of Rights.

No British Constitution and Bill of Rights? Today, you hear Parliament, Government and media discussing "A British Bill of Rights" WHEN WE ACTUALLY HAVE ONE!!

But the fact we have one is hushed up! Ever wondered why?

On 25 March 2008 the Government published a White Paper and Draft Bill, The Governance of Britain: Constitutional Renewal.

Speaking in the debate on the Queen's Speech, Jack Straw responded to questions on the status of the constitutional renewal proposals as follows:

...The constitutional reform Bill is specified in the Gracious Speech. Everyone knows that what has changed since then is the overriding imperative of dealing with the world economic downturn, but the Bill will require parliamentary time.

 

The Queen's Speech states:

"My Government will continue to take forward proposals on constitutional renewal, including strengthening the role of Parliament and other measures."

As ever, Her Majesty meant what she said-and that is my intention, too.

The Governance of Britain Green Paper was published by the Government a matter of days after Gordon Brown became Prime Minister. The Labour administrations of 1997-2007 oversaw major changes to the constitutional structures and systems of the United Kingdom including the establishment of devolved administrations in Scotland Wales and Northern Ireland and the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law.

And THAT is what this is all about. The entire Constitutional debate and the promotion of "a British Bill of Rights" (when we already have one) and changes to the Act of Settlement etc, is to have us slot into Europe - NOT to think first of the rights of British Citizens. It's got nothing whatsoever to do with us and the government AGAIN are pulling the wool over our eyes.

The Green Paper echoes several proposals for constitutional change by the Liberal Democrats in their 2007 paper Real Democracy for Britain, and by the Conservative Party's Democracy Task Force, chaired by Kenneth Clarke.

Ken Clarke: Constitutional reform chaired by “MR. BILDERBERG”.

And as “Mr Bilderberg”, he works alongside Mr. Blair and Mr. Brown to ACHIEVE what they are trying to achieve because BEFORE these people work for the British people and British Government THEY WORK FOR THE AGENDA OF BILDERBERG AND THE BANKERS WHO "OWN" them. Once the goals are achieved, they personally do pretty well for themselves. as you may realize later.

Who, in this country of ours, would suggest that the present government under Blair and Brown’s leadership, has conducted itself in the best interests of the British Public?

We have had broken promises: No Referendum on the EU Constitution/Lisbon Treaty.

Illegal Wars fought but NOT in our name and for an elite agenda which is obvious when one has studied the subject in depth.

Gold sold at less than market price by what would appear to be a Chancellor of exceptional incompetence. However, let’s have a closer look at this gold sale. Is it possible there was a much larger agenda at work here while certain people end their career in No.10 doing very well for themselves?

Read this... http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article1655001.ece

"Among five exemptions it has claimed to block publication is that “such information relates to the location (past or present) of the UK’s gold holdings, which, if made known, could increase risks to security”.

 

This information is on the Bank’s official website."

Now consider this... http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/survey/so/2007/INT051B.htm

“First, the amount is limited to the portion of the Fund's gold - about 400 tons - that had been sold and repurchased in a transaction about seven years ago.

Second, the sales should be fitted in with the existing sales programs of central banks, mainly European ones, so that they won't result in any additional gold sales.

Third, the IMF should set up a group that examines the technicalities of the marketing of gold.”

Coincidence?

Now unless I'm mistaken, this secrecy about who bought the gold is still under wraps but let me just add this, as you will clearly recognize, there was no-one else selling 400 tons of gold in that timescale except Gordon Brown and Tony Blair. Not that I am aware of.

So, again: Coincidence?

Now let's think this through a little.

 

JP Morgan were involved in the meeting with Brown when discussing the sale of 400 tons of gold.

  • The IMF publication referred to, has the JP Morgan International President stating the IMF bought 400 tons in the very same timescale.

  • Tony Blair leaves 10 Downing Street to land a windfall $2M/yr job with guess who? JP Morgan!

Who “pimped” our Tony to the Banking establishment? Evelyn and Lynn De Rothschild.

 

Cozy isn’t it?

It is transparent. Unless the government wishes to open the entire detail of the gold sale to the public to prove otherwise but, as with so many of the government’s “little secrets” it is deemed “ Not in the Public interest”.

This phrase is a wonderful, all encompassing phrase which is actually extremely deceptive. What it honestly means is that it is “Not in the establishment’s interest that the public are aware”. The reality is that it is ENTIRELY in the public’s interest to recognize the sheer scale of corruption which is carried out by our government and establishment.

Think, for a moment, about the case of Hollie Greig and the arrest of Robert Green in Aberdeen on charges of “breach of the peace”. What “breach”? What exactly did the man do? Answer: Nothing.

 

What he was about to do was to bring it to the public’s attention that there had been long term sexual abuse of a Down Syndrome child over a period of 14 years and members of the establishment were implicated while other members covered it all up.

 

The “breach of the peace” was solidly based upon the point that such information being brought to light would, in establishment terms, not be “In the Public interest”.

 

Does this crystallize for you what “In the public interest” actually means? Is it “in the public interest” for me to write this article?

 

An expression of my thinking and simple straightforward questions which my representatives in government refuse to answer. Would this be construed then as a “breach of the peace”? If so, then what exactly is this “freedom and democracy’?


Someone once asked me the question,

"And since the treason laws apply to all who take the oath of allegiance, how can the Sovereign commit treason when they don't take that oath? No one takes an oath to themselves surely?"

Answer: Precisely! The Queen does NOT take an Oath to herself.

What is an Oath? It is to swear one shall carry out responsibilities. The CORONATION OATH is just that.

Meanwhile, the QUEEN is NOT the MONARCHY. That is, the flesh and blood person of the Queen is NOT the MONARCHY. The flesh and blood person of the Queen takes on the RESPONSIBILITY of the MONARCHY and is therefore the MONARCH.

The MONARCH is there to uphold the LAWS of this country. OUR SOVEREIGNTY has been established by our having it protected FOR US by the MONARCHY.

Think of the Queen (and all those monarchs before her) as simply the CEO of a CORPORATION.

IF the CEO of a Corporation was found to be guilty of not performing their duties and actually, perhaps, working against (embezzlement for instance) the LAWS/POLICIES of the Corporation, they would be sacked and very possibly jailed. They have, in effect, committed a treason of sorts.

Now, the Queen (the human being) is JUST that! She swears an oath. Again, the question remains: To who?

Meanwhile, it gets a little more complex because of the Sovereignty of PARLIAMENT.

The Queen actually holds the sovereignty of the PEOPLE of the UK. The PARLIAMENT work against this (actually the Executive Branch of the Government) to strip away the sovereignty of the PEOPLE FROM Her Majesty. They promote such as giving more "power" to Parliament and Parliament being elected by the people etc....

The PROBLEM lies in the fact that the people, generally, are apathetic, disinterested etc. So what happens is that the government hype the "benefits" of Constitutional change while what they are actually doing is subverting it to allow accession to the EU.

So then:

"if a man do levy war against our lord the King in his realm, or be adherent to the King's enemies in his realm, giving to them aid and comfort in the realm, or elsewhere"; comes into play doesn't it?

For, remember, enemies NEED NOT use bombs and guns to wage war when their aims may be achieved by subversion, stealth and economic means.

The Queen (the human being), by acquiescing to the government's agenda, is in breach of her Constitutional DUTY and she is NOT protecting the subjects of "her" Kingdom.

She has signed ALL EU treaties. She is allowing the sovereignty of the nation to be passed into the hands of a subversive government who are then passing OUR sovereignty to a FOREIGN POWER.
 


THE PRIVY COUNCIL
Taken from the UK Parliament website:

The Privy Council is an ancient and dignified institution of government, which has its origins in the earliest days of the monarchy.

 

The Privy Council goes back to the earliest days of the monarchy, when it comprised those appointed by the King or Queen to advise on matters of state.

  1. Monarchs would rule through the Privy Council without turning to Parliament, and under Edward I it was difficult to identify whether legislative acts emanated from the King-in-Parliament or the King-in- Council.

  2. Throughout the 14th century, however, there was a great deal of friction between the Council and Parliament, and in the reigns of Henry IV and Henry V there is evidence of the Commons petitioning the King against the jurisdiction seized by the Council.

By this time the Council was exercising judicial powers in relation to both criminal and civil litigation with enforcement of the criminal law (where offences against the State were alleged or officers of State were involved) carried out by the Court of Star Chamber. Parliament therefore objected that the Star Chamber was usurping the function of the common law courts.

With the rise of the Cabinet system of government in the 18th century, the Privy Council gradually lost much of its powers.

Membership of the Privy Council is today a titular honor, with the office recognized as a reward for public and political service. Appointments are made by the Sovereign on ministerial advice and are for life - there are no fixed numbers of Members. By convention, all present and past Cabinet Members are appointed to the Privy Council.

 

Also included in the membership are members of the royal family, senior judges, two Archbishops, British Ambassadors, the Speaker of the House of Commons, Prime Minister and Cabinet Members, present and former leaders of the Opposition, and leading Commonwealth spokesmen and judges.

 

The Council now numbers about 420 members, and members are entitled to the prefix 'Right Honorable.'

Now, THEIR OATH is as follows (in part):

"You will to your uttermost bear Faith and Allegiance to the Queen's Majesty; and will assist and defend all civil and temporal Jurisdictions, Pre-eminences, and Authorities, granted to Her Majesty and annexed to the Crown by Acts of Parliament, or otherwise, against all Foreign Princes, Persons, Prelates, States, or Potentates."

ALL FOREIGN PRINCES, PERSONS, PRELATES, STATES OR POTENTATES.

WHAT IS THE EU? IT IS A FOREIGN STATE NOT OF THE REALM!

It requires those taking it to 'keep secret all matters... treated of in Council.'

 

The Oath (or solemn affirmation for those who cannot take an Oath) is still administered, and is still binding, but it is only in very special circumstances nowadays that matters will come to a Privy Counsellor on "Privy Council terms". These will mostly concern matters of the national interest where it is important for senior members of Opposition parties to have access to Government information.

Despite the many powers conferred by statutes on individual ministers, the Order in Council remains a principal method of giving the force of law to acts of the government, especially the more important executive orders.


The Judicial Committee has also in the past examined and reported on matters of constitutional importance, such as the legal basis of the practice of telephone tapping and matters affecting state security. A committee of six Privy Counsellors reviewed British policy towards the Falkland Islands leading up to Argentina's invasion in 1982; after the Prime Minster had consulted with five former Prime Ministers to secure their consent, the committee had access to the papers of previous governments and secret intelligence assessments.

I have also written to Mr Malcolm Chisholm MSP on this subject who has suggested he would defer the entire question back to Mark Lazarowicz MP as it is, in Mr Chisholm’s words “A UK matter and not a devolved matter” (unlike the Hollie Greig issue which Mr Lazarowicz deferred on to Malcolm Chisholm!).

I brought the following David Cameron speech to Malcolm’s attention:

“Never again should it be possible for a British Government to transfer power to the EU without the say of the British people in a referendum.”

The European Communities Act 1972 can be amended to prohibit, by law, the transfer of power to the EU without a referendum.

“This is a major constitutional development... Powers cannot be given away without their EXPLICIT approval... after all, it is not politicians’ power to give away. The power belongs to the people.”

See and hear the entire speech below:

 

 


Now, while Mr. Cameron goes on to make promises and speak of “made up referendums which would not stand serious scrutiny” the fact is he has drawn a line under what has ALREADY been done by the British Government and DOES NOT STAND SERIOUS SCRUTINY within the terms of our Constitution!

 

He EVADES this yet he has stated CORRECTLY that the powers which the people of this country PROVIDE to our government DO NOT INCLUDE the power to hand such powers to a foreign entity such as the EU or ANY foreign entity.

Our constitutional documents are entirely clear on this and our government (successive ones since Heath’s government of 1972 when he signed the EC Act 1972 - Sedition and treason according to Constitutional law) have proceeded to do exactly that.

So, in ending this article, unless someone (anyone) can actually refute the above content and what I am convinced 100% is the situation here (without simply attempting the evasion of Ken Clarke that is), I would put this to you very firmly: The sovereignty of the United Kingdom is being attacked from without and such individuals, Banks and Corporations involved in this attack, are being collaborated with from within.

 

That is nothing short of war. It is true to suggest it is, to an extent, also an “Infowar” since the people progressing this agenda know exactly what they are doing while the vast majority of the populace are in blissful ignorance while they stare at the TV news and wonder what is happening to our country.

Meanwhile, our present monarch, Elizabeth II, swears an Oath during her coronation to US, the people and to the OFFICE of the Monarchy. If she did NOT swear such an Oath, then just as William and Mary were offered the Monarchy/Crown on the AGREEMENT and ACCEPTANCE of their DUTY as Monarch, if Elizabeth had NOT sworn such an Oath, she would NOT have been crowned Queen.

 

Our entire body of law in this country flows from the Constitution and the requirements and oaths taken by those who PROTECT that Constitution. If those highest of laws can be broken in an effort to progress an agenda which Mr. Rockefeller states so clearly has been his aim, then is it any wonder why our country finds itself in a state of near anarchy?

 

An anarchy not brought on by the people but orchestrated by our very government while our “justice” system does not provide Justice but a purely revenue-driven, “corporatisation” and corrupt version of “justice”.

The question is:

Has Elizabeth knowingly and purposefully broken her oath - as have our Privy Council and our Parliamentarians over decades - or have her hands been tied and she has been coerced?

Bilderberg and New World Order and the subversion of our British Constitution is no silly “Conspiracy theory”. It is a deadly serious matter and is as clear as can be ONCE you do a little study, sit up and take notice and connect a few dots.

To ignore it or state “What can I do about it?” is NOT good enough. If you truly care for your children and, perhaps, THEIR children, then you have a duty to them. A duty to ensure that their world is a safe, non corrupt and free world. I have two children.

 

Their happiness and to inherit a peaceful world is my ultimate goal.

People talk of “We’re British”. We have millions of people every week attending football matches and thousands attending England and Scotland International matches who suggest they strongly believe in their nation. I have to tell you, supporting a football team while you speak of being proud of your nation is all hot air and has no substance when you allow to happen what I have just tried to explain to you.

The way forward in overcoming this threat however, is through an understanding of it and educating others then using that knowledge intelligently and peacefully to drive the change and ensure those who have committed these crimes are held accountable.

This is the final part regarding the UK Constitution that has been extremely complex but none the less extremely important. I sincerely hope that some readers will take time out to study it in great deal and realize that all the political parties are taking away out country brick by brick.


The current series will continue on with Part 7 which will cover the New World Orders intimidation of Iran and their concerns regarding the possibility of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons. It will reveal how both the US and the UK allowed nuclear weapons to be stolen and yet at the same time also reveal that these shonky deals became private transactions with the political elite involved, their parties and the arms dealer.

 

Basically we can say with great confidence that we gave nuclear weapons away to countries who they now call “The Axis of Evil.”


It is so sordid and corrupt that those involved are still playing leading roles in the politics of today. They have become smart and arrogant and think they are untouchable by law. Because of this gross neglect millions have died unnecessarily and some of those key players are now attempting to clear their names via the Chilcot inquiry.

 

This Iraq Inquiry is an absolute farce and certainly does not go back far enough to encompass these missing nukes. Cameron, Blair, Brown and many others on both sides of the pond certainly have a lot to answer for.

 

However the New World Order protects its own with unlimited cash that was stolen from the taxpayers of the world... will we see justice prevail?... will we see heads roll?

Back to Contents


 



 

Part 7

New World Order Threats, Neglects
15 April 2010 18:21


This article on the New World Order (NWO) will cover some aspects of the build up to the Iraqi and Afghan Wars and how the public was hoodwinked into believing that Iraq was a threat to the west.

 

It will show how deceitful, two faced and ruthless our leaders, military commanders, secret services, international banker, pharmaceutical companies and weapons manufacturers are.

It will reveal how important it is for war and conflict to be permanently part of our world in order to satisfy their greed for control of the world’s natural resources.

 

How they will go to war in order to implement a long term project that will reap in trillions of dollars. How they will set up “False Flag” incidents so as to justify their actions.

 

How they are prepared to sell or use Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) or Chemical and Biological Warfare (CBW) in order to achieve their goals.


It will prove how the US, UK, EU and Israel are violating almost every Geneva Convention in their past and current use of WMD’s in all theaters of war. The knock on effect of our respective military actions is basically genocide on a huge scale and no doubt fits in with the NWO policy of depopulation. It will show how the NWO is prepared to sacrifice its own respective populations for their aggressive greed by creating these “False Flag” events such as Oklahoma Bombing and 9/11 etc.


Lets again go back in time and see not only how totally immoral/ethical our leaders were and still are, but also how they are prepared to do under the table deals in order to create wealth for their own purposes.

 

It will reveal that although they condemn WMDs and CBW’s they not only design and manufacture them but also frequently sell them to a country that favors their own imperialistic growth.

 

Such organizations as the WB/IMF only have one purpose in life and that is to put a country into untold debt and then demand a drawdown on the money loaned with a huge profit margin.

 

The conditions attached to these loans basically hands over the country to western control and eliminates any trade barriers.

 

The knock-on effect from this is basically to kill the countries domestic markets/trade and allow the west to infiltrate and take over those markets. It also tends to take over public sector utilities such as power supply and water etc, making them totally private with the associated escalating costs.


Basically this puts most utilities out of reach of the poor. Those that do have a little surplus available cash are then drained of their earning and this then plunges them into deeper poverty.

 

This is the NWO’s strategy to take over, control and make all people subservient to those in authority.

The term “Make Poverty History” is an absolute joke and companies such as the US Giant Monsanto are a classic example of devious and aggressive marketing... as a result of their Imperialistic push in India for example… we now see the highest suicide rate of farmers in the world.

 

These poor farmers, with whom I have spent much time, are forced to buy their GM (Genetic Modified) seeds which are totally reliant on Herbicides and Pesticide.

 

This then forces the Farmer to also buy the Monsanto Pesticides in order for the crops to flourish. After some years the soil dies and the farmer has to relocate. Local traditional seed banks are then destroyed leaving them with no choice but to continue buying the GM seed. They are not allowed, once signed up with Monsanto, to save any local seed crop.

 

The farmers basically remain in debt for most of their life and then take the easy way out!


We can start this timeline with another incident involving three missing UK Battlefield Nuclear Bombs that were basically ready to use.

 

For many years prior to this sordid deal South Africa had developed nuclear weapons. They had, with the help of Israeli nuclear experts, made a total of 10 nuclear bombs. One was test fired on a moored vessel near to Prince Edward Island well south of South Africa leaving 9 bombs in storage.


It became clear that white control of South Africa was fast loosing power and that soon a regime change would have to take place. One must also understand that in addition to these nuclear weapons they were also working on Chemical and Biological Weapons both of which were known to both the US and UK governments.

 

However the UN were not informed or even aware of their advancement into producing and testing nuclear weapons.

 

During this period the “Iron Lady” herself (Margaret Thatcher), was fast loosing popularity and desperately needed some funds in the Tory Coffers. The South African Government were extremely concerned that power in South Africa would soon be handed to the black community and did not want these nuclear weapons to fall into their hands.
 

The US still claim to this day that they knew nothing of the nuclear test, despite the fact that their satellites had pick up a double flash that one normally associates with a nuclear a test.

One senior SA Naval Officer did confirm that the test had been carried out and another source confirmed that the US did know.

 

It was also a known fact that the nuclear experts at Los Alamos issued a brief to their own associates (limited distribution). This confirmed that the observation was a nuclear test. The reference for this is Hones, E.W., D.N. Baker, and W.C. Feldman, Evaluation of Some Geophysical Events on 22 September 1979 (for limited distribution only), LA-8672-MS, 1980.


After discussion with the US and UK governments it was decided to ship the 9 remaining nukes from Pelindaba (the SA nuclear facility) via the Port of Durban directly to Chicago. However, prior to this event taking place it was decided that it may be a good idea for Britain to take 3 of the battlefield nukes and have them on standby for Iraq.


In 1989, David Cameron, a young politician at the time went down to South Africa with another more technical political figure to discuss how this could be achieved.


Sir Kenneth Warren also had his finger in the pie to help bring all this together.


Those involved were a company called Armscor (The South African Arms Trading Company), Astra (A British Arms Company) and the middle man, arms dealer John Bredenkamp.

 

John Major also became part of this shonky deal as did Mark Thatcher and many private investors. What was also unusual about this, under the table covert operation, was the involvement of the British DTI, rather than just the MOD. The money for acquiring these weapons was processed via the MOD but the whole deal was arranged via the DTI for some strange reason! Not normal don’t you think?

In order to keep this out of Parliament and out of the public domain Maggie Thatcher was asked to sign off these weapons under a special Urgent Operational Requirement (UOR) and was shown as metal cylinders and not nuclear bombs. This was done completely under the table and this knowledge was not known to anyone else.

 

The UOR document was signed before she left office in late 1990.

The next phase was that once the weapons had left South African soil, arrived at destination and physically checked, the British Government would then reimburse ARMSCOR (SA) and Astra (UK) and the middle man, arms dealer John Bredenkemp all at the expense of the British Tax Payer.

 

I must also add that around this same time the Thatcher Government was also actively involved in overseeing Chemical and Biological Warfare (CBW) in both South Africa and at Porton Down, UK.

We know that Dr. David Kelly (above image) had himself been visiting South Africa on behalf of the British Government regarding the CBW but was also responsible for the safe delivery of the three SA/UK nukes from Durban to Oman.

 

Dr. Kelly also frequently hosted the SA CBW team at Porton Down etc.


It was Dr. Kelly’s own responsibility to make sure the three nukes were safe for transit and also to receive them in Oman and sign them off, prior to the release of monies. Dr. Kelly had first hand knowledge of this under the table deal and also knew much about the sexed up document “Iraq Dossier" that Alistair Campbell had carefully manipulated.

 

Kelly had also been part of the team to check out Iraq regarding the WMD’s. He knew that there was no case for going to war and threatened to become a sort of whistleblower… that cost him his life and he was assassinated when they knew that he could blow the lid on the whole issue and that this could sink Blair and the Labour Government... as well as incriminating the Tories and David Cameron.


As I have already discussed in a previous article, a B52 bomber crashed into the sea north of Diego Garcia in February 1991.

 

This aircraft was carrying SRAM Nuclear Missiles (the earlier version of today’s Cruise Missile). These earlier weapons were extremely unstable and in the event of some in flight emergency one would truly have to plan what to do with your lethal cargo load. The B52 could carry around many more of these SRAM’s but we are told there were only three onboard.


All of this was under the watchful eye of Dick Cheney who was US Secretary of Defense at the time. It became clear that he was in a very serious position, especially when US intelligence believed that the weapons had been recovered (stolen) and then sold by a notorious arms dealer John Bredenkamp. It became apparent that Dick Cheney had not made any attempt to find or recover these weapons until after May of the same year and furthermore had not attempted to report them as missing.


Stephen P. Dresch, a former American forensic intelligence officer with the CIA had valuable information about Cheney.

 

This was indeed a very serious oversight by Cheney which clearly violated international law.

 

The SRAM’s had W-69 nuclear warheads and it was believed at the time that they were sold to Iran… This is why intelligence officers are trying to track down Bredenkamp for a “False Flag” BAe deal in order to get him in custody and then try to find out from him who received the missing weapons. It was believed at the time that John Bredenmap received around 8.5 tons of gold for the deal.


I read an article relating to Dresh’s knowledge of Cheney’s neglect and one other very interesting comment:

“Stephen's full report would show that Dick Cheney in 2002 had a reason for wanting to see the Iraq Dossier sexed-up with the false report on Yellowcake from Niger.

 

Humphry Crum Ewing was political adviser on military and intelligence matters to John Major at No.10 Downing Street at the time and he told recently that even though he had never heard of the event with the B-52 losing the nukes, because of other things that he knew, to him it made complete sense."

You may say what has this to do with the New World Order?

 

The answer is simply an awful lot because it’s all part of the “False Flag” and deceit that this organization hands out on a regular basis. They are prepared to do almost anything to achieve their master plan. If this involves selling weapons to your potential enemy, then that is fine! If it involves killing thousands such as 9/11 then that is also ok!

 

If it means telling the world that you are reducing ballistic nuclear weapons when in actual fact you are mass producing smaller nukes and telling the public that these are conventional weapons, then that’s how it goes! If you intentionally sell WMD or CBW to use against someone you don’t like then that is also ok!

 

Finally if you ignore good intelligence advice and still go to war or leak secret or highly confidential information to an ally then that’s the name of the game.


As an example:

 

Ex-CIA agent says Bush ignored WMD intelligence

The CIA's former top official in Europe has revealed that President Bush ignored intelligence that Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction.

 

The CIA had evidence Iraq possessed no weapons of mass destruction six months before the 2003 U.S.-led invasion but was ignored by White House intent on ousting Saddam Hussein, a former senior CIA official said according to CBS.

 

The official, Tyler Drumheller, said former CIA Director George Tenet personally told Bush and Vice President Cheney that Iraq’s foreign minister had admitted to U.S. spies that Iraq had no WMD program. Drumheller said the information was ignored.

 

He told 60 Minutes:

"The policy was set. The war in Iraq was coming and they were looking for intelligence to fit into the policy.”

Then there was the case when Condoleezza Rice was accused of leaking highly classified military intelligence on Iran to a pro-Israel lobbyist in the same manner that landed a lower-level Pentagon official a 12-year prison sentence. The allegation was in regard to two former lobbyists from AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

 

The lobbyists were charged with receiving and disclosing national defense information. Lawyers for the men asked a federal judge to subpoena Rice to testify in order to show that top Bush administration officials approved of disclosing sensitive information to the defendants and that the leaks may have been authorized.


Then there was the suppression of Israeli War Crimes and a huge list of other Human Rights issue in Palestine that was totally blanked out in the UK regarding shellings, killings, robberies, savage beatings, attacks on schools and infrastructure, home demolitions, kidnappings, the use of sewage as a weapon, and more. Virtually all of these Israeli government, military and settler crimes went unreported.


Obviously the Goldstone report and many other reports are all now swept under the carpet thanks to AIPAC and their influence in US Congress. The same applies in the UK with the Friends of Israel lobby group handing out huge backhanders in return for favors... yes my friends this is all linked to the bigger picture including the New World Order and the Freemasons etc.

Just when you think you have heard it all we have “Project Coast” down in South Africa that involved the use of CBW to reduce the black population in Africa…

 

This project was refereed to as being the “Black only Bomb”... we can go back even further when CBW was used in the old Rhodesia with the full support of the British Government.

 

All of this was known to dear Maggie Thatcher (our then Prime Minister), John Major who took over, that young flamboyant politician David Cameron… not forgetting Sir KW and sidekick DW.

 

This knowledge also extended over the pond to the US President, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and so many others of the crooked political elite.


When one links all of this together with the missing nukes and realise that not only did we get it all wrong but we also went to war with the wrong country (if it was ever justified anyway). We are talking here about an extremely serious crime... Tony Blair could fall victim to the special Jail provisions as contained in his Nuclear Explosions Act of 1998.

 

This not only involved all those listed above but also senior members of the British Labour Party who became privy to this information. When one considers that millions have died in Iraq and Afghanistan (without even counting our own coalition forces) as a direct result of their imperialistic greed and deceit is beyond words.


All these senior political elite are part of the New World Order and it doesn’t stop there... what about the CBW attack on the Iranians and the Kurds... this know how and the appropriate means to carry out these attacks was masterminded by the US, UK and other EU countries...

 

As I said, there is no limit to the level to which they will go… how can you place a vote to any party that has such dirty washing to hang out?

Dr. David Kelly was a very brave man but knew too much and paid the ultimate price for caring for his country and for not wanting us to go to war over these lies.

 

There are many other David Kelly’s around with the same information and soon the bubble will burst... the Chilcot Inquiry was an absolute disgrace and a total farce…we should all demand this worthless inquiry to be revisited and for the truth to come out!


What is so frightening now is the fact that the G3.5, as I call it (US, UK, France and Germany), are again on an advanced war footing with Iran. We have the usual over reactive response from Israel, despite the fact that they themselves will not allow the world to checks their own nuclear activities!

 

They have such powerful military might for a country so small and a nuclear arsenal of WMD’s that continues to grow unchecked. They sit on the sideline crying like a little lamb searching for its mother! All of them together as now trying to rally for support from other nations so as to apply direct pressure on the UN which they control anyway.

 

Obama (The New World Order’s Chosen One) is spreading fear into the hearts of people regarding terrorism and concern about nuclear weapons falling into the wrong hands.

 

I have to say that,

“Nuclear Weapons and CBW have already fallen into the wrong hands, namely - US, UK, EU and Israel!"

  • Can we say with any sincerity that the world can trust these countries?

  • Could it be that they themselves are the “Axis of Evil”?

  • Does Al Qaeda and any terrorism, on the scale they tell us about, really exist?

The answer is simply no… they have conjured up an imaginary army to justify the creation of a police state in all of their countries and re enforced this with many “False Flag” incidents to shock us all into believing it.

 

Surely even with basic education you do not believe these “New World Monster” that walk the corridors of our governments and organizations such as:

The list is almost endless and never ending.


Back to Contents


 

 



 

Part 8

Leaders put their own countries at risk
20 April 2010


In Part 7 we covered a couple on incidents that revealed the greed and neglect of the US and UK Government.

 

It clearly shows that the New World Order (NWO) will go to any length to either fulfill their master plan, attract funds to their coffers or to, in some cases have their own palms brushed with gold.

The deplorable actions and gross neglect as carried out by past Presidents George Bush Senior and Junior and the UK Prime Ministers Thatcher, Major, Blair and Brown are beyond words.

 

These elitists, that are supposed to not only govern out countries but also to protect us, do in actual fact put us all at great risk.
 

If you can recall I discussed the circumstances leading up to the theft of 3 nuclear weapons belonging to the US and the theft of another three nuclear weapons that belonged to the UK. It became clear that in case of the US SRAM missiles there was some intentional delay by Dick Cheney in his attempt to recover them.

 

They were dumped into the ocean in early February 1991 but no attempt to recover them was made until May of the same year, by which time they had been stolen.


The story was all hinged around a Seychelles deep sea diving/treasure salvage team who were in actual fact part of a South African arms smuggling operation into Somalia. These groups were responsible for the recovery of dumped weapons off the coast and bringing them to onshore Somalia. It was after the B52 had jettisoned its unstable nuclear weapons load off the coast of Somalia that this bogus diving company came across the nukes, took details from the ID plate on the missiles and after some enquires found them to be the US SRAM missiles.


John Bredenkamp was linked to this arms smuggling/gun running exercise and benefited significantly from the sale of the US nukes... I am led to believe we are looking at a payment of around 7.5 kgs of gold bullion.

 

It also became apparent that the private sector was also involved in this under the radar operation that was never made known to the United Nations or the world media.

It is very important to understand that these Presidents and Prime Ministers really do not care and they use such devious means of obtaining huge amounts of money for their own needs or to increase the cash flow of their political party funds.

 

They are also ruthless in carrying out “False Flag” type operations to enhance or justify an action that embraces their long term strategy. This is typical of the New World Order. It would also be suffice to say that some of the elite Christian Zionists and Jewish Zionists around the world are more than happy to have untold amounts of people exterminated to reach their goals.


It is for this reason that I believe that some of those elite Jewish New World Order members are willing to see the “Genocide” of their Jewish brothers in Israel. It has now been proven that the DU issue is now playing a major role in the contamination of Israel.

 

Add to this the fact that they are also happy for Israel to take up arms against Iran and become literally “The Sacrificial Lamb” to achieve their own goals.


As far as the US missing nukes are concerned it is now obvious that the key players in these lies and deceit were the President at the time George Bush Snr. and Dick Cheney. This was then followed by George Bush Jr. and again Dick Cheney. Basically the rot did not go away and many other very senior US Government and Military officials had their fingers in the pie and as a direct result of their covert operations allowed thousands if not millions of people to die unnecessarily.


They are to this day still trying to find who John Bredenkamp sold them too... the answer to this big question really lies within their own government as they were implicated.

 

Now the US is trying to corner Bredenkamp on some other unrelated deal in order to get him in custody.


It would appear that the first North Korean nuclear explosion or attempted explosion was one of those missing weapons… now one can see how things escalate around the world as a direct result of the neglect of these satanic leaders.

 

So who has the other two nuclear weapons…it really doesn’t matter because nuclear weapons have never been used since the second world war and only serve as a deterrent. Our leaders don’t want you to believe that... they would rather spread fear and panic into our minds by telling us that some other country must be stopped from the development of WMD in order to make our streets safer.
 

I would like to add at this stage that the world in general is safe... no such threat exists and no threat from terrorism exists…

 

Its all a make believe scenario by the New World Order to achieve their insane plans of ruling the world, its natural resources and to control the populations in a police state type environment.

President Obama is playing out a screen acting role of pretending to stop WMD’s when in actual fact he his intensifying the manufacturing of mini WMD’s that the US call “Conventional weapons,” I urge you all to fully understand this is a total cover-up.

 

The US, UK, Coalition Forces and the IDF are very discreetly and secretly using WMD each and every day in all areas of conflict... this is currently in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Gaza, Yemen and Somalia.


This amounts to mass genocide on a big scale involving the populations of the entire Middle East and the World Beyond as well as all their respective troops taking part in such operations.


I had to laugh when I read the other day that Saudi Arabia was well prepared for any potential nuclear fallout from a possible attack on Iran... I have to say that this is absolutely impossible and there is no defense from such an attack.

 

The very fact that Saudi Arabia would turn a blind eye to any US or IDF forces using its territory is a crime against its own Muslim brothers.


In my previous articles I made it totally clear that any attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities would be catastrophic for the entire Middle East. If one can imagine the attacking forces, using in mass, weapons that contain uranium components, on nuclear facilities... one doesn’t need any imagination.


I would like to ask the Arab States (that are US/UK friendly) to reconsider their stance in relation to opposing Iran and look deeper into this emerging plan of the New World Order.

  • Will they support the death and destruction of Islamic Lands (which has already started)?

  • Will they allow US/UK/Coalition/IDF forces to use their territory in any such attack against another fellow Muslim country and will they allow the catastrophic contamination of the entire Middle East?

We are talking here of an initial fallout stretching from West of Turkey to East of Pakistan and India. From North of the Caspian Sea to South of the Arabian Peninsula.

 

This will only take 2 to 3 days at most.

 

The contamination will then spread around the world on the wind and cover most of mother earth within a month. We are looking at a fallout much greater than the bombs dropped on Japan and contamination far greater that Chernobyl... Can the Arab League agree to such an attack. Please do not be brainwashed that your country is prepared for this event... there is no escape from these nano particles that will encircle our countries…even gas masks are no barrier.

 

So to Saudi I say stop pulling the wool over the eyes of your people and see things as they actually are.

To the governments of Kuwait, Bahrain, UAE, Oman, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, and Jordan I urge you to seriously look into the problems that we in the West are currently creating.

 

There is no logic in these wars and threats... its nothing to do with democracy or nuclear disarmament but rather the New World Order strategy to protect the Opium, Drug, Pharmaceutical Industry and to take control of the world’s natural resources or secure major world energy contracts... it has already applied to the Balkans, Georgia, Iraq and Afghanistan.


The US and its allies are now trying to interfere in Yemen and Somalia in order to secure more resources and more importantly establish a major military base in the Gulf of Aden to control the vital shipping lanes into and out of the Red Sea/Suez Canal - Mediterranean. Likewise the trade routes from the US/EU via the Mediterranean to Central and Southeast Asian etc.


I would urge the Arab League to say enough is enough and insist that these wars and conflicts stop immediately. Send all the troops home, close down all “Western Military Bases on Islamic Soil" and start trading instead of fighting.

 

We are killing each other and more importantly we are killing our planet and its residents!!


I could make a long list of the “Elite US Criminals”...  but maybe I would run out of paper... the short list would have to include Bush Snr. and Jnr, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Power, Rice, Bremer, Bolton, Wolfowitz, Schwarskoff and at the top of the list Kissinger...

 

We would also have to add all those who arranged and planned the collapse of the world’s financial markets, namely the Rockafella’s Rothchilds and all those organizations linked with the New World Order who have spread despair and poverty to thousands upon thousands of people.

 

Back to Contents

 

 

 

 


Part 9

British Senior Politicians put UK at risk
23 April 2010
 

In my previous article (Part 8) I discussed the three US nuclear weapons they were dumped in the ocean and then stolen. This gross neglect by the US Government has basically caused the situation that exists today with thousands if not millions dead and for no apparent cause.


In this final part we will look at who were the alleged players in this corrupt under the table deal and why are they still free to roam the country without any further investigation. I suppose some would say that this is covered by the Chilcott Inquiry but that certainly is not true and further more it is a total scam with all parties tightly involved with the current government.

 

We will look at this later on in this article.

So let’s just refresh our minds as to what happened some years ago when the British Government acquired three Battlefield Nuclear Bombs from South Africa which was in total violation of the embargo on Africa.

 

The fact that conservative party representatives also traveled to South Africa to carry out this deal were all in breach of this embargo. The key players in this deal were a British Company called “Astra” who was headed by Gerald James and the South African Company Armscor.

 

In the middle was John Bredenkamp, the same arms dealer who snatched the US ASRAM nuclear missiles from under the nose of the USA. At a political level we have the alleged involvement of Maggie Thatcher and David Cameron who went to South Africa on an all expense paid jolly care of Armscor in 1989. It was believe that Sir Kenneth Warren, who was the only technical person around, also went and possibly David Wiltshire.


We must fully appreciate that what this gang of rogues were doing at the time was not only extremely dangerous but also very foolish to say the least. Can one imagine the ruling government getting involved in Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) and Chemical and Biological Warfare (CBW) without anyone knowing about it?

 

Doing deals under the table away from the eyes of the UN and the British Members of Parliament? Then not only buying these illegal weapons but also relocating them to Oman with no security measurements in place.

 

All this was arranged before the “Iron Lady” left office.

Dr. David Kelly was not only assigned to look after visits from South African CBW experts to Porton Downs, but was also responsible for the safe dispatch and arrival of the nuclear weapons.

 

It was David who signed the bombs off in Oman after he had inspected them which then allowed payment by the MOD via the DTI to all those concerned.


One must keep in mind that these weapons were not secure as we will learn later. As a result of the visit by David Cameron and his sidekick to South Africa the Conservative party were able to take a percentage commission of the purchase and add it to their own election campaign funds. Can you imagine that right from the start the financial paper trail was absolutely flawed?

 

The payment was processed by the DTI and not the normal process via the MOD. The bombs were disguised as being just simple cylinders and were signed off by Maggie Thatcher as an Urgent Operational Requirement (UOR) and in doing so it was not made known to Parliament. It is even possible that Ken Clarke also knew the nuclear situation as some reference was made of him.


The amount of money received by the Conservative Party for this shonky deal was £17.8 million which came out of the payment i.e. British Tax Payers Money.

 

This issued was raised in the House of Commons: HANSARD 22nd June 1993 we can find the following:

 

Column 197
Mr. Hoyle: If the hon. Gentleman will allow me, I shall tell him what information is now given to us. We understand the expenditure and what Tory central office receives. In 1992, central office received £20.7 million. When we asked about that and about company donations, the Tory party told us to look at company accounts.


I repeat: in 1992, the Tories received £20.7 million. When the records were checked by Companies house, only £2.9 million was shown in company accounts. That means that there is a deficit of £17.8 million.

 

We want to know where that £17.8 million came from!

To this day this money has not been accounted for but the Ex-CEO of Astra, Gerald James, certainly knew the paper trail of accounts which was listed on Page 6 of his report.

 

As a matter of interest Gerald James was scheduled to give evidence at another trial called “Matrix Churchill”… Gerald was to have been the Star Witness but the entire trial was scuttled intentionally so as to hide the nuclear issue and the identity of those involved.


Poor Dr. David Kelly knew everything from WMD’s to CBW’s and the true situation in Iraq and for that reason he was assassinated in order to protect the governments reason for going to war. As we know Alastair Campbell sexed up the Iraq Dossier to justify going to war.


Whilst these three weapons were in storage in Oman the loads were switched and the three battlefield nukes were stolen. Obviously with the lack of good security it was easy for John Bredenkamp to do a good deal and onward sell them to another rogue nation. By this time he had accumulated significant wealth.
 

As part of this sordid deal Bernie Ecclestone the F1 guy was able to slip Tony Blair another one million pounds which was written off to the Tobacco Industry but in reality was part of the bomb money.


Again please understand that many of these non ethical leaders form part of the New World Order and seize any opportunity to acquire wealth at no matter the cost. It is also evident that both Blair and Brown were aware of these three missing nukes… the problem was that nobody could discuss the theft or the terrible potential consequences of their neglect due to the fact that this was all under the radar of the UN and most other people.


The three nukes were in Iraq for a little while but then were transported in three ambulances to Syria. That was the last known location of these weapons.
 

So what does all this mean to us, the voting public, when it comes to casting your vote.

 

Would you trust Cameron who took part in this terrible game of find the missing nuke or would you vote for Brown, who knew the truth but did not reveal anything at the Chilcott Inquiry?

Would you vote for Clegg, whose party dismissed Jenny Tonge because the Israeli Lobby Group objected to her statements?

 

Jenny always told things as they were and she really believed that Palestine had become the victim of Israeli aggression. It was obvious that the Lib Dem Friends of Israel had received a substantial donation for their election party funds and turned their back on Jenny in order to protect their investment.


Let’s now turn our attention to the so called impartial Chilcott Inquiry. Was this a fair and honest inquiry or was it a total scam so as to allow the New World Order puppets to clear their respective names and come out clean?


So why was this Chilcott Inquiry so important... it was part of the New World Orders plan to get Blair off the hook so that he can become the EU President... the current holder is purely acting as a caretaker until the Chilcott inquiry clears Blair.


I believe that if Brown gets to fall behind in the polls he may well draw out his ace card which is to bleat on Blair in order to gain some ground. What is very interesting here is the fact that if all of the Conservative and Labour elite could be connected to this unspeakable crime then they would all end up in jail together under the Nuclear Explosions Act.


It remains clear, prior to the Gulf War, that Bush and Blair wanted a regime change. It is also clear that if nuclear weapons are a valid reason for going to war then we went to war with the wrong country. Can we ever imagine that such a terrible mistake was made resulting in millions of civilian lives being lost and for what?

 

Add to this the thousands of soldiers killed or who were contaminated by the weapons that contained uranium components and the trillion of dollars of tax payer’s money that has paid for these wars.

 

Now we see the New World Orders master plan coming into existence with the forced financial collapse, company closures, mass unemployment, loss of home and the communities totally raped of their basic requirements.

The next step is to further tax the poor and bring everyone down to a mere existence with cutbacks in education, health and social care making everyone subservient to the superior elite.


Before leaving the final part of this series, many of you would ask how could nuclear weapons go missing, how do we know this actually happened and why hasn’t anyone talked about it.

 

The answer is very simple… the culprits that became involved in this under the table corrupt covert operation could not reveal anything outside of their close circle of friends as it was all in violation of the South African Embargo and also the fact it was hidden from the United Nations.

 

This is why John Bredenkamp was allowed to do whatever he wanted knowing that he had the politicians under his thumb… they basically were gagged because of their involvement in this highly illegal operation.


So how do we know these weapons actually moved from South Africa to Oman? First you have to understand that when you are shipping such sensitive and extremely dangerous items one has to send out tenders and then decide how to move them. Obviously it cannot be done in the conventional way and so these three weapons had to be moved very discreetly.

 

The main plan was to use some out of the way location and obtain equipment that could handle the weapons (hence the tenders).


Once they arrived in Oman they would be stored in a facility that was indirectly controlled by Bredenkamp, knowing that he could, at a later stage, arrange for them to be stolen.

 

He know this was a relatively easy thing to do knowing that Thatcher, Cameron, Sir Kenneth Warren, David Wiltshire, John Major, Ken Clarke, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown any many more would not be able to do anything about it i.e. knowing that all of them were either accessory before or after the fact!

We are looking here at an extremely serious crime being committed by both main parties and that is why the Matrix Churchill Enquiry failed in its infancy and also why the current Chilcott inquiry is so restrictive in its timeline.

 

It was orchestrated in such a way that this incident fell well outside the terms of reference.


We should also add to this, that it appear rather strange that this independent inquiry is operating out of the Cabinet Office and is therefore being controlled and manipulated by Gordon Brown himself!

 

How can the truth ever come out when everything from the pre arranged questions to the answers are known to all taking part... one can already draw your own conclusion as to what the end report will say... something along the lines that all parties acted in the best interest of the country in protecting the UK from terrorism.


When those weapons were switched and stolen why didn’t our government have security in place to secure their dangerous investment? Why didn’t we know they were missing until the 20 foot sea containers arrived in Chicago without the weapons onboard?


Between the event of knowing they had been stolen and up to the current time we now know that the weapons were moved out of Baghdad into Syria via ambulances. Perhaps this is connected to the fact that Israel bombed a Syrian Nuclear Facility in the hope of destroying any such weapon.

 

So this brings us back the question as to who knew what and when. One thing for sure is that Blair, Brown and others lied at the Chilcot inquiry… they knew and still know that the three US nuclear weapons that were stolen and the other three SA/UK Battlefield Bombs were stolen by the same dealer and then sold.


The Conservative and Labour parties still have a dilemma because we now understand that the first attempted nuclear explosion by North Korea was one of the US nukes and that the second explosion on the 25th of May 2009 was one of the stolen British nukes.

 

That leaves us with one big question: where are the other four missing nukes (2XUS and 2XUK)?

 

Indications show that Iran may have received a couple and if this is the case,

No one has every used such a weapon since WW2.

This cat and mouse game reveals that the “Axis of Evil” is right here in the West and forms part of the New World Order with London as its main operating base.

 

No wonder the political elite in this country are clutching at straws in order to protect themselves and come out clean... do we think Blair’s attempt to gain Presidency of the EU is over... most certainly not.


Please understand that all three main parties are totally corrupt either by their own involvement in the above fiasco or by there excessive lean towards Israel. Keep in mind that David Cameron’s trip to South Africa was paid for by Armscor, the people who made the 10 Battlefield Bombs possible!

 

But as I said we cannot put all the blame on Thatcher and her group of irresponsible idiots… Blair and Brown are also right in there… I am sure that one of these two gentlemen would like to recover some extremely sensitive documents that incriminates them… but that’s another story.

Before closing we should just take a quick look at Armscor:

They were the South African Armaments Corp who were operating as a totally illegal company because of UN sanctions against the Apartheid regime.

The White Government of South Africa were worried about the Black takeover and after consultation with the US and the UK Government it was decided to send the remaining 9 weapons back to Chicago for de commissioning (one weapon had already been test fired on a vessel moored off a small island atoll South of South Africa).

It is obvious that Armscor had something for sale and that they did not want the outside world to know about it?

 

The South Africans made the battlefield nuclear bombs at their covert nuclear establishment at Pelindaba, near Pretoria (with the technical help of Israel). It is clear that an agreement was reached between Bush and the UK Government for the UK to take three of the nukes and put them on standby in Oman, for a possible strike against Saddam in Iraq .

If one can relate to Blair’s comments before the war when he said that Iraq had WMD’s ready for deployment in 45 mins!... could it be that he was referring to those weapons being carried in the ambulances that could, realistically, be ready to go at 45 minutes notice... now maybe you can start to put this pathetic jigsaw together.

So there you have it… believe it or not.

 

Would you place a vote for Cameron, Brown or Clegg based on the information provided? Who can you vote for when basically nothing is left? Whatever the outcome and whoever gets in, one thing clearly sticks out here, that both the two main parties were involved in very sinister under the table operations and clearly in bed with the private sector, arms dealers and , investors.

 

In the case of Maggie Thatcher’s it became a family business investment with her son, Sir Mark Thatcher.

 

Don’t you find it obscene that now one can obtain a Lordships or Knighthoods just to keep silent or as a thank you for adding vast sums of money to private and party funds?

 

It is also incredible that a man that disgraced his party on two occasions and who joined as a rep in the EU returned to the UK as a Lord and continues to ravish our industry.

You may choose not to vote for these monster this year or alternatively maybe you will select some insignificant independent to voice your objection to the main parties. Whatever you decide, take care in your selection and stop the New World Order in its tracks

Finally to add further pain to our country, the New World Order’s angel of mercy, the not so Right Honorable Mr. Alistair Darling has indicated that the UK my well have to call on the IMF for assistance...

 

That will truly be a disaster for us but a bonus for the IMF which forms part of the New World Order.

 

Back to Contents