by Peter Eyre
Middle East Consultant
Part - The
Link to the New World Order
Part - The
Satanic New World Order
Part - New
World Order Military Plans
Part - New
World Order Breaches UK Constitution
Part - New
World Order Breaches UK Constitution
Part - New
World Order Breaches UK Constitution - Sedition and Treason
Part - New
World Order Threats, Neglects
Part - Leaders
Put Their Own Countries at Risk
Part - British
Senior Politicians Put UK at Risk
The Link to the New World Order
02 April 2010
This heading may appear alarming to some people
but is there a hidden master plan?
Is it possible that some aspects of this has
already started and if so how and who is involved. We hear so many times of
the so called “New World Order" and the “Illuminati” but does it actually
exist? What ever you want to call this elite organization one can say with
some certainty that it does certainly exist.
I also find it incredible that
this relatively small group can change the course of history and we the
millions may have no power to stop it.
So where does this start and who is involved?
In my opinion mass
depopulation is already well underway with the use of weapons containing
uranium components. It all started back in the Balkans and has progressively
worked its way via Kuwait - Iraq - Afghanistan - Lebanon - Gaza - Pakistan
and soon Yemen and Somalia.
But let’s turn back the clock and see when the aggressive use of “Dirty
Weapons” really started. As I said previously the war in Balkans was the
initial testing grounds for these weapons but something significant had to
happen to allow the New World Order to move forward.
Obviously 9/11 kick
started a series of events that has now become part of the “New World Orders
In my opinion 9/11 was a total conspiracy and a
planned Mossad operation, with of course the full support of certain figures
within the US and elsewhere. I will cover this conspiracy in more details
later on in the series
Doesn’t it appear strange that some of the most powerful people in the world
are members of the Freemasons and yet I feel that there are others much
further up the ladder that pull the strings of these puppets. The ones at
the top of the pyramid are the supper rich elite who control the finances of
the world and thus have control of the world. You may be surprised to learn
who some of these key players are and what this means to the majority of us
who live on this planet. I will cover this aspect in another part.
So this “False Flag Conspiracy” called
9/11 gave these evil satanic minded
people the justification to go to war whilst at the same time allowed them
to spread fear into the hearts and minds of their respective populations.
Perhaps, you the public are not totally convinced that 9/11 was a
conspiracy, hopefully before the end of this series you will be!
Whilst talking about 9/11 as to who did what or how such a huge structure
managed to collapse like a pack of card, let’s just ask the question,
have so many emergency teams became acutely sick and may succumb to cancer?
Besides the controlled explosions that took place, what could cause this ever
increasing list of casualties and why is the US Government moving so fast to
keep this out of court?
Could it be that depleted uranium also became part
of this scenario?
A fund has been raised by the Federal Reserve for between 10,000 - 70,000
workers who will be offered a share in the $657 million payout. The deal
however does come with an ultimatum that no one takes out a lawsuit.
should also ask the question,
how many more people in the New York area have
become victims of 9/11?
So to move on, you may ask the question who would want to depopulate in mass
and how is it possible to do this without we the people knowing it is taking
place? How could this be achieved over a period of time? Has this process
already started and when did it start?
To find the answers we have to go back to the original nuclear tests that
were carried out at Los Alamos. It must be clearly understand that back in
1943 nuclear experts were discussing the advantages of using fine dust as a
One such document was issued on the 30th of October 1943 which
“It is recommended that a decision be obtained from competent
authority authorizing additional work pertaining to the use of radioactive
materials in order that this country may be ready to use such materials or
be ready to defend itself against the use of such materials”.
document contained information as follows:
2. As a gas warfare instrument the material would be ground into particles of
microscopic size to form dust and smoke and distributed by a ground-fired
projectile, land vehicles, or aerial bombs. In this form it would be inhaled
by personnel. The amount necessary to cause death to a person inhaling the
material is extremely small. It has been estimated that one millionth of a
gram accumulating in a person's body would be fatal. There are no known
methods of treatment for such a casualty.
Two factors appear to increase the effectiveness of radioactive dust or
smoke as a weapon.
It cannot be detected by the senses
It can be distributed in a dust or smoke form so finely powdered that it
will permeate a standard gas mask filter in quantities large enough to be
This document gave the background to today’s weapons
that are not only highly effective in there ability to penetration deep into
the target but also the pyrophoric qualities of this product allows it to
ignite spontaneously and create a huge cloud of fine DU dust that becomes a
lethal airborne aerosol.
The documents relating to the above are held by the Palestine Telegraph and
the header of the original memorandum is shown here below to prove its
Although in more modern times we give reference to its usage in
the Balkans the experimental side of using
Depleted Uranium (DU) Weapons
actually stemmed back to the war between Israel and Egypt (Yom Kippur War)
in October 1973.
The US gave Israel new weapons that contained DU and also
sent over their own specialist to train the IDF in the usage of such
weapons. Unknown to the IDF at the time this was the start of what would
become a progressive contamination of the many areas of conflict and the
Coming back to the late 1900’s we can now see the dramatic changes that have
taken place in the Balkans with extremely high level of cancer and other
symptoms that directly relate to the weapons used containing uranium
components. Small villages and towns are running out of burial space as the
toll continues to climb.
Iraq is another classic case of a country that has had it genetics possibly
altered forever and in some locations the women are now being asked not to
have children. But the problem does not remain there. It is on going with
dramatic increases in many forms of cancers, diabetes, mental disorders,
One could see a dramatic decline in the population of Iraq
within a reasonable time frame.
Afghanistan is another major problem area where contamination is manifesting
itself on a much larger scale owing to the excessive usage of uranium based
weapons. They are currently encountering the same birth defects we have seen
in Iraq and it will only be a matter of time before they also are asked not
to have children in certain areas.
The main problem is that the half life of
Depleted Uranium for example is 4.5 billion years and so it is passed down
the line from sibling to sibling.
Now we can turn to Gaza, the latest victim of US and IDF dirty weaponry. The
IDF used a vast array of weapons with heavy usage of weapons that contained
both DU/EU components. This was both before, during and after “Cast Lead.”
Birth defects are increasing in Gaza to almost double that of the previous
year. Gaza’s Health Minister, Dr Bassem Naim, said the study of the
biological samples proved that the Israelis used internationally prohibited
weapons against the Palestinians. He warned that the large percentage of
toxic uranium in the territory would pose a real threat to future
So what do these evil planners have in mind for the residents of planet
Earth? How could this be carried out and who would be the chosen few?
obvious that the first victims in the current stand off would be Israel and
Iran who would form part of the initial stages of their plan. The US
encourages conflict between the two and really would prefer Israel to carry
out the first strike. Israel would then basically become the sacrificial
lamb by launching an attack on Iran (with the assistance of the US).
action would then cause Iran to carry out a reprisal attack, not only on
Israel but also possibly on other US Military/Civilian targets in the Middle
East, such as Bahrain.
Within a very short period of time the US would then counter attack on a
massive scale and very carefully bring
NATO onboard (an attack on one is an
attack on all) setting the Middle East on fire. One would expect the use of
Nuclear Weapons or certainly weapons that have uranium components on a scale
not seen before in the Middle East. This would be a contained Nuclear War
confined to the Middle East only.
However, the radiation fall out from such
an event would be catastrophic to the populations of the entire Middle East,
including Israel itself and the world beyond. One would assume that China
would eventually intervene and back Iran and even possibly Russia which
could turn this regional war into a full scale WW3.
Whatever the final outcome it is clear that the genetics of the entire
Middle East would fall victim to depleted uranium and we could expect to see
a dramatic rise in many forms of cancer, diabetes, infertility, birth
deformities and deaths.
There would remain one big problem for the US and the West and that is the
question of China and Russia and what new alliances would be formed. China
is becoming a formidable super power with a sound economic infrastructure.
In actual fact the investment rate by China is extremely impressive with
major shares in the US and Western Economies. The potential rise of China
into becoming the next super power must send shock waves throughout the US.
As we have already seen during the Chemical and Biological Warfare trials in
Rhodesia and then down in South Africa it is possible for these evil satanic
people (The New World Order) to design a weapon or introduce some form of
Chemical or Biological means of eliminating an entire race.
In South Africa
they designed the “Black on Bomb” which was intended to stop blacks from
With all the current and past technology one could see the
US/West promoting something that would target the DNA of only those of
Chinese descent. Alternatively they may introduce a virus that would have
devastating consequences on such a densely populated country as China.
There is still a distinct lack of trust between the US - Russian and China
and one can understand why when the US continues to establish its missile
defense systems to what it says is to protect itself from any Iranian attack
when it is clearly a defense system against Russia.
It is evident that the
cold war has never finished.
Add to this the struggle by both parties to
secure and dominate vital energy markets and one can see that no change is
on the horizon.
Whatever the plan you can be rest assured (for
those that remain) it will be a world of total subservience to our
One can clearly see a trend that would allow each
country to become a police state with almost every government, local
government and there respective partnerships having the ability to monitor
and control you. Parking inspectors, rangers and more of those cardboard
policemen, Police Community Support Officers (PCSO’s) for instance, would be
given greater power with added extensive
CCTV coverage to keep you in check.
The New World Order would only allow selected people to receive advanced
education leaving the rest to remain uneducated and therefore unable to
fight the system.
Many would remain unemployable and everyone would be
totally dependent on the state for health care and survival.
Order would encourage the splitting up of the family unit, thus breaking
down a sound social system. It would encourage the use of drugs and alcohol
and in allowing this to happen would make us all a population of zombies who
would not dare challenge the system and who would do everything that is
asked of them.
What makes this whole situation frightening is the fact that the US lost at
least three nuclear weapons and the UK lost another three. One would ask the
question how is this possible. The answer is very easy… when you obtain such
weapons under the table you are not in a position to totally secure them or
advertise the fact that you have lost them…they basically do not exist.
I guess you would now ask the question…
”I have heard this story before…how
can it possibly be true”?
The answer is simple:
For every deal there has to
be witnesses and middlemen, there has to be those who put in a tender for
the movement of such weapons, how to move them, people who become signatory
to the deal and someone has to be ultimately responsible for making sure
they are safe to transfer, inspected pre departure and inspected prior to
releasing the final payment upon delivery etc.
As one can imagine no government is going to openly declare that due to
their neglect nuclear weapons went missing.
One could also clearly see that
to this day the US, UK and Israeli Government are still frantically trying
to locate them. Israel alone would be in the forefront of this search
knowing that many countries are now against them.
I guess one would also
assume that if the people in the US knew the truth behind 9/11 they also
could become an enemy to Israel.
In the same way if they knew that the attack on the USS Liberty was an intentional act of
aggression by Israel on a US Military vessel it would certainly cause a rift
in US - Israel relations.
The problem here is that so many turmoil’s and false flags are planned by so
many different agencies and authorities simultaneously. You have the New
World Order who are basically capitalist at the highest level with what some
people say are connected to a much higher group called the Illuminati
The elite are then connected down the line with Freemasons,
Christian Zionist and Jewish Zionist.
Many of these groups have the same
initial goal but with a totally different view point on the final outcome.
Another issue that has come to light is the fact that many of the Jewish
communities living in such places as the US, UK and Australia, who appear to
be good citizens of their host country (by swearing allegiance), are in
actual fact very much attached to Israel in a powerful nationalistic way
i.e. they would rather go and serve their time in the IDF than join the
military of the country where they live.
What appears to be the major cause of many conflicts is the insecurity that
Israel feels with those that live around them.
If at any stage Israel feels
threatened by any country in the region they and their lobby groups
immediately embark on a campaign to take some sort of action or wage war.
The sheer size of their military alone is beyond normal comprehension. One
could certainly see why Israel would want to create a false flag in order to
justify an action.
They currently have operatives in Somalia and Yemen and
one would hate to imagine what they have up their sleeve. Lets not forget
the Israeli air-strikes that were carried out in Sudan last year in direct
breach of sovereignty…but I guess they are a rule unto themselves anyway.
One can also see amongst this complicated array of manipulators an extremely
powerful Pro Israeli Lobby Groups who offer vast sums of money to potential
political candidates or parties in return for the indirect manipulation of a
countries policy that favors Israel. The top of the list must surely be The
American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) in the US.
groups almost have the ability to write bills for Congress. They also have
the power to squash anything that the Israelis could consider as being
against their best interests or that could do damage to their country. On
example of this being
the Goldstone Report which is now in the balance as a
direct result of AIPAC interference and their influence in Congress.
power they wield via the members that they have funded or continue to fund
makes them an extremely powerful and dangerous group. They are also
supported by the US Friends of Israel, EU Friends of Israel, Conservative,
Labour and Liberal Democrats Friends of Israel in the UK.
How can one say
with sincerity that any political party is truly representative of its
One final point before closing Part 1 is the fact that we have a
Nations that basically has no strength whatsoever, despite the number of
nations that created it…it is a tool by which it’s Security Council
decides the fate of any nation. For some time now this Security Council
appears to have another member who does not qualify to sit at the table of
the elite and yet is consulted on all matters… That country is Germany.
We started to see this involvement when Obama, Brown and Sarkosy last met in
the US and handed out some pretty strong words to Iran… I refer to this
group as the G3.5.
Today we see Brown and German Chancellor Angela Merkel's
agreeing on sanctions
against Iran…can one believe the audacity and
arrogance of these people forming alliances and making decisions outside of
the United Nations.
It becomes clear that the New World Order is showing its
fangs and when the time comes it will tell the UN what they had already pre
The Satanic New World Order
07 April 2010
I and many other writers have talked about the
New World Order (NWO) but who are they and just how far will they go to
achieve their goals? The answer to that question is they will go as far as
they need to go to reach their objectives…if that entails killing thousands
of people then so be it.
The NWO are certainly satanic and they will create
any amount of “False Flag” operations to justify a military outcome.
The list is endless...
US Embassy and Hotel in Kenya
failed attack in Somalia
numerous attempted High Jacking’s (including Detroit)
current operations in Yemen
Al Qaeda and the top of the list 9/11 which was a total conspiracy...
could also add to this the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and more recently
man made Swine Flu!
Maybe you are shocked to read this as you would probably be also shocked to
know that our countries are being taken over by these mad men. The term
sovereignty has almost totally disappeared from our dictionary and replaced
by this relatively small group of evil and greedy warmongers who seek to
control the world and its natural resources.
I will leave the 9/11 conspiracy for the final part of this series and just
focus on who are the NWO and what are their ambitions. Before moving on
however we have to fully understand the historical attempt to bring about
the NWO in the 1950’s. Many people today were not aware of this carefully
orchestrated failed attempt that existed during the “Cold War” years.
started off with
NATO and then added CENTO to cover the Middle Eastern
Region and finally SEATO to cover Asia and the Far East To some extent you
will see the resurrection of this same plan creeping back into our lives to
this day and again that will be another article owing to its complexity.
We can see that these plans keep coming and going and it is only the
intelligence of the people who manage to stop it or slow it down. I am sure
that this is the case at the moment and that the NWO want to accelerate
their program but unfortunately they are now probably ten years or so behind
their master plan.
It is their intention to have all the respective
populations living in a type of police state and becoming totally
subservient to their respective governments. They only want a few selected individuals to become educated to a very
high level and the rest to be left by the wayside.
They want us to be totally dependent on the state both in the health and
social sense and one day we may find ourselves walking around with a “Chip
and Pin” planted under our skin as Aaron Russo once said. They do not
believe in the family unit as this creates harmony and therefore they prefer
They encourage the use of drugs and may even one day tax
Basically the NWO want a population of “Zombies” who will do exactly
what they want them to do.
In order to better understand the workings of
this terrible elite group, one should look at the
interview with Aaron Russo before he died of lung
I would never have imagined that one day I would be talking about
conspiracies and the New World Order.
My life was full of the beauty of this
world… nature… wildlife or just simply finding myself on a mountain, deep
within a jungle or forest and listening to nothing but the sounds of nature.
Sometimes we all have a purpose in life and that may come late when we are
least expecting it. For me it was spending time in a remote part of Southern
India, helping poor tribal people, from that moment I started this journey.
What happened to me is beyond words but one thing I can say for sure is that
once you start this journey you cannot stop.
There is not a day goes by without thinking how terrible it was to read a
particle story and say to yourself how evil... but then you read more and more
and the horrors just keep flowing out. One has to fully understand that
there is no limit to the level of evil and killing people in mass is purely
a routine for them. They openly declare the necessity
to depopulate on a
We the public have to remain on guard and fully understand that
the world has lost its direction and imagination and only we the people can
stop the advancement of the NWO.
As I have already discussed in Part 1 of this series they have already
started their mass genocide with a concentrated program in the Middle East.
They have to date directly attacked the genetics of Kuwait, Iraq,
Afghanistan, Lebanon, Gaza with their extensive use of depleted and enriched
uranium weapons and that has now extended on to Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen.
The use of these weapons is totally indiscriminate and therefore the entire
region is being contaminated by these radioactive aerosols.
Most of the
weapons are from the US and are used by all NATO partners as
the Israeli IDF (who are also manufacturing their own). I am amazed
that the entire Arab League just watch this happen and say nothing, even
though they themselves are also at the receiving end and will eventually
succumb to its toxicity. Needless to say the people of Israel are now victim
to their own weapons.
So who are these people who inflict these terrible crimes against humankind?
They are the same group of people that were behind the planned collapse of
the world’s financial markets? They are the same group of people who
intentionally caused the collapse of major banks and businesses so that when
the dust had settled they could walk amongst the carcasses of dead companies
and snap up a good deal. They are the same group that took all the tax
payers money and within a year were operating again with massive profits.
They basically cleared their debt, the governments got their money back but
as usual the poor taxpayers never get theirs back but rather end up paying a
very big IOU for the next 5 - 10 years… sound familiar?
The New World Order includes many of the world's wealthiest people, the
British Crown, top political leaders, and the corporate elite. They aim to
create a fascist type one world government, stripped of nationalistic and
regional boundaries, that is obedient to their agenda. Their intention is to
completely control every human being and at the same time reduce the world’s
population by around 5.5 billion people.
Some say the early days of the NWO
in the US may have started on Jekyll Island, Georgia, when back in 1910 some
of the elite gathered to talk about the formation of the Federal Reserve
Bank So who are the principal organizations, institutions, and individuals
who make up this evil satanic NWO web?
The Illuminati is at the top of the pyramid which is an ancient bloodline of
extremely rich families that make up the core of the “New World Order.”
Their purpose to create
A One World Government and one-unit monetary system,
under permanent control of self elected members from their own numbers in
the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World
entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children
per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful
to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined,
remain as the total world population.
There will be no middle class, only rulers and the servants.
All laws will
be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified
code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One
World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no
national boundaries shall exist.
The system will be on the basis of a
welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World
Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those
who are rebellious will simple be starved to death or be declared outlaws,
thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them.
Privately owned firearms
or weapons of any kind will be prohibited.
Behind this vast web of the wealthy elite is a programmed army who basically
form part of a huge mind control program that has the ability to interact
via the mother to an unborn child... I realize that this may sound totally way
out to many readers but if you take the time to research yourself then you
can draw up your own conclusions.
Some of these mind control programs have a
name such as
Monarch and MK Ultra.
Most governments have a very carefully
scripted propaganda designed to obtain a desired behavioral response from
the public. Public opinion polls are taken on a regular basis with the
intent of finding out the public's acceptance of this Illuminati's planned
program. A strong showing in the polls tells the Illuminati that the program
is working or a poor showing tells the NWO manipulators that they have to do
more work on the program in order to get the desired response.
A “False Flag” operation such as 9/11 or the so called attempted airline
bomb in Detroit is typically a way of not only spreading panic amongst the
population but also a way of taking an action that basically needs a
justification. Any “False Flag” operation or conflict is drawn out onto the
world stage by the controlled media who show use photos and video reports of
horrific and bloody atrocities suffered by innocent civilians.
This has the
desired response when the public cry out that something has to be done.
The governments then step up their next phase into bringing in more
controlled security measures that basically and slowly converts the country
into a police state. Please understand that the word “Terrorism” or “The
Axis of Evil” forms part of their vocabulary but in the real sense does not
One has to understand that the “Axis of Evil” is the NWO.
The 9/11 conspiracy was a typical case of justification that then allowed
the NWO to start implementing its plans to take over the natural resources
of a country whilst at the same time spreading radiation aerosols amongst
its population to attack the very DNA of its residents.
Afghanistan served two purposes it allowed the NWO to take control of the
security of the Opium trade and also to facilitate the TAPI pipeline to run
through the Southern heart of Afghanistan and onwards to the very lucrative
oil/gas markets of Pakistan, India and possibly China.
I was happy to see that despite the extremely strong briefs carried out
by the US in Pakistan and India, not to go for the Iranian pipeline (IPI),
common sense prevailed and now Pakistan and India will take the pipeline
This has enraged the US who desperately needed this market for
their own imperialistic greed. One can clearly see that the war in
Afghanistan is not going completely the way the NWO had wanted and now only
leaves them with
the opium (which is still extremely lucrative) and is the
backbone of the NWO.
We can now see an accelerated program spear headed by the US, UK, France,
Germany and Israel to carry out an attack on Iran at the earliest possible
opportunity. The truth is that in a way they are a little scared as to who
will initiate this attack as it is distinctly possible that Iran already has
a nuke (compliments of the missing nukes that the US and UK lost some years
That terrible mistake involved the US and UK Government’s undermining
the United Nations in hiding the fact that South Africa had made 10 ready to
use Battlefield Bombs (all under the radar).
The assassination of dear Dr.
David Kelly forms part of this story which we can include in another
This terrible mistake cost millions of lives and involved David Cameron,
along with two buddies (whom we will just refer too as KW - Now a Knight - and DW). The trio between them earned the Conservative Party (under Thatcher), a
huge backhander to the tune of 17.8 million pounds, needless to say the
illustrious Mark Thatcher (Maggie’s son) was also involved.
One should also add to this the knowledge and secrets that Tony Blair and
Gordon Brown shared on this topic. Tony Blair also received one million
pounds from a well known Formula One promoter.
We can now start to
understand that the Iraq Inquiry was an absolute farce and allowed both to
walk away with the arrogance one would expect from members of the New World
Sorry, I drifted off the topic a little there so now to get back on track
and see who else forms part of this NWO?
and the big pharmaceutical companies as well as other major multinational
corporations are the backbone of the establishment as are the
of England (House of Windsor) who are high level players in the Illuminati.
Geographically the City of London, Basel Switzerland, and Brussels (NATO
headquarters) are at its heart.
The United Nations, along with all the agencies working under the UN
umbrella, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), are full time players
in this scheme.
NATO is a military tool of the
The leaders of all major industrial countries like the United States,
England, Germany, Italy, Australia, New Zealand (members of the "G7/G8”) are
all part of the bigger picture. The Illuminati are responsible for certain
hand-picked individuals, who are then groomed and selected as Prime
Ministers or Presidents.
To finish off Part 2 we can also add the names of some of those involved in
the NWO who control Wall Street and the City of London:
One can then look at the
Freemasons movement, AIPAC,
Christian Zionist and Jewish
Zionist the list is endless.
We must not forget such evil people as,
...to name a
few who all played their part in the NWO.
Back to Contents
New World Order military plans
08 April 2010
In my previous article I touched base on the historical plans of the New
World Order and how they hoped to encircle the world during the “Cold War”
This article will explain that plan and how in more modern times they
are going down the same road again. The first plan failed but will this
second surge allow them to re establish their authority in trying to create
a one world power.
The North Atlantic Treaty was signed in 1949 but for many years maintained a
very low profile until the outbreak of the Korean War.
It was originally
established to maintain the so called “Iron Curtain” which in principle was
to keep the communist on one side of the fence and the west on the other. It
was also around this time (after WW2) that its other intention was to keep
Germany in check. It was finally decided that Germany would be split with
the establishment of East and West Germany and the Berlin Wall came into
It was interesting to note that in the early years a rift occurred within
NATO itself when France objected to the dominance of the US (sound
familiar?) and wanted a more balanced control. Needless to say the US never
gives away anything and so France started a progressive withdrawal from many
of established areas of NATO and by 1967 had very little activity. An
alliance remained with France with the proviso that should hostilities re
occur France would re enter the organization.
What many people didn’t know was that during the “Cold War” years other
pacts were attempted such as the Central Treaty Organization (CENTO) which
was originally called the Middle East Treaty Organization (METO) or Baghdad
Pact, and the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO).
This was the first
indication (in the global sense) of the attempt or existence of a New World
Order and its intended plans. It became evident to many of the countries involved that this was a US
controlled plan with the UK playing an active part.
CENTO was doomed from
the onset and eventually failed (1958-1979).
SEATO started a little
earlier (1955 - 1977) and also failed.
I myself participated in military
exercises in both organizations and ended up working in NATO, the only
organization that remains to this day.
Let’s now move forward to the current time and see how the New World Order
is trying to re establish itself in much the same way as it did during the
“Cold War” but with much more vigor and manipulation. The main thrust
behind this global dominance is by what I call the G3.5, US, UK, France and
Germany. So what is their current involvement and what are they hoping to
They themselves stipulate their main areas of concern are Iran, Yemen,
Somalia and North Korea. Iran obviously is a thorn in the side for the West,
especially in the eyes of the US, who are desperately trying to secure an
extremely lucrative deal to construct a pipeline from Turkmenistan -
Afghanistan - Pakistan - India (TAPI).
This project is worth trillions of
dollars during it expected life but is not going to plan. It should have
been up and running many years ago but the war has continued to delay its
implementation. The success of this project depended on Pakistan and India
purchasing the gas.
For a very long time the US has been attempting to stop Pakistan and India
from buying into another pipeline which is on offer from Iran - Pakistan -
India (IPI). This pipeline is a much more logical and commercial venture and
will not pass through the existing war zone of Afghanistan.
There is also a
strong interest in this pipeline from the Chinese who may ask for a branch
pipeline to run into China. One can clearly see that the New World Order
want the TAPI pipeline to happen and consequently have this year re enforced
the troops numbers to try and secure Southern Afghanistan for the pipeline
route (Heart - Helmand - Kandahar).
The New World Order is all about taking control of major natural resources
and securing dominance in oil and gas world markets. The war in Afghanistan
was only for this purpose and nothing to do with democracy... obviously the
opium trade was also vital to their plans, as are all drugs.
One major set back has now occurred in that Pakistan and India are expected
to take the IPI Iranian pipeline and not the US/UK option (TAPI).
be a major setback for the New World Order and may now cause a major change
in their military strategy by pulling out of Afghanistan... time will tell.
As we understand the US want Israel to strike Iran in order to justify
bringing the US and NATO into the dog fight.
It is clear that the IDF cannot
carry out this possible attack alone as they do not have an aircraft that
can carry the MOP bomb or do not have the range to make their targets
without the assistance of the US.
Whatever the outcome the New World Order
really do want this to happen in order to weaken the existing regime and at
the same time contaminate the country with Depleted/Enriched Uranium
Weapons. This would also enhance their plans to contaminate the entire
Middle East and thus dramatically attack the genetics of all Islamic
Such weapons currently being used in Afghanistan and Gaza
directly attack the human DNA.
One could then ask the question why is the US, UK and
NATO (New World Order)
interested in Yemen and Somalia... the answer is very simple… they want to
control the Gulf of Aden in order to control the major shipping lanes that
currently passes up the Red Sea and the Suez Canal en route to and from the
Yemen and Somalia sit on either side of this vital supply
route. It would also give the US and or NATO an opportunity to set up a
major military base to guard and control this passage.
So now we can see a rerun of the old master plan (NATO-CENTO-SEATO) with a
significant military presence in the Eastern Mediterranean, Persian Gulf,
Gulf of Aden, the Coastline of Somalia with major international military
bases scattered in and around the entire Middle East. Over in Southeast Asia
we have the same buildup stretching from Singapore - Taiwan - South Korea
with a distinct possibility that the US may get back into the Philippines
(Mindanao) or if not certainly support that region.
If one looks at an updated map of NATO you can clearly see the progressive
advancement in many areas... especially where they may be an Islamic
As far as the New World Order is involved the “Cold War” is still
in existence to stem the flow of communism or to stop Russia from acquiring
more oil/gas dominance on the world market.
We also have the New World Order
that is suffering from Islamaphobia, who keep pushing the Al
Qaeda/Terrorism False Flag issue in order to carry out their own
imperialistic dreams of controlling all major oil/gas reserves or securing
the major world markets.
Currently the vital markets they are after are
Pakistan, India and China but these are fast disappearing!
Back to Contents
New World Order breaches UK Constitution
10 April 2010
I thought I would start this article writing
about many topics such as the well orchestrated financial meltdown, how the
British Government is progressively removing the powers as laid down in its
historical constitution, the manipulation of the EU, the giving away of tons
of gold from our coffers, the false flag
Chilcot Inquiry etc., but then
realized that I would need to do at least 2-3 parts on this subject alone.
With this in mind I will therefore extend this section into Part 5
I then thought about Brown’s previous push to get Tony Blair into the EU
Presidency (despite the fact that he was somewhat tarnished) and how
delighted I was to read the following headline:
Former UK Prime Minister
Tony Blair missed his chance to be the first EU president, with members
selecting the more low-key Belgium Prime Minister Herman Van Rompuy for the
Needless to say although I was happy about this I was also concerned that
such a strange man would take the helm of a sinking ship.
This man must
surely be part of the Illuminati or New World Order. He has connection with
the international banking fraternity and certainly does not come clean with
his past credentials. However, one could also assume that he his acting as a
gate keeper until Blair has brushed the mud of his clothes, after the Chilcott report gives him a clean bill of health!
One would have to ask the question,
Why would our government hand over tons
and tons of gold bullion to the EU at a time when gold was not at a good
price and then add insult to injury by selling it off at below market price?
Wouldn’t the UK tax payers be interested to know as to why this was done?
Was their a connection with that famous New World Order institution,
otherwise known as
Could this be a bribe to fix Blair up with a
permanent job, taking him through to retirement?
Wouldn’t this be to Gordon
Brown’s advantage to have his New World Order partner in crime sitting over
on the other side of the English Channel... pulling the strings?
All of this under the table scheming is extremely upsetting,
especially when the people of the UK are in actual fact supposed to be
running the country with these monsters acting as their representatives.
Wasn’t this country forged out of the Magna Carta and wasn’t our history and
future based on our historic constitution?
I guess I could just forget this issue and the New World Order as most
people out there really do not care or have no interest. However, when our
taxpayer’s money is used so blatantly to fund the international bankers and
then allow the elite to pick amongst the carcasses of so many companies one
must surely want to ask questions?
Surely we do not think for one moment that this financial collapse just
happened? Absolutely no way... the New World Order forced this upon us in a
very well orchestrated manner... They allowed billions of tax payers money to
pay off their bad debt and within one year we find these same rogues reaping
back huge profits.
We saw them pay back money to their respective
Governments and in some cases saw joint ventures evolve. We saw them pick up
lucrative deals from the failed companies that they had ruined, whilst at
the same time putting millions of ordinary people out of work, out of home
My question would be that if the international banker came out on
top and if the government were paid back or became partners then why is it
that the poor taxpayer will still have to pay higher taxes for the next 5 -
10 years? When do we the taxpayer get our money back?... you already
know the answer to that… never!
The fact is that the way the United Kingdom is currently governed is in
total violation of our constitution… not only by the fact that they are
illegally taking away the power of the Monarch and its citizens by falsely
handing this power to a foreign nation. They continue to hand out billions
of taxpayers money and then demand to tax us even more… this is in violation
of our historical constitution.
I thought I would leave the rest of this article to the words spoken by
other good British Citizens who did care and did not sit back in their
armchairs, like most of us and just accept what our government is telling
My first dedication must go to Mrs.
Elizabeth Beckett who worked tirelessly
in defending the constitution of the United Kingdom. I find her work so
interesting especially when she applied her knowledge in advising readers in
the US about the American Constitution.
The following is an extract from the Namaste Magazine Vol 10 Issue 2:
As far as the American Constitution is concerned, Jefferson and co made a
Masonic Constitution, but they did not wipe out the existing British
Constitution on which the colonies had lived for two hundred years. This is
the basis of your law and customs.
The English Constitution includes:
Magna Carta, (which the Supreme Court
used for the release of the people in Guantanamo Bay
The Petition of Right 1627
The Bill of Rights of 1689
The 1700 Act of Settlement
These legal statutes were made by the people
from whom the colonies are descended, only rubber stamped by British
Parliament, (governing the colonies at the time) until independence. It is
the basis of your Law and your Constitution.
The United States Constitution
is subject to the British Constitution.
The only elements of the US Constitution that differ from the British
Constitution is the royal prerogative and Christianity. The prerogative can
exceptionally be used by the President, but is not part of the law as it is
with us in the UK. However, the people of the USA cannot rely on the
'prerogative', all they can do is find the relevant phrases that can fight
These can be found in the Bill of Rights 1689 and chapter 29 of
Magna Carta. Good luck.
I think Elizabeth was a remarkable lady and it is rather sad that this fine
lady no longer graces our planet. She was an extremely strong woman with
values and having a father as a High Court Judges obviously instilled in her
that one must do what is right and not go along with the flow.
Here is more
information on her stance from the same source:
Mrs. Elizabeth Beckett’s legitimate Constitutional stance against an illegal
tax system and treasonous government. A story that should be on the front
page of every newspaper, but has remained unreported!
selfless lady has studied the British Constitution in great depth. Her
initial interest in the law began when she was a District Officer’s wife in
India where her father, a High Court Judge for many years, was party to
drawing up the 1935 India Act of Independence.
Elizabeth was summoned to appear in court at Carlisle, a distance from her
home of approximately 55 miles.
Without hesitation or complaint, this
remarkable 83 year old lady, who in her own words is lame, (she
cannot walk very well without aid, due to a painful hip), took a taxi on her
own, to the court where a judge listened to her appeal against a threatened
bankruptcy order by her local council, for refusing to pay her Council Tax.
Her refusal was based on the following objections:
“It is illegal to pay a
tax to destroy my country.”
Later she discovered just how illegally councils
Elizabeth has received very little mainstream media reporting, the little
she has had has only been at local level. Nationally, the BBC televised 30
seconds on the Politics Show. Even though she was interviewed by a reporter,
the BBC editor refused point blank to broadcast her interview. It was
We ask, could this be because of the influence of Common Purpose?
Namaste has tried to present Elizabeth’s story to various national
They were not interested. In fact the News Desk of the Daily
Mail in Manchester thought our information about Elizabeth’s Constitutional
Rights and the Act of Treason committed against the people of the British
nation was far fetched!
They put it to the News Desk that we do indeed have
a Constitution. This was also dismissed. They ask, could this be because of
the influence of Common Purpose?
I am happy to say that despite the British Medias refusal to covering this
story (as they did with Hollie Greig); we at the Palestine Telegraph are
more than happy to always reveal the truth.
When one continues to read about
such cover-ups it makes the decision to vote that much harder. The three
mainline parties have so much dirty washing to hang out one cannot trust
them to run our country. Their policies are so much aligned to the New World
Order that one must never allow them to succeed.
Again I will use more information from Namaste in order to give them the
media coverage they deserve:
It is quite clear that we are dealing with mindset which is at best totally
ignorant and, at worst, working deliberately to subvert our ancient
Constitutional history - The Birth Right of the People of England, (1700).
This is still the law of the land today!
How could this happen? The plan has
been carefully contrived.
The journalist Stewart Alsop wrote:
power and power is the most valuable commodity in government. So whoever
knows the secrets controls the knowledge and therefore holds the power...”
This would help to explain why Harold Wilson removed the teaching of the
Constitution from the British education curriculum, in the 1960’s and
Today, Britain’s universities DO NOT teach treason laws, the
greatest crime against a nation; hence today, we find our nation and our
freedom in the most critical situation. How could this happen you may ask?
The answer to this can be found in the descriptively accurate words of
Cicero Marcus Tullius, born on 3 January, 106 BC and murdered on 7 December,
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot
survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for
he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst
those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the
alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.
For the traitor
appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he
wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies
deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works
secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he
infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist.
A murderer is less
This is so precisely true of what is taking place today, not only in
Britain, but other countries of the Commonwealth, and the USA - this is the
We and our colleagues both in the UK and USA, are deeply
concerned with the direction that both our nations are heading, yet so many
seem woefully ignorant. This is not because people are stupid but they lack
time and interest to inform themselves, largely because of the education
system and mass media control with mind manipulations.
We see and hear
people acting like sheep, unheeded by the ever emerging totalitarian state,
unquestioning, unwilling to research and blindly accepting lies and
half-truths from those who can only be best described at misinformed and in
the main, deliberate liars.
Part of this disinformation relates to our
Council Tax in the UK. For the
benefit of our overseas readers, Council Tax is a tax on domestic property
collected by local councils in the UK.
The council is supposed to use this
revenue to pay for local services such as schools, rubbish (garbage)
collection, roads and street lighting, etc.
Elizabeth felt driven to research the issue of Council Tax accounts, having
observed various related, suspicious news articles in the press one of which
involved the North West Regional Council of the UK purchasing a house in
Brussels, a totally inappropriate action in view of the sufferings of the
Cumbrian fishermen and farmers.
This alarmed her to the fact that she might
well, as a law abiding honest Council Tax payer, be assisting in the
potential breakup of her country.
We must emphasize that Constitutional Law
is not a matter of politics, whether one votes to drive on the left or the
right, but a matter of law like the dividing of Britain into ‘Lander’ such
as the county of Kent becoming part of France, and Wales becoming part of
That is against our law and Elizabeth said she
could not pay for the destruction of the sovereignty of this country. She
then asked for full disclosure of how her Council Tax is being spent. This
has not been forthcoming because of the liability order against her; the
order is an executive order and in Britain alone is governed by the Royal
The Enforcement Officer and people in charge of the courts
refused to admit that the Liability Order could be challenged in any way.
According to the Petition of Right of 1627 all taxation should be honored
by Parliament, under the Royal Assent and Parliament cannot pass acts that
are against our Constitution.
Elizabeth further discovered a covert plan to do with the regional
assemblies. These are voluntary bodies that are designed to break up
England, e.g. Northumberland up to Carlisle will became part of Germany.
This was not mentioned in the Labour Party manifesto.
Amongst the papers she handed to the judge at her trial, were the details of
Common Purpose and their assemblies, which have increased by 500% since the
year 2000. Taxation emanates from the Chancellor’s Office and these are
illegal under what is known as the ‘fiscal prerogative’ and the ‘Petition of
Right’. Because these assemblies are voluntary bodies, they are not
available for funding by the taxpayer.
Our Constitution states that ‘all
laws’ that go through Parliament ‘must have Royal Assent, in order to become
law.’ Instead, they are now validated on a false claim that the Royal Assent
is automatic. However, the power to grant this is part of the prerogative,
which it impassable.
The automatic assent was invented by the Fabian Prime Minister Asquith who
gave the qualification based on the premise that Queen Ann had been the last
monarch to send back a bill.
The implication being that the monarch could
not send back bills, whereas in fact, their power lies in the support of our
Constitutional Laws by refusing to give Assent to bills that are
The Parliament Act
In fact Edward VII had refused to pass the Parliament Act in 1910 and as
such Asquith had to go to the country for a vote which he lost.
A plan was
devised to get this bill back, so he invited 40 Fabian Socialists and 82 Sien Fien to join his party in order to destroy the House of Lords which had
been holding on to the fiscal prerogative and in so doing he set out to
destroy the British Constitution.
The Parliament Act is actually illegal under the Constitution and the 1848
Treason and Felony Act, which states that neither House, Lords nor the
Commons has power above the other. The 1911 Act altered the ‘fiscal power,’
which according to our Constitution cares for all taxpayers, as stated under
the Petition of Right (part of the Constitution - No taxation without
This puts taxation illegally into the hands of the majority
political party in the Commons, and without any amendment allowed from the
House of Lords.
At the time of the French Revolution and the American Independence,
political parties weren’t fixed as in the Masonic Constitution of America,
which is based on the principal of divide and rule. Whereas in Britain, the
British Constitution was made by the People for the People and the monarch
holds them together according to our Constitutional laws.
In relation to
this fact, Elizabeth put forward to the judge the question of Brussels
acting illegally under European Laws which invalidated the court itself.
e.g. the 1988 Mercantile Shipping Act in relation to Spaniards fishing
within the British 12 mile limit.
Brussels overruled it and fined the
British £300,000. In doing this Brussels claimed rights over our Sovereign
and Parliament who had passed the Act. She pointed out to the court under
this ruling it had no validity.
At which point the judge shut her up and
“I am under contract to make a liability order against you since the
order allowed no exception.”
This is entirely against our constitutional laws. Elizabeth then asked for
leave to appeal.
The judge replied,
“You can do what you like.”
Elizabeth explained to the judge that Queens Council has given her his
“Technically under the Rules of Erskine May, it is stated the
Automatic Assent, if not complied with, would invalidate ALL laws since
Elizabeth’s Plaint lays the ground for important legal and Constitutional
constraints which are being side-stepped and their legal validity is being
denied by our present legal system and government.
The fact they are still
part of our British Common law is undeniable, Sir Edward Coke said,
Royal Prerogative is part of the Personality of the Monarch and could not be
taken from them even by an Act if Parliament” which the Law Lords Halbury
and Jowitt agree.
Halbury’s Laws, The Birth Right of the People of England
- These are legal reference books of great prestige.
Since the Assent is given under the regal ‘Prerogative Power,’ it is invalid
if it is given to an unconstitutional act.
So in a different way, both
Counsel’s opinion and Elizabeth’s lead to the same conclusion. Therefore,
she says that one can conclude that ALL of the bills that have been made law
since 1911, which includes 1972 entry into Europe, and all that follows,
together with the Civil Contingencies Bill, the constitutional Reform Act,
Equality Act and the Immigration Act ARE VOID.
It is clear that our entry into the European Union is INVALID, ILLEGAL and
against our Constitution. Treason has been committed and should be remedied.
Namaste once asked Elizabeth why she was making this potentially dangerous
and difficult stance at her time of life.
“I do it for my children, grandchildren and for all our ancestors - all
those who have died for our freedom. Do you want to see your children in
chains? I was in India during the war and knew about the fight against the
Japanese and I knew about the earlier war and I quote John Edmonds... ‘When
You Go Home, Tell Them Of Us And Say, For Their Tomorrow, We Gave Our
John Maxwell Edmonds (1875 -1958).
She went on to say:
the Constitution. Research it. Know it. Know that it exists and help to keep
it alive against the evil forces dedicated to its destruction.”
Elizabeth also suggested the following:
Readers should consider raising the
following points as set out below, with their local council. Bear in mind
that it is probable that Common Purpose is operating in your area. Councils
cannot take taxes for an organization that cannot achieve an audit. It is
illegal under the Local Government Act 1972, which is still used for
auditing local government accounts.
All those who pay Council Tax should write to
their local council and quote section 239 of the 1972 ACT.
You as the Council have the right to
oppose or depose acts in Parliament.
Under your oaths of allegiance, the laws in the Bill of Rights
of 1689 make clear this country CANNOT be ruled by ANY foreign
power: “No foreign Prince, person, Prelate, State, or Potentate,
hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction, Power, Superiority, Pre
eminence, or Authority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this
They also added two codicils at the end of the Bill of Rights
“Any amendments to the bill after the 23 October 1689 shall be
void and not lawful, and this bill is for all time”.
This law and its oath are not
subject to Parliament because they were given to Parliament by
the People whose WILL is supreme over Parliament.
This means Parliament may not allow any part of the
aforementioned oath to be breached side-stepped or ignored. This
Bill of Rights precludes and effectively forbids Parliament from
passing any bill like the 1972 EEC Act, the Treaty of Rome or
any other European legislation which gives them any say at all
in the governance of England. It also precludes Parliament from
passing any laws contrary to the spirit of this Bill of Rights.
Chief Justice Beresford said;
The Scots have their own version of this law. Indeed the people
and Parliament were told the 1972 EEC Act was a purely trading
agreement with no Constitutional impact at all!
Since you use the Local Government
Act for your audit, I wish to draw your attention to another
services’ misdemeanour and that is you have been paying my
council tax in to an unaudited administration (this is the 13th
If I were to pay my Council Tax I
would be complicit in this illegality. Even more seriously, I
would be allowing without complaint, the present Government’s
intention to herd this country over to this illegal
Under the powers given to you under
section 239 you have the power to refuse to agree this and would
be acting illegally if you did not.
This applies to any council, PRESS
them to ACT under these laws.
Do you want to be like the judge acting illegally under European
law? Or do you want to do something about it? We must never
forget, our Constitution was made by our ancestors (often with
their lives) not by Parliament.
The 'prerogative power' is given to the monarch
by the PEOPLE, under the
Bill of Rights of 1689 and
monarch agrees to protect our laws and customs under the Coronation Oath and
the Constitution. Failure do so is TREASON against the people! We are
protected from GESTAPO type (executive) law by the 'prerogative'. This is
what the New World order is trying to take away from us. This is our ancient
law. Therefore, why has the monarch signed FIVE illegal treaties taking us
into a criminalized organization - the EU which is completely against our
Elizabeth did apply for an interlocutory injunction to stop Brown and his
associates taking us, the People of the UK further into an illegal
administrative situation. (Anyone can and should do this).
It is illegal for
a government to be financially involved with an organization that cannot
even audit its own accounts. The EU has not audited its accounts for the
past 13 years.
OPEN LETTER TO PRIME MINISTER BROWN
Dear Mr. Brown
It appears that you are acting under the Constitutional Reform Act of 2005,
imagining that you, as a Prime Minister, hold the 'prerogative power.'
Are you sir, aware of the meaning of the 'PREROGATIVE POWER'?
Have you taken constitutional legal advice on this very serious action of
entry into the EU?
If so from whom have you sought such advice? Are you aware that this is a serious crime against the People of Britain? It
Mrs. Elizabeth Beckett
THE ABOVE QUESTIONS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO ASK
MR. BROWN BECAUSE - UPON
TAKING OFFICE HE MADE A OATH OF ALLEGIANCE WHICH INCORPORATES OUR
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND FAILURE TO ABIDE BY THE SAID OATH OF ALLEGIANCE IS
We ask readers to please to copy the above letter and replace Elizabeth's
name with their own name and send to number 10 Downing Street and see what
response they get.
All letters received from number 10 Downing Street to the
above letter, if any, will published in the Palestine Telegraph. I guess we
should not hold our breath waiting because as the end of the day they not
longer serve the public that puts them in office.
We should all take a chapter out of the life of dear Mrs. Beckett and
reclaim our country from the talons of the New World Order.
I have included
timeline as published in the
Namaste Magazine covering the
latter part of Elizabeth’s life leading up to her death:
24th December 2007
There is a delay in the appeal for judicial review because the court in
now informed Elizabeth that since a certificate of service has not been
received by the court the case can't move forward. The fact is the
certificate of service was faxed to the court on 1st December by a
government employee on Elizabeth's behalf. She also has a letter from the
local council dated 8th December, confirming receipt of the certificate of
service and she has sent copies of the said letters to the court. Thus
Elizabeth has asked the court for an upgrading of her case which has been
delayed because they claimed they had not received the certificate of
A notice is about to be served on Elizabeth for a court hearing in
February 2008 to implement the bankruptcy order made against her in March
2007. The hearing will take place in Carlisle.
Interestingly, the interlocutory injunction filed by Elizabeth to stop
Brown and his associates taking us, the People of the UK further into an
illegal administrative situation, seems to be delayed lost in the system.
The hearing for the implementation for the liability order against Elizabeth
will take place on the 6th February 2008 at Carlisle Court, Rickergate at
This was to validate the extent of her liability because her income
is so low which has now been dealt with.
27th February 2008
Thanks to the generous donations received by members of the public, we
were able to pay into court the £1,293.97 required to prevent the bankruptcy
order against Elizabeth's being executed. Her home has been saved for now.
Nevertheless, Elizabeth still intends pursue her case against the illegal
27 May, 2008
21 June, 2008
Today, Elizabeth has been advised by the Penrith Magistrates that they
have passed a Liability Order against her, for refusal to pay her Council
tax. She has taken this stance in order that she can take her case foreword
and therefore continues to pursue her application for judicial review
against the illegality Liability Order in the Council Tax Act of 1992.
Penrith Council have informed her she can appeal her case which she fully
intends to do.
Further updates on Elizabeth's situation will be posted as and when we
have more information. Please note, that what Elizabeth is doing, for all of
us, not just for herself, and therefore she needs all our support!
7 February, 2009
To close Part 4 of this series I will print a copy of her last letter to the
Queen before passing away. This will not be the last we hear of Elizabeth
Beckett as I intend to print another classical letter she wrote.
lady will never be forgotten and as we will see many others are taking up
the fight... in the meantime read and enjoy:
Her Majesty The Queen
London SW1A 1AA
21 January 2009
Giving careful consideration to the mode of address in this letter, although
in courtesy I have addressed it in conventional manner, it is clear that
having, in effect, abdicated by failure to perform your coronation oath you
leave the people of this nation without effective titular head to whom we
may address our petitions.
I write to you only in your pre-eminence in
Common Law. I write on Edmund Burke's remark that for evil to flourish it is sufficient
for good men to do nothing.
At your coronation you swore on oath to rule this country according to our
laws and customs. This contract with us was written clearly in Magna Carta
and replicated by Edward I in 1274. After saying that he would give no such
oath, the archbishops, bishops, barons and freemen said that, in this case,
they would get another king.
In Magna Carta it was made clear that if the monarch went against this oath
then chapter 61 would apply, the contract would be broken and the monarch
would have to give up his position and possessions. You have, throughout
your reign, disregarded our laws and customs in the legislation that has
gone through Parliament.
I believe that you have done this on the basis of the Fabian inspired
Parliament Act of 1911 which argued untruthfully that since royal assent had
never been denied by a monarch since 1707 (when Queen Anne sent back a Bill)
the use of the royal assent had fallen into abeyance.
This claim was untrue
and treasonable. Only the year before, Asquith had been forced to go to the
country by Edward VII who sent back the same Bill to Parliament. And indeed
monarchs had refused assent on at least six other occasions since 1707. On
each occasion this refusal of assent was because the Bills concerned
breached our constitution.
In other words, the 1911 claim, is incorrect and the monarch's assent was
never and can never be deemed unnecessary or automatic, even though George V
chose to accept that the royal assent was now a formality and that the
monarch could not, in reality refuse assent - as in the Northern Ireland
Despite all the long years of your reign this method of agreement, either
forced on you, or under "automatic assent" nevertheless cannot be upheld as
Many people who have written to you on constitutional matters have received
replies from your secretary (most recently, Sonia Bonici) saying that their
letter had been forwarded to the government department misleadingly called
the Department of Constitutional Affairs and Ministry of Justice. Your
compliance with this has permitted the judiciary under these government
departments to claim, as in the Chagos Archipelago appeal, that our
fundamental liberties do not exist and that the peoples of these islands
have no rights under our law.
I am old and now seriously ill. I cannot die without making clear to you
that you have broken your oath to us your people.
The 1911 act purports to permit taxes to be levied on us merely by a
majority in the House of Commons and without reference to the upper chamber.
This again is against our constitution and specifically not permitted by our
Petition of Right of 1627. The most serious instance of this is the use of
our taxes to fund the banking system of this country: this is being
explained to the electorate as a step which will in some way make us rich,
whilst in fact it is not only unlawful, but a most serious abrogation of our
rights and your duties under our constitution.
Your contract with the people of this country and the colonies and dominions
cannot be destroyed by the chicanery of the Fabians in the 1911 Act, nor by
If you have the courage to fulfill your contract,
however belatedly, you could prorogue Parliament now and have a free
election with or without party divisions so that this country can go forward
in a proper and united way to remove us from the difficulties that have
ensued since the 1911 Parliament Act.
The Archbishop of Canterbury
I am sure readers would agree that this person represents what we all
feel but never have the courage to act upon.
I would like to congratulate
the Namaste Web Page for their gallant effort in trying to bring this to the
world’s attention. It is rather sad that once again we see the British Media
neglecting the British Public in bringing this out into the open. It goes
without saying that Elizabeth Beckett never gave up in her fight for justice
and to retain the traditions of the United Kingdom.
I therefore dedicate
this article in her name...
Back to Contents
New World Order breaches UK Constitution
13 April 2010
In my previous article (Part 4) I discussed the
illustrious efforts of Mrs. Elizabeth Beckett in addressing the breaches by
the UK Government of our ancient constitution.
Elizabeth sadly passed away
on the 7th February 2009 and this classic letter is an example of her
ability to shake the very foundation of UK politics.
The following dedication was made by
Martin Cole on his Blog.
As an example of her long fight for the restoration of the Sovereignty of
the British people and this nation's restored independence AND in
recognition of the sturdy fight she waged for her fellow countrymen and
women, I reproduce below a letter she sent to Sir Anthony Clarke, Master of
the Rolls dated 10th October last year which confronts recent constitutional
outrages not least in the matter of the banks!
Please circulate this as
widely as possible in tribute to this fantastic Lady.
Sir Anthony Clarke
Master of the Rolls
From Elizabeth Hibbert Beckett
10 October 2008
Dear Sir Anthony - your Lordship
I write to you in your position as Master of the Rolls and in view of your
article on Magna Carta in The Times.
Churchill, writing on Magna Carta, said, that there will come a time when
government, inflated with power, will try to overrule it, but it will come
into use again.
I write with deep and serious concern about the present actions by
government on using taxpayers money for their debts, apparently due to their
encouragement of hysteria since there is "plenty of money around" (said by
speakers on Today and Newsnight).
The safeguards that need immediate action are:
that the debt should be made under the Nordic system
that it should be safeguarded as belonging legally to the Taxpayers NOT
The Queen should be asked to prorogue parliament immediately as a
temporary arrangement until there has been an election.
A national government of convention should hold the fort. (The Queen was
unfortunately taught about the constitution by Sir Henry Martin who became a
Fabian in 1921. She has apparently not grasped the significance of her
position and her Coronation Oath and imagines that she is subordinate to her
I consider that as Master of the Rolls in this terrible time it must be
for you to try to disabuse her of this and hold chapter 61 of Magna Carta to
her notice. (Various people have suggested Princess Anne as Queen in her
place since Prince Charles has not grasped the Christian importance of our
constitution in Magna Carta and throughout our history - our early Christianity, starting from c. AD 50, has been central to wars from without
and within against 'this dear land'; Magna Carta as a defence against
William of Normandy's laws. Llanfranc was the imposed archbishop of
Canterbury and the invasion was inspired by Papal direction.
I write to you since Lord Faulkner acted unconstitutionally in putting
before Parliament that the Royal Prerogative belonged to himself and the
Prime Minister in the Constitution Reform Act of 2005. You will know Sir
Edward Coke's clear description that the prerogative could not be taken from
the monarch - even by act of Parliament, agreed by Halsbury.
Your position as effectively deputy Lord Chancellor gives you authority
to support us, the people of England and Scotland.
On the other hand,
government has shown a lack of constitutional restraint and even lack of
knowledge of the laws of this country both in the Constitution Reform Act
and further acts that have forced me and others to ask you to use the
strength of your position acting as the executive guardian the people of
this country and contracted to the monarchy by law.
As the substitute Lord
Chancellor, when the other appointee betrayed his position a by treasonous
claim initially defined by the 1351 Treason Act.
I have take two steps in the defense of our position
I have laid Information with the court lawyer at Newcastle, Mr. Brown,
that by making the Queen sign the Lisbon Constitution, Mr. Gordon Brown,
acted treasonably against various Acts, his own Oath of Allegiance, and his
Privy Councillor Oath. (This perjury should legally remove him from
With the help of a friend, a retired policeman, I e-mailed the Speaker of
the House of Commons that by passing as law the Bradford & Bingley takeover,
being called 'nationalization' by Statutory Instrument without mention of
the name of the monarch Mr. Brown and Mr. Darling acted unlawfully and
should not be allowed to take up their seats in the Commons. I quoted the
basis of this illegality as the 1661 Praemunire in which the punishment of a
Praemunire is outlawry, the loss of property and land and possibly death.
Harold Wilson repealed Praemunire which goes back to 1392. But since when he
did this it would have been in defiance of the 1795 Treasonable and
seditious practices act para 2, 36 Geo III c.7, his oath of allegiance and
his Privy Council oath, it was not lawful. And this valuable act of George
III was made permanent in 1807, 1817 and 1848, so was given strength and
longevity even against Mr. Blair's endeavor to repeal it in the Criminal
Justice Act 1998.
On The Borrowing
I doubt whether the government has the power to borrow to this extent for
a national government. The 1911 Parliament Act which gives the majority
power in the Commons without the Lord's right to amend had already been sent
back as unconstitutional by Edward VII. It was accepted by George V under
the impression that automatic assent of Asquith (another Fabian) was correct
like the Statutory Instruments the present Government laid on the table at
the time of Northern Rock.
It was made on the false basis that no Bill has
been sent back by a monarch since Queen Anne in 1707.
There is no trace
of discussion in Hansard or anywhere else
Bills had been sent back by
William III, George III, William IV, Victoria and Edward VII, as Asquith
well knew. Such a claim of automatic assent paralyzed our constitutional
laws and is probably the basis of the Queen's behaviour.
If the people are to be helped at this time, three means of taxation
should be changed.
Mortgage relief should be reinstated.
VAT which leans very heavily on small businesses - or at least Mrs.
Thatcher's VAT rebate. It is merciless, politically motivated and costs the
nation £20 Billion annually with no benefit to this people.
Tax on fuel should be reduced since its effect is arbitrary by any
So Mr. Blair altered legal aid so much that even people on my income
(less than £9,000 pa) cannot get it and treason needs a very narrow
certificate from the lawyers. I therefore ask you to take the steps
necessary under 2a) above if it is by any means within your power.
I am taking a case on the illegality of some aspects of council tax in
the high court: I was granted oral review, but thought it wiser to have
counsel rather than act on my own and Leolyn Price CB QC has kindly agreed
to represent me.
The lowering of trust apparently intentionally has led to loss to
shareholders for whom legal protection is needed. The people in Parliament
seem to have little knowledge of the law nor the legal protection of the
people, only the desire for power and in this case globalisation. William
Blackstone said, "Law is not a matter of opinion." This, our representatives
seem not to have learnt.
The House of Lords is the Curia Regis to advise the Monarch. The
suggestion that a man who has twice been asked to leave the government for
malfeasance should be given a position in the Lords tends to further
distrust of government at a time when trust is essential if the nation is to
come together and rise above the present discomfort and lack of trust in
this government and the Curia Regis.
It gives an impression of
irresponsibility in government which is outside our principles and
traditions. But apparently fits in with the teaching of five-year-olds that
they are part of a wider community without being based in their own. Mr. Blunkett, Mr. Brown and others have published books paid for by the
tax-payer effectively dispersing any concept of our Christian heritage.
Brown, as an example, in his white paper has said he intends to give the
Royal Prerogative to Parliament or even to the people in one sweep of the
pen without recognizing the meaning of the prerogative removing our history
and our constitution for which our ancestors fought.
I now put before your Lordship the grounds of high treason against those
presently governing this nation.
Firstly so that the so-called removal of the prerogative power from the
Queen comes directly under the 1351 Treason Act since the Act of
Constitutional Reform by taking the prerogative from the monarch, the power
being in Sir Edward Coke’s words a part of the monarch and cannot be taken
from the monarch even by act of parliament and removal, therefore, comes
directly within the phrase "if a man compasses or imagines the death of the
sovereign..." it is treason: "if a man levies war against the sovereign…" and by taking over the position of the Lord Chancellor and turning it
into something else this comes into "slaying the Lord Chancellor…".
head of constitutional affairs and the justices by false laws that treason
is further laid and supported in later treason Acts and backed by the 1351
Treason act in the words, "…and because that many other cases of the like
treason may happen in time to come which a man cannot think or declare at
this present time; it is accorded, that if any other case of supposed
treason which is not above specified…" is to go before the justices and the
king to be judged treason or felony
Under this heading I name the imposition of automatic into "the Royal
Assent". for this has been claimed "as to the status of convention that the
Royal Assent is not withheld from Bills which have been passed by both
houses of parliament the Prime Minister is in doubt …" (quoted from 1972
letter from 10 Downing street)
This conflicts with the statement in Rogers
Walters, "How Parliament Works", Pearson and Longman fourth edition which is
in use in the speaker’s office and in most county libraries where the Royal
Assent is clearly defined:
Rogers and Walters add the concept of the assent being ‘automatic’ and it is
relevant to the treason that the phrase was inserted in 1911 for King George
V to be persuaded to pass the Parliament Act and other legislation against
Under the framework of the Treason and Felony Act of 1848,
‘any person who compasses or imagines devises or intends to depose… in
order to force constrain or compel her or they to change their measures or
courses… shall be guilty of felony", conviction being transportation for
not less than seven years with hard labour.
In the book on the constitution by Nigel Knight, tutor in Law at Cambridge
University, a further aberration and compelling of the mind of the monarch
on the Home Rule Bill for Ireland was given against the wishes of George V.
That this chicanery has continued to be used does not make it less heinous
and it is relevant that the claim of 1972 from Downing Street connived with
the entry into the EC and hence the EU.
I write now, in view of the danger, after the attempt of Michael Foot to
nationalize banks, now being effected under the same intention, but with the
camouflage of a world economic crisis, to ask your Lordship to declare the
automatic assent void and illegal under the constitutional statute including
that of 1795 made perpetual in 1807, 1817 and 1848 and only repealed under
the automatic assent, Rogers and Walters claim the assent by convention had
become automatic since Queen Anne was the last monarch to send a Bill back.
In fact, William III, George III, William IV, Queen Victoria and, as Asquith
well knew, Edward VII (because the Bill had been handed to him), had all
Most of the ordinary people of England such as myself and my friends,
know the principles of our constitutional laws for which the freemen and
barons of England fought and forced on John with the help of the bishops and
arch-bishops at Runnymede.
The cruelty, despite constitutional constraint, which successive governments
have forced on us involves a mercilessness that has to be held as treason
against the sovereign people and augurs badly for such people having the
power over our money. I fought for ‘the man on the shop floor’ when I gave
Lord Hailsham the concept of the conscience clause against the Foot Bill
(Trades Unions and Labour Relations Amendment Bill).
Lord Hailsham was
unable to get that clause through and it had to wait until Mrs. Thatcher and
yet this is central to our spiritual existence as a Christian nation. These
politicians could see no relevance in the freedom of the spirit of man.
We, the ordinary people of Britain, the freemen, ask for you to take the
steps needed to free our constitutional laws and customs giving us
protection against the hideous and treasonous servitude under which we are
presently held and free our sovereign from the Fabian thrall or, failing
that, under chapter 61 of Magna Carta, replace her with someone able to
honor their Coronation Oath.
The present situation is worse than that under
As we can see this lady certainly knew her stuff and will be sadly
”Dear Mrs Beckett may your soul rest in peace and I sincerely hope
that your courage and determination lives on in the hearts and minds of
those that care for their country.”
We can now turn to those that remain and continue to challenge the system.
One such person that comes to mind is John Harris who on the 22nd of March
2008 traveled to London to serve an Affidavit on the Queen at Buckingham
As one would expect at the gates to the palace his journey to proceed was
stopped by a very courteous policeman and thus was unable to deliver the
Affidavit in person. John refused to give up on his mission and so he
decided he would take took the next option and send it recorded delivery to
the Queen before he left London. John has a long line of credits to his name
and is persistent to say the least.
You can see his effort to deliver the
Affidavit on this link:
Another person who stands up for what is right is Brian Gerrish a true
British stalwart who never gives up and has given so much of his time in
fighting the fight for true justice.
We should take our hats off to these
two brave men who are prepared to take on the establishment. Brian like John
also has a long list of credits and both can be research and viewed on the
internet and You Tube.
Brian’s follow up on John’s attempt to serve the
Affidavit can be viewed on the following link:
There are many other proud Brits who do not want to see this country become
part of the European Union and thus loose its identity... can one ever imagine
not being able to say you are British, or English etc when you are asked the
question... it is perfectly possible that your answer may well be simply
I cannot list all of those that continue this daily fight with the
authorities but it would not be fair for me not to mention Albert Burgess
(an ex policeman) who feels very bitter towards the way this country is
being steered. You can view him on and
see for yourself.
What was interesting in the Affidavit document was a very powerful sentence
This oath, states quite clearly, that “I now give Her Majesty 40
days to dismiss the traitors that reside in the Parliament of this country.”
Because of the seriousness of the New World Order’s attack on our
constitution I have decided to extend this aspect of the current series.
is so serious that there is a distinct possibility that our constitution
could soon become null and void. I therefore ask the question, are we, the
residents of this great country, going to allow key political figures to
destroy our history and legal system?
Are we going to allow our Queen to
fail in her duties?
Are we going to allow the United Kingdom to be handed
over, by our corrupt politicians, and controlled by foreign powers?
clearly an act of treason as the highest level.”
Before closing this particular topic I would now like to introduce you to
someone else who like many of us are fearless of authority.
His name is Mark
Welsh a very proud Brit who resides in Scotland and does not accept the lies
and deceit that are handed out by the political elite in the Scottish
Parliament and also in Westminster.
Although rather long I would fully recommended those that are concerned
about the welfare of their country to read this in its entirety and also
Part 6 for his final brief on the New World Order and the governments attack
on the constitution up to the current time.
in this pdf file...
New World Order breaches UK Constitution
Sedition and Treason
13 April 2010
In my last article (Part 5 above) I started the story relating to
and Treason that the UK Government has been progressively carrying out since
the days of Prime Minister Edward Heath back in 1971.
All governments since
that time have been chipping away at the UK constitution right up to the
Anyone implicated in this activity are guilty of a very serious
crime, namely the crime of Sedition under common law and the crime of
treason under common law.
Because of the seriousness of these crimes it is important that a full
account be given of the brave attempts by concerns members of the public to
halt this, under the counter manipulation, of the UK Constitution. If the
citizens of the United Kingdom do nothing then within a very short timeframe
the country as we know it will be gone forever.
This is the continuation of Part 5:
A LAYMAN’S VIEW OF THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION
by Mark Welsh
First of all, I do not profess to have any background in the study
of law and certainly not Constitutional law. It is also extremely difficult
to find any Law firm which does practice Constitutional law. I suggest there
is good reason for this.
Furthermore, I read an article, recently, which
suggested that the UK government were suggesting that the teaching of
British history within our schools would not go further back than 1700 - An
interesting point in time, if this is so, since it means that the Glorious
Revolution of 1688 and the introduction of the Bank of England in 1694 would
never be taught - not that, as I understand it, the latter issue has ever
been taught in our schools except, perhaps, to state the year in which it
What happens when a society grows up unaware of its past and the significant
events which transpired to create today’s society and culture within the UK?
It ends up providing a clean slate upon which, the government establishment
can rewrite history and recreate and form the society it so pleases. A
perfect environment to shape entirely new policy and legislation to allow
the imposition of a totally new form of government - a form of government
which is based upon laws being created by Banking and Corporation interests.
A form of government, therefore, which is purely focused on revenue and
profit being squeezed out of every single individual. A form of government
which does not recognize free men and women but demands that every citizen
creates value, otherwise they are dispensed with.
This is not at all
difficult to achieve. It already exists to a great extent through propaganda
- the stigma attached to the unemployed while the state does not provide an
environment which allows for full employment. When a country destroys and/or
sells off its industry, what does one expect? However, I digress.
There was a letter sent to our government by a “Loyal British Voter” some
time ago which I picked up on and re - present here:
EU Directive Consultation Response,
Government Equalities Office,
9th Floor, Eland House,
HRH Queen Elizabeth, at her coronation in 1953,swore on oath before Almighty
God to govern the British people according to Gods Law and customs per the
Bible. Likewise, it is incumbent on all politicians including the prime
minister to obey those laws in support of the Oath sworn by our Queen.
Further, in accordance with the Declaration of Rights 1688,they are required
to resist the encroachment of a foreign power (e.g the European Union), and
all Directives emanating from the EU are in contradiction of those laws and
have no jurisdiction in this realm of the British Isles.
The Declaration of Rights of 1688 is a settlement treaty and NOT an Act of
Parliament and therefore cannot be repealed by Parliament.
Therefore it is imperative that the present Prime Minister and Parliament
repeal the European Communities Act of 1972,from which the EU derives all
its authority, and stop trying to enforce those Directives on the British
people, or else the Parliament should be dissolved and the British people
given the chance to re-elect a Government which will truly represent them,
without any European influence.
So the aforementioned EU Directive consultation is therefore null and void
and a waste of public money, therefore any person or Parliamentary candidate
is guilty of TREASON in trying to implement it.
I also advise you, that you personally who are involved in this
consultation, are considered to be a party to an act of treason and traitors
to your countrymen, and therefore should also be tried for participating in
an act of Treason.
THE CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION RE SOVEREIGNTY
To consider this treason issue further, it is necessary to look deeply into
the term “Sovereignty” and how the Constitution is framed to protect such
What is Sovereignty and where does it lie in the UK?
What is Sovereignty?
" Sovereignty is the legitimate and exclusive right to exercise power within
a given area"
In other words - Sovereignty is Supreme Power.
Different types of sovereignty exist:
Legal Sovereignty: where Supreme Power lies according to the law
Political Sovereignty: where Supreme Power lies in reality
Pooled Sovereignty (In the EU, a supranational organization, decisions are
made by European Institutions on which all members are represented, but none
has a overall say)
Most democratic political systems have both the separation of powers and
checks and balances to prevent a single institution becoming omnipotent
although, in practice, when the Executive Branch of government - the Cabinet
- can plant who they wish within the judiciary, then that separation is
Parliamentary Sovereignty is regarded as the main principle of the British
Constitution. In other words, Parliament holds the supreme authority in the
In what ways is Parliament sovereign?
Parliament has the ultimate political authority. Most key decisions (but
not all, as some military and foreign decisions are in the hands of the PM)
must be approved by Parliament.
All powers exercised by ministers (except for the prerogative powers of
the PM), devolved governments, local governments and other public bodies are
granted by parliament and can be removed by Parliament.
All new primary legislation must be passed by parliament and secondary
legislation made by ministers can be overruled by Parliament.
Parliament is not bound by its predecessors (i.e. past Parliaments cannot
control the actions of the current Parliament).
Parliament cannot bind its successors (i.e. it cannot pass laws that
cannot be repealed or amended by future Parliaments).
So, is Parliament really Sovereign?
Parliamentary sovereignty has been undermined in a number of areas:
- Political Parties:
Since the reductions in the power of the House of Lords in 1911 and 1949,
the balance of power has shifted to the House of Commons. Combined with the
dominance of political parties in elections since the start of the C20, this
has led to tight party control over MP's and disciplined parliamentary
groups that make the business of the House of Commons very predictable.
Practical reality dictates that the British Government is the majority party
in the House of Commons. Strong party discipline makes this majority
reliable and almost guarantees the Government victory in Commons votes - an
'Elective Dictatorship'. Also backed by the Civil Service 'machine' it is
easy to argue that sovereignty actually lies with the executive not
Parliament. However, Prime Ministers who systematically repress the powers
of party and parliament tend to meet their fate - Margaret Thatcher is a
classic example of this. However this hasn't happened yet, with Brown, and
doesn't look to be on the cards for some strange reason (But I won't get
into that for the moment).
At least once every five years the House of Commons is re-elected, and so at
that point sovereignty really lies with the people. However, after the
general election sovereignty returns to Parliament for the next five years.
That sovereignty of parliament however, exists within the legal/lawful
framework of our Constitution.
- European Union:
When Britain signed the Treaty of Rome in 1973 (an Act of treason by Edward
Heath supported by the FCO and BBC amongst others) it accepted that the
status of European law is superior to British law. This has given British
courts the power of judicial review over Acts of Parliament. Therefore
courts can scrutinize Acts of Parliament, refer them to the European Court
of Justice and even suspend those Acts. However, Parliament is free to
withdraw Britain from the EU at any time, so technically sovereignty still
lies with Parliament.
So, upshot? Yes, Sovereignty lies with Parliament/Executive Branch of
HOWEVER, as you can see, at the point of elections, Sovereignty actually
lies with the people. It always truly has and that's exactly why "They work
for you". So let's say the population woke up one day and realized that the
three main parties simply were 3 legs of the same establishment tripod
(which they are). And let's even assume that this happened sometime after
the Lisbon Treaty was fully ratified.
IF we elected a brand new party into power who we KNEW would remove us from
the EU and, because we had realized the con of the false left/right paradigm
so we were "on the government's case” and ensured they did as WE THE PEOPLE
demanded of them, then that government (whoever it was) - because of the
fact that "Parliament cannot bind its successors" - could repeal ALL of the
laws and the EU policy within the UK and restore our sovereignty WHICH
belongs to US.
What could it do after that? It could re-instate laws which had been
repealed such as the TREASON LAWS and we could do what was necessary and
just to those who had been elected to office BY the people previously and
committed such treason.
Now, you may ask, how can I be sure I'm
right? Here's why.
So it would seem from this taken from the UK Parliament website:
THE LISBON TREATY AND THE UK CONSTITUTION
In this Chapter, we consider those features of the Lisbon Treaty that appear
to have direct implications for the UK constitution.
92. We now consider whether the Lisbon Treaty would change the relationship
between EU law and the principle of parliamentary sovereignty. Like the
current treaties, the Lisbon Treaty contains no express provision about the
principle, enunciated by the ECJ since 1963, that European law takes
priority over any inconsistent national law. Under this principle, any
national court or tribunal (from a bench of lay magistrates to the Appellate
Committee of the House of Lords) must immediately set aside any statutory
provision or other rule of national law which is determined to be
incompatible with EU law. However, Declaration 17 appended to the Lisbon
Treaty does state that "in accordance with well settled case law of the
Court of Justice of the European Union, the Treaties and the law adopted by
the Union on the basis of the Treaties have primacy over the law of Member
States, under the conditions laid down by the said case law". Dr Anthony
commented, though, that "the questionable legal status of such Declarations
may mean that the doctrine can only ever continue to lack an agreed basis"
93. The Government told us that the principle of the primacy of EU
law-whether formally articulated or not-does not have implications for
"Parliament exercised its sovereignty in passing the European Communities
Act 1972 and has continued to do so in passing the legislation necessary to
ratify subsequent EU Treaties. The UK Parliament could repeal the European
Communities Act 1972 at any time. The consequence of such repeal is that the
United Kingdom would not be able to comply with its international and EU
obligations and would have to withdraw from the European Union. The Lisbon
Treaty does not change that and indeed for the first time includes a
provision explicitly confirming Member States' right to withdraw from the
European Union" (p 21).
94. Dr Anthony told us that it "is highly unlikely that the new Treaty will
add anything to debates on the effects of EU membership" on parliamentary
sovereignty (p 11). Professor Chalmers agreed (p 14), as did Professor
Dashwood who explained that primacy of European Union law "remains a
principle developed in the case law of the ECJ" (p 17). We agree with this
95. We conclude that the Lisbon Treaty would make no alteration to the
current relationship between the principles of primacy of European Union law
and parliamentary sovereignty. The introduction of a provision explicitly
confirming Member States' right to withdraw from the European Union
underlines the point that the United Kingdom only remains bound by European
Union law as long as Parliament chooses to remain in the Union.
HUMAN RIGHTS LEGISLATION WHICH ATTACKS HUMAN RIGHTS!
Here is ANOTHER issue which I picked up on with this "so called" new Bill of
Recognize the deception in this. Recognize the "one way street" being
proposed under the "flag" of Human Rights/Bill of Rights. And remember also
that the establishment want you to forget about out existing 1688 Bill of
The Joint Committee on Human Rights
Background to proposals for a British Bill of
Rights and Duties
Standard Note: SN/PC/04559
Last updated: 3 February 2009
The Joint Committee on Human Rights announced in May 2007 that they would
hold an inquiry into a British Bill of Rights. Their report, A Bill of
Rights for the UK?, was published on 10 August 2008.
In short, the Committee recommended that the UK should adopt a Bill of
Rights and Freedoms "in order to provide necessary protection to all, and to
marginalized and vulnerable people in particular".
They stated that:
Adopting a Bill of Rights provides a moment when society can define itself.
We recommend that a Bill of Rights and Freedoms should set out a shared
vision of a desirable future society: it should be aspirational in nature as
well as protecting those human rights which already exist. We suggest that a
Bill of Rights should give lasting effect to values shared by the people of
the United Kingdom: we include liberty, democracy, fairness, civic duty, and
the rule of law.
Just ONE thing. Note: "and the rule of law"
The Committee recommended that some additional rights, such as the right to
trial by jury and the right to administrative justice should be included in
a Bill of Rights. They also considered the inclusion of environmental rights
(or 'third generation' rights as they are known).
The Committee did not
recommend fully justiciable social or economic rights but a situation where
the Government would have a duty to progress towards realizing certain
rights of this kind:
We suggest that the Bill of Rights and Freedoms should initially include the
rights to education, health, housing and an adequate standard of living.
Government would have a duty to progress towards realizing these rights and
would need to report that progress to Parliament. Individuals would not be
able to enforce these rights through the courts, but the courts would have a
role in reviewing the measures taken by Government.
Now, do you recognize it? Do you see the outright deception here? How the
Government will PROMOTE "Human Rights" and a "Bill of Rights" BUT,
ultimately, it is total nonsense?
No? Then let me explain:
"The Committee did not recommend fully justiciable social or economic
What does that mean? As follows:
Justiciability concerns the limits upon legal issues over which a court can
exercise its judicial authority.
Essentially, justiciability seeks to address whether a court possesses the
ability to provide adequate resolution of the dispute; where a court feels
it cannot offer such a final determination, the matter is not justiciable.
Upshot? If your Human Rights under a Bill of Rights is breached in any way,
you don't have recourse to complain. There's NOTHING you can do because the
matter is not "justiciable".
You could be beaten to a pulp and thrown in jail because you were a vocal
dissenter with ANYTHING the government did and you would have NO comeback.
(I hark back to my issue in Singapore)
Therefore bottom line: YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS. And, it will only get worse if we
allow it to by our apathy. Do NOT make the mistake of thinking it will never
impact your life. It does today and will tomorrow.
Yet, how would you respond to this:
"A Human being is born free and with
unalienable rights. As long as a human being causes no harm, loss or injury
to another human being then there is no higher authority which has power
over that "person" (be careful with the word "person"). Statutory
Legislation (Statute law) is NOT law, in fact, but is given the force of law
by the governed.
Statute law is, in fact, a form of commercial law and, as
such, is a form of contract. In being such, it requires an actual
contractual agreement between both parties and, therefore, the "person" must
accept to contract with the organization wishing to enforce such statute law
Think about the above.
There ARE no “rights” if they can be taken away -
which they are now and have been many times in history. They are granted
“privileges” yet you must ask yourself very fundamental questions here such
“Which person or group has a right, under law, to strip me of MY rights
- my inalienable rights - under ANY circumstances at all UNLESS I cause,
harm, injury or loss to another?”
The answer to this question can only be
Continuing the Sovereignty/Constitution/Treason issue:
The basis for the coronation oath, which forms part of the coronation
ceremony, is enshrined in statute in the Coronation Oath Act 1689. This Act
required the King William and Queen Mary, as joint monarchs, to swear an
oath during the coronation ceremony. The Act of Settlement 1701 and the
Accession Declaration Act 1910 make a statutory requirement on the monarch
to take the coronation oath.
The legal obligations surrounding the oath are set out in Halsbury's Laws:
28. The Crown's duty towards the subject. The essential duties of the Crown
towards the subject are now to be found expressed in the terms of the oaths
which every monarch is required to take before or at the coronation.
duties imposed by the coronation oath are:
to govern the peoples of the United
Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the dominions etc
belonging or pertaining to them according to their respective laws
to cause law and justice in mercy to be
executed in all judgments, to the monarch's power
to maintain the laws of god, the true profession of the Gospel, and the
protestant reformed religion established by law, to the utmost of the
By the Act of Settlements 4, it is declared that 'whereas the laws of
England are the birthright of the people thereof and all the kings and
queens who shall ascend the throne of this realm ought to administer the
government of the same according to the said laws and all their officers and
ministers ought to serve them respectively according to the same...the same
are....ratified and confirmed accordingly.
On 12 February 1688 a declaration was drawn up affirming the rights and
liberties of the people and conferring the crown upon William and Mary, then
Mary's children, and, failing any heirs, Princess Anne and her heirs; and
failing also that, William's heirs.
Once the declaration had been accepted
by William and Mary, it was published as a proclamation. The declaration was
subsequently enacted with some additions in the form of the Bill of Rights
1688, and the Acts of the Convention Parliament were subsequently ratified
and confirmed by the Crown and Parliament Recognition Act 1689 which also
acknowledged the King and Queen.
In this way, the Bill of Rights was
confirmed by a Parliament summoned in a constitutional manner and thereby
acquired the force of a legal statute and appears as such on the statute
I won't copy here the Bill of Rights WE HAVE since you can find them online
at your leisure.
What I WILL say is this however:
There is a working document in Parliament named "The Governance of Britain".
July 2007 Green Paper on constitutional reform, "The Governance of Britain".
The note sets out each proposal and progress made since the publication of
the Green Paper, including the contents of the Constitutional Renewal White
Paper and draft Bill published in March 2008. The Government has said that
it will bring forward legislation "when time allows".
One of the FOUR major proposals in it is as follows:
Britain's Future: the citizen and the state - this included a discussion of
the need to develop a British Statement of Values, and perhaps a British
Bill of Rights.
No British Constitution and Bill of Rights? Today, you hear Parliament,
Government and media discussing "A British Bill of Rights" WHEN WE ACTUALLY
But the fact we have one is hushed up! Ever wondered why?
On 25 March 2008 the Government published a White Paper and Draft Bill,
Governance of Britain: Constitutional Renewal.
Speaking in the debate on the Queen's Speech,
Jack Straw responded to
questions on the status of the constitutional renewal proposals as follows:
...The constitutional reform Bill is specified in the Gracious Speech.
Everyone knows that what has changed since then is the overriding imperative
of dealing with the world economic downturn, but the Bill will require
The Queen's Speech states:
"My Government will continue
to take forward proposals on constitutional renewal, including strengthening
the role of Parliament and other measures."
As ever, Her Majesty meant what she said-and that is my intention, too.
The Governance of Britain Green Paper was published by the Government a
matter of days after Gordon Brown became Prime Minister. The Labour
administrations of 1997-2007 oversaw major changes to the constitutional
structures and systems of the United Kingdom including the establishment of
devolved administrations in Scotland Wales and Northern Ireland and the
incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law.
And THAT is what this is all about. The entire Constitutional debate and the
promotion of "a British Bill of Rights" (when we already have one) and
changes to the Act of Settlement etc, is to have us slot into Europe - NOT
to think first of the rights of British Citizens. It's got nothing
whatsoever to do with us and the government AGAIN are pulling the wool over
The Green Paper echoes several proposals for constitutional change by the
Liberal Democrats in their 2007 paper Real Democracy for Britain, and by the
Conservative Party's Democracy Task Force, chaired by Kenneth Clarke.
Ken Clarke: Constitutional reform chaired by “MR. BILDERBERG”.
And as “Mr Bilderberg”, he works alongside Mr. Blair and Mr. Brown to
ACHIEVE what they are trying to achieve because BEFORE these people work for
the British people and British Government THEY WORK FOR
THE AGENDA OF BILDERBERG AND THE BANKERS WHO "OWN" them. Once the goals are achieved, they
personally do pretty well for themselves. as you may realize later.
Who, in this country of ours, would suggest that the present government
under Blair and Brown’s leadership, has conducted itself in the best
interests of the British Public?
We have had broken promises: No Referendum on the EU Constitution/Lisbon
Illegal Wars fought but NOT in our name and for an elite agenda which is
obvious when one has studied the subject in depth.
Gold sold at less than market price by what would appear to be a Chancellor
of exceptional incompetence. However, let’s have a closer look at this gold
sale. Is it possible there was a much larger agenda at work here while
certain people end their career in No.10 doing very well for themselves?
"Among five exemptions it has claimed to block publication is that “such
information relates to the location (past or present) of the UK’s gold
holdings, which, if made known, could increase risks to security”.
information is on the Bank’s official website."
Now consider this...
“First, the amount is limited to the portion of the Fund's gold
- about 400
tons - that had been sold and repurchased in a transaction about seven years
Second, the sales should be fitted in with the existing sales programs
of central banks, mainly European ones, so that they won't result in any
additional gold sales.
Third, the IMF should set up a group that examines
the technicalities of the marketing of gold.”
Now unless I'm mistaken, this secrecy about
who bought the gold is still
under wraps but let me just add this, as you will clearly recognize, there
was no-one else selling 400 tons of gold in that timescale except Gordon
Brown and Tony Blair. Not that I am aware of.
Now let's think this through a little.
JP Morgan were involved in the meeting with Brown when discussing the sale
of 400 tons of gold.
The IMF publication referred to, has the JP Morgan International President
stating the IMF bought 400 tons in the very same timescale.
Tony Blair leaves 10 Downing Street to land a windfall $2M/yr job with
Who “pimped” our Tony to the Banking establishment? Evelyn and Lynn De
Cozy isn’t it?
It is transparent. Unless the government wishes to open the entire detail of
the gold sale to the public to prove otherwise but, as with so many of the
government’s “little secrets” it is deemed “ Not in the Public interest”.
This phrase is a wonderful, all encompassing phrase which is actually
extremely deceptive. What it honestly means is that it is “Not in the
establishment’s interest that the public are aware”. The reality is that it
is ENTIRELY in the public’s interest to recognize the sheer scale of
corruption which is carried out by our government and establishment.
Think, for a moment, about the case of
Hollie Greig and the arrest of Robert
Green in Aberdeen on charges of “breach of the peace”. What “breach”? What
exactly did the man do? Answer: Nothing.
What he was about to do was to
bring it to the public’s attention that there had been long term sexual
abuse of a Down Syndrome child over a period of 14 years and members of the
establishment were implicated while other members covered it all up.
“breach of the peace” was solidly based upon the point that such information
being brought to light would, in establishment terms, not be “In the Public
Does this crystallize for you what “In the public interest”
actually means? Is it “in the public interest” for me to write this article?
of my thinking and simple straightforward questions which my representatives
in government refuse to answer. Would this be construed then as a “breach of
the peace”? If so, then what exactly is this “freedom and democracy’?
Someone once asked me the question,
"And since the treason laws apply to all who take the oath of allegiance,
how can the Sovereign commit treason when they don't take that oath? No one
takes an oath to themselves surely?"
Precisely! The Queen does NOT take an Oath to herself.
What is an Oath? It is to swear one shall carry out responsibilities.
The CORONATION OATH is just that.
Meanwhile, the QUEEN is NOT the MONARCHY. That is, the flesh and blood
person of the Queen is NOT the MONARCHY.
The flesh and blood person of the Queen takes on the RESPONSIBILITY of the
MONARCHY and is therefore the MONARCH.
The MONARCH is there to uphold the LAWS of this country. OUR SOVEREIGNTY has
been established by our having it protected FOR US by the MONARCHY.
Think of the Queen (and all those monarchs before her) as simply the CEO of
IF the CEO of a Corporation was found to be guilty of not performing their
duties and actually, perhaps, working against (embezzlement for instance)
the LAWS/POLICIES of the Corporation, they would be sacked and very possibly
jailed. They have, in effect, committed a treason of sorts.
Now, the Queen (the
human being) is JUST that! She swears an oath. Again,
the question remains: To who?
Meanwhile, it gets a little more complex because of the Sovereignty of
The Queen actually holds the sovereignty of the PEOPLE of the UK. The
PARLIAMENT work against this (actually the Executive Branch of the
Government) to strip away the sovereignty of the PEOPLE FROM Her Majesty.
They promote such as giving more "power" to Parliament and Parliament being
elected by the people etc....
The PROBLEM lies in the fact that the people, generally, are apathetic,
disinterested etc. So what happens is that the government hype the
"benefits" of Constitutional change while what they are actually doing is
subverting it to allow accession to the EU.
"if a man do levy war against our lord the King in his realm, or be
adherent to the King's enemies in his realm, giving to them aid and comfort
in the realm, or elsewhere"; comes into play doesn't it?
enemies NEED NOT use bombs and guns to wage war when their aims may be
achieved by subversion, stealth and economic means.
The Queen (the human being), by acquiescing to the government's agenda, is
in breach of her Constitutional DUTY and she is NOT protecting the subjects
of "her" Kingdom.
She has signed ALL EU treaties. She is allowing the sovereignty of the
nation to be passed into the hands of a subversive government who are then
passing OUR sovereignty to a FOREIGN POWER.
THE PRIVY COUNCIL
Taken from the UK Parliament website:
Privy Council is an ancient and dignified institution of government,
which has its origins in the earliest days of the monarchy.
The Privy Council goes back to the earliest days of the monarchy, when it
comprised those appointed by the King or Queen to advise on matters of
Monarchs would rule through the Privy Council without turning to
Parliament, and under Edward I it was difficult to identify whether
legislative acts emanated from the King-in-Parliament or the King-in-
Throughout the 14th century, however, there was a great deal of friction
between the Council and Parliament, and in the reigns of Henry IV and Henry
V there is evidence of the Commons petitioning the King against the
jurisdiction seized by the Council.
By this time the Council was exercising
judicial powers in relation to both criminal and civil litigation with
enforcement of the criminal law (where offences against the State were
alleged or officers of State were involved) carried out by the Court of Star
Chamber. Parliament therefore objected that the Star Chamber was usurping
the function of the common law courts.
With the rise of the Cabinet system of government in the 18th century, the
Privy Council gradually lost much of its powers.
Membership of the Privy Council is today a titular
honor, with the office
recognized as a reward for public and political service. Appointments are
made by the Sovereign on ministerial advice and are for life - there are no
fixed numbers of Members. By convention, all present and past Cabinet
Members are appointed to the Privy Council.
Also included in the membership
are members of the royal family, senior judges, two Archbishops, British
Ambassadors, the Speaker of the House of Commons, Prime Minister and Cabinet
Members, present and former leaders of the Opposition, and leading
Commonwealth spokesmen and judges.
The Council now numbers about 420
members, and members are entitled to the prefix 'Right Honorable.'
Now, THEIR OATH is as follows (in part):
"You will to your uttermost bear Faith and Allegiance to the Queen's
Majesty; and will assist and defend all civil and temporal Jurisdictions,
Pre-eminences, and Authorities, granted to Her Majesty and annexed to the
Crown by Acts of Parliament, or otherwise, against all Foreign Princes,
Persons, Prelates, States, or Potentates."
ALL FOREIGN PRINCES, PERSONS, PRELATES, STATES OR POTENTATES.
WHAT IS THE EU? IT IS A FOREIGN STATE NOT OF THE REALM!
It requires those taking it to 'keep secret all matters... treated of in
The Oath (or solemn affirmation for those who cannot take an Oath)
is still administered, and is still binding, but it is only in very special
circumstances nowadays that matters will come to a Privy Counsellor on
"Privy Council terms". These will mostly concern matters of the national
interest where it is important for senior members of Opposition parties to
have access to Government information.
Despite the many powers conferred by statutes on individual ministers, the
Order in Council remains a principal method of giving the force of law to
acts of the government, especially the more important executive orders.
The Judicial Committee has also in the past examined and reported on matters
of constitutional importance, such as the legal basis of the practice of
telephone tapping and matters affecting state security. A committee of six
Privy Counsellors reviewed British policy towards the Falkland Islands
leading up to Argentina's invasion in 1982; after the Prime Minster had
consulted with five former Prime Ministers to secure their consent, the
committee had access to the papers of previous governments and secret
I have also written to Mr Malcolm Chisholm MSP on this subject who has
suggested he would defer the entire question back to Mark Lazarowicz MP as
it is, in Mr Chisholm’s words “A UK matter and not a devolved matter”
(unlike the Hollie Greig issue which Mr Lazarowicz deferred on to Malcolm
I brought the following David Cameron speech to Malcolm’s attention:
“Never again should it be possible for a British Government to transfer
power to the EU without the say of the British people in a referendum.”
The European Communities Act 1972 can be amended to prohibit, by law, the
transfer of power to the EU without a referendum.
“This is a major constitutional development... Powers cannot be given
away without their EXPLICIT approval... after all, it is not politicians’
power to give away. The power belongs to the people.”
See and hear the entire speech below:
Now, while Mr. Cameron goes on to make promises and speak of “made up
referendums which would not stand serious scrutiny” the fact is he has drawn
a line under what has ALREADY been done by the British Government and DOES
NOT STAND SERIOUS SCRUTINY within the terms of our Constitution!
this yet he has stated CORRECTLY that the powers which the people of this
country PROVIDE to our government DO NOT INCLUDE the power to hand such
powers to a foreign entity such as the EU or ANY foreign entity.
Our constitutional documents are entirely clear on this and our government
(successive ones since Heath’s government of 1972 when he signed the EC Act
1972 - Sedition and treason according to Constitutional law) have proceeded
to do exactly that.
So, in ending this article, unless someone (anyone) can actually refute the
above content and what I am convinced 100% is the situation here (without
simply attempting the evasion of Ken Clarke that is), I would put this to
you very firmly: The sovereignty of the United Kingdom is being attacked
from without and such individuals, Banks and Corporations involved in this
attack, are being collaborated with from within.
That is nothing short of
war. It is true to suggest it is, to an extent, also an “Infowar” since the
people progressing this agenda know exactly what they are doing while the
vast majority of the populace are in blissful ignorance while they stare at
the TV news and wonder what is happening to our country.
Meanwhile, our present monarch, Elizabeth II, swears an Oath during her
coronation to US, the people and to the OFFICE of the Monarchy. If she did
NOT swear such an Oath, then just as William and Mary were offered the
Monarchy/Crown on the AGREEMENT and ACCEPTANCE of their DUTY as Monarch, if
Elizabeth had NOT sworn such an Oath, she would NOT have been crowned Queen.
Our entire body of law in this country flows from the Constitution and the
requirements and oaths taken by those who PROTECT that Constitution. If
those highest of laws can be broken in an effort to progress an agenda which
Mr. Rockefeller states so clearly has been his aim, then is it any wonder
why our country finds itself in a state of near anarchy?
An anarchy not
brought on by the people but orchestrated by our very government while our
“justice” system does not provide Justice but a purely revenue-driven,
“corporatisation” and corrupt version of “justice”.
The question is:
Has Elizabeth knowingly and purposefully broken her oath -
as have our Privy Council and our Parliamentarians over decades - or have
her hands been tied and she has been coerced?
New World Order and the subversion of our British
Constitution is no silly “Conspiracy theory”. It is a deadly serious matter
and is as clear as can be ONCE you do a little study, sit up and take notice
and connect a few dots.
To ignore it or state “What can I do about it?” is NOT good enough. If you
truly care for your children and, perhaps, THEIR children, then you have a
duty to them. A duty to ensure that their world is a safe, non corrupt and
free world. I have two children.
Their happiness and to inherit a peaceful
world is my ultimate goal.
People talk of “We’re British”. We have millions of people every week
attending football matches and thousands attending England and Scotland
International matches who suggest they strongly believe in their nation. I
have to tell you, supporting a football team while you speak of being proud
of your nation is all hot air and has no substance when you allow to happen
what I have just tried to explain to you.
The way forward in overcoming this threat however, is through an
understanding of it and educating others then using that knowledge
intelligently and peacefully to drive the change and ensure those who have
committed these crimes are held accountable.
This is the final part regarding the UK Constitution that has been extremely
complex but none the less extremely important. I sincerely hope that some
readers will take time out to study it in great deal and realize that all
the political parties are taking away out country brick by brick.
The current series will continue on with Part 7 which will cover the New
World Orders intimidation of Iran and their concerns regarding the
possibility of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons. It will reveal how both the
US and the UK allowed nuclear weapons to be stolen and yet at the same time
also reveal that these shonky deals became private transactions with the
political elite involved, their parties and the arms dealer.
can say with great confidence that we gave nuclear weapons away to countries
who they now call “The Axis of Evil.”
It is so sordid and corrupt that those involved are still playing leading
roles in the politics of today. They have become smart and arrogant and
think they are untouchable by law. Because of this gross neglect millions
have died unnecessarily and some of those key players are now attempting to
clear their names via the Chilcot inquiry.
This Iraq Inquiry is an absolute
farce and certainly does not go back far enough to encompass these missing
nukes. Cameron, Blair, Brown and many others on both sides of the pond
certainly have a lot to answer for.
However the New World Order protects its own with unlimited cash that was
stolen from the taxpayers of the world... will we see justice prevail?...
will we see heads roll?
Back to Contents
New World Order Threats, Neglects
15 April 2010 18:21
This article on the New World Order (NWO) will
cover some aspects of the build up to the Iraqi and Afghan Wars and how the
public was hoodwinked into believing that Iraq was a threat to the west.
will show how deceitful, two faced and ruthless our leaders, military
commanders, secret services, international banker, pharmaceutical companies
and weapons manufacturers are.
It will reveal how important it is for war and conflict to be permanently
part of our world in order to satisfy their greed for control of the world’s
How they will go to war in order to implement a long term
project that will reap in trillions of dollars. How they will set up “False
Flag” incidents so as to justify their actions.
How they are prepared to
sell or use Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) or Chemical and Biological
Warfare (CBW) in order to achieve their goals.
It will prove how the US, UK, EU and Israel are violating almost every
Geneva Convention in their past and current use of WMD’s in all theaters of
war. The knock on effect of our respective military actions is basically
genocide on a huge scale and no doubt fits in with the NWO policy of
depopulation. It will show how the NWO is prepared to sacrifice its own
respective populations for their aggressive greed by creating these “False
Flag” events such as Oklahoma Bombing and 9/11 etc.
Lets again go back in time and see not only how totally immoral/ethical our
leaders were and still are, but also how they are prepared to do under the
table deals in order to create wealth for their own purposes.
It will reveal
that although they condemn WMDs and CBW’s they not only design and
manufacture them but also frequently sell them to a country that favors
their own imperialistic growth.
Such organizations as the WB/IMF only have
one purpose in life and that is to put a country into untold debt and then
demand a drawdown on the money loaned with a huge profit margin.
The conditions attached to these loans basically hands over the
country to western control and eliminates any trade barriers.
effect from this is basically to kill the countries domestic markets/trade
and allow the west to infiltrate and take over those markets. It also tends
to take over public sector utilities such as power supply and water etc,
making them totally private with the associated escalating costs.
Basically this puts most utilities out of reach of the poor. Those that do
have a little surplus available cash are then drained of their earning and
this then plunges them into deeper poverty.
This is the NWO’s strategy to
take over, control and make all people subservient to those in authority.
The term “Make Poverty History” is an absolute joke and companies such as
the US Giant
Monsanto are a classic example of devious and aggressive
marketing... as a result of their Imperialistic push in India for
example… we now see the highest suicide rate of farmers in the world.
poor farmers, with whom I have spent much time, are forced to buy their GM
Modified) seeds which are totally reliant on Herbicides and Pesticide.
Farmer to also buy the Monsanto Pesticides in order for the crops to
flourish. After some years the soil dies and the farmer has to relocate.
Local traditional seed banks are then destroyed leaving them with no choice
but to continue buying the GM seed. They are not allowed, once signed up
with Monsanto, to save any local seed crop.
The farmers basically remain in
debt for most of their life and then take the easy way out!
We can start this timeline with another incident involving three missing UK
Battlefield Nuclear Bombs that were basically ready to use.
For many years
prior to this sordid deal South Africa had developed nuclear weapons. They
had, with the help of Israeli nuclear experts, made a total of 10 nuclear
bombs. One was test fired on a moored vessel near to Prince Edward Island
well south of South Africa leaving 9 bombs in storage.
It became clear that white control of South Africa was fast loosing power
and that soon a regime change would have to take place. One must also
understand that in addition to these nuclear weapons they were also working
on Chemical and Biological Weapons both of which were known to both the US
and UK governments.
However the UN were not informed or even aware of their
advancement into producing and testing nuclear weapons.
During this period
the “Iron Lady” herself (Margaret Thatcher), was fast loosing popularity
and desperately needed some funds in the Tory Coffers. The South African
Government were extremely concerned that power in South Africa would soon be
handed to the black community and did not want these nuclear weapons to fall
into their hands.
The US still claim to this day that they knew nothing of the nuclear test,
despite the fact that their satellites had pick up a double flash that one
normally associates with a nuclear a test.
One senior SA Naval Officer did
confirm that the test had been carried out and another source confirmed
that the US did know.
It was also a known fact that the nuclear experts
at Los Alamos issued a brief to their own associates (limited distribution).
This confirmed that the observation was a nuclear test. The reference for
this is Hones, E.W., D.N. Baker, and W.C. Feldman,
Evaluation of Some
Geophysical Events on 22 September 1979 (for limited distribution only),
After discussion with the US and UK governments it was decided to ship the 9
remaining nukes from
Pelindaba (the SA nuclear facility) via the Port of
Durban directly to Chicago. However, prior to this event taking place it was
decided that it may be a good idea for Britain to take 3 of the battlefield
nukes and have them on standby for Iraq.
In 1989, David Cameron, a young politician at the time went down to South
Africa with another more technical political figure to discuss how this
could be achieved.
Sir Kenneth Warren also had his finger in the pie to help bring all this
Those involved were a company called Armscor (The South African Arms Trading
Company), Astra (A British Arms Company) and the middle man, arms dealer
John Major also became part of this shonky deal as did
Thatcher and many private investors. What was also unusual about this, under
the table covert operation, was the involvement of the British DTI, rather
than just the MOD. The money for acquiring these weapons was processed via
the MOD but the whole deal was arranged via the DTI for some strange reason!
Not normal don’t you think?
In order to keep this out of Parliament and out of the public domain Maggie
Thatcher was asked to sign off these weapons under a special Urgent
Operational Requirement (UOR) and was shown as metal cylinders and not
nuclear bombs. This was done completely under the table and this knowledge
was not known to anyone else.
The UOR document was signed before she left
office in late 1990.
The next phase was that once the weapons had left South African soil,
arrived at destination and physically checked, the British Government would
then reimburse ARMSCOR (SA) and Astra (UK) and the middle man, arms dealer
John Bredenkemp all at the expense of the British Tax Payer.
I must also add that around this same time the Thatcher Government
was also actively involved in overseeing Chemical and Biological Warfare (CBW)
in both South Africa and at Porton Down, UK.
We know that Dr. David Kelly (above
himself been visiting South Africa on behalf of the British Government
regarding the CBW but was also responsible for the safe delivery of the
three SA/UK nukes from Durban to Oman.
Dr. Kelly also frequently hosted the
SA CBW team at Porton Down etc.
It was Dr. Kelly’s own responsibility to make sure the three nukes were safe
for transit and also to receive them in Oman and sign them off, prior to the
release of monies. Dr. Kelly had first hand knowledge of this under the
table deal and also knew much about the sexed up document “Iraq Dossier" that
Alistair Campbell had carefully manipulated.
Kelly had also been part of the
team to check out Iraq regarding the WMD’s. He knew that there was no case
for going to war and threatened to become a sort of whistleblower… that
cost him his life and he was assassinated when they knew that he could blow
the lid on the whole issue and that this could sink Blair and the Labour
Government... as well as incriminating the Tories and David Cameron.
As I have already discussed in a previous article, a B52 bomber crashed into
the sea north of Diego Garcia in February 1991.
This aircraft was carrying
SRAM Nuclear Missiles (the earlier version of today’s Cruise Missile). These
earlier weapons were extremely unstable and in the event of some in flight
emergency one would truly have to plan what to do with your lethal cargo
load. The B52 could carry around many more of these SRAM’s but we are told
there were only three onboard.
All of this was under the watchful eye of Dick Cheney who was US Secretary
of Defense at the time. It became clear that he was in a very serious
position, especially when US intelligence believed that the weapons had been
recovered (stolen) and then sold by a notorious arms dealer John Bredenkamp.
It became apparent that Dick Cheney had not made any attempt to find or
recover these weapons until after May of the same year and furthermore had
not attempted to report them as missing.
Stephen P. Dresch, a former American forensic intelligence officer with the
CIA had valuable information about Cheney.
This was indeed a very serious
oversight by Cheney which clearly violated international law.
The SRAM’s had
W-69 nuclear warheads and it was believed at the time that they were sold to
Iran… This is why intelligence officers are trying to track down Bredenkamp
for a “False Flag” BAe deal in order to get him in custody and then try to
find out from him who received the missing weapons. It was believed at the
time that John Bredenmap received around 8.5 tons of gold for the deal.
I read an article relating to Dresh’s knowledge of Cheney’s neglect and one
other very interesting comment:
“Stephen's full report would show that Dick
Cheney in 2002 had a reason for wanting to see the Iraq Dossier sexed-up
with the false report on Yellowcake from Niger.
Humphry Crum Ewing was
political adviser on military and intelligence matters to John Major at
No.10 Downing Street at the time and he told recently that even though he
had never heard of the event with the B-52 losing the nukes, because of
other things that he knew, to him it made complete sense."
You may say what has this to do with the New World Order?
The answer is
simply an awful lot because it’s all part of the “False Flag” and deceit
that this organization hands out on a regular basis. They are prepared to do
almost anything to achieve their master plan. If this involves selling
weapons to your potential enemy, then that is fine! If it involves killing
thousands such as 9/11 then that is also ok!
If it means telling the world
that you are reducing ballistic nuclear weapons when in actual fact you are
mass producing smaller nukes and telling the public that these are
conventional weapons, then that’s how it goes! If you intentionally sell WMD
or CBW to use against someone you don’t like then that is also ok!
if you ignore good intelligence advice and still go to war or leak secret or
highly confidential information to an ally then that’s the name of the game.
As an example:
Ex-CIA agent says Bush ignored WMD intelligence
The CIA's former top official in Europe has revealed that President
ignored intelligence that Iraq did not have weapons of mass destruction.
CIA had evidence Iraq possessed no weapons of mass destruction six months
before the 2003 U.S.-led invasion but was ignored by White House intent on
ousting Saddam Hussein, a former senior CIA official said according to CBS.
The official, Tyler Drumheller, said former CIA Director George Tenet
personally told Bush and Vice President Cheney that Iraq’s foreign minister
had admitted to U.S. spies that Iraq had no WMD program. Drumheller said the
information was ignored.
He told 60 Minutes:
"The policy was set. The war in
Iraq was coming and they were looking for intelligence to fit into the
Then there was the case when Condoleezza Rice was accused of leaking highly
classified military intelligence on Iran to a pro-Israel lobbyist in the
same manner that landed a lower-level Pentagon official a 12-year prison
sentence. The allegation was in regard to two former lobbyists from
the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
The lobbyists were charged
with receiving and disclosing national defense information. Lawyers for the
men asked a federal judge to subpoena Rice to testify in order to show that
top Bush administration officials approved of disclosing sensitive
information to the defendants and that the leaks may have been authorized.
Then there was the suppression of Israeli War Crimes and a huge list of
other Human Rights issue in Palestine that was totally blanked out in the UK
regarding shellings, killings, robberies, savage beatings, attacks on
schools and infrastructure, home demolitions, kidnappings, the use of sewage
as a weapon, and more. Virtually all of these Israeli government, military
and settler crimes went unreported.
Obviously the Goldstone report and many other reports are all now swept
under the carpet thanks to AIPAC and their influence in US Congress. The
same applies in the UK with the Friends of Israel lobby group handing out
huge backhanders in return for favors... yes my friends this is all linked to
the bigger picture including the New World Order and the Freemasons etc.
Just when you think you have heard it all we have “Project Coast” down in
South Africa that involved the use of CBW to reduce the black population in
This project was refereed to as being the “Black only Bomb”... we can
go back even further when CBW was used in the old Rhodesia with the full
support of the British Government.
All of this was known to dear Maggie
Thatcher (our then Prime Minister), John Major who took over, that young
flamboyant politician David Cameron… not forgetting Sir KW and sidekick DW.
This knowledge also extended over the pond to the US President, Dick Cheney,
Donald Rumsfeld and so many others of the crooked political elite.
When one links all of this together with the missing nukes and realise that
not only did we get it all wrong but we also went to war with the wrong
country (if it was ever justified anyway). We are talking here about an
extremely serious crime... Tony Blair could fall victim to the special Jail
provisions as contained in his Nuclear Explosions Act of 1998.
This not only
involved all those listed above but also senior members of the British Labour Party who became privy to this information. When one considers that
millions have died in Iraq and Afghanistan (without even counting our own
coalition forces) as a direct result of their imperialistic greed and deceit
is beyond words.
All these senior political elite are part of the New World Order and it
doesn’t stop there... what about the CBW attack on the Iranians and the
Kurds... this know how and the appropriate means to carry out these attacks
was masterminded by the US, UK and other EU countries...
As I said, there is no
limit to the level to which they will go… how can you place a vote to
any party that has such dirty washing to hang out?
Dr. David Kelly was a very brave man but knew too much and paid the
ultimate price for caring for his country and for not wanting us to go to
war over these lies.
There are many other David Kelly’s around with the same
information and soon the bubble will burst... the
Chilcot Inquiry was an
absolute disgrace and a total farce…we should all demand this worthless
inquiry to be revisited and for the truth to come out!
What is so frightening now is the fact that the G3.5, as I call it (US, UK,
France and Germany), are again on an advanced war footing with Iran. We have
the usual over reactive response from Israel, despite the fact that they
themselves will not allow the world to checks their own nuclear activities!
They have such powerful military might for a country so small and a nuclear
arsenal of WMD’s that continues to grow unchecked. They sit on the sideline
crying like a little lamb searching for its mother! All of them together as
now trying to rally for support from other nations so as to apply direct
pressure on the UN which they control anyway.
Obama (The New World Order’s
Chosen One) is spreading fear into the hearts of people regarding terrorism
and concern about nuclear weapons falling into the wrong hands.
I have to
“Nuclear Weapons and CBW have already fallen into the wrong hands,
namely - US, UK, EU and Israel!"
Can we say with any sincerity that the world can trust these countries?
Could it be that they themselves are the “Axis of Evil”?
Does Al Qaeda and
any terrorism, on the scale they tell us about, really exist?
The answer is
simply no… they have conjured up an imaginary army to justify the creation
of a police state in all of their countries and re enforced this with many
“False Flag” incidents to shock us all into believing it.
Surely even with
basic education you do not believe these “New World Monster” that walk the
corridors of our governments and organizations such as:
The list is almost endless and never ending.
Back to Contents
Leaders put their own countries at risk
20 April 2010
In Part 7 we covered a couple on incidents that
revealed the greed and neglect of the US and UK Government.
It clearly shows
that the New World Order (NWO) will go to any length to either fulfill their
master plan, attract funds to their coffers or to, in some cases have their
own palms brushed with gold.
The deplorable actions and gross neglect as carried out by past Presidents
George Bush Senior and Junior and the UK Prime Ministers Thatcher, Major,
Blair and Brown are beyond words.
These elitists, that are supposed to not
only govern out countries but also to protect us, do in actual fact put us
all at great risk.
If you can recall I discussed the circumstances leading up to
the theft of 3
nuclear weapons belonging to the US and the theft of another three nuclear
weapons that belonged to the UK. It became clear that in case of the US
missiles there was some intentional delay by Dick Cheney in his attempt to
They were dumped into the ocean in early February 1991 but no
attempt to recover them was made until May of the same year, by which time
they had been stolen.
The story was all hinged around a Seychelles deep sea diving/treasure
salvage team who were in actual fact part of a South African arms smuggling
operation into Somalia. These groups were responsible for the recovery of
dumped weapons off the coast and bringing them to onshore Somalia. It was
after the B52 had jettisoned its unstable nuclear weapons load off the coast
of Somalia that this bogus diving company came across the nukes, took
details from the ID plate on the missiles and after some enquires found them
to be the US SRAM missiles.
John Bredenkamp was linked to this arms smuggling/gun running exercise and
benefited significantly from the sale of the US nukes... I am led to believe
we are looking at a payment of around 7.5 kgs of gold bullion.
became apparent that the private sector was also involved in this under the
radar operation that was never made known to the United Nations or the world
It is very important to understand that these Presidents and Prime
Ministers really do not care and they use such devious means of obtaining
huge amounts of money for their own needs or to increase the cash flow of
their political party funds.
They are also ruthless in carrying out “False
Flag” type operations to enhance or justify an action that embraces their
long term strategy. This is typical of the New World Order. It would also be
suffice to say that some of the elite
Christian Zionists and Jewish Zionists
around the world are more than happy to have untold amounts of people
exterminated to reach their goals.
It is for this reason that I believe that some of those elite Jewish New
World Order members are willing to see the “Genocide” of their Jewish
brothers in Israel. It has now been proven that the DU issue is now playing
a major role in the contamination of Israel.
Add to this the fact that they
are also happy for Israel to take up arms against Iran and become literally
“The Sacrificial Lamb” to achieve their own goals.
As far as the US missing nukes are concerned it is now obvious that the key
players in these lies and deceit were the President at the time George Bush
Snr. and Dick Cheney. This was then followed by George Bush Jr. and again
Dick Cheney. Basically the rot did not go away and many other very senior US
Government and Military officials had their fingers in the pie and as a
direct result of their covert operations allowed thousands if not millions
of people to die unnecessarily.
They are to this day still trying to find who John Bredenkamp sold them
too... the answer to this big question really lies within their own
government as they were implicated.
Now the US is trying to corner Bredenkamp on some other unrelated deal in order to get him in custody.
It would appear that the first North Korean nuclear explosion or attempted
explosion was one of those missing weapons… now one can see how things
escalate around the world as a direct result of the neglect of these satanic
So who has the other two nuclear weapons…it really doesn’t matter
because nuclear weapons have never been used since the second world war and
only serve as a deterrent. Our leaders don’t want you to believe that... they
would rather spread fear and panic into our minds by telling us that some
other country must be stopped from the development of WMD in order to make
our streets safer.
I would like to add at this stage that the world in general is safe... no
such threat exists and no threat from terrorism exists…
Its all a make
believe scenario by the New World Order to achieve their insane plans of
ruling the world, its natural resources and to control the populations in a
police state type environment.
President Obama is playing out a screen acting role of pretending to stop
WMD’s when in actual fact he his intensifying the manufacturing of mini
WMD’s that the US call “Conventional weapons,” I urge you all to fully
understand this is a total cover-up.
The US, UK, Coalition Forces and the IDF are very discreetly and secretly using WMD each and every day in all
areas of conflict... this is currently in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Gaza, Yemen
This amounts to mass genocide on a big scale involving the populations of
the entire Middle East and the World Beyond as well as all their respective
troops taking part in such operations.
I had to laugh when I read the other day that Saudi Arabia was well prepared
for any potential nuclear fallout from a possible attack on Iran... I have to
say that this is absolutely impossible and there is no defense from such an
The very fact that Saudi Arabia would turn a blind eye to any US or IDF forces using its territory is a crime against its own Muslim brothers.
In my previous articles I made it totally clear that any attack on Iran’s
nuclear facilities would be catastrophic for the entire Middle East. If one
can imagine the attacking forces, using in mass, weapons that contain
uranium components, on nuclear facilities... one doesn’t need any imagination.
I would like to ask the Arab States (that are US/UK friendly) to reconsider
their stance in relation to opposing Iran and look deeper into this emerging
plan of the New World Order.
Will they support the death and destruction of
Islamic Lands (which has already started)?
Will they allow US/UK/Coalition/IDF
forces to use their territory in any such attack against another fellow
Muslim country and will they allow the catastrophic contamination of the
entire Middle East?
We are talking here of an initial fallout stretching from West of Turkey to
East of Pakistan and India. From North of the Caspian Sea to South of the
This will only take 2 to 3 days at most.
contamination will then spread around the world on the wind and cover most
of mother earth within a month. We are looking at a fallout much greater
than the bombs dropped on Japan and contamination far greater that
Chernobyl... Can the Arab League agree to such an attack. Please do not be
brainwashed that your country is prepared for this event... there is no escape
from these nano particles that will encircle our countries…even gas masks
are no barrier.
So to Saudi I say stop pulling the wool over the eyes of
your people and see things as they actually are.
To the governments of Kuwait, Bahrain, UAE, Oman, Yemen, Syria,
Lebanon, and Jordan I urge you to seriously look into the problems that we
in the West are currently creating.
There is no logic in these wars and
threats... its nothing to do with democracy or nuclear disarmament but rather
the New World Order strategy to protect the
Industry and to take control of the world’s natural resources or secure
major world energy contracts... it has already applied to the Balkans,
Georgia, Iraq and Afghanistan.
The US and its allies are now trying to interfere in Yemen and Somalia in
order to secure more resources and more importantly establish a major
military base in the Gulf of Aden to control the vital shipping lanes into
and out of the Red Sea/Suez Canal - Mediterranean. Likewise the trade routes
from the US/EU via the Mediterranean to Central and Southeast Asian etc.
I would urge the Arab League to say enough is enough and insist that these
wars and conflicts stop immediately. Send all the troops home, close down
all “Western Military Bases on Islamic Soil" and start trading instead of
We are killing each other and more importantly we are killing our
planet and its residents!!
I could make a long list of the “Elite US Criminals”... but maybe I would run
out of paper... the short list would have to include
Bush Snr. and
Rumsfeld, Cheney, Power, Rice, Bremer, Bolton, Wolfowitz, Schwarskoff and at
the top of the list Kissinger...
We would also have to add all those who
arranged and planned the collapse of the world’s financial markets, namely
the Rockafella’s Rothchilds and all those organizations linked with the New
World Order who have spread despair and poverty to thousands upon thousands
British Senior Politicians put UK at risk
23 April 2010
In my previous article (Part 8) I discussed the
three US nuclear weapons they were dumped in the ocean and then stolen. This
gross neglect by the US Government has basically caused the situation that
exists today with thousands if not millions dead and for no apparent cause.
In this final part we will look at who were the alleged players in this
corrupt under the table deal and why are they still free to roam the country
without any further investigation. I suppose some would say that this is
covered by the Chilcott Inquiry but that certainly is not true and further
more it is a total scam with all parties tightly involved with the current
We will look at this later on in this article.
So let’s just refresh our minds as to what
happened some years ago when the British Government acquired three
Battlefield Nuclear Bombs from South Africa which was in total violation of
the embargo on Africa.
The fact that conservative party representatives also
traveled to South Africa to carry out this deal were all in breach of this
The key players in this deal were a British Company called “Astra” who was
headed by Gerald James and
the South African Company Armscor.
In the middle was John Bredenkamp, the same arms
dealer who snatched the US ASRAM nuclear missiles from under the nose of the
USA. At a political level we have the alleged involvement of Maggie
Thatcher and David Cameron who went to South Africa on an all expense paid
jolly care of Armscor in 1989. It was believe that Sir Kenneth Warren, who
was the only technical person around, also went and possibly David
We must fully appreciate that what this gang of rogues were doing at the
time was not only extremely dangerous but also very foolish to say the
least. Can one imagine the ruling government getting involved in Weapons of
Mass Destruction (WMD) and Chemical and Biological Warfare (CBW) without
anyone knowing about it?
Doing deals under the table away from the eyes
of the UN and the British Members of Parliament? Then not only buying these
illegal weapons but also relocating them to Oman with no security
measurements in place.
All this was arranged before the “Iron Lady” left
Dr. David Kelly was not only assigned to look
after visits from South African CBW experts to Porton Downs, but was also
responsible for the safe dispatch and arrival of the nuclear weapons.
It was David who signed the bombs off in Oman
after he had inspected them which then allowed payment by the MOD via the
DTI to all those concerned.
One must keep in mind that these weapons were not secure as we will learn
later. As a result of the visit by David Cameron and his sidekick to South
Africa the Conservative party were able to take a percentage commission of
the purchase and add it to their own election campaign funds. Can you
imagine that right from the start the financial paper trail was absolutely
The payment was processed by the DTI and not the
normal process via the MOD. The bombs were disguised as being just simple
cylinders and were signed off by Maggie Thatcher as an Urgent Operational
Requirement (UOR) and in doing so it was not made known to Parliament. It is
even possible that Ken Clarke also knew the nuclear situation as some
reference was made of him.
The amount of money received by the Conservative Party for this shonky deal
was £17.8 million which came out of the payment i.e. British Tax Payers
This issued was raised in the House of Commons:
HANSARD 22nd June 1993 we can find the following:
Mr. Hoyle: If the hon. Gentleman will
allow me, I shall tell him what information is now given to us. We
understand the expenditure and what Tory central office receives. In
1992, central office received £20.7 million. When we asked about that
and about company donations, the Tory party told us to look at company
I repeat: in 1992, the Tories received £20.7 million. When the records
were checked by Companies house, only £2.9 million was shown in company
accounts. That means that there is a deficit of £17.8 million.
to know where that £17.8 million came from!
To this day this money has not been accounted
for but the Ex-CEO of Astra, Gerald James, certainly knew the paper trail of
accounts which was listed on Page 6 of his report.
As a matter of interest Gerald James was
scheduled to give evidence at another trial called “Matrix Churchill”…
Gerald was to have been the Star Witness but the entire trial was scuttled
intentionally so as to hide the nuclear issue and the identity of those
Poor Dr. David Kelly knew everything from WMD’s to CBW’s and the true
situation in Iraq and for that reason he was assassinated in order to
protect the governments reason for going to war. As we know Alastair
Campbell sexed up the Iraq Dossier to justify going to war.
Whilst these three weapons were in storage in Oman the loads were switched
and the three battlefield nukes were stolen. Obviously with the lack of good
security it was easy for John Bredenkamp to do a good deal and onward sell
them to another rogue nation. By this time he had accumulated significant
As part of this sordid deal Bernie Ecclestone
the F1 guy was able to slip Tony Blair another one million pounds which was
written off to the Tobacco Industry but in reality was part of the bomb
Again please understand that many of these non ethical leaders form part of
the New World Order and seize any opportunity to acquire wealth at no matter
the cost. It is also evident that both Blair and Brown were aware of these
three missing nukes… the problem was that nobody could discuss the theft or
the terrible potential consequences of their neglect due to the fact that
this was all under the radar of the UN and most other people.
The three nukes were in Iraq for a little while but then were transported in
three ambulances to Syria. That was the last known location of these
So what does all this mean to us, the voting
public, when it comes to casting your vote.
Would you trust Cameron who took
part in this terrible game of find the missing nuke or would you vote for
Brown, who knew the truth but did not reveal anything at the Chilcott
Would you vote for Clegg, whose party dismissed
Jenny Tonge because the Israeli Lobby Group objected to her
Jenny always told things as they were and she
really believed that Palestine had become the victim of Israeli aggression.
It was obvious that the Lib Dem Friends of Israel had received a substantial
donation for their election party funds and turned their back on Jenny in
order to protect their investment.
Let’s now turn our attention to the so called impartial Chilcott Inquiry.
Was this a fair and honest inquiry or was it a total scam so as to allow the
New World Order puppets to clear their respective names and come out clean?
So why was this Chilcott Inquiry so important... it was part of the New
World Orders plan to get Blair off the hook so that he can become the EU
President... the current holder is purely acting as a caretaker until the
Chilcott inquiry clears Blair.
I believe that if Brown gets to fall behind in the polls he may well draw
out his ace card which is to bleat on Blair in order to gain some ground.
What is very interesting here is the fact that if all of the Conservative
and Labour elite could be connected to this unspeakable crime then they
would all end up in jail together under the
Nuclear Explosions Act.
It remains clear, prior to the Gulf War, that Bush and Blair wanted a regime
change. It is also clear that if nuclear weapons are a valid reason for
going to war then we went to war with the wrong country. Can we ever imagine
that such a terrible mistake was made resulting in millions of civilian
lives being lost and for what?
Add to this the thousands of soldiers killed or
who were contaminated by the weapons that contained uranium components and
the trillion of dollars of tax payer’s money that has paid for these wars.
Now we see the New World Orders master plan coming into existence with the
forced financial collapse, company closures, mass unemployment, loss of home
and the communities totally raped of their basic requirements.
The next step is to further tax the poor and
bring everyone down to a mere existence with cutbacks in education, health
and social care making everyone subservient to the superior elite.
Before leaving the final part of this series, many of you would ask how
could nuclear weapons go missing, how do we know this actually happened and
why hasn’t anyone talked about it.
The answer is very simple… the culprits that
became involved in this under the table corrupt covert operation could not
reveal anything outside of their close circle of friends as it was all in
violation of the South African Embargo and also the fact it was hidden from
the United Nations.
This is why John Bredenkamp was allowed to do
whatever he wanted knowing that he had the politicians under his thumb… they
basically were gagged because of their involvement in this highly illegal
So how do we know these weapons actually moved from South Africa to Oman?
First you have to understand that when you are shipping such sensitive and
extremely dangerous items one has to send out tenders and then decide how to
move them. Obviously it cannot be done in the conventional way and so these
three weapons had to be moved very discreetly.
The main plan was to use some out of the way
location and obtain equipment that could handle the weapons (hence the
Once they arrived in Oman they would be stored in a facility that was
indirectly controlled by Bredenkamp, knowing that he could, at a later
stage, arrange for them to be stolen.
He know this was a relatively easy thing to do
knowing that Thatcher, Cameron, Sir Kenneth Warren, David Wiltshire, John
Major, Ken Clarke, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown any many more would not be able
to do anything about it i.e. knowing that all of them were either accessory
before or after the fact!
We are looking here at an extremely serious
crime being committed by both main parties and that is why the Matrix
Churchill Enquiry failed in its infancy and also why the current Chilcott
inquiry is so restrictive in its timeline.
It was orchestrated in such a way that this
incident fell well outside the terms of reference.
We should also add to this, that it appear rather strange that this
independent inquiry is operating out of the Cabinet Office and is therefore
being controlled and manipulated by Gordon Brown himself!
How can the truth
ever come out when everything from the pre arranged questions to the answers
are known to all taking part... one can already draw your own conclusion as
to what the end report will say... something along the lines that all
parties acted in the best interest of the country in protecting the UK from
When those weapons were switched and stolen why didn’t our government have
security in place to secure their dangerous investment? Why didn’t we know
they were missing until the 20 foot sea containers arrived in Chicago
without the weapons onboard?
Between the event of knowing they had been stolen and up to the current time
we now know that the weapons were moved out of Baghdad into Syria via
ambulances. Perhaps this is connected to the fact that Israel bombed a
Syrian Nuclear Facility in the hope of destroying any such weapon.
brings us back the question as to who knew what and when. One thing for sure
is that Blair, Brown and others lied at the
Chilcot inquiry… they knew and
still know that the three US nuclear weapons that were stolen and the other
three SA/UK Battlefield Bombs were stolen by the same dealer and then sold.
The Conservative and Labour parties still have a dilemma because we now
understand that the first attempted nuclear explosion by North Korea was one
of the US nukes and that the second explosion on the 25th of May 2009 was
one of the stolen British nukes.
That leaves us with one big question: where
are the other four missing nukes (2XUS and 2XUK)?
Indications show that Iran may have received a
couple and if this is the case,
No one has every used such a weapon
This cat and mouse game reveals that the “Axis
of Evil” is right here in the West and forms part of the New World Order
with London as its main operating base.
No wonder the political elite in this country
are clutching at straws in order to protect themselves and come out clean...
do we think Blair’s attempt to gain Presidency of the EU is over... most
Please understand that all three main parties are totally corrupt either by
their own involvement in the above fiasco or by there excessive lean towards
Israel. Keep in mind that David Cameron’s trip to South
Africa was paid for by Armscor, the people who made the 10 Battlefield Bombs
But as I said we cannot put all the blame on Thatcher and her
group of irresponsible idiots… Blair and Brown are also right in there… I am
sure that one of these two gentlemen would like to recover some extremely
sensitive documents that incriminates them… but that’s another story.
Before closing we should just take a quick look at Armscor:
They were the South African Armaments Corp
who were operating as a totally illegal company because of UN sanctions
against the Apartheid regime.
The White Government of South Africa were
worried about the Black takeover and after consultation with the US and the
UK Government it was decided to send the remaining 9 weapons back to Chicago
for de commissioning (one weapon had already been test fired on a vessel
moored off a small island atoll South of South Africa).
It is obvious that Armscor had something for sale and that they did not want
the outside world to know about it?
The South Africans made the battlefield nuclear
bombs at their covert nuclear establishment at Pelindaba, near Pretoria
(with the technical help of Israel). It is clear that an agreement was
reached between Bush and the UK Government for the UK to take three of the
nukes and put them on standby in Oman, for a possible strike against Saddam
in Iraq .
If one can relate to Blair’s comments before the war when he said that Iraq
had WMD’s ready for deployment in 45 mins!... could it be that he was
referring to those weapons being carried in the ambulances that could,
realistically, be ready to go at 45 minutes notice... now maybe you can
start to put this pathetic jigsaw together.
So there you have it… believe it or not.
Would you place a vote for Cameron, Brown or
Clegg based on the information provided? Who can you vote for when basically
nothing is left? Whatever the outcome and whoever gets in, one thing clearly
sticks out here, that both the two main parties were involved in very
sinister under the table operations and clearly in bed with the private
sector, arms dealers and , investors.
In the case of Maggie Thatcher’s it
became a family business investment with her son, Sir Mark Thatcher.
Don’t you find it obscene that now one can
obtain a Lordships or Knighthoods just to keep silent or as a thank you for
adding vast sums of money to private and party funds?
It is also incredible that a man that disgraced
his party on two occasions and who joined as a rep in the EU returned to the
UK as a Lord and continues to ravish our industry.
You may choose not to vote for these monster this year or alternatively
maybe you will select some insignificant independent to voice your objection
to the main parties. Whatever you decide, take care in your selection and
stop the New World Order in its tracks
Finally to add further pain to our country, the New World Order’s angel
of mercy, the not so Right Honorable Mr.
Alistair Darling has
indicated that the UK my well have to call on the IMF for assistance...
That will truly be a disaster for us but
a bonus for the IMF which forms part of the New World Order.