by Steven Guinness
August 29, 2020
has defined and
is leading the global stampede
into "The Great
that would kill
Capitalism and Free Enterprise,
The World Economic Forum (WEF)
is arguably steeped in
In September, it will
Sustainable Development Impact Summit
Its website clearly links
"The Great Reset" to Sustainable Development:
COVID-19 crisis wreaked havoc
on societies and economies and dealt a major setback to
achieving the 2030 Agenda and the Paris Climate Agreement.
Putting the world
back on a path of sustainable, equitable, and inclusive growth
will require more than a global recovery; it
will require a Great Reset of
social and economic systems.
This is Technocracy's
In my book,
Technocracy - The Hard Road to World Order,
I dedicated an entire chapter to this titled Technocracy is
The chapter concludes,
After an exhaustive
historical inquiry, I can confidently state that the only
specifically-designed replacement economic model created in the
history of the world was:
Thus, it is clear that Sustainable Development is Technocracy.
Making this connection now will help the reader to understand
the balance of this book in its proper context. The Sustainable
Development movement has taken careful steps to conceal its true
identity, strategy and purpose, but once the veil is lifted, you
will never see it any other way.
Once its strategy is
unmasked, everything else will start to make sense.
What people most commonly fail
to see is that if the economic system is radically changed, then
everything changes. Technocracy's coup d'etat is not political - it
Last month I
posted an article that looked at
the World Economic Forum as the institution behind 'The Great Reset'
agenda that was launched in June.
One of the main themes of
the article was the WEF's 'Strategic Intelligence platform', which
the organization describe as,
'a dynamic system of
contextual intelligence that enables users to trace
relationships and interdependencies between issues, supporting
more informed decision-making'.
As I made reference to,
is the mechanism
which brings all the interests that the WEF focus on together.
This includes specific countries and industries, as well as
global issues like Covid-19 and the Fourth Industrial
When you look into
Strategic Intelligence, one aspect to it that quickly becomes
apparent is how each global issue and industry intertwines with one
Covid-19 is a strand
of 'The Great Reset' and vice versa...
What this does is create
the impression that only a collectivized approach
incorporating all 'stakeholders' has the capacity to deal with
crises on a global scale.
The WEF is built upon the
belief that nations and corporations must be interdependent and seek
to remedy the world's problems through the medium of global
So it is little surprise then that the WEF have devised through
their Strategic Intelligence platform 'The
What this entails can be categorized into
First are the
seven leading objectives for achieving the reset.
In no particular
order these are:
the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Sustainable Business Models
Health of the Environment
Social Contracts, Skills and Jobs
Next comes a
mix of global issues and industries woven into 'The Great Reset'
At last count there
were over fifty areas that make up the reset.
Digital Identity; Internet Governance; Development
Finance; Sustainable Development; Future of Health and
Healthcare; Global Governance; Financial and Monetary
Systems; Public Finance and Social Protection; Climate
Change; Drones; 5G
Banking and Capital Markets; Aviation, Travel and
Tourism; International Trade and Investment; Covid-19;
Biodiversity; Cities and Urbanization; Leadership in the
4IR; Geo-economics; Global Health; International
Security; Geopolitics; Future of Food; Air Pollution; 3D
Economy; Future of Mobility; Human Rights; Gender
Parity; Taxation; Future of Media, Entertainment and
Culture; Digital Economy and New Value Creation; Fourth
Industrial Revolution; Future of Economic Progress;
Workforce and Employment; Agile Governance; Global
Risks; Advanced Manufacturing and Production
and Natural Resource Security; Plastics and the
Environment; Corporate Governance; Forests; Justice and
Law; Civic Participation; LGBTI Inclusion; Inclusive
Design; Future of Computing; Artificial Intelligence and
Robotics; Systemic Racism
As mentioned, all these
subjects intermix throughout Strategic Intelligence.
The distinction comes in
the fact that the World Economic Forum have identified 'The
Great Reset' as the one issue that can bind all these
other areas of concern together to try and bring about an economic
and societal 'new world order'.
So much so that when
announcing the initiative in June, the WEF confirmed that the reset
will be the theme of its annual
Davos meeting in Switzerland come
In previous years the WEF have only published details of an upcoming
theme a few weeks before the meeting takes place. This time,
however, they have given over six months notice, which suggests the
level of significance that the WEF have placed on 'The Great Reset'.
Having ascertained the seven main objectives and the plethora of
industries and issues tied to them, let's now get a sense of the
motivations behind the reset from those who are calling for it.
The Founder and Executive Chairman of the institution,
Klaus Schwab, and the IMF
Kristalina Georgieva, are two
of the most prominent voices.
Beginning with Schwab, in articles posted on the WEF Website (Now
is the Time for a 'Great Reset' and
COVID-19's Legacy - This is how to get the
Great Reset right) and during several interviews that can
be found on the WEF's Youtube channel,
Schwab summarizes why
he considers an economic, societal, geopolitical, environmental
and technological reset to be essential.
perspective, there are numerous reasons why a Great Reset should
be pursued, but Covid-19 is the most urgent of them all.
Not only has the
virus demonstrated that existing systems are no longer fit
for purpose, it has also,
transition into the age of the Fourth Industrial
For those unfamiliar with
the Fourth Industrial Revolution, this was a concept that the
World Economic Forum led with for their 2016 Davos meeting.
Back in 2018, I published
a brief overview of 4IR which can be found
With systems not suited to the 21st century, Schwab spoke
of the urgency to,
functioning system of smart global cooperation structured to
address the challenges of the next 50 years.'
To achieve this, all
stakeholders of global society will have to be integrated into a,
common interest, purpose and action'.
No one, it seems, is
permitted to be left behind.
We go as one, as a
collective, whether an individual likes it or not.
Every country will
need to take part.
Every industry must
This, according to
Schwab, will signify a Great Reset of capitalism and a new
era of 'prosperity'...
But what if all stakeholders don't band together behind the
In Schwab's view, to be
'will lead to more
polarization, nationalism, racism, increased social unrest and
In short, a greater level
of chaos and degradation of systems, leaving the world more fragile
and less sustainable.
Schwab has insisted that to avoid this scenario, minor changes will
foundations for our economic and social systems' must be built.
Covid-19, therefore, is
'historical moment to
shape the system for a post Corona era.'
It is an opportunity that
Schwab says must not be missed.
Schwab went further a few weeks after the Great Reset was launched.
As many are aware, using crisis as an opportunity to bring
about major economic and societal change is a notorious strategy
of global planners.
And every so often some
of those planners suggest as much.
According to Schwab,
'acute crises favor
introspection and foster the potential for transformation'.
Prince of Wales, who fully endorses
the Great Reset, said something similar in that,
shockwaves of crisis may make people more receptive to bigger
visions of change'.
This begs the question:
does the same level
of potential for change exist without the onset of crises...?
To a small extent,
perhaps, but more likely is that until a population is faced with a
threat or danger that they believe risks being detrimental to them
personally, the motivation to act and call for reform is not as
Minds need to be concentrated on the seeming disaster at hand before
sufficient support can be gained for the policies that global
And if minds can be
concentrated, then as Schwab points out,
'a new world could
emerge, the contours of which it is incumbent on us to
re-imagine and to re-draw'.
Many of the policies that
global figureheads desire are within the purview of the the Fourth
Industrial Revolution, which Schwab and his ilk have been promoting
as essential since the back end of 2015.
Now a global crisis of
sufficient magnitude has presented an opening to further the goals
of the global elite.
Did this happen by
coincidence or by design? Truthfully, no one can say for sure...
Whilst the World
Economic Forum were part of a pandemic simulation exercise
a few months before the world entered into a live pandemic, this is
not incontrovertible evidence of what some are now referring to as a
When the Great Reset agenda was unveiled, one of the other leading
proponents was IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva.
She declared it of
'paramount importance' that a future return to economic growth
must encompass a 'greener, smarter and fairer world'.
There is no need to
wait, said Georgieva. The world must act now.
One of the most important
takeaways from Georgieva's intervention was her admission that,
'the digital economy
is the big winner of this crisis'.
We have seen this already
through the exponential growth in central banks discussing the
issuance of their own
digital currencies and using
Covid-19 as a reason to reinforce calls for a new global economic
In a speech to Italy's National Consultation in June (Italy,
Europe and the Global Recovery in 2021), Georgieva said
'may have accelerated
the digital transformation by two or three years'.
The unproven fear of
cash being a 'transmitter' of the virus, along
with people relying on contactless payments and online transactions,
have no doubt contributed to her outlook.
Georgieva's focus is on 'the economy of tomorrow', which is reason
enough for her that the 'economy of yesterday' should be consigned
Entirely new foundations are required, not a rework of
the failed systems of old...
If it sounds like
Georgieva and Schwab are reading from the same script, I would
suggest that they are...
Georgieva believes that 2021 is a make or break year for the
Either the world
chooses more cooperation or more fragmentation.
According to her,
'this is the moment
to decide that history will look back on this as the Great
Reset, not the Great Reversal'.
As you might have
guessed, 'the most important anchor of recovery' is for a
Covid-19 vaccination, which
Georgieva hopes will be available at scale by 2021.
The implication is
that without a vaccine the world will be unable to return to any
sense of normality, particularly in terms of open interaction
with your fellow man.
Only with a vaccine
and supplementary treatments can there be a 'fully fledged
To support the drive for
a Great Reset, in July Klaus Schwab co-wrote a book with
Thierry Malleret (who founded the Global Risk Network at
the World Economic Forum) called 'Covid-19 - The Great Reset'.
In a follow up article I
will be looking at some aspects to the book, and also will make an
argument for why the idea of a 'Great Reversal' might not be as
detrimental to global planners as the likes of Kristalina Georgieva
Read full story
You can actually participate in the global efforts to cripple
the Deep State organized criminal
cabal's ability for genocide, while enjoying healthcare
freedom at the same time, by boycotting
Big Pharma for good...!