Hereís something I wrote to another person recently
By fall 2001 I had finished my study
of the ancient material presented by Sitchin, and in November
2001 I personally met
Zecharia Sitchin, Neil Freer,
Robert Bauval, and other well-known figures in this field at the
Connections conference in Sedona, AZ. It was then that I shifted
gears from studying the ancient stuff to linking it with the
present and with how we can free the Earth from the parasites
and set it on the right path in peace and friendship with our
brothers and sisters on other planets.
The first problem was to fill the gap
between where Sitchin ends his story of the Anunnaki (2024 BCE) and
the present. This is a gap of 4000 years. I needed to figure out
exactly when, how, and why did the Anunnaki leave the Earth, and how
did the Earth transition from overt rule by Anunnaki to present
covert rule by the
shadow government. I pondered about this question
for a few months and by May 2002 I had arrived at my present theory.
My present theory (some of it outlined in the paper I pointed you
1) is that at one time our solar system was a melting pot for
people from different stars. The Anunnaki who came here from the
10th planet of the solar system were the product of that community,
and the legacy was carried on when they created us through genetic
There was also an ancient civilization on
possibly on Venus too), although I still know too little about that.
The Moon is the oldest body in the solar system: some its rocks were
dated at 5.3 billion years, whereas the age of the Earth and the
solar system is very strongly believed to be 4.6 billion years, and
is in fact really a planet of its own (I can give you more technical
astronomical details if you want).
But then this happy community was
invaded by a galactic colonial
power seeking to complete enslave this circle of bodies, the mulmul,
our solar system as it is called in the ancient texts. This colonial
power, as Iíve explained in the paper Iíve pointed you to, is the
Judeo-Christian god. As Iíve explained there this is how the ancient
knowledge and advanced civilization were stomped into the ground and
the world was thrust into the dark ages until the Renaissance.
Here I have to acknowledge the contribution of
Robert Bauval whom I
met at the Nov 2001 Cosmic Connections conference. As this is
getting very long Iíll have to explain what it is some other time,
but his work helped me figure out one very important secret. As it
turns out, all the great medieval figures like Isaac Newton who
helped bring us the world where science has largely replaced
religion actually had strong connections with the Egyptian esoteric
mythology, and it was the latter that inspired them to come up with
Science that dares to go against the Church.
As I already explained, contrary to what weíve all been taught no
one except the Judeo-Christians has ever had a religion in the sense
of opium for the people. The ancient Sumerians,
Egyptians and others had NO dogmatic religions. Their teachings were
not ďfaithĒ but knowledge, knowledge in the scientific sense, truth
rather than dogma. Their ďgodsĒ were not really gods, they were not
some ďspiritsĒ but mundane flesh-and-blood ETs.
And the Egyptian
ďgodsĒ were the very same as the Sumerian Anunnaki, and the ancient
Egyptian esoteric texts were none other than complex scientific
knowledge of the Anunnaki. THAT was the origin of the Renaissance:
we owe our scientific knowledge of today mostly to a religious
revolution in which some dared to defect from the Catholic dogma and
convert to the Egyptian religion instead, which was not really a
religion at all but an ancient and difficult to understand system of
The reason this revelation is so important is its political
implication. Or I should say exopolitical. Just as biology is the
study of life and exobiology is the study of extraterrestrial life,
in the same way as politics is the study of power relations in and
between Earth nations, so is exopolitics the study of power
relations in outer space.
Think about it: it seems like at least at
that early stage the Yahwistsí goals were to kick the Anunnaki off
the Earth and to hold the humankind down face in the toilet.
Judeo-Christianity was very successful at that for many many
centuries. But why did they suddenly let go of the grip? Why are we
not still in Middle Ages? And the real big question is, did they let
go of the grip, or did they not?
And I believe, and this is unfortunate, that the
answer is no, they
never let go of the grip. They are still in power today. I believe
so based on what is happening in the world today, what happened
throughout the 20th century, and what happened in the centuries just
before. And this is where my Marxist background comes into play. The
theory of Marx and Engels explains how humanity has evolved from
primitive communal societies through slavery and through feudalism
to capitalism, and how capitalism is still unstable and must give
way first to socialism and then to communism.
Now Engels followed in
the steps of
Darwin and rested his theory in the hypothesis that we
emerged from savagery. I donít blame him for this because at that
time they could not know any better, but now we do. Knowledge that
DNA is a computer program resolutely disproves macroevolution, and
we have overwhelming evidence for advanced knowledge and technology
in antiquity, proving Sitchinís theory of extraterrestrial origin of
human civilization which started out advanced.
So the primitive
communal societies that Marx and Engels wrote about were not so
primitive after all. The slaveholding world order that followed is
in full agreement with my theory that we were enslaved by a colonial
galactic power, and the medieval feudalism of course had
the Catholic church at its vertex.
But what about Marxí prediction that capitalism has to give way to
socialism and communism? Marx and Engelsí reasoning was of course
based on the presumption of the humanity evolving on its own free of
external controls. Thus the agreement or disagreement of their
predictions with reality can be used to test for the presence or
absence of such external controls. In particular, it can help answer
the question of whether the Yahwist reptiles let go of their grip on
the Earth or not at the time when feudalism gave way to capitalism,
right after Renaissance.
And here is my theory of what happened
When the European thinkers
of the Renaissance rediscovered the ancient Egyptian teachings, they
associated themselves first and foremost with with the Egyptian
goddess Isis. Sitchin has shown (and I agree with his analysis) that
Isis was the great-great-granddaughter of Anunnaki leader
led a separate faction of the Anunnaki that I believe was partially
Sirian, as Enkiís mother was apparently from
Sirius (the brightest
star as seen from Earth).
In the division of the Earth between
different factions of the Anunnaki ancient Egypt always belonged to
the Enkiites. It was the latter who built the 3 great
the Giza plateau (the pharaohs tried to copy them, giving us all the
other pyramids, but none of them could ever come even close to the
three built by the ďgodsĒ themselves). And star Sirius was always
very prominent in the Egyptian esoteric tradition, which I believe
is no accident.
How is this relevant? It seems like
Isis was brave enough to make
several attempts at recovering the Earth long after it was taken
over by the Yahwists and all other
Anunnaki fled in their
spaceships. As it turns out there is a very well-known city on Earth
that still bears her name. That city is Paris. Paris was founded
around 300-200 BCE and its original Latin name is Par-Isis, the
of Isis. (This was one of the critical clues that Robert Bauvalís
lecture gave me.)
In light of this knowledge and of the fact that
France was a major
centre of the Enlightenment, coupled with some other curious facts
(e.g. that Josephine, Napoleonís wife, considered herself almost a
reincarnation of Isis, or that the French have copied many Egyptian
elements and seriously contemplated building their own stone
pyramids), a case can be made for the hypothesis that the
Enlightenment/Renaissance which significantly weakened the Catholic
church was none other than another attempt by Enkiite/Sirian
Anunnaki to take this planet back from the Yahwists (the colonial
power responsible for the Judeo-Christian opium for the people).
It looks like that attempt was a partial success and partial
failure. It wasnít entirely successful as the French Revolution was
not carried all the way to a permanent regime change to bring back
ancient Egypt under the Anunnaki. But it was a partial success in
that feudalism gave way to capitalism. Sure, capitalism is horrible,
but it is a state that does not need external control, and
furthermore wild capitalism is an unstable transition state that has
to give way to something else (Marx predicted communism, but
unfortunately that is not the only possibility as Iíll show in a
The internal contradictions of
wild capitalism led to revolutionary
situations forming in Russia and Germany, but the two countries took
drastically different paths. Why? This is where we are getting
closer to Roswell, as the hidden war between the Anunnaki and
the Yahwists took a new turn. I believe that the
Cold War was actually
that very same cosmic war, with the Soviets being on the side of
Anunnaki and the U.S. being on the side of
the post-WW2 (and post-Roswell!) American superpower is actually
nothing but a continuation of the Third Reich. And Hitler was a Jew.
This theory is based on ufology. There is plenty of evidence that
U.S. government is working with bad ETs. If you find this
difficult to swallow, read
Alien Agenda by Jim Marrs, or
Secret: The Worldwide UFO Cover-up by Timothy Good. And I believe
these bad ETs are the very same Yahwists. Aside from this being the
simplest possibility, there are two connections that point to it.
These are the penile connection and the MJ12-Christ connection.
The penile connection: it was Yahweh who first instituted penile
mutilation starting with Abraham. It is surely barbaric and causes
great harm, but it is generally considered a mark. Once when I was
explaining this to someone, I heard this objection: whatís the point
of a mark in a place that nobody sees? This was a valid objection
and I thought about it for a while, and then the answer hit me: when
you get abducted by aliens and probed, what is the very first place
where they go?
In women they seem mostly interested in getting to
the ovaries by poking through the belly button, although the vaginal
area also gets some attention, but in men they go straight to the
penis usually. Thus there is a possibility that this is indeed whom
the mark was intended to be seen by. If this is so, it obviously
points to a connection between the ancient institution of mutilation
and the present day abductions performed by aliens working together
with the U.S. government.
The MJ12-Christ connection
First if you donít know what
youíll first need to read the books I have indicated to understand
this. But basically MJ12 is a very high-ranking group controlling
US-ET relations. The smoking gun here is that one leaked government
document refers to the aliens having planted a figure on Earth about
2000 years ago which obviously implies Christ. But which aliens?
That document is certainly talking about the ones that the
government is working with. And Iíve already told you what I think
about Christ: an agent-provocateur of the colonial
Yahwist power on
a mission to stomp the humanity into darkness, which is what
There are many other clues indicating that
Judeo-Christianity, the Medieval Catholic church, the
government, and the aliens they are working with at
Area 51 are all
the same stuff. Connections have been exposed between
Italian Mafia, and U.S. CIA. The Judeo-Christian dogma is more
prevalent in this country than anywhere else in the world. And
finally, as I just learned fairly recently, most men of my age or
older in this country are mutilated! I am really fortunate to be
Russian and thank the Communist Soviet government for my intact
But letís look on the other side of the Berlin wall. What evidence
do we have that the Soviets were indeed on the side of the Anunnaki?
Before we go to the Soviet Union, letís look at ancient Russia.
Tracing pagan religions (i.e. Anunnaki-run societies) and their
clash with Judeo-Christianity throughout the world reveals that not
only were the ancient Russian pagan gods the very same Anunnaki, but
ancient Russia was their very last place on Earth after the Yahwists
had kicked them out of everywhere else.
I have long suspected that the
USSR was in fact a continuation of
ancient Russia. (By ancient Russia I mean pre-czar, as the czar was
clearly subservient to the Christian god and hence an enemy.) My
suspicions were confirmed when my dad told me the theory that
Stalinís father was a knyaz. Knyazi were the olden Russian nobility
stemming from pre-czarist ancient Russia. Other clues that the USSR
was a bone in the throat for our extraterrestrial
enemies and most
probably allied with the Anunnaki have to do with the way it
collapsed. This is something that happened when I still lived there
and can tell you the story firsthand.
Shortly after USSR was publicly declared history in 1991 a small
group of old leaders tried to restore it with the famous coup (putch)
in which Gorbachev was held under house arrest at his dacha in
Faros. I was there as that story unfolded and saw it all happen. And
the thing that turned me on end was how when it was all over they
asked Gorbachev on TV what happened there and among his reply there
was this phrase ďwell, I will never tell you everythingĒ (exact
words, my translation).
This phrase made a lasting impression on me.
I couldnít make out exactly what it was, but I had this definite
feeling that whatever he was not talking about was something of
paramount importance to humanity, on par with the Great Pyramids.
While at that time I thought too little about ufology, as I learned
more about the latter and started thinking more, the more I think
about it, the more it seems to me that whatever Gorbachev was not
telling us was something ufological and something going to the core
of the matter, why the Soviet Union collapsed, what was the coup
really about, etc.
The other smoking gun is Chernobyl. Recently one of my comrades who
lives in ex-USSR and who is a good engineer pointed me to an article
(I can give you the link, but itís in Russian) explaining in great
detail what happened there. The article was written shortly after
the disaster by one of the leading Soviet nuclear engineers who was
one of the original designers of that power plant, and it was very
It was not atoms, and it was not bad Soviet technology
that caused that disaster. It was the people, the powers that were.
It was as if reactor unit #4 was meant to blow up. All actions of
the personnel were, it seems like, purposely intended to cause the
disaster. Had the personnel done anything differently there would
have been no disaster. Itís a VERY long article and lists tons of
hair-raising things that happened there, but here is just one for
you to ponder over.
The reactor has a system called
SAOR. It stands for sistema
avarijnogo ohlazhdeniya reaktora, reactor emergency cooling system.
It is a system precisely designed for preventing meltdowns, and a
meltdown is what quickly led to the explosion at Chernobyl. Nuclear
reactions always release heat. Lots of it. Itís just physics and
there is no way to stop it. In normally operation this heat produces
steam that rotates the turbines of generators, giving us
electricity. But in case of an emergency situation there must still
always be something else to cool the reactor, and this is what
is for. SAOR consists of reservoirs of cold water and independent
pumps for pouring that water into the reactor.
Reactor unit #4 at the Chernobyl nuclear powerplant blew up when the
personnel performed a very risky experiment on it. In fact the
experiment was so suicidally risky that it is an enigma how someone
could have designed such an experiment and why none of the several
mandatory approval agencies screamed on and instead silently
The experiment was kind of like jumping out of a plane
without a parachute just to test whether one can survive such a fall
or not. Basically they deliberately put the reactor into an
unfavorable mode of operation to test the safety of the powerplant.
Kind of like testing your safety against electrocution by touching a
live 10 kV wire and seeing if you get killed or not. But Iím
So get this: prior to the experiment they shut off the valve of the
SAOR system and to prevent the possibility of anyone turning it back
on, they chained it up and padlocked it. Iím not making this up:
itís a well-documented fact. They all later openly confessed to it,
and I think the recovery teams after the disaster even saw the valve
in that state. Now what do you make of this?
Actually the reactor design was not that bad after all and there
were many other safety mechanisms. But they were all deliberately
defeated in a similar manner. So had they done JUST ONE THING
differently, anything, there would have been no disaster.
After I was done reading that I could only think that those who
basically deliberately blew up the reactor acted under some sort of
hypnosis. (While that is a whole different subject, I do know quite
a bit about parapsychology, and I can personally testify that it
works. Iíve seen people do it and Iíve ever done it myself.) And
then a few months ago I read that someone saw a UFO hovering over
the powerplant that fateful night...
The Chernobyl disaster certainly played a major role in the collapse
of the Soviet Union, and the way it happened definitely indicates
that some extremely powerful entity wanted the USSR brought down.
But what made my hair stand on end was one thing that the author of
the article mentioned. As Iíve said he was one of the original
designers of that powerplant. When he first came to the site where
the powerplant was being built, he rode a taxi, and as they drove,
they talked about the area and its beauty, etc. And the driver
reminded him that it was the most ancient land, the place where
knyaz Svyatoslav was choosing his bride.
That was almost unbelievable. The heart of ancient Russia,
the Anunnakiís last place on Earth, was none other than
the RBMK reactor used at that powerplant was not the best reactor
design in the world and some of its flaws played a role in the
disaster, but there were many, many RBMK reactors in the Soviet
Union, and none of the others blew up.
Why did they blow up that one
specifically? Was it just a coincidence that they chose to blow up
the reactor located precisely at the site of the Anunnakiís last
place on Earth, to poison the place with radiation and prevent them
from coming back there? I donít believe in coincidence any more.
Nothing is planned more carefully than an accident.
So this is my theory of who were
the good guys and the bad guys, in
human history and in outer space around us. The bad guys are still
in control, but there have been several attempts by the good guys to
defeat them and to bring back the free peaceful Earth and solar
system, the USSR being the last such attempt.
And I want to fight for our planet and our human race. I wonít be
led to the slaughter house without a fight. I am an engineer and I
believe we can create technology to defeat the dark empire. And we
most certainly have friends and allies on other planets whom we just
fight together with. The reason I have spent so much effort to
recreate a clear picture of history and to determine who is who is
to know whom to contact with alliance proposals and whom to shoot.
To know where the enemies have their bases which we must attack and
where are the good guys located and hence where we can fly for help.
And I am working on means of communication. (With the Anunnaki and
other potential allies.)
Here is some more stuff I wrote in other old E-mails a few
David Ickeís section.
The most shocking piece of truth is
The Reptilian Connection.
But just like
Zecharia Sitchin, Neil Freer, Al Alford,
and others, David in his search for the Truth has missed one vitally
important secret, what I would call the greatest Secret of Secrets,
one that goes beyond all the great secrets those diligent
researchers have uncovered, one without which one will never know
the real Truth.
There was not one but TWO different extraterrestrial forces
have controlled this planet and our existence on it. The first was
the Anunnaki, Those Who from Heaven to Earth Came in
came here about 450.000 years ago at which time the evolution on
Earth was at the stage of the hominid ape. The inexplicable jump
from the hominid ape to Homo Sapiens (ďthe missing linkĒ) was the
result of a genetic engineering effort by Anunnaki leaders
Ninmah/Ninti (later called Ninharsag).
They are our creators, as
documented in the
Sumerian Atra-Hasis text. There is even a
depiction of Ninmah holding baby Adam as she exclaims ďI have
created! My hands have made it!Ē while Enki stands nearby working
with flasks and test tubes. The ancient texts say this happened
around 250.000 years ago, just as the modern anthropologists have
Thoth, Enki and
Ninmah with the first hybrid Anunnaki/Homo Erectus
Sumerian cylinder seal (from Sitchin, Z., 1995, Divine
Encounters, page 13)
Around 3800 BC the Anunnaki gave humans
civilization (ďKingship was
lowered from HeavenĒ) and the first human civilization, Sumer in
Mesopotamia, the land between two rivers, today Iraq, appeared. It
was then that all this was written down for posterity on clay
tablets that have been undug there over the past 150 years. The
Anunnaki were the ďgodsĒ of that civilization and all ancient world.
The Anunnaki divided into two clans led by half-brothers and
political rivals Enki and Enlil, sons of Anu, the king of their home
planet, which is the
tenth planet of our solar system (Ninmah/Ninti/Ninharsag
was a half-sister to both of them). Early on in their Earth mission
(before the creation of man) they divided the Earth between them.
Enlil took over the E.DIN (the Biblical Eden), their original base
in the ancient Near East, while Enki went down to Africa to hold
dominion over that entire continent. In time Enki established Egypt
as his primary domain. Enkiís clan was often referred to as serpentine (thatís what
David Icke is talking about when he mentions
ancient references to a ďserpent raceĒ).
Despite the serpentine references (which were specific to
clan), the Anunnaki (all of them) certainly did not look reptilian.
They looked like us, and that is simply because when they created us
they made us look like them. (Thatís where the Biblical Elohim
(plural) say ďlet us create Adam in our image, after our likeness.Ē)
They were so much like humans that they were sexually compatible
with humans and very lovely.
This certainly does not suggest
dragon-like reptilian beings: Anunnaki ladies (ďgoddessesĒ) were
very beautiful and having sex with a goddess was the greatest honor
an ancient man (king or noble) could get, and I for one definitely
would not want to mate with a reptile. The main physical difference
between us and the Anunnaki seems to be their height. They were
referred to as the ďlofty onesĒ (ilu in
Akkadian, which when
mistranslated as ďgodsĒ gave rise to the notion of religion,
previously non-existent), and there are many ancient depictions of
groups of people led by a leader much taller than his followers.
Some sources suggest that they were as
tall as 4.5 m (14-15 ft).
The Sumerian texts leave no doubt as to the genealogy of the
Anunnaki leaders. Enlil was king Anuís legal heir because he was
born to him by his official wife queen Antu, who was also his
half-sister. However, he was not the firstborn. The firstborn was
Ea/Enki, born to Anu by a concubine.
Ninmah was born to him by
another concubine, thus becoming a half-sister to both Enki and
Enlil. While Ea was Anuís only son, he was growing up thinking that
he would be the heir as the firstborn, and then suddenly out of Antuís womb comes Enlil to challenge him and become the new legal
heir due to his mother being Anuís official wife and half-sister. It
is no wonder then why they were political rivals for the rest of
This sheds some light on why Enkiís clan may have been
as serpentine. The ancient texts undug so far provide no information
about Enkiís mother. It is entirely possible that she was from a
different starsystem than Anu. (Those people were certainly capable
of interstellar travel.) There is evidence that this is indeed the
case. One self-proclaimed channeler claims (I normally donít
consider information from such dubious sources, but in this case it
corroborates other evidence) that
her name was Isis and she came
from Sirius with some Orion connections. This warrants further
Isis is the name of a well-known Egyptian goddess. But few people
know that this is not how the Egyptians called her. They called her
Ast or Asta, which was most likely her real name, and
Isis was the
Greek version. Yet the rest of the world knows her as Isis. The
Egyptian Isis was the great-granddaughter of Ra and the sister-wife
of Osiris. Ra was the firstborn son of Enki, which makes the
Egyptian Isis Enkiís great-great-granddaughter, rather than his
Yet people often name their children after their ancestors. What if
there was Isis Sr., Enkiís mother, and Isis Jr., his
great-great-granddaughter, the Egyptian Isis? If this is so, in the
case of Isis Sr. Isis is probably also a nickname, rather than the
real name. What was her real original name? I believe it was AS-T.
There is one source that indicates that Anuís real name was
(which agrees with the Sumerian data), that Anu was derived from
AN-U, that his wife queen Antu was actually AN-T, and that the lady
known as Ninmah, Ninti, or Ninharsag was named at birth
name SEN-T doesnít appear in any Sumerian texts to my knowledge, but
it is more likely to be her original name than any of her Sumerian
names. Her earliest name on Earth was NIN.MAH, ďGreat LadyĒ or
ďExalted LadyĒ, and this sounds like a complimentary title. She was
indeed very attractive when she was young, and highly desired by
both Enki and Enlil.)
The apparent grammatical structure of their
male and female names suggests AS-T as the most likely original name
from which Ast or Asta was derived in Egypt.
The Egyptians associated their
Isis with the
star Sirius. The
evidence thus comes full circle: it appears that one of ANís
concubines who was Enkiís mother was named AS-T and that
from Sirius. It seems that AS-T is also how the star itself is
called by the star people. (From my limited knowledge of how the
star people call their stars, the name AS-T sounds plausible.)
But what about the reptilian connection? How does this make
clan serpentine? I may have the answer to this question. The same
source that talks about AN fathering EA/EN-KI, AN-EN/EN-LIL, and
also talks about an elder star race called ARI-AN. They are
reportedly tall and referred to as reptile men. They are mentioned
in passing as having had some involvement in Earth affairs, although
it was apparently limited.
I have long been wondering who were the
ARI-AN until one day the etymology struck me that
awfully like Orion. Now remember that the same channeler who claimed
that Enkiís mother was from Sirius also claimed that she had some
Orion connections. Could it be that she had some ARI-AN genes?
If this is so and if ARI-AN is indeed
Orion, the evidence again
comes full circle. Enkiís clan then got its serpentine genes from ARI-AN through Sirius and AS-T. This would also explain why the
Egyptians considered constellation Orion so important. (The three
great pyramids on the Giza plateau are located exactly in the same
arrangement as the three stars of Orionís belt, Zeta Orionis,
Epsilon Orionis, and Delta Orionis, appear in the sky.)
This is where one should ask: how could they have
and yet look the same as, be fully sexually compatible with, and be
just as attractive as the other Anunnaki who presumably did not have
such reptilian genes, and us humans?
Biology and evolution come as our answer
The same source that talks
about the ARI-AN says that those
reptilian beings who are highly
evolved no longer look like reptiles but look more like us. This was
apparently the case with the ARI-AN. Such evolution is not without
precedent on Earth. I believe the dinosaurs were warm-blooded, and
thus were closer to birds than reptiles.
I believe so because the
dinosaurs were very strong and some could even fly, and such
strength requires the metabolism of a warm-blooded organism. (Flight
requires immense strength. If a man had wings, he would have to be
70 times stronger than he is in order to fly.)
Thus it appears that the ďserpentineĒ
Anunnaki of Enkiís clan were
not physically reptilian as David Icke seems to think, instead they
looked just like us as Iíve already said, but had some reptilian
elements inside, which we all probably do.
But aside from biology and genetics, what kind of people were they?
Were they good or bad? All evidence points that Enki and his
children were the humanityís greatest benefactors ever. (This is
getting very long, so Iíll save the details for another time.) And
Enkiís great-great-granddaughter Isis Jr. appears to have been the
humanityís Lightgiver, and one brave enough to have continued to
play this role long after the rest of the Anunnaki have been kicked
off the Earth (see below).
She founded the city of Paris, often
called the City of Light, and gave it her name: its original Latin
name is Par-Isis. I believe she led Joan díArc, the French
enlighteners, the other carriers of light and knowledge of the
Renaissance, and the Russian revolutionaries-liberators (more about
this later). There are even some hints that she was the prototype of
Jesus Christ, and the name Jesus was a pun on Isis.
The story of the Anunnaki from about 450.000 years ago to 2024 BC is
related very well with overwhelming supporting evidence in the works
Zecharia Sitchin, a lifelong researcher of ancient history and
one of about 200 people in the world who can read the Sumerian
language, the oldest language on Earth.
Sitchin did not invent this
story as a tale of fiction, he merely relates to the rest of us who
canít easily read the ancient languages what has been passed to us
in the ancient writings from all over the world, primarily
Mesopotamia, Canaan, Egypt, and
ancient America. The ancient texts
he quotes are really ancient texts, not his own writings, and
doubters can go to the British Museum, the Louvre, Hermitage, and
other major museums to verify that those ancient texts are real.
The problem with Sitchin is that he fails to address
outside the abovementioned time period. He does not attempt to find
the origin of the Anunnaki before they came to Earth, which I
believe is necessary in order to truly understand who they were and
how this meshes in with the ancient Martian civilization and
ancient Moon. Even more seriously Sitchin conceals what I consider
the Secret of Secrets which goes beyond the secrets uncovered about
the Anunnaki: after the Anunnaki another alien race came to Earth,
kicked the Anunnaki out, and they are the ones who covertly rule the
entire Earth today.
At the same time when Sumer was laid waste by the deadly radioactive
cloud brought eastward by the wind from the Sinai Peninsula where
two hot-nerved Anunnaki leaders nuked their own spaceport (Sodom,
Gomorrah, and a few other cities were nuked at the same time with
all their innocent residents simply because the war-makers were
thinking their enemy was hiding there), something weird happened
with a Sumerian man named AB.RAM: some ďgodĒ came to him and told
him to mutilate his penis and do the same to all his children and
Then some six centuries later those descendants come
out of Egypt into their ďpromised landĒ displacing, enslaving, or
killing its innocent indigenous dwellers, barbarously sacking
marvelous cities, and creating the state of Israel.
Who was the ďGodĒ of
Israel (whom they called
in Latin and English) who should be held responsible for all those
atrocities? All evidence points that he could not have been any of
the Anunnaki. Moreover, this evidence points that he was very
different from the humanoid beings (us, Anunnaki, Sirians, ARI-AN,
and others) and instead was something extremely ugly and evil, a
monster of the kind we try to picture in horror movies.
So it was
the Yahwists who have replaced the Anunnaki. The same
source that talks about AN and ARI-AN calls them lizards or small
reptiles. They are the ones who are in power today. Their greatest
power is that of disguise, which is why they are mostly unknown even
to those highly involved in these subjects.
They falsified the Bible
to attribute to Yahweh all the creation acts done by the Anunnaki.
They fabricated the Quíran to cloud the minds of the followers of
Allah, who is really El/Sin/Nannar, one of the Anunnaki, and make
him into another Yahweh like he is in todayís Islam.
They took over
the Anunnaki command center on Mount Moriah (ďThe Mount of
DirectingĒ - image right) in Ur-Shalem (Jerusalem) with its interplanetary
communication equipment. The fact that this place today is the most
restricted place in the world and the prize over which wars are
fought in the Middle East without end strongly suggests that some
millennia-old equipment may still be operating there today.
It is this stealth takeover of
Anunnaki power, status, and
facilities by another alien race that has caused everyone I know of
who has tried to solve this jigsaw puzzle to come up with wrong
answers. It was Sitchin who brought the truth about the Anunnaki to
the populace, and he is wildly popular. His books have been
translated into 14 languages and sold millions of copies. While
originally he was my hero, I now question his real agenda and the
effect of his works on the peopleís knowledge of the truth.
Given how much research he has done in this area and how many people
have approached him with suggestions to refine his theory (which he
has consistently brushed off), there is no way he can be unaware of
the reality of the Yahwist reptiles. So essentially he knows the
truth but refuses to talk about it. By ending his story in 2024 BC
he leaves his readers to guess what happened in the remaining 4000
years from then till now. And his readers unaware of the so
well-hidden secret reptilian power have all come up with their own
Neil Freer, a pie-in-the-sky idealist who sees the people of the
Earth as perfectly informed and free-willed, a sort of united
family, builds a theory that Anunnaki left the Earth in 1250 BC
(even Sitchin, who rarely goes past his 2024 BC mark, shows one
instance of leader Sin having some business on Earth in the city of
Harran in 555 BC) and theorizes how the humans left all on their own
slowly enlightened themselves. Wrong!
Not once from the moment of
our creation have people ever been free. Weíve been property from
our creation through today continuously without lapse, itís just
that our ownership changed hands from the Anunnaki to the Yahwist
Conspiracy researcher and author
Jim Marrs, who is very familiar
with Sitchinís work, has like myself come to question Sitchinís true
agenda. Yet when I met him and talked to him about this, he was
unaware of extraterrestrial influences other than the Anunnaki and
he built his theory that the Anunnaki were the sinister reptiles who
went into hiding and rule the Earth secretly today.
David Icke seems
to be of the same line of thought, apparently having equated the
ancient ďserpent raceĒ and todayís Yahwists lizards and probably
having missed the fact that not all Anunnaki were the ďserpent
raceĒ, only Enkiís clan, and the latter were actually the humanityís
greatest benefactors. The serpents and the lizards
are two very
different reptilian races! Even in simple mundane biology serpents
and lizards are quite different species.
I have thus realized that I have almost accidentally made a major
discovery. I have realized a fact without knowing which oneís
understanding of our true history and present reality is impossible.
Without realizing that there have been TWO very different
extraterrestrial forces involved in our history, one is bound to
come to totally wrong conclusions, either to live in a
pie-in-the-sky illusion or to blame our problems on someone who is
not to blame.
Thus I believe I have a duty to the humanity to expose this truth.
This is why I am writing a book about this. In my book I will
explain all this in detail, slowly and sequentially in a way that
can be understood by someone completely new to all this overwhelming
Go Back to Contents
Go to Part 3