|
by Patrick Wood
July 23, 2025
from
Technocracy Website
Omar Marques/SOPA Images
LightRocket/CHARLY
TRIBALLEAU
AFP
The White House has just released its official policy document,
America's A.I. Action Plan,
defining the future of A.I. development.
Admittedly,
Trump doesn't have any real
understanding of A.I., but he has totally caved in to the
Technocrats he appointed in the first place.
Indeed, Technocracy is being forced down our
throats whether we want it or not...
Coordinated with the release of the Plan, the
A.I..GOV website was just launched.
The first pillar of America's A.I.
Action Plan focuses on removing regulatory barriers and
eliminating unnecessary review processes.
Superficially, this appears as a push against
bureaucratic inertia, but in reality, it amounts to an explicit
transfer of authority from elected bodies to expert committees
and interagency working groups.
The second pillar includes a comprehensive scheme for A.I.
literacy and workforce retraining.
At first glance, investment in skill
development and rapid-response training may appear benevolent.
Yet the Plan prescribes a narrowly defined
set of competencies - data labeling, model auditing, grid
operations - determined by federal projections of industrial
demand.
Such top-down workforce engineering tracks
precisely with technocratic ideology, which regards citizens as
variables in an optimization problem.
Rather than empowering individuals to shape
their own vocational paths, the Plan channels labor into
predetermined slots within a digital economy overseen by
experts.
The third pillar of the report extends the domestic
technocratic agent to the world.
By exporting American A.I. frameworks,
hardware standards, and regulatory templates to allies, the Plan
seeks to cement a global regime of expert rule.
Biosecurity on Steroids
The last item on the last page of the Plan contains real paydirt
for
Technocracy and
Transhumanism:
A.I. will unlock nearly limitless potential
in biology: cures for new diseases, novel industrial use cases,
and more.
At the same time, it could create new
pathways for malicious actors to synthesize harmful pathogens
and other biomolecules.
The solution to this problem is a
multi-tiered approach designed to screen for malicious actors,
along with new tools and infrastructure for more effective
screening. [Remember 'nose swabs for COVID screening'...? - Ed.]
As these tools, policies, and enforcement
mechanisms mature, it will be essential to work with allies and
partners to ensure international adoption.
Recommended Policy Actions
-
Require all institutions receiving
Federal funding for scientific research to use nucleic acid
synthesis tools and synthesis providers that have robust
nucleic acid sequence screening and customer verification
procedures. Create enforcement mechanisms for this
requirement rather than relying on voluntary attestation.
-
Led by OSTP, convene government and
industry actors to develop a mechanism to facilitate data
sharing between nucleic acid synthesis providers to screen
for potentially fraudulent or malicious customers.
-
Build, maintain, and update as necessary
national security-related A.I. evaluations through
collaboration between CAISI at DOC, national security
agencies, and relevant research institutions.
Therefore, DNA screening will
become commonplace across government agencies.
Who wrote this
Technocratic Screed, anyway?
Not surprisingly, the report's lead authors are listed as Michael
Kratsios and David Sacks, with Secretary of State
Marco Rubio included as an official with clout.
Michael Kratsios,
Technocrat
Currently,
Kratsios is listed as Assistant to the President
for Science and Technology.
In the first Trump Administration, he served
as the Chief Technology Officer (CTO). Appointed in
August 2019 at age 33, he was the youngest person ever to hold
the federal CTO position.
In this role, he led the White House Office of Science and
Technology Policy's efforts to advance emerging technologies -
most notably artificial intelligence (A.I.),
5G wireless networks,
quantum computing, and
data privacy - across the federal government.
He coordinated interagency A.I. initiatives,
helped develop the American A.I. Initiative, and convened
industry, academic, and civil-society stakeholders to guide
national technology policy.
David O. Sacks, Technocrat
Sacks is listed as Special Advisor for A.I. and Crypto.
He was a co-founder and the first Chief
Operating Officer (COO) of PayPal, alongside Peter Thiel and
Elon Musk. As such he was a prominent member of the so-called "PayPal
Mafia."
He is heavily invested in the A.I. industry
through his company,
Craft Ventures.
Sacks' authority is questionable.
He was originally listed as a "Special
Advisor to the President" under a protocol that ran for 133
days, which has long expired.
On this report, his title has changed to
"Special Advisor for A.I. and Crypto."
I conducted an exhaustive search to determine
that David Sacks has no current position with any government
entity and is, therefore, a private citizen.
So, what is his name doing on this report...?
Apparently, Sacks is self-appointed to be the "Crypto and A.I.
Czar".
Yes, self-appointed...
Today's arch-Technocrats are so sure of
themselves that they don't need official appointment to assert
themselves.
Video
|
