|
by Brandon Smith
Reviewed by Peter Reagan
August 06, 2025
from
BirchGold-BrandonSmith Website
As
the Covid hysteria subsided,
the global
financial elite realized
they
needed a new delivery mechanism
for their
authoritarian message.
Brandon
Smith of Alt-Market.us
connects
the dots between
inclusive
capitalism, ESG and
the
ultimate goal of
total
economic enslavement...
In July of last year as the hype surrounding the Covid pandemic was
finally dying out, I came across a video promoting a barely
publicized project called the "Council
for Inclusive Capitalism - CIC".
The group, headed by Lynn Forester de
Rothschild, is the culmination of decades of various globalist
agendas combined to represent the ultimate proof of conspiracy.
Remember when people used to say that global governance by elitists
was a paranoid fantasy?
Well, now it is openly admitted reality...!
The CIC is intimately tied to institutions like,
...but it is primarily an attempt to link all
these organizations more closely to the corporate world in an open
display of cooperation. 1
The group pushes the spread of what they call "Stakeholder
Capitalism."
This is the notion that international
corporations are obligated to engage in social engineering.
That's another way of saying that
corporations are required to manipulate citizens and governments
with economic punishments and rewards.
We witnessed this agenda in action during the
Covid lockdowns and the rush to enforce vaccine passports.
These efforts would not have been possible
without the cooperation of major corporate chains working
hand-in-hand with national governments. Luckily, the strategy failed
as local governments and the public fought back.
We have also seen stakeholder capitalism on display in the push for
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
guidelines among major companies.
Most readers are probably familiar with ESG at
this point, but keep in mind, the public was oblivious to the
terminology until the past 2 years. Globalists have been developing
ESG rules since 2005. 2
As
Klaus Schwab of the WEF notes
in his book
Stakeholder Capitalism:
The most important characteristic of the
stakeholder model today is that the stakes of our system are now
more clearly global.
Economies, societies, and the environment are
more closely linked to each other now than 50 years ago. The
model we present here is therefore fundamentally global in
nature, and the two primary stakeholders are as well.
...What was once seen as externalities in national economic
policy making and individual corporate decision making will now
need to be incorporated or internalized in the operations of
every government, company, community, and individual.
The planet is thus the center of the
global economic system, and its health should be
optimized in the decisions made by all other stakeholders.
The Carrot and the Stick
ESG was intended to be the tool that globalists and governments
would use to force companies into the stakeholder capitalism model.
It is a kind of social credit system,
but for companies.
The higher a company's ESG score, the more
access to capital and lending they would have (easy money).
Modern ESG started out in 2005, initially focused
on climate controls - influencing corporations to participate in the
carbon credit marketplace or face additional taxation.
But, by 2016 it became something else.
ESG widely adopted woke politics
including Critical Race Theory, feminism, trans ideology,
various elements of Marxism, etc.
This was the modern ESG that all of us are aware
of today.
It was an attempt to incentivize the business
world to bombard the populace with woke messaging 24/7, and it
worked, for a little while anyway.
The exposure of ESG is perhaps one of the greatest triumphs of the
alternative media.
It was proof that the "woke-ification" of our
economy and society was not the result of some grassroots activist
movement or the natural evolution of civilization.
No, everything woke was a
product, forced into existence by corporate and globalist
interests.
It is with some disappointment I'm sure that
Lynn Forester de Rothschild admitted the defeat of ESG at the
B20 Summit in India recently.
Though, as is usually the case, Rothschild admits
that the goal will be to replace the term "ESG" with something else
that the public is not as privy to while continuing to institute
social credit scoring for companies as a means to
dominate them.
It is typical for globalists to re-brand
their projects whenever they get exposed.
It's merely a way to throw the public off the
scent.
However, I don't think this tactic is going to
work anymore.
Researchers are locked on to the ESG dynamic and
changing the name will not help the establishment avoid scrutiny.
Globalists go on the Defensive
I want to point out here that there has been a dramatic shift in
globalist circles towards a defensive posture, rather than the
offensive posture they held a couple years ago.
Apparently, something went very wrong for
them
during Covid.
They were brazen with their rhetoric not long
ago, basically admitting their intentions to establish a
global authoritarian system.
Now they are sheepish and much more careful
in the things they say...
To this end, most of the honest discussion on
globalism is no longer found in the statements of
the WEF or the halls of
the Davos forums.
Rather,
the true agenda is discussed at
less prominent climate change events such as B20 in India or the
Summit for a New Global Financing Pact in Paris which I covered
in July.
These are the events where globalists now feel
increasingly free to talk about what they really want.
Another admission by Rothschild at B20 should be noted as she
suggests that Biden's "Inflation
Reduction Act" is one of the best representations of
incentivizing climate controls...
This just confirms what we already suspected:
the Inflation Reduction Act had nothing to do
with inflation.
Rather, it was a way to divert taxpayer funds
into government subsidies for carbon taxation and green tech.
Taking money out of your pocket and handing
it over to corporations who toe the ESG line.
The CIC wants to dictate global mandates that
force companies to adopt ESG-like policies using trillions of
dollars in climate funds ($7 trillion per year, to be exact).
Think of it this way:
-
Any company that "volunteers" to use less
efficient green tech and to promote climate ideology gets
access to government funds - they get rewarded.
-
Any company that refuses to go along with
the plan will ultimately face heavy taxation while trying to
compete with their subsidized peers - they are forced out of
business.
Sound familiar? It's not your imagination...
This is, essentially, the early stages of a global
communist/collectivist economic regime.
"Inclusive
Capitalism" is a Hoax
And here we get to the crux of the issue.
There is no "inclusive capitalism."
There is no "stakeholder capitalism."
There is no "ESG."
Climate change is not an existential threat.
Covid was never as severe as they wanted you to think.
What do these things have in common?
All of these issues represent smoke and
mirrors, a way to distract the populace from the root intent
to create total centralization in the hands of a select few elites.
The prize for them is to convince the public to embrace economic
micromanagement.
This is what ESG was all about.
This is what Inclusive Capitalism
is all about.
The globalists want to hand-pick winners and
losers.
Worse still, they want to use your money to
reward the faithful and punish the skeptical.
Their goal is to build a global economic
panopticon, an unescapable prison where every transaction is
monitored, evaluated, authorized or denied and (of course)
recorded.
A central bank digital currency (CDBC)
is a crucial milestone in their progress toward this goal.
Just imagine how much easier this will be
when the 100 or so largest, most influential corporations in the
world are on-board and enthusiastic about such a development...
I wrote about this not long ago:
All privacy in trade will be gone, except for
those people engaging in barter, black markets and
commodity-based transactions.
This is one of the main reasons global
central banks have persistently killed the idea of
intrinsically-sound money, like
physical gold and silver, for
the last 50 years.
Remember, barter and black markets are more
or less by definition off the books. Untaxed, unregulated and
untrackable.
But don't be misled - this is much more than an issue of
privacy.
Implementation of CBDCs would also mean that ownership of money
and the ability to transact, to participate in the economy, will
become privileges, not rights.
In communist China, use of digital payments is tied to a social
credit system.
Want access to your checking and savings
accounts? Better not say anything critical of the Party, or you
could be reported by a neighbor (or a stranger) using the
tattletale function on their smartphone. Digital money can
disappear in seconds.
Want your money back? Prove that you are
"loyal" to the Party.
There are many subtle levels between
"upstanding citizen" and "outlaw," though, and the CCP adjust
their citizens' financial statuses constantly.
Bad social credit might mean taxis won't even
stop for you. That you're prevented from purchasing from upscale
shops. (Insufficiently healthy? Your e-yuan won't even let you
buy junk food at 7-11. Seriously!)
The citizen is guilty until proven innocent.
Once the economy is locked into an ideological
prison and access to private trade can be denied by a handful of
bureaucrats working with corporations, the establishment then has
the means to dictate all of society.
Our behaviors, our beliefs, our principles, our morals.
For if the government has the power to determine whether you and
your family eat or starve, they have the power to compel you to do
anything.
This is why owning untraceable, intrinsically valuable
physical precious metals is crucial
to your own personal liberty.
Today, now, while you still can, diversify your
savings with an alternative form of money that will always be
accepted, without question, anywhere in the world.
There's a reason the globalists hate gold and silver.
They're virtually the only financial assets you
can own that are "off the books." Just as untrackable as cash (they
hate cash, too, but not as much) and, better yet, uninflatable,
unhackable and free from central bank meddling.
Fight the globalist agenda every step of the way. And make sure
that, no matter what, you and your loved ones can endure their
tyranny without compromising your beliefs.
Sources
-
"Strengthening
UN-IFI Collaboration" - NYU Center on
International Cooperation.
-
"Environmental,
Social, and Governance Investing - A Primer for Central
Banks & Reserve Managers." The World Bank.
|
