| 
			  
			
			
 
  by Richard Enos
 October 12, 
			2018
 from 
			Collective-Evolution Website
 
			
			Italian 
			version
 
 
			  
			  
			
			 
			  
				
					
						
							
							In Brief
 The Facts:
 There is a growing consensus amongst long-time 
								alternative news commentators that military 
								tribunals for 
							
							Deep State criminals will be 
								convened soon.
 
							Reflect On:
 How would our lives change if the Deep State was 
								defeated? Do we still have important work to do 
								rather than just waiting for it to happen?
 
			
 There is a growing consensus in the narrative within the alternative 
			news community (commentators, their insiders, and members in 
			general) that has become too big, too coherent to ignore.
 
			  
			Even among the more 
			skeptical of the commentators who have long bemoaned that real 
			tangible action of disclosure and legal proceedings seems to be 
			taking forever, there is now a real optimism, even a certainty among 
			several, that this time things will be different.
 The broad strokes of the narrative go as follows:
 
				
				Donald Trump was 
				originally asked by a military and political Alliance of 
				patriots to run for office, and the election of Donald Trump in 
				2016 represented the triumph of this Alliance over the Deep 
				State and their chosen candidate
				
				Hillary Clinton.    
				Trump ran on an 
				anti-establishment platform that resonated with awakening voters 
				as Trump promised to 'drain the swamp' - essentially indicating 
				that crimes that were being committed against the American 
				people would be brought to light and the Deep State insiders 
				perpetrating them would be brought to justice. 
			Since 
			
			Donald Trump took 
			office, the Alliance has been working meticulously to convene secret 
			Grand Juries to indict Deep State criminals, keeping the indictments 
			sealed until everything lines up to enable them to make mass arrests 
			and begin military tribunals.  
			  
			The confirmation of 
			Justice Kavanaugh seems to pave the way for legal support 
			from the Supreme Court, as needed, to authorize actions that will 
			get the ball rolling such as the release of unredacted FISA 
			Documents which will lay bare the complicity of key players 
			gumming up the works such as US Deputy Attorney General Rod 
			Rosenstein, which will lead to their removal from power and 
			finally 
			end Deep State obfuscation.
 
			  
			  
			  
			What The Commentators 
			Are Saying
 There are many commentators in the alternative news community who 
			have been at this game for a long time, and to be at this game for a 
			long time, one needs to be in the habit of being circumspect and 
			objective when it comes to making unverifiable claims about actions 
			that will soon come to pass.
 
			  
			There is a sense, though, 
			within the community, that insider testimony, outside evidence, and 
			the sometimes cryptic political maneuvers and messages that are now 
			taking place on a regular basis are all converging into the 
			narrative described above, such that it is no longer a question of 
			if the Deep State will be removed from power, but when.
 The similarity of opinion is striking, as you will see from the 
			small handful of comments below that I've grabbed from some recent 
			posts and videos:
 
				
				'You're going to see 
				arrests, and you're going to see indictments, and then you're 
				gonna see convictions, and some of them will spend the next 10 
				years just going from their cell to the courtroom, before 
				they're even tried and convicted, which they will be.  
				  
				They are 
				scared to death.' 
				
				
				John B. Wells 
				
 'The prosecution of these criminals is set to finally start now 
				that the U.S. military government backing President Donald Trump 
				has secured a majority on the Supreme Court with 
				
				the 
				confirmation of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Pentagon sources say.
 
					
					"Attorney General 
					Jeff Sessions has already met with the real special 
					prosecutor, U.S. Attorney John Huber in Utah, so that the 
					57,000 indictments may be unsealed," the sources explain.
					   
					"The seating of 
					Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court should unleash 
					declassification of FISA and other documents as well as 
					military tribunals," the sources say.' 
				
				
				Ben Fulford 
				
 'The Deep State's on the run, the Deep State is panicked and 
				we're about to enter a rule of law reset.
 
					
						
						
						The first 
						phase: Kavanaugh. 
						
						The second 
						phase: Declassification. 
						
						<The third 
						phase:> Military Tribunals will go into effect for the 
						high-level players when it comes to sedition and 
						treason.' 
				
				
				Dave Janda 
				
 'The Deep State is terrified of military tribunals.
   
				We are still in a 
				state of war. Technically, it is legal right now for military 
				tribunals to take anybody who is considered an agent of a 
				foreign power and try them under a military tribunal rather than 
				in a US court of law. I think that is the bottom line. 
				   
				Kavanaugh is about 
				helping Trump take down the Deep State.' 
				
				
				Robert David Steele  
			I suppose the question 
			is,  
				
				is this 
				near-certainty and optimism justified?  
			We have to face the fact 
			that such 'imminent' predictions have been given alternative news 
			air-time from many different corners of legal and military activism 
			for many years now.  
			  
			Some of the most vocal 
			commentators lost their popularity and their credibility as a 
			consequence when historic actions did not unfold as predicted. And 
			information from anonymous insiders is difficult to completely 
			trust, because it's, well, anonymous, and therefore unverifiable.
			 
			  
			So we have to ask the 
			question as to whether these people are mostly reading each other's 
			mail, or if there is enough substantial and verifiable evidence for 
			us to put stock in the claim that a Deep State takedown is underway. 
			  
			  
			  
			The Verifiable 
			Evidence
 
 Much of the cohesion in the alternative news community stems from 
			
			the 'Q-Anon' phenomena.
 
			  
			For many analysts, the 
			consistency, reliability, insight, and authoritative voice of the 
			posts of Q-Anon on the 4Chan and 8Chan online forums have been 
			enough to convince them that Q-Anon represents a group of White 
			House insiders, probably made up of or informed by 'white hat' 
			political, military, and intelligence personnel that have direct 
			access to President Donald Trump, if indeed he is not directly part 
			of this group.  
			  
			Q refers in his drops to 
			all of the pieces of evidence below and often helps to create a 
			context that points to their significance.         
			Executive Order 
			#13818
 On December 21st, 2017, Donald Trump signed the 'Executive 
			Order Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human 
			Rights Abuse or Corruption.'
 
			  
			Those well-versed in the 
			crimes and manipulations of the Deep State find, in this document, 
			an incontestable effort to seek to reveal and prosecute the kinds of 
			crimes that have been ignored or hidden from public view by previous 
			administrations.  
			  
			As Dr. Michael Salla 
			notes in
			
			his article, 
				
				While the mainstream 
				media has largely ignored Trump's Executive Order, the 
				alternative media has been paying close attention. Many have 
				noted the Executive Order is far more significant than what it 
				appears to be on the surface.    
				Rather than just 
				freezing the financial resources of foreign citizens linked to 
				the Russian sphere of influence, as it superficially appears to 
				do, it is really targeted at members of the "Deep State" (aka 
				Cabal or Illuminati) that have been involved in human 
				trafficking, pedophilia and systemic corruption all over the 
				planet. 
			This interpretation is 
			supported by the words and actions of Attorney General Jeff 
			Sessions.  
			  
			Again, there are signs 
			that this administration is willing to speak tough about and bring 
			to light the types of crimes, including human and drug trafficking 
			and dark web activities, that are being perpetrated by the Deep 
			State and that previous administrations dared not make a mention of.
 Attorney General Jeff Sessions hosts law enforcement officials from 
			around the Western world at the DOJ's Robert F. Kennedy building in 
			Washington D.C., to discuss ways our nations can work together to 
			combat transnational criminal organizations that,
 
				
				"are so powerful and 
				so wealthy" that they "threaten the very sovereignty of 
				nation-states."  
			Sessions does not specify 
			exactly which organizations he is referring to, but he does mention 
			drug and human trafficking, the dark web, and terrorism.  
				
				"The day I was sworn 
				in as Attorney General, the president ordered me to focus on 
				dismantling transnational criminal organizations at the DOJ," 
				Sessions said.    
				"We've been faithful 
				to that order." 
				
				
				source 
			Sessions has also spoken 
			directly about the fight against child sex trafficking, and his 
			words about tackling the crimes associated with the Deep State have 
			been backed up by actions, as noted in this article about 'Operation 
			Broken Heart', 'Justice 
			Task Forces Arrest 2,300 Online Child Sex Suspects.' 
			  
			  
			  
			The Sealed 
			Indictments
 
 Much of the confidence in the imminent Deep State takedown rests on 
			the incontestable fact that there has been an unusually high number 
			of sealed indictments that have been created since the early days of 
			the Trump presidency.
 
			  
			These sealed indictments 
			can be found on the official government website pacer.gov, which 
			represents the 'Public Access to Court Electronic Records.'  
			  
			There have been 
			researcher teams taking the trouble to count the number of sealed 
			indictments entered on pacer.gov every month.  
			  
			Based on the update 
			below, for example, it is noted that there have been 55,677 sealed 
			indictments created between November 2017 and August 2018. 
			Why this is considered significant is because there have been on 
			average over 5000 new indictments created each month, while the norm 
			is noted to be a little over a thousand per year.
 
 Adding fuel to the fire is Q, who points us to the idea that the 
			appointment of federal prosecutor John Huber to work in concert with 
			Inspector General Michael Horowitz is what is allowing for the 
			possibility that so many sealed indictments are being created, each 
			of which require the convening of a secret grand jury.
 
 
			  
			 
			  
			
			As noted in 
			
			the article Q refers to,
 
				
				President Trump 
				should be very happy that Sessions chose this route of 
				appointing Huber, who has the power to seek indictments and 
				prosecute cases, and teamed him up with Horowitz, who has 470 
				investigators at his disposal, if the president wants to see 
				swift and decisive action. 
			The validity of the 
			calculation of sealed indictments and the speculation about their 
			true purpose have been brought into question by some. 
			  
			In a future article, I 
			hope to work more in-depth into what we know about these sealed 
			indictments and if the assumptions about them are correct.  
			  
			Suffice it to say for 
			here, there are a lot more sealed indictments today than there were 
			before the Trump presidency, and it seems reasonable at this 
			juncture to believe these sealed indictments point to a 
			significantly large government-driven law enforcement operation 
			going on right now. 
			  
			  
			  
			Lindsey 
			Graham's Questions to Brett Kavanaugh
 
 During the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings, Senator Lindsey 
			Graham went through a line of questioning which many are casting 
			as a dramatic foreshadowing of events soon to come:
 
				
				GRAHAM: Let's talk 
				about the law in war. Is there a body of law called the law of 
				armed conflict?KAVANAUGH: There is - there is such a body, Senator.
 
 
				GRAHAM: Is there a 
				body of law that's called the basic criminal law?KAVANAUGH: Yes, Senator.
 
 
				GRAHAM: Are there 
				differences between those two bodies of law?KAVANAUGH: Yes, Senator.
 
 
				GRAHAM: From an 
				American citizen's point of view, do your constitutional rights 
				follow you? If you're in Paris, does the Fourth Amendment 
				protect you as an American from your own government?KAVANAUGH: From your own government, yes.
 
 
				GRAHAM: OK. So if 
				you're in Afghanistan, do your constitutional rights protect you 
				against your own government?KAVANAUGH: If you're an American in Afghanistan, you have 
				constitutional rights against the U.S. government.
 
 
				GRAHAM: Is there a 
				long-standing…KAVANAUGH: That's - that's long-settled law.
 
 
				GRAHAM: Isn't there 
				also a long-settled law that - it goes back to Eisentrager case, 
				I can't remember the name of it.KAVANAUGH: Yes, Johnson vs. Eisentrager.
 
 
				GRAHAM: Right - that 
				American citizens who collaborate with the enemy have considered 
				enemy combatants?KAVANAUGH: They can be.
 
 
				GRAHAM: Can be.KAVANAUGH: They can be. They're often - some - they're sometimes 
				criminally prosecuted, sometimes treated in the military sense.
 
 
				GRAHAM: Well let's 
				talk about can be. I think the …KAVANAUGH: Under a Supreme Court precedent …
 
 
				GRAHAM: Right.KAVANAUGH: Just want to make - yeah.
 
 
				GRAHAM: There's a 
				Supreme Court decision that said that American citizens who 
				collaborated with Nazi saboteurs were tried by the military. Is 
				that correct?KAVANAUGH: That is correct.
 
 
				GRAHAM: I think a 
				couple of them were executed.KAVANAUGH: Yeah.
 
 
				GRAHAM: So if anybody 
				doubts there's a long-standing history in this country that your 
				constitutional rights follow you wherever you go, but you don't 
				have a constitutional right to turn on your own government and 
				collaborate with the enemy of the nation. 
			This exchange is unusual 
			because on its own it does not seem as though Lindsay Graham is 
			asking these questions to know about Kavanaugh's opinion on the 
			matter, but rather seems to be trying to educate the public as to 
			the difference between basic criminal law and the law of armed 
			conflict.  
			  
			More specifically, he 
			appears to be sending a message out to perpetrators of the law of 
			armed conflict - which includes those who have 'collaborated with 
			the enemy' against American citizens - that they can and will be 
			prosecuted in military tribunals. 
			  
			  
			  
			The Body of 
			Evidence
 
 Taken separately, these pieces of evidence and others I haven't 
			mentioned are not enough to justify confidence that the removal from 
			power of a force that has served as our authority all our lives is 
			about to happen right in front of our eyes.
 
			  
			However taken all 
			together, many commentators with years of experience feel that they 
			all contribute to a hidden reality that finally, humanity has gained 
			the power to bring the crimes and obfuscations perpetrated by this 
			authority we call the Deep State to light.
 We have seen that these crimes are rife in virtually all fields of 
			human endeavor:
 
				
				finance, politics, 
				education, health, entertainment, religion, science, and the 
				list goes on... 
			These have been 
			perpetrated, it would seem, all in the name of control and 
			enslavement. 
			  
			In the words of the late
			William Thompkins,  
				
				"We've been lied to 
				about everything."  
			And while some of the 
			information will be difficult for us to hear, the truth about these 
			matters is indeed poised to set us free. 
			  
			  
			  
			The Takeaway
 
 While there is no question that an actual takedown of the the Deep 
			State (the cabal, the Illuminati) would be a monumental event in the 
			history of the world, this does not mean that we need to be holding 
			our breath and disengaging from our own personal work waiting for it 
			to occur.
 
			  
			If we believe we will 
			find healing in the arraignment and conviction of Deep State 
			criminals, as we lustfully await our opportunity to spit on and 
			condemn those who have had power over us, we have somewhat missed 
			the point.
 Certainly we must exert all effort to remove these forces from 
			power; but it remains important for us reach for neutrality and 
			equanimity in the process, and step back from raw vengeance. It is 
			the perfect time to stay alert and recognize the purpose that this 
			darkness holds for us, lest we be enveloped by it.
 
			  
			As I alluded to in my 
			Lucifer series, the darkness sparks our awakening and our evolution.
			 
			  
			Lets ensure it serves us 
			in that way. 
			  
			  
			  
			  
			
			Additional Information 
				
			 
			    |