by Richard D. Eastman
In spite of the difficulties facing
America, there is still no other place I would rather live; however,
our nation is at a crossroads, not unlike the difficulties faced by
our forefathers. Many of the same conditions that prompted the
Declaration of Independence prevail in America today. Of the
indictments against the King of Great Britain, our Founders
"He has erected a Multitude of new
offices, and sent hither Swarms of Officers to harass our People
and eat out their Substance."
There are literally hundreds of
thousands of government employees administering various regulatory
agencies with budgets in the billions of dollars. Regulatory
compliance alone exceeds $460 billion annually.
Our Founders, opposed to "taxation without representation," also
declared that the King was: "...imposing Taxes on us without our
Yet, taxation with representation now sees the average American
working through May to meet his or her yearly local, state, and
federal tax obligations.
Commenting on debt, Benjamin Franklin warned:
"The burden of debt is as
destructive to freedom as subjugation by conquest."
Our legislators have not balanced the
federal budget since 1969, and the national debt has, since 1980,
quadrupled to over $4 trillion. Its monthly interest costs now
exceed the yearly interest costs of just twenty years ago.
The Declaration of Independence states:
"We hold these Truths to be
self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are
endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights."
Our second president, John Adams, said:
"You have Rights antecedent to all
earthly governments; Rights that cannot be repealed or
restrained by human laws; Rights derived from the Great
Legislator of the Universe."
Our Rights come from God. Why, then, are
we reminded that our Rights come from the state (civil rights)? What
the state gives, it can take away.
We frequently hear our nation referred to as a democracy, yet the
word is not found in the Constitution. Rather, we see in Article 1,
"The United States shall guarantee
to every State in this Union a Republican form of Government,"
The Pledge of Allegiance contains:"...and to the Republic, for
which it stands..."
Commenting on our form of government,
Chief Justice John Marshall stated: "Between a republic and a
democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos."
The Soldiers Training Manual, issued November 30, 1928 gives the
"TM 2000-25: 118-120, democracy - A
government of the masses. Authority is derived through mass
meeting or any other form of direct expression. Results in
mobocracy. Attitude toward property is communistic, negating
property rights. Attitude toward law is that the will of the
people shall regulate, whether it be based upon deliberation, or
governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse, without restraint
or regard to consequences. Results in demagogism, license,
agitation, discontent, and anarchy."
"TM2000-25: 120-121, republic - Authority is derived through
election by the people of public officials best fitted to
represent them. Attitude toward property is respect for laws and
individual rights, and a sensible economic procedure. Attitude
toward law is the administration of justice in accord with fixed
principles, and established evidence, with a strict regard to
consequences. A greater number of citizens and extent of
territory may be brought within its compass. Avoids the
dangerous extreme of either tyranny or mobocracy. Results in
statesmanship, liberty, reason, justice, contentment, and
It was upon this premise that our
Founders drafted the Declaration of Independence, our Constitution,
and the Bill of Rights. At the Constitutional Convention (1787),
Benjamin Franklin declared:
"We have been assured...in the
Sacred Writings, that except the Lord build the house, they
labor in vain that build it."
Our duty as a nation was eloquently
stated by George Washington:
"Whereas it is the duty of nations
to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey His will,
to be grateful for His benefits, and to humbly implore His
protection and favor..."
Abraham Lincoln recognized this as well:
"It is the duty of nations, as well
as of men, to owe their dependence upon the overruling power of
God, and to recognize the sublime truth announced in the Holy
Scriptures, and proven by all history, that those nations only
are blessed whose God is the Lord."
In 1892, the Supreme Court recognized:
"Our laws and our institutions must
necessarily be based upon and embody the teachings of the
Redeemer of mankind. It is impossible that it should be
What would be the reactions to such
statements made today? Outcries of "separation of church and state"?
Contrary to what is often said, this phrase will not be found in the
The foregoing statements attest to the principles which established
our Constitutional Republic. Are the difficulties confronting
America today the result of disregarding the wisdom and the warnings
of our Founders? It is conceivable there exists a hidden agenda
seeking to undermine those very principles that made America the
bastion of freedom and liberty? Consider whether or not the
following points are prominent in America today:
1) Development of the illusion
that total disarmament would be a demonstration of moral
2) Promotion of free trade between all nations regardless of
communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items
could be used for war;
3) Provision of American aid to all nations regardless of
4) Allowance of Soviet satellites individual representation
in the United Nations;
5) Promotion of the United Nations as the "only hope for
mankind". And if its charter is rewritten, demand that it be
set as a one-world government with its own independent armed
6) Resistance to any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party;
7) Usage of technical decisions in the courts to weaken
basic American institutions by claiming their activities
violate civil rights;
8) Acquisition of the schools and teachersí associations,
and their use as transmission belts for socialism and
current communist propaganda;
9) Infiltrate the press and gain control of book reviews,
editorial writing, policy-making positions;
10) Acquisition of all key positions in radio, TV, and
11) Erosion of cultural standards of morality by promoting
pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motions
pictures, and TV;
12) Presentation of homosexuality, degeneracy, and
promiscuity as normal, natural, and healthy;
13) Elimination of the American Constitution by calling it
inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a
hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide
14) Elimination of prayer or any phrase of religious
expression in the schools on the grounds that it violates
the principles of "separation of church and state";
15) Elimination of the House Committee on Un-American
16) Discreditation of the family as an institution and
encourage promiscuity and easy divorce;
17) Promotion of the need to raise children away from the
"negative" influence of parents.
These are just some of the long-term
goals of the Marxist agenda for America, and can be found in the
Congressional Record (January 10, 1963, pages A34, A35). They are
also revealed in former FBI agent Cleon Skousenís book,
Norman Thomas, for many years the U.S. Socialist Party presidential
"The American people will never
knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of liberalism,
they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until
one day America will be a socialist nation without knowing how
We have often heard many debates and
discussions about the nationís debt. But who benefits from the $800
million per day interest on the national debt?
James 5:3 says:
"You have hoarded wealth in the last
Who is James referring to?
Does this have anything to do
with the "New World Order"?
1) What are its goals?
2) Who is promoting it?
3) How much power and influence do they have?
4) How close is it?
Consider these words spoken by James
Madison in 1788 as the story unfolds:
"I believe there are more instances
of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and
silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and
For centuries, international bankers
have enjoyed a lucrative business by financing governments, and
command considerable influence in the policies of such governments.
Repayment of these loans could usually be guaranteed by the indebted
government levying taxes upon its people. If a king or government
could not or would not repay its loans, its enemy or rival would be
financed. The business of financing wars was very profitable.
As the wealth of these private banking empires increased, they
eventually owned, as private corporations, the various central banks
of Europe. Predominant among these was
the House of Rothschild, with
banking houses in major European capitals. Their seat of power was
located in London, through control of the Bank of England. By
loaning more paper into circulation than gold to back it (fractional
reserve banking), they were able to amass fortunes. Some historians
contend that by 1850, the House of Rothschild had more wealth than
the combined monarchies of Europe.
What better way to expand economic control than by financing
Europeís colonization? And what better prize was there than America,
with her industrious people and vast resources? The War of
Independence was not only independence from English rule, but
economic independence as well. Our Founders drafted the Constitution
so that only Congress had control over our monetary system, unlike
the private monopolies controlling European economics. Thomas
Jefferson issued this warning:
"If the American people ever allow
private banks to control the issue of currency, first by
inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that
will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property
until their children wake up homeless on the continent their
In 1792, contrary to Jeffersonís
warning, Alexander Hamilton established a 20 year charter with the
Bank of England. When the renewal was denied in 1812, war broke out
again. The charter was renewed in 1816. In 1833, President Andrew
Jackson removed all moneys from this chartered bank and placed them
into state banks. Mexico invaded Texas in 1836 after the renewal was
Some historians say these wars were attempts by the European banking
monopolies to disrupt and control Americaís economy. The Civil War
continued this pattern.
Abraham Lincoln said:
"The money powers prey upon the
nation in times of peace and conspire against it in times of
adversity. It is more despotic than a monarchy, more insolent
than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. It denounces, as
public enemies, all who question its methods or throw light upon
its crimes. I have two great enemies, the Southern Army in front
of me and the bankers in the rear. Of the two, the one at my
rear is my greatest foe...corporations have been enthroned, and
an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money
power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by
working upon the prejudices of the people until the wealth is
aggregated in the hands of a few, and the Republic is
By the end of the 19th Century, American
industrialists and bankers, through the Industrial Revolution, had
achieved great wealth. An excellent account of this is Matthew Josephsonís 1934 book, entitled "The Robber Barons; the Great
American Capitalists 1861-1901.
The industrialists were known as "Big Business" and the Wall Street
bankers as the "Money Trust". The most prominent of these was banker
It was Morgan, working with the European banking dynasties, who
created the "Financial Panic of 1907". This was an effort to
manipulate Congress to approve of a central bank.
In 1912, Woodrow Wilson became President. His chief advisor and
administrator was Col. Edward Mandell House, who was a proponent of
world government, a representative of the European banking
dynasties, and had close ties with the Morgan interests.
In 1912, House wrote a book, wherein he laid out a plan to bring
America into a world government. ("Philip Dru -
Col. Edward Mandell House, 1912. On page 222, he
wrote: "...our Constitution and our laws...are not only obsolete,
but even grotesque."
His plan, and, to use his own words, "a conspiracy," would seek to
1. The establishment
of a central bank
2. A progressive graduated income tax
3. Control of both political parties in the U.S.
What was Houseís goal? "Socialism as
dreamed of by Karl Marx". House, who called himself the "unseen
guardian angel" of the Federal Reserve Act, in concert with the Wall
Street and European bankers, convinced President Wilson of the
central bank concept.
The Federal Reserve Act was passed on Dec. 23, 1913 (by a vote of
298 to 60 in the House of Representatives, and 43 to 25 in the
After the vote, Congressman Charles A. Lindberg, Sr. (father of the
famous aviator) told Congress:
"This act establishes the most
gigantic trust on earth... When the President signs this act, the
invisible government by the money power, proven to exist by the
Money Trust Investigation, will be legalized... The new law will
create inflation whenever the trust wants inflation..."
The Fed was then able to manipulate the
money supply. In the six years prior to the 1929 Stock Market Crash,
the Fed increased (or inflated) the money supply 62X, inducing
unwise investments and market speculation by the public. When
everything was in place, the bankers, who had been financing market
speculation, called in their "24 hr. broker call loans",
precipitating the Crash.
They were then in a position to loan the government billions of
dollars to finance the nation out of the Depression. Congressman
Louis McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking Committee, (1920-1931)
"It (the Depression) was not
accidental. The international bankers sought to bring about a
condition of despair here so that they might emerge as rulers of
How powerful is the Fed? Congressman
Wright Patman, Chairman of House Banking Committee (in the 60s)
"In the U.S. today, we have in
effect, two governments...we have the duly constituted
government...then we have an independent, uncontrolled, and
uncoordinated government in the Federal Reserve System,
operating the money powers which are reserved to the Congress by
The Fed has never been audited, and has
resisted all attempts to do so. Lt. Col. Archibald Roberts (Director
of Committee to Restore the Constitution) began a campaign on March
30, 1971, testifying before Wisconsin legislators about the fraud
surrounding the Fed. (The text of his address is in the
Congressional Record, E3212-E3224, entered April 19, 1971). Roberts
and other constitutional groups (including Washington state Senator
Jack Metcalf) had, by the mid 80ís, acquired about 20 statesí
support calling for audits/reforms, with no success.
Again, in the late 80s, Congressman Henry Gonzales (Texas) called
for abolition of the Federal Open Market Committee and the repeal of
the Federal Res. Act. (HR 1469, 1470).
Congressman Phil Crane (Illinois) also introduced HR 70, calling for
an audit. (Currently, Gonzales and Crane are calling for an
audit/reforms under HR 28 and 145; Senator Byron Dorgan, (N. Dakota)
is calling for a similar bill in the Senate, S212).
Since Wilson took office, the national debt has risen from $1
billion to over $4 trillion - thatís just "on budget" debt. When
added to the "off budget" debt of the S&L debacle and unfunded
retirement liabilities, the total now exceed our GDP.
Is the country bankrupt? Roosevelt declared so by Executive Orders
6073, 6102,6111, and also by EO 6260 on March 9, 1933 (as proclaimed
under the "Trading With the Enemy Act of 65th Congress, Oct. 6,
1917, and as codified at 12 U.S.C.A. 95a, which allows the President
exceptional control under a "state of emergency").
On April 5, 1933, FDR issued this EO:
"All persons are required to deliver on or before May 1, 1933 all
gold coins, gold bullion, and gold certificates now owned by them to
a Federal Reserve Bank, branch or agency, or to any member bank of
the Federal Reserve System.
On June 5, 1933, Congress confirmed the bankruptcy. (through the
"Joint Resolution to Suspend The Gold Standard And Abrogate The Gold
Clause, June 5, 1933"). This was HJR 192, 73rd Congress, 1st
Then, through another EO issued by President Johnson in 1968, silver
backing was removed from our currency. This made the country
insolvent. The Fed issues currency no longer redeemable for silver.
Furthermore, the Fed is not a government institution.
You will seldom find them listed in phone directories under
"government offices". It is a private corporation owned by
approximately 300 Class A stockholders. These people own the Fed by
owning the stock of the largest member banks in the New York Federal
Reserve Bank, which, for all practical purposes, is
The controlling interest is held by less than a dozen international
bankers, whose names, until recently, was one of the best-kept
secrets of international finance:
Banks of London & Berlin
2. Lehman Bros. Bank of N.Y.
3. Lazard Bros. Banks of Paris
4. Kuhn, Loeb Bank of N.Y.
5. Israel Moses Sief Banks of Italy
6. Chase Manhattan Bank of N.Y.
7. Warburg Bank of Hamburg & Amsterdam
8. Goldman, Sachs Bank of N.Y.
The most influential of the European
the Rothschild family in
London. Each of the American
interests is, in various ways, connected to this family, including
the Rockefellers, who are by far the most powerful of the Fedís
American stockholders (primarily through the Chase Manhattan Bank).
Thomas Jefferson issued this warning:
"If the American people ever allow
private banks to control the issue of currency, first by
inflation, then by deflation, the banks and the corporations
that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all
property until their children wake up homeless on the continent
their fathers conquered."
Today, less than 2% of Americans own
The Fed, like other central banks, uses a system called "fractional
banking." Deposits become the "fraction", allowing the system to
"create" as much as 770% of that deposit: i.e.: a $1,000 deposit
becomes approximately $7,700 a $10.000 deposit becomes approximately
In addition, examine the "amount due" on your property tax
statement: You will not find a dollar sign affixed to that "amount".
Why? The Currency Act of 1792, which has never been revoked, defines
a dollar as 412.5 grains of 9/10 fine silver (originally 371.25
grains of 11/12 fine silver). Federal Reserve Notes are not
redeemable in silver. To affix a dollar sign to the "amount due"
would be fraudulent. They know this - and you donít.
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 5 says that only Congress has the power
to..."coin money, regulate the value thereof...and fix the standard
of weights and measures." Article 1, Section 10,
Clause 1 says that No State shall...make anything but gold and
silver coin a legal tender in payment of debts..." The Federal
Reserve operates in violation of the Constitution.
Since Col. House helped establish the Federal Reserve Act, and
believed in socialism, is the central bank concept Marxist?
Plank 5 of Karl Marxís Communist Manifesto reads:
"Centralization of credit in the
hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State
capital, and an exclusive monopoly".
[Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx; available at General Birch
Services. P.O. Box 8040, Appleton, Wis. 54913-8040.]
House also knew, that in addition to
controlling a nationís monetary system, a method of taxation had to
be established, and in 1913, the 16th Amendment was passed.
This graduated income tax was hailed by proponents as a "tax on the
wealthy" (sound familiar?). Nothing could have been farther from the
truth. As with the passage of the Federal Reserve Act, "Big
Business" and the Wall Street bankers publicly denounced, but
privately funded its promotion and passage. Why? Through their
influence in government circles, they insured the necessary
loopholes in the bill were included - tax-exempt foundations. By the
time the 16th Amendment was passed, they had already established the
Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundations. Their wealth was allowed to
compound tax-free while their competitors were saddled with tax
burdens. The Amendment also allowed Congress to increase and broaden
the tax on the general public.
Until 1929, the size and cost of the Federal government was
Constitutionally limited: it borrowed little money and paid little
interest. The Depression years following the Stock Market Crash
changed all this. With the country officially bankrupt in 1933,
taxes could now be broadened and increased to finance government
Rooseveltís New Deal began the era of entitlements which are with us
Two points must be made here:
1) The 16th Amendment was
never properly ratified. This has been proven in court. Two of
the 36 states that had allegedly ratified the amendment were
California and Kentucky - There is no record of Californiaís
vote, and Kentucky legislators voted against it 22-9. This
violates the amendment procedure of our Constitution, Article V.
2) The 16th Amendment has Marxist roots. Plank 2 of the
Communist Manifesto calls for: "a heavy progressive or graduated
income tax". Thus, the conspirators, through financial influence
and brilliant deception, had established the mechanisms to:
1. run up the debt
2. collect the debt
3. for themselves, to avoid the taxes necessary
to pay the interest on the debt
Can you begin to see why there have been
195 tax increases since 1933?
Today, three quarters of the Federal budget is unconstitutional,
according to Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 2-18. Why do our elected
representatives allow this? Remember, the third item on Col. Houseís
agenda was to control both political parties of the U.S.
"Tragedy and Hope, A History of the
World in Our Time" (1966) was
written by Georgetown University Professor Carroll Quigley. It
was intended as a text for aspiring globalists, and gives a 1300
page account of the history, mechanisms, and goals through which
a ruling financial dynasty would control a global economy. On
page 52, the author writes that the international bankers were:
"...devoted to secrecy and the secret use of financial influence
in political life."
There are two organizations formed by
and intimately associated with the international bankers:
The Council on
The Tri Lateral Commission
Letís examine briefly their background
and their stated goals.
Because America refused to join the League of Nations following WWI,
representatives from the American financial dynasties met with their
British counterparts in Paris on May 19, 1919. The American
contingent was led by Col. House and became known as the Council on
Foreign Relations (CFR). It was founded on July 29, 1921, backed by
Rockefeller and Carnegie Foundation money. It included many of the
same people who established the Federal Reserve. Its quarterly
journal, Foreign Affairs, has called for world government as far
back as December, 1922.
CFR member James Warburg (whose father Paul Warburg merged his
Manhattan Bank with Rockefellerís Chase Bank), a former aide to FDR,
told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee this on Feb. 17, 1950:
"You shall have world government, whether or not you like it, by
conquest or consent.
Their goal: "...building a new international order (which) must be
responsive to world aspirations for peace (and) for social and
economic change... an international order...including states
labeling themselves as Socialist."
In the 50th anniversary issue of Foreign Affairs, a leading article
was written by CFR member Kingman Brewster, Jr., entitled
"Reflections on Our National Purpose". In this article, he stated
that our national purpose should be to abolish our nationality.
In a 1974 article in Foreign Affairs, entitled "The Hard Road to
World Order", CFR member Richard Gardner wrote that the house of
world order would have to be built through: "...an end run around
our national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece.
As of June 1992, the CFR has 2905 members in the U.S. (1992 Annual
Report, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Harold Pratt House, 58
E 68th St., N.Y., N.Y.10022
The second organization, The Tri Lateral Commission, was formed in
1973 by David Rockefeller (grandson of John D. Rockefeller). David
Rockefeller has also been a director of the CFR since 1949.
The Tri Lat was the brainchild of Columbia University professor
Zbigriew Bzrezinski, who, in his book Between Two Ages, advocated an
economic alliance among the western industrialized nations.
Rockefeller hired Bzrezinski, made him the executive director, and
established a tri-lateral alliance encompassing Japan, North
America, and western Europe. Its first meeting was held in Tokyo
Oct. 21, 1973.
In Bzrezinskiís book, the author states: on page 198 - America is in
obsolescence; on page 260 - he advocates central (Marxist) planning;
on page 296 - he wants to develop limitations on sovereignty; on
pages 308 and 309 of his book, he finally states his goal: a world
Henry Kissinger is one of the most powerful and influential members
of the Tri Lat (also CFR). He was interviewed by columnist Paul
Scott, who said that it is Kissingerís belief that by controlling
energy, especially oil, one can control nations and their financial
By placing food, oil, and the worldís monetary system under
international control, Kissinger is convinced that a world
government can become a reality. As of April, 1992, the Tri Lateral
Commission has 320 members divided up among Japan, North America,
and Western Europe. (The Tri Lateral Commission, 345 E. 46th St.,
N.Y., N.Y. 10017)
The Tri Latís goal is a world government, the same as that of the CFR. The first 35 members of the Tri Lat were also members of the
CFR. They both have as members some of the most elite names in
finance, industry, media, labor, academic circles, and government.
Their rosters read like a whoís who in these areas.
Whatís the difference between the CFR and the Tri Lat?
The CFR has been around since 1921, the Tri Lat, since 1973. The
only difference is the fact that the Tri Lat is an elite group,
whoís been chosen to speed up the process of a one-world government
through the control of food, energy, and an international monetary
Keep in mind that economic union always precedes political union.
Letís examine the CFR and Tri Lat influence in government.
CFR control in government actually began in earnest in 1939 by
establishing within the U.S. State Department a "Committee on
Post-War Problems", the group (staffed and funded by the CFR) which
designed the United Nations (the story of which is contained in
State Dept. Publication 2349-"Report To The President On The Results
of the San Francisco Conference").
Since WWII, the CFR has filled key positions in virtually every
administration since then. Furthermore, since Eisenhower, every man
who has won the nomination for either party (except Goldwater in
1964 and Reagan in 1980) has been a member of the CFR:
1. John W. Davis(1924)
2. Adlai Stevenson (1952,56)
3. John F. Kennedy (1960)
4. Hubert Humphrey (1968)
5. George McGovern (1972)
6. Jimmy Carter (1976,80)
7. Walter Mondale (1984)
8. Michael Dukakis (1988)
9. Bill Clinton (1992)
1. Herbert Hoover (1928,32)
2. Wendell Wilkie (1940)
3. Thomas Dewey (1944,48)
4. Dwight Eisenhower (1952,56)
5. Richard Nixon (1960,68,72)
6. Gerald Ford (1976)
7. George Bush (1988,92) (who was also a director of the
An important point must be stressed: By
controlling the candidates we vote for, the CFR is assured their
goal of world government. Why? Because CFR presidents fill key
positions with CFR members by APPOINTMENT.
(List of 110 Nixon appts. can be found in None Dare Call it
Conspiracy, by Gary Allen, 1972; available from General Birch
Services, P.O. Box 8040, Appleton, Wis. 54913)
Since 1973, Tri Lat members have also filled key positions. One of
the first members of the Tri Lat was Jimmy Carter, whose
administration had 19 Tri Lateralists including:
1. Vice President
2. Secretary of State Vance
3. Secretary of the Treasury Blumenthal
4. Secretary of Defense Brown
5. National Security Advisor Bzrezinski
These five positions made up the
National Security Council, and were held by members of an
organization which advocates world government - was their oath of
office to uphold the Constitution a mere formality? Others included:
1) nearly all of the
undersecretaries of State
2) nearly all of the
undersecretaries of Treasurer
3) the Panama Canal
4) the Salt Treaty
5) the Ambassador to the
U.N. Andrew Young
6) the Ambassador to
Italy, Richard Gardner (remember, the Israel Moses Sief
Banks of Italy are top stockholders in the Fed, and Gardner
advocated an "...end run around our national Sovereignty,
eroding it piece by piece")
An article about Bzrezinski (Carterís
National Security Advisor, executive director of the Tri Lat, and
author of Between Two Ages) and Carter appeared in the March 1, 1978
New York Times:
"The two men met for the first time
about four years ago, when Mr. Bzrezinski was the executive
director of the Tri Lateral Commission, and had the foresight to
ask the then obscure governor of Georgia to join its ranks.
Their initial teacher-student relationship blossomed during the
campaign and appears to have grown closer still."
Bzrezinski (teacher) praises Marxism,
thinks the U.S. is in obsolescence, and advocates a world
government; the student was the President of the United States!
Another article, written by CFR past president Winston Lord,
appeared in the August 4-ll, 1978 issue of "W" magazine. He boasted:
"The Tri Lateral Commission doesnít secretly run the world, the
Council of Foreign Relations does that." Winston Lord is currently
the Assistant Secretary for East Asian/Pacific Affairs (State Dept.)
and special envoy to Red China.
Contrary to candidate Clintonís "stand" on human rights, Red China
has recently received an unconditional MFN trade status with the
U.S.; never mind that over 10,000 Chinese dissidents have been
murdered since Tianemen Square.
The CFR domination of just the last three Administrations reveals:
1. 347 under Reagan;
2. 382 under Bush, and
3. 387 under Clinton (over 1 in 8 of their total membership)
The following CFR members hold top
positions in our current Administration:
1. President Bill Clinton
2. Vice President Al Gore
3. Secretary of State Warren Christopher
4. Deputy Secretary of State Clifton R. Wharton
5. CIA Director R. James Woolsey
6. National Security Advisor W. Anthony Lake
7. Deputy National Security Advisor Samuel R. Berger
8. Secretary of Defense Les Aspen
9. Chrmn., Intel. Adv. Bd. William J. Crowe
10. U.N. Ambassador Madeleine Albright
11. Sec. H.& H.S. Donna E. Shalala
12. OMB Alice M. Rivlin
13. Secretary H.U.D. Henry G. Cisneros
14. Chrmn., Council Ec. Advisors Laura D. Tyson
15. Secretary of the Treasury Lloyd M. Bentsen (former CFR)
16. Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt
17. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg
There are 370 others as well.
Have you ever wondered why, since WWII, U.S. foreign policy has
allowed Communist expansion? Consider the roles of the following CFR
members since WWII:
1. George Marshall and Dean
Acheson engineered the betrayal of Chiang Kai-shek, allowing
communist takeover of China;
2. Dean Acheson and Dean Rusk arranged the no-win
undeclared war in Korea and the removal of General McArthur;
3. John Foster Dulles and Allen Dulles, under CFR
President Eisenhower betrayed Hungarian freedom fighters and
knowingly brought Fidel Castro to power in Cuba;
4. McGeorge Bundy, Adlai Stevenson, and John J. McCloy
saw to it that the Bay of Pigs invasion to oust Castro failed;
5. Dean Rusk, Robert McNamara, and Henry Cabot Lodge
pushed the U.S. into Vietnam - and then drew up the rules making
6. Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger continued these
policies, which led to communist takeover of South Vietnam,
Cambodia, and Laos;
7. Henry Kissinger, Ellsworth Bunker, and Sol Linowitz
arranged for the Panama Canal giveaway - and gave $400 million
dollars to that Marxist dictatorship to take it;
8. Under leadership of Zbigniew Bzrezinski, Cyrus Vance,
and Warren Christopher, the Carter Administration undermined
U.S. allies in Iran and Nicaragua;
9. Under Reagan, George Schultz, William J. Casey, and
Malcom Baldridge arranged U.S. foreign aid to communist Romania,
communist Poland, and the U.S.S.R.; they also impeded
anti-Communists in El Salvador and Nicaragua.
Why? It is easier to control oppressive
Marxist regimes than nations of free men - in a one-world socialist
Yes, Col. Houseís agenda of controlling both political parties in
the U.S. has been achieved, through, as Madison warned, "silent and
gradual encroachment." An excellent history of the CFR is found in
The Shadows of Power (James Perloff, 1988).
Just as Col. House led an American contingent to Paris in 1919,
there are also powerful like-minded organizations in Europe, through
financial control, promoting a one-world government.
The most prominent of these is
the Bilderbergers (est. in 1954), and
is largely responsible for the unification of Europe through the
Treaty of Rome (1957).
Regardless of where these groups are from, their goal is a world
government, and the U.N.. which they established, is the platform
from which it will be launched.
Global Tyranny...Step by Step (by
William Jasper, 1992) gives a
well-documented examination of the past, present, and future role of
the United Nations in the emerging
New World Order.
The titles of a
few of its chapters:
* Chapter 1 The New World Army
* Chapter 3 The U.N. Founders
* Chapter 5 The Drive for World Government
* Chapter 8 The U.N. Grab for Your Child
* Chapter 10 The New World Money System
The author also presents ways we can
reverse this encroachment against our liberty and freedom.
The Rockefellers play a key role in Americaís financial and
political life. Currently, David Rockefeller is the honorary
chairman of both the CFR and the Tri Lateral Commission, as well as
(through his Chase Manhattan Bank) a top stockholder in the Federal
The Rockefeller influence goes back to 1890, when John D.
Rockefeller was refining nearly 90% of all crude oil in the country,
and frequently worked in concert with Wall Street banker J.P.
Morgan. By the turn of the century, John D. purchased the Chase Bank
and brother William bought the National City Bank of New York, and
in 1913, became part of
the Federal Reserve System.
The Rockefeller Foundation was also in full operation by that time,
effectively nullifying the "tax on the wealthy" as the proponents of
16th Amendment had sought.
According to the Sept. 16, 1916 New York Times, the Rockefeller oil
holdings alone were worth $500 million. By 1930, the 200 largest
corporations, under Rockefeller and Morgan influence, held over 49%
of the assets of all 40,000 corporations in the country.
AT&T (controlled by Morgan) had greater assets than the total wealth
in 21 states.
The influence of the Rockefeller and Morgan groups was so great,
they could affect the economic life of the country to a large degree
and almost control its political life on the Federal level.
The Rockefellers increased their leverage over the economy
throughout the Depression years:
1) many of their
competitors were hard-hit by the Stock Market Crash
2) and, being a part of
the Fed, the Rockefellers benefited from massive government
3) which, in turn,
furthered their control of industry, soon to be mobilized
for war production
Americaís entry into WWII enhanced all
of the above, and their wealth continued to be funneled into the
Following the War, the U.S. was in such bad economic condition, that
in 1950, it declared bankruptcy a second time and the Secretary of
Treasury was appointed as "Receiver" in the Bankruptcy
(Reorganization Plan No. 26, Title 5 U.S.C.A 903, Public Law 94-564,
Legislative History, page 5967).
In 1953, Congressman Carroll Reese of Tennessee initiated a
Congressional Committee to investigate the tremendous influence of
the huge tax-exempt foundations and their control over the economy.
Yet, even Congress had little influence in diminishing the
tremendous influence and control the international bankers exercised
in the economy. The Rockefellerís wealth continued to expand - their
foundations allows their wealth to compound.
Each year the Rockefeliers can dump up to half of their income into
their foundations and deduct these donations from their income tax.
Nelson Rockefeller admitted at his confirmation hearings (for V.P.):
"The foundation pays no capital
gains tax and no income tax, so those funds can continue to
And indeed they have. The following
information on the Rockefellerís more current wealth is derived from
Congressman Patmanís Report in the Congressional Record. What I am
about the give you is direct ownership of stock; pay particular
attention to the oil companies.
In direct stock, they own: Exxon - 156.7 million; Rockefeller Center
- 98 million; Standard of California - 85 million; IBM - 72.6
million; Chase Manhattan Bank - 18 million. Others that they have 10
million or more in are: Mobil Oil, Eastman Kodak, General Electric,
Texas Instruments, Minnesota Mining & Mfg., and they own significant
portions of about 50 other major American companies.
A look at their security holdings reveals: They control
Chase-Manhattan Bank, City National Bank of New York, and Chemical
Bank, among others; these are in the top of the list.
The Chase Manhattan Bank deals in many foreign countries as well as
corporations: well over 100 countries with about 50,000 affiliated
A look at the interlocking boards of directors in the insurance
industry, at the time this data was compiled, the Rockefellers
controlled 3 of the 4 largest insurance companies in the world, that
being Metropolitan Life, Equitable Life, and New York Life. The
assets of these three at that time was $113 billion. They control
others as well.
Just to summarize the banks and insurance companies, this amounts to
25% of all the assets of the 50 largest banks, and 30% of all the
assets of the 50 largest life insurance companies. This gives them
leverage over the economy that goes far beyond direct ownership.
Congressman Patman also found that if you control 5% or more of the
stock in a corporation, whose stock is widely held, you have in
effect, minority control. If we take those corporations that the
Rockefeller family has 10% control, or 5%, and at least two members
of their board of directors, we have the following:
Exxon, Mobil Oil, Standard of California, Standard of Indiana,
International Harvester, Inland Steel, Marathon Oil, Quaker Oats,
Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel, Freeport Sulphur, and International Basic
Economy Corporation. Corporations which are probably under
Rockefeller influence, and I say probably, because itís extremely
difficult to trace stock ownership through trusts and foundations,
Texaco, IT&T, Westinghouse, Boeing, International Paper, Sperry
Rand, Xerox, National Cash Register, National Steel, American Home
Products, Pfizer, Avon, and Merck.
Merck has just agreed to buy Medco Containment, the nationís largest
marketer of discount prescription medicines. The acquisition makes
Merck, by far, the biggest integrated producer and distributor of
pharmaceuticals in the country. (Wall Street Journal, 7-29-93).
Transportation companies under the Rockefeller influence include
Penn Central, TWA, Eastern Airlines, United Airlines, National
Airlines, Delta, Braniff, and Consolidated Freightways.
Others they control through interlocking boards of directors are:
Pittsburgh Plate Glass
Isnít that odd?
Whoís the biggest stock holders in Chrysler and you had to bail them
out? Otherís are CIT Financial, SS Kresge and RH Macy.
To summarize what Iíve just given you, thatís 37 of the top 100
industrials, 9 of the top 20 transportation firms, the nationís No.
1 utility, three of the top four insurance companies, plus scores of
smaller companies engaged in manufacturing, distribution, retail
sales, loans or investments. These are just the known figures.
So can you start to see the economic power the Rockefeller family.
Now, in addition to this, recognize the power they have through the
membership in the Tri Lateral Commission and the CFR through other
heads of multi-national corporations.
There were published several reports under the Senate Investigating
Subcommittee on Reports, Accounting, and Management." Theyíre under
the "Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate,
The first report is entitled " Interlocking Boards of Directors
Among Major U.S. Corporations".
This Senate study looked at the top 130 corporations and placed
every name of every board of directors into a computer and found
this: 70% of the top 130 corporations are interlocked directly or
indirectly with the lower companies. They even found many competing
companies and corporations have the same board of directors and
several members of the same board of directors, which is illegal
according to Section 8 of the Clayton Act.
When this point is reached, you donít have competition anymore, you
have price-fixing. Some of these people were sitting on 16
difference boards of directors! In the April 1993 IBM proxy
statement, this can be demonstrated. Also, 8 of these 18 directors
are CFR. (IBM Notice of 1993 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement;
IBM, Armonk, N.Y. 10504)
The second report the same committee did was called "Voting
Rights-Major U.S. Corporations". They looked at 122 corporations and
found this: One corporation, Morgan Guaranty and Trust, was in the
top five vote-holders of 57 of those corporations; another, City
National Bank of New York, was in the top five voteholders of 36 of
Thatís 93 of the top 122 corporations. Now, who was the top
vote-holder in the parent company of Morgan Guaranty and Trust?
Number one was City National Bank of New York, and number two was
the Chase Manhattan Bank, which means that the Rockefellers
controlled Morgan Guaranty and Trust and also the City National Bank
of New York.
The Rockefellers are in the top five voteholders in 93 of those 122
corporations. This is what the Subcommittee found in 1978.
Why didnít we hear about it? At that time, half of the members of
the Senate Subcommittee over this study were CFR/Tri Lat.
There shouldnít be much doubt who controls the oil here. But what
about the Middle East oil? Now, supposedly, OPEC has nationalized,
in most cases, the oil fields over there. Aramco, an oil consortium
of Exxon, Mobil, Texaco, and SOCAL got 42ct on every petrodollar and
OPEC 586 during the late 70ís "energy crisis ". Do you think it
bothered them that the price of gas doubled while the media was
telling us there was an oil shortage?
The Tri Lat "engineered" the crisis. Its planning publication is
called the "Triangle Papers". On page 73 of Publication No. 17,
entitled "Energy: Managing the Transition" (1978), we find this:
"We therefore urge each Tri Lateral
government to review its tax structure and develop specific
energy taxes. An obvious example here is a higher federal excise
tax on gasoline in the United States."
In other words, they created the crisis,
and we paid for it at the pumps through higher prices and higher
taxes. Who got blamed? OPEC.
The same people who control the oil here also exercise control in
the Middle East. According to the 1974 report of the Senate Foreign
Relations Subcommittee on Multinational Corporations, the Aramco
consortium attempted to block Americaís emergency airlift to Israel,
during the Yom Kippur War of 1973.
These companies cooperated closely with Saudi Arabia to deny oil and
fuel to the U.S. Navy. In the 1930s, it was Standard Oil
(Rockefeller) money that established the oil industry over there -
Makes one wonder about Desert Storm.
Remember, it is Kissingerís belief that a world government can be
brought about by controlling an international monetary system,
oil/energy, and food. Consider how far the control of food has
In the seventies, Senator Gannon ran
a study in five counties of Kansas. He found that 85,000 acres
over the 8,OOO acres legal limit were illegally owned by large
The American Agriculture paper also reported that six coal
companies, who were in turn controlled by the oil companies,
owned somewhere in the neighborhood of 80% of the farm land in
Illinois. These are just a few examples.
Remember, in 1973, the Tri Lateral
Commission was formed, and in 1973 the large multinational
corporations started diversifying. Into what? Food.
Through interlocking directors, at the time of this study,
Gulf was interlocked with
General Foods and Ralston Purina
Mobil Oil with General Foods and
Standard of California with
American Potato, Basic Vegetable Products, and Broadway Hale
Atlantic Richfield Co. with
Lincoln County Livestock, and Diamond A Cattle
Philips Petroleum with Campbell
Citgo with Kraft and Campbell
Getty Oil with A&P and Carnation
Standard Oil of Ohio with
Hesslup with Borden
Safeway is controlled by the
Chase Manhattan Bank
Tenneco controlled, at the time
of this report, approximately one and a half million acres
of land, gas, oil, and chemicals
IT&T is interlocked with
Case (farm implements) and
International Harvester are controlled by the Rockefellers
and John Deereís president, at that time, a member of the
Tri Lateral Commission
Who was the biggest beef producer
through feedlots and fatteners? Greyhound bus. Who was the biggest
pork producer in the world? Arnior, owned by Greyhound bus. One of
the largest cattle feeders by volume in the U.S. as well as one of
the largest grain companies is Cargill, (run by Whitney McMillan,
Tri Lat member), and they bought Missouri Beef, one of the largest
beef packing plants.
Does the recent "collapse" of the U.S.S.R. tie into the New World
The plans to bring the Soviet Union into a one-world government goes
back to 1907 (see Tragedy and Hope, A History of the World in Our
Time, by Carroll Quigley,1966; The McMillan CO., N.Y., available
Angriff Press, P.O. Box 2726, Hollywood, California 90028).
The very same people who established the Federal Reserve Act, the
graduated income tax, and the CFR also bankrolled the Bolshevik
Revolution. This was a well-known fact in intelligence circles at
In 1953, CFR member H. Rowan Gaither (Chairman of Ford Foundation)
made a statement to Norman Dodd (chief investigator for the special
Congressional Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations):
"We shall use our grant-making power
to so alter life in the United States that we can be comfortably
merged with the Soviet Union."
Consider the following excerpts from the
Washington Post Weekly (May 4, 1992):
"The IMF, the World Bank, and the
major industrial nations have decided to take a risk with Russia
and former Soviet Republics. ..Russian Deputy Prime Minister
Yegor Gaidar...last week swept through Washington, reassuring
business leaders, as well as finance ministers and central
bankers from the Group of Seven major industrial nations."
"In an effort to get the banking system under control, Gerald
Corrigan, the President of the New York Federal Reserve Bank (CFR/Tri
Lat), has been visiting Moscow regularly since September (1991)
to advise the Central bank and commercial banks. An acquaintance
of former Fed Chairman Paul A. Volcker (CFR/Tri Lat), says
Volcker is close to an agreement that would make him consultant
to Russian President Boris Yeltzin."
"In addition, David Rockefeller (CFR/Tri Lat), a former Chairman
of the Chase Manhattan Bank, says he has agreed to be part of a
group Corrigan is assembling that might help establish banking
business in Russia."
"Once the IMF program is in place, the World Bank will supply
direct support to the agriculture and oil sectors of the Russian
"The oil sector is enough to solve any financial Crisis they
(the Russians) might have", says World Bank President Lewis
Preston (CFR & formerly with Morgan Guaranty). He says there are
33 undeveloped fields in W. Siberia."
Isnít that interesting? The World Bank
and the IMF are "supporting" the agriculture and oil sectors thereby
controlling the food and energy. It would be more accurate to say
that the CFR/Tri Lat are controlling the agriculture and oil
Furthermore, the CFR/Tri Lat involvement in Russiaís central bank
has recently (July 26, 1993) mandated a call in of all pre-1993
rubles, crippling the ability of the Russian citizen to provide for
Not only does the U.S. taxpayer underwrite about 20% of the IMF and
World Bank funding, but the afore-mentioned "G-7Ē central bankers
are also stockholders in our Federal Reserve.
Yeltzin is working closely with the CFR/Tri Lat - what about
Gorbachev? I have a transcript of Gorbachevís May 6, 1992 speech
given at Westminster College (Missouri). On page 9 he states:
"However, even now, at a time of
sharply increased interdependence in the world, many countries
are morbidly jealous of their sovereignty, many peoples of their
national independence and identity - This is one of the newest
global contradictions, one which must be overcome by joint
(Speech May 6, 1992, Westminster College, "The River of Time and
the Imperative of Action" pg 9, by Mikhail Sergeyevich
In Vancouver earlier this year,
President Clinton promised Yeltzin $1.6 billion in direct
assistance, in addition to the billions promised by the G-7; Yet
most Americans have no idea as to how long and how much Western aid
and trade has gone into the USSR since 1917.
1) After the Bolshevik
Revolution, Standard Oil of New Jersey (Rockefeller) bought 50%
of Nobelís huge Caucasus oil fields
2) In 1927, Standard Oil of New York (Rockefeller) built
a refinery in Russia
3) In 1928, Rockefellerís Chase Bank was involved in
selling Bolshevik Bonds in the U.S. - patriotic organizations
denounced Chase as an international fence"
In the Congressional Record of June 15,
1933, Congressman Louis McFadden said: "The Soviet government has
been given U.S. Treasury funds by the Federal Reserve Banks acting
through the Chase Bank and Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. and other banks
in New York City...Open up the books of Amtorg, the trading
organization of the Soviet government in New York, and of Gostorg,
the general office of the Soviet Trade Organization, and the State
Bank of the U.S.S.R. and you will be staggered to see how much
American money has been taken from the U.S. Treasury for the benefit
of Russia. Find out what business has been transacted for the State
Bank of Soviet Russia by its correspondent, the Chase Bank of New
I might add that Congressman McFadden later died under "mysterious
The following information is derived from Antony Suttonís
Best Enemy Money Can Buy, (by Antony Sutton,
Sutton is acknowledged as the foremost expert on western technology
and Soviet economic development. He was a research fellow at the
Hoover Institute On War & Peace; and therefore had access to
information most researchers outside establishment circles were
denied. Revealing this information cost him his job.
1) Ford set up the Gorki
vehicle plant in 1929, upgraded by the Lend-Lease programs of
WWII; vehicles produced in this plant were used against U.5.
troops in Korea and Vietnam;
2) The Soviet tank industry began in 1929 under the guise
of producing tread-type tractors; The Stalingrad plant was
entirely constructed in the U.S., dismantled, and re-erected in
the U.S.S.R. by American engineers. This was just one of several
which utilized American machine tools and equipment;
3) In 1946, the Soviets bought 55 Rolls Royce turbo-jet
engines from Great Britain, and reproduced them in quantity on
American and German machine tools. These engines powered the
MiG-15 fighters, used against our F-86 Sabre jets in Korea;
4) 37 of the 96 Soviet ships regularly employed on the "Haiphong
Run" during the Vietnam War (keeping North Vietnam supplied)
used diesel engines of western origin.
The missile-carrying Soviet ships of the 1962 Cuban Missile
Crisis were propelled by engines produced in Denmark - a NATO
5) From 1960 until 1972, the Soviets sought acquisition
of a specialized machine tool manufactured by the Bryant
Chucking Company of Springfield, Vermont.
This machine, the "Centalign B", produced high-precision
miniature ball bearings, supplying 85% of its output to the U.S.
defense industry for guidance systems in our missiles.
Under President Nixon and National Security Advisor Henry
Kissinger, approval was given in 1972 to export 164 of these
machines to the U.S.S.R.
By 1974, the Soviets had MIRVíd their ICBMs. This was made
public on March 8, 1983 by Secretary of Defense Casper
Weinberger, stating that the greatly improved accuracy of Soviet
missiles was derived from U.S. technology;
6) In the 70ís, the Kama River truck plant was built in
the Soviet Union. It covers 36 square miles and can produce
100,000 multiaxle 10-ton trucks/year. 75% of the equipment and
technology is from the U.S.; 25% is Italian and European,
including European subsidiaries of U.S. companies.
American taxpayers underwrote the Kama River financing through
the Export/Import Bank. Chase Manhattan (Rockefeller was the
lead financier. It was built by the Pullman - Swindell Co. (a
subsidiary of M.W. Kellogg Co.) of Pittsburgh;
7) The Volgograd automobile plant, built 1968-1971, has a
capacity of 600,000 vehicles/year. Three-fourths of the
equipment were U.S. manufacture, including key transfer lines
and automated tools. The construction contract was awarded to
Fiat S.P.A., a firm closely associated with the Chase Manhattan
8) The 647 mile highway which connects the U.S.S.R. with
Kabul, Afghanistan was under construction in 1966, built with
Soviet money and U.S. foreign aid money. A 67 mile stretch of
road through the Salang Pass cost $42 million, prompting a U.S.
engineer to say it was the costliest section of road he had ever
seen. This highway felt the rumble of Soviet tanks, heavy
trucks, and military vehicles (many produced with American
equipment and money) in December, 1979 when the Soviets invaded
Afghanistan. The results - over one million casualties.
Suttonís book is extremely
Richard F. Starr, a former U.S. Ambassador, has said that the former
Soviet Union has stored at least 362 million metric tons of grain
(much of it from the West), in fallout shelters. These supplies,
according to University of N. Carolina economist Steven Rosefield,
could feed the entire population of the former U.S.S.R. for 3-4
In addition, there are reserves in 87 cities throughout the U.S.S.R.
giving them total reserves in excess of 5 years. By contrast, the
U.S. has 30-45 days of reserves. These Soviet reserves, given to
them by the U.S. through credits with deferred payments, are being
paid for by the U.S. taxpayer.
Senator Malcom Wallop (R-Wy.) pointed out that Soviet indebtedness
is estimated to be at least $100 billion and that Western loans to
Soviet banks located in the West are not included in that figure;
80% of these loans are "untied", not restricted to any program or
project. As of 1990, $700 million a month were being loaned to the
In the meantime, the U.S. has spent billions in defense budgets to
protect us from those who are recipients of not only loans and
credits, but our technology as well!
(Best Enemy Money Can Buy contains Appendix F: "U.S. firms trading
with the Soviet Union in the 1960-1986 period, pages 231-235).
David Funderburk, a former Ambassador to Romania under the Reagan
Administration, stepped down from his post in protest of U.S. policy
toward Communist Romania and Eastern Europe. In his book, Betrayal
of America, he documents the collaboration between the leadership
elite of the State Department and the Communist countries:
"...weíre propping up Communist
regimes which are bankrupt and would fall without our aid...aid
from the U.S. government, from big business, and from big banks
(Betrayal of America by David B.
Funderburk, former U.S. Ambassador to Romania, 1991, Dist. by
Betrayal of America, P.O. Box 1124, Dur.n, N. Carolina 28334).
In his book, Reminiscences, John D.
Rockefeller informs us:
"One of our greatest helpers has
been the State Department in Washington. Our ambassadors, and
ministers, and consuls have aided to push our way into new
markets to the utmost corners of the world."
Is it any wonder? The CFR has dominated
the State Department since WWII.
Why donít we hear about these things from the media? At the 1991
Bilderbergers" (European-based globalists) meeting in Baden Baden,
Germany, the opening speaker was David Rockefeller. He said this:
"We are grateful to the Washington
Post, the New York Times, Time magazine, and other publications
whose directors have attended our meetings, and respected their
promises of discretion for almost 40 years...It would have been
impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had
been subject to the bright lights of publicity during these
Who was among the invited guests? Bill
Clinton and Dan Quayle. Among the communication corporations
represented in the CFR/Tri Lat are these:
6. Washington Post
7. New York Times Co.
8. Wall Street Journal
10. U.S. News and World Report
11. Time, Inc
12. Associated Press and Reuters (both of which local
papers rely upon)
CFR members who are TV news
1. Dan Rather
2. Tom Brokaw
3. David Brinkley
4. John Chancellor
5. Barbara Walters
6. Diane Sawyer
7. Robert NcNeil
8. Jim Lehrer
9. Daniel Schorr
David Brinkley (CFR), to a meeting of
the American TV/Radio Broadcasters Association, said this of the
"All they know about public policy is what we tell them."
Sadly enough - true.
Public ignorance and apathy are allies
of the globalists, and only recently have we heard the brazen call
for a New World Order. Yet this phrase is nothing new - It has been
on the back of a one dollar bill since 1935. Under the pyramids the
Latin phrase "Novus Ordo Seclorum", which means a "new secular order
of the age;" in other words, a new world order without
The conspirators are confident of bringing in a one-world
government, which includes plans to scrap our Constitution. They
have been quietly acquiring the necessary 34 statesí approval to
call up a Constitution Convention (ConCon) in an effort to install a
new constitution. ("New States of America" from "The Emerging
Constitution", by Rexford G. Tugwell, 1974). It is
already written, and has been largely promoted by a group called the
"Committee on a Constitutional System" (C.C.S). 19 of its 51-member
board of directors are also members of the CFR. C. Douglas Dill CFR,
former Sec. Treasury) said: "Such a significant shift in our
Constitution is unlikely to come about except as a result of a
crisis that is very grave indeed."
A financial crisis today would further their goals just as it did in
Will the new "deficit reduction bill" help the country or hasten a
crisis? The majority of the billís spending cuts will not take place
until the Presidentís term is over; in the meantime, over $800
million interest each and every day will be added to the debt.
Will a balanced budget amendment (BBA) reign in spending? Every BBA
proposal in Washington today would allow Congress to override any
such amendment by a 60% vote. If Congress was sincere, a simple
majority vote in the House (218) and the Senate (51) would balance
the budget. Remember, the country is still bankrupt; Furthermore,
the Secretary of the Treasury is also the Governor of the
International Monetary Fund (IMF). This is an alien/foreign
financial institution (22 U.S.C.A. 286).
What does this mean? Look on the back of any returned check you
mailed to the IRS for federal taxes since 1976: you will find that
it has been endorsed by a Federal Reserve Bank.
Who owns the Fed? Your tax payment was allowed to go right out of
the country! The definition of the national debt means all
obligations owed by the Treasury Department to its creditors - i.e.,
the international bankers.
The real motive behind a balanced budget amendment is not to reign
in spending, but to adopt a new Constitution. How close are they?
They have 32 of the required 34. The American public got duped into
the Federal Reserve Act and the 16th Amendment. Would it be any
A number of things could precipitate a crisis, and like in 1929,
could bring about a run on the banks. The President could invoke
"Emergency Banking Regulation No. 1", which would restrict your
right to withdraw on your bank account, and "...prohibit withdrawals
of cash in any case...that such withdrawal is sought for the purpose
The following Executive Orders were combined by Richard Nixon into
E.O. No. 11490, which activates all of the following under national
EO 10995 provides for the
control of the communications media
EO 10997 provides for the
control of the power, fuels, and minerals
EO 10998 provides for the
control of all food and farms
EO 10999 provides for the
control of all transportation, highways, etc.
EO 11000 provides for the
mobilization of all civilians into work brigades under
EO 11001 provides for control of
all health, education, and welfare
EO 11002 designates the
postmaster to operate a national registration of all persons
EO 11003 provides for control of
all airports and aircraft
EO 11004 provides for relocation
of any populations
EO 11005 provides for control of
railroads, waterways, and public storage facilities
A one-world government would require a
world law, a world court, and for enforcement, a world army. You can
understand why our Constitution must be scrapped, because Article 1,
Section 8, clauses 13-16 gives Congress exclusive power over our
armed forces. The sovereignty of our nation depends upon its ability
to defend itself. Period.
What provisions would place our armed forces under a one-world
In Volume 9, of the 25 Volume set of the 1982 United States Code, on
pages 554-558, you will find Public Law 87-297, which calls for the
disarmament of the U.S. This has been in force since 1961.
This is further explained in "The Blueprint for Peace Race" as
"Publication No. 4, General Series 3" published by the U.S. Arms
Control and Disarmament Agency, May, 1962. An abridged version of
this is State Department Document 7277. (Department of State,
Disarmament Series 5, released September 1961, office of Public
Services, Bureau of Public Affairs, U.S. Government Printing office,
The armed forces of this country are to be, in three stages, placed
under the U.N. Undersecretary for Political and Security Council
Affairs. This position has always overseen all U.N. military
operations since 1946 - it has also been held by a Soviet this
entire time (except 1954-1957, held by a communist from Yugoslavia).
At the present, our troops in Somalia serve under Turkish General
Bir, who answers to Russian U.N. Undersecretary Vladimir Petrovsky.
The American public is being warmed up to the idea of U.S. troops
serving a foreign flag, under the auspices of "humanitarian
Furthermore, the disarmament plan has provisions to permanently
station foreign U.N. troops in our closed military bases, for
"training". Of course, the media will tell us how much this will
help the local economies.
At the end of stage 1 (of 3 stages), one half of our armed forces
are to be placed under U.N. control, and all citizen-owned guns
banned, hence the myth that gun control is crime control. What they
donít say is that, under a world government, all populations must be
disarmed. In this country, names would be collected from
registration forms required by the 1968 Gun Control Act (which is
patterned from the 1938 Nazi "Law on Weapons").
Why would the military leadership of this country, sworn to defend
it, allow the armed forces to be placed under a U.N. flag?
CFR members, Defense Department
1. Sec. Defense Les Aspin
2. Undersec. for Policy Frank G. Wisner II
3. Asst. Sec. Internatíl Security Affairs Henry S. Rowen
4. Deputy Asst. Sec. Nuclear Fcs./Arms Control Frank C.
5. Deputy Asst. Sec. Europe and NATO W. Bruce Weinrod
6. Chmn. Defense Policy Bd. Adm. Seymour Weiss
7. Sec. Army Michael P.W. Stone
8. Sec. Air Force Donald B. Rice CFR members, Joint
Chiefs of Staff
1. Chairman Gen. Colin
2. Army Gen. Carl E. Vuono
3. CO Pac AF Gen. Merrill A. McPeak
4. Dir. Strat. Plans/Policy Lt. Gen. George L.
5. Com., Air Univ Lt. Gen. Charles T. Boyd
6. AF Inspector Gen. Lt. Gen. Bradley C. Hosmer
CFR members, past Sec. of Defense CFR
members, past Allied Supreme Commanders
1. 1957-59 McElroy 1949-52
2. 1959-61 Gates 1952-53 Ridgeway
3. 1961-63 McNamara 1953-56 Gruenther
4. 1969-73 Laird 1956-63 Norstad
5. 1973 Richardson 1963-69 Lemnitzer
6. 1975-77 Rumsfeld 1969-74 Goodpaster
7. 1977-81 Brown 1974-79 Haig
8. 1981-87 Weinberger 1979-87 Rogers
9. 1987-89 Carlucci
10. 1989-93 Cheney
11. 1993- Aspin
There are, however, many in our armed
forces who are patriotic to this nation. Pray for them.
As James Madison warned, there has been a: "silent and gradual
encroachment of those in power".
We are on the verge of "global tyranny", as Jasper so aptly states.
We are a Constitutional Republic, steeped in Christian heritage and
guaranteed certain God-given inalienable rights. I will repeat this
again: we have God-given rights - we are accountable to Him for
everything, including our liberty and freedom.
Our rights carry responsibilities. To dismiss those responsibilities
is a sin of omission, no different than a sin of commission - God
Over 957,000 patriotic Americans have given their lives in defense
of our country. Their legacy is the freedom and liberty we now have.
We are their posterity. Donít let their sacrifice become in vain.
Although we are not on the battlefields of France, or an atoll in
the Pacific, or a hill in Korea, or a jungle in Vietnam, or even a
desert in Saudi Arabia, we are indeed engaged in a battle.
That battlefield is in America. A war is being waged against God,
country, and family. Why? We are not only the last bastion of
freedom, but 85% of the Great Commission (Mt. 28:19, 20) emanates
If you live by the world system, you
will be subjugated by the same.
Alexis De Tocqueville, in 1840, made
the following observation after his visit in America:
"I sought for the key to the
greatness and genius of America in her harbors...; in her
fertile fields and boundless forests; in her rich mines and vast
world commerce; in her public school system and institutions of
higher learning. I sought for it in her democratic Congress and
in her matchless Constitution. Not until I went into the
churches of America and heard her pulpits flame with
righteousness did I understand the secret of her genius and
power. America is great because America is good, and if America
ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great."
What is the alternative?
A New World
Order, which will make us, as Paul warns, "slaves of men".