by Dan Johnson
November 8, 2009

from CheckTheEvidence Website

Obviously, ET contact, in full public view vs. the public "disclosure" that aliens have been watching human behavior for a LONG time - are two very different things.


Of course, disclosing the presence of ET visitors would be an interesting development, assuming the event was real and not some contrived hoax. But let's face it, what do we know about ET's?


For example, what do they think - if anything - about our controllers organized criminal behavior?


Before I go on here it might be useful to state part of Abraham Lincoln's last sentence in his Gettysburg Address:

"...that the nation, shall have a new birth of freedom, and the government of the people by the people for the people, shall not perish from the Earth."

November 19, 1863

Note that Lincoln's words might not only imply that freedom was under attack (probably always was) but that it could perish from the Earth!


Perhaps not a surprise either, as historically speaking, freedom had yet to be very well established. Today, many people will tell us freedom has already perished. Considering the events following 9/11, many consider it a done deal. Who will fight to restore all that has been taken away?

On April 27, 1863, six months before Lincoln's address, a Dr. Wolf, at the Zurich Observatory reported seeing a large number of shining disks coming from the east. He reports that some had tails and others were star shaped (1).


Unknown to many, the nineteenth century reporting of mysterious flying objects, many reported as today, were seen in the time that Lincoln was in Washington. It is likely that Lincoln would have been briefed or had knowledge of these reports, as President, in my opinion.


Did Lincoln have any concerns that freedom could also perish from Earth by intervention from elsewhere? It has been suggested that if aliens really cared that we are trashing the planet's environment, why don't they stop us?


This question was actually brought up by the late John Mack, author of the well known book 'Abduction'.


It has also been suggested, by some, that if aliens really wanted to destroy us or openly take over, they could have done so a long time ago. Since we apparently haven't experienced any significant open help or hostility, perhaps we should be considering if some ET's could be operating from a covert place - not to help or free us from our economic bondage - but to allow the attacks against freedom to continue?


Some might say this is all nonsense and what has been invading our air spaces is something other than off planet intelligences. However, based on what we know, this is a very unlikely proposition.

Recently it has been suggested,

  • That ET disclosure could be "imminent". Perhaps by the end of December, 2009.

  • That there are secret agreements in the works, regarding an "openness policy" towards ET disclosure. (But only if UFO's continue to invade our air space!)

  • That most of these ET's - but not all - are friendly.

  • That President Obama's Nobel Peace Prize makes him now more "poised" for disclosure. (Hopefully the friendly ET's will be rejoicing!)

  • That "some form" of disclosure by Obama is imminent (2).

I don't know about you, but I have a real hard time visualizing the President making this speech. But who knows, maybe when he accepts his Nobel Peace Prize in December, he will lay it on us.

Ever wonder how many people would actually want open contact with aliens?


I even wonder if I could be open to physical, eye to eye contact, with (hopefully) friendly ET's. (But this could be interesting, if one had the courage, to ask how high up are we on their agenda list! Could we bear to hear the answer?)


Others might say... if a contact event didn't come along with a great hope and commitment for ending our controllers endless economic use and abuse, what would be the point? (Not to mention their endless wars that continue to sabotage our collective prosperity.)


I don't know... maybe we should be seeking a friendly ET contact event since it might be impossible for us to ever break away from our controller's economic stranglehold.


I mean,

  • Are we actually collectively smart enough to end this abuse on our own? We keep getting promises of change, but nothing seems to ever change. History seems to keep repeating itself with humanity getting the short end of the stick every time.

  • Could we accept a world with ET gods calling the "shots"?

  • Or, is that the problem, they have always been calling the major shots - in secrecy?

Many of us have realized that our world leaders are now in serious damage control mode of operation. They know, that we know, they are responsible for allowing the looting of the world economy.


Of course they are hoping the people will forget about their crimes after they re-inflate their phony economic system - at our expense, again.


And, we have all witnessed the many ways our controllers have been trying to "help" us with the likes of global warming money scams, corporate take over's, trillions of dollars in "bankster" bailouts and finally, empty promises to end wars and the murder of millions innocent people which always goes along with these wars.


Problem is... a lot more people are not buying this stuff anymore.


So, if they fail to re-inflate the world economy, and the "natives" get REALLY restless, they might want to disclose that there are some unfriendly ET's out there. Thus, the imminent disclosure of friendly aliens, all things (economically) considered, might be a stretch at the present point of desperation.

But for me, as I have implied before, the best disclosure would be the release of secret physics/technology (3). The kind that would allow humanity access to ultra advanced propulsion and energy systems.


We know this stuff is out there because many of us have witnessed it invading our air spaces!


  1. See chapter 2, Flying Saucers Have Landed, by Leslie and Adamski, 1956.

  2. Official Disclosure of Extraterrestrial Life Is Imminent

  3. Is ET Disclosure More Important Than Exposing Our Physics Truth Embargo? (below report)





Is ET Disclosure More Important Than Exposing Our...

"Physics Truth Embargo"?
by Dan Johnson
August 24, 2009

from CheckTheEvidence Website

Probably the primary goal of many in Ufology and Exopolitics is to gain enough political power to bring about the full disclosure that Extraterrestrial races have been and still are active in monitoring our species.


Such a goal is certainly worthy of great interest but its "pre-occupation", in my opinion, tends to somewhat overlook a far more serious concern. This concern is what I will refer to here as a Physics Truth Embargo. The hope that disclosure will help in releasing covered up technology is not a new one, but what I will be discussing here is even more disturbing if that's possible.


So, in pursuing this line of thought I would like to speculate, some, about the concept that aliens are not only monitoring us (the UFO aspect) but are also actively interacting with some of us (the exopolitics aspect of so-called secret agreements) by asking some rather provocative questions.


For example:

  • Is it really reasonable to think that some alien races actually make secret technological agreements with us as proposed by some exopolitics researchers?

  • Secret agreements with who?

  • Secret agreements with governments that have allowed corrupt military and intelligence agencies to dominate them?

  • World governments that have been complicit in looting much of the global economy?

  • Governments, whose agents, along with their news media, would cover up the truth about destructive operations like 9/11?

  • Governments that, through contrived foreign policies, continue in their endless wars and endless meddling in the affairs of other nations?

  • Governments who would hide advanced physics/technology - the kind that is required for advanced propulsion and free energy systems?

  • Does it really make any sense that advanced aliens, aliens who could probably read anyone's thoughts, would make agreements with such governments?

(Note: Obviously, such advanced technology, which we know must be out there, could be a tremendous boost for our struggling race. Why would our leaders not share such knowledge with the public sector?)

I view these questions as extremely profound, considering that we are dealing with real gatekeepers, not only below, but apparently high above if such technology agreements were indeed real. For example, what if the only advanced technology that is allowed to filter down from such agreements are only meant to enhance the continued economic use and abuse of human race?


As I have mentioned to some people before, apparently any useful experimental input for theoretical particle physics ended over 20 years ago.


How is that?


Well, in an April 1988 Physics Today article, 'Flavor SU(3) Symmetries in Particle Physics', physicist Howard Georgi laments that the "healthy situation" of required experimental input "has changed in recent years". (Really?)


Twenty years later, we find the same concern stated by Peter Woit in his 2006 book, 'Not Even Wrong: The failure of string theory and the search for unity in physical law'.


(Note: Many physicists think string theory is a waste of time and money. I think it may be something even worse - like a distraction to mislead the public that we are getting honest science.)


In his book, Woit also laments the "lack of useful" experimental input and states the traditional system is now "seriously dysfunctional".

  • Could we be talking about a physics truth embargo here anybody?

  • But why?

  • Do we really need to question what kind of black hole really useful high energy experimental work might have gone into?

  • Or, were there certain secret low energy experimental breakthroughs in the 80's which eliminated the need for expensive, high energy experimental programs? (Recall the cancellation of the Superconducting Super Collider.)

The shutting down of cold fusion research, which was generating interesting experimental input, was and still is highly suspicious.


I realize this might disturb some, but I seriously doubt if the Large Hadron Collider will produce any useful science - like the kind needed for advanced propulsion and free energy systems.


Unfortunately, I think it is quite likely that we are not dealing with a full deck of cards here and our controllers have no intentions of ever showing us the missing cards. Unfortunately, few understand how and why mainstream science can shut down some interesting science research.

  • Could it be that it threatens to reveal certain forbidden physical knowledge? (see reading suggestions reference below)

  • So, in this regard, might we be asking at whose "mercy", is the human race standing?

  • Establishment controlled governments?

  • Aliens?

  • Both?

  • So in vain, does the traditional system putter in futility with endless complex math - while an entrenched physics truth embargo keeps all ultra advanced physics/technology from humanity? (I can say with certainty that there are people out there - a lot smarter than I - who think so. See the link below for: M is for Messy.)

Someone I know, about ten years ago, made a suggestion.


It was:


This is of course quite profound as we are only free, I think, in the sense of how much truth we personally find. (And it's been increasingly clear lately that our controllers don't want us to find too much truth about anything!)

  • Can we ever hope to be truly free if certain science truths are hidden from humanity?

  • Is this the ultimate "stranglehold"?

  • A physics truth embargo stranglehold?

  • What if disclosure doesn't relieve the stranglehold?

  • Would it really be all that meaningful?

True, disclosure of the 60+ year old, worldwide cover up of an alien presence, assuming the disclosure is not some contrived hoax, would be very important.


But would it be huge if the aliens still maintain their distance?


In fact, it might be quite anti-climatic for some if it turns out the aliens have the final say as to when, if ever, the public sector of this world sees ultra advanced propulsion and free energy physics and the associated technology.

Reading suggestions

  • M is for Messy, by Martin Gardner

    (A very interesting review of two books, The Trouble With Physics, by Lee Smolin and Not Even Wrong, by Peter Woit. This review pulls together a lot of similar views related to my essay)

  • The Electric Charge and Magnetization Distribution of The Nucleon - Evidence of a Subatomic Turing Wave Pattern - by Paul A. LaViolette Ph.D. February 22, 2008

    (Note: Thanks to Dr Paul LaViolette, I can now "let go" of the quark "bag" model and "cling" to his Turing Wave model of nucleons. This is not easy to do for many, even those who are strong critics of string theory. But for me, because of the fundamental wave nature of particles, the Turing Wave Theory seems to make the most logical description of what we observe in nature, in my opinion, at this point in time.)