by Richard C. Cook
May 12, 2024
from GlobalResearch Website



With all the trouble in today's world, including,

  • the completely pointless American-instigated war in Ukraine

  • Israel's loathsome genocidal onslaught against the Palestinians in Gaza

  • militant U.S. threats to China over Taiwan,

...perhaps we should be asking whether the escalation in tensions threatening massive global conflict is really a carefully-crafted Globalist "false-flag" concealing something even more sinister.

Particularly dominating the news cycle are the battles now raging in the U.S. and elsewhere between activists and authorities via pro-Palestinian demonstrations.

But again, is it more contrived distraction...?

I believe it is.

What then is the real agenda behind these headline-dominating events?


What are the Globalists, who are the real string-pullers, actually trying to achieve?


Will more conventional wars and street-level conflict really do the job?



Actual Human Deaths from War

To narrow our focus, the world has not seen a major war since World War II took place in 1939-1945, with over 16 million military fatalities and an estimated 70-85 million overall casualties, including civilians.


Given a world population of 2.3 billion in 1940, war casualties were thus about 3.7 percent of that total.

Granted the horrific nature of wartime deaths, 3.7 percent remains a relatively low figure, with the concentration of deaths obviously affecting some nations much more than others. In World War II the hardest hit were the Soviet Union and Germany.


But the total loss was scarcely a bump in the road of long-term growth of the world's human population, today reaching 8.1 billion and counting.


Looking at more contemporary data, deaths attributed to all wars since 9/11, a period often referred to as one of "endless war," are about 4.5-4.7 million.


This figure, however, yields vastly smaller proportions than those of World War II.


Thus the net demographic effect of war over the past two-plus decades is scarcely noticeable, though again, any casualties are horrific to those affected.

Additionally, war casualties, including civilians, are nowadays produced by highly focused conflicts within limited areas.


These conflicts often involve countries where the West covets their resources.

Thus West Asia, with its vast hydrocarbon and mineral reserves, has posed a tempting target, leading to U.S./U.K. assaults against Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya.


Similar, though less visible assaults, have taken place in Africa.

More recently, the U.S. proxy war against Russia in Ukraine has led to depopulation of that country through emigration and battlefield losses, even as U.S. corporations like BlackRock have made investments in land and minerals.


The U.S.-supported genocide by Israel against Palestinians in Gaza has also been suspected of having as a motivation a takeover of offshore oil and gas reserves.

Still, we might say that weighed in the balance against the incredible potential for casualties resulting from the enormous firepower of the world's conventional and nuclear arsenals, total wartime deaths today remain relatively limited.


And even if these arsenals were put to far greater use than they have been in recent conflicts,

would the totality of the world's population be seriously reduced by such an outbreak before the impulse to all-out war had spent itself?

Are we certain, for instance, that the much-feared World War III, would really result in obliteration of life on earth, as many speculate, or would that too be just another speed bump?

We really don't know...


Plus there are many more safeguards and restraints within the international community than existed in 1941 which could be activated, including procedures in place through the much-maligned United Nations.

We are also seeing that the West's military arsenals are useless except on hapless opponents, as shown by the failure of Western arms in Ukraine, where they have proven to be overly-complex, expensive, and vulnerable.


Their main purposes today seem to be, increasingly,

  • "job creation"

  • enrichment of the stockholders in the arms manufacturing sector

  • providing some kind of phantom "deterrence" against "aggression"

  • entertainment for politicians, the mainstream media, and voters...

As horrible as war is, the Globalists are certainly looking beyond overt warfare to accomplish their ends, which many believe center on, or at least include, bioweapons in order to accomplish wholesale human population reduction.


In fact, the U.S. military and the CIA have been covertly creating and utilizing bioweapons for decades, as documented on Tucker Carlson Uncensored in a recent episode entitled "Was Lyme Disease Created as a Bioweapon?"

Though not covered in this article, space weaponry is another area where war fantasists have been hoping for decades to make breakthroughs in doomsday weapons that would cause enemies to surrender without a fight or that would wipe an adversary off the map in an unanswerable first-strike.

But let's move on.




The Depopulation Lobby

While it seeks to conceal itself, the existence of a powerful lobby in favor of wholesale planetary population reduction can be discerned.

For a couple of centuries, doomsayers like English minister Thomas Malthus (1766-1834) have been shouting that sooner rather than later population growth would outstrip the capacity of earth's resources to support such expanding human numbers.

Of course, Malthus was wrong, largely due to the ability of the Industrial Revolution to provide sustenance for a growing population and engender large improvements in sanitation, nutrition, agricultural productivity, and medical treatments to keep more people alive for longer lifespans.


Particularly impactful have been the reduction in infant mortality and improvements in family and childhood welfare.

But for a certain class of people closely identified with the Globalists these changes have not been a cause for rejoicing, but rather a premonition of impending doom.


These sentiments have merged with the "eugenics" movement which sees population growth as largely an increase in the numbers of people they do not like and do not want to be alive.

For this particular class, the potential of war to reduce the population has not seemed to have panned out for the reasons disclosed by the considerations presented above.


Other, more effective, methods have therefore been sought. Bioweapons, viewed as relatively easy to inflict by covert means and difficult to trace to their sources, have moved to the forefront.


Who, then, may be behind it all?

In his article from July 30, 2023, "Billionaires Try to Shrink World's Population: Secret Gathering Sponsored by Bill Gates, 2009 Meeting of 'The Good Club'," Global Research head Dr. Michel Chossudovsky asked,

"Is Worldwide Depopulation Part of the Billionaires' Great Reset?"

Dr. Chossudovsky writes:

For more than ten years, meetings have been held by billionaires described as philanthropists to reduce the size of the world's population culminating with the 2020-2022 COVID crisis.

Recent developments suggest that "Depopulation" is an integral part of the so-called COVID mandates, including the lockdown policies and the mRNA vaccine.

According to the Wall Street Journal:

"In May 2009, the billionaire philanthropists met behind closed doors at the home of the president of the Rockefeller University in Manhattan.


This secret gathering was sponsored by Bill Gates. They called themselves 'The Good Club.'


Among the participants were the late David Rockefeller, Warren Buffett, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey, and many more."

In May 2009, the WSJ as well as the Sunday Times reported (John Harlow, Los Angeles) that,

"Some of America's leading billionaires have met secretly to consider how their wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world's population and speed up improvements in health and education."

The emphasis was not on population growth (i.e. Planned Parenthood) but on "Depopulation" i.e., the reduction in the absolute size of the world's population.




To read complete WSJ article click here.


According to the Sunday Times report...:

The philanthropists who attended a summit convened on the initiative of Bill Gates, the Microsoft co-founder, discussed joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles to change.

Dr. Chossudovsky's article may be accessed here and is cited in my own book, Our Country, Then and Now. 


It's no secret that eugenics and population control have long been a goal of the Globalists in general and the Rockefeller family and Bill Gates in particular.


With the "Good Club," we have Gates and David Rockefeller in the same series of meetings, along with several other famous billionaires.


Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s recent book, The Real Anthony Fauci - Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, cites multiple examples where the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has promoted large-scale vaccine utilization in Africa with the likely underlying motive of population reduction.


In Europe, the Club of Rome and its offshoots, including the World Economic Forum (WEF), have lobbied for similar objectives. 


As far as raw numbers are concerned, "Good Club" member and founder of CNN Ted Turner famously said,

"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95 percent decline from present levels, would be ideal" - as quoted in the McAlvany Intelligence Advisor, June 1996.

It's appropriate here to mention Aurelio Peccei, co-founder of Club of Rome, originator of the idea for the World Economic Forum  (WEF), and his justification for the need for supra-national institutions to address global crises.


This involves the implicit necessity to weaken the sovereignty of nation states in order for Globalism to succeed.


It's from this angle that the destruction of the U.S. producing economy has been undertaken through industrial outsourcing and was achieved in the decades following publication of Peccei's seminal volume, The Chasm Ahead.   


The relationship between the Rockefellers and Peccei dates to April 11, 1964, when Peccei attended a meeting of the Bilderberger Group in Williamsburg, Virginia, where he met with David Rockefeller, by then president and chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank.


Rockefeller was also the overseer for the Council on Foreign Relations, the principal U.S. Globalist think-tank.  I read about this meeting between Rockefeller and Peccei decades after the fact.


It had a particular interest for me, because I was there! Not in their meeting, of course, but at the Williamsburg Lodge where the conference was being held.


I was with the local high school current events club at the time, and we had been invited to listen to a couple of speeches. During my lifetime and career as a government analyst, I have been witness to many events of historical significance.


Just think, I was also hanging around near what may have been the laying of plans to destroy much of the human race...!





By the mid-1970s, promotion of population reduction was official U.S. government policy


As documented by the Human Life International website (January 3, 2024):

The United States National Security Council is the highest decision-making body regarding foreign policy in the United States.


On December 10, 1974, it completed a top-secret document entitled National Security Study Memorandum or NSSM-200, also called The Kissinger Report, since Henry Kissinger was Secretary of State at the time it was written.


The subject of NSSM-200 is "Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests."


This document, published shortly after the first major international population conference in Bucharest, was the result of collaboration among,

  • the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)

  • the United States Agency for International Development (USAID)

  • the Departments of State, Defense and Agriculture

NSSM-200 was made public when it was declassified and was transferred to the U.S. National Archives in 1990.

The report stated:

The U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less developed countries.


That fact gives the U.S. enhanced interest in the political, economic, and social stability of the supplying countries.


Wherever a lessening of population pressures through reduced birth rates can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resource supplies and to the economic interests of the United States.

Note that Henry Kissinger was a lifetime associate of the Rockefeller financial empire and was even considered at one point as being named overall coordinator of all Rockefeller investments. 





It can also be argued that the U.S. has been trying for decades to engineer limitations on nation-state sovereignty and population growth in less developed countries through the International Monetary Fund (IMF), with its host of "conditionalities" accompanying its predatory lending policies.


These have included,

  • privatizing public utilities

  • cutting pay for public employees

  • reduction of welfare benefits

  • conversion of agricultural production away from self-sufficiency to export commodities

  • voting the "correct" way at the UN

  • opening their economies to Western capital investment at high interest rates, etc.

U.S. sanctions have also played a part, one example being sanctions against Iraq during the mid-1990s that Secretary of State Madeleine Albright admitted were the cause of death of 500,000 Iraqi children...

"It was worth it," she told a TV interviewer.

Sanctions against Russia over the war in Ukraine doubtless have the same intent as part of a similar resource grab against Russia the U.S. carried out after the fall of the Soviet Union in the 1990s.

Now, however, it can be argued that the tactics of Globalist population reduction rendered against less-developed/adversarial but often resource-rich parts of the world are being intentionally turned against Western nations' own populations and are not simply the consequences of multiple policy decisions made without an underlying agenda.


Within the U.S. we have seen the rapid and radical increase in wealth disparity between rich and poor and the weakening of the social safety net by such actions as cutting food stamps and Medicaid benefits.


Only a blind man could not have known these measures would cause poverty and mortality to increase among the lower income sector.

Due to inflation, caused at least in part by corporate profiteering, the availability of housing, food, education, and transportation are increasingly out of reach, with the high cost of living promoting smaller families.


Abortions-on-demand as a birth control measure have long been part of the liberal program with medically-assisted suicide becoming common with the distribution of morphine by hospices.


Promotion of the LBGT agenda also results in the begetting of fewer children.

But a major milestone in the assault by the developed world against humanity may have been reached with the COVID pandemic.


Again, it was Robert F. Kennedy Jr. who has amassed the details about the manner in which,

the societal lockdowns, business closures, shuttering of schools, and censorship of dissent,

...had been anticipated by two decades of below-the-radar training and planning exercises, with heavy military participation.


One of these, "Event 201," took place immediately before the start of the COVID pandemic at Johns Hopkins University, sponsored by Bill Gates and the World Economic Forum (WEF).

In his latest book, The Wuhan Cover-Up and the Terrifying Bioweapons Arm Race, RFK Jr. discusses the massive proliferation of U.S.-sponsored bioweapons labs worldwide that are conducting research on the weaponization of viruses under the heading of "


It has only been in the last couple of years that "gain-of-function" has become a phrase of common parlance.

It almost seems as though the elite controllers of Western society have decided that open warfare is insufficient to reach their depopulation goals, so that a different solution must be sought.


What they appear to have lighted upon is the deliberate inculcation of pandemics. COVID, including the deadly mRNA "vax," was possibly their dry-run.

Of course, COVID was not the first medical atrocity committed by Big Pharma, the U.S. government, and the medical profession.


Another is the epidemic of autism likely caused by the proliferation of vaccinations inflicted on children.


According to Dr. Lewis Coleman of the American Geopolitical Institute:

We never saw this when we were in elementary school, but now it's an epidemic, not to mention all the myriad damage caused by Long COVID and other "vaccination" effects.


One shudders to consider what society will look like 20 years from now. Children with these maladies can destroy families and divert attention from the needs of healthy children.


And this doesn't count all the miscarriages and Long COVID victims and sudden death victims of the mRNA injections, or the countless patients crippled by chronic illnesses such as Parkinson's Disease that are caused by pollution of our food, water, and air.


By Hildenbrand / MSC,

Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0





The Globalists' Worldwide Depopulation Agenda Outgrows Its Training Wheels

In the meantime, the Globalists have been taking action in the spheres of economics and technology to prepare the ground for a massive crash in the world's population.


One of these actions has been the out-of-proportion "Climate Change" scare and supposed conversion to renewable energy sources that would leave advanced industrial nations dependent on solar panels and windmills...


The best example is the destruction being wrought on the German economy by the Green Party which has already succeeded in shuttering all Germany's nuclear plants.

Another point of attack has been centralization and digitization of currencies.


Another has been promotion of artificial intelligence in industrial processes, though the Globalists have not disclosed who will purchase all the goods produced by unending automation if the consuming public has been "disappeared."


Yet another ruse has been centralization of food production with an ever-shrinking number of companies responsible for the food supply.

This has included conjuring up threats to the food supply through what might be called "biological terrorism," like the growing hysteria over "bird flu" with actions like Michigan Governor Gretchen Witmer's threats of a military-style crackdown that could result in more of the already-alarming mass culling of poultry and cattle.


In fact, "bird flu" may be the mysterious "Disease X" that some are now warning about.

A May 6, 2024, article by Julian Rose in the Activist Post entitled "Madkind-v-Mankind - A Race Against Time" gives a graphic description of the future the controllers have envisioned:

"The Great Reset" is the appropriately named most recent clock setting event initiated by Madkind.

It has placed some key dates in its agenda for the transference of organic life into a digitally controlled robotic look-alike, with the purpose of rendering Mankind obsolete.

It finds 2025/26, 2030 and 2045/50 useful markers by which to achieve particular phases of this ambition.

We know Madkind's game plan because it is explicitly laid out in UN Agenda 2030 and the World Economic Forum's Fourth Industrial Revolution/Green New Deal.

On the financial side, for a start, a central bank digital currency with a social credit compliance program to control individual's access to their bank accounts, is clocked in for circa 2026.

Global economic stagnation and swathes of human starvation are timed to follow.

By 2030, Madkind's agenda states that the process of digitalization and artificial intelligence (AI) will have usurped much of Mankind's emotional and rational thinking capacity; with natural powers of reproduction also sterilized into submission by ever increasing atmospheric geoengineering, water and food denaturing, electromagnetic frequencies (EMF) and weaponised vaccination programmes.

By the same date around fifty percent of food is planned to be created in factory laboratories. Synthetic, genetically modified and with no connection with soil.

Insects are high on the list for protein replacement, once milk, meat and eggs have been rendered "off the menu" due to their being identified as complicit in Madkind's mad global warming invention.

Energy production is slated to be largely divorced from fossil fuel burning practices by this same date, replaced by what it sees as "Green' solutions taking over the powering of what is left of productive industry.

By 2045/50 Madkind sees itself in the driving seat with its so called "Net Zero" (no carbon dioxide) policy having further reduced natural biodiversity and world populations to a fraction of current levels, replacing Mankind with the AI Transhuman cyborg version and a slave race of Humankind preserved for menial duties unsuited to robots.

This is a purely cursory, indicative list – as there is far more insanity in the pipeline than mentioned here. And Madkind has a plan B, C and D if A fails to materialize (on time).

To further remind one's self, just check Mad Schwab's description of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and Mad Harari's declaration "We will do better than God."




We are most emphatically not supposed to communicate among ourselves about any of this.


Since President Joe Biden took office in 2021, the U.S. government has engaged in a major assault on free speech. As reported by the Brownstone Institute in an article entitled "Book Burning Goes Digital":

In March 2021, the Biden White House initiated a brazenly unconstitutional censorship campaign to,

prevent Americans from buying politically unfavorable books from Amazon...

The effort, spearheaded by White House censors including Andy Slavitt and Rob Flaherty, began on March 2, 2021, when Slavitt emailed Amazon demanding to speak to an executive about the site's,

"high levels of propaganda and misinformation and disinformation."

Their subsequent discussions remain unknown, but recently released emails from the House Judiciary Committee reveal that the censors achieved their intended result.


Within a week, Amazon adopted a shadow ban policy.

Company officials wrote in internal emails,

"The impetus for this request is criticism from the Biden administration about sensitive books we're giving prominent placement to, and should be handled urgently."

They further clarified that the policy was "due to criticism from the Biden people," presumably meaning Slavitt and Flaherty.

We may generalize by saying that the government's focal point for their attack on free speech has been mainly topics related to COVID, the "pandemic," vaccines, etc. Brownstone continues:

At the time, "vaccine misinformation" was parlance for inconvenient truths.


Five months after the Amazon censorship crusade, Twitter banned Alex Berenson at the Government's behest for noting that the shots do not prevent infection or transmission.


Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) favorably cited his Twitter ban in a September 2021 letter to Amazon calling for increased censorship of books.

A similar process occurred at Facebook.


Mark Zuckerberg wrote in internal emails that the platform decided to ban claims related to the lab-leak theory in February 2021 after,

"tense conversations with the new Administration."

Facebook executive Nick Clegg similarly wrote that the censorship was due to,

"pressure from the [Biden] administration and others to do more."

Another internal Facebook email from August 2021 wrote that the company had implemented,

new "misinformation" policies "stemming from the continued criticism of our approach from the [Biden] administration."

Not only does the Biden regime's call for de facto book bans lead to the suppression of true information regarding lockdowns, vaccine injuries, and the lab-leak theory; it was also a clear violation of the First Amendment.


View original article at


For a further detailed review of government and media suppression of information on the COVID pandemic, see the May 8, 2024, Substack of the heavily censored Dr. Robert Malone entitled, "Update on COVID mRNA Vaccine Harms."


Dr. Malone states: 

I have been waiting for this moment for years now.


The U.S. federal government is finally starting to acknowledge that they have forced the citizens (including military personnel) of this country to accept toxic injectable products presented as "vaccines," products which either contain or cause patients' bodies to produce a known toxin: the engineered SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.


We are now seeing an incremental rollout of limited hangouts, in which current and former senior federal officials are starting to acknowledge deaths and harms attributable to the various emergency use of authorized COVID-19 "vaccine" products.


Of course, this comes after years of official federal denialism, cover ups, withholding data, overt marketing of unlicensed medical products (to adults AND children), and a massive censorship/defamation/propaganda campaign which has spanned virtually all of both mainstream media as well as alternative media outlets.


Virtually all peer reviewed medical journals have been coopted and compromised, particularly those owned by the WEF partner publishing houses Elsevier and Springer/Nature...


Relevant to this point was the recent reveal during the Dr. Peter Daszak public testimony in the US. Congress that both the Lancet (published by Elsevier) and Nature (Springer) have refused to testify in response to specific congressional requests. 

It's a fact that the avalanche of censorship is concerned almost exclusively with the publication of true information about the COVID "pandemic"; nothing has been attacked by the government with such vehemence on any other topic. 


It follows that promotion of the false COVID narrative may be the overriding objective of the Biden administration, even above issues of war and peace, illegal immigration, human rights, or anything else.


One may even conjecture that the main purpose of the Biden presidency is to prepare the U.S. and humanity for massive worldwide depopulation.


The vehicle now appears to be the World Health Organization's Pandemic Treaty set for a vote at the WHO's upcoming World Health Assembly meeting on May 27-June 1, 2024.  





WHO Pandemic Treaty



Public health in governmental

and non-governmental perception.

(By Giovanni Maki,

Public Library of Science/Licensed

under CC BY-SA 2.5)




The WHO, an agency of the United Nations, is largely through its own assumed authority now proposing a Pandemic Treaty that has the potential to shut down the world in lockdowns vastly more severe than occurred during COVID, solely on its own say-so that a "pandemic" may be taking place.


The WHO - or whoever their "bosses" are - will be able to mandate compulsory vaccination and "vaccine passports" for every human being on the planet while suppressing all debate or dissent. 


Critics are pointing out - when they are allowed to speak - that there is absolutely no evidence that natural outbreaks of infectious diseases are anywhere close to the level implied by the totalitarian program of societal suppression the treaty would implement.


This raises the suspicion that such outbreaks could only be engineered by deliberate release of microbes generated by "gain-of-function" R&D similar to what was likely done with COVID. 


The Biden administration has declared its intent to be a party to the WHO agreement, but that it will not be providing the U.S. Senate the opportunity to ratify such a treaty as specified in the U.S. Constitution.


They claim that the treaty can be implemented by executive fiat. 


The treaty is an obvious assault on the sovereignty of any nation that chooses to take part and a threat to the sanctity of personhood of every individual. In the U.S., the Bill of Rights would virtually be suspended.


To implement the WHO's mandates, the Biden administration has created its own executive-level agency, the Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy (OPPRP).


Approved by Congress in 2023, the agency,

"leads, coordinates, and implements actions related to preparedness for, and response to, known and unknown biological threats and pathogens that could lead to a pandemic or to significant public health-related disruptions in the United States."

A bureaucratic system referred to as "One Health" is under construction as an organizing mechanism. 

Basically, One Health intends to control all facets of life:

Economics, water, public policy, occupational health risks, agriculture, global trade, commerce, environmental health, ecosystems, communications, climate change and incidentally, pandemics and human health.

("Patrick Wood explains how One Health includes everything, and that it is already embedded in our domestic agencies," Meryl's COVID Newsletter, May 8, 2024)


"Known and unknown"; "that could lead to a pandemic... " says OPPRP's charter.

An actual pandemic is not even required...


And no one says how the mandates approved by the OPPRP, possibly applying to hundreds of millions of people, will be enforced at the level of communities and individuals.


But as with COVID, such activities as family gatherings, shopping, or church services would undoubtedly be criminalized, while schools revert to the ruinous-to-learning process of cyber-instruction. 


Returning to the WHO, who are its bosses that will stand as the international arbiter of every real or possible microbial crisis?


The most powerful figure behind WHO funding is U.S. multi-billionaire Bill Gates, who, as indicated above, is today the most visible member of the Globalist hierarchy determined to reduce the earth's human population.


Will Gates and his WEF associates be the ultimate decision-makers?


As indicated earlier, COVID can likely be seen as a dry-run for the much more severe sanctions promised by the WHO's Pandemic Treaty.


How then did the WHO perform during COVID?


We may perhaps get a glimpse by examining a lawsuit recently filed in Geneva, Switzerland, location of WHO headquarters, by a group of international lawyers through an organization called the World Council for Health Steering Committee. 


The lawsuit is directed against Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the WHO.


Among the lengthy and detailed allegations against Ghebreyesus are those of,

"falsely informing world governments of a so-called pandemic, thereby causing governments to declare non-existent medical emergencies" that "have been and are still an integral part of a chain events that is resulting in mass loss of life, immense physical harm, and untold psychological distress and trauma to the people on this planet."

Dr. Ghebreyesus is not a medical doctor, by the way.

Rather he holds a Doctorate of Philosophy (PhD) in Community Health from the University of Nottingham, UK.

In fact, the UK has been heavily involved in development of the WHO treaty, with then-British Prime Minister Boris Johnson a signatory to the article proposing the treaty originally.


The text of the World Council for Health Steering Committee lawsuit continues: 

Said actions appear to have led to Governments deploying insufficiently tested SARS-CoV-2 genetically modified organisms (GMOs) falsely termed "vaccines," being also gene therapies, mandating unscientific masking protocols, implementing inhumane and anti-scientific "social distancing" measures, purchasing and deploying ineffective and fraudulent PCR tests subsequently used to create false "casedemics" in order to justify unlawful "lockdowns," business closures and house arrest.

The plaintiffs ask for this remedy on the part of Dr. Ghebreyesus:

We demand that, with immediate effect, you cease and desist from taking further actions that would involve false and fraudulent communication to governments thereby causing or resulting in further instances of the kind of catastrophic outcomes outlined above.

The lawsuit also demands personal accountability from Dr. Ghebreyesus:

We also put you on notice that failure to cease or desist from continued or repeated involvement or implication in the above harms shall render you liable both in your personal and corporate capacity.


As a man, you shall be investigated for criminal conspiracy.


As a corporate officer, you shall be investigated for gross negligence, serious misconduct in public office, corporate fraud, and potentially even aiding and abetting corporate manslaughter.

For complete information on the opposition of the World Council for Health to the WHO and its plans and programs, see their website at


Then ask yourself if the WHO should be entrusted with the future of the human race or whether the WHO treaty is a prescription for mass extinction.


Then ask whether humanity is so lacking in self-respect as to countenance this travesty? 





Opposition to the WHO


There is growing opposition to the WHO Pandemic Treaty, particularly among organizations and individuals who are leading the general societal awakening to the horrors inflicted by the world's governing authorities with respect to the COVID "pandemic"...


At the same time,

the world is only beginning to realize the harm that has already been inflicted by the mRNA "vaccines" administered to hundreds of millions of people worldwide.

Communication on these vital topics continue to be repressed by the Biden administration and other governments globally.


The urgency of the need to fight against the imposition of the WHO Pandemic Treaty has scarcely penetrated the political sphere. 


At the same time, awareness is growing...!

Within the U.S., the state of Louisiana may soon declare that it will not be subject to UN or WHO mandates.


Similar legislation has been introduced in Oklahoma.


22 state attorneys-general have said the same. 


Opposition was also recently expressed by a letter to President Biden from the 49 U.S. senators in the Republican Senate Conference.

As reported by Fox News (May 2, 2024):

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., led the entire Republican Senate conference in calling on President Biden to reject agreements that would expand the authority of the World Health Organization (WHO) in the case of a global pandemic.

"We strongly urge you not to join any pandemic related treaty, convention, or agreement being considered" at the 77th World Health Assembly,

...reads a letter sent to Biden by Johnson and all 48 other Republican senators. 


The Republican senators stressed that any such agreement would be considered a treaty, which they noted requires,

"the concurrence of two-thirds of the Senate under Article I Section 2 of the Constitution."

Sen. Ron Johnson led all GOP senators in a letter to Biden, calling on him not to support agreements to expand WHO authority. 


The World Health Assembly (WHA) will take place from May 27 to June 1, and international agreements are expected to be considered. 


The WHA is the WHO's decision-making body, which meets yearly, so it can lay out its goals and craft policies between the 194 member states. 

Due to the growing uproar, however, Great Britain, one of the original drivers, is now considering a vote against the treaty.


According to Reuters (May 9, 2024),

"We will only support the adoption of the accord and accept it on behalf of the UK, if it is firmly in the UK national interest and respects national sovereignty," a spokesperson for Britain's Department of Health and Social Care confirmed.

Also reportedly opposing the treaty is the government of The Netherlands. 





Grassroots Opposition


Among those individuals leading the opposition within the U.S. and worldwide is Dr. Meryl Nass, a physician from Maine whose license to practice medicine was suspended when she prescribed medications for COVID treatment which, while legal, were frowned upon by medical authorities as not conforming to the often-deadly government-preferred treatment protocols.


The medications in question were, of course, Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine.


Dr. Nass's Substack may be found here. Dr. Nass has recommended a series of steps for sovereign governments to take in fighting the WHO Pandemic Treaty.


See her Substack here entitled,

"What can lawmakers do to stop the Pandemic Agreement (Treaty) and amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR) from going forward at the 77th World Health Assembly (WHA) meeting, taking place from May 27 to June 1, 2024?"






For many, the Globalist attitude is on full display in the comment famously attributed to Britain's Prince Philip by The Guardian in 2009 where he is quoted as having said,

"In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation."

We have no idea what the net effect of the COVID "pandemic" has been, or will be, once the downstream nefarious side-effects of the "jab" play out in deaths, illnesses, and long-term infertility.


Without question, the mortality and morbidity, including health effects from depression, loss of livelihood, etc., are already in the hundreds of millions. 


For instance, as reported in Jeff Childers' Substack, May 8, 2024:

"In a recent World Economic Forum clip making the rounds this week, veterinarian and Moderna CEO Stéphan Bancel freely admitted that sixteen million Americans now have disabling Long Covid, which most of us interpret in proper English as 'Long Vaxx':"

I believe it is accurate to say that the harm to mankind from the COVID travesty already exceeds any single war since World War II and possibly all wars on the planet since 9/11.


And this may be just the beginning. 

Returning to the considerations that began this article, I personally believe that the Globalists have taken a significant step forward on their project for massive planetary population reduction...


But it may also be that the coming effects from the WHO Pandemic Treaty will be much, much greater than anything seen thus far. 


The proposed WHO Pandemic Treaty may therefore be,

the greatest assault on human rights, constitutional government, and the sanctity of human life in all history.


And yes, I am including in this the Holocaust. 

And in our concern about the actions of the WHO, we should not forget about the major role being played by the U.S. military establishment in funding and promoting further bioweapons development.

It was the U.S. military, after all, that funded the COVID vax...!

Further, Karen Kingston wrote in her Substack for May 7, 2024: 

Crime Pays: DARPA's $4.1 Billion Synthetic Biology Budget for 2024.


These monies are being used to invest in synthetic biology technologies that no reputable private venture capital firm will fund because the human applications of these biotechnologies are criminal.

DARPA is the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, a major funder of vaccine development.


See its website for its article on,

"Taking Guess Work out of Vaccine Development: AIM Program aims to leverage host immune mechanisms to determine if vaccine candidates will provide long-lasting immune protection."

And the U.S. military to which DARPA belongs is 100 percent under Globalist control.


This was confirmed long ago by Henry Kissinger, who famously said,

"Military Men are dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy." 

But it's not just military men.

The Globalists see all of us in a similar way; essentially as just a herd of cattle...

As I indicated at the beginning of this article, the rush of events in the news today due to the countless conflicts and crises, including the turmoil associated with the 2024 U.S. presidential election, have prevented the seriousness of the WHO's actions from being fully exposed and appreciated, not just among the political classes of the world's nations, but from the public in general. 


At the same time, with what there is of growing public and political awareness, there are increasing reports that the current version of the WHO Pandemic Treaty has no chance of being approved at the upcoming May 27-June 1, 2024 meeting.


This doesn't mean, of course, that they won't try again, and again, and again... or that some new Disease X, Y, or Z using gain-of-function enhancement won't be released to bring about the longed-for emergency.


The final nail in humanity's coffin would be next...