| 
			 
			  
			
			  
			
			
			 
			
			  
			July 28, 2009 
			
			from
			
			EMSNews Website 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
				
					
						| 
						 
						The
						
						Late Heavy Bombardment 
						(commonly referred to as the lunar cataclysm, or LHB) is 
						a period of time approximately 4.1 to 3.8 billion years 
						ago (Ga) during which a large number of impact craters 
						are believed to have formed on the Moon, and by 
						inference on Earth, Mercury, Venus, and Mars as well.
						 
						
						The evidence for 
						this event comes primarily from the dating of lunar 
						samples, which indicates that most impact melt rocks 
						formed in this very narrow interval of time.  | 
					 
				 
			 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			Another comet hit Jupiter exactly on the 
			anniversary of the previous comet hit we saw 15 years ago.  
			
			  
			
			Also, the 
			
			Spitzer Space Telescope took a stunning picture of a galaxy that is 
			in the process of merging with a smaller galaxy, triggering massive 
			star formation activity around a very large black hole.  
			
			  
			
			It should 
			now be obvious that not only do all galaxies have black holes, all 
			galaxies are falling towards one and another, a paradox of the 
			expanding universe that really isn't expanding in this regard, but 
			rather, is falling into each other. 
			
			
			 
			  
			
			
			 
			 
			
			Jupiter - Our Cosmic 
			Protector? 
			
			
			
			NYTimes 
			
			July 25, 2009 
			
				
				An object, probably a comet that nobody saw coming, plowed into the 
			giant planet's colorful cloud tops sometime Sunday, splashing up 
			debris and leaving a black eye the size of the Pacific Ocean. 
				 
				
				  
				
				  
				
				
				
				  
				
				  
				
				This 
			was the second time in 15 years that this had happened.  
				  
				
				The whole 
			world was watching when
				
				Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 fell apart and its 
			pieces crashed into Jupiter in 1994, leaving Earth-size marks that 
			persisted up to a year.
  That's Jupiter doing its cosmic job, astronomers like to say. Better 
			it than us. Part of what makes the Earth such a nice place to live, 
			the story goes, is that Jupiter's overbearing gravity acts as a 
			gravitational shield deflecting incoming space junk, mainly comets, 
			away from the inner solar system where it could do for us what an 
			asteroid apparently did for the dinosaurs 65 million years ago. 
				 
				  
				
				Indeed, astronomers look for similar configurations 
				- a giant outer 
			planet with room for smaller planets in closer to the home stars - in other planetary systems as an indication of their hospitableness 
			to life. 
			 
			
			Since the beginning of our solar system, the gravitational pull of 
			the sun has sucked in lots of stuff. We know from looking at the 
			universe that there are these immense sheets of dark stuff that 
			blocks the light of the stars. We call this 'dust lanes' for example 
			and all spiral galaxies have these dust lanes. The dust looks fine 
			when seen from light-years away.  
			
			  
			
			But we have no idea how big this 
			stuff is, when seen close up compared to a human scale. For example, 
			is the immense seas of dense dust made up of stuff that is the size 
			of grains of sand or the size of planets? 
			 
			We know there is this fine dust which varies in amount as the solar 
			system rotates around the black hole in the center of the Milky Way. 
			Stars that are exploding create this finer dust.  
			
			  
			
			Unseen or unnoticed 
			by humans, a fine rain of dust falls into our planet every day. 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			This Milky Way picture shows the 
			solar system relative to the rest of our galaxy.  
			
			  
			
			Note that we are in 
			the Orion arm which used to the outermost arm of the galaxy back 5 
			billion years ago when it first formed.  
			
			  
			
			There is some theories that 
			the sun was part of a small star cluster that was moving along with 
			sheets of dust and when it was pulled into the gravitational pool of 
			the Milky Way's central black hole, the compression of the matter 
			surrounding this hobbit star cluster caused a sudden surge in 
			star-making. 
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			 
			Fountain of Mysterious Space Dust Found 
			
			
			
			SPACE.com 
			
			10 February 2009 
			
				
				In fact our solar system is currently 
				
				experiencing a cosmic dust storm 
				with at least three times as much dust passing through compared 
			to just a few years ago, owing to a periodic weakening of the sun's 
			magnetic field.  
				  
				
				And sometime in the next 10,000 years, we'll plow 
			through the G-cloud, a region of dust more dense than the one we're 
			in now. 
				
				  
				
				  
				
				
				
				  
				
				  
				
				  
				
				Astronomers have struggled for a conclusive answer as to where all 
			this dust comes from. 
			 
			
			Since the creation of the sun, we have rotated closer to the 
			galactic core.  
			
			  
			
			The sheets of dust that surround this core are still 
			ahead of us, we can see this at night when we look at the Milky Way. 
			Most of the starlight from this system is blocked by immense, nearly 
			unimaginable amounts of dust, rocks and asteroids all being squeezed 
			into a smaller and smaller space.  
			
			  
			
			When we look outwards, away from 
			the galactic core, we see flags and rags of this dark debris which 
			means, we are surrounded by this stuff. 
			 
			It obviously impacts on our own sun.  
			
				
			 
			
			There are many questions about all these things.  
			
			  
			
			Within 
			the astronomical community, there is much debate about 
			
			global 
			warming with significant dissent that perhaps it may be necessary 
			for us to have global warming if we are to avoid another spell of 
			ice age coldness. Conditions around us can change.  
			
			  
			
			Using Jupiter to 
			suck up most of the debris that is hurtling towards the sun won't 
			work so well if we go into a major dust lane episode at the same 
			time that Betelgeuse blows up. 
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			 
			Betelgeuse 
			
			
			
			Wikipedia 
			
				
				It is possible that Betelgeuse will become a supernova, which 
			will be the brightest ever recorded, outshining the Moon in the 
			night sky. Considering its size and age of 8.5 million years, 
			old for its size class, it may explode within the next thousand 
			years.  
				  
				
				Since its rotational axis is not toward the Earth and 
			also because of its 640 light year distance, Betelgeuse's 
			supernova will not cause a 
				
				gamma ray burst in the direction of Earth 
			large enough to damage its ecosystem. 
				
				  
				
				  
				
				
				
				  
				
				  
				
				  
				
				Nobel Laureate Charles Townes announced evidence that 15 consecutive 
			years of stellar contraction has been observed by UC Berkeley's 
			Infrared Spatial Interferometer (ISI) 
				atop Mt. Wilson Observatory in Southern California.  
				  
				
				Reported on June 9, 2009, the star 
				has shrunk 15% since 1993 with an increasing rate. The average 
				speed at which the radius of the star is shrinking over the last 
				15 years is approximately 470-490 miles per hour.
  According to the university, Betelgeuse's radius is about 5.5 
				
				AUs, 
			and the star's radius has shrunk by a distance equal to half an 
			astronomical unit, or about the orbit of Venus.  
				  
				
				Some theorists have speculated that this behavior is expected for a 
			star at the beginning of the gravitational collapse at the end of 
			its life. The mass of Betelgeuse puts it in range 
			to become a neutron star or possibly a black hole. 
			 
			
			If this happens during a passage through heightened dust conditions, 
			will this cause a compression of dust outwards from around 
			Betelgeuse and towards our own solar system?  
			
			  
			
			We know that all star 
			deaths, there is this ring of dust that is created by the star and 
			perhaps, the dust that surrounds the star's vicinity also is pushed 
			outwards and forms a ring around the dead star. So this event could 
			trigger a much, much higher rate of incoming star debris of all 
			sorts. 
			 
			By the way, my astronomer grandfather loved to tell me,  
			
				
				'You have exactly 8 
				minutes of time after the sun blows up, to know it blew up. Then 
				it is too late.'  
			 
			
			Ah, fun facts for small children!  
			
			  
			
			Well, 
			Betelgeuse may have already blown up long ago, back in the Middle 
			Ages during the Black Death! When we find out this has happened, it 
			is long after the fact. 
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			 
			Earth's Bombardment by Asteroids 3.9 Billion Years Ago May Have 
			Enhanced Early Life, Says CU Study 
			
			
			
			University of 
			Colorado at Boulder 
			
			May 20, 2009 
			
				
				Impact evidence from lunar samples, meteorites and the pockmarked 
			surfaces of the inner planets paints a picture of a violent 
			environment in the solar system during the 
				
				Hadean Eon 4.5 to 3.8 
			billion years ago, particularly through a cataclysmic event known as 
			the 
				Late Heavy Bombardment about 3.9 billion years ago.
				 
				
				  
				
				  
				
				  
				
				  
				
				  
				
				Although 
			many believe the bombardment would have sterilized Earth, the new 
			study shows it would have melted only a fraction of Earth's crust, 
			and that microbes could well have survived in subsurface habitats, 
			insulated from the destruction. 
				
					
					"These new results push back the possible beginnings of life on 
			Earth to well before the bombardment period 3.9 billion years ago," 
			said CU-Boulder Research Associate Oleg Abramov.  
					  
					
					"It opens up the 
			possibility that life emerged as far back as 4.4 billion years ago, 
			about the time the first oceans are thought to have formed."… 
				 
				
				The 3-D models allowed Abramov and 
				Mojzsis to monitor temperatures 
			beneath individual craters to assess heating and cooling of the 
			crust following large impacts in order to evaluate habitability, 
			said Abramov.  
				  
				
				The study indicated that less than 25 percent of 
			Earth's crust would have melted during such a bombardment. 
			 
			
			The 
			
			Late Heavy Bombardment
			event was probably when a planet was so 
			disrupted by gravitational pull combined with exterior events, it 
			blew up and its debris fell towards the sun, peppering all the inner 
			planets.  
			
			  
			
			The 
			asteroid belt is probably testimony of this lost 
			planet.  
			
			  
			
			Seeing that generally, the planets are all gas giants after 
			the asteroid belt and none are gas giants inside this belt is most 
			interesting and there are various theories to account for all this.  
			
			  
			
			The main thing is, we live in a danger zone and the gas giants 
			protect us to some degree but certainly, not totally. 
			  
			
			  
			
			 
			
			  
			
			
			 
			The Day The Moon Was Made 
			- 24 Hours of Chaos 
			
			
			
			SPACE 
			
			15 August 2001 
			
				
				A dark, lifeless object less than half as massive as Earth careens 
			around a newborn Sun.  
				  
				
				It is one of many planet-sized bodies hoping 
			for a long career. But its orbit is shaky. It's future grim. It is a 
			character actor on the grand stage of the solar system, a player of 
			great ultimate consequence but one destined to never see its name in 
			lights.
				 
				
				  
				
				This doomed "protoplanet" travels a path that crosses the orbits of 
			similar objects and, ultimately, cannot last.  
				  
				
				Eventually, the 
			nameless protoplanet meets up with a fledgling Earth. 
				
				  
				
				  
				
				
				
				  
				
				  
				
				  
				
				It is not a head-on collision, but rather a glancing blow. 
				 
				  
				
				The 
			impact imparts what astronomers call angular momentum into the 
			system. It sets Earth to spinning on its axis and creates a Moon 
			that would go round and round the host planet for billions of years. 
				 The shock of the impact strips material from the outer layers of 
			Earth and the impacting object. The mostly iron cores of both bodies 
			meld into Earth's core.  
				
				  
				
				It is like a compact car merging onto the 
			highway and colliding with an S.U.V. - glass, trim and hubcaps fly, 
			but the two chassis remain hopelessly tangled.
  All told, about 2 percent of the combined mass of the objects 
				- mostly rocky stuff that's largely bereft of iron - begins to orbit 
			the Earth. About half of this eventually becomes the Moon.
  Some of the stripped material is heated so fantastically that it 
			vaporizes and expands into the surrounding vacuum of space. 
				
					
					"The material that was vaporized expands into a cloud that envelops 
			the whole planet," Canup explained. 
				 
				
				Meanwhile, a long arm of solid matter is winging its way around 
			Earth.  
				  
				
				Some of it develops into a clump that slams back into the 
			planet. The rest is flung into orbit, all pretty much along a plane 
			that mimics the path of the incoming object.  
				  
				
				This plane slices 
			through what is now Earth's equator, and it is roughly the same 
			plane along which the Moon orbits. 
			 
			
			Note that iron didn't leave the Earth. This is due to it being 
			heavy.  
			
			  
			
			Mars is similar to the moon in this way, incidentally and 
			this leads me to a series of thoughts that are open to question but 
			are well within the bounds of natural probability: 
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			What is interesting is, Mars didn't do this.  
			
			  
			
			Mars is half 
			the size of earth but only a fraction (Ratio Mars/Earth = 0.107) of 
			earth's weight. Venus is nearly the same size as earth and unlike 
			Mars, has a gaseous atmosphere which all the planets beyond Mercury 
			have. 
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			 
			
			Asteroid belt 
			
			
			
			Wikipedia 
			
				
				The current asteroid belt is believed to contain only a small 
			fraction of the mass of the primordial belt. Computer simulations 
				suggest that the original asteroid belt may have contained mass 
				equivalent to the Earth.  
				
				  
				
				  
				
				
				
				  
				
				  
				
				  
				
				Primarily because of gravitational 
				perturbations, most of the material was ejected from the belt 
				within about a million years of formation, leaving behind less 
				than 0.1% of the original mass.  
				  
				
				Since their formation, the size 
				distribution of the asteroid belt has remained relatively 
				stable: there has been no significant increase or decrease in 
				the typical dimensions of the main belt asteroids. 
			 
			
			It is very interesting that the possibility that the asteroid belt 
			was once an Earth/Venus sized entity which then disintegrated due to 
			Jupiter.  
			
			  
			
			But this doesn't fit all possible models. If nothing else, 
			Nature loves logic and numbers. No system is more rational than the 
			systems set up by Nature, itself. So, logically speaking, Mars 
			should be the same mass category as Earth and Venus.  
			
			  
			
			Instead, it is 
			dwarfed by all the other planets except for Mercury. Certainly, if 
			the asteroid belt was once the mass of Earth, then this means there 
			was uniformity from Venus, Earth and then Mars and this is missing.
			We must presume that something altered the size of the two larger 
			inner ring planets.  
			
			  
			
			That is, there were collisions with more than 
			one 'Mars' sized planet during the
			
			Late Heavy Bombardment. 
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			 
			Jupiter 
			
			
			
			Wikipedia 
			
				
				Jupiter is 2.5 times more massive than all the other planets in our 
			Solar System combined - this is so massive that its barycenter with 
			the Sun actually lies above the Sun's surface (1.068 solar radii 
			from the Sun's center).  
				  
				
				Although this planet dwarfs the Earth (with 
			a diameter 11 times as great) it is considerably less dense. 
			Jupiter's volume is equal to 1,317 Earths, yet is only 318 times as 
			massive. A Jupiter mass (MJ) is used to describe masses of 
			other gas giant planets, particularly extrasolar planets.
  Theoretical models indicate that if Jupiter had much more mass than 
			it does at present, the planet would shrink.  
				
				  
				
				  
				
				
				
				  
				
				  
				
				  
				
				For small changes in 
			mass, the radius would not change appreciably, and above about four 
			Jupiter masses the interior would become so much more compressed 
			under the increased gravitation force that the planet's volume would 
			actually decrease despite the increasing amount of matter. 
				 
				  
				
				As a 
			result, Jupiter is thought to have about as large a diameter as a 
			planet of its composition and evolutionary history can achieve. The 
			process of further shrinkage with increasing mass would continue 
			until appreciable stellar ignition is achieved as in high-mass brown 
			dwarfs around 50 Jupiter masses. 
				  
				
				This has led some astronomers 
			to term it a "failed star", although it is unclear whether or not 
			the processes involved in the formation of planets like Jupiter are 
			similar to the processes involved in the formation of multiple star 
			systems. 
			 
			
			It is entirely possible that Jupiter's core could have been very 
			similar to Earth and Venus but for some reason, at the same time as 
			the 
			
			Late Heavy Bombardment
			period began, this planet collected a 
			runaway amount of interstellar gasses (from a nearby collapsed 
			star?) which nearly turned it into a sun. This is very, very 
			possible because we see, all over the place, dual star systems.  
			
			  
			
			Often, with a smaller star orbiting a larger one. Indeed, the times 
			we have detected planets in other star systems, these are often even 
			bigger than Jupiter. 
			 
			When Jupiter suddenly began to bulk up in size with this gas 
			collection business, this may have caused the Asteroid planet to 
			suddenly explode. That is, the inner core blew outwards which is why 
			there is a certain degree of uniformity with the size of the 
			Asteroid Belt debris.  
			
			  
			
			This explosion probably also stripped Mars of 
			much of its own atmosphere due to Mars being significantly smaller 
			than the other inner planets, the stripping of the atmosphere due to 
			this explosive event probably reduced the mass of Mars to the point, 
			it couldn't attract enough of the mass bombardment of this event, 
			90% of the debris of the Asteroid planet falling towards the sun.  
			
			  
			
			So 
			Mars not only didn't grow due to this event, it lost the chance to 
			double its own iron core. For we suspect that this missing planet 
			had a considerable iron core. 
			 
			The addition of this iron base may have increased the gas shell of 
			Venus and Earth, too. Another possibility could be, and this is a 
			very wild guess, that Mars is the moon of this missing planet that 
			once was in the Asteroid region.  
			
			  
			
			The similarity of the materials of 
			Mars with Lunar material means both may have been made the same way: 
			 
			
				
					- 
					
					Before the Late Heavy Bombardment, perhaps Mars was split from the 
			planet Asteroid during the same chaotic mess that created the 
			Earth's own moon?   
					- 
					
					Perhaps this planet was accreting the same mass 
			and materials as Jupiter and between them, they couldn't sustain 
			this accumulation?   
					- 
					
					And maybe this explosion caused the gasses to 
			fall into Jupiter's orbit which is why it is so much bigger than all 
			the other planets?   
					- 
					
					While the heavy mass fell into Earth and Venus? 
					 
				 
			 
			
			This month, old NASA sea dogs called for us to go to 
			Mars, yet 
			again.  
			
			  
			
			But if all this data is true, Mars will have precious little 
			to offer us in the way of hard mineral resources that would make up 
			for the difficulties of leaving it again. That is, the moon is 
			close, it is very much part of the Earth's gravitational pooling 
			system so moving mass from the moon to the earth or the reverse is 
			much more efficient and if we go anywhere else, it has to be to 
			other star systems.  
			
			  
			
			With maybe a jump off platform built in the 
			Asteroid Belt from the debris there which as a higher useable 
			mineral content comparable with our own planet. 
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			 
			NASA finds monster black hole sucking up gas, dust and stars at 
			centre of galaxy 
			
			
			
			Telegraph 
			
			24 July 2009 
			
				
				The star-ringed 
				
				black hole forms the eye of a galaxy called 
				
				NGC-1097 
			which was photographed by the US space agency's Spitzer Space 
			Telescope in California.
  A black hole is a region of space in which the gravitational pull 
			is so powerful that nothing, including whole planets, can escape 
			being sucked in if they come within its reach. 
				
				  
				
				  
				
				
				
				  
				
				  
				
				  
				
				The galaxy in the photograph is spiral-shaped, like our Milky Way, 
			and extends long arms of red stars into space.  
				  
				
				But NASA said the 
			black hole at the centre of the galaxy in which Earth is situated is 
			tame by comparison to NGC-1097, with the mass of just a few million 
			suns. 
				
					
					"The fate of this black hole and others like it is an active area of 
			research," said George Helou, deputy director of Nasa's Spitzer 
			Science Center at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. 
					 
					  
					
					"Some theories 
					hold that the black hole might quiet down and eventually 
					enter a more dormant state like our Milky Way black hole." 
				 
			 
			
			It should be painfully obvious to anyone that all galaxies are 
			falling into all other galaxies.  
			
			  
			
			The 
			
			Milky Way and Andromeda are 
			colliding. It seems, according to research this last year, that 
			Andromeda is falling towards us due to it having a smaller mass than 
			our own galaxy. Both Andromeda and the Milky Way are falling towards 
			the 
			
			Great Attractor, a monster cluster galactic system. The reason 
			NGC-1097 is so excited is due to it devouring the small companion 
			galaxy.  
			
			  
			
			The compression this is causing has already disrupted one of 
			the spiral arms and broken it apart. It will reform after the 
			smaller galaxy passes through and heads into the heart of the 
			system. 
			 
			When the smaller black hole system merges with the greater one, this 
			will cause immense tidal forces that will range not only across the 
			entire galactic system but will extend outwards into the area around 
			the galaxy, disrupting the shoals of cosmic dust that is also being 
			vacuumed into this black hole complex. 
			 
			THE MILKY WAY IS NOT DORMANT. It is simply moving. All these things 
			move in space and time!  
			
			  
			
			As Andromeda gets closer and closer, the 
			'dormancy' of our own galaxy will become very excited and energetic 
			as the tidal forces move across the face of the galactic plane.  
			 
			  
			
			  
			
			
			 
			Supernova Waves Rolled Over Mammoths 
			
			
			
			Astrobio 
			
			September 28, 2005 
			
				
				A distant 
				
				supernova that exploded 41,000 years ago may have led to 
			the extinction of the mammoth, according to research that will be 
			presented by nuclear scientist Richard Firestone of the U.S. 
			Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 
			(Berkeley Lab).  
				  
				
				Firestone, who conducted this research with Arizona 
			geologist Allen West, will unveil this theory at the 2nd 
			International Conference "The World of Elephants" in Hot Springs, 
			SD. Their theory joins the list of possible culprits responsible for 
			the demise of mammoths, which last roamed North America roughly 
			13,000 years ago.  
				  
				
				Scientists have long eyed climate change, disease, 
			or intensive hunting by humans as likely suspects. 
				
				  
				
				  
				
				
				  
				
				  
				
				  
				
				Now, a supernova may join the lineup. 
				 
				  
				
				Firestone and West believe 
			that debris from a supernova explosion coalesced into low-density, 
			comet-like objects that wreaked havoc on the solar system long ago. 
			One such comet may have hit North America 13,000 years ago, 
			unleashing a cataclysmic event that killed off the vast majority of 
			mammoths and many other large North American mammals.  
				  
				
				They found 
			evidence of this impact layer at several archaeological sites 
			throughout North America where Clovis hunting artifacts and 
			human-butchered mammoths have been unearthed. It has long been 
			established that human activity ceased at these sites about 13,000 
			years ago, which is roughly the same time that mammoths disappeared. 
				 They also found evidence of the supernova explosion's initial 
			shockwave: 34,000-year-old mammoth tusks that are peppered with tiny 
			impact craters apparently produced by iron-rich grains traveling at 
			an estimated 10,000 kilometers per second.  
				  
				
				These grains may have 
			been emitted from a supernova that exploded roughly 7,000 years 
			earlier and about 250 light years from Earth. 
			 
			
			This can't be a supernova event since it hammered ONLY North 
			America.  
			
			  
			
			I subscribe to the 'blow up of a comet' theory for this 
			reason. It destroyed the wildlife and humans who hunted these things 
			but only in the Great Plains, not in Central or South America or 
			even the Arctic circle region where there was no ice such as Alaska 
			or Siberia in Eurasia. 
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			 
			Earthquake 
			Shift Puts Kiwis Closer to Aussies in Distance Only 
			
			
			
			Bloomberg 
			
			July 26, 2009 
			
				
				Rob Valentine, the mayor of Hobart in Australia's island state of 
			Tasmania, says New Zealanders should be thankful their biggest 
			earthquake in 78 years pushed the neighbors 30 centimeters (12 
			inches) closer. 
				
					
					"They're just that little bit closer to paradise," Valentine said. 
					"As neighbors, we're really close, we can work together to 
					take on the rest of the world." 
				 
				
				The magnitude 7.8 quake on July 15, the strongest in the world this 
			year, struck off New Zealand's South Island, according to 
			seismological monitor GeoNet.  
				  
				
				Hobart is the Australian city nearest 
			to New Zealand, separated by 1,530 kilometers (951 miles) of water 
			across the Tasman Sea. 
			 
			
			Australia is rushing northwards faster than any tectonic plate on 
			earth.  
			
			  
			
			New Zealand is simply a ring of volcanic activity excited by 
			this northwards trek. Australia is deforming the entire Pacific 
			Basin and is the cause of all the volcanic activity of this 'Ring of 
			Fire'.  
			
			  
			
			And we might thank the Late Heavy Bombardment for the 
			existence of our landmasses.  
			
			  
			
			After all, I fear that maybe, there 
			would not have been this 'soup' of lighter materials to ride on top 
			of the iron core, if there wasn't a sudden surge in the amount of 
			interplanetary matter!  
			
			  
			
			Maybe, all our landmasses are really the 
			Asteroid planet! 
			  
			
			  
			
			   |