| 
			  
			  
			 
 
  by Robert M. Collins and William Moore
 
			
			Spanish 
			versionThis report was originally published 
			in
 
			"Focus" magazine edited by Bill 
			Moore,1991 
			from
			
			UFOConspiracy Website 
			  
			
			 
			click image for more 
			information 
				
				REPORTER: "And what planet do the EBENS "aliens" come from?"INTELLIGENCE SOURCE CODENAMED "FALCON" (RD): "(From) the Zeta Reticuli star group ... (there are) two suns together."
 
 Q: "And is this the primary source of the alien visitors here?"
 A: "Ahh, to the best of my knowledge, yes."
 
 Q: "How long does the trip from Zeta Reticuli take....?"
 A: "They can... do it in about 91 days."
 
 Q: "How big is their home planet?"
 A: "(The) EBEN’S planet is similar to Earth, but the air is a bit 
			thinner and contains a higher proportion of Argon and Helium. Also, 
			the average temperature is a bit cooler especially in the northern 
			part of their planet. They like our high mountain regions where the 
			air is thinner and the temperature is cooler. They can’t stand a lot 
			of heat.
 
 Q: "Now, can we get into describing the physical conditions and 
			characteristics of 
				
				the aliens?"
 A: "(They are) creature(s) about 3’4" to 3’8" tall. Their eyes are 
			extremely large, almost insect style (with) a couple of different 
			inner lids.... Their skin structure is extremely ahhh... it’s a very 
			elastic skin, and hard. Probably hardened from their sun."
 
 [from 
				Project Serpo - The Zeta Reticuli Exchange Program]
 
				
 
			The above was excerpted from interviews conducted with U.S. 
			intelligence agent codenamed "Falcon" in March, 1984 and February, 
			1987.
 Evidence gleaned from both the 
			
			Betty and Barney Hill abduction case 
			and from intelligence sources (including "Falcon", above) has 
			suggested that the home of at least one group of supposed alien 
			"visitors" to Earth may well be the Zeta Reticuli system. They are a 
			pair of companion stars (two stars traveling together in the same 
			direction at the same speed as a wide-binary system) located some 
			39.4 to 39.5 light-years distant.
 
 The prime source of information about these stars is L. DaSilva and 
			R. Foy’s paper "Zeta1 and Zeta2 Reticuli 
			- A Puzzling Solar-Type 
			Twin System".
 
 The two stars, Zeta 1 and 
			Zeta 2, are located in the southern 
			constellation of Reticulum (the net) and are thus never visible to 
			most of the northern hemisphere. Both are classed as old disk 
			population II stars whose age is between six to eight billion years. 
			There is every indication that both had a common origin and are part 
			of a relatively near-by old moving group (or loose cluster) of stars 
			which was first defined in 1958 and is known as the Zeta Hercules 
			group.
 
			  
			Zeta 1 Reticuli is separated from Zeta 2 Reticuli by at least 
			367 billion miles or about 100 times the Sun-Pluto distance.  
			  
			They 
			may be even farther apart but, as just mentioned above, the 
			available observations suggest they are moving through space 
			together and are therefore physically associated. They probably 
			require at least a 100,000 years to orbit around their common center 
			of gravity.
 Our own Sun has an estimated age of only five billion years and is 
			classed spectroscopically as a G-0 star (yellow-orange dwarf). Zeta 
			1 and Zeta 2 are classed as G-2 and G-1 respectively, with 
			luminosities ("L") of 0.8 and 1.02 (the Sun being L=1.0). This means 
			that both Zeta 1 and Zeta 2 are very Sun-like and could well possess 
			solar systems much like our own.
 
 In their highly technical paper, 
			DaSilva and Foy offer two very 
			important conclusions about these stars which radically contradict 
			earlier findings. These are that neither star is metal-deficient and 
			that neither is a close binary (or double). Earlier evidence 
			(published by Bonneau et al., 1980) identifying Zeta 2 as a very 
			close binary turns out to have been mistaken (Bonneau and Foy, 
			1986).
 
 The puzzling aspects of these "close" stars (One tenth of a light 
			year apart) center around discoveries of higher than expected 
			gravity and ultraviolet output when compared to their apparently 
			normal metal content (i.e. not metal-poor).
 
			  
			The ultraviolet excess 
			and kinematic (proper motion and orbit) data suggest that these two 
			stars belong to the old population II stars as mentioned earlier; 
			yet the apparent high gravity figure seems more typical of an unevolved, metal-poor condition. Since DaSilva and Foy’s work 
			resulted in strong confirmation of a Sun-like (or "normal") metal 
			content for these stars, they began to look elsewhere for an 
			explanation of the gravity paradox.    
			The answer came with the 
			discovery of an apparent overabundance of helium (twice as much as 
			our own Sun) in the stellar photospheres. This, when worked into the 
			calculations, not only explained the high gravity, but also 
			accounted for the observed problem of the stars’ high ultraviolet 
			output but relatively low overall luminosity. Another effect of the 
			helium abundance would be to slow the process of stellar evolution 
			across the main sequence.
 Additionally, it should be noted that 
			Zeta 1 was one of the first 
			stars ever to be used as a solar analog by astronomers. What might 
			these findings signify as far as Zeta 1 and/or Zeta 2 possessing 
			planets with 
			
			advanced intelligent life?
 
			  
			Let’s make a list of the 
			strong points which support this idea: 
				
					
					
					Both Zeta 1 and Zeta 2 are solar, or Sun-like stars. (If one 
			imagines a spherical section of our galaxy with a radius of 50 light 
			years and centered upon our Sun, only one star out of every eleven 
			contained therein will have Sun-like characteristics.)
					
					The previous objection that one and perhaps both stars appeared 
			to be close binaries has now been swept away. Stable planetary 
			orbits in the so-called eco-zone (i.e. close enough to the central 
			fire to produce conditions conducive to life) are more probable 
			around single stars than in close binary systems. 
					
					Both 
				Zeta 1 and Zeta 2 have an average age of between six and 
			eight billion years. This makes them from one to three billion years 
			older than our Sun and suggests that any life on planets associated 
			with them could be much further along in its evolutionary process 
			than we are.
					
					In many reported UFO abduction cases, the "visitors" have been 
			described as having a thick epidermis and multiple eyelids. This is 
			precisely the sort of adaptation one would expect for creatures who 
			evolved on a planet whose sun had a high ultraviolet output. 
			Curiously enough, these characteristics were also reported by the 
			intelligence source codenamed "Falcon" as early as 1981. 
			On the negative side, it must be admitted that there is no direct 
			observational evidence of planets around either Zeta 1 or Zeta 2. 
			However, a Canadian group reported that a Jupiter-sized planet 
			appears to exist in orbit around
			
			Tau Ceti, a Sun-like star only 
			about 11 light years away.  
			  
			Those readers familiar with the star map 
			developed by Marjorie Fish based upon information from the 
			
			Barney 
			and Betty Hill UFO abduction case, will recall that Tau Ceti was 
			identified as one of the stars on that map. 
			  
The Betty Hill Star Map as Interpreted by 
Ms. Marjorie Fish 
 
			Since the original 1991 publication of this report tremendous 
			strides have been made in the discovery of possible new solar 
			systems and the detection of planets around other stars: With each 
			passing day there is more and more data that appears to strengthen 
			the idea that solar systems are quite common and very abundant. 
 For current efforts to find planets around Zeta1 and Zeta2 see 
			
			The Anglo-Australian Planet Search. Both Zeta1(HD20766) and 
			Zeta2 (HD20807) are on their planet search list.
 
			  
			Thanks to Stanton 
			Friedman for this information and Dr  
			Chris Tinney who is head of 
			Astronomy at the Anglo-Australian Observatory.
 In a report Mario Livio maintains that carbon production didn’t 
			peak until about 2 billion years before the sun-earth were formed 
			and that advanced type intelligent life didn’t emerge on Earth until 
			~ 4 million years ago.
 
			  
			Of course assuming estimate errors (perhaps 
			large) this more than leaves room for the Zeta Reticuli Star System 
			with a current estimated age of ~ 7 billion years: Or, the Zeta Reticuli Star System was in the formation process when this carbon 
			production peaked according to Livio.  
				
					
						| 
						
						 | 
						
						 |  
						| 
						Starmap of the southern sky showing Zeta Reticuli system in relation 
			to the south celestial pole | 
						Drawing of Marjorie Fish’s interpretaton of the Betty Hill "Star 
			Map" |  
			
			 
			
			
			The Zeta Reticuli Incident by Terrence Dickinson   
			References 
				
			 
			  |