by Dan Davidson

from his book Shape Power, 1997 (Parts of Chapter 6)


Joe Parr Pyramid Energy Bubble Discovery

The material on Joe Parr was given during my talk at the International Tesla Society in 1992. The following text and graphs are from that speech. Some of the information on gravity wheel experiments was given at the 1996 Natural Philosophy Alliance sub-group, during the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) conference in Flagstaff Arizona at the Northern Arizona University campus.


Shape as an Energy Sensor


A major breakthrough has been achieved by Joe Parr, whereby he has developed several sensors that quantify pyramid energy. His gamma ray transducer is based on his discovery that pyramid energy attenuates gamma rays. He has discovered that one of the aspects of aether energy in and around a pyramid is as a spherical aetheric energy field centered at the 1/3 height level. This is shown in Figure 7.2.1-1 which depicts one of Joe’s first experimental setups to detect pyramid energy fields. This discovery has led to the possibility of a free energy machine as well as a true space drive based on generation of gravitational force fields using rotated pyramid shapes.

One of the things which Joe Parr found in the pyramid energy conversion experiments, as depicted in Figure 7.2.1-1, was that the pyramids quit responding now and then and he had no explanation as to why. He did find correlation with celestial events with his experiments. Sun spot activity seems to affect the intensity of the pyramid energy bubble.

The gravity energy sensor, which Joe Parr discovered, involves the Great Pyramid and pyramid shapes in general. This sensor uses a static (i.e., non-moving) pyramid aligned north-south/east-west. Flat coils wound on audio tape reels were placed on the north and south side of the pyramid. A spark gap, made from a blown 1 microfarad capacitor, was placed at the apex of the pyramid in series with a battery, resistor and chart recorder. A chart recorder registered daily changes in the energies around the pyramid.

The chart recorder records the state of a bubble of energy which surrounded the pyramid. The energy bubble, over time, had various levels of opacity to all types of radiation. Experiments putting radio frequency emitters, radioactive sources - specifically beta and gamma emitters, magnetic sources, and ion sources all showed attenuation when in the energy bubble which surrounds the pyramid. Intensive research over 13 years showed that the bubble could be fed negative ions and this would intensify the opacity of the bubble. At certain times of the year the energy bubble would totally block the force of gravity, nuclear radiation, and electromagnetic radiation. Another effect revealed that the pyramid seemed to be resonant at 500 and 1000 Hz. This means that the force field around the pyramid become totally opaque (i.e., non-conductive) to all known forces.


Dynamic Pyramid ES Generation


At one time during the 11 year sun spot cycle, the static pyramid sensor went dead and quit providing data. In order to find another method of continuing the research, the reasoning was that a moving sensor could possibly continue providing data. Joe Parr built an elaborate experimental setup he named the “centrifuge”. The centrifuge “pyramid motor” is illustrated in figure 7.2.2-1.

Figure 7.2.2-1 John Parr's Pyramid Centrifuge


Extensive experiments with the centrifuge provided additional data on the pyramid energy bubble. Positive ions in the centrifuge would cause the pyramid to be drawn to the moon. Negative ions in the centrifuge would cause the pyramid to be repelled away from the moon. At certain times of the year (around December 8th-15th and May 8th-15th) the energy bubble around the pyramids in the centrifuge would become totally opaque to all local gravitation, electromagnetic, and inertial forces. When this happened, the little one inch base pyramids would rip off the end of the centrifuge arm causing extensive damage to the interior of the centrifuge.


Detailed analysis of the amount of energy of the pyramid, needed to rip it free of its epoxy mounting, showed that an 8 gram pyramid had approximately 2000 pounds of force (i.e., 113,000 times increase in kinetic energy). It is hypothesized that the pyramid moves into a different time/space condition, which Joe called hyperspace, when the pyramid is in the alternating magnetic field. When the pyramid moves out of the alternating magnetic field of the centrifuge, the pyramid comes out of h-space with huge amounts of additional energy.

The centrifuge experiments also operated the same as the static pyramid in that putting radio frequency sources, radioactive sources, magnetic sources, and ion sources inside the pyramid showed that the energy of the energy sources was attenuated when in the pyramid energy bubble.

Figure 7.2.2-2

Photograph of Joe Parr’s Pyramid Centrifuge

This method relies on pyramids mounted on the outside of a rotor which is rapidly rotated. An E-field perpendicular to the rotor is aligned with rotor axis. A magnetic field is aligned perpendicular to the axis of the rotor. Thus, when the rotor spins, the pyramids not only make and break the E-field but have an alternating magnetic field at right angles to the E-field.

Analysis revealed detail in regard to alignment of the magnetic field with the pyramids. If the magnets cover the entire width of the rotor, then the electrostatic field gets generated in one direction on one side of the rotor axis and in the opposite direction on the other side of the axis. The question is - would this nullify the energy generation effect or does it make any difference since electrons are electrons???


Joe Parr Gravity Wheel Experiments

The centrifuge research led Joe Parr to hypothesize that perhaps a three dimensional pyramid was not totally necessary. A new experiment was devised which replaced the large centrifuge assembly with a small specially designed wheel mounted on a shaft and spun by a small high speed motor.

Joe Parr developed a simpler dynamic experiment related to the centrifuge but a much simpler apparatus to perform experiments. This experimental setup is shown in Figure 7.2.3-1. It is a four inch wheel made of printed circuit board material with 24 triangles the shape of the great pyramid face around the circumference of the wheel. The triangles are placed opposite each other on both sides of the wheel. The wheel, I have termed the gravity wheel, spins in between two stators which have low gauss (100 gauss each) ceramic magnets which are positioned so the magnet is cross the 1/3rd height of the triangles. An electrostatic ion generator is positioned next to the experiment to feed ions to the experiment. Gravitation bubbles or forcefields form around each of the triangles when the wheel is spun at high speeds. The ion generator is not shown in figure 7.2.3-1. Photograph of Joe’s gravity wheel experiment is shown in figure 7.2.3-3.


Force Fields Of The Gravity Wheel Experiment

The Parr experiments revealed the force fields created by the spinning gravity wheel experiment and are depicted in Figure 7.2.4-1. There are two types of force fields built up in and around the experiment. There is an ovoid shaped forcefield around each of the copper triangles. When these small force fields build up in intensity, they cause a drag on the motor which can be plainly heard in the lab. There is a larger forcefield which builds up around the entire experiment setup. Tests done by Joe Parr using special instrumentation and a dowser plus independent tests by the author with a clairvoyant and a clairsentient, all verify the large force field around the experimental setup plus the smaller forcefields around each of the triangles.

What Joe has discovered is that the earth moves through energy conduits which go from our sun to other planets and star systems. When the gravity wheel experiment crosses one of these energy conduits, the forcefield around the copper triangles intensifies to the extent that the bubble goes opaque to all local forces and starts moving down the conduit very rapidly and a scale upset occurs. Attempts at simulating the energy conduit thus far have failed. We are in the process of evaluating the data and we have found some correlation with planetary and stellar conjunctions where the earth is lined up with other planets or stars and our sun. The data analysis is currently in its infancy so we can make no statements of solid fact other than that we are getting some very impressive gravitational effects.


Duplication of Gravity Wheel Experiments

The author had been following Joe Parr’s experiments over several years; and after Joe had some initial success with the new experimental setup, the author, with Joe Parr’s assistance, built a duplicate experiment.

Figure 7.2.3-1

Rotor Using Triangles As Shape Power Collectors

Gravity Wheel Experimental Setup and Results

It took several months to get my version of the experiment to operate successfully. Tuning involved getting the experimental setup oriented properly and proper grounding. The shaft must be oriented east-west. A negative ion source is set within a few feet of the spinning wheel to feed the force fields which form around the copper triangles affixed to the gravity wheel. The experiment is set on a delicate scale which measures accurate to 0.5 grams. The static weight of my experimental setup is about 1200 grams. Joe Parr’s version is about 1800 grams. My experiment used machined maplewood to hold the motor and shaft, and the stanchions which hold the magnets and Parr’s experiment was made of machined aluminum. A photograph of my gravity wheel experiment is shown in figure 7.3.1-1.

Figure 7.2.3-3

Close-up of Joe’s Gravity Wheel Experiment.

The main result between my version of the gravity wheel experiment and Joe’s is that Joe’s burns out a motor at nearly every conduit and mine doesn’t. Evidently, the interaction of the force field with the aluminum stanchions in Joe’s version cause enough resistance to burn out the motor.

Figure 7.2.3-1.

Ovoid Forcefield Around Gravity Wheel Experiment

and Small Energy Bubbles Surrounding each of the Triangles of the Gravity Wheel

During experimental operations, the weight of the experiment can drop from 0 to -6.5 grams. When one considers that the gravity wheel with the copper triangles weighs about 12 grams, the total normal operational levitation effect is on the order of 50% weight loss. This by itself is a remarkable experimental effect and deserves acute attention.

The scale which is used in the experiment is an Ohaus Precision Plus purchased from Cole Parmer. The scale can measure accurately within 0.5 grams over a range of 0-4000 grams. The scale has an RS¬232 serial interface which allows the scale to be interfaced to a printer or computer. The scale outputs the weight continuously except when there is a scale upset. The upset weight can be varied and it was set at the maximum of 5 grams. This means that if the weight on the scale changes more than 5 grams within a couple of milliseconds, then the RS-232 interface stops outputting the RS-232 signal contained the weight as measured by the scale.

My preliminary hookup of the scale was to a computer; however, the intense forcefield which builds up around the experiment destroyed two computer interface cards. Since the RS-232 interface stops outputting data on a scale upset, the serial output of the scale was converted to a voltage level and used as an indicator. When the voltage drops, a scale upset has occurred. The voltage level change was/is interfaced into a pulse counter. This provides a count of scale upsets greater than 5 grams. Figure 7.3.1-3 is a graph over time of scale upsets. This shows the count of when the gravity wheel changed weight over 5 grams. If the 6.5 gram weight loss is added to the 5 gram upset, we are looking at nearly a 100% weight loss of the gravity wheel. Joe Parr’s gravity wheel experiment and my both got the same interstellar conduit on April 11, 1996.

Figure 7.3.1-1

Close-up of Dan’s Gravity Wheel Experiment

Figure 7.3.1-3. Data from Dan Davidson's Gravity Wheel Experiment


In the summer of 1996, we did a calibration of my experiment by comparison with Joe’s experiment running in California. It turns out the magnets which I used were too strong. My magnets were replaced with ones which are approximately 100 gauss each. Apparently, if the magnets are too strong they override the energy conduit signal and the apparatus sensitivity drops drastically. This explains why on a given conduit, Joe’s experiment would get 200,000 plus scale upsets and my experimental setup get only about 1500 upsets.

On a new set of experiments where my new sensor was calibrated to act like Joe’s, both our experiments detected the same energy conduits. This is illustrated in figure 7.3.1-4. Joe Parr is located on the west coast and my experiment is in Arizona. Both Joe’s and my gravity wheel experiment got the same big energy conduits on December 12 through the 14, 1996 and another conduit January 3-5, 1997. During these two conduit periods, I was getting momentary weight losses on the order of 30 to 64 grams. This means that the gravity wheel was getting a negative weight which means that the total weight loss was as high as 533%. Joe and I believe that these experiments mean we have the embryonic basis for a true space drive.

Astronomical Correlations With Great Pyramid

There are numerous relationships of the Great Pyramid with various astronomical bodies. The two main constellations which are related to the pyramid are Taurus (the bull) and Orion (the hunter). Both these constellations are in the same portion of the sky. Taurus is located just above Orion.

The Taurus/Pleiades Connection

The star Alcyone in the constellation Taurus marks the foundation setting (i.e., when construction was initiated on the Great Pyramid) date of the Great Pyramid. Alcyone is one of the brightest stars in the Pleiades, which is part of the Taurus constellation. The ascending passageway in the Great Pyramid has a score line on it which pointed to Alcyone in 2144 BC. Alcyone is lined up with the sun and just above it and the earth during the month of May. Figure 7.4.1-1, which depicts the major energy conduits, shows the May 2 conduit. Not shown on the chart was a conduit last year on the 27th of May, also an Alcyone correlation.

One of the best confirmed UFO cases has to do with Billy Myers, from Switzerland, who claims to have been contacted by extraterrestrials who hail from the Pleiades. Some of the best authenticated photographs of UFOs have been taken by Myers, which he claims are Pleiadian beam ships. Could these beam ships be riding the energy conduits discovered by Joe Parr?

Figure 7.4.1-1.

Energy Conduits Discovered with Gravity Wheel Experiment

The Orion Connection

The big conduit in the middle of December, shown in Figure 7.4.1-1, and first week of January leads to another important connection, that of the great pyramid and the Orion constellation (see figure 7.4.2-1). Research by one of the early Great Pyramid surveyors, Sir Flinders Petrie, revealed that the King Chamber’s northern air duct of the Great Pyramid generally pointed to the star Thuban (alpha Draconis) in the constellation Draco (the dragon), which was the pole star at the time of the pyramids creation, and the southern air duct pointed to one of the stars in the constellation Orion’s belt around 2600 BC.


More precise modern measurements have also shown that the King’s Chamber’s north and south air ducts and the Queen’s Chamber southern air duct date the pyramid at 2450 BC. The details of this discovery by Bauval is depicted in Figure 7.4.2-2 below.

Figure 7.4.2-1.

Orion Constellation.


It is interesting to note that the earth is lined up with the sun and the three stars in Orion’s belt around the 13th-15th of December each year. In the first week of this year, 1997, at sunrise and sunset the sun is lined up with the 3 stars in Orion’s belt AND with the axis of the gravity wheel experiment.


In other words, there appears to be a huge energy conduit (see Figure 7.4.2-3) between our sun and the constellation Orion which stimulates the gravity wheel force fields to totally close to all known local forces (i.e., gravity, electromagnetic, inertial, and radioactivity) and the entire gravity wheel experiment tried to lift off toward Orion.

Figure 7.4.2-2.

Correlation of the Orion with Great Pyramid.

Did spacemen from Orion build the Great Pyramid? Is the energy conduit a communications and stellar stargate? Remember, the Parr gravity experiments tries to fly (gravitate?) down the energy conduit. That is why the experiment loses weight.

Figure 7.4.2-3

Correlation of the Gravity Wheel Experiment with Constellation Orion.