|
AlienMind
The Verdants
28. - The Notion of
Physicality
For the most part, human science is framed in terms of objects,
forces, and vectors. Such concepts date from the times of the
Greeks.
More recently,
quantum physics has teased such concepts into
a new light:
-
all atomic particles are “thingless” and non-concrete
-
there’s a seeming “randomness” of motion among them (a definition
that both defines and limits itself)
-
there’s sometimes a
faster-than-light “quantum connectedness” between them
Weirder
still, there are seemingly infinite energy fluctuations in quantum
interactions. In short, our science is suspended in mid-step with
one foot in a primitive past, the other just beginning to test the
waters of a profoundly new paradigm.
Meanwhile, alien physics is framed in terms of effects, rather than
forces. That may sound like a subtle difference, but it’s not. It’s
a major re-framing that allows for greater flexibility and a
sometimes subtle, sometimes fateful blending of phenomena on a
cosmic scale. Concepts that we take for granted (the seeming unity
of an atomic particle, the ability to enumerate particles as though
each is separately whole-numbered and individual, the solely forward
flow of time) are not accepted by aliens. Aliens begin from a
different premise, a different set of assumptions.
For example, we humans have an essentially liquid sense of
ourselves. We think of our bodies as substantial, composed of fluids
and a solid bone structure. The fears and instincts that move us
daily are framed in terms of such concepts: burns, impacts, food
energy, and contagion (*sex is for physical pleasure but it’s also
about continuity). So, we talk about power (use of force to move
objects), and possession (control of objects).
Aliens have a larger and more airy, community sense of themselves
(more space than thing). They see themselves as being composed on a
sub-quantum level where negative and alternative cycle fluctuations
can gently connect on a universal scale. Rather than think of
themselves as objects made up of tiny systems of objects (atoms),
they see themselves as being hyper-connected to larger universal
cycles, of sorts. It’s a categorically smarter kind of concept, and
it subsumes atomic chemistry.
While humans think of themselves as
solid, nothing is solid in the alien view. Nothing.
Instead, aliens define themselves in terms of finer, tighter
networks, patterns of resonance among sub-quantum interactions. So
they’re composed of fantastically more capable relationships, all of
which connect on a larger scale - which allows for shared
community/communities of mind. It’s a much more civilized kind of
identity, although it poses new challenges. A more complex universe
is within you, hence you must learn to accord within a more complex
universe. For aliens, evolution is in every term of the equation;
it’s always part of their makeup.
Although there are obvious exceptions, less physically pretentious
aliens’ lives are ordered in terms of:
-
equality (within a society,
but not always between societies)
-
the integrity of global and
larger ecosystems
-
cosmic connectedness (relations with other
aliens, hyperdimensional science, and a finite universal ecology)
I’ve both heard, and have been involved in, many discussions about
this with a variety of different aliens. I’ve heard them compete in
such terms (re who is more consistently so), and I’ve heard them
quickly resolve disagreements in terms of the common striving.
Such considerations are always
extant - at times an alien may depart from equal connectedness, yet
must return to that higher order in order to advance his or her
awareness. There’s almost always another, more evolved society that
a given alien people strive to emulate, hence they must be
co-homologous within higher order relationships (the universal
ecology, larger understandings, and a higher form of mind). It’s a
remarkably peaceful basis.
While humans tend to see from their inside looking out, aliens try
to see through themselves in a way that spans more deeply inward,
which allows for a seemingly external remote-viewing of both their
bodies and their individuality (via the larger social whole, or the
universe). This occurs in telepathic interactions and in larger
group consciousness. To be able to do so, aliens take the more
civilized step of fading themselves down, in a sense, in order to
evacuate themselves into larger continuity. Usually, the more
largely they interact (within a greater shared awareness), the more
advanced and capable they are.
This involves a kind of remote sensing
and it models the universe as all-inclusive, as should be the
awareness. A major part of this is only possible because of, and is
mediated by, larger pre-existing intelligent relationships (this is
most important). Advanced aliens see through themselves and must
continually re-examine or redefine certain basic assumptions.
At a minimum, aliens are more studied and scientific than we are.
This requires self-control and social purpose. The problem, of
course, is that some highly technological aliens aren’t so well
versed and sensitive in terms of what we might call “the
humanities.” Among aliens, sentience is implicit in all shared
consciousness, but a given regime can intrude upon and color it, one
way or another. Although their contacts may seem universal, a
selective bias can distort their sense of community of mind.
Rather
than remain open to the larger, more advanced universal continuity,
a regime may frame social identity in terms of its own needs and
preferences. It may speak as though its citizens are all one
singular entity, but the universe is actually more varied than that.
It’s not all one singular condition (although hyper-advanced kind
may favor a subtle shading of the notion).
This calls into question the very nature of an observation. No
matter how smug and dogmatic a regime may be about the one-ness of
its connection to the larger universe, if the regime has committed
too many crimes it simply won’t connect in certain ways. The larger
order of being may be different. Greater, more intelligent
dimensions of consciousness cannot be reduced to those of the
offenders.
Which brings us back to the notion of physicality. A human might
ask, “What am I?” But an alien will ponder “how” he/she or they may
be. It’s a more airy, expansive notion of ever-evolving
relationships. It isn’t so physical… Which begs the question:
Are we
actually physical, or do we think we’re physical because that’s the
limit of our concept, and because we’re physically vulnerable?
We’ve
heard aliens discuss such notions at various junctures. The thinking
goes something like this: All aliens are both determined and defined
by greater, universal quantities.
So in the most advanced form, we
interact universally (at least to some extent), hence in our most
valid and most capable identity, we’re a hyper-connected community
of mind. Individual peculiarities aside, universally valid ideas are
perpetual. Reportedly, great effort goes into assuring a sustainable
re-cycling of the universe. So, in a sense, even though we die, the
greater validity, the best of our being, goes on and can conceivably
cycle back into other being(s). For example, when we die, do we go
to zero, or do we continue to fluctuate within finer, “less than
zero” energy dynamics?
At the very least, we condition
subsequent lives. And the better part of us, an undying higher
community of mind, is our striving, hence we must ever be mindful of
such.
However, a basic question arises:
Do some beings exist in
cruder form because that was determined by their weakness and
limitations in a previous time, or is that but an irony of the
complex and imperfect inter-relationships that allow for a renewed
(seemingly physical) existence?
It’s probably safe to say that most aliens aren’t coldly and
mechanically deterministic. They certainly know about evolution and
genetics, but sometimes we hear vague drift about how flawed
identity essentially groups itself with other flawed identities
(i.e. limited ideas). This occurs in conversations about greater
community of mind as compared to relatively backward individual
cases.
The logical response of some aliens is that none of us are
complete without the larger whole. Instead, we’re all merely
complementary of each other, or fractional in a mathematical sense,
and none can exist in complete isolation. The implication is that
higher mind is more capable when more of us participate and are
consistent with such, hence all backward forms must evolve.
So, where do conversations of this sort arise? In mixed
interactions, here.
Human contact now involves a multiple variety of
observing alien populations. Given that we live near a large, open
travel corridor that winds through the galaxy (just beyond the
comparatively sparse edge of the Milky Way arm that you see overhead
in the night sky), there are a multiplicity of interested
populations. Recently evolved aliens (humans and others) engage in
discussions - either with, or about older populations like
the Verdants and with the participation of various categories of
hyperversal aliens of varying duration.
For example, along with other humans I
may raise objections about the current intervention here. You can
probably guess which hyperversals defend the idea of
like-identities-falling-in-with-similar-others. In part, the
argument is a rationalization of an off-world policy toward
humankind (and others). In part, it reflects a certain attitude.
Meanwhile, a thoughtful, regenerative mind can always encompass
greater consideration, but that requires humility. Ultimately, we’re
all merely complimentary.
There’s another kind of conversation that goes on both between
aliens, and in their thoughts. It centers on the basic question of
how a universe was/is derived and can even exist in a stable,
orderly way. If it exists, as is obvious, then a basic corollary is
that it must all integrate. In order to exist, there must be a
larger conservation, of sorts, checks and balances to prevent excess
and violations of the larger ecology.
Many aliens expect you to have
pondered how that can be done. They expect you to have thought about
how the entire universe can seem to be both physical, yet not
concrete. In other words, if you know that there must be
conservation in all relationships of all sorts, then how do you both
embody and accord with such? What are you doing to improve both
yourself and your kind in such regard?
You will be tested in this regard, whether you realize it or not.
We’re all transparent, in this sense. If you verge on alien science
and seek to interact more largely, do you understand how it all
derives, in the first place? It’s as though none of what you do is
valid unless you both respect and seek finer integration with other
beings and their needs, their basic premise.
If you disregard them
entirely, then,
-
What happens if, being much more capable, they
disregard you?
-
What are the consequences?
More specifically, alien science and the politics of their
interactions point to a succession of universe cycles (an extended
continuity). We’ve heard specific hyperversals’ statements on the
subject. That, in turn, suggests that various categories of more
advanced beings both exist and pre-date us, hence we must curtail
our energy demands and allow for their delta t/alt t needs, even if
such beings don’t immediately appear before us when we want them to.
Again,
For example,
-
Is it right to want to
travel great distances and sample other aliens’ ways of life?
-
Or as
the aliens in Summers’ books,
The Allies of Humanity suggest, should
we seek larger understandings yet not physically travel in great
numbers?
In a higher awareness of the universe, you don’t need to
physically go there. Meanwhile, you’re expected to know that the use
of energy by any and all kinds must be monitored and kept within
certain bounds. Any and every system can be clocked in this regard.
You can see how such considerations always return to basic questions
of humility, good science and larger consideration. Thoughts about
the ultimate derivation of the universe take you through different
cycles, in a sense, hopefully improving you each time you “go”
there. One further, related question arises. Should all humans and
aliens be encouraged toward such considerations, or should they
simply be allowed to lapse and receive a deserved physical fate, if
they fail to do so?
Some advanced aliens say that if we’re too far
wrong, we shouldn’t know too much, to begin with. It’s a sensitive
issue involving life, fate, and nearly tao-like consequences of any
behavior. It touches upon whether all people are compatible with
higher communities of mind. This is much more important than some
might think.
The entire, unifying premise for all aliens (including all of the
most advanced societies) leaps far beyond the reach of specious
wants and pretensions. The two are immutable. To simply enjoy your
one small life, or family, is not enough. Both the distant past and
the future were/are dominated by greatly more advanced beings, so
the defining standards are clear.
Such beings only achieved a
universal basis (knowledge, communications, and more) through
refined, shared mutuality. The most extensive interactions and
capabilities are all-inclusive - they leap further out, yet go more
deeply inward, everywhere. Where, within such identity, is there
room for hatred and impulses toward violence? We’re talking about
actual, existing populations, not abstractions.
Have no doubt:
through a basic, universal hyperdynamic the most
advanced inclusion can go anywhere and touch upon any individual.
So
when you encounter the studied and expansive yet more reserved perspective(s) of such aliens, remember: they must be clear and
responsible, yet abiding and tolerant of diversity in order to
participate.
This raises questions about how aliens test and measure themselves
re: their standards, social deviance, and acceptability.
-
How do they
all get along, and what do they live for?
-
Are their social controls
based on fear, or is it good science and mutually understood
principle (the common sense of commonality)?
We’ve seen how regimes
of fear arise when specious distortions lead to lack of
proportionality. The Verdant colonial scheme is but one example.
Meanwhile, more humble, considerate aliens and some hyperversals
more closely approximate the greater universal premise.
So, back to our main question: Are we physical, or is the notion of
physicality, itself, evolving?
Here on Earth, quantum physics did
away with the notion of concreteness. Now we know that nothing is
solid. Since 1928 we’ve known that we’re composed of
ever-fluctuating energy and elusive quantum packets. Some of it is
always leaking out into space, ever moving and enigmatic. None of it
is solidly physical. Instead, it’s mostly emptiness.
Once you understand that many aliens see themselves as composed of
finer sub-quantum fluctuations conditioned by a larger universal
continuity, your basic concepts begin to seem that much less
physical (although, in some ways they’re still bounded and finite).
Again, it’s a question of how much the typical observer either
knows, or understands. In a sense, we aren’t entirely “real”
(whole-numbered), yet we obviously exist.
Generally, the more advanced the aliens, the less concrete is their
self-concept. This is due to the humbling effect of larger
interactions and group identity, plus the need to reduce population
numbers. Meanwhile, of course, we see aliens with hyper-advanced
technology who seem overly preoccupied with physical security
(preventing unwanted snoops, averting primitive upstarts, and
securing ideal surroundings). It’s a basic conundrum (especially
when their hybrids try to divert you with low-order slop routines
when you investigate them).
Some hyper-advanced aliens tell us to remember that even their kind
are biological beings with physical needs, not merely spirits.
They’ve cautioned us to be observant and scientific in this regard
because first contact can easily deceive the most narcissistic and
simple minded among us. Predatory aliens know how to manipulate a
young population. They know corruption intimately—from their own
experience. There are destabilization schemes by large trading
collectives, interventions in which vulnerable planets are driven to
desperation, then takeover. They know an easy prospect when they see
one.
Meanwhile, although some can’t bring themselves to admit it,
elite
economics has proven inadequate on this planet. Unlike alien
commonality, it doesn’t work for the common good; it doesn’t
complete the circle. Instead, it propagates illusion and
superficiality.
Self-interested sociopaths are promoted in
government, where they work to promote cronies, resulting in
extremes of crime and secrecy. It’s killing this planet.
The
personal attributes that such people regard as strengths (greed,
predation, and the willingness to steal public resources) are seen
as epic weaknesses on more advanced planets. On alien planets, the
end of inequality is a watershed event, more stark than was the
difference, here, between the Roman empire and Christianity.
The IFSP’s ability to manipulate conflict here, as was reportedly
done on other planets, is premised on secrecy that helps Verdants
gain a foothold. Various reports suggest that IFSP operatives’
strategy is to manipulate economic and religious extremes, making it
difficult for humans to even discuss alien science and politics.
Instead, we see lies in major media and blanket dismissals of the
entire subject---at the worst possible time in human history.
Although the 20th century saw a decline of colonialism here, the
Verdant empire was founded on such impulses (just before our
Jurassic period). However, now that humans are more aware of aliens,
a window of opportunity may be closing for the Verdants here
(assuming that their interest isn’t merely diplomatic).
Numerous
non-IFSP aliens and my own probing indicate that in order to
maximize the IFSP’s chances here, IFSP operatives have accelerated
their strategy of tensions. At present, we see a recurrence of old
colonial dynamics (domination, subordination, and manipulated
conflicts), which seem like a throwback to primitive times. In part,
this is due to a regressive lag in Verdant evolution, which has come
to affect us directly.
When the Verdant regime was cobbled together, it absorbed the
accumulated corruptions of thousands of different worlds. In other
words, they aren’t innocent. As is evidenced by Verdant excess, the
ruin of the grays’ planet (an IFSP intervention), the grays’
inability to speak on major issues, and the actions of the IFSP’s
direct operatives here, the IFSP isn’t held together by democracy
and critique. Instead, it was pieced together through cold
manipulation. As Verdants admit, some target planets were killed by
deliberate design.
Then, their resources were easy to take
advantage of. Mindful of such disasters, we must ask whether
specious rationalization has spoiled some Verdants’ judgment (even
hyperversals admit that self-interest tends to cloud most physical
designs on resources).
In duplicitous fashion, the IFSP has cut
secret deals with humans guilty of crimes against humanity while
posing as though above such doings elsewhere. Verdants want to be
able to say they steered human elites toward transforming crisis,
but now that IFSP operatives can be exposed with relative ease,
Verdant prospects appear to be diminishing.
That 500 trillion Verdants live on 246,000 planets is no doubt a
policy and treaty concern for Milky Way aliens. Milky Way aliens may
want to approach us in a less aggressive way so that we can learn by
better example. After all, they have to live with us forever.
Meanwhile, Verdants dart in at the last moment and tentatively
occupy a number of our surrounding star systems, where they’ve
reportedly bred hybrid enclaves to suit their design (the Nordics
and Semitics of Altair, the tall whites, and gray hybrids who
crashed at Roswell fit this pattern).
*
The so-called Nordics and Semitics are human-looking aliens
discussed by government whistleblower
Dr. Michael Wolf and others
- see
Richard Boylan. Wolf said that Nordics (tall, often
blonde aliens who look like humans) and Semitics (long-nosed aliens
who look semitic human) come from the fourth and fifth planets of a
star called Altair, which is easily visible from our northern
hemisphere.
However, Wolf said both groups are derived of another
human-looking group from the Pleiades star cluster. In other words,
they would all be related.
Billy Meier’s much-disputed contacts
feature “Pleiadians” (although he now calls them Plejarans).
The problem with “Pleidians” is two-fold.
-
One, contactees say the Pleiadians are enemies of the grays, yet that appears to be
contradicted by reports that Pleiadians say they’re part of a
“galactic federation,” which sounds exactly like the IFSP.
-
Secondly,
the
Pleiades star group (purported home of “the Pleiadians”) is only
100 million years old, so life couldn’t have evolved there yet.
Instead, the name of those human-looking aliens should reflect their
origin, which certainly isn't The Pleiades.
*
If US soldiers were to ride into an African city and say “we're from
Africa because we have a base here,” no one would call them
Africans.
Some abductees interviewed by David Jacobs say Nordics were involved
in their abductions.
As Jacobs writes,
” the evidence clearly
suggests that the Nordics are most probably adult hybrids of
human/alien mating.”
(The Threat p. 93)
Abductees told Jacobs that
Nordics have been seen wearing tight-fitting, one piece uniforms,
sometime of a silvery color. Brenda, who was interviewed by Budd
Hopkins, said she was abducted and taken to a base where
grays and
Nordics worked side by side.
At an MIT conference on abductions,
researcher Jenny Randles said her research showed that in Britain,
35% of abductions are by Nordics, 6% of abductions in the United
States are by Nordics, and in Europe 25% are by Nordics (C.D.B.
Bryan p. 68)
In other words, evidence suggests that “Pleiadians” and
Nordics are IFSP aliens.
There are further inconsistencies in “the Pleiadian” story. Given
that aliens have diverse kinds of skin, eyes, and other features
that derive from various evolutionary conditions, it’s unlikely that
aliens who arrive here would just happen to look just like we do.
So, when aliens arrive who look exactly like humans and say they
just happen to be based in our vicinity, something is wrong with
their story.
Biological diversity suggests that humans were taken
from our planet in order to create the Nordic, Semitic and
“Pleiadian” contingents. They appear to be mere props for the IFSP
intervention, fallbacks to be used in a multi-pronged IFSP approach
to humankind. Given that they look like we do, the IFSP would assume
that we might trust them.
Since
Charles Hall says that the tall whites established a base in
Nevada in
1954, the year Eisenhower reportedly met with tall gray
aliens (Emenneger, Sandler 1974),
Michael Salla suggests that tall
whites and tall grays may be related.
If such is true, the fact that
sharp-chinned, tall grays reportedly accompany and give orders to
shorter grays would also suggest a tall white-IFSP status.
There’s
evidence to suggest that tall whites and other hybrid enclaves are
fed selective versions of IFSP propaganda. As airman Charles Hall
writes, a “tall white” alien doctor was astounded to learn that
humans actually feel love. Apparently, he was told otherwise.
In addition, at various junctures, non-IFSP aliens have described
the tall whites as an IFSP dependency. This is alarming news because
it would mean the tall whites were allowed a base near Indian
Springs, NV under false pretenses (they pretended to be anti-gray).
Meanwhile, the tall whites’ status is easy to discern through remote
sensing because their energy and communications network bundles into
that of the Verdants. This has been checked repeatedly (see
'how-to
chapter'), and has been repeatedly underscored by non-IFSP aliens.
Even IFSP and “three ellipticals” aliens
have tacitly admitted it. In their defense, they concede that
multiple approaches are needed for the IFSP strategy. They suggest
that the IFSP’s off-world human-hybridized enclaves number but a
fraction of the human population, yet the scheme is typical of the
Verdant resort to spectacle and excess.
Rather than ask our
permission, they occupied nearby star systems under the pretense of
tending to a brief phase of human evolution. No doubt during
interventions elsewhere they’ve taken some such planets for
themselves.
Now that humans are beginning to discuss the Verdant strategy more
openly, Verdants are reportedly instructing their direct operatives
to spawn conflict here in order to make us more vulnerable. Non-IFSP
aliens have pointed this out repeatedly. They say it’s worse than
most humans would suspect (specific cases have been cited). We’ve
heard Verdants say tthey’ve spent great time and effort on this
planet, as though they deserve a larger role here. They say they’ve
monitored us for centuries.
Again, there’s good reason to suspect that Verdants want to preserve
their home galaxy and use the delta t (the change of time by use of electrogravity and negative energy)
resources of other galaxies,
instead. They may want to spread their negative-cycle network out on
a larger scale so that it favors their preferences.
So, when a hyperversal alien raised the question,
“What do you do when a large
elliptical galaxy begins (to tilt) dangerously?”,
...the subtext was
clear:
Giant ellipticals like M-87 spew vast jets of material from
the axes of their central black holes, which can drastically affect
surrounding galaxies.
Depending on a variety of factors (like
Verdant use of delta t), when Centaurus A begins to tilt it will
affect our local galaxy group.
Verdants and the “three ellipticals”
faction may hope to use our surroundings in order to rig the delta
t/alt t gravitic environment in the Verdants’ favor. But don’t
expect them to admit it - they shirk discussion of the subject,
while competing aliens have suggested that it’s a valid concern.
Back to our main topic. When the notion of physicality is discussed
in the context of alien interactions, the basic message is yes,
we’re all part of a universal whole, but none of us are equal to it.
None of us are solely spirit in that sense. We create waste and have
diseases. Some of us take from others in unequal measure.
* This
certainly doesn’t exclude the possibility of a more enduring realm
of energy, or spirit (a pre-scientific human word). Even aliens talk
about the subject yet do so in more advanced scientific terms (a
hyper-dynamic that only exists or can be observed and seemingly
animated collectively).
Another recurring discussion surrounds the subject of ego, specious
pretensions, and the need to ever expand a given community’s
considerations. Often posed as a larger, more advanced premise, we
hear that larger interactions require a letting go of physical
desires, an end to jockeying for resources.
Some might say, how is
that possible? The answer given, if not seemingly embedded in every
aspect of the continuum, is that those who pose the question haven’t
thought about it carefully enough. The most advanced beings and
interactions must set aside or fade out their sense of themselves in
order to even know the larger community.
The Buddhist notion of selflessness and
non-propagation is analogous. This is the lesson for hyperversal
aliens busied by the schemes and impulses of recently evolved
aliens: reduced use of resource and reduced population, which
requires such beings to spread their awareness and immerse within
lesser aliens’ lives in order to teach them similarly.
In one sense
it’s a more condensed kind of existence, yet in another it’s vastly
more expanded and airy, more subtle.
* Problem cases arise,
nonetheless.
So there’s a built-in conservation. All life can drain or deplete
the possibilities of other lifeforms, hence all must learn from
increasingly larger interactions. Rather than yearn to travel and
enjoy themselves beneath the light of billions of distant stars, as
some Verdants prefer, the majority must seek greater knowledge
inwardly. Otherwise, this universe is toast, and vast contingents of
resource predators will ever grow and contend with each other,
ruining the possibilities for others.
We have to model it all on a universal
scale - over great periods of time, not just our immediate physical
wants and impulses.
There’s a great tradition of the sort.
|