If, as some Hyperversals assert, they’ve been through the mobilizations necessary to extend a universe cycle, it may have required a number of hard decisions. For example, from our current perspective, all aliens intent on surviving such a feat might have had to retreat to remote regions of space before manipulating all known black holes (conceivably leaving the “mass” of some black holes to be used for structure within, and navigation into, the an extended universe cycle).
In such a scenario, advanced aliens wouldn’t wait until the last moment to do so.
Instead, they would either prepare in
advance or might simply configure all that they do so that the
universe is regenerated continuously. They might have to time their
actions to reserve enough energy/time within a given universe cycle
to be able to extend it into a longer-term continuity. That could,
conceivably, require vast sums of energy/time (if we assume an
integrated value for mass/energy and time, as does
Instead, after living for 10-15 billion years as mature, scientific societies they would develop a way to effect, or simply relocate within, a continuous regeneration of the universe.
This raises one basic question.
It’s a cosmological conundrum, yet if we
set aside our assumptions and allow for the fact that with advanced
science and the ability to slip in and around event horizons,
hyperversal aliens may simply view the universe differently than we
do. On the one hand, their universe must be be more condensed,
yet, at the same time, more airy and hyperspatial. Indeed, it’s
conceivable that over time, they must orient all their energy
technologies to conform to a habitable continuity of negative and
Some hyperversals aliens might try to pre-empt
communications between younger populations in order to impose their
preferences, which might cause resentment. Basic accords would be
necessary, all in the name of the larger ecology.
In other words, some of their energy and
population strategies could strain the social fabric of both their
own societies and other, affected populations. New populations like
ours on Earth might see this as a cold shoulder, a deeply withdrawn,
if not insular set of assumptions on the hyperversals’ part. Some
hyperversal populations will have manipulated others toward mass
extinctions or will have used aggressive client populations like the
Verdants to do the same.
It would be dangerous to trust the lives of so many with but one universal regime. Instead, we can assume that peaceful diversity would be safer, due to diversity of origin and diversity of supercluster neighborhoods, assuming, of course, that hyperversals see the same, far-flung kind of universe that we do.
technology allows for a closer interconnectedness.
Some humans may wonder:
From the old
human perspective, that might seem strange, yet if one were to
begin, instead, from a community of mind perspective (being able to
jointly share thoughts freely), the fearful, if not manipulative
pitfalls of concretized individuality might seem even stranger.
Concretized notions of individuality would seem bizarre, if not
primitive - vastly less intelligent.
To some readers, this
may sound premature, as though it needn’t be a concern, at the
moment. To some hyperversals, however, it’s never too soon to begin
planning correctly because the basic
delta t/alt conservation must
be maintained continuously.
So, the truth may be that some
populations like the “three ellipticals” subculture never quite
learn how to reduce their numbers as other aliens might wish they
would. Instead, they may prefer both a sexual and non-sexual, mixed
strategy, and may assume that the universe can be recycled in ways
that are more gradual, yet may seem precipitous from our relatively
primitive perspective on astrophysics.
In our case, by the time we
merge with Andromeda some 3.5 billion years hence, we’ll be
starkly different (probably of mixed alien composition) and will
both map, and model the “visible” universe differently. Our sense of
vision will be remotely hyperspatial, as will our understandings of
dark energy phenomena (like black holes and energy cycles of a uni/multiverse).
Humans are already developing remote sensitivities of the sort.
* If other “three ellipticals”
hyperversals have better models, they aren’t sharing them with us,
From the perspective of populations in the “three ellipticals” corner, only dominance hierarchies and crude manipulations can achieve a universal ecology. From the perspective of other, sometimes independent or variously aggregated hyperversals, the universe may be viewed in more cooperative, if not legalistic terms (transparent agreements between communities).
Deeper interactions and shared ecology inevitably compel larger conventions over time.
So, even if some hyperversal populations fail to manage their numbers proportionally,
all aliens must evolve and must participate in universal