|
29 -
The Notion of Physicality
More recently, quantum physics has teased such concepts into a new light:
Weirder still, there are seemingly infinite energy fluctuations in quantum interactions.
In short, our science is essentially suspended in mid-step with one foot in a primitive past, the other just beginning to test the waters of a profoundly new paradigm.
Meanwhile, alien physics is framed in terms of effects, rather than forces. That may sound like a subtle difference, but it’s not. It’s a major re-framing that allows for greater flexibility and a subtle yet fateful blending of phenomena on a cosmic scale. Concepts that we take for granted (the seeming unity of an atomic particle, the ability to enumerate particles as though each is separately whole-numbered and individual, the solely forward flow of time) are not accepted by aliens.
Aliens begin from a different premise, a
different set of assumptions.
So, we talk about power (use of force to move objects), and possession (control of objects).
It’s a categorically smarter kind of concept, and it
subsumes atomic chemistry. While humans think of themselves as
solid, nothing is solid in the alien view. Nothing.
A more complex universe
is within you, so you must learn to accord within a more complex
universe. For aliens, evolution is in every term of the equation;
it’s always part of their makeup.
I’ve heard and have been involved in many discussions about this with a variety of different aliens.
I’ve heard them compete in such terms re: who is more consistently so, and I’ve heard them quickly resolve disagreements in terms of the common striving. Such considerations are always extant - at times an alien may depart from equal connectedness yet must return to it in order to advance his or her awareness.
There’s almost always another, more evolved society
that a given alien people strive to emulate, hence they must be
co-homologous (shared and included) within higher order
relationships like the universal ecology, larger understandings, and
a greater, finer form of mind. It’s a remarkably peaceful basis.
To be able to do so, aliens take the more civilized step of fading themselves down, in a sense, in order to evacuate themselves into larger continuity (hyperspace).
Usually, the more largely they interact within a greater shared awareness, the more advanced and capable they are. This involves a kind of remote sensing and it models the universe as all-inclusive, as should be the awareness. A major part of this is possible only because of, and is mediated by, larger pre-existing intelligent relationships (this is most important).
Advanced aliens see through
themselves and must continually re-examine or redefine certain basic
assumptions.
Among aliens, sentience is implicit in all shared consciousness, but a given regime can intrude on and color it, one way or another. Although their contacts may seem universal, a selective bias can distort their sense of community of mind. Rather than remain open to the larger, more advanced universe, a regime may frame social identity in terms of its own needs and preferences.
It may speak as though its citizens are all one singular entity, but the universe is actually more varied than that. It’s not all one singular condition, although hyper-advanced kind may favor a subtle shading of the notion.
It isn’t so physical… Which begs the question:
We’ve heard aliens discuss such notions at intervals.
The thinking goes something like this: All aliens are both determined and defined by greater, universal quantities. So in the most advanced form, we interact universally, to some extent, and in our most valid, most capable identity, we’re a community of mind in hyperspace. Individual peculiarities aside, universally valid ideas are, or can be, perpetual. Reportedly, great effort goes into assuring sustainable re-cycling of the universe.
So, in a sense, even though we die, the greater validity, the best of our being, goes on and can conceivably cycle back into other being(s). For example, when we die, do we go to zero, or do we continue to resonate within finer, “less than zero” energy? At the very least, we condition subsequent lives. And the better part of us, an undying higher community of mind, is our striving, hence we must ever be mindful of such.
It’s probably safe to say that most aliens aren’t coldly and mechanically deterministic.
They certainly know about evolution and genetics, but sometimes we hear vague drift about how flawed identity essentially groups itself with other flawed identities (i.e. limited ideas). This occurs in conversations about how greater community of mind compares to relatively backward individuals or groups.
The logical response of some aliens is that none of us are
complete without the larger whole. Instead, we’re all merely
complementary of each other, or fractional in a mathematical sense,
so none exist in complete isolation. The implicit assumption is that
mind is more evolved and capable when we participate and understand
shared community of mind in hyperspace.
Human contact now involves a variety of observing alien populations. Given that we live near a large, open travel corridor that winds through the galaxy just beyond the edge of a Milky Way spiral arm that you see overhead in the night sky, there are various interested populations.
Recently evolved aliens (including humans) engage in discussions either with, or about older populations, and hyperversal aliens of varying duration participate and tend to dominate some discussions. For example, along with other humans I raise objections about IFSP intervention here. You can probably guess which hyperversals suggest that like identities fall in with similar others.
In part, it’s a rationalization of an
off-world policy toward humans and other aliens. In part, it
reflects a certain attitude. Meanwhile, a thoughtful, regenerative
mind can always encompass greater consideration, but that requires
humility. Ultimately, we’re all merely complimentary.
Many aliens expect you to have
pondered how that can be done. They expect you to have thought about
how the entire universe can seem to be both physical yet not made of
solids. In other words, if you know that there must be conservation
in all relationships of all sorts, then how do you both embody and
accord with such? What are you doing to improve both yourself and
your kind in that regard?
If you disregard them entirely, then,
More specifically, alien science and the politics of their interactions point to a succession of universe cycles, an extended continuity.
We’ve heard hyper-advanced aliens’ statements on the subject. That, in turn, suggests that further categories of yet more advanced beings exist and pre-date us, so we must curtail our energy demands and allow for their Δt/alt t needs, even if such beings don’t immediately appear before us when we want them to.
Again,
Given remote sensing in hyperspace, you don’t need to physically go there.
Meanwhile, you’re expected to know that the use
of energy by any and all kinds must be monitored and kept within
certain bounds. Any and every system can be clocked in this regard.
A further, related question arises.
Some advanced aliens say that if we’re too far wrong, we shouldn’t know too much to begin with.
It’s a sensitive issue involving life,
fate, and nearly Tao-like consequences of any behavior. It touches
on the question of whether all people are compatible with community
of mind. It frames the alien view of humankind.
The
most extensive interactions and capabilities are
all-inclusive - they leap far out yet go deeply inward everywhere.
Where, in such identity, is there room for hatred and impulses
toward violence? We’re talking about actual, existing populations,
not abstractions. For us, it’s like walking into a huge stadium
where everyone already knows that.
The Verdant colonial scheme is but one example.
Meanwhile, more humble, considerate aliens and some hyperversals
more closely approximate the greater universal premise.
This is due to the humbling effect of large interactions and group identity, plus the need to reduce population number. Meanwhile, we see aliens with hyper-advanced technology who seem overly preoccupied with physical security (preventing unwanted snoops, averting primitive upstarts, and securing ideal surroundings). It’s a conundrum, especially when their hybrids try to divert you with low-order routines when you investigate them.
They know corruption intimately - from their own experience. There are destabilization schemes by large trading collectives and other regimes, interventions in which vulnerable planets are driven to desperation, then takeover. They know an easy prospect when they see one.
It’s
doubtful that money is used on alien planets because it can be
counterfeited or hoarded then used disproportionately, which can
quickly ruin a planet’s ecology.
Self-interested sociopaths are promoted in government, where they promote cronies, resulting in extremes of crime and secrecy. It’s killing this planet.
The personal attributes that such people regard as strengths (greed, predation, and willingness to steal public resources) are seen as epic weakness on more advanced planets because such people can be compromised and bent to facilitate an alien takeover.
On alien planets, the end of inequality is a watershed event,
starker than was the difference, here, between the Roman Empire and
Christianity.
Meanwhile, the IFSP’s ability to
manipulate conflict here is premised on secrecy, which helps
Verdants gain a foothold. Various reports suggest that IFSP
operatives’ strategy is to worsen economic and religious extremes,
making it difficult for humans to even discuss alien science and
politics. Instead, we see lies in major media and blanket dismissals
of the entire subject - at the worst possible time in human history.
It’s far
worse the Church censorship of Copernicus.
It’s hard to see how humans would agree to that, which poses a yet greater danger.
The IFSP may assume that our opinions don’t matter because
we can be riven and driven toward violence then fed superficial
half-truths, step-by-step, until we’ve been “pacified,” as Summers’
books allege. In order to feed the Verdant empire and provide it
with a trading base for resource grabs along this arm of the Milky
Way galaxy, human freedoms would be ended.
Numerous non-IFSP aliens and my probing indicate that in
order to maximize the IFSP’s chances here, IFSP operatives have
accelerated their strategy of tensions. Now we see a recurrence of
old colonial patterns (domination, subordination, and manipulated
conflicts), which seem like a throwback to primitive times. In part,
that’s due to a regressive lag in Verdant evolution, which has come
to affect us directly.
As is evidenced by Verdant excess, the ruin of the grays’ planet (an IFSP intervention), the grays’ inability to speak on major issues, and the actions of the IFSP’s direct operatives here, the IFSP isn’t held together by democracy and critique. Instead, it was pieced together through harsh manipulation. As Verdants admit, some target planets were killed by deliberate design. Then their resources were easy to take. Mindful of such disasters, we must ask whether specious rationalization has spoiled the judgment of some Verdants.
Even hyperversals admit that self-interest tends to underlie most physical designs on resources. In two-faced fashion, the IFSP has cut secret deals with humans guilty of crimes against humanity, while posing as though the IFSP is above such doings else-where.
Verdants want to be able to say they steered human elites toward transforming crisis, but now that IFSP operatives can be exposed with relative ease, Verdant prospects appear to be diminishing. Those 500 trillion Verdants living on 246,000 planets are a treaty and policy concern for Milky Way aliens. More evolved Milky Way aliens may want to approach us less aggressively so that we can learn by better example.
After all, they
have to live with us forever. Meanwhile, Verdants dart in at the
last moment and tentatively occupy a number of our surrounding star
systems, where they reportedly bred hybrid enclaves to suit their
design (the Nordics and Semitics of Altair, the Tall Whites, and
gray hybrids who
crashed at Roswell fit this pattern).
However, Wolf said both groups were bred by another human-looking
group from the Pleiades star cluster. In other words, they would all
be related. Swiss contactee
Billy Meier’s much-disputed contacts
feature “Pleiadians,” although he now calls them Plejarans.
Instead, the name of those
human-looking aliens should reflect their origin, which certainly
isn't the Pleiades. If US soldiers were to ride into Africa and say
“we're from Africa because we have a base here,” no one would call
them Africans.
As Jacobs writes,
Abductees told Jacobs that Nordics have been seen wearing tight fitting, one-piece uniforms sometimes of a silvery color.
Brenda, who was interviewed by Budd Hopkins, said she was abducted and taken to a base where grays and Nordics worked side by side. At an MIT conference on abductions, researcher Jenny Randles said her research showed that in Britain 35% of abductions are by Nordics, 6% of abductions in the United States are by Nordics, and in Europe 25% are by Nordics. (C.D.B. Bryan p. 68)
In other words, evidence suggests that “Pleiadians” and
Nordics are
IFSP aliens.
The evidence suggests that humans were taken from our planet in order to create the Nordic, Semitic and “Pleiadian” contingents.
They appear to be props for the IFSP intervention, fallbacks to be
used in a multi-pronged IFSP approach to humankind. Given that they
look like we do, the IFSP would assume we might trust them. It
appears to be another IFSP deception.
Charles Hall wrote that Tall Whites were allowed a base in Nevada in 1954, the year Eisenhower reportedly met with tall gray aliens. (Emenneger, Sandler 1974) Because the dates coincide and Tall Whites do secret deals with a black budget cabal, Michael Salla suggests that Tall Whites and tall grays may be related.
If that’s true, the fact that sharp-chinned, tall grays reportedly accompany and give orders to shorter grays would further suggest a Tall White-IFSP status.
The
gray alignment has the strongest motives for having created Tall
Whites. Tall Whites’ arrogance mirrors that of tall grays seen
giving orders to short grays during abductions. The fact that Tall
Whites treat humans like cattle and try to train humans to be
fearful and submissive further suggests that Tall Whites are a
creation of the gray alignment.
In a 2007 interview, Hall said a Tall White female asked him,
At various junctures, non-IFSP aliens here have said that Tall Whites are an IFSP dependency.
This is alarming news because it would mean that back in 1954 Tall Whites were allowed a base next to an Air Force base in Indian Springs, NV under false pretenses (they pretended to be anti-gray). One year earlier, US presidents had been eliminated from direct control of such interactions. Hall reports that US servicemen were ordered to supply the Tall Whites with foodstuffs, technological components, and more.
Worse yet, someone in the US command gave Tall Whites permission to kill US airmen who frightened them while on foot patrol, even though the airmen were never briefed about aliens on base grounds.
As
William Cooper,
former Navy intelligence advisor to the Pacific Fleet Commander, and CSETI witness Steven Lovekin both noted,
Eisenhower felt betrayed by
the Rockefeller faction that removed such interactions from basic,
constitutional controls in order to keep them secret.
Wolf specialized in aliens and said he
advised President Bill Clinton about alien matters. In Wolf’s house,
journalist Paola Harris saw a photo of Bill Clinton signed with
Clinton’s personal thank-you to Wolf.
This has been checked repeatedly (see how-to chapter) and has been repeatedly underscored by non-IFSP aliens. Even IFSP and “three ellipticals” aliens have tacitly admitted it. In their defense, they concede that multiple approaches are needed for the IFSP strategy.
They suggest that the IFSP’s off-world human-hybrid enclaves are
small in number compared to the human population, but the scheme is
typical of Verdant resort to spectacle and excess. Rather than ask
our permission, they occupied nearby star systems under the pretense
of tending to a brief phase of human evolution. No doubt during
interventions elsewhere they’ve taken similar planets for
themselves.
When a hyperversal raised the question,
...the subtext was clear:
Depending on various factors, including Verdant use of Δt/alt t, the way Centaurus A tilts and spews its giant plumes of material could affect its entire galaxy group.
* See its giant plumes at www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080110150936.htm Verdants and the “three ellipticals” faction may hope to use our surroundings in order to rig the Δt/alt t gravitic environment in the their favor. But don’t expect them to admit it - they shirk discussion of the subject, while competing aliens have suggested that it’s a valid concern. Centaurus A (below image) poses a refugee and energy ecology dilemma that may be used to rationalize “three ellipticals” policy regarding Verdants.
Finally, it’s possible that hyperversals, themselves, use energy in a way that directly affects the Δt/alt t ecology, the spatial configuration, and the gravitic orientation of all galaxies in the universe.
The topic has been mentioned by hyperversals.
None of us are solely spirit in that sense.
We create waste and have diseases. Some of us take from others in
unequal measure. This certainly doesn’t exclude the possibility of a
more enduring realm of energy, or spirit. Even aliens talk about the
subject yet do so in more advanced scientific terms (a hyper-dynamic
that only exists or can be observed and seemingly animated
collectively).
The answer given, if not seemingly embedded in every aspect of the continuum, is that those who pose the question haven’t thought about it carefully enough.
The most advanced beings and interactions must fade out their sense of themselves in order to even know the larger community. The Buddhist notion of selflessness and non-propagation is analogous. The lesson for hyper-advanced aliens busied by the schemes and impulses of recently evolved aliens is clear: reduce resource use and reduce population, which requires such beings to spread their awareness and immerse within younger aliens’ lives in order to teach them similarly.
In a sense it’s a more condensed kind
of existence, yet it’s also more expanded and airy, more subtle
(just like hyperspace).
Otherwise, this universe is toast, and vast contingents of
resource predators will grow and contend
with each other, ruining the possibilities for others. We must model
it all on a universal scale - over great periods of time, not on our
physical wants and impulses. There’s a great tradition of the sort.
The IFSP now tries to keep alien-related US programs semi-private to maintain secrecy and influence us without public discussion and expose. As far as we know, no aliens, anywhere - certainly no hyperversals - have yet told humans about “private” alien space ventures, probably because they don’t exist.
Tiny IFSP puppet enclaves may pretend otherwise, but to them that’s a dog and pony sideshow for human primitives.
|
