Further Dangers of Electrogravity
Such dangers are due to Δt, the speeding of time caused by the fact that electrogravity and magnetogravity (gravitics) borrow large amounts of energy from empty space in order to exceed the speed of light. The negative cycle that defines electrogravity connects small, exotic “negative energy” fluctuations of space-time. Ultimately, such fluctuations can resonate across great distances because the universe has no outer edge. Instead, hyperspace connects phenomena on a cosmic scale to fluctuations on a micro-scale.
And when negative energy fluctuations
connect via electrogravity and magnetogravity, they slightly change
the flow of time.
But what happens when electrogravity is used directly on humans during
psychotronic communications, or during “soft” weapons use? Are there
Worse yet, if electrogravity/magnetogravity is used directly on humans, it can speed the clock on human gene structures, which is dangerous because human genes have a limited number of telomeres, structures that shorten in length each time a cell replicates. Since electrogravity speeds time in areas surrounding its focus, it could shorten telomeres and prematurely age human tissue during abductions and other uses.
Again, this is due to Bearden’s Δt, a basic universal energy conservation.
This is partly why aliens genetically engineer themselves to tolerate such radiation both during travel and while using psychotronic technology. Ironically, when gravitics are used in finely-adjusted, advanced ways they should allow for longer cell life and hardier living systems, i.e. when doing direct energy feed to body cells, re-configuration of genetic material to retard aging, accelerated healing, and replacement of damaged cells.
aren’t achieved overnight, however. As was noted earlier, hyperversal aliens know how to deftly converge and cancel out
multiple categories of gravitic energy by spreading it out so that
the effects aren’t so immediately local, which minimizes the
apparent speeding of time (albeit at a Δt cost to the larger
continuum). Again, this is the “alt t” that some hyperversals have
By now, Verdants, who reportedly live longer than other IFSP aliens, should be able to either minimize Δt or possibly alt-cycle it, which may help to explain why they live so long. Nonetheless, the fact that other IFSP aliens haven’t been afforded the same life-prolonging health care suggests that we shouldn’t always expect IFSP aliens to use gravitics on humans in healthy ways.
There are political and resource issues
surrounding the question of who lives longest to be best educated in
a large collective like the IFSP. That’s complicated by the
emotional desensitization that comes with greatly extended lifetime.
This poses a dilemma for all aliens.
To recklessly shorten the duration of an entire
universe cycle would be irresponsible, hence, as humans are now
beginning to learn, larger conventions regarding the use of gravitic
technology appear to have been discussed - long before the appearance
of human civilization.
Some situations of the sort involve manipulation of less developed,
less capable populations. In such cases, a more advanced population
may think it has achieved a relative mastery of negative cycle
technology. Nonetheless, there may be gaps in the knowledge of
aliens who evolved such technology within the last billion years or
so. They may not know the extent to which gravitic technologies
affect the duration of a universe cycle.
On the one hand, we need to know more
about the extent of such effects on the calculable long-term
duration of both quanta and the larger universe/multiverse. On the
other hand, hyper-advanced aliens appear to be dead serious about
the subject - they appear to judge lesser populations in terms of
their regard for the larger Δt/alt t ecology. Their concern has been
mentioned over and over again. It frames larger conventions and much
of the off-world policy of hyper-advanced populations, apparently.
Then again, Verdant expansion tends to kill off certain planets and make non-sexuals of various others. So, in the end, although Verdants make heinous mistakes, some hyperversal hard-liners rationalize Verdant excess as having eliminated aggressive Δt and weapons violators. There has been abundant off-world chatter about the subject.
Some discussions of the sort
are highly pitched and involve vast-scale controversies, questions
of law and basic decency. These are major debates that affect us
now. They should be discussed by human governments. Such issues loom
highly in debates and analysis about how newly technological
populations will evolve in a finite universe.
I’ve notified Verdant females about criminal behaviors among some of their male counterparts.
Due to heavy-handed pressures in their bureaucracy (planet killers), few are expected to speak out. Imagine how it is: an entire planet could be ruined - what kind of minds would you be up against?
non-sexuals in the IFSP seem to better understand that Verdant
crimes can damage their external relations and deepen collective
security counter-measures against them. Given some nonsexuals’
skepticism of Verdants’ ability to meet supercluster standards at
present, some IFSP non-sexuals may opt for alternative channels or
home planet groups that study Verdant behavior of the sort.
To an astute nonsexual, that’s so obvious that it’s mathematically explicit, yet for a typical Verdant the career and resource needs of a population of 500 trillion living on 246,000 different planets may seem a greater factor.
Better yet, collective security arrangements between galaxies can limit crimes by crude upstarts or colonizers like Verdants. A more advanced kind of interaction must limit weapons and planet grabs. It must reserve terra for evolving species and other scenarios.
The alt-cycle resonance of hyperspace allows for rigorous
monitoring of the larger ecology, plus up-to-date reporting among
However, the more honest and universally consistent population tends to be smarter and have a more enduring basis for such assessments.
should also be open to greater, transparently standardized
networking (hyperversals certainly are). After preliminary probing
of an intruder, the defending population may use negative-cycle
technology (and Δt) to temporarily disable an offending craft then
warn it to leave the area. Should the offender persist, the crisis
can escalate into a larger mobilization or appeals to the larger
community for help in isolating the offender.
As numerous friendly aliens have stated over time, humans can compete with technologically more advanced aliens. Humans need not feel vulnerable to the point of submission.