| 
			 
			  
			
			
			 
			 
			
			  
			by Andrew Moseman 
			
			December 01, 2010 
			
			from
			
			DiscoverMagazine Website 
			
			 
  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			  
			
			A study by Yale astronomer Pieter van Dokkum just took the estimated number of stars in the 
			universe - 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (1022), or 100 sextillion - and 
			tripled it.  
			
			  
			
			And you thought nothing good ever happens on Wednesdays... 
			
			  
			
			Van Dokkum's
			study in the journal Nature (A 
			Substantial Population of Low-Mass Stars in Luminous Elliptical 
			Galaxies) focuses on
			
			red dwarfs, a class of small, cool
			stars.  
			
			  
			
			They're so small and cool, in fact, that up to now 
			astronomers haven't been able to spot them in galaxies outside our 
			own.  
			
			  
			
			That's a serious holdup when you're trying to account for all 
			the stars there are. 
			
				
				As a consequence, when estimating how 
			much of a galaxy's mass stars account for - important to 
			understanding a galaxy's life history - astronomers basically had to 
			assume that the relative abundance of red-dwarf stars found in the 
			Milky Way held true throughout the universe for every galaxy type 
			and at every epoch of the universe's evolution, Dr. van Dokkum says. 
				 
				
					
					"We always knew that was sort of a stretch, but it was the only 
			thing we had. Until you see evidence to the contrary you kind of go 
			with that assumption," he says.  
				 
				
				
				
				Christian 
			Science Monitor 
			 
			
			But van Dokkum's team, using the Keck 
			Observatory in Hawaii, surveyed eight elliptical
			galaxies nearby (between about 50 and 300 million light years 
			away) for these dim stars.  
			
			  
			
			Their spectrometer could catch the 
			collective signature of these faraway red dwarfs and estimate how 
			many of them the neighbor galaxies harbor. 
			
			  
			
			In the Milky Way there 
			are about 100 red dwarfs for every one star like the sun, but in 
			these galaxies that number may be more like 1,000 to one. 
			
				
				Elliptical galaxies are some of the 
			largest galaxies in the universe. The largest of these galaxies were 
			thought to hold more than 1 trillion stars (compared with the 400 
			billion stars in our Milky Way).  
				  
				
				The new finding suggests there may 
			be five to 10 times as many stars inside
				elliptical galaxies than previously thought, which would triple 
			the total number of known stars in the universe, researchers said. 
				
				
				
				Space.com 
			 
			
			While van Dokkum's Nature paper 
			was released to the public today, it's been raising a more private 
			ruckus already: 
			
				
				For the past month, astronomers have 
			been buzzing about van Dokkum's findings, and many aren't too happy 
			about it, said astronomer Richard Ellis of the California Institute 
			of Technology.  
				  
				
				Van Dokkum's paper challenges the assumption of, 
				
					
					"a 
			more orderly universe" and gives credence to "the idea that the 
			universe is more complicated than we think," Ellis said. 
					 
					  
					
					"It's a 
					little alarmist."  
				 
				
				Ellis said it is too early to tell if van Dokkum 
			is right or wrong, but it is shaking up the field "like a cat among 
				pigeons."  
				
				  
				
				Van Dokkum agreed, saying, 
				 
				
					
					"Frankly, it's a big pain." 
				 
				
				
				AP 
			 
			
			And besides tripling the number of stars 
			in the universe (isn't that enough???) and infuriating some 
			astronomers, van Dokkum's find has some serious secondary 
			implications.  
			
			  
			
			More stars, of course, means the opportunity for 
			more 
			planets, and many recently found
			exoplanets orbit red dwarfs.  
			
			  
			
			That 
			includes, 
			
				
			 
			
			Furthermore, the plethora of red dwarfs 
			could explain a 
			
			dark matter mystery: 
			
				
				Elliptical galaxies posed a problem: The 
			motions of the stars they contained implied that they had more mass 
			than one would get by adding the mass of the normal matter 
			astronomers observed to the expected amount of dark matter in the 
			neighborhood.  
				  
				
				Some suggested that ellipticals somehow had extra dark 
			matter associated with them. Instead, the newly detected red dwarfs 
			could account for the difference, van Dokkum says. 
				
				
				
				Christian 
			Science Monitor 
			 
			
			  
			
			 
			  |