Their idea was to not dignify the movement with any recognition, so as not to bring any more attention to it. But that was before Trump rallies across the country started showing a growing number of supporters sporting Q shirts and posters.
Deep State must have
figured that not saying something would be more harmful to their
grip on the steering wheel than saying something, clumsy as it may
look for them to be suddenly weighing in on this matter en masse
after being collectively silent for so long.
Beyond these basic facts, mainstream media is holding a concerted front on this one point: we don't know who Q is, but we think probably, likely, with 99.9% certainty, that it's nonsense.
It is 'conspiracy
theory,' and we know all conspiracy theories are nonsense.
Here's an interesting example where a CNN writer calls upon the Daily Beast's Will Sommer who, the writer opines, 'has been writing and thinking smartly about QAnon since its inception':
In one fell swoop, it's like mainstream media is trying to bring us back to a simpler time when the ridicule bestowed upon 'conspiracy theory' was at the height of its influence.
One of the real disconnects here is that Sommer implies that most people still don't believe there was a conspiracy (a plan made by more than one person) to assassinate John F. Kennedy, when we actually live in a time in which a majority of people believe this and other well-known 'conspiracies' to be fact.
In fact a March poll by
Politico reveals that belief in the Deep State is not the
stuff of fringe groups, and is only growing:
But mainstream media really hasn't got many other options, do they?
Mainstream media is in a
full-on quandary: many people who work within these organizations
don't understand how the world works and how information is
Hence they cannot talk accurately about Q, even if some within those organizations want to, because to do so would be to admit that they worked for criminally-owned, truth-distorting news organizations.
The only way the mainstream can report on Q is through the divisive polemic story filters like Right Wing/Left Wing, Trump Lovers/Trump Haters they have been indoctrinated into, which as we shall see cannot be employed to truly understand what Q is.
There is much speculation about who Q is but general agreement that the Q posts are informed by a group of insiders.
The whole phenomena of the Q posts is considered part of an intelligence operation that is coming from white hats within intelligence communities.
Some believe public figures such as,
...and other prominent
whistleblowers, who have been on the inside and know what is going
on, may have a hand in the information behind this operation.
Regardless of the initial intentions, it seems now that Q has embraced its role as a purveyor of updates to the public of the progress being made behind the scenes, in recognition of the fact that an informed and engaged public can only help matters in disclosing the truth and defeating the Deep State.
In this way, it dovetails nicely with those who believe a mass awakening to the truth is needed in order for us to remove the need and withdraw our consent for a controlling authority like the Deep State to operate at all.
They will try to hem and haw about how people on the far right are desperate to believe something good is happening through their hero Donald Trump since we are living in such tumultuous times.
But that is completely
inaccurate, if one examines who was paying attention to Q posts on
4chan early on and what they were saying about it.
They were versed in the revelations of Julian Assange and Edward Snowdon, revelations which the mainstream media has given up directly calling 'conspiracy theories' because they are commonly accepted as fact.
They were not Donald Trump supporters per se except in regards to the idea that he was not a member of the Deep State (like Hillary Clinton is known to be).
Most were a bit skeptical
of Donald Trump's promise to 'Drain the Swamp,' although they
certainly knew by then that there was a swamp that needed draining.
The reason that the mainstream media is floundering so much these days is that they are trying to discredit as 'conspiracy theory' many things that to the diligent researcher are only one degree of separation from things that are commonly accepted to be true, such as the revelations of Assange, Snowdon and others.
But for most serious
researchers, Trump is a figurehead for an alliance group that
probably has its roots in the time of JFK and really became
the 9/11 massacre.
An untethered Donald Trump would surely be making direct references to the flattering advances of Q posts if left to his own devices.
Instead, questions about Q are answered in very indirect and circumspect ways, such as this recent response from such a question by White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders:
For many researchers, however, Trump and the White House have dropped hints, Q-style, that he not only acknowledges the movement but is intimately connected to it.
The best way to explore these examples is by looking here.
You will notice pictures, Q posts, time stamps and so forth as they relate to posts Trump or the White House made AFTER the Q posts.
As with many things in our world today, our personal discernment is needed in order for us to draw our own conclusions.
What seems obvious,
however, is that even the scantest research done a little below the
surface will reveal that the mainstream media characterization of Q
has little resemblance to reality.