by Jon Rappoport
contributed by JeremyA
Investigative journalist Jon Rappoport has a clear
understanding of modern and historic Technocracy,
and is able to paint a crystal-clear word picture on
where it is taking us in the near future.
the basic agenda
global society from above,
so we need to
Consider a group of enthusiastic forward-looking engineers in the
early 20th century.
They work for a
company that has a contract to manufacture a locomotive.
This is a highly complex
piece of equipment.
On one level, workers are required to make the components to spec.
Then they must put them all together.
These tasks are formidable.
On another level, various departments of the company must coordinate
This is also viewed as a technological job.
considered a technology...
When the locomotive is
finished and delivered, and when it runs on its tracks and pulls a
train, a great and inspiring victory is won.
And then…the engineers begin to think about the implications.
locomotive was society itself?
Suppose society was
the finished product?
Couldn't society be
put together in a coordinated fashion?
And couldn't the
"technology of organizing things" be utilized for the job?
Why bother with endlessly arguing and lying politicians?
Why should they be in
Isn't that an obvious
Of course it is...
But engineers could lay out and build a future society that would
benefit all people.
Hunger, disease, and
poverty could be wiped out...
would be part of the uncompromising blueprint...
This "insight" hit
engineers and technicians like a ton of bricks. Of course...!
All societies had been
failures for the same reason:
the wrong people were
Armed with this new
understanding, engineers of every stripe began to see what was
A revolution in
thinking about societal organization.
Science was the new
And science would
Of course, for an
engineered world to work, certain decisions would have to be made
about the role of the individual. Every individual.
You couldn't have an
air-tight plan if every human were free to pursue his own
Too many variables.
Too much confusion.
Too much conflict.
Well, that problem could
actions would be tailored to fit the coordinated operations of
the planned society.
The individual would be inserted into a pre-ordained slot.
He would be,
"one of the
components of the locomotive."
His life would be
connected to other lives to produce an exemplary shape.
Yes, this could imply a
few problems, but those problems could be worked out.
They would have to be
worked out, because the overriding goal was the forming of
a world organization.
What would you do if one
bolt (an individual human) in one wheel of a locomotive was the
wrong size? You would go back and correct the error. You would
re-make the bolt.
Among sincere technocrats, the overall vision superseded the glaring
But…other people entered the game.
High-echelon Globalists saw
technocracy as a system they could use to control the
population. Control was their goal. Period...
What happened to the
individual in the process was of no concern to them. The individual
had freedom or he didn't have freedom, and the Globalists overtly
intended to wipe out that freedom.
Erasing hunger, poverty, illness? Nonsense.
For the Globalists, those
realities would be exacerbated.
Sick, weak, and
debilitated people were easier to rule and control and manage.
Essentially, a vastly misguided vision of a future technocratic
utopia was hijacked. Something bad was made much worse.
In a nutshell, this is the history
A locomotive is a society? No.
That was the first
fatally flawed idea. Everything that followed was increasingly
people in our world believe in
Globalism, if you could call a
partial vague view a legitimate belief.
They dreamily float on
all the propaganda cover stories:
greatest good for
the greatest number of
no more poverty
a green economy
production and consumption of goods and services for the
betterment of everyone,
...and all of this
delivered from a central platform of altruistic guides.
If you track down the specifics that sit under these pronouncements,
you discover you discover a warped system of planning that delivers
misery and de facto slavery to the
The collective utopia turns out to be a sham.
Waking up is hard to
Breaking up is hard
They must be done...
A workable technological fix is a very nice achievement when the
project is a machine. But transferring that glow of victory to the
whole of society is an illusion.
Anything that calls
itself education would tackle the illusion as the first order of