| 
			  
			
			
 
  by Michael Snyder
 May 13, 2015
 
			from
			
			EndOfTheAmericanDream Website 
			  
			  
			  
			  
			
			       
			Will a
			UN Security 
			Council resolution formally recognizing the establishment of a 
			Palestinian state be passed by the end of 2015?    
			Now that
			
			the Vatican has formally recognized a Palestinian state, 
			there is a tremendous amount of international momentum for precisely 
			such a UN Security Council resolution.    
			In fact, France
			
			plans to push really hard for one by the end of this year.
			   
			At this point, the only thing that could 
			derail those plans is Barack Obama. For years, the threat of a 
			Security Council veto has been the one thing stopping a resolution 
			from moving forward.    
			But now that Benjamin Netanyahu 
			has been re-elected and has put together a cabinet that does not 
			seem inclined to negotiate with the Palestinians, the Obama 
			administration is pledging to "reevaluate our approach" and says 
			that it will not "prejudge" what it will do if a vote comes up at 
			
			the United Nations.    
			And as you will see below, one news 
			source is now reporting that behind the scenes 
			
			Barack Obama has already given the "green light" for 
			France to go ahead with a resolution on a Palestinian state at the 
			UN.    
			If this is truly what Obama plans to do, 
			it will absolutely shatter U.S. relations
			
			with Israel and plunge the entire 
			Middle East into chaos.   
			Most Americans don't realize this, but 
			136 countries already formally recognize a Palestinian state. Those 
			136 nations have a combined population of more than 5.5 billion 
			people.   
			As of this moment, the major holdouts 
			are the United States, Canada, Mexico, Australia, New Zealand and 
			most of Europe. But most of the European nations have already 
			indicated that they are ready to recognize a Palestinian state if 
			the United States will. In fact, as I mentioned above, France plans 
			to lead the push for a Palestinian state at the UN Security Council.   
			The "State of Palestine" already has "non-member 
			observer" status at the UN, but obviously they are not satisfied 
			with that. They have been very eager for formal recognition by the 
			UN, and now that the Vatican has given them formal recognition that 
			has really bolstered their cause.    
			The following is from a CNN 
			article about the Vatican announcement that stunned the world on 
			Wednesday… 
				
				The Vatican announced Wednesday that 
				it had brokered a treaty with the "state of Palestine," 
				upsetting Israeli advocates and propelling Pope Francis into the 
				heart of yet another geopolitical fray.   
				The treaty is expected to be signed 
				"in the near future," the Vatican said. Mahmud Abbas, president 
				of the Palestinian Authority, is scheduled to visit Pope Francis 
				on Saturday, the day before the church canonizes two Palestinian 
				nuns.   
				The treaty is thought to mark the 
				first time the Holy See has formally recognized Palestinian 
				statehood in a legal document. 
			Of course this didn't come out of a 
			vacuum. The truth is that the Vatican has been moving in this 
			direction for quite some time.    
			Just consider what the 
			Washington Post had to say about the matter… 
				
				The move should not be too great a 
				surprise. Since the U.N. General Assembly voted to recognize 
				Palestine as a "non-member 
				observer state" in 2012, the Vatican has referred to the 
				"state of Palestine" in
				
				its communiqués.    
				When Pope Francis
				
				visited the Holy Land last year, the official Vatican 
				program referred to Palestinian Authority President Mahmud 
				Abbas as the leader of the "state of Palestine."    
				And the pontiff
				
				publicly referred to the "state of Palestine" at a speech in 
				the West Bank. 
			Now that the Vatican has done this, 
			international pressure on Obama to support a UN Security Council 
			resolution on a Palestinian state is increasing.   
			When the UN Security Council resolution 
			being drafted by France comes up for a vote later this year, what 
			will Obama do?   
			Well, according to Debka, 
			Obama has already given the "green light" for France to move 
			forward… 
				
				US President Barack Obama did not 
				wait for Benyamin Netanyahu to finish building his new 
				government coalition by its deadline at midnight Wednesday, May 
				6, before going into action to pay him back for forming a 
				right-wing cabinet minus any moderate figure for resuming 
				negotiations with the Palestinians.   
				Banking on Netanyahu's assertion 
				while campaigning for re-election that there would be no 
				Palestinian state during his term in office, Obama is reported 
				exclusively by our sources 
				to have given the hitherto withheld green light to European 
				governments to file a UN Security Council motion proclaiming an 
				independent Palestinian state. 
			Not only that, Debka 
			is also reporting that members of the Obama administration have 
			actually traveled to France to help draft the resolution… 
				
				
				To show the administration was in earnest, senior 
				US officials sat down with their French counterparts in Paris 
				last week to sketch out the general outline of this motion.
				   
				According to our sources, they began 
				addressing such questions as the area of the Palestinian state, 
				its borders, security arrangements between Israel and the 
				Palestinians and whether or not to set a hard-and-fast timeline 
				for implementation, or phrase the resolution as a general 
				declaration of intent.   
				Incorporating a target date in the 
				language would expose Israel to Security Council sanctions for 
				non-compliance. 
			If what Debka is reporting is accurate, 
			this represents a massive betrayal of Israel by the Obama 
			administration.   
			However, the 
			Jerusalem Post is reporting just the opposite.    
			They are reporting that Obama plans to 
			veto the French resolution… 
				
				US President Barack Obama has told 
				associates that he intends to veto the French proposal for a UN 
				Security Council resolution mandating the creation of a 
				Palestinian state and an Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank 
				within two years, Channel 10 is reporting on Friday.   
				French Foreign Minister Laurent 
				Fabius said this past March that Paris planned to start 
				discussions with partners in the "coming weeks" on a United 
				Nations Security Council resolution to lay out the parameters 
				for ending the Middle East conflict. 
					
					"I hope that the partners who were 
				reluctant will not be reluctant anymore," said Fabius, referring 
				to the United States, which has traditionally shielded its ally 
				Israel from any action at the United Nations. 
			So what is the truth?   
			Only time will tell.   
			But what we do know is that Obama was 
			absolutely furious when Netanyahu promised during his most recent 
			campaign that there would not be a Palestinian state as long as he 
			was in office.   
			And we do know that the Obama 
			administration has pledged to "reevaluate our approach" and has said 
			that it will not "prejudge 
			what we would do if there was a U.N. action"… 
				
				The U.S. would "reevaluate our 
				approach" based on Netanyahu's "change in his position," White 
				House Press Secretary Josh Earnest told reporters as the 
				president flew to Cleveland to deliver a speech on economic 
				policy.   
				State Department spokeswoman Jen 
				Psaki raised the possibility that the reevaluation could include 
				a shift in position at the U.N. She avoided the usual U.S. 
				language about vetoing Security Council resolutions that Israel 
				opposes. 
					
					"The prime minister's recent 
				statements call into question his commitment to a two-state 
				solution," Psaki told reporters. "We're not going to prejudge 
				what we would do if there was a U.N. action." 
			In the final analysis it is so hard to 
			tell exactly what Obama will do, because as he has shown
			over and over again, lying comes as naturally to him as 
			breathing does.   
			However, I think that we can get some 
			clues about how obsessed Obama is with the establishment of a 
			Palestinian state from public statements that he has made throughout 
			his presidency.    
			The following quotes from Barack Obama 
			regarding the need for a Palestinian state come from
			previous articles…   
				
				
				
				#1 "Negotiations will 
				be necessary, but there's little secret about where they must 
				lead: two states for two peoples"   
				
				
				#2 "And I think 
				everybody understands the outlines of what a peace deal would 
				look like, involving a territorial compromise on both sides 
				based on ‘67 lines with mutually agreed upon swaps, that would 
				ensure that Israel was secure but would also ensure that the 
				Palestinians have a sovereign state in which they can achieve 
				the aspirations that they've held for so long."   
				
				
				#3 "The only way for 
				Israel to endure and thrive as a Jewish and democratic state is 
				through the realization of an independent and viable Palestine"   
				
				
				#4 "Neither occupation 
				nor expulsion is the answer. Just as Israelis built a state in 
				their homeland, Palestinians have a right to be a free people in 
				their own land."   
				
				
				#5 "Let me be clear: 
				The United States strongly supports the goal of two states, 
				Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security. 
				That is a goal shared by Palestinians, Israelis, and people of 
				goodwill around the world. That is a goal that the parties 
				agreed to in the road map and at Annapolis. That is a goal that 
				I will actively pursue as President of the United States."   
				
				
				#6 "…we continue to 
				believe that a two-state solution is the only way for the 
				long-term security of Israel, if it wants to stay both a Jewish 
				state and democratic"   
				
				
				#7 "It is not fair that 
				a Palestinian child cannot grow up in a state of her own, and 
				lives with the presence of a foreign army that controls the 
				movements of her parents every single day."   
				
				
				#8 "None of us are 
				under any illusion that this would be easy. As I said in my 
				speech this morning, it has already entailed significant 
				political risk by President Abbas, as well as Prime Minister 
				Netanyahu. But I think the reason that they've been willing to 
				take those risks is they realize this is the best way, the only 
				way, for us to achieve what should be our goal: two states 
				living side-by-side in peace and security. It's right for 
				Palestinian children. It's right for Israeli children."   
				
				
				#9 "Just as the Israeli 
				people have the right to live in the historic homeland of the 
				Jewish people, the Palestinian people deserve the right to 
				self-determination. Palestinian children have hopes and dreams 
				for their future and deserve to live with the dignity that can 
				only come with a state of their own."   
				
				
				#10 "The only solution 
				is a democratic, Jewish state living side-by-side in peace and 
				security with a viable, independent Palestinian state." 
				In the end, I believe that Barack 
				Obama is going to choose to betray Israel at the United Nations, 
				and it will have very serious ramifications that will literally 
				be felt all over the planet. 
			    |