13/11 Paris Massacre
- A Qui Profite Le Crime?
Yesterday night things changed in an instant in Paris.
The available evidence suggest that the assaults were carried out by a professional killer group who used live bombs among other weapons.
Today's post by Pepe Escobar on his Facebook page sheds some light on symbolism and timing of the massacre:
As always, the honest response to the question cui bono might be the last (and perhaps major) victim of the 13/11 tragedy in Paris.
Several strong voices in favor of internal false flag version have already appeared, while the weak French government and secret services totally relying on 'American partners' are hardly possessing enough resources to orchestrate the drama of such scale.
The underline reading of the hot-caked Stratfor report on the Paris attacks (certainly presuming undutiful and entire Islamic State involvement) suggests that the American neocons want to see a bigger French boot on the ground in Syraq.
(More elaboration on NATO's mobilization as a result of 13/11 is done by Patrick Henningsen from 21st Century Wire.)
They were also not satisfied by the French resilience to fully tumble into the pan-European refugee turmoil and general public indifference to anti-Islamic provocateurs from Charlie Hebdo.
The only side effect bothering Stratfor analysts is the apparent rise of Marine Le Pen which, according to them, should be nipped by setting Nikolas Sarkozy at the same electoral field.
As a matter of fact, the bloody night in Paris was launched to definitely bury the European project as it was originally seen in Paris and Berlin - economically powerful and politically sovereign concert of nations.
The symbolism of attacks' initiation near Stad du France during the France-Germany friendly match is obvious.
We will not be surprised if the French investigation of the attack would discover a clear German trace of the perpetrators. The rules of the genre demand such storyline.
Very few in Europe are still taking seriously the immutable fact that the European Union allied with the Eurasian resource base is even a bigger nightmare for the Wall Street owners than the established Russia-China alliance (please read more on the issue in our yesterday's update Grandmaster Putin's Trap-2).
The incumbent Wall Street-controlled EU bureaucracy is rapidly loosing not only public support in the European countries (it is mauvais ton in Brussels to raise this question for long already), but of the local business elites and other power groups.
Replacement of the old EU bureaucracy by new representatives who would take the way of sovereignization of Europe was at the public request in the continent and seriously challenged the transatlantic partnership (didn't you forget French trade minister Matthias Fekl threat to quit TTIP talks last month?).
Reinforcing the latter was the urgent task of the Wall Street political stooges on both sides of the ocean.
Once the Ukrainian project factually failed and due to the notable shift in French approach towards the European Eastern policy, a foundation of the new transatlantic consensus was desperately needed.
Black banner nearby Eiffel was virtually hoisted on the screens to disguide people from much more acute issues:
So cui bono from this attack? A qui profite le crime, France?
The propaganda cartoon,
distributed on Saturday by the 'USA Today'
confirms the conclusions of this commentary.