
	February 23, 2012
	from 
	EconomicNoise Website
	
	 
	
	 
	
	
	
	
	 
	
	When a country is as far gone as Greece, major 
	changes occur, if for no other reason than the Herb Stein truism: when 
	things cannot continue, they won’t.
	
	As reported by 
	
	Mish on 2/21:
	
		
		As a point of curiosity, the 
		
		Greek 1-Year 
		Bond Yield touched 682% today, now down to a mere 666%. Bloomberg quotes 
		the open as 566%, if correct, the one year yield soared 116 percentage 
		points from the open to the high.
	
	
	Greece almost certainly will leave the Eurozone. 
	When this occurs, a new currency will be adopted. 
	
	 
	
	Whether it is called the drachma or something 
	else is irrelevant; it will be a new currency.
 
	
	 
	
	 
	
	
	Changing Currency
	
	A new currency provides unusual opportunities for political predation.
	
	
	 
	
	The initial conditions of exchange are set by 
	politicians, not markets. Additional legislation generally accompanies such 
	a change. This legislation can include forced payment of contracts in the 
	new currency and a host of other mandates. 
	
	 
	
	
	
	 
	
	Opportunities to redistribute 
	wealth via the initial conversion terms and the accompanying new laws make 
	politicians salivate. 
	
	 
	
	Such events may represent the ultimate in 
	political theft.
 
	
	 
	
	 
	
	
	Greece and Europe
	
	This discussion will focus on Greece, although it is applicable to other 
	European countries that may leave the Eurozone or any other country which 
	issues a new currency. 
	
	 
	
	If the Euro ceases to exist, every European 
	country would qualify. The United States is a special case, offering even 
	greater possibilities for political chicanery as will be discussed in a 
	later section.
	
	What should the conversion rate be between the Euro and the new drachma? 
	Markets will eventually determine the fair rate, but that will differ from 
	the rate initially dictated by Greek political authorities. There are few 
	precedents for such transitions and room for mistakes, either deliberate or 
	otherwise. One advantage that Greece will have is a competing currency.
	
	
	 
	
	Even after the change, Euros will presumably 
	circulate freely within Greece. 
	
	 
	
	That provides a certain amount of protection for 
	Greek citizens in that they can arbitrage between drachmas and Euros 
	(Gresham’s Law) to use the more favorable one for transactions.
	
	The greater risk is the legislation that accompanies the new currency.
	
	
		
			- 
			
			Will old contracts denominated in Euros 
			be forced to be honored in drachmas? 
- 
			
			If so, will they be honored at the 
			original conversion rate or at the then prevailing market rate?
			 
- 
			
			Will government dictate that its 
			obligations translate into drachmas at the initial conversion rate?
			 
- 
			
			Will different contracts and classes of 
			citizens be treated equally?  
	
	These are all issues subject to political 
	shenanigans.
	
	Regardless of how these issues are decided, the citizens of Greece are in 
	for a painful transition. One thing is virtually certain; the terms 
	established will favor those setting them - the Greek political class.
	
	
	 
	
	The well-being of its citizens will be a 
	concern, but only a secondary one. 
	
	 
	
	As any government today, foremost in the 
	considerations will be how they can best improve their own (the 
	politician’s, government’s and their favored group’s) positions without 
	getting thrown out of office or suffering an even worse fate. That is the 
	modern motivation of The State, be it Greece or any other country. 
	
	 
	
	The State will exploit the population to 
	whatever degree it can, so long as it doesn’t jeopardize its own survival.
 
	
	 
	
	 
	
	
	How Does Greece Depart 
	The Euro?
	
	The manner in which Greece separates from the Euro is unknown. That likely will not be for much longer as 
	Greece, its population and its neighbors are out of time, money and 
	patience. 
	
	 
	
	
	
	This account, second or third-hand, purports to know how such a 
	departure will occur. Its validity is questionable and it is presented only 
	as an example of one possibility. 
	
	 
	
	According to the author and a supposed document 
	he obtained:
	
		
		The document asserts that Greece will 
		officially be declared in default by all the ratings agencies after the 
		close of business on Friday march 23rd. At the weekend all Greek bank 
		accounts will be frozen, with emergency measures detailed to prevent the 
		flight of capital. 
		 
		
		Included in the paperwork is a list of very 
		limited exceptions to the ‘no withdrawals’ order. All major banks ‘are 
		instructed not to deal with Euro exchange as of open of business in 
		Greece on Monday 25th march. 
		 
		
		All Greek markets will close for one day ‘at 
		least’.
	
	
	I have no particular faith in this scenario, but 
	offer it as an example of the turmoil to come.
	There will be a new currency and there will be winners and losers as a 
	result. 
	
	 
	
	Initially, these will be determined by political decisions, not 
	markets. 
	
		
	
	
	...may soon go through a similar process of re-instituting their own sovereign currencies.
 
	
	 
	
	 
	
	
	The United States May 
	Engineer A “Soft Default”
	
	The United States is in a similar condition to the European nations may 
	choose to have a similar currency event. 
	
	 
	
	Both Europe and the US have gotten to their 
	desperate states as a result of social welfare by stems that have run out of 
	control. In the US politicians have borrowed and used the printing press to 
	spend more than government collects and to buy votes with promises that 
	cannot be kept. 
	
	 
	
	As a result, the US is insolvent just as Europe.
	
	 
	
	
	
	 
	
	The US government is in somewhat better shape than its European counterparts 
	for two reasons:
	
		
			- 
			
			It controls the world’s currency, the 
			dollar.  
			  
			So long as this lasts (and it lasts only until an 
			alternative is found), it has more wiggle room in terms of its 
			extend and pretend options. The dollar will likely be a short-term 
			beneficiary of the disruptions in the Euro as capital flees out of 
			Europe into whatever is considered a safer haven.    
			Ultimately, the 
			dollar will weaken when it becomes apparent that the political class 
			in Washington is jeopardizing the dollar and US solvency. The US 
			political class has no way of solving the country’s problems. 
			   
			They 
			have chosen to sacrifice the dollar in order to extend their time in 
			power.
 
 
- 
			
			Its fiscal condition is not quite as bad 
			(yet!). At current government spending rates, that differential is 
			disappearing rapidly. 
	
	Washington has demonstrated it will “print 
	money” in whatever quantities necessary to stave off a sovereign bankruptcy 
	and a Great Depression. 
	
	 
	
	This strategy cannot work forever because 
	existing debt is already too high to be serviced. 
	
	 
	
	It is only a matter of 
	time before the US economy succumbs. Easy money will not produce an economic 
	recovery, nor will it avoid another Great Depression. It is a last gasp 
	strategy to defer the inevitable rather than to face up to the problem(s).
	
	If this strategy is continued, the dollar will eventually decline toward 
	Voltaire’s definition of fiat currency’s intrinsic value - zero. Before 
	that, I suspect the government will engineer a “soft default.” A soft 
	default is one where obligations are honored in nominal terms, but not in 
	real terms. It is easily done via high inflation.
	
	I speculated elsewhere about 
	
	the issuance of a new dollar as a means to 
	achieve such an outcome. It is simple, quick and devastating. In such a 
	scenario, the US changes currency much like Greece. 
	
	 
	
	Here is how such a 
	scenario could play out. 
	
	 
	
	The US declares the old dollar null and void, 
	requiring all old dollars to be converted into “new dollars.” This conversion is more dangerous to US citizens 
	than it would be for Greek citizens for two reasons:
	
		
			- 
			
			All contracts and obligations in the US 
			are denominated in dollars. The government could easily mandate that 
			all existing claims can be honored by payment in full with “new 
			dollars?”   
- 
			
			There is no competing currency in 
			circulation in the US. Citizens would not be able to arbitrage 
			against a competing currency. 
	
	Let’s look at an example of one way this could 
	happen. 
	
	 
	
	Government issues new dollars at the rate of 3 
	new for 1 old dollar. That is an immediate and massive devaluation of the 
	dollar. In effect, all creditors would be harmed by being paid off with 
	dollars now worth 33% of what was originally lent. Borrowers would benefit 
	to the degree that creditors lost. 
	
	 
	
	Real debt would effectively be reduced by 67%.
	
	
		
			- 
			
			Who would be the biggest beneficiary of 
			such a ruling? Why the US government! Further, all government 
			promises like social security, welfare payments, medicare, etc. 
			might also be deprecated.    
- 
			
			Who wins again? The US government!
			 
	
	Is there a pattern here?
	
	Those harmed most would be lenders. In this case, it would be anyone holding 
	US Treasuries like US citizens, China, Japan, etc. It would also be the US 
	banking system which could not survive without massive additional government 
	bailouts but government has already shown its propensity to do whatever is 
	necessary to keep the financial system alive.
	
	Apparent beneficiaries would be consumers and the housing markets. Real 
	consumer debt and mortgages would be effectively reduced by 67% (as incomes 
	would presumably triple). Of course they would be harmed by the bailouts 
	necessary to make the banks whole, but many would not even see the 
	connection.
	
	If such a devaluation played out as described, the government would 
	effectively “default” on two-thirds of its debt obligations while almost 
	assuredly maintaining that it was honoring them. Government would lose 
	credibility and be accused of bad faith by credit markets, but time would 
	eventually heal those concerns. 
	
	 
	
	Voila! Debt problem solved, but not the 
	economic problem.
	
	Inflation would at least triple, presumably raising many incomes and prices 
	accordingly. But price inflation is never uniform, so additional distortions 
	and inequities would be infused into the economy. 
	
	 
	
	The strategy would not avoid a Great Depression. 
	It might in fact bring one on sooner as the loss of purchasing power to the 
	elderly (anyone dependent on fixed incomes), the poor and those on 
	government assistance ripples through the economy. Further, such a strategy 
	could trigger hyperinflation which would reduce markets to barter, 
	essentially guaranteeing another Great Depression.
	
	A massive wealth transfer would have been effected away from the productive 
	sector toward the unproductive (government) sector.
	
	The scenario just described might be considered unlikely, but it is exactly 
	the strategy government has pursued since the economic crisis. Actually it 
	is a strategy followed even before 
	the current crisis. 
	
		
			- 
			
			Since 1980 inflation 
	has stolen 80% of the dollar’s purchasing power.  
- 
			
			Since the formation of 
			
			the 
	Federal Reserve in 1913, 96% has disappeared.  
- 
			
			Since 1980, the Fed has effectively given you 
	new dollars for old dollars (at least in purchasing power value) at a ratio 
	of 4 new for 1 old.  
	
	So how far-fetched would it be for them to declare an 
	emergency and repeat this action only in a shorter timeframe?
	
	It is difficult to be specific regarding a currency default/issuance of new 
	money in the US. The possibilities are there, easily accomplished and done 
	before, just in slower motion. 
	
	 
	
	Two areas may provide signals that something is 
	about to occur:
	
	 
	
		
			- 
			
			Markets 
			Markets often force action 
			before it is politically desirable. Erratic movements, especially in 
			exchange rates, might signal the imminence of such action. 
			   
			A rapidly 
			rising price 
			of gold would also likely precede such a currency event 
			as the ruling class and their crony friends dump the dollar in 
			advance and buy gold and other hard assets. 
			
 
 
- 
			
			Politics 
			The political class will do 
			what is in their interests and what they believe they can get away 
			with. As sovereign bankruptcy nears, the courage to default via a 
			currency event increases.    
			What was considered politically impossible 
			then becomes merely unpalatable. Further, as the country devolves 
			further towards totalitarianism and away from the Rule of Law, those 
			in charge will be more emboldened to act.    
			The 
			re-election of
			Obama 
			would seem to continue this harmful trend. 
	
	The world is headed for a debacle in financial 
	markets and living standards. 
	
	 
	
	Both will be preceded by currency collapses. The 
	declines in Europe and here will trigger conditions unlike anything before 
	experienced on a worldwide basis. Greece is merely a small canary in a small 
	coal mine. 
	
	 
	
	Pay attention to how this canary dies, because it may help you 
	survive what is coming to your personal coal mine.
	
	Much of the above is speculation, although I think it should be considered 
	as possible. When government is wounded, trapped and desperate, it lashes 
	out like a wild animal. Survival in the political class is just as strong a 
	drive as it is in the wilderness. I don’t know how government will lash out, 
	but you are likely to 
	see laws, restrictions and behavior you never 
	imagined.
	
	For me holding dollars and dollar-denominated assets is dangerous. 
	
	 
	
	Good luck and hunker down for some unbelievable 
	times ahead.