by Larry Chin
December 27, 2014
Almost all wars begin with false flag operations.
The coming conflicts in North Korea and Russia are no exception.
Mass public hysteria is being manufactured to justify aggression
against Moscow and Pyongyang, in retaliation for acts attributed to
the North Korean and Russian governments, but orchestrated and
carried out by the CIA and the Pentagon.
flagging of North Korea - CIA weaponizes Hollywood
The campaign of aggression against North Korea, from the hacking of
Sony and the crescendo of noise over the film,
The Interview, bears all the
markings of a CIA false flag operation.
The hacking and alleged threats to moviegoers has been blamed
entirely on North Korea, without a shred of credible evidence beyond
unsubstantiated accusations by the FBI. Pyongyang's responsibility
has not been proven. But it has already been officially endorsed,
and publicly embraced as fact.
The idea of "America under attack by North Korea" is a lie.
The actual individuals of the mysterious group responsible for the
hacking remain conveniently unidentified. A multitude of
possibilities - Sony insiders, hackers-for-hire, generic Internet
vandalism - have not been explored in earnest.
The more plausible involvement of US
spying agencies - the
etc. , their overwhelming technological capability and their
peerless hacking and surveillance powers - remains studiously
It is illogical for Pyongyang to have
done it. Isolated, impoverished North Korea, which has wanted
improved relations with the United States for years (to no avail),
gains nothing by cyberattacking the United States with its
relatively weak capabilities, and face the certainty of overwhelming
cyber and military response.
On the other hand, Washington benefits
greatly from any action that leads to regime change in North Korea.
But discussion about Pyongyang's involvement - or lack of - risks
missing the larger point.
This project, from the creation of The Interview to the
well-orchestrated international incident, has been guided by the
CIA, the Pentagon, and the State Department from the start. It is
propaganda. It is a weapon of psychological warfare. It is an
especially perverted example of military-intelligence manipulation
of popular culture for the purpose of war.
There is nothing funny about any of it.
The Interview was made with the
direct and open involvement of CIA and
Rand Corporation operatives for the
express purpose of destabilizing North Korea.
Star and co-director Seth Rogen
has admitted that he worked,
"directly with people who work in
the government as consultants, who I'm convinced are in the
Originally conceived to be a plot taking
place in an "unnamed country", Sony Pictures co-chairman Michael
Lynton, who also sits on the board of the Rand Corporation,
encouraged the film makers to make the movie overtly about murdering
Bruce Bennett, the Rand
Corporation's North Korean specialist, also had an active role,
expressing enthusiasm that the film would assist regime change and
spark South Korean action against Pyongyang.
Other government figures from the State
Department, even operatives connected to
read the script.
The infantile, imbecilic, tasteless, reckless idiots involved with
The Interview, including the tasteless Rogen and co-director Evan
Goldberg, worked with these military-intelligence thugs for
months. "Hung out" with them.
They do not seem to have had any problem
being the political whores for these Langley death merchants. In
fact, they had fun doing it. They seem not to give a damn, or even
half a damn, that the CIA and the Pentagon have used them, and
co-opted the film for an agenda far bigger than the stupid movie
All they seem to care about was that
they are getting publicity, and more publicity, and got to make a
stupid movie. Idiots.
The CIA has now succeeded in setting off a wave of anti-North Korea
war hysteria across America.
Witness the ignorant squeals and cries
from ignorant Americans about how,
"we can't let North Korea blackmail
us", "we can't let Kim take away our free speech".
Listen to the ridiculous debate over
whether Sony has the "courage" to release the film to "stand up to
the evil North Koreans" who would "blackmail America" and "violate
the rights" of idiot filmgoers, who now see it as a "patriotic duty"
to see the film.
These mental midgets - their worldviews shaped by the CIA culture
ministry with its endorsed pro-war entertainment, violent video
games, and gung-ho shoot ‘em ups - are hopelessly brain-curdled,
irretrievably lost. Nihilistic and soulless, as well as stupid, most
Americans have no problem seeing Kim Jong-Un killed, on screen or in
This slice of ugly America is the CIA's
finest post-9/11 army: violent, hate-filled, easily manipulated,
eager to obey sheeple who march to whatever drumbeat they set.
And then there are the truly dumb, fools who are oblivious to most
of reality, who would say "hey lighten up, it's only a comedy" and
"it's only a movie". Naïve, entitled, exceptionalist Americans think
the business of the war - the murderous agenda they and their movie
are helping the CIA carry out - is all just a game.
The CIA's business is death, and that there are actual assassination
plans in the files of the CIA, targeting heads of state.
Kim Jong-Un is undoubtedly on a real
assassination list. This is no funny, either.
The real act
The provocative, hostile diplomatic stance of the Obama
administration speaks for itself. Washington wanted to spark an
It wants regime change in Pyongyang,
does not care what North Korea or China think, and does not fear
anything North Korea will do about it.
On the other hand, imagine if a film were about the assassination of
Benjamin Netanyahu and the toppling of the government in Tel
Aviv. Such a film, if it would ever be permitted even in script
form, would be stopped cold.
If it made it through censors that
"magically" never slowed down The Interview (and yes, there is
censorship in America, a lot of it)
would personally fly to Tel Aviv to
apologize. At the very least, Washington would issue statements
distancing themselves from the film and its content.
Not so in the case of The Interview. Because American elites
actually want the Kim family murdered.
Despite providing no proof of North Korean involvement, President
Barack Obama promised a "proportional response". Promptly, North
Korea's Internet was mysteriously shut down for a day.
Unless one is naïve to believe in this coincidence, all signs point
to US spy agencies (CIA, NSA, etc.) or hackers working on behalf of
Washington and Langley.
Given the likelihood that North Korea had nothing to do with either
the hacking of Sony, the initial pulling of the movie (a big part of
the publicity stunt, that was not surprisingly reversed) or the
"blackmailing" of moviegoers, the shutting down of North Korea's
Internet was therefore a unilateral, unprovoked act of war.
Washington has not officially taken
responsibility. For reasons of plausible denial, it never will.
Perhaps it was a dry run. A message. The US got to test how easily
it can take down North Korea's grid. As we witnessed, given
overwhelming technological advantage, it was very easy. And when a
war against Pyongyang begins in earnest, American forces will know
exactly what they will do.
The US is flexing its Asia-Pacific muscles, sending a message not
only to Pyongyang, but to China, a big future target.
Some of the other muscle-flexing in
recent months included the anti-Beijing protests in Hong Kong
(assisted by the CIA and the US State Department), ongoing
provocations in the South China Sea over disputed oil, and new
defense agreements that place new anti-missile systems and
missile-guided naval vessels to the region.
The bottom line is that America has once again been mobilized into
supporting a new war that could take place soon. The CIA and Sony
have successfully weaponized a stupid movie, making it into a cause
and a battle cry.
If and when bombs fall on North Korea, blood will be on the hands of
the makers of The Interview, every single executive who allowed it
to be made, and the hordes who paid to see it.
If America were a decent, sane society, The Interview would be
exposed, roundly denounced, boycotted and shunned. Instead it is
celebrated. The CIA should be condemned. Instead, Seth Rogen hangs
out with them.
dysfunctional, loves them. Obeys them.
flagging of Russia
Regarding The Interview, Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman
Alexander Lukashevich issued a statement in sympathy with North
Korea, correctly calling the film's concept aggressive and
scandalous, and decried the US retaliatory response as
counterproductive and dangerous to international relations.
Of course. Washington has no interest in improved international
relations. The Russians should know. Like Kim Jong-Un,
has been vilified,
demonized and false-flagged, incessantly. If Kim is today's
object of ridicule, Putin is Evil Incarnate.
Consider the hysterical, desperate provocations by Washington in
A US-NATO coup, engineered by the CIA, toppled the government of
Ukraine, planting a pro-US neo-Nazi criminal apparatus on Russia's
doorstep. The CIA and its worldwide network of propagandists pinned
the blame on Putin and Russia for aggression, and for obstructing
MH-17 jetliner is downed by Ukrainian
operatives, with the support of the CIA, Mi-6, etc. etc.
This false flag operation was blamed on Russia - "Putin's
Missile". The US and NATO are still trying to pin these murders on
The war against the Islamic State - a massive CIA false flag
operation - seeks to topple with the
the Assad government as well as to militarily counter
The ongoing Anglo-American conquest of
regional oil and gas supplies, and energy transport routes is also
aimed at checkmating Russia and China across the region.
The US and NATO have attacked
the Russian federation with sanctions.
The US and Saudi Arabia have
collapsed oil prices, to further destroy the Russian
Full-scale military escalations
are being planned.
The US Congress is pushing new
legislation tantamount to an open declaration of war against
Perhaps it is time for the CIA to
produce a Seth Rogen-James Franco movie about assassinating Putin.
Another "parody". Or how about a movie about killing Assad, or
anyone else the United States wants to make into a Public Enemy?
Don't think Langley isn't working on it.
The return of
the Bushes (who were never gone)
In the midst of all escalating war hysteria comes news that Jeb Bush
is "actively exploring" running for president in 2016. The long
predicted return of the Bush family, the kings of terrorism, the
emperors of the false flag operation, back to the White House
The CIA will have its favorite family back in the Oval Office, with
true CIA scion to manage the apocalyptic wars are likely to be
launched in earnest in the next two years:
the Middle East
Jeb Bush will
"finish the job"
The 2016 presidential "contest" will be a charade. It is likely to
put forth two corrupt establishment political "friends" posing as
adversaries, when in fact, they are longtime comrades and
The fact is that the Clintons and
Bushes, and their intertwined networks, have run the country since
the 1980s, their respective camps taking turns in power, with
Obama as transitional figurehead (his administration has
always been run by neoliberal elites connected to the Clintonistas,
including Hillary Clinton herself).
The collective history of the Bushes stretches back to the very
founding of the American intelligence state. It is the very history
of modern war criminality. The resume is
George H. W. Bush
- the CIA operative and CIA
Director - is long and bloody, and littered with cocaine dust.
The entire Bush family ran the
drug apparatus, with the Clintons
among the Bush network's full partners in the massive
drug/weapons/banking frauds of that era, the effects of which still
And we need not remind that
the Bush clan and 9/11 are
responsible for the world of terror and false flag foreign policy
and deception that we suffer today.
While it remains too early to know which way the Establishment will
go with their selection (and it depends on how world war shakes out
between now and 2016), it is highly likely that Jeb
Bush would be
Hillary Clinton has already been scandalized - "Benghazi-ed".
Jeb Bush, on the other hand, has ideal
Establishment/CIA pedigree. He has waited years for the stupid
American public to forget the horrors that his family -
Georges H.W. and W.
- brought humanity. And now Americans , with their ultra-short
memories, have indeed forgotten, if they had ever understood it in
the first place.
And the American public does not know who Jeb Bush is, beyond the
Jeb Bush, whom Barbara Bush always said
was the "smart one", has been involved in Bush narco-criminal
business since Iran-Contra. His criminal activities in Florida, his
connection with anti-Castro Cuban terrorists and other connections
are there, for those who bother to investigate them.
His Latin American connections -
including his ability to speak fluent Spanish, a Latin wife and a
half-Latin son (George P. Bush, the next up and coming political
Bush) - conveniently appeals to the fastest-growing demographic, as
well as those in the southern hemisphere drug trade.
Recent Obama overtures towards the
Latino demographic - immigration, Cuba - appear to be a Democratic
Party move to counter Jeb Bush's known strengths in the same
Today, in the collective American mind,
A Jeb Bush presidency will be a pure war
presidency, one that promises terror, more unspeakable than we are
experiencing now, lording it over a world engulfed in holocaust.
This is not a movie.