'The chances of George W. Bush ever saying in public,
I express more sorrow, regret and apology than you can ever believe,
as Blair did on Wednesday, are virtually non-existent.'
Photograph: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters
the principal architect of this catastrophic war.
The U.S. should investigate George W. Bush
for his decision to invade
As the UK parliament released its long-awaited Chilcot Report on the country's role in the Iraq war on Wednesday, there have been renewed calls all over Britain to try former prime minister Tony Blair for war crimes.
This brings up another question:
The former U.S. president most responsible for the foreign policy catastrophe has led a peaceful existence since he left office.
Not only has he avoided any post-administration inquiries into his conduct, he has inexplicably seen his approval ratings rise (despite the carnage left in his wake only getting worse).
He is an in-demand fundraiser for Republicans not named Donald Trump, and he gets paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to speak at corporate events.
The chances of him ever saying in public,
The only thing close to the Chilcot report in the U.S. was the Senate intelligence committee's long-delayed investigation on intelligence failures in the lead-up to Iraq, released in 2008.
The Democratic-led committee faulted the CIA for massive intelligence failures and the Bush administration for purposefully manipulating intelligence for public consumption.
It led to a couple days of headlines, denunciations from the Bush White House (still in office at the time) and that was it...
After that, the Senate intelligence committee continued to lavish the CIA with praise, increase its budgets and provide only a modicum of oversight, despite the many scandals that preceded and succeeded the report.
When the same intelligence committee later investigated illegal CIA torture - also directed by the highest levels of the Bush administration - they didn't even bother mentioning the top officials who designed and sanctioned the program, only the anonymous (read: redacted) underlings who carried it out.
Bush himself suffered no consequences and, by that time, was claiming that the "Iraq surge had worked", a misleading drumbeat meant to obscure his calamitous original decision.
Barack Obama took prosecuting Bush officials for anything related its "war on terror" off the table before his administration ever took office, and his administration's stance on torture turned a blatant war crime into a policy dispute.
And that was that.
House Republicans' investigations into Benghazi has lasted far longer than any sort of investigation into Iraq, despite there being little doubt that the Iraq war was the biggest foreign policy disaster of the last quarter century.
Not only did it lead to the deaths of well over a million people, but the U.S. has spent trillions of dollars fighting it, and its chaotic ripple effects throughout the Middle East continue to dominate U.S. foreign policy.
Most notably, the war spawned the terrorist group Isis, which the U.S. will likely spend the next generation fighting.
Coincidentally, a scathing 'new' biography of Bush was published Tuesday by renowned historian Jean Edward Smith, and it sounds like it's closer to an indictment than anything an official governing body has come close to producing.
Smith, who devotes a substantial portion of his book to the lead-up and aftermath of the Iraq war, concludes:
Beyond Bush, the political elite in the U.S. has faced almost no punishment for supporting the invasion of Iraq.
Dick Cheney and company are also living comfortably in retirement, and both political parties have nominated people who supported the invasion in 2003.
It's unlikely that anything will ever actually happen to Tony Blair or any of the other war architects in the UK despite the report's damning conclusions.
And he'll continue to spend much of his time doing PR work for some of the world's worst dictators, helping them avoid the same fate that he will almost certainly miss himself...