by Leonard G. Horowitz and Sherri Kane

December 07, 2010

from BBSRadio Website


A plot to cause Bank of America to fail has been hatched involving WikiLeaks and its CEO, alleged "activist," suspected CIA operative, Julian Assange.

This article presents related evidence and commentary in advance of a threatened run on Bank of America by depositors frightened by what appears to be an organized conspiracy to crash the US economy.

Many years ago, the wizards behind Wall Street invested in the emerging New World Order, and set you up, along with the economy and everyone else, to go down.

The Rockefellers, Bushes, and Rothschild League of Bankers, manipulated governments, economies, BigPharma, the energy industries, terrorist groups, weapons makers, and media manipulators.


Their successes hinged on controlling every side of every major debate, political faction, and economic opportunity. Their ultimate success depends on controlling you too.

To institute their New World Order reforms they need your help. To enlist you in their fraud, they perfected frightening propaganda for marketing socio-economic deceptions, mass mind control, and building vast new industries, such as "Transportation Safety" following 9/11.

We The People, with money in banks, are now being pushed to consider the security or our investments.


There are rumors of banks closing soon, including Bank of America (BoA), the largest in our nation. If, or when, BoA fails, the "domino effect" assures a New Deal globally for the Rockefeller/Rothschild-directed banking industry.


Recalling History Now Repeating

Before you attack the nearest ATM, consider this economic fright is reminiscent of the 2009 Swine Flu fraud and marketing campaign.



Frightened by the intense propaganda, people waited in long lines for hours to get the deadly jab, believing it would keep them safe.


The "pandemic" fizzled and its devil-doers retreated once the light of truth was spread by word-of-mouth, and people like you, using the Internet. The New World Order agenda is set to bring everyone to plead for geopolitical and economic reforms administered by the next "trustworthy" reformer promoted by the networks.

When the entire economic system collapses, as it did during the Great Depression in 1929, Congress will undoubtedly put Rockefeller/Rothschild underlings, like Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs, on the witness stand to spew more rhetoric justifying their existence and New World Order economics.


Looking back at the Great Depression, the globalists needed to create a series of unprecedented financial disasters, beginning with the stock market crash and subsequent runs on banks.

Today, the "Big Crash" has happened, many banks have closed, and the final step, a global bank run, is scheduled for Tuesday, December 7th, 2010, according to news sources.

The threatening bank run campaign seems to have originated in France (see English website translation here).


Americans supposedly joined forces with the French (a rare occurrence neglecting traditionally strained relations), as you can see on and



The story starts with ex-Manchester football player, Eric Cantona, who allegedly came up with the idea that the way to strike back at "The System," was for everyone to remove their money from big banks on December 7th.

The question is what are the future consequences of doing that?

For the answer, recall 1929.

The problems rest with the globalists' license to consolidate, annihilate competition, and print as much money as they need to advance their New World Order. At the end of every Monopoly Game there is only one winner that owns everything.

So far the Rockefeller/Rothschild League has done a great job manufacturing and leveraging the worlds' disasters.



In a July, 2010, article written by these authors, you can see how the Central Bankers made vast fortunes on Hitler's birthday from their Gulf Oil Disaster, through their entities BP, Halliburton, and Transocean.

Shorting Transocean stocks 24-hours ahead of the explosion evidences foreknowledge and an organized conspiracy to commit environmental catastrophe, indicting these parties, and proving they are capable of committing unfathomable damage.


A Different View of The WikiLeaks Case


Is It Credible?
WikiLeaks is referred to as a "whistleblower site." It is best known for its release of Iraqi War documents including the names of confidential informants who worked with American and Iraqi security forces.

The site might serve, however, as a perfect platform for a CIA/MI6 counterintelligence program (i.e., COINTELPRO). Suspiciously, the operation, in this latest breaking news, appears to advance the NWO agenda.



WikiLeaks works perfectly for the NWO agenda because it allows the right amount of information and disinformation to slowly disseminate, manipulate, and confuse the minds of the masses.


After reading Wikileaks, stories about corruption in the financial sector of government as shown in these WikiLeak data logs, readers clamor for the some alternative to federal corruption. This feeds the New World Order agenda.

Thus, WikiLeaks appears to share more than its Wiki-branding with Wikipedia.


In recent months Wikipedia has been similarly exposed for 'corrupting' our minds on behalf of agent provocateurs working for the CIA and the Illuminati.



Julian Assange - Is He and Forbes Credible?
The latest news coming from WikiLeaks involves its CEO, Julian Assange, and Forbes magazine that lends Assange credibility. He states in his interview with Forbes that WikiLeaks will soon release tens of thousands of documents from a major U.S. financial firm in early 2011.


Assange wouldn't say exactly what date, what bank, or what documents, but he compared the coming release to the emails that emerged in the Enron trial, that provided a comprehensive look at a corporation's crimes.

"It will give a true and representative insight into how banks behave at the executive level in a way that will stimulate investigations and reforms, I presume," he told Forbes.


Forbes, you may recall from previous Horowitz and Kane articles, employed David Rockefeller's ally, Benjamin Fulford.


This Canadian propagandist, working in Japan, forged the last writing of Rockefeller nemesis, Christopher Story (a.k.a., Edward Harle). Fulford threatened journalist Story's death according to Story, the world's leading financial industry whistleblower. Story was murdered last July.


Then Fulford, collaborating with CIA agent-provocateur, Greg Szmansky (a.k.a., Eric Samuelson), attached a forged "Knights of Malta" list to Story's last article, libeling Dr. Horowitz in the process, and implicating him in Story's murder.

In the Forbes interview, Assange was asked,

"So do you have very high impact corporate stuff to release then?"

Assange replied,

"Yes, but maybe not as high impact, I mean, it could take down a bank or two."

There is talk that Bank of America, whose stock dropped more than 3% last week, may be one of the financial institutions that WikiLeaks is referencing, because in an October, 2009, interview with Computer World, Assange said,

"At the moment, for example, we are sitting on five gigabytes from Bank of America, one of the executive's hard drives," he said.


"Now how do we present that? It's a difficult problem. We could just dump it all into one giant Zip file, but we know for a fact that has limited impact. To have impact, it needs to be easy for people to dive in and search it and get something out of it."


Assange the Fugitive or Instrument of the Hegelian Dialectic?
Assange, we are told, is currently a fugitive, wanted by Interpol, allegedly for two sex crimes against women. In one case, he was reluctant to wear a condom during consensual sex.



The "fugitive" label now given to Assange works best for the Hegelian dialectic - the main method of mind-manipulation - challenging newsmakers' and whistleblowers' credibility, generating mass confusion.

This Hegelian, "mix-it-all-up," strategy evidences a CIA-COINTELPRO double agency: Assange, supposedly working for the good guys, appears discredited, yet assigned to operate as controlled opposition, a news maker that takes the heat of condemnation, a general distraction, only to be cleared later of wrongdoing in weakly evidenced cases.

Assange describes himself as an "information activist."


He says,

"The fundamental human struggle is between individuals and powerful institutions."

Increasingly, legitimate activists think Assange is "controlled opposition" - a shill for the "powerful institutions" he indicts. The bad guys have names that Assange neglects to mention.

Surely the gravity of America's economic collapse is sufficient to warrant Forbes's and Assange's full disclosure. Failure to do so is treasonous and genocidal given millions of lives are risked by their censorship and conducting their "business a usual."

Many people now see Assange as a "wolf in sheep's clothing."


Thierry Meyssan, who made himself an enemy of the U.S. by declaring in his book that 9/11 was orchestrated by George Bush, is one of many activists that may have once supported Assange.


His mind, along with many others, changed when Assange disparaged the 9/11 Truth Movement.



Assange reported,

"I am constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud."

Real conspiracies for war? What the heck was 9/11?


Follow the money from the Partnership for New York City's profits and losses from 9/11 to Las Vegas' latest attraction called the "City Center." There's your "smoking gun."


The equity investors' in "City Center" feature the 9/11 Memorial - two leaning Veer Towers - sufficient to indict Assange, Larry Silverstein, David Rockefeller, Rupert Murdoch, and Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs, for treason and mass murder.

Let's pin the tale on the right donkey. Meyssan has denounced Assange as being part of the American government "political diversion."


But the first "diversion" is thinking the American government, not the Rockefeller and Rothschild League of Bankers, is the root cause of chaos benefiting the NWO.




Assange, Ellsberg and Rand Corporation Propaganda
Now here's a shocker - history is repeating from the pre-WikiLeaks era...

Assange is being promoted, and endorsed, by Daniel Ellsberg, who leaked The Pentagon Papers that, like Assange's leaks, neglected Rockefeller family and CIA involvements in the profitable Vietnam War.



Ellsberg was employed by the Rand Corporation, a major propaganda contractor for the military investment community, especially the Illuminati.

Today, Ellsberg and Assange are heavily involved in public persuasion and distraction, strongly suggesting Rand Corporation's involvements in engineering this publicity campaign that could bring down the banks.

In 1971, Ellsberg generated worldwide attention by releasing copies of the 7000-page top-secret Pentagon document on the Vietnam War.


He is a master in economics and developed the "decision theory," now known as the "Ellsberg Paradox," related to "game theory," used in war making decisions. With his intelligence background, and globalist connections, there is little doubt Ellsberg and Assange are hiding more than they're telling about their bosses' NWO plans.

Assange's squealing in the media, in harmony with Ellsberg, foreshadowing social unrest, martial law, and foreign and domestic military operations, is obviously self-incriminating in lieu of Ellsberg's connections and endorsements of Assange.



In counterintelligence operations, two agents are better than one, especially when mutual admiration among "controlled-opposition leaders" leads to mass persuasion and deadly profitable distractions.

Researchers will find the above links to Wikipedia's propaganda neglects Michael Aquino's mention.


The director of the "Church of Set," the new "Church of Satan," has directed the Pentagon's propaganda programs since the Vietnam War ended.



Assange has made Ellsberg, Aquino, and the Illuminati, proud.


In an Oct. 23, 2010, interview with the New York Times, Ellsberg said of Assange,

"I've been waiting 40 years for someone to disclose information on a scale that might really make a difference."

What if that difference infects, injects, sickens, and starves 300 million Americans, and billions more worldwide?