
	August 13, 2012
	
	from
	
	PressTV Website
	
	 
	
	 
	
	 
	
	
	
	
	 
	
	
	London that is widely known as a perfect example of surveillance society 
	with its 
	watchful CCTVs, is now a perfect example of 
	a police state after the massive Olympics militarization, a fact even 
	organizers implicitly acknowledge.
	
	Organizers decided earlier this year to dress the official mascot for the 
	2012 Olympics in London, where the security and surveillance cordon are 
	nicknamed the Ring of Steel, in a Metropolitan police outfit.
	
	The mascots, “Wenlock” and “Mandeville”, feature a huge single eye that is 
	actually a camera lens that organizers said can “record everything.”
	
	The dolls effectively create an explicit symbol of the pervasive 
	surveillance state and suggest an unwelcome addition to British social life 
	that is now subject to an even more intrusive surveillance system thanks to 
	the biggest and most expensive British security operation in decades for the 
	Olympics.
	
	The irony has been taken up by critics of the Games.
	
		
		“Water cannon and steel cordon sold 
		separately. Baton rounds may be unsuitable for small children. A more 
		perfect visual metaphor for 2012, I cannot imagine,” Games Monitor 
		mocked.
	
	
	One can only appreciate what the Olympic mascots 
	have been ironically symbolizing when a few figures on the military 
	deployment during the Olympics are taken into consideration.
	
	The British government deployed more than three times as many regular troops 
	as former US president 
	George W. Bush administration did in 2002 for the 
	Winter Olympics at Salt Lake City, which began only six months after 
	the 
	9/11 incidents and four months after the US invaded Afghanistan.
 
	
	
	
	 
	
	A total 41,000 troops, police officers, private 
	security staff, etc were deployed in London.
	
	There also comes a long list of equipment on the ground and in the air:
	
	
		
			- 
			
			a Navy aircraft carrier HMS Bulwark and 
			the force’s largest warship HMS Ocean will watch the city
			 
			- 
			
			Typhoon fighter jets
 
			- 
			
			Apache Helicopters
 
			- 
			
			eagle-eyed surveillance drones and E-3 
			Sentinel spy planes will swarm the skies
 
			- 
			
			radars and surface-to-air missiles will 
			scan the skies while an 18km, 5,000-volt electrified security 
			barrier partitions off the Olympic zone
 
		
	
	
	The police state was further intensified by a de 
	facto suspension of civil liberties.
	
	Public protests were banned - and remain so - during the Games in “exclusion 
	zones” near key locations and protesters face police with enhanced powers 
	including the right to use force to enter private properties, seize 
	political posters and prevent the display of any material that challenges 
	the image of London as a “clean city”, which advertising sponsors including 
	
	
	McDonald’s and
	
	Coca-Cola kept promoting.
	
	Security measures also included,
	
		
	
	
	And is that all set to be removed now that the 
	Games have ended?
	
	
	The answer is no as there are speculations that the government is using the 
	opportunity to impose limitations on the British social life that would be 
	otherwise impossible thanks to civil rights campaigners.
	
	The idea for the continuation of the draconian measures would be that 
	Britain faces threats from terrorists lurked inside its own cities and 
	increasingly bigger surveillance would be needed to predict and contain such 
	threats.
	
	Here, victims would be the ethnic minorities and in particular Muslims.
	
	The police did announce in May 2011 that 290 CCTV cameras formerly installed 
	in the Muslim areas of Birmingham will be back online for the Games and 
	there is no end visible to the extra surveillance.
	
	What is more is that Olympic hosts have been unwilling to shelve the 
	security measures taken up for the Games as the example of Greece’s 
	high-tech surveillance cameras showed back in 2004.
	
	After all, dissent is not desirable especially in the surveillance society 
	of Britain and police began preparing London for the Games by predicting 
	crimes early before the Games.
	
	Back in July, officers reportedly arrested several graffiti artists in 
	pre-emptive raids, which serves as a good example of the state intrusion 
	into legal private activities of individuals in the police state the 
	Olympics have helped intensify.
	
	After media reports of 30 arrests, police claimed they arrested only four 
	people for illegal wall paintings.
	
	However, one of the detainees Darren Cullen turned out to be a known 
	graffiti businessmen whose company Graffiti Kings has carried out graffiti 
	projects for big names including Microsoft, Olympic sponsor Adidas and even 
	for Team GB.
	
	In a separate incident in Cardiff in July, police faced human rights 
	campaigners’ call not to turn the city into a “police state” after a 
	WalesOnline journalist was stopped and searched outside their headquarters.
	
	The concerned journalist said he was “shaken up” by the police behavior and 
	their violation of their guidelines.
	
		
		“Working in the city centre, it feels like 
		this place is turning into a police state,” he added.
	
	
	That was echoed by anti-surveillance campaigners 
	Privacy International.
	
		
		“Olympics shouldn’t be an excuse to turn 
		Britain into a police state,” it said.