Jul 24, 2009
Reading the following may be
hazardous to your mental health. The material herein has caused
readers to experience Cognitive Dissonance (CD).
CD is the discomfort felt at
the discrepancy between what you already know or believe, and new
information or interpretation that contradicts a strongly held
It’s that queasy feeling that
rises in your gut and screams, I DON’T BELIEVE THAT!
Because, if you accepted the
new information, you would have to admit you been "had," or
"conned," in this case into shopping for stuff to trash the planet.
The benefit of the new information is that the world around you will finally
make sense. Hot, flat, and crowded Thomas L. Friedman will finally
know what planet
George W. Bush is on.
Bush lost the war on terrorism and the war in
Iraq, but is winning the war on the environment.
At this point, it is advantageous to consider the efforts of writer
Andrew Hitchcock, author of
The History of the House of Rothschild:
"The Rothschilds have been in control of the
world for a very long time, their tentacles reaching into many aspects
of our daily lives, and are the hidden hand behind all the social
cataclysms in history.”
The French and American Revolution, the Civil
War, World Wars, the Industrial Revolution, the Federal Reserve and our
Rothschild policies include “total ruthlessness”
and as Frederic Morton writes in the Preface to “The Rothschild’s,”
“For the last one hundred and fifty years,
the history of the House of Rothschild has been to an amazing degree the
backstage history of Western Europe... The overwhelming success of the
Rothschild’s lay in their willingness to do what had to be done.”
What follows is the history that has been
intentionally left out of our textbooks.
The historical research by Toqueville, Chartier
and Hitchcock if examined without prejudice supports a prima facie case that
the House of Rothschild orchestrated the French and American Revolutions to
create the middle class (consumers) for the purpose of trashing the planet.
Our last President Bush, connected to the House of Rothschild Global
Financial Empire, was deadly serious when, after rejecting the global
climate change targets of the July 2008 G8 summit, he said,
"Goodbye, from the (then) world's biggest
“Things do not happen. Things are made to happen.”
John F. Kennedy
In the early 20th century historians (such as
Charles Beard), looking for the social forces they thought controlled
history, emphasized industrialization and urbanization. These were forces
unleashed by the industrial revolution and the textile industry. 
By the mid 20th century, attention turned to the
broader concept of "modernization," which included industrialization,
urbanization, psychological changes and changes in values.
Eric Hobsbawm called "modernization”
"probably the most important event in human history.”
Consumerism Needs the
If you were living in the 18th century looking for humans to consume the
resources of the planet, where would you find them?
Answer: 95-97percent of the population of Feudal Society.
The “Third Estate”
had potential consumers but first they would need to be “enlightened” with a
philosophy and movement based on respect for the dignity of man, concern for
his welfare, and the creation of favorable conditions for a just social
Men began to think government was not something kings exercised by divine
right and then Maximilien Robespierre started the French Revolution. The
order was given to Robespierre in book form by Rothschild’s agent
Adam Weishaupt and his associate Xavier Zwack. 
At the beginning of the Revolution, Kings, Monarchs and the despots of our
history books held supreme power; by the time it ended, the human rights
movement replaced centuries of tyranny and oppression for the common man.
Is that possible?
Revisionists are still trying to explain why the despots of our history
books wouldn’t use the Guillotine to dispense with such a heretical
Roger Chartier writes in
The Cultural Origins of The French Revolution,
the popular notion that the Enlightenment caused the Revolution makes the
mistake of post hoc ergo propter hoc:
"after the fact, therefore because of the
Thus, Chartier and other historians claim it was
the French Revolution that made the Enlightenment.
The Declaration of the Rights of Man is often seen as the quintessential
Enlightenment document but the declaration called for a meritocratic social
order, not an egalitarian one. Equality was conspicuously absent.
The revisionists are consistent in dismissing the Marxist interpretation,
but without a 20th century perspective on environmental damage they have no
systemic theory explaining the events in late 18th century France.
Ecocide was a pivotal and necessary part of the
Rothschild plan for a
New World Order.
In the summer of 1789 when France rose up in revolt it wasn’t over
intellectual, social or political issues; it was food. The country was in
the midst of a famine caused by abnormal weather.
The common man was having trouble developing his natural talent and
potential because he was hungry.
"The French Revolution will only be the
darkness of night to those who see it in isolation; only the times which
preceded it will give the light to illuminate it.
The whole social edifice of Ancien
Regime France collapsed at a single blow, and the fact that this was
in the midst of one of the worst El Niño episodes of the millennium is
something that should be taken into account when examining this
de Tocqueville 1952, p. 249
September 11, 1814 should be examined as well.
The rise of humanism and the social injustices in the 18th century did not
create the revolutionary brew that saw the overthrow of the French monarchy.
The House of Rothschild and the weather changed the course of history.
When the French government on the verge of bankruptcy from the seven years
wars was unable to provide famine relief, public frustration erupted into
violent demonstrations and the French Revolution.
Of course most despots would call for an inquisition and blame the peasants
for the worst El Niño episode in history.
In 1795 when the people rebelled against a provision of the National
Convention, Napoleon simply fired “a whiff of grape shot” into the mob, and
the rebellion was over. 
Why did the House of Rothschild allow the revolution to succeed?
Answer: There were not enough consumers in the First and Second Estates in
18th century Feudal Society to weaken the planet.
The House of
Rothschild Global Financial Empire
The vast accumulation of wealth, financial and natural resources of the
House of Rothschild is legendary.
"And there was no news more precious than
the (predetermined) outcome at Waterloo..."
Considered the turning point in history,
exploiting the Battle of Waterloo gave the Rothschild family complete
financial control of Europe, and soon after, the world. England would set up
a new Bank of England, with Nathan Mayer Rothschild in control.
According to one source in the late 1800s, when the planet was still in
"it was estimated the House of Rothschild
controlled almost half the wealth of the world” 
That would be real wealth: raw materials,
commodities, copper, iron ore, petroleum, lead, copper, silver and gold.
How much are they worth today?
Almost half of the world's fiat wealth about $500 trillion of the fiat
currency (monopoly money) they created out of thin air to finance our
consumer society. 
And their real wealth, where is it now?
Used up, as in consumed, by the middle class so former members of the Third
Estate (serfs and slaves) could have houses, cars, RVs, TVs and DVDs - the
affordable things we take for granted which put the planet on the bridge to
One of the more absurd notions that found its way into the history books and
the writings of economic experts, is that somehow the International Bankers
(swindlers and scoundrels of history) were made wealthier accumulating the
monopoly money they printed.
The swindlers and scoundrels wealth, not yours or mine, was eventually “cut,
mined and hauled away,” so that Americans could have that cheap stuff that
is currently “trashing the planet”.
During the last 100 years those swindlers were able to distort the structure
of relative prices; generate misallocations of labor and capital throughout
the economy; rationalize new governmental interventions in the face of the
market "instability" manipulate the patterns of and the profits from
international trade which resulted in the Industrial Revolution, the Great
stagflation of the 1970’s, the
dot-com and the housing
market bubbles… which resulted in unprecedented prosperity for the middle
class… and $500 trillion of monopoly money for the House of Rothschild.
Did Woodrow Wilson “ruin his country” when he signed The Federal
Reserve Act of 1913 and made the middle class prosperous beyond precedent in
the most powerful nation in the world?
Yes, because prosperous beyond precedent was unprecedented environmental
damage for the planet.
Capitalism never made
sense unless the goal was ecocide
The ideal and the principle of the market economy of Capitalism was never
What is called capitalism is a distorted, twisted and deformed system of
increasingly limited market relationships as well as market processes
hampered and repressed by state controls and regulations. And overlaying
this entire system are the ideologies of 18th-century mercantilism,
19th-century socialism, and 20th-century welfare statism.
Professor Ebeling, the Ludwig von Mises professor of Economics at Hillsdale
College, understood something was wrong when he wrote:
“the perverse development and evolution of
historical capitalism, the institutions necessary for a truly
free-market economy have been either undermined or prevented from
But when he claimed,
“it is the principles and the meaning of a
free-market economy that must be rediscovered” in order to overcome the
burden of historical capitalism and save liberty.
He should have written principles must be
rediscovered in order to save the planet from ecocide.
It didn’t matter if we listened to Keynes, Friedman or Mises; or for that
matter anyone from the Rothschild-funded Austrian School of Economics,
consumerism never made economic, environmental, or common sense. 
Even conscious consumers consume, as in use up the resources of the planet.
The American and French Revolutions made consumers out of 97% of the
population who could now afford, thanks to those scoundrels behind the
Federal Reserve, their own castle with all the furnishings and a two-car
garage for their mobile pollution devices - the personal automobile.
Let me repeat, since 1910 the
House of Rothschild and
the Rockefellers have
exchanged their real wealth for 600 trillion of
fiat currency (monopoly
money) they printed so former members of the Third Estate (serfs and slaves)
could have houses, cars, RVs, TVs and DVDs - the “stuff” which put the
planet on the bridge to Ecocide.
The only thing dumber is when a poor person in the People’s Republic of
China loans about $4,000 to everyone in the (rich) USA. 
Rockefeller philanthropy wasn’t limited to dimes.
 If “trashing the planet” was his
military objective, our last President Bush was not stupid, but a
brilliant commander-in-chief waging an all-out war on biodiversity,
animals and rainforests. He wanted to drill in the ANWR to trash
America’s last Arctic Wilderness. Sonar Testing is about torturing
whales and dolphins. And the Border Fence that keeps everything out but
illegal’s will disrupt an extraordinary source of biological diversity
along the 2,000-mile long region.
 By 1850 the United States following the
lead of England built their own industrial revolution around textiles.
There arose a great demand for the one crop that does more damage to the
environment than planting coffee or even tobacco… Cotton. Today, our
planet is in desperate trouble. Earth is suffocating as large tracts of
rain forests disappear. Pollution, poisons and chemicals are killing the
planet. These problems could have been avoided if the British textile
industry hadn’t “suddenly” discovered Cotton.
 The History of the House of Rothschild by Andrew Hitchcock, The
Establishment By Ted Lang, Rothschild Timeline - iamthewitness.com
 El Niño and mankind before the 20th century by ELinacre,
August 25, 1814, British troops captured the nation’s capital during the
War of 1812, setting fire to buildings in retaliation for American wins.
A tornado struck as the government buildings burned, killing 30 soldiers
and many local residents. One British historian noted, "More British
soldiers were killed and wounded by this stroke of nature than from all
the firearms the American troops had mustered in the ineffectual defense
of the city." The account in "Washington Weather" tells of a British
admiral who asked a local woman whether the storm was typical of the
weather "in this infernal country." The lady told him that it was a
storm specially sent by God "to drive our enemies from the city."
September 11, 1814 the decisive battle of the War of 1812.
"Washington Weather" at weatherbook.com/1814.htm,
Did a tornado wreak havoc on the War of 1812? By Kevin Myatt,
 The World Book Encyclopedia
 The Power Of The Rothschilds By Fritz Springmeier (Excerpt -
Bloodlines of the Illuminati, The History of the House of Rothschild by
 The Zionist Connection - An Unholy Tripartite by Ted Lang
 From the Congress of Vienna (September 1814 to June 1815) came the
phrases "Austrian School of Politics", and the "Austrian School of
Economics" presently epitomized by Milton Friedman, in which Rothschild
financial schemes are used to carry out Rothschild political goals. The
History of the House of Rothschild by Andrew Hitchcock
 The Automobile and the Environment in American History by Martin V.
 The $1.4 Trillion Question by James Fallows