by Jon Rappoport
December 26, 2016
Technocracy is the basic agenda and
plan for ruling global society from above, so we need to understand
it from several angles.
Consider a group of enthusiastic forward-looking engineers in the
early 20th century. They work for a company that
has a contract to manufacture a locomotive.
This is a highly complex piece of
On one level, workers are
required to make the components to spec. Then they must put
them all together. These tasks are formidable.
On another level, various
departments of the company must coordinate their efforts.
This is also viewed as a technological job. Organizing is
considered a technology.
When the locomotive is finished and
delivered, and when it runs on its tracks and pulls a train, a great
and inspiring victory is won.
And then… the engineers begin to think about the implications.
Suppose the locomotive was
Suppose society was the finished
Couldn't society be put together
in a coordinated fashion?
And couldn't the "technology of
organizing things" be utilized for the job?
Why bother with endlessly
arguing and lying politicians?
Why should they be in charge?
Isn't that an obvious losing
Of course it is...
But engineers could lay out and build a future society that would
benefit all people. Hunger, disease, and poverty could be wiped out.
Eliminating them would be part of the uncompromising blueprint.
This "insight" hit engineers and technicians like a ton of bricks.
Of course! All societies had been failures for the same reason:
the wrong people were in charge.
Armed with this new understanding,
engineers of every stripe began to see what was needed.
A revolution in thinking about societal
organization. Science was the new king. And science would rule.
Of course, for an engineered world to work, certain decisions would
have to be made about the role of the individual. Every individual.
You couldn't have an air-tight plan if every human were free to
pursue his own objectives. Too many variables. Too much confusion.
Too much conflict.
Well, that problem could be solved.
The individual's actions would be
tailored to fit the coordinated operations of the planned society.
The individual would be inserted into a pre-ordained slot. He would
be "one of the components of the locomotive." His life would be
connected to other lives to produce an exemplary shape.
Yes, this could imply a few problems, but those problems could be
They would have to be worked out,
because the overriding goal was the forming of a world
organization. What would you do if one bolt (an individual
human) in one wheel of a locomotive was the wrong size? You would go
back and correct the error. You would re-make the bolt.
Among sincere technocrats, the overall vision superseded the glaring
But… other people entered the game...
High-echelon Globalists saw technocracy
as a system they could use to control the population.
Control was their goal. Period...
What happened to the individual in the
process was of no concern to them. The individual had freedom or he
didn't have freedom, and the Globalists overtly intended to wipe out
Erasing hunger, poverty, illness? Nonsense. For the Globalists,
those realities would be exacerbated:
Sick, weak, and debilitated people
were easier to rule and control and manage.
Essentially, a vastly misguided vision
of a future technocratic utopia was hijacked. Something bad was made
In a nutshell, this is the history of technocracy...
A locomotive is a society? No. That was the first fatally flawed
idea. Everything that followed was increasingly psychotic.
Unfortunately, many people in our world believe
in Globalism, if you could call a
partial vague view a legitimate belief.
They dreamily float on all the
propaganda cover stories:
greatest good for the greatest
number of people
no more poverty
equality of sharing
reducing the carbon footprint
a green economy
engineering production and
consumption of goods and services for the betterment of
...and all of this delivered from a
central platform of altruistic guides.
If you track down the specifics that sit under these
pronouncements, you discover a warped system of planning that
delivers misery and de facto slavery to the global population.
The collective utopia turns out to be a sham.
Waking up is hard to do? Breaking up is hard to do?
They must be done. A workable
technological fix is a very nice achievement when the project is a
machine. But transferring that glow of victory to the whole of
society is an illusion.
Anything that calls itself education
would tackle the illusion as the first order of business...