No Easy Answers!
Pope John Paul II said,
"The common outcry, which is justly made on
behalf of human rights - for example, the right to health, to home,
to work, to family, to culture - is false and illusory if the right
to life, the most basic and fundamental right and the condition for
all other personal rights, is not defended with maximum
[Christifidelis laici. no. 38].
In 1974, Mankind At The Turning Point - The Second Report To The
Club Of Rome was published.
Written by Mihajlo Besarvic and
Pestel, it says, in part [quoting:]
Suddenly - virtually overnight when measured on a historical scale -
mankind finds itself confronted by a multitude of unprecedented
crises: the population crisis, the environmental crisis, the world
food crisis, the energy crisis, the raw material crisis, to name
just a few. New crises appear while the old ones linger on with the
effects spreading to every corner of the Earth until they appear in
point of fact as global, worldwide, crises.
Attempts at solving any
one of these in isolation has proven to be temporary and at the
expense of others; to ease the shortage of energy or raw materials
by measures which worsen the condition of the environment means,
actually, to solve nothing at all. Real solutions are apparently
interdependent; collectively, the whole multitude of crises appears
to constitute a single global crisis-syndrome of world development.
The intensity of the crisis in global world development and the
elusiveness of effective measures to bring about a solution
challenge premises that have long been most fundamental in guiding
the evolution of human society. Although these premises have paved
the way for human progress in the past, they have also, finally, led
to the present conditions.
Mankind, therefore, appears to be at a
turning point: to continue on the old road - that is, to follow the
traditional route, unchallenged, into the future - or to start on a
Jumping several paragraphs ahead,
"On certain growth issues there would seem to exist universal
agreement. Consider, for example, the issue of population growth.
Few would quarrel with the position that the global population
cannot and should not be permitted to grow unchecked forever. That
the population must level off some time, i.e., that population
growth should stop, is the view gaining universal acceptance."
Man’s dependency on Nature goes very deep indeed; his use and misuse
of resources is only part of the picture.
As man has become the
dominant force in the shaping of life-systems on the Earth, his
ascent has been accompanied by a reduction of the biological
diversity in Nature. Species not perceived to be in the service of
man have been systematically reduced in number or eliminated. Should
this trend continue, Earth will soon be inhabited by a diminished
number of species.
Today we understand much better than our
ancestors that the existence of all life on Earth - our own included
- depends on the stability of the ecological system. An Earth with
less diverse inhabitants might not continue to possess the stability
essential for adaptation and survival. And if our ecosystem breaks
down - even if only temporarily - the effect on mankind will be
The ultimate irony confronting technological man may
well reside in the fact that Nature’s most potent threats to human
welfare are not her destructive power - earthquakes, tornadoes and
hurricanes - but the fragility of the web of life, the delicacy of
those skeins which bind species to species and which comprise the
dynamic bonds which relate to animate and inanimate realms so
inextricably in the processes of life.
BRIEF ON MAN’S INTERFERENCE IN NATURE
Continuing with Mankind At A Turning Point, [quoting:]
Being "but a part of nature," man has always affected and has always
been affected by his environment. However, due to the
disproportionate increase in numbers and due to increased
sophistication in man’s intervention in natural processes, the
interference of man is taking on a completely new dimension with
unpredictable and potentially catastrophic consequences; this is
beginning to cause concern from an unsuspected source: the
scientists who originated and developed such techniques of
A good example is the most recent appeal by a group of
micro-biologists to the world scientific community at large to
refrain from conducting the experiments that involved inserting into
bacteria the genes which are resistant to antibiotics or the genes
of viruses. [Remember, this was written in 1974.] The potential
danger to which the appeal specifically addresses itself is due to
the fact that the bacteria often used in scientific experiments of
this kind is a common inhabitant in the human intestine.
of such a resistant bacteria escaping and infecting the population
must be taken into account; it implies the possibility of loosing
new plagues upon the world. The event was properly hailed by the
scientists themselves as a historical landmark of restraint to
conduct experiments purely for the sake of scientific curiosity. It
represents a reversal of the cherished tradition that nothing should
interfere with the sciences’ search for truth.
However, even if the
experiments in which new, resistant bacteria are created are
foolproof, there exists a real danger in:
the potential of using
such a new technique for biological warfare;
the possibility of
such experiments being conducted outside of a properly controlled
Although the use of this less-than-a-year-old technique
is still in the hands of experts, it will be a "high school project
within a few years."
The solemn high-level warnings against
conducting such experiments whose consequences cannot be predicted
could hardly be considered as a sufficient deterrent then. But there
are many others, even if considered less spectacular, examples of
unknown and potentially harmful consequences of man’s intervention
Continuing from Mankind At The Turning Point,
"The most precious of all resources is
food. Given even the most
optimistic projections for population growth during the next fifty
years, the worldwide demand for this resource will increase several
fold. But to grasp the seriousness of the food problem and to
comprehend the strain the demand for food will impose on the world
system, one does not have to look into the future at all: the
situation is already critical."
Further into the document,
Our computer analysis, pregnant with optimism, shows clearly that
the food crisis in South Asia will worsen. In spite of all the
advancements assumed, the availability of fertilizer and land
assumed, the lack of intervening disaster assumed, the protein
deficit will continuously increase; by the year 2025 it will be up
to 50 million tons annually. Such deficits could never be closed by
imports: to pay for that quantity of imports, South Asia would have
to spend one third of its total economic output, and three times
what it earns from exports.
But even if South Asia had that kind of
money, the physical problems of handling those quantities of food
would be incredible. In one year the region would then have to
import 500 million tons of grain - twice as much as the total
tonnage of all goods now being shipped overseas from the United
States. And that is assuming that that quantity of grain would be
grown for export elsewhere - 500 million tons, after all, is larger
than the total grain production of the entire Developed World.
Moreover, these quantities would have to be delivered every year, in
ever increasing amounts, without end. In sum, it would be
But what would happen if those imports were not available? That
question forms the basis of our second, or "tragic ", scenario. All
of our optimistic assumptions have remained, except that we assume
that importation of grain will be part of the picture. The
catastrophe would start in the early 1980s and peak around 2010:
deaths related to the food shortage would be double the normal death
Thereafter, the death rate will decline, but only because the
earlier deaths reduced the birth rate for a later generation. Or, to
put is more cruelly but simply, the people who would be having
babies died when they were babies. The number of food-related deaths
in the fifty-year period ending in 2025 would be, in the age of 0-15
group alone, about 500 million children.
In the November 1995 newsletter Forecast Highlights,
"Where is the wheat?
Answer: Some of the world’s wheat crop
in 1995 was damaged or destroyed by bad weather, diseases, or
insects. China needs wheat due to drought that lasted from October
1994 to present. The Soviets’ wheat crop shrank significantly due to
drought and insects. Australia’s wheat burned up in a severe
drought. Canada’s crop was damaged by drought and the Orange Blossom
Midge (an insect). Much of Europe’s crop drowned out last February
and the rest burned up in the drought 6 months later. Finally,
Argentina’s winter crop went 120 days with no water - which all but
ruined the 1995 crop.
"Who’s left that has any wheat?
Answer: the US. Even the US crop had
problems, and much of the Hard Red Winter wheat belt centered in
Kansas is quite dry as this is being written. Different varieties of
wheat had problems in 1995 and most saw some reduction in total
yields. The US is the only country that has sizable quantities of
wheat still available for sale. There is more demand for wheat
worldwide than the US has wheat to fill. An explosion is about to
happen in the trading pits and some vicious events may take place
before this is over. Keep in eye on China; they need lots of wheat
and they’ll have to get most of it from the US if they want it."
Returning to Mankind At The Turning Point,
"In summary, the only
feasible solution to the world food situation requires:
approach to the problem;
Investment aid rather than commodity
aid, except for food;
A balanced economic development for all
An effective population policy;
diversification of industry, leading to a truly global economic
"Only a proper combination of these measures can lead to a solution.
Omission of any one measure will surely lead to disaster. But the
strains on the global food production capacity would be lessened if
the eating habits in the affluent part of the world would change,
becoming less wasteful."
Mankind At The Turning Point concludes with the following
We most warmly welcome this report by
Mihajlo Mesarovic and Eduard
The Club of Rome. It marks an important new step toward
understanding the global natural and human systems within which we
live. And it appears as a book for wide distribution at an opportune
time. Under the impact of worsening world situations, public opinion
has greatly matured in the last few years.
in every country and the world establishment generally, although
forced to face up to the stark realities of our age, are still
reluctant to renovate their thinking and modes of action. The Mesarovic-Pestel work will confront them with a compelling frame of
references that can hardly be ignored, offering them at the same
time a new, potentially powerful tool to test out the validity or
futility of their views and their policies in the real world
Results to date, however, are already very important. The authors
have concentrated on several clusters of problems which, if not
squarely met, can, alone, provoke unimaginable disasters. Backed by
this intensive research and study, certain basic conclusions have
been reached. They confirm earlier warnings of The Club of Rome.
of them should be quoted here:
No fundamental redressment of the world conditions and human
prospects is possible except by worldwide cooperation in a global
context and with long views.
The costs, not only in economic and political terms, of the
world conditions and human prospects is possible except by worldwide
cooperation in a global context and with long views.
The costs, not only in economic and political terms, but in human
suffering as well, which will result from delay in taking early
decisions, are simply monstrous.
How can a true world community emerge, or even our present human
society survive when it is ridden by profound and intolerable
injustices, overpopulation and mega-famines, while it is crippled by
energy and materials shortages, and eaten up by inflation? What
explosions or breakdowns will occur, and where and when, now that
nuclear war technology and civil violence are outrunning the pace of
political wisdom and stability?
The odds seem against man. Yet we are moderately hopeful. The winds
of change have begun to blow. A keen and anxious awareness is
evolving to suggest that fundamental changes will have to take place
in the world order and its power structures, in the distribution of
wealth and income, in our own outlook and behavior. Perhaps only a
new and enlightened humanism can permit mankind to negotiate this
transition without irreparable lacerations.
In the UN, for example, new concepts such as that of "world
collective economic security" as a necessary correlative to
political security, and an innovative "charter of duties and rights"
of members states is under consideration. In April 1974, a special
session of the Assembly issued a declaration on the establishment of
a "new international economic order." And the
UN world conferences -
first on man and his environment, followed by studies on population,
food, and the law of the seas, with planned sessions on energy and
materials, human settlements, etc. - address themselves to global
problems and global solutions.
These are the ferments of an inevitable revolution in international
relations; they herald in a different management of the human
society. Last February in Salzburg The Club of Rome convened a
meeting of senior statesmen from different countries and cultures to
discuss global problems and long-term alternatives for human
society. The concluding statement interpreted the meeting as
unequivocally indicating that "a new spirit of active solidarity and
cooperation" among all peoples and nations - called the Spirit of
Salzburg - is indispensable for mankind to face the challenge of our
COMMITTEE OF 300
In Dr. John Coleman’s comprehensive work,
Conspirators Hierarchy -
The Story Of The Committee Of 300, he writes:
The Committee of 300 had already abrogated the decisions of life and
death unto itself, and Peccei knew it. He had previously so
indicated in his book Limits Of Growth. Peccei completely dismissed
industrial and agricultural progress and in its place demanded that
the world come under one coordinating council, to wit,
the Club of
Rome and its NATO institutions, in a One World Government.
Natural resources would have to be allocated under the auspices of
global planning. Nation states could either accept Club of Rome
domination or else survive by the law of the jungle and fight to
survive. In its first "test case," Meadows and Forrestor planned the
1973 Arab-Israeli War on behalf of the RIIA to sharply bring home to
the world that natural resources like petroleum would in the future
come under global planners’ control, meaning of course, under the
control of the Committee of 300.
Tavistock Institute called for a consultation with
Peccei to which
McGeorge Bundy, Homer Perlmutter and Dr. Alexander King were
invited. From London Peccei traveled to the White House where he met
with the President and his cabinet, followed by a visit to the State
Department where he conferred with the Secretary of State, the State
Department’s intelligence service and State’s Policy Planning
Council. Thus, from the very beginning, the United States government
was fully aware of the Committee of 300’s plans for this country.
That should answer the often asked question,
"Why would our
government allow the Club of Rome to operate in a subversive manner
in the United States?"
Volcker’s economic and monetary policies were a reflection of those
of Sir Geoffrey Howe, Chancellor of the Exchequer and member of the
Committee of 300. This serves to illustrate how Britain has
controlled the United States, beginning from soon after the War of
1812, and continues to exercise control over this country through
the policies of the Committee of 300.
What are the goals of the secret elite group, the inheritors of
Illuminism (Moriah Conquering Wind), the
Cult of Dionysius, the Cult
of Isis, Catharism, Bogomilism?
This elite group that also calls
itself the Olympians (they truly believe they are equal in power and
stature to the legendary gods of Olympus, who have, like Lucifer
their god, set themselves above our true God) absolutely believe
they have been charged with implementing the following by divine
A One World Government - New World Order with a unified church
and monetary system under their direction. Not many people are aware
that the One World Government began setting up its "church" in the
1920s/1930s, for they realized the need for a religious belief
inherent in mankind to have an outlet and, therefore, set up a
"church" body to channel that belief in the direction they desired.
The utter destruction of all national identity and national
The destruction of religion and more especially the Christian
religion, with the one exception, their own creation mentioned
Control of each and every person through means of mind control
and what Brzezinski calls "technotronics" which would create
human-like robots and a system of terror beside which Felix Dzerzinski’s
Red Terror will look like children at play.
An end to all industrialization and the production of nuclear
generated electric power in what they call "the post-industrial
zero-growth society". Exempted are the computer and service
industries. United States industries that remain will be exported to
countries such as Mexico where abundant slave labor is available.
Unemployables in the wake of industrial destruction will either
become opium-heroin and/or cocaine addicts, or become statistics in
the elimination process we know today as
Global 2000 Report.
Legalization of drugs and pornography.
Depopulation of large cities according to the trial run carried
out by the Pol Pot regime in Cambodia. It is interesting to note
that Pol Pot’s genocidal plans were drawn up here in the United
States by one of the Club of Rome’s research foundations. It is also
interesting that the Committee is presently seeking to reinstate the
Pol Pot butchers in Cambodia.
Suppression of all scientific development except for those
deemed beneficial by the Committee. Especially targeted is nuclear
energy for peaceful purposes. Particularly hated are the fusion
experiments presently being scorned and ridiculed by the Committee
and its jackals of the press. Development of the fusion torch would
blow the Committee’s conception of "limited natural resources" right
out of the window. A fusion torch properly used could create
unlimited untapped natural resources from the most ordinary
substances. Fusion torch uses are legion and would benefit mankind
in a manner which is as yet not even remotely comprehended by the
Cause by means of limited wars in the advanced countries, and by
means of starvation and diseases in Third World countries, the death
of 3 billion people by the year 2000, people they call "useless
eaters". The Committee of 300 commissioned Cyrus Vance to write a
paper on this subject of how best to bring about such genocide. The
paper was produced under the title the
Global 2000 Report
accepted and approved for action by President Carter, for and on
behalf of the U.S. Government, and accepted by Edwin Muskie, then
Secretary of State. Under the terms of the Global 2000 Report, the
population of the United States is to be reduced by 100 million by
the year 2050.
To weaken the moral fiber of the nation and to demoralize
workers in the labor class by creating mass unemployment. As jobs
dwindle due to the post industrial zero growth policies introduced
by the Club of Rome, demoralized and discouraged workers will resort
to alcohol and drugs. The youth of the land will be encouraged by
means of rock music and drugs to rebel against the status quo, thus
undermining and eventually destroying the family unit. In this
regard The Committee of 300 commissioned Tavistock Institute to
prepare a blueprint as to how this could be achieved. Tavistock
directed Stanford Research to undertake the work under the direction
of Professor Willis Harmon. This work later became known as
To keep people everywhere from deciding their own destinies by
means of one created crisis after another and then "managing" such
crises. This will confuse and demoralize the population to the
extent where faced with too many choices, apathy on a massive scale
will result. In the case of the United States, an agency for crisis
management is already in place. It is called the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA), whose existence I first disclosed in 1980.
There will be more on FEMA as we proceed.
To introduce new cults and continue to boost those already
functioning, which includes rock "music" gangsters such as the
filthy, degenerate Mick Jagger’s Rolling Stones (a gangster group
much favored by European Black Nobility) and all of the
"rock" groups which began with The Beatles.
To continue to build up the cult of Christian fundamentalism
begun by the British East India Company’s servant, Darby, which will
be misused to strengthen the Zionist state of Israel through
identifying with the Jews through the myth of "God’s Chosen People"
and by donating very substantial amounts of money to what they
mistakenly believe is a religious cause in the furtherance of
To press for the spread of religious cults such as the
Brotherhood, Moslem fundamentalism, the Sikhs, and to carry out
experiments of the Jim Jones and "Son of Sam"-type of murders. It is
worth noting that the late Ayatollah Khomeini was a creation of
British Intelligence, Military Intelligence Division 6, commonly
known as MI-6, as I reported in my 1985 work, What Really Happened
To export "religious liberation" ideas around the world so as
to undermine all existing religions but more especially the
Christian religion. This began with "Jesuit Liberation Theology"
which brought about the downfall of the Somoza family rule in
Nicaragua and which is today destroying El Salvador, now 25 years
into a "civil war", Costa Rica and Honduras. One very active entity
engaged in so-called liberation theology is the Communist-oriented
Mary Knoll Mission. This accounts for the extensive media attention
to the murder of four of Mary Knoll’s so-called nuns in El Salvador
a few years ago.
The four nuns were Communist subversive agents and their activities
were widely documented by the government of El Salvador. The United
States press and new media refused to give any space or coverage to
the mass of documentation in possession of the Salvadoran
government, documentation which proved what the Mary Knoll Mission
nuns were doing in the country. Mary Knoll is in service in many
countries, and played a leading role in bringing Communism to
Rhodesia, Mozambique, Angola and South Africa.
To cause a total collapse of the world’s economies and engender
total political chaos.
To take control of all foreign and domestic policies of the
To give the fullest support of supranational institutions such
as the United Nations (UN), the International Monetary Fund (IMF),
the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the
World Court and,
as far as possible, make local institutions of lesser effect by
gradually phasing them out or bringing them under the mantle of the
Penetrate and subvert all governments, and work from within
them to destroy the sovereign integrity of nations represented by
Organize a world-wide terrorist apparatus and negotiate with
terrorists whenever terrorist activities take place. It will be
recalled that it was Bettino Craxi who persuaded the Italian and
U.S. governments to negotiate with the Red Brigades kidnappers of
Prime Minister Moro and General Dozier. As an aside,
is under orders not to talk about what happened to him. Should he
break that silence, he will not doubt be made "a horrible example
of" in the manner in which Kissinger dealt with Aldo Moro,
Bhutto and General Zia ul Haq.
Take control of education in America with the intent and
purpose of utterly and completely destroying it.
Much of these goals, which I first enumerated in 1969, have since
been achieved or are well on their way to being achieved.
the Committee of 300 program is the core of their
economic policy, which is largely based on the teachings of Malthus,
the son of an English country parson who was pushed to prominence by
the British East India Company upon which the Committee of 300 is
Malthus maintained that man’s progress is tied to the Earth’s
natural ability to support a given number of people, beyond which
point Earth’s limited resources would rapidly be depleted.
Once these natural resources have been consumed, it will be impossible to
replace them. Hence, Malthus observed, it is necessary to limit
populations within the boundaries of decreasing natural resources.
It goes without saying that the elite will not allow themselves to
be threatened by a burgeoning population of "useless eaters," hence
culling must be practiced.
As I have previously stated, "culling" is
going on today, using the methods mandated in the Global 2000
Report. All economic plans of the Committee meet at the crossroads
of Malthus and Frederick Von Hayek, another doom and gloom economist
who is sponsored by
the Club of Rome.
The Austrian born
has long been under the control of
David Rockefeller, and Von Hayek
theories are fairly widely accepted in the United States.
to Von Hayek, the United States economic platform must be based on:
Urban Black Markets
Small Hong Kong-type industries
utilizing sweat-shop labor
The Tourist Trade
Enterprise Zones where speculators can operate unhindered and where
the drug trade can flourish
End of all industrial activity
Close down all nuclear energy plants
Von Hayek’s ideas dove-tail perfectly with those of
the Club of
Rome, which is perhaps why he is so well promoted in rightwing
circles in this country.
The mantle of Von Hayek is being passed to
a new, younger economist, Jeoffrey Sachs, who was sent to Poland to
take up where Von Hayek left off. It will be recalled that
of Rome organized the Polish economic crisis which led to political
destabilization of the country. The exact same economic planning, if
one dare call it that, will be forced upon Russia, but if widespread
opposition is encountered, the old price-support system will quickly
The Committee of 300 ordered the Club of Rome to use Polish
nationalism as a tool to destroy the Catholic Church and pave the
way for Russian troops to reoccupy the country. The "Solidarity"
movement was a creation of the Committee of 300’s
Brzezinski, who chose the name for the "trade union" and selected
its office holders and organizers. Solidarity is no "labor"
movement, although Gdansk shipyard workers were used to launch it,
but rather it was a high-profile political organization, created to
bring forced changes in preparation for the advent of the One World
Most of Solidarity’s leaders were descendants of Bolshevik Jews from
Odessa and were not noted for hating Communism. This helps to
understand the saturation coverage provided by the American news
Professor Sachs has taken the process a step further,
ensuring economic slavery for a Poland recently freed from the
domination of the USSR. Poland will now become the economic slave of
the United States. All that has happened is that the master has
Brzezinski is the author of a book that should have been read by
every American interested in the future of this country. Entitled
The Technotronic Era, it was commissioned by the Club of Rome.
book is an open announcement of the manner and methods to be used to
control the United States in the future. It also gave notice of cloning and "robotoids," i.e., people who acted like people and who
seemed to be people, but who were not. Brzezinski, speaking for the
Committee of 300 said the United States was moving "into an era
unlike any of its predecessors; we are moving toward a technotronic era that could easily become a dictatorship."
I reported fully on The Technotronic Era in 1981 and mentioned it in my newsletters a
number of times.
Brzezinski went on to say that our society "is now in an information
revolution based on amusement focus, spectator spectacles
(saturation coverage by television of sporting events) which provide
an opiate for an increasingly purposeless mass." Was Brzezinski
another seer and a prophet? Could he see into the future?
is NO; what he wrote in his book was simply copied from the Committee of 300’s blueprint given to the Club of Rome for
execution. Isn’t it true that by 1991 we already have a purposeless
mass of citizens? We could say that 30 million unemployed and 4
million homeless people are a "purposeless mass," or at least the
nucleus of one.
In addition to religion, "the opiate of the masses" which
Marx acknowledged was needed, we now have the opiates of mass
spectator sport, unbridled sexual lusts, rock music and a whole new
generation of drug addicts.
Mindless sex and an epidemic of drug
usage was created to distract people from what is happening all
around them. In The Technotronic Era Brzezinski talks about "the
masses" as if people are some inanimate object - which is possibly
how we are viewed by the Committee of 300. He continually refers to
the necessity of controlling us "masses".
At one point, he lets the cat out of the bag:
"At the same time the capacity to assert
social and political
control over the individual will vastly increase. It will soon be
possible to assert almost continuous control over every citizen and
to maintain up-to-date files, containing even the most personal
details about health and personal behavior of every citizen in
addition to the more customary data.
"These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the
authorities. Power will gravitate into the hands of those who
control information. Our existing institutions will be supplanted by
pre-crisis management institutions, the task of which will be to
identify in advance likely social crises and to develop programs to
cope with them. (This describes the structure of FEMA which came
"This will encourage tendencies through the next several decades
toward a Technotronic Era, a dictatorship, leaving even less room
for political procedures as we know them. Finally, looking ahead to
the end of the century, the possibility of biochemical mind control
and genetic tinkering with man, including beings which will function
like men and reason like them as well, could give rise to some
Brzezinski was not writing as a private citizen but as
National Security Advisor and a leading member of the Club of Rome
and a member of the
Committee of 300, a member of the
CFR and as a
member of the old Polish Black Nobility.
His book explains how
America must leave its industrial base behind and enter into what is
called "a distinct new historical era."
Again, quoting from The Committee of 300:
Also in 1971, at a later date, the
Mitchell Energy and Development
Corporation held its energy strategy meeting for the Club of Rome:
The recurring theme: LIMIT THE GROWTH OF THE U.S.A. Then to crown it
all, the First Global Conference on the Future was held in July of
1980, attended by 4000 social engineers and members of think tanks,
all of whom were members of or affiliated with various institutions
operating under Club of Rome umbrella organizations.
The First Global Conference on the Future had the blessing of
White House which held its own conference based on the transcripts
of the First Global Conference forum. It was called the "White House
Commission on the 1980s" and OFFICIALLY recommended the policies of
the Club of Rome "as a guide to future U.S. policies" and even went
so far as to say that the United States economy is moving out of the
This echoed the theme of Sir Peter Vickers
and Zbigniew Brzezinski and provides further proof of the control
exercised by the
Committee of 300 over U.S. affairs, both domestic
As I said in 1981, we are set up,
politically, socially and economically so that we remain locked into the
Club of Rome’s plans.
THE CLUB OF ROME
In En Route To Global Occupation: A High Ranking Government Liaison
Exposes The Secret Agenda For World Unification, written by Gary H. Kah, the
Club of Rome is described as:
Another organization that has drawn a high percentage of its members
Council on Foreign Relations is the Club of Rome.
of Rome (COR) claims to be an informal organization of less than one
hundred people who are, in their own words, "...scientists,
educators, economists, humanists, industrialists, and national and
international civil servants..." Included among these have been
members of the Rockefeller family.
Altogether, there are
approximately twenty-five CFR members who belong to the
Association for the Club of Rome. The Club had its beginnings in
April 1968, when leaders from ten different countries gathered in
Rome at the invitation of Aurelio Peccei, a prominent Italian
industrialist with close ties to the Fiat (there’s a company worth
looking at) and Olivetti Corporations.
The organization claims to
have the solutions for world peace and prosperity. However, these
solutions always seem to promote the concept of world government at
the expense of national sovereignty.
The Club of Rome has been charged with the task of overseeing the
regionalization and unification of the entire world; the Club could
therefore be said to be one step above
the Bilderbergers in the
one-world hierarchy. (COWs founder, Peccei, has been a close
associate of the Bilderbergers.) As far as I have been able to
determine, most of the directives for the planning of the world
government are presently coming from the Club of Rome.
The Club’ s findings and recommendations are published from time to
time in special, highly confidential reports, which are sent to the
power-elite to be implemented. On 17 September 1973 the Club
released one such report, entitled Regionalized and Adaptive
Model of the Global World System, prepared by COR members
Mesarovic and Eduard Pestel.
The document reveals that the Club has
divided the world into ten
political/economic regions, which it refers to as "kingdoms". While
these "kingdoms" are not set in concrete and changes could still
occur, it gives us an idea of what lies ahead.
Referring to the
Mesarovic-Pestel study, Aurelio Peccei, the Club’s
Their world model, based on new developments of the multilevel
hierarchical systems theory, divides the world into ten
interdependent and mutually interacting regions of political,
economic or environmental coherence... It will be recognized of
course that these are still prototype models. Mesarovic and Pestel
have assumed a Herculean task.
The full implementation of their work
will take many years.
SENATOR JESSE HELMS
On December 15, 1987, Senator Helms delivered a speech before
Congress that contained, in part, the following comments.
This campaign against the American people - against traditional
American culture and values - is systematic psychological warfare.
It is orchestrated by a vast array of interests comprising not only
the Eastern establishment but also the radical left. Among this
group we find the Department of State, the Department of Commerce,
the money center banks and multinational corporations, the media,
the educational establishment, the entertainment industry, and the
large tax-exempt foundations.
Mr. President, a careful examination of what is happening behind the
scenes reveals that all of these interests are working in concert
with the masters of the Kremlin in order to create what some refer
to as a New World Order.
Private organizations such as
...serve to disseminate and to
coordinate the plans for this so-called
New World Order in powerful
business, financial, academic, and official circles...
The psychological campaign that I am describing, as I have said, is
the work of groups within the Eastern establishment, that amorphous
amalgam of wealth and social connections whose power resides in its
control over our financial system and over a large portion of our
industrial sector. The principal instrument of this control over the
American economy and money is the
Federal Reserve System.
policies and the industrial sectors, primarily the multinational
corporations, are influenced by the money center banks through debt
financing and through the large blocks of stock controlled by the
trust departments of the money center banks.
Anyone familiar with American history, and particularly American
economic history, cannot fail to notice the control over the
Department of State and the Central Intelligence Agency which
Street seems to exercise...
The influence of establishment insiders over our foreign policy has
become a fact of life in our time. This pervasive influence runs
contrary to the real long-term national security of our Nation. It
is an influence which, if unchecked, could ultimately subvert our
The viewpoint of the establishment today is called
globalism. Not so
long ago, this viewpoint was called the "One-World" view by its
critics. The phrase is no longer fashionable among sophisticates;
yet, the phrase "One World" is still apt because nothing has changed
in the minds and actions of those promoting policies consistent with
its fundamental tenets.
Mr. President, in the globalist point of view, nation-states and
national boundaries do not count for anything. Political
philosophies and political principles seem to become simply
relative. Indeed, even constitutions are irrelevant to the exercise
of power. Liberty and tyranny are viewed as neither necessarily good
nor evil, and certainly not a component of policy.
In this point of view, the activities of international financial and
industrial forces should be oriented to bringing this one-world
design - with a convergence of the Soviet and American systems as
its centerpiece - into being...
All that matters to this club is the
maximization of profits resulting from the practice of what can be
described as finance capitalism, a system which rests upon the twin
pillars of debt and monopoly. This isn’t real capitalism.
It is the
road to economic concentration and to political slavery.
THE WORLD ORDER
In Eustace Mullins’ book The World Order - Our Secret Rulers, he
In 1985, as a sequel to the history of the Federal Reserve System,
this writer published The World Order as a compendium of additional
information on this subject. It never occurred to me to call it The
New World Order because my researches had traced its depredations
back for some five thousand years.
Perhaps in response to the
exposes in this volume, the spokesman for the Brotherhood of Death
went public with their claims for a "New World Order", which
essentially was the
Brave New World
described by Aldous Huxley in
his groundbreaking novel.
Behind all demands for this new order were
the same imperatives, as listed by Professor Stanley Hoffmann, in
Primacy or World Order,
"What will have to take place is a gradual
adaptation of the social, economic, and political system of the
United States to the imperatives of world order."
As Professor Hoffmann points out, the United States is the primary
target of the missiles of the New World Order because it still
retains, however perverted and distorted, the essential machinery
for a republic which provides for the freedom of its citizens.
Order’s present goals were originated by Lord Castlereagh at the
Congress of Vienna in 1815, when he handed over Europe to the
victorious Money Power, as exemplified by the presence of
This was "the balance of power", which was never a
balance of power at all, but rather a worldwide system of control to
be manipulated at the pleasure of the conspirators.
has been busily reviving this program for renewed control, as he
wrote in a think piece for Newsweek, January 28, 1991,
"We now face
’a new balance of power’. Today, it translates into the notion of ’a
new world order’, which would emerge from a set of legal
arrangements to be safeguarded by collective security."
When minions of
the World Order such as Henry Kissinger call for
"collective security", what they are really seeking is a protective
order behind which they can safely carry out their depredations
against all mankind. This was very reluctantly identified by
President George Bush, after months of dodging questions about the
"new world order" which he had publicly called for, when he finally
stated it really was "a United Nations peacekeeping force".
took us back to the Second World War, which produced the United
Walter Millis, in Road To War, America 1914-17 further
removed this program to the First World War, when he wrote,
Colonel’s (Edward Mandel House) sole justification for preparing
such a bath of blood for his countrymen was his hope of establishing
a new world order of peace and security as a result."
Note the call for "security": once again,
this is the cry of the
international criminals for protection as they carry out their
universal work of sabotage and destruction.
House had first laid out
the program for this "world order" in his book,
Philip Dru -
Administrator, in which Dru, (House himself) became the guiding
force behind the government and directed it to the goals of world
order. The same forces set up a Second World War, from which the
United Nations emerged as the new guarantor of "collective
Random House Dictionary tells us that the United Nations was created in Washington, January 2, 1942, when twenty-six nations
allied against the Axis, or "fascist" Powers. In The American
Language, H.L. Mencken says that President Roosevelt coined the
term, "United Nations" in conference with Prime Minister Winston
Churchill at the White House in December of 1941, on the eve of the
Pearl Harbor attack which manipulated us into World War II.
United Nations became an active entity at the Dumbarton Oaks
conference in 1944, when Great Britain, the United States and Russia
set it in motion as a financial dictator.
If the United Nations was created to fight "fascism", its mission
ended in 1945, when Fascism was defeated by military force.
derives its name from the bundle of rods which ancient Roman
officials carried into court to punish offenders. Thus, fascism historically means law and order, the rule of law, and the intent to
punish criminals. This, of course, is what the conspirators of the
World Order wish to avoid at all costs. The Oxford English
Dictionary defines Fascism as "one of a body of Italian nationalists
which was organized in 1919 to oppose Communism in Italy."
definitions state simply that the Fascists were organized "to fight
Bolshevism". Thus the United Nations essentially was set up to
battle against "anti-Communists" as exemplified by Germany, Italy
and Japan. When this goal was successful in 1945, the United Nations no longer had a historic mission.
Nevertheless, it continued to
function, and the Rockefellers donated the most expensive parcel of
real estate in Manhattan for its world headquarters. It was against
this background that the Governor of New York, Nelson Aldrich
Rockefeller, addressed a meeting at the Sheraton Park Hotel on July
26, 1968, in which he called for the creation of "a new world
Rockefeller ignored the fact that it was
Adolf Hitler who had
preempted this title as "My New Order" for Europe.
The phrase was an
attractive one to our politicians, as President Bush revealed when
he addressed Congress on September 11, 1990, in a speech carried
nationally on television, in which he called for,
"a new world... a
world quite different from the one we have known ... a new world
He continued to reiterate this demand in subsequent
addresses on television, declaring on January 29, 1991 in his annual
State of the Union address,
"It is a big idea - a
new world order,
where diverse nations are drawn together in common to achieve the
universal aspirations of mankind, peace and security, freedom, and
the rule of law."
He repeated this toxin on February 1, 1991 in
three separate addresses on the same day, in which he emphasized the
new world order call.
He modestly refrained from pointing out that
it was not a new phrase, and that it had been adopted by Congress in
the Great Seal of the United States, the incomplete pyramid
with its occult eye, and the phrase "Novus Ordo Seclorum" beneath
it, identifying this nation as committed to "a new world order" or a
new order for the ages which apparently depended upon pyramid power
for its fulfillment.
This symbol dated from 1776, when
Adam Weishaupt, founder of
the Illuminati sect, formulated a program
remarkably similar to that of the world order conspirators today.
Weishaupt called for:
of all monarchies and all ordered governments
Abolition of private property and inheritances
Abolition of patriotism and nationalism
Abolition of family life and the institution of
marriage, and the establishment of communal education for children
Abolition of all religion."
It was hardly accidental that
the Rothchilds, when they hired
Marx and the League of Just Men to formulate a program, received the
Communist Manifesto of 1848, which contained the above formula. Weishaupt’s activities had taken over the Freemason movement in
1782, which then became one of the vehicles for the enactment of
Its true origin in ancient Oriental despotism was
revealed on the editorial page of The Washington Post, January 5,
1992, when philosopher Nathan Gardels warned that,
"the ideal area
for the new world order would be China, not the United States."
Gardels points out that Marxism was a product of Western philosophy,
i.e., Hegel, but that a world order would produce Oriental
despotism. He supported his thesis with quotes from the Japanese
Prime Minister, who complained that "abstract notions of human
rights" should not interfere with foreign policy, and from Chinese
leaders who denounced demands for independent liberty as "garbage".
President Bush modestly points out one of his aides,
Scowcroft, as the author of the magical phrase, "new world order".
People Magazine, November 25, 1991 said,
first became evident last year, several weeks after Iraq’s invasion
of Kuwait. Again, while fishing, he and Bush came up with the idea
of "a new world order", an ambitious phrase meant to suggest a new
United States foreign policy in the post-cold war era."
TO RULE THE WORLD
Again, quoting from Eustice Mullins’ The World Order - Our Secret
Five men rule the world. This Council of Five consists of
de Rothschild, Evelyn de Rothschild, George Pratt Shultz,
Robert Roosa (from Bush’s family firm of Brown Brothers Harriman) and
vacancy, at this writing.
In the past several years, members of
Council who have died include Averill Harriman, Lord Victor
Rothschild, and Prince Thurn und Taxis of Regensburg, Germany. None
of them holds public office, but they choose who shall hold office
in the nations.
These five men comprise the apex of the pyramid of
power, the World Order. We may ask, Why should there be a World
Order? Is it not sufficient to hold absolute power in a single
nation, or in a group of nations? The answer is NO, because of the
nature of international travel, international trade, and
International travel requires that a person
may travel in peace from one nation to another, without being
molested. Excepting cases of anarchy, revolution or war, this
requirement can usually be met. International trade requires that
traders of one nation can go to another nation, transact their
business, and return with their goods or their profits.
requirement too is usually met. If not, the offended nation can
exercise military force, as Great Britain did in its Opium Wars.
It is the third requirement, international finance, which called
into being the World Order. In earlier days, when international
trade consisted of barter, payment in gold or silver or piracy, the
seizure of goods by force, there was no need for a world arbiter to
determine the value of instruments of trade.
The development of
paper money, stocks, bonds, acceptances and other negotiable
instruments necessitated a power, able to exercise influence
anywhere in the world, to declare that a piece of paper represented
one billion dollars in real wealth, or even one dollar in real
wealth. An entry on a computer, flashed from London to New York,
states that someone owes five billion dollars to someone else.
Without genuine power banking, no such sum could ever be collected,
regardless of the factuality or morality of the debt.
As anyone in
the Mafia can tell you, you don’t collect unless you are willing to
break legs. The World Order is always prepared to break legs, and
break them they do, by the millions.
What would have happened to the earliest settlers in America if they
had gone to the Indians and said,
"Give us your goods and the deeds
to your homes and lands. In return, we will give you this
beautifully printed piece of paper."
The Indians would, and did,
attack them. If the settlers arrived with an army led by a Pizzaro or
a Cortes, they took the lands without a piece of paper.
The World Order rules with its pieces of paper, but behind every
paper is a force which can be employed anywhere in the world. The
force may be disguised by various subterfuges as international
agreement, associations or other camouflage, but its base is always
The World Order rules through a simple technique,
Divide and Conquer
(Dividere et impera). Every natural or unnatural division among
people, every occasion for hatred or greed, is exploited and
exacerbated to the limit. The polarization of racial and ethnic
groups in the U.S. is accelerated by a flood of government decrees,
originating in foundation "studies", which are designed solely to
set American against American.
Only in this way can the World Order
maintain its iron grip on the daily lives of the people. The World
Order also rules by the principle of 1984 - no groups of two or more
people are allowed to gather unless the World Order has a
representative present. If you start a club of dandelion fanciers,
the Order will send someone who will be quietly helpful, avoid
taking the front position, and who will offer to pay the rent of a
meeting place or the printing of the minutes.
In more radical
groups, the Order’s representative will be the first to suggest
dynamiting a building, assassinating an official, or other violent
The international terrorism of the Communist Party originated in a
small club of German and French working men in Paris, dedicated to
quiet reading and discussion, until Karl Marx joined. It was then
converted into a revolutionary group. This one example explains the
Order’s determination to allow no group, however insignificant, to
The World Order adopted the Hegelian dialectic,
the dialectic of materialism, which regards the World as Power, and
the World as Reality. It denies all other powers and all other
It functions on the principle of thesis, antithesis and a
synthesis which results when the thesis and antithesis are thrown
against each other for a predetermined outcome. Thus the World Order
organizes and finances Jewish groups; it then organizes and finances
anti-Jewish groups; it organizes Communist groups; it then organizes
and finances anti-Communist groups. It is not necessary for the
Order to throw these groups against each other; they seek each other
out like heat-seeking missiles, and try to destroy each other.
controlling the size and resources of each group, the World Order can always predetermine the outcome.
In this technique, members of the
World Order are often identified
with one side or the other. John Foster Dulles arranged financing
for Hitler, but he was never a Nazi.
David Rockefeller may be
cheered in Moscow, but he is not a Communist. However, the Order
always turns up on the winning side. A distinguishing trait of a
member of the World Order, although it may not be admitted, is that
he does not believe in anything but the World Order. Another
distinguishing trait is his absolute contempt for anyone who
actually believes in the tenets of Communism, Zionism, Christianity,
or any national, religious or fraternal group, although the Order
has members in controlling positions in all of these groups.
are a sincere Christian, Zionist or Moslem, the World Order regards
you as a moron unworthy of respect. You can and will be used, but
you will never be respected.
It has taken centuries of patient effort for
the World Order to
attain the power it exercises today. Its origins as an international
force go back to the Phoenician slave-traders, continues through the
Phnariot families of the Byzantine Empire, then the Venetian and
Genoese traders and bankers of the Middle Ages, who moved into Spain
and Portugal, and later into England and Scotland. By the 14th
Century, the Genoese controlled the Scottish landlords.
Family of the Byzantine Empire, the Paleologues (meaning ’the Word’)
were attacked by the Gnostic faction, whose materialistic
Aristotelian philosophy was the forerunner of Hegelian dialective
and Marxism. The Paleologues devoutly believed in the Christian
faith, as expressed by the Orthodox Rite.
The materialistic Venetian
and Genoese armies, with the aid of the Turkish "infidels", looted
and conquered Constantinople, the legendary "City of God". The
Byzantine survivors recreated their culture in Russia, with Moscow
as "the third Rome". The plan to destroy the Orthodox Church with
its Romanov (new Rome) leaders was the hidden goal of the First
The victors came away with one billion dollars of the Romanov fortune, after achieving the defeat of their hated enemy,
the Orthodox Church.
During the Middle Ages, European power centers coalesced into two
camps, the Ghibellines, those who supported the Emperor’s
Hohenstaufen family, (an Italian adaptation of Weinblingen, the name
of the Hohenstaufen estate), and the Guelphs, from
Welf, the German
prince who competed with Frederick for control of the Holy Roman
Empire. The Pope then allied himself with the Guelphs against the
Ghibellines resulting in their victory.
All of modern history stems
directly from the struggle between these two powers.
also called the Neri, or Black Guelphs, and Black Nobility, were the
Normans who conquered England in the 11th century; the Genoese who
backed Robert Bruce in his conquest of Scotland, and who supported
William of Orange in his seizure of the throne of England.
victory resulted in the formation of the Bank of England and the
East India Company, which have ruled the world since the 17th
Every subsequent coup d’etat, revolution and war has
centered in the battle of the Guelphs to hold and enhance their
power, which is now the World Order.
The power of
the Guelphs grew through their control of banking and
international trade. It was extended through the Italian centers to
the north of Florence, in Lombardy, which became great financial
centers. All Italian bankers, including the Genoese, the Venetians,
and Milanese, were referred to as "Lombards": Lombard, in German,
means "papers of monetary value (Wertpapiere)"; the Lombards were
bankers to the entire Medieval world. Modern history begins with the
transfer of their operations north to Hamburg, Amsterdam, and
finally to London.
The great American fortunes originated with
the Guelph slave trade
to the colonies. Many of the slave traders doubled in piracy.
Trinity Church, whose leading vestryman later was J.P. Morgan, was
originally known as "the church of the pirates".
Capt. William Kidd
provided the material to build it in 1697, and a pew was reserved
for him. He was arrested the next year, and hanged in chains at Newgate. In 1711, a slave market was set up on Wall Street near the
church, and functioned there for many years.
Two of the most powerful influences in the world today are the
international drug trade, which began with the East India Co., and
international espionage, which began with the Bank of England.
QUALITY OF LIFE
In the 1969 book, Population, Evolution, and Birth Control: A
Collage of Controversial Ideas, author Harrison Brown writes,
If we were willing to be crowded together closely enough, to eat
foods which would bear little resemblance to the foods we eat today,
and to be deprived of simple but satisfying luxuries such as
fireplaces, gardens and lawns, a world population of 50 billion
persons would not be out of the question.
And if we really put our
minds to the problem we could construct floating islands where
people might live and where algae farms could function, and perhaps 100 billion persons could be provided for.
If we set strict limits
to physical activities so that caloric requirements could be kept at
very low levels, perhaps we could provide for 200 billion persons.
LOOK AT THE NUMBERS
In Michael Tobias’ book
World War III - Population and the Biosphere
At The End Of The Millennium, (published in 1994 by Bear & Co, Santa
Fe, NM) [N.B.- does not appear to be available now] is written,
"It is estimated that every second more than twenty-eight people are
born and ten die; that every hour, more than eleven-thousand
newborns cry out.
Each day more than 1 million human conceptions are
believed to come about, resulting in some 350,000 new cases of
venereal disease, and more than 150,000 abortions. Among those
newborns, every day 35,000 will die by starvation, 26,000 of them
Meanwhile, each twenty-four hours, the pace of war against
the planet increases, sometimes in major affronts, other times
imperceptibly, at least by our limited perceptual standards. That
war includes the loss of 57 million tons of topsoil and eighty
square miles of tropical forest and the creation of seventy square
miles of virtually lifeless desert - every day.
At current birth and
death rates, the world is adding a Los Angeles every three weeks.
average human growth rates were to continue at their present course
(the so-called "constant fertility variant") the world’s population
would reach at least 10 billion by the year 2030, 20 billion by
2070, 40 billion by 2110, and 80 billion by the year 2150."