by Christopher Story
May 11, 2010
It has transpired via special sources since we last reported that the
following top US appointed officials are receiving weekly and monthly
bribery cheques ordered by
George H. W. Bush Sr. in a desperate
ploy to ‘encourage’ them to maintain their sabotage against the Settlements
payouts and to ‘encourage’ Bank of America to continue stealing the funds
which have been allocated for the purpose, separated out and are ready to be
Joseph Biden. It is of
course an IMPEACHABLE OFFENCE,
for a Vice President of the United States to accept bribery
Rahm Emanuel, Obama's White House Chief
Timothy Geithner, Secretary of the US
Treasury. This fellow was originally picked by Dr Henry Kissinger,
the notorious triple (DVD/STASI-KGB-Mossad) penetration controller,
as a compliant, brainwashed US operative who could be relied upon to
ensure the perpetuation of Fraudulent Finance derivatives operations
based on illegal securitization, both while serving as President of
the Reserve Bank of New York (where Geithner accumulated a vast
stash of derivatives estimated to have a notional value of $500
trillion, but probably much more), and when he was transferred
seamlessly under Obama to the position of Treasury Secretary.
WAFFEN SS FRITZ
KRAEMER HELD TOP U.S. N.S.C. POST
Now in the past we have pointed out that Dr Henry ‘Heinz’ Kissinger ‘filled
in’ as the key North American agent of DVD (Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst)
after Admiral Canaris (who was not hanged at Flossenburg in April 1945, as
asserted by the Nazi disinformation legend), fell ill in 1974.
Kissinger then persuaded President Gerald Ford (a.k.a. Leslie Lynch King,
pornographer) to sack William Colby as Director of Central Intelligence
(CIA), and to replace him with the DVD’s primary representative, George H.
W. Bush Sr. After Ronald Reagan had been elected President thanks to George
H. W. Bush Sr.’s ‘Operation Surprise’ deception [see below], Bush Sr.
considered that the Presidency should be his and therefore organized the
assassination of Reagan, just as he had been involved many years earlier in
implementing the assassination of President John Kennedy.
After George Bush Sr. had been elected to the Presidency in 1988, Senator
John Tower sought appointment as Secretary of Defense, which would have
destabilized the vast Fraudulent Finance operations and scamming that Bush
Sr. intended to institutionalize within the Federal structures:
so Mr. Bush arranged for the CIA to issue a
FORMAL ELIMINATION ORDER against Senator Tower, who duly died in a plane
crash on 5th April 1991, along with his daughter and staffers.
Dr Kissinger ‘was’ ‘mentor’ to George H. W. Bush
Sr., as to Timothy Geithner.
And the ‘mentor’ of Kissinger was Dr Fritz Gustave Anton Kraemer, a special assistant, adviser and strategist serving
the US Army Deputy Chief of Staff of Operations (DCSOPS) at the Pentagon.
Kraemer, who was buried with full military
honors in Arlington Cemetery some years ago, served on the US National
Security Council (NSC), modeled after Hitler’s Security Council - with
jurisdiction to oversee the Central Intelligence Agency under the
Security Act of 1947 (a.k.a. the ‘criminals’ charter’).
It is almost certain that this Fritz Kraemer, the top Secret Team operative
in the United States, was Brigadeführer SS Fritz Kraemer, a very senior Waffen SS officer within the Hitler Nazi hierarchy, responsible for
strategic Fascist atrocities during the Second World War.
Initially a war crimes defendant at Nuremberg, Brigadeführer Waffen SS Fritz
Kraemer walked away from the Nuremberg trials into the service of the US
BRIBES FOR BIDEN ET
AL. ORDERED BY BUSH SR.
The likely source of these remittances (although this has not been
confirmed) is Deutsche Bank AG, by order of the corrupt Dr Joseph
Ackermann, Deutsche Bank’s CEO, partner with the Three Racketeers,
George H. W. Bush Sr.
Dr Helmut Kohl,
...in Deutsche AG, formerly Barrington
Investment Group, St Gallen, Switzerland.
The repeated ongoing bribery remittances are being paid to these corrupt
office-holders on the instructions of George H. W. Bush Sr., backed
by George W. Bush, who, with the Clintons and their criminal
enterprise banking lackeys and Intelligence Power intermediaries, are
desperate to hold on to the stolen funds and to prevent the loss of
stranglehold control that they fear will ensue on payout and release of the
hijacked and effectively diverted/stolen $6.2 trillion loan made available
on 19th-20th June 2007 by the
Power via the Bank of England to the criminal enterprise Bank of New York
(Mellon) which diverted the funds on the instructions of
Henry M. Paulson
Jr., then US Secretary of the Treasury - who, along with,
...is engaged (see below) ‘as we speak’ in an
ongoing PR operation to convey the entirely false impression that he favors
financial prudence, rectitude, discipline, integrity, honesty and all the
other good things that he disregarded while holding high office.
EXPOSURE FORCES 24/7 BODYGUARD PROTECTION
Furthermore, as a direct consequence (according to a sworn and notarized
Affidavit dated 31st March 2010 in this Editor’s possession) of our exposure
in these reports of the Mafioso
Salvatore R. DeFrancesco, whose name
was inserted by the Pennsylvania Department of State Corporation Bureau as
‘Secretary’ of Mr. Michael C. Cottrell’s firm Pennsylvania Investments,
Inc., THE key US official (Gold Badge) Signatory responsible for and engaged
in procuring the finalization of the Settlements payments has, since that
exposure, had to be equipped with bodyguards 24/7, and while present at the bank(s) responsible for the payments.
But it gets worse.
ELIMINATION ORDER ISSUED AGAINST GOLD BADGE PAYOUTS SIGNATORY
On 7th May, this key US official was directly threatened on
orders issued by the de facto Mafiosi
George H. W. Bush Sr. and
At 10.45 pm UK time on 8th May, the Editor of this service was, in
addition, FORMALLY advised that:
The threat against the US Gold Badge
referenced above (whose identity is known to this service) is an
OFFICIAL C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER.
Astonishingly, this intelligence has
been leaked to us by a senior C.I.A. operative, also known
(personally, in this instance) to this service.
What this means is that the Bush Crime
Syndicate, which controls the Central Intelligence Agency, has reached a
level of desperation so intense that it has resorted to an OFFICIAL, FORMAL C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER against the paymaster
Gold Badge Signatory who's in
charge of procuring the necessary outcome, having evidently run out of other
E.U. BAILOUT FINANCED
BY $1.0 TRILLION DIVERTED FROM THE SETTLEMENTS FUNDS
Over Saturday and Sunday 8th-9th May 2010, the Gold
Badge Signatory against whom the CIA has issued a formal elimination order
(confirmed to us as stated above) entered into an arrangement with agents
reporting ultimately to George H. W. Bush Sr. on the basis of some ‘deal’ or
other, as a consequence of which $1.0 trillion was released from earmarked
This money was immediately sucked into the
bowels of the
Federal Reserve and has disappeared, although since the funds
are resident within the central banking /Treasury systems, they can be
The $1.0 trillion was diverted to help fund the purchase of US Government
bonds to be deployed in the context of the European bailout operation
cobbled together over the weekend.
Irrespective of what alternative explanations for this latest scam may
The New York Times reported on 10th May as follows:
‘European Finance Ministers arrived in
Brussels on Sunday with broad agreement on the need for a fiscal
contribution from the European Union budget and some kind of fund to
stabilize the most troubled markets. By several accounts in Europe, a
500 billion-Euro figure first emerged Sunday afternoon, when Mr. Sarkozy
called Mrs. Merkel after each had spoken with Mr. Obama’.
The New York Times then elaborated with
convoluted explanations of what was finally agreed.
But we need, in fact, go
no further than where we stopped quoting the newspaper, above.
Why on earth would it be necessary for
Sarkozy and Merkel to speak to President Obama on a matter involving
the raising of funds from European sources?
Answer: Because, contrary to the
elaborate spin, the funds weren’t ever going to be raised from
European sources (although duplicated ‘shadow’ arrangements implying
such an accord, for cover purposes, may have been ‘agreed’) - given
that Germany and France are routinely in the habit of deceiving
their ‘fellow’ Europeans, especially the stupid British.
No. The funds were diverted from the Settlement
resources, following a set-up mounted over the weekend, with the full
knowledge and support of the Obama White House, working to instructions
ultimately derived from the Bush apparat, against the Gold Badge Signatory
named by the CIA as a formal target for elimination, as cited above.
Knowledge of this CIA elimination order, thought to have been gleaned by UK
eavesdroppers from a conversation between the Editor of this service and an
impeccably informed US source over the weekend, triggered highest-level
British protests to the White House on Sunday, we understand.
The British authority wished to know why a CIA
death warrant had been issued against the Gold Badge Signatory who is
equipped with full authority to procure the finalization and distribution of
the Settlements and Dollar Refunding monies.
(Answer: Because the
Bush-DVD-CIA apparat has ordered the Obama White House to block the
Settlements, of course. In this context we are told that
Obama cannot stand
the strain of the ‘Black’ forces preying on him and, given that he is
blackmailable (see below), hasn’t got the strength or the guts to tell all
concerned to cease and desist from these continuing sabotage operations).
WHITE HOUSE CAMPAIGN
TO SABOTAGE THE GOLD BADGE SIGNATORY’S PROGRESS
On top of all this, we have been specifically informed that the same Gold
Badge Signatory with the necessary Settlements authorities has been
systematically sabotaged, diverted, undermined and otherwise gravely abused
over the past few days, on orders from the Obama White House - which in turn
now OPENLY acknowledges that it takes its orders from the Chicago Mafia and
the George Bush-DVD component of the criminalized Intelligence Power, which
serves the interests not of the United States and the American people, but
of Germany and its twin, France.
Hence, in the above scenario, it was natural and routine for Merkel and
Sarkozy to check with President Barack Obama just to make sure that the
funds would be/had been diverted from the Settlements resources, so that the
latest financial wheeze designed to delay the collapse of the German
hegemony project, could be nailed into place, at least for public
RON PAUL: ‘YOU CAN’T
BAIL OUT DEBT WITH DEBT’
One Congressman who does understand the advanced form of madness driving the
White House, the Treasury and the Federal Reserve, as they continue
down the wrong path, is of course Representative
Ron Paul, who points out
that ‘you can’t bail out debt with debt’.
No, as we have repeatedly explained, you can’t:
but that is precisely what these desperate financial terrorists are doing,
in order to keep their hot air balloon in the air and the carousel
continuing by exploiting the collective stupidity of foreign central banks.
...which, for some unexplained reason, have not yet realized that the
Reserve is corrupt and compromised, and that the US authorities are
following a course guaranteed to lead to financial and economic catastrophe.
A system effectively of 90-day repos has been arranged whereby these dumb
central banks will be printing their own currencies, and stuffing them to
the Federal Reserve on behalf of the Treasury, in exchange for Treasuries.
But Treasuries are completely worthless: as
indicated below, nobody in the marketplace who’s not in need of brain
surgery wants US Treasuries these days.
So the crazed US authorities are using up the only undeserved residual
source of goodwill they have left - the rather ‘thick’ central banking
community. Foreign central bankers need to wake up and come to their senses.
By accommodating the US authorities via these
exotic operations, the foreign central banks, including the Bank of England
which has been repeatedly ripped off by these sheisters, are merely buying
more time for the desperate clique in charge of America’s progressive
financial and economic destruction, to complete the collapsing of the
The right thing to do when confronted with bandits in your front room is to
order them out of the room, or to shoot them dead. You hardly invite them to
sit down and have a nice cup of tea and cake.
The central banks that are accommodating the
American official financial criminalists are choosing the easy option: which
means that all they are doing is stacking up worse trouble for the future,
and guaranteeing that when the US financial balloon explodes, all the
subsidiary financial balloons held aloft by these myopic central bankers
will explode in tandem.
SEVERE PROBLEMS EMERGE
ON THE FOREIGN EXCHANGE MARKETS
There’s also severe trouble on the foreign exchange markets.
New York dealers are complaining that only spot
forex trades are being handled, because foreign exchange dealers can no
longer trust counterparty banks to honor spreads agreed-upon at the time of
And with the Federal Reserve arrogating to itself effectively the role of
the world’s primary foreign exchange centre, as well as the role of
rediscounter for the central banks, the emerging state of affairs is that
the most unsound, decadent, corrupt and failing central banking system in
the world believes that it can remain in business sine die by means of these
artificial arrangements involving the creation of new debt for old.
Since the named central banks evidently believe that this is possible, they
deserve what is coming to them.
As for the Bank of England, which knows all
about the private sector US Dollar Refunding operation to be conducted out
of London (as has been reconfirmed to us on 11th May, by the way), it
appears to be no better than Merkel and Sarkozy.
Like elements of MI-6, it is evidently sabotaging the
There has always been a serious problem inside the Bank of England:
and you’ve only got to observe the lugubrious physiognomy of Mr. (still not
even knighted) Mervyn King, the Bank Governor, to recognize that this
must indeed be the case. Otherwise he'd smile occasionally.
But he never does.
‘BUSHES SHOULD BE
STRUNG UP IN PUBLIC LIKE SADDAM HUSSEIN’
Reverting to the CIA's order to assassinate the Gold Badge Signatory
authority, it was explained to us on the transatlantic phone between 10.45
p.m. and 11.00 p.m. on Saturday 8th May 2010 that this desperate criminal
CIA order reflects the demands of George H. W. Bush Sr. and George W. Bush
Jr., whose selfish interests are directly opposed to those of the United
States, the American people and the Rest of the World, and that:
George H. W. Bush Sr. should be arrested
as a terrorist and should be made to suffer the same fate before TV
cameras as Saddam Hussein, to prevent the further irreparable damage
that he is knowingly inflicting on the whole world
George W. Bush Jr. should likewise
arrested as a terrorist and should be made to suffer the same fate
before TV cameras as Saddam Hussein, to prevent the further
irreparable damage that he is knowingly inflicting on the whole
This fate should, our transatlantic
correspondent explained, be fulfilled in front of the TV cameras so that
everyone holding or seeking official positions in the United States is
compelled belatedly to understand that public service involves exclusively
service to the people of the United States, and not opportunities for
George Bush Sr.’s possibly prophetic observation, indicative of his
innermost fears, that,
‘if the American people knew what we’d done, they’d
string us up from lamp posts’, may yet be realized.
BUSH SR.’S U.S. AIR
FORCE INTELLIGENCE HANDLER
IS 'OCTOBER SURPRISE' SR-71 PILOT GORDON SYMMONS
These Fascist criminals are intellectually impaired, just like Mussolini.
The re-offending criminal mentality is, by
definition, stunted. We are informed that George Bush Sr. is being handled
these days by the very same SR-71 stealth plane pilot (US Air Force
Intelligence) who flew him to Paris for the ‘October Surprise’ coup designed
to deprive Jimmy Carter of re-election, in favor of Ronald Reagan, whom
George Bush Sr. soon took steps to try to have assassinated (an operation
that was botched), so that he himself could take over as President.
It is this US Naval Intelligence operative, Gordon Symmons, resident in
Chesapeake, VA, who is telling Bush Sr. and Jr. what to do, and how to
respond to the unprecedented pressures being applied against the Bush Crime
apparat and its CIA-DVD satrap community - advising them on how to resist
all pressures, come what may, even if this means destroying the entire
global financial economy, so that they can keep what they have stolen.
This traitor Symmons is, we understand, the ONLY technician-adviser left
serving the nefarious, discredited and loathed serial criminal, George H. W.
Recall that, as we have reported, the heinous ‘Black’ fabrication
and disinformation operative Thomas Heneghan’s handler is the US Air Force
Intelligence convicted securities fraudster Otis C. Johnston (1).
The reason for the central role of US Air Force
Intelligence is that it is this rogue component of the hideously dangerous,
out-of-control US Intelligence Power that controls the United States’
BY WHITE HOUSE-C.I.A. DESPERADOS
This formal CIA elimination order and threat against the Signatory Gold
Badge turns out to be a fatal miscalculation - not least because given this
posting, the information is now in the public domain.
The standard response procedure with the
intelligence we publish is as follows:
The controlled, flaky diversionary
fabrication and disinformation websites typically pick up a
peripheral point while ignoring the critical information contained
in the report; and:
Because of several successful early
operations by MI-6 against the Editor of this service, using that
two-faced veteran UK journalist Gordon Thomas as intermediary, the
British media, being gullible and ‘unaware’ of dirty tricks, were
persuaded to pay no attention to what we publish.
The purpose of those operations,
involving direct lies about the Editor (which took place back in
2004 and 2005), and a set-up, was to ensure that the British media
would disregard the biggest financial corruption exposure reportage
operation in world history - as a result of which the ‘mainstream’
has been floundering and barking up the wrong trees ever since.
Nevertheless, we have, as a direct consequence
of the miscalculations of Mr
Wanta who, in pursuit of his own and Bush Sr.’s
objectives, magnified our platform via the French intelligence electronic
distribution network in 2006-2007, managed to perform an ‘end-run’ around
the sleepy ‘mainstream’ media - despite the 37 threats (of which seven were
death threats) received by the Editor of this service in the course of this
investigation (over the period 2002-2010).
Now we have hard intelligence that the US Gold Badge official Signatory, who
serves the United States, but also has to work with elements of British
intelligence as well, is at the receiving end of an OFFICIAL C.I.A.
ELIMINATION ORDER, the purpose being to sabotage the Settlements payouts
process by killing the holder of the crucial necessary signatory powers.
WORLD COURT ORDERED
BREAKUP OF 19 U.S. CRIMINAL FINANCIAL ENTERPRISES
All this is taking place against the background of the fact that about two
weeks ago (we now learn), a World Court order was obtained demanding the
break-up (i.e., dissolution) of 19 American banks, under the Lien powers
held by the Lien holders - which order the banks are defying, just as Bank
of America is defying its legal responsibility to disgorge the funds which
are ready for disbursal and must be paid out.
Transatlantic tensions over this are at the
FURTHER WAVES OF ARRESTS
CORRUPT PENTAGON’S CONSPICUOUS INACTIVITY
Moreover this has remained the case DESPITE further waves of arrests, on top
of the previously reported 30 or so arrests which took place in late April,
which have been reported to us and were reconfirmed on 7th May 2010. In
other words, when you yank a dozen snakes out of the snake-pit, a dozen more
take their place.
This raises the issue: what is the Pentagon doing about this - admittedly, a
pointless question, in view of the control exercised over the Bushsnakes by
US Air Force Intelligence operative Gordon Symmons?
The US military can, at the drop of a helmet,
surround the banks, procure compliance at the barrels of guns with the
absolute requirements of the Pay Orders and presumably also of the Basel
List including the Line Item covering the Refunding Loan payment - the only
problem being that it is presided over by a former CIA Director of Central
But even Mr Gates, having seen his department scammed and ransacked by
Halliburton [see the preceding report, on which NONE of the diversionary US
websites sponsored by the controlling Intelligence Power have commented, of
course], must by now realize that there is no future for the United States
if the criminalist behavior of the Intelligence Power that he fronted in the
past is allowed to persist.
So is this man the complicit, compromised and
controlled wimp he seems?
SCAMMING DETAILS SENT TO WAXMAN IN 2008
Concerning our Halliburton re-exposure (2), it is to be noted
that, as stated in our original report dated 26th May 2008, the information
in question was leaked after it had earlier been made available to
Which sheds an interesting light, does it not,
on the demands made upon
Halliburton by Mr
Waxman’s Committee, set out in
his letter dated 30th April 2010 concerning the cementing operations
conducted on the British Petroleum Oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico prior to
the blow-out (which we reproduce again as Note (3) below).
Given this connection, we prefer to rely on Mr
Waxman’s detailed knowledge of the dual scamming operation by Halliburton
within the CIA and the Pentagon as the source of his Committee’s obvious
immediate suspicions concerning the role of Halliburton in the perpetration
of this latest abomination.
Of course, Mr Waxman has a severe problem here, as well.
devastating corruption exposed in our reiterated Halliburton scamming
report, what did he do with this information in 2008?
Logic would suggest that it was his Committee
which will have made the grotesque, officially condoned scamming information
available to a Grand Jury which, we understand, has considered this scandal.
But has the information gone nowhere and been sealed, in order to protect
Cheney, the Box Gang and the corrupt Intelligence Power of which Halliburton
is itself an outgrowth?
GULF OIL RIG EXPLOSION
A ‘BLACK’ RETALIATION OPERATION AGAINST THE BRITISH
Only ten days prior to the blowout, Halliburton conveniently snapped up a
giant marine firefighting corporation for $250.00 million.
Persistent suggestions that Goldman Sachs
shorted Transocean immediately ahead of the blow-out refuse to be erased
from the record, although we removed our initial reference to this pending
further research. Most tellingly of all, as always occurs after these
atrocities, the stories keep a-changing.
There was no Deadman switch. Now,
all of a sudden, it is reported that there WAS a Deadman blowout preventer.
And to rub in BP’s humiliation, corporation
executives are now reported to have been on board at a party to celebrate
BP’s safety record, and the first explosion occurred in the room next to
where the party was being held. This would have been known days ago, one
would have thought.
Given former US criminal Vice President Richard B. Cheney’s integration with
Halliburton, what are the odds that this was indeed a malicious sabotage
operation against this prime British asset by the infuriated and utterly
desperate Bush-CIA Crime apparat, in the face of the intense pressure that
is continuing to be exerted on the Octopus by the British Monarchical Power?
Clearly, they must be rated as exceptionally
In this connection, given the extent of our partial knowledge of what
is taking place behind the scenes in the context alluded to herein, all
other ‘explanations’ for the blowout can be seen to serve the usual
obfuscation and diversion objectives.
After all, the standard ‘Black’ counterintelligence procedure after each
abomination has been perpetrated, is to seek to befuddle and bamboozle the
necessarily confused general public with contradictory, conflicting,
unprovenanced, anonymous, spoof, partial, inconsequential, fabricated and
often deliberately provocative website lies and sequences, in order to
ensure that gullible people run after the sterile red herrings served up for
that purpose, so that the crucial facts that have been revealed are bypassed
As we have frequently pointed out, this is a far more
sophisticated modus operandi than that applied by Dr Joseph Goebbels, whose
method (replicated by the Soviets) was to repeat a single lie so
relentlessly that it morphed into ‘the truth’.
With the abuse by malevolent counterintelligence of modern electronic
communications, you get untutored people who can’t distinguish between
opinion and fact to do your dirty work for you: hence the invention of that
diabolical cesspit called ‘the Blog’.
OUR EXPOSURE OF THE
LIFTED WITHOUT ATTRIBUTION, AND OUT OF CONTEXT
A recent case in point was the irresponsible posting, WITHOUT ATTRIBUTION
and completely out of context, by
www.freerupublic.com, of our originating
briefing report on the assassination of the youngest son of lawyer John Hemenway, who brought a Quo
Warrantor action against President Obama.
John Hemenway Jr., 47,
was shot dead in Bedford,
VA; and as you must surely be aware, by definition, any atrocity that takes
place in Virginia, home of the criminalized US Intelligence Power, is always
Our text having been lifted without attribution, the abomination was then
elaborated by people (via that wayward website’s attached ‘Blog’) with
absolutely no knowledge of the situation, divesting themselves of knee-jerk
reactions to a state of affairs of the utmost gravity, as evidenced by the
President Obama ‘joked’ about his
missing birth certificate at an event for the ‘mainstream’ press on
the self-same day as the shooting.
After we had been informed that an
autopsy was taking place, the body of John Hemenway Jr. was cremated
the day after he was shot.
A strange blanket of silence descended
on the matter after our initial report, and as far as we can gather,
no report about the shooting appeared in any so-called ‘mainstream’
Our impeccable US source informed the
Editor on 3rd May:
‘I personally know that John (Jr.) would never
commit suicide for any reason, and it’s strange that nobody knows
what happened… I don’t think his family will ever be able to find
out what happened to him, and the authorities haven’t disclosed
anything which could be helpful to the family’.
Meanwhile John Hemenway Sr., aged 84, bears the
burden not only of the Quo Warranto lawsuit against Obama but also of the
sudden loss, by an ‘unexplained shooting’ in Bedford, VA, of his youngest
son of the same name.
The Memorial took place on 4th May, as we have reported, and we repeat the
text of the Memorial as Note (4) below, just in case anybody dares to doubt
what we have stated.
WAS THIS ANOTHER C.I.A.
OR WAS THE SHOOTING ORDERED BY OBAMA (OR BOTH)?
Knowing the depths of depravity to which the serpents that we are having to
expose routinely descend, it is far from unlikely that the Presidential
‘joke’ referenced above, which the gullible and increasingly discredited US
‘mainstream’ media representatives thought was funny, represented a ‘Black’
act of ‘in-your-face’ defiance by Mr Obama over the legitimacy issue; and if
that obvious deduction is correct, then of course the President of the
United States, with his known Mafioso links (see below), knew all about the
hit, didn’t he?
Which leaves the unresolved issue of why the body was cremated almost
immediately after we were told that an autopsy was taking place. This kind
of thing only happens when a dirty deed has to be covered up.
The suggestion from one of our sources is that
John Hemenway Jr’s wife ordered the immediate cremation: but given the known
sunny character of the late Mr Hemenway Jr., a patent attorney described by
our main informant as ‘a very kind soul’, none of this ‘stacks’.
As a consequence of which, we entertain the very gravest suspicion about
this murder - namely that it was ordered or sanctioned by the President of
the United States: or that it was another FORMAL C.I.A. ELIMINATION ORDER.
Which amounts to the same thing.
WHERE WANTA SET UP BUSH ACCOUNTS,
BOMBED, THREE KILLED: NOT A COINCIDENCE
Meanwhile, amid the revolutionary disintegration in Athens recently, it has
not passed unnoticed that it was Citibank, in Athens, that was bombed, and
where three bankers were killed.
It will be recalled that we have repeatedly
noted the role of Citibank, Athens, as the counterparty holder of a vast
stash of worthless derivatives exchanged by complicit Greek personnel for
Euros, in trading collaboration with agents of the Bush Financial Crime
apparat. And where, inter alia, did the felon, serial fraudster and Bush Sr.
courier-lackey, Leo/Lee Wanta, open accounts on behalf of his boss, George
Why, with Citibank, Athens...
And it was the serial fraudster and felon Leo/Lee Wanta - who deceived the
Editor of this service and exploited our publicity platform for 18 months,
while scamming him of his $35,000 loan - and who, having established the
Ionian Bank in Cyprus on behalf of Bush Sr., worked with the Italian-based
CIA counterpart operative, Marco Saba, effectively preparing the bankrupting
‘EUROPEAN CRISIS’ MADE
IN WASHINGTON, D.C.
So, as you can see, the ‘European crisis’ is directly connected to, and a
specific consequence of, the Fraudulent Finance operations mounted by the
Bush/CIA/DVD criminal apparat that we alone have been burdened with
exposing, and which the so-called ‘mainstream’ media have sidestepped and
ignored - thanks, in the case of the British press, to its stupidity in
paying any attention to the malicious early operations of MI-6 perpetrated
against the Editor of this service, whose job is to go behind the financial
news to bring our subscribers intelligence not reflected in the
In the case of The Daily Telegraph, for
which the Editor used to contribute extensive op-ed articles in the
1970s and 1980s, the false witness lies about the Editor were almost
certainly fed in by the veteran journalist Gordon Thomas, who writes
articles for the newspaper to this day.
EARLY BUSH II/MI-6
ATTEMPTS TO STOP OUR INVESTIGATIONS
USING GORDON THOMAS AS DUPLICITOUS
In late 2004, Gordon Thomas informed the Editor that after George W. Bush
was ‘re-elected’ that November, US official sources asked MI-6:
you going to do about Mr Story?’
MI-6 then responded by mounting an entrapment operation exploiting the fact
that the Editor had unfortunately not realized that American Free Press,
which had commissioned an article by him, was in fact the phoenix version of
the notorious Spotlight publication, run by an anti-Semitic CIA cadre out of
an office in lower Pennsylvania Avenue.
The simple set-up technique, in which the CIA
cadre running the operation directly participated, was to arrange for a
Telegraph journalist to call up the Pennsylvania Avenue office during the
period when the Editor was in that office (in order to collect a cheque
which of course the CIA cadre had failed to pay).
MI-6 also disseminated lies to the British media
about the Editor’s alleged involvement with
Mark Thatcher in connection with
the Equatorial Guinea fiasco, and with the dirty drug-dealer and Blair
Bernie Ecclestone, in connection with some scamming operation out
Gordon Thomas was directly involved as ‘Black’
intermediary in the promulgation to the Editor of these lies, which he said
had been disseminated ‘in order to make you sit up’.
The Editor’s personal experience, confirmed by
others, is that everyone who ventures to expose these serpents is liable to
find himself at the receiving end of malicious lies, false witness, and
usually attempts at a set-up.
We were set up and exploited by Mr
when we severed relations with that snake, the Editor thought that a million
emails would arrive from clever-clogs lambasting him with ‘told you so’
In actual fact, we didn’t receive ONE SINGLE COMMUNICATION to that effect.
When the Editor repeatedly asked knowledgeable US sources why this was so,
the tired response was this:
‘Wanta is the world’s most accomplished
deceiver and liar. He’s deceived everybody. So your experience isn’t
When MI-6 considered that they had
deceived the 'mainstream' media by bearing false witness against the
Editor of this service, they were able to inform their criminal
colleagues in the Bush II Administration that they had successfully
'handled' the situation, which turned out to be inaccurate.
NOBODY WHO’S NOT IN
NEED OF BRAIN SURGERY
WANTS TO BUY THE U.S. TREASURY’S ‘TRASHETS’ ANY
On 5th May, the Financial Times reported from New York that the US Treasury
had announced the first reduction in US Government debt sales since 2007,
reflecting ‘improving economic growth’ which was ‘buoying tax receipts’.
The official spin, absorbed lock stock and
barrel by the British financial newspaper, was that given an economic
turnaround, the US Treasury didn’t need to sell as much debt as it needed to
Quarterly debt sales due in the week beginning on 10th May would
be reduced by $3.0 billion, to $78 billion, compared with the February
U.S. TREASURY’S LIES
AND SPIN EXPOSED BY
THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET’S DEBT
However if we look at the US Office of Management and Budget’s statistics
(notwithstanding their notorious unreliability), we find that the Statutory
Debt Limit was raised to $6.4 trillion on 28th June 2002, and to $10.6
trillion on 30th July 2008.
On 17th February 2009, in parallel with Mr
Obama’s first Budget, the Statutory Debt Limit was increased from $11.3
trillion (effective from 3rd October 2008) to $12.4 trillion for the rest of
Fiscal Year 2009.
If we review another OMB series, we find that
what the official budgetologists refer to as ‘Gross Federal Debt’, at
$9,986,082 billion, is offset by ‘Debt Held by Government Accounts' of
$4,183,032 billion, falsely implying that the actual indebtedness of the
Federal Government at the end of the 2008 Fiscal Year was $5,803,050.
However as we have repeatedly explained both
here and in our International Currency Review, ‘Debt Held by Government
Accounts’ represents the mandatory entitlement obligations of the Federal
This ‘smoke and mirrors’ arrangement hides the enormity of the Government’s
true indebtedness (on the basis of the OMB’s official data, which are the
only data available, even though they are largely nonsense), under a
statutory requirement whereby the surpluses accrued in the so-called Budget
‘Trust Funds’ are ‘invested’ in the ‘Federal Funds’ accounts (current
expenditure) - which means that these earmarked surpluses have all been
squandered. But the future obligations which the surpluses existed to fund,
Therefore, instead of being subtracted from the ‘Gross Federal Debt’ data,
these amounts (which are referenced by OMB as ‘Debt Held by Government
Accounts’) have to be ADDED BACK TO the Gross Federal Debt data. With this
necessary adjustment, the ‘Adjusted Federal Debt’ using these numbers
amounted to $14,169,114 billion at the end of Fiscal Year 2008.
On the same calculations, the ‘Adjusted Federal
Debt’ aggregates $18,275,577 billion by the end of Fiscal Year 2010 (30th
September 2010), reaching $19,789,733 billion by 30th September 2011 and
$25,378,196 billion by 30th September 2015. And, as indicated, these
calculations use the OMB’s unreliable statistics.
Just how unreliable they are is now openly acknowledged by the Office of
Management and Budget itself, which has XXXXXXXXXed out the later numbers
because the OMB seeks to avoid excessive condemnation for misleading the
public (which it has in fact been doing at least since President Carter’s
time, but never mind). If you press an XXXXXXXXXed line, a number will
appear at the top indicating what is hidden.
Presumably the idea here is to convey to the
fleeting observer that the OMB is hedging its bets, but the ‘experts’ can
discover what is being covered up by pressing the hidden number (on the
There is no difference between these presentations and the fake numbers we
used to have to grapple with under overt Communism, when analysts were
confronted with the impossible task of making sense of the falsified
statistics promulgated by
For good measure, the OMB’s published budget
deficit data, which entail known falsifications, are worth adding here.
According to these data, the United States’
published Federal budget deficit for Fiscal Year 2008 was $458,555 billion.
The figure for Fiscal Year 2009 rose to $1,412,686 billion, and the OMB's
official projection for Fiscal Year 2010 is $1,555,582 billion.
There is no way that these data can possibly be reconciled with the US
Treasury’s 5th May 2010 announcement, heavily spun by 'Hill and Knowlton',
that it is now possible to reduce quarterly debt sales at all - sales, that
is, of debt to GENUINE PURCHASERS.
But in order to disguise the reality - that it cannot sell Treasuries into the gullible financial markets as of
old, so it has been ‘selling’ Treasuries to the Federal Reserve (and
probably to its own accounts) instead - the US Treasury is representing that
‘things are improving’, which will alleviate the pressure to sell more debt.
IT’S NOT THE ECONOMY,
STUPID: IT’S THE MATHEMATICS
Unfortunately for the Treasury’s spin-meisters, not everyone is quite as
gullible as the financial market gurus so eagerly sought out by ‘mainstream’
financial journalists, as they seek to pad out their dreary reports on such
For it is neither here nor there HOW MUCH THE
ECONOMY IMPROVES, even if it IS improving: and who knows, given official,
Comecon-style manipulation of the macroeconomic data as well?
It is not variations in economic activity and the consequent increase or
decrease in the tax take which are the pertinent factors here. It is the
RELENTLESS LOGIC OF THE UNDERLYING DEBT MATHEMATICS, some detail of which we
have demonstrated above (albeit having had to use the OMB’s intrinsically
What this means is that even if the US economy were to grow at Chinese
rates, the TREND of the underlying US debt mathematics would not change for
many, many years.
Such growth rates would indeed fill gaps and would
alleviate the need for the Treasury to issue debt on the permissive scale to
which it had become accustomed. But the logic of the mathematics would not
be changed: the pace of the deterioration would be reduced, and no time
horizon that makes sense could be relied upon to pinpoint the ‘magic’ moment
when debt accumulation stalls, and moves into reverse.
Of course there is no prospect of the US economy (now that it’s so
irrevocably Third World in so many respects) ever growing at such rates: so
further consideration of this model would be futile.
Which reveals what REALLY underlies this PR statement carried in the
Financial Times on 5th May:
The US Treasury cannot issue Treasuries to
marketplace buyers on any meaningful scale, which means that its Treasuries
issuance fest has collapsed, as we predicted would happen: all it can do is
to issue paper to the Federal Reserve.
And lo! When we review the Office of Management and Budget’s data on this
score, we find that the column headed ‘Debt Held by the Public’ is
XXXXXXXXXed right the way back to 1983.
This was emphatically NOT the case
when we last examined these data several months ago.
Within the category ‘the Public’, resides the Federal Reserve itself, as the
Fed is a private sector institution. Now the OMB numbers reflecting official
debt held by the Federal Reserve ‘remain intact’ (i.e., have not been
Which means, does it not, that the adjacent
column obfuscates the situation: otherwise the OMB would surely not have
considered it necessary to XXXXXXXXX these data right back to 1983.
SOUND MECHANICS OF THE
APPROVED PRIVATE SECTOR DOLLAR REFUNDING OPERATION
As you know, all this gross deception could have been avoided had the loan
made available by the British Monarchical Power on 19th-20th June 2007 via
the Bank of England not been hijacked and diverted by Bank of New York
(Mellon) on the instructions of then US Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson
Jr., the former CEO of Goldman Sachs, which is the subject of the SEC’s
devastating Civil Complaint [see text in our report dated 18th April 2010].
Those loan funds were intended for the Dollar Refunding operation agreed to
by the Group of Seven Financial Powers in both 2006 and 2007, and urged by
Her Majesty the Queen 'for the sake of the whole of humanity'.
would appear that, even at this late stage, observers have simply not
understood what all this is about, we re-explain it in this segment.
The US Treasury’s decadent intention, held together by the Bush bribes
accepted by Geithner, Biden and Emanuel (see above), has been not only to
retain the $6.2 trillion loan (i.e. to STEAL the loan funds in perpetuity),
but to retain control over the Refunding by performing it below the radar
internally - and pulling the wool, as always, over the eyes of the gullible
(Market participants and analysts think they are
exceedingly clever at all times, but usually nit-pick around ephemeral data
and information, failing to see the density of the wood behind the trees).
So here’s an elementary lesson in economic
accounting, applicable to the Refunding:
If the Government does the refunding
(e.g., by issuing exotic instruments and engaging in 'creative'
trading with counterparties with incredible rates of return), the
accounting position is that the other side of the balance sheet
accumulates MORE DEBT to offset the instruments issued.
Furthermore, as in this context the
Government cannot tax itself, NO MEANINGFUL REAL TAX REVENUES
ACCRUE ON-BALANCE SHEET to the Treasury, which is the object of
By contrast, as the $6.2 trillion
sovereign fund is a LOAN, to be used exclusively in the PRIVATE
SECTOR (NOT within the Government sector, below the radar where it
is open to ongoing abuse) the following entirely opposite accounting
The transparent, taxable securities
transactions conducted in the private sector Dollar Refunding
operation generate ON-BALANCE SHEET TAX REVENUES payable
directly to the Treasury ON-BALANCE SHEET, thereby immediately
amortizing accumulated ‘background’ debt.
The other side of the balance sheet
to these transactions is the LOAN FUND.
Is it really necessary to acquire First Class
degrees in accounting and economics in order to UNDERSTAND that THIS is THE
SOLUTION, and THE ONLY SOLUTION?
And is it not a fact that the persistent opposition to this G-7-approved
solution by the Bush II and Obama White House, and by the Paulson and
Geithner Treasury, represents not merely grotesque dereliction of the
incumbents’ duties to serve the interests of the American people and the
United States to the absolute exclusion of all other considerations, but
also entitles these highest-level operatives to be arrested for TREASON
AGAINST THE UNITED STATES?
OF COORDINATED ‘BLANKFEINISM’
Meanwhile some of the most egregious perpetrators and financial criminals
have been plasticizing in the mirror of late to perfect their expertise in
the art of Leninist ‘contradictions’ - a.k.a. speaking out of the left-hand
side of their mouths as though no-one had noticed that their actions have
all along diverged from their verbal assertions.
First, the former US Treasury Secretary, Henry M. Paulson Jr., the man who
ordered the $6.2 trillion sovereign loan fund to be hijacked, diverted and
effectively stolen in 2007 [see above], appeared before the Financial Crisis
Inquiry Commission on 6th May to ‘caution’ that all investment banking
transactions must be done ‘with the highest standards of fair dealing’.
Observe how this criminal financier and operative made his point: he told
the Commission that such transactions ‘must’ conform to high standards,
which is not the same thing as acknowledging that Goldman Sachs and the
other Fraudulent Finance specialist houses have been engaged in implementing
‘the highest standards of fair dealing’ or are currently so engaged.
In other words, Paulson said nothing at all. He just made a statement to
which no objection could be taken and which bore no relationship at all to
the routine Fraudulent Finance operations over which he presided as Treasury
Secretary and as CEO at Goldman Sachs.
Moreover, like all these criminal financiers, Paulson skated over the fact
that under US law, and in all Common Law countries, securitization is
absolutely illegal [see our report dated 18th April 2010].
For Paulson, there was never any problem with
securitization - which, being translated, means that Paulson remains
content, to this day, that the Rule of Law should continue to be trampled
on, which as we have so extensively exposed, is in any case his normal modus
S.E.C. CASE AGAINST
GOLDMAN WALKS ROUND THE ELEPHANT IN THE BEDROOM
Of course, as we have pointed out, the very Civil Case brought by the
Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC] itself against Goldman Sachs [see
report, 18th April 2010] addresses alleged fraudulent behavior by Goldman
Sachs but EVADES the broader reality that securitization is illegal.
In other words, the SEC’s case against Goldman
Sachs addresses fraudulent operations conducted by the institution within
the overall context of illegality.
The SEC could perfectly well, in theory, round
on all these corrupt speculating Fraudulent Finance institutions on the
ground that they have been engaged in marketing fraudulent securities,
beginning with the central reality that if the original mortgagor (in the
case of mortgage-backed securities -
MBS) had not knowingly given his or her
specific written consent to the assignment of the asset, then all derivative
transactions have been and are NULL AND VOID.
SECURITIZATION IS ILLEGAL, ALL DERIVATIVES
CONTRACTS ARE FRAUDULENT AND THEREFORE VOID
As previously noted, this is the gigantic elephant in the bedroom.
Because what this means is that 100% of
derivatives transactions, past and ongoing, are fraudulent; and where a
contract is entered into to facilitate fraud, it is automatically voided.
So, like former US Treasury Secretary Paulson,
the SEC is itself co-conspiring in the perpetuation of the fabrication that
securitization is legal, which is not the case. We explained all this in
excruciating detail in International Currency Review, Volume 34, Number 2,
the theme of which was ‘The Legalization of Financial Corruption’.
In fact, the ‘legalisation’ implied is illusory: what has happened is that
‘because everyone was doing it’, the immense breach of the law that this
criminal behavior entailed was simply ‘legalised’ by the authorities turning
a blind eye to what was going on - something that came easily, as so many
high-level officials were enriching themselves in the process.
PAUL VOLCKER DESTROYS
HIS REPUTATION FOR INTEGRITY
On the same date (6th May 2010), the former Chairman of the
Federal Reserve Board, Paul Volcker, now Chairman of President
Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board, unilaterally destroyed his
reputation for integrity by writing a letter to Senators stating that,
‘The provision of derivatives by commercial
banks to their customers in the usual course of a banking relationship
should not be prohibited’.
In other words, Volcker agrees with Paulson that
the Rule of Law should continue to be disregarded by the banks, thereby
destroying his reputation for integrity.
Mr Volcker’s letter, sent from his Fifth Avenue, New York City, apartment,
read as follows:
May 6, 2010
Dear Mr Chairman [Senator Dodd]
A number of people, including some members of your Committee, have asked
me about the proposed restrictions on bank trading in derivatives as set
out in Senator Lincoln’s proposed amendment to Section 716 of S. 3217. I
thought it best to write to you directly about my reaction.
I well understand the concerns that have motivated Senator Lincoln in
terms of the risks and potential conflicts posed by proprietary trading
in derivatives concentrated in a limited number of commercial banking
organizations. As you know, the proposed restrictions appear to go well
beyond the proscriptions on proprietary trading by banks that are
incorporated in Section 619 of the reform legislation that you have
My understanding is that the prohibitions
already provided for in Section 619, specifically including the Merkley-Levin
amended language clarifying the extent of the prohibition on proprietary
trading by commercial banks, satisfy my concerns and those of many
others with respect to bank trading in derivatives.
In that connection, I am also aware of, and share, the concerns about
the extensive reach of Senator Lincoln’s proposed amendment. The
provision of derivatives by commercial banks to their customers in the
usual course of a banking relationship should not be prohibited.
In sum, my sense is that the understandable concerns about commercial
bank trading in derivatives are reasonably dealt with in Section 619 of
your reform bill as presently drafted. Both your Bill and the Lincoln
amendment reflect the important concern that, to the extent feasible,
derivative transactions be centrally cleared or traded on a regulated
These are needed elements of reform.
I am sending copies of this letter to Secretary Geithner
and to Senators Shelby, Merkley, Levin and Lincoln.
No matter, then, that securitization is illegal so that all derivative
transactions are likewise illegal under US and Common Law. Neither Paulson
nor, it is now clear, Paul Volcker, are in any way concerned about the fact
that these transactions are ALL FRAUDULENT.
So far as Mr Volcker is concerned, the banks should be allowed to CONTINUE
ENGAGING IN FRAUDULENT FINANCE. Maybe it’s all got too much for the former
Alternatively, he may be indifferent to the fact that, with this single
letter, he has unilaterally destroyed his towering reputation for integrity
BY ‘PUT-UPON’ BLANKFEIN
On 7th May, Mr
Lloyd Blankfein addressed investors at
Goldman Sachs’ Annual Meeting, behind a significant police presence in the
Metaphorically holding his hands out to create an impression of penitence,
Mr Blankfein promised a ‘rigorous self-examination’ of his firm’s business
practices. He would promote ‘ethical principles’, implying that these had
been lacking in the past (accurate).
An experienced US annual meetings
attendee, Evelyn Davis, branded Blankfein as ‘Lord Goldmine’, suggesting
that he should resign by Monday 10th May in order to retain ‘what little
dignity’ he had left.
Mr Blankfein was forced to field two hours of hostile questioning from
disaffected investors at the meeting, amid reports that Goldman has begun
discussions with the SEC in pursuit of a possible out-of-court settlement of
the SEC’s Civil Case against the firm.
But the Civil Case opens up the prospect of
multiple litigation against Goldman, including R.I.C.O. suits: so Goldman’s
259 lawyers may have advised the firm to seek an accommodation with the SEC
as quickly as possible.
It is probably unnecessary to over-emphasize the obvious point that a
financial institution that needs to employ 259 lawyers must, by definition,
be accustomed to sailing ‘close to the wind’.
BUSH II AND CLINTON
CAUTION AGAINST GREED IN CHICAGO
You may now need to have your private vomitarium handy.
To complete this account of highest-level
financial fraudsters attempting to transform themselves verbally into
paragons of rectitude, Forbes magazine reported on 6th May that former
President William Jefferson Rockefeller-Clinton and George W. Bush appeared
together at a ‘Biotechnology Conference’ in Chicago held between 3rd and 6th
It was on 6th May that the Settlements payouts
were once again aborted, and the sabotage was committed, we understand, via
these criminal Presidents’ Mafiosi associates based in Chicago, where the
FBI’s Division Five is allied with the underworld.
The gullible or duplicitous
Forbes reporter wrote that,
‘on a visit to Chicago on Tuesday, I was
very encouraged to hear Bill Clinton and George W. Bush deliver [on 4th
May] a remarkably non-partisan message to elected officials regarding
future regulatory or tax code changes.
Speaking at the Bio International
Convention, the two former Presidents suggested that legislators
recognize the problems and address the greed, but they cautioned against
inhibiting capital formation, since Wall Street is where companies find
risk capital to develop the innovations that benefit us all’.
‘The forum where they spoke wasn’t open to
the public or the press’ [begging the question of what the Forbes
journalist was doing there, then], so there was not a peep about it on
the 24-hours-a-day news stations. Too bad. It would be nice for people
to learn that when it comes to some of the critical issues, politicians
may not be as polarized as skeptics suggest’.
Would you like us to summarize what we think of
Forbes magazine on the basis of this offering?
The level of ignorance of the real
criminal world displayed by the author of this verbiage cannot be
encapsulated in the English language.
The two self-acknowledged criminal
Presidents’ ‘advice’ to Congress to ‘address the greed’ represented
a typical example of ‘Blankfeinist’ deceit.
Here are two of the
greediest individuals who have ever disgraced the American political
scene, whose entire existence both in and out of office has been
motivated precisely by GREED, suggesting that Congress should
Do you now begin to understand the true meaning of
double-mindedness, which masks such an unfathomable darkness of the
By ‘recommending’ that greed should be
‘addressed’, these inveterate deceivers convey the impression that they
disapprove of greed, when greed is what has driven them all their lives.
The author’s ignorance incorporates a
failure to understand that these two criminal finance operatives
have all along been in sync as well as rivals, so when they jointly
decide to sing a particular song for the benefit of the dumbed-down
goyim, they do so for a reason.
The naive idea that these operatives are
principled people of goodwill, when in fact they are egregious
serial financial terrorists driven by GREED who should, we are
advised, receive the same treatment as Saddam Hussein, tells you
that Forbes either looks the other way, or else languishes in a lazy
fantasy world which has no observable connection with reality.
THE CHICAGO MAFIOSO
FORK POINTED AT OBAMA
Obama is reported to rely on five people, of whom four are from
Chicago, where Obama knows how ‘the system’ works and is believed to be
familiar with the notorious Drake Hotel, where the Mafiosi meet and do their
deals with the compromised and blackmailed official structures.
Rahm Emanuel, his abrasive Chief of
(until recently) Valerie Jarrett
while the fifth kitchen cabinet member
is Robert Gibbs, his chief spokesman
In Chicago, an early Obama supporter was Alderman Edward Burke, first
elected in 1969, who runs the Chicago show for Mayor Richard Daley and
chairs the city’s Finance Committee.
To cite the City of Chicago’s website:
‘As Chairman of the City Council’s powerful
Committee on Finance, Alderman Burke holds the city’s purse strings and
is responsible for all legislative matters pertaining to the city’s
finances, including municipal bonds, taxes and revenue matters. Alderman
Burke became Chairman for the second time in 1989. He previously served
from 1983 to 1987’.
In 2001, the Daily Herald reported that Burke
was an early supporter of Mr Rod Blagojevich’s campaign to become Governor
On 10th February 1985, a Chicago Tribune article
reported how a Chicago mobster, Victor Albanese, wound up on the city
payroll, asserting that Alderman Burke performed a favor for John D’Arco, a
Democratic Committeeman, by hiring the mobster as a ‘ghost employee’, on
$900 a month.
John D’Arco was identified by a former FBI agent, William Roemer, as being a
co-opted member of the Chicago Mafia, also known as ‘the Outfit’.
time, John D’Arco was Chicago’s First Ward Alderman, but was forced to step
down after the FBI caught him at a meeting with the ‘Outfit’ boss, Sam
Giancana, near Chicago’s O’Hare Airport. D’Arco has been one of Alderman
Edward Burke’s links into the Chicago ‘Outfit’.
Another link between Alderman Burke and the Chicago Mafia was Alderman Fred Roti, who died in 1999, who was the most powerful Chicago City Alderman in
In 1989, The Washington Post reported that the former FBI agent, William
Roemer, had identified Fred Roti in March 1983 as the ‘Outfit’s’ operative
on Chicago’s City Council in testimony before the United States Senate
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. In 1991, the US Attorney General
identified Roti as a member of the Chicago Mafia.
In 1999, the US Justice Department described
Fred Roti as the Chicago Mafia’s ‘patronage boss’, elaborating as follows:
‘Fred Roti was convicted of RICO conspiracy,
bribery and extortion regarding the fixing of criminal cases inside the
Circuit Court of Cook County, including murder cases involving organized
crime members or associates and was sentenced to 48 months’
imprisonment. Roti was released from prison in 1997.
As First Ward Alderman, Roti was a key
political patronage boss and, along with his codefendant Pat Marcy, a
fixer for the Chicago Outfit.
Roti has directly participated in
interfering with the rights of the members of LIUNA (Laborers’
International Union of North America) in the selection of their officers
and officials in that he has improperly influenced the selection of
officers of CIDC (Chicago Laborers’ District Council) and has been
responsible for the pervasive hiring of LaPietra crew members and
associates at the Chicago Streets and Sanitation Department. Roti is a
made member of the Chicago Outfit’.
Alderman Burke, Obama’s champion, regularly met
Roti at the Counsellors Row Restaurant across the street from Chicago City
Hall. It didn’t bother Alderman Burke that Roti was a mob boss.
On the contrary, shortly after Roti’s death,
Burke sponsored a City Council resolution honoring Roti’s life, which read
as follows [bearing in mind that the phrase ‘family members’ has a double
meaning in this context]:
‘Fred B. Roti, a committed public servant, a
cherished friend of many and a good neighbor to all, will be greatly
missed and fondly remembered by his many family members, friends and
On 22nd April 2010, Sam Adam Esq., an attorney
for Rod Blagojevich, filed a motion in the United States District Court for
the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division before Judge James B. Zagel, for the Court to issue a trial subpoena to President Obama concerning
the disgorging of redacted portions of all tapes and sealed information
released under a Protective Order dated 14th April 2009 concerning the
scandal surrounding the appointment of Mr Obama’s vacant Senate seat by
Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich [CV 08CR888].
Without going into the convoluted detail of the corruption implied by the
Motion, its text states [paragraph 8] that ‘President Barack Obama has
stated publicly that he was,
"confident that no representatives of mine
would have any part of any deal related to this seat".
[Press conference by President-elect
Obama, 11th December 2008].
The word ‘deal’ is defined by the
Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary as a,
‘transaction; bargain; contract; an
arrangement for mutual advantage’.
Paragraph 9 of the Motion continues:
‘Yet, despite President Obama stating that
no representatives of his had any part of any deals, [a] labor union
president told the FBI and the United States Attorneys that he spoke to
[the] labor union official on November 3, 2008, who received a phone
message from Obama that evening’ and that Obama had recommended Jarrett
as his Senate replacement.
The case is much more complex than this, but the general flavor can be
obtained, for instance, from Pagaraph 14: ‘President Obama has direct
knowledge of allegations made in the indictment [against Blagojevich].
In addition, President Obama’s public statements contradict other
witness statements, specifically those made by [the] labor union
official and Senate Candidate B. It is anticipated that [the] labor
union official will be a witness for the Government'.
'His accounts of events directly related to the charges in the
indictment are contradicted by President Obama’s public statement'.
Paragraph 20 reads:
‘President Barack Obama has direct knowledge
of the Senate seat allegation [‘deal’]. President Obama’s testimony is
relevant to three fundamental issues of that allegation.
First, President Obama contradicts the testimony of an important
Secondly, President Obama’s testimony is relevant to
the necessary element of intent of the defendant.
Thirdly, President Obama is the only one who can say if emissaries were sent on his behalf,
who those emissaries were and what, if anything, those emissaries were
instructed to do on his behalf.
All of these issues are relevant and
necessary for the defense of Rod Blagojevich’.
Other dimensions involving Obama’s ‘former’
Chicago (mobster) friend Tony Rezko are also raised in the Motion, which
also points out that as all these matters occurred prior to President
Obama’s Inauguration, none are covered by Executive Privilege.
‘[Federal precedent holds that] no person,
even a President, is above the law and that in appropriate judicial
proceedings, documents and other tangible evidence within the very
office of the President may be obtained for use in those judicial
proceedings. Similarly, where the President himself is a percipient
witness to an alleged criminal act, the President must be amenable to
subpoena as any other person would be’.
‘Here, President Obama is a critical
witness. All of President Obama’s testimony would entail evidence he
witnessed before he became President and does not involve Executive
OPERATIONS TARGETING OBAMA TO PREVENT HIM SETTLING
What is the relevance of all this in our broader context? What has been
summarized above is evidence of Obama’s Chicago Mafioso connections and
The whole point about Obama, and why he surfaced
in place of Hillary Clinton, is that he can be blackmailed on several levels
simultaneously. The best known dimension is the birth certificate/legitimacy
issue, which could be used at any time for that purpose.
But an even more potent prospective blackmail dimension is the Chicago
‘Outfit’ connection and background.
The Chicago operative Rahm Emanuel was installed
as White House Chief of Staff in order to ensure the continued
leverage/effectiveness of this prospective blackmail dimension - the
objective being to intimidate and control the new President so that he could
be relied upon to continue blocking the Settlements payouts (involving many
trillions of dollars) in conformity with the Bush-Clinton criminal
fraternity’s intention to hold on to what they have stolen, to crash the
system and thereafter to pull the off-balance sheet funds onto the 'books'
buying up the world's real assets at firesale prices.
That is what is in process, and what the Mafiosi
have in mind.
Rod Blagojevich’s Motion to subpoena President Obama emerged from a separate
blackmail operation against Obama mounted by Blagojevich himself, who is in
fact a minor serpent in the Chicago snakepit.
More to the point, both Clintons and Joseph
Biden were and remain involved in this operation to control Obama by means
(as we suggested a long time ago) of blackmail.
And it was out of Chicago that George Bush Sr.
pulled off the ransacking of Continental Illinois Bank & Trust Company,
where the Delmarva funds were placed, where FBI Division Five runs its main
criminal operations, and which handles and controls the felon and money
ROUTINE COLLABORATION BETWEEN C.I.A. AND ORGANIZED CRIME
Documents obtained by this service in the course of research into the
Japanese gold buried in the Philippines (‘Yamashita’s gold’) PROVE direct
ongoing intense collaboration between the Central Intelligence Agency and
One diagram shows that there was (and remains to
this day) a division of labour, with the CIA (Intelligence Power) managing,
coordinating and manipulating the cooperation of the banks, Lloyds of London
and other domestic and foreign institutions, while the mafia is shown as
responsible for enforcement of the movement of the ‘recovered’ (i.e.,
re-stolen) gold to designated refineries and recipients.
There is no question but that this cooperative model applies across the
board, not just in the context of moving gold. In other words, the US
Intelligence Power works hand-in-glove with organized crime, the capital of
which is Chicago. We are now in a position to PROVE this with documents and
will do so in due course.
Which means that, supping with the Devil, the Intelligence Power is
irreparably criminalized; and since it has long since usurped the Executive
Branch (and the other two branches of the Federal Government, more or less),
the consequence is that the United States has a criminal government, is
driven by organized criminal priorities (Chicago), and is therefore a menace
Needless to say, this state of affairs could not be more perfect from the
perspective of the criminal intelligence organizations serving foreign
powers bent on the destruction of the United States, of which the 'Black'
pan-German DVD, and its nefarious French counterparts, are these days by far
the most insidious.
Nor can ANY reliance be placed upon Chinese
undertakings any longer, as we are led to believe that recent developments
demonstrate that, while currently sweet-talking the British Monarchical
Power, Chinese intelligence elements are simultaneously doing 'deals' with
Any party stupid enough to believe that 'deals' can be done with the head of
the serpent is in very urgent need of brain surgery.
George Bush Sr. and his
filthy apparat double-cross EVERYBODY.
It is a complete waste of time seeking
accommodating with this serpent, who, we are being told by transatlantic
phone, should be shot dead on sight immediately, as he is determined, like
Sampson, to ensure the ruination of the entire US and global financial
economies if he can't get his way.
AMERICANS TO RECOGNIZE THE PERILS OF C.I.A. CRIMINALITY
The forces of law and order, and of the Rule of Law and the Constitution,
have woken up to this catastrophe so late in the day that they are engaged
in a terrible struggle to decapitate the serpent before it destroys the
United States and the Rest of the World as it persists in seeking to retain
the upper hand.
As we have repeatedly seen, crushing the head of
the serpent is no easy task - not least because the serpent has beguiled
gullible, naïve and ill-informed foreigners, including some ancient European
powers which spawned the serpent in the first place (Britain, France,
The good news, as we have often pointed out, is that because the serpent’s
arrogance was such that it never anticipated the remotest possibility of
real resistance to the outpouring of its sewage, it has been caught
off-balance - and has never recovered from the shock of being faced down.
Recall the scripture that we have often cited in
the past [John, Chapter 18, verses 1-6]:
‘When Jesus had spoken these words,
he went forth with his disciples over the brook Cedron, where was a
garden, into the which he entered, and his disciples.
And Judas, which betrayed him, knew the place: for Jesus ofttimes
resorted thither with his disciples.
Judas then, having received a band of men and officers from the chief
priests and Pharisees, cometh thither with lanterns and torches and
Jesus, therefore, knowing all things that should come upon him,
went forth, and said unto them, Whom seek ye?
They answered him, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus saith unto
them, I am he. And Judas also, which betrayed him, stood with them.
As soon then as he had said unto them I am he, they went backward, and
fell to the ground’.
This is what happens when you stand up to these
people on the basis of solid faith.
They cannot believe that anyone could have the
temerity to stand in their way.
MEANWHILE THE SINISTER
‘OFFICE OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH’ IS STILL IN THE WORKS
As discussed in the report of 27th April, the ‘Restoring American Financial
Stability Act of 2010’, introduced by Josef Stalin’s grandson (Senator
Christopher Dodd) in the US Senate under the geo-masonic number S. 3217
(which, according to the esoteric Babylonian numerological drivel and
gobbledygook to which these serpents are bound, devolves to their ‘magic’
number 13 (3+2+1+7 = 13), provides for the establishment of the sinister
intelligence unit called the 'Office of Financial Research' within the US
Treasury - to which all key financial powers will in practice be delegated,
enabling the Treasury to continue sponsoring Fraudulent Finance operations
beneath the radar with selected corrupt counterparties, with no checks and
This all-powerful intelligence unit will be equipped with powers to destroy
any entity, whether overtly operating in the financial sector or not, and
whether based domestically or abroad, on an arbitrary basis, the blanket
cover being that the targeted entity will be deemed to be an actual or
prospective threat to the security of the United States (meaning Fraudulent
POWERS TO TAKE DOWN
ANY ENTITY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD
Since US corporations and financial enterprises, handling dollars, litter
the whole world, what this means in practice is that the decadent US dollar
will be propped up by this ‘hidden’ arbitrary power buried inside the
Any corporation handling US dollars could be
As the Office of Financial Research will have unlimited arbitrary
powers (more of which may be buried within the pages of the colossal draft
Senate Bill that have not been published), it will certainly be equipped
with all means necessary to destabilize and destroy entities that it
considers to be a threat to the security of the United States - which, in
translation, means: threatens the open-ended perpetration with the US
Treasury’s connivance, of Fraudulent Finance operations, including
securitization and the proliferation of derivatives ‘products’ based on
This explains why Paul Volcker has sacrificed
his reputation for integrity, as exposed above.
The US Treasury will therefore be able, with no checks and balances, to
implement by stealth an arbitrary pan-German-style ‘coup d’état by
On 7th May, The Wall Street Journal reported that, following pressure from
the Deputy Treasury Secretary, Neal Wolin, and the Chairman of the Federal
Reserve Board, Dr Ben Bernanke, an amendment or provision sponsored by
Senator Bernie Sanders which would have exposed certain US Federal Reserve
decision-making to Congressional auditors, and which would therefore have
largely repealed a 32-year-old law shielding Federal Reserve monetary policy
from Congressional auditors, was watered down.
Dr Bernanke wrote to the Senate Banking
Committee Chairman, Mr Dodd, stating that the Sanders measure would,
‘seriously threaten monetary policy
independence, increase inflation fears and market interest rates, and
damage economic stability and job creation’.
This is the standard Fed response to any attempt
to prize open its secrecy culture - which masks its illicit financial
transactions, creative accounting, operations with corrupted foreign central
banks via the Federal Reserve Inter Bank Settlement Fund, and secret deals
with the Treasury.
DESPERATE E.U. MEASURE
TO ‘SAVE THE (PAN-GERMAN) EURO’
INCOMPATIBLE WITH SAVING THE FAILING SATRAP
E.U. ‘MEMBER STATES’
Before we learned that $1.0 trillion had been stolen from the Gold Badge
Paymaster as described above, the following 'straight' analysis of the
European 'bailout' operation had been prepared for this report.
We leave this text intact, but you should bear
in mind the further, sinister dimension elaborated above, when considering
what follows. If you read this carefully, you will see that none of this is
actually inconsistent with what is reported higher up this analysis. All
that was agreed was an intention to 'create' a bail-out fund, begging the
question: how would this be financed.
Mention of the
International Monetary Fund is
also consistent, as the Fund suddenly expanded one of its facilities from
$50 Billion to $500 billion, as we reported earlier, in April, almost
certainly covering the placement of a counterparty $500 billion in IMF
accounts 'lifted' from the Settlements funds.
On the European stage, 16 ‘Member States’ of the European Union Collective
ended a 14-hour overnight session at the European Commission (a criminal
enterprise: see our
report dated 2nd May 2010) in Brussels by ‘agreeing’ to
'create' a fund worth some 750 billion Euros ($962 billion), incorporating
backing from the International Monetary Fund, to the satrap 'Member States'
facing financial instability, while the European Central Bank tore up its
rulebook, by stating that it will buy up official and private sector debt.
Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, the former Secretary of the Agitation
and Propaganda Department of the Young Communists at Marx-Lenin University,
led the chorus, backed by little José Manuel Barroso, President of the
European Commission, in proclaiming that this outcome confirmed that,
will do ANYTHING IT TAKES to support the Euro’.
LIABILITY POTENTIALLY IMPOSED
UPON BRITISH TAXPAYERS EVEN THOUGH BRITAIN IS
Now the Brown Government hastened to ‘ratify’ the
Lisbon Treaty, which
provides that decisions of this nature are taken by ‘Qualified Majority’,
meaning that no satrap ‘Member State’ can veto such decisions of the
Which in turn means that Britain, the Government
of which is financially strapped as never before in its history thanks to
the permissive cack-handed mismanagement of Gordon Brown, who clings to
office in Downing Street, will be called upon to help finance bail-outs for
‘Member States’ which discover that they cannot survive if bound to the
Collective Currency régime, which is ‘irrevocable’ under the 1992 Maastricht
Treaty - that is to say, they are stuck with the wrong rate of exchange
until the end of the solar system.
Therefore, on top of the financial burdens that will have to be borne by the
British taxpayer due to Brown’s irresponsible stewardship of the financial
economy for generations to come, money will have to be conjured up out of
nowhere to help bail out ‘Member States’ the economies of which are being
systematically destroyed by their Governments’ brainwashed idolatry of
membership of the EU Collective (EUdolatry).
Taken to its logical conclusion, this means that the British Government
(when one exists) attaches greater importance at all times to not offending
the EU sacred cow, than it does to the welfare of the people of Great
Britain. In other words, the interests of the British people are being
sacrificed on the altar of the corrupt god of the pan-Germans.
While the dense political UK Establishment and
the brainwashed Whitehall bureaucracy, wedded to EU membership because they
lack the smarts to distinguish between ‘cooperation’ and collectivization,
persist with their sterile internationalist agenda contrary to the wishes or
interests of the British people.
GOVERNMENT CORRECTLY REFUSED TO GO ALONG
To give the outgoing Labour Government its due,
Alistair Darling, the former
Chancellor of the Exchequer, refused to go along with any pledge to make
available a huge sum of money for the so-called EU bail-out plan.
This was perfectly correct, as the Chancellor,
like all his colleagues, was denuded of all powers and was merely in situ
pending a political resolution. But Europeans, led by the French, not
understanding this, or not wanting to bother to try to understand the true
situation, responded with an outpouring of vituperative hatred along the
'when you're in trouble, don't come begging to us. Rely on
Lovely people these EU 'colleagues'!
A piece of work by the name of Jean-Pierre Jouyet, Chairman of the French
Financial Services Authority, said:
'The English are very certainly going to
be targeted given the political difficulties they have. Help yourself and
heaven will help you. If you don't want to show solidarity to the
Eurozone, then let's see what happens to the United Kingdom'.
OUTCOME OF THE BRITISH
GENERAL ELECTION: TEMPORARY CHECK MATE
It is hard to imagine a recipe more likely to morph into a pretext for the
wholesale overthrow of the complacent and self-satisfied British political
and bureaucratic Establishment.
We have obtained a glimpse of the
instability to come following the inconclusive outcome of the General
Election held on 6th May 2010, following years of Brown's financial
mismanagement and parliamentary sleaze.
The Conservatives could have won the election with an overall majority had
they not long since decided to pretend that the issue of Britain’s hugely
expensive and sterile relationship with the European Union Collective,
involving the illegal remittance of Value Added Tax receipts to the European
Commission, a criminal enterprise given that its accounts have been
explicitly NOT approved by the Luxembourg-based Court of Auditors for the
past 14 years [report of 2nd May 2010], is a non-issue for public
consumption and electoral purposes.
Calculations based on votes cast prepared by the former MEP for South-East
England, Ashley Mote, have revealed as follows:
The Conservatives could have had a
comfortable working majority if they had made an unequivocal
commitment to a referendum on British membership of the EU.
The UKIP (United Kingdom Independence
Party) vote, favouring a much harsher policy towards Britain’s
sterile EU participation, would have collapsed and, while not every
one of the 25 seats listed below might have been delivered to the
'Conservatives', they would have emerged with a working majority of
In the following table of constituencies where
the 'Conservatives' came second, the first number shown represents the
winner's majority, and the second number shown represents the UKIP vote:
Bolton West 92 901
Derby North 613 829
Derbyshire North East 2445 2636
Dorset Mid 269 2109
Dudley North 649 3267
Great Grimsby 714 2043
Hampstead and Kilburn 42 408
Hull North 641 1358
Middlesbrough South 1677 1881
Morley and Outwood 1101 1506
Newcastle-Under-Lyme 1552 3491
Norwich South 310 1145
Oldham East 103 1720
Plymouth Moor 1588 3188
Rochdale 889 1999
Sheffield Central 165 652
Solihull 175 1200
Somerset and Frome 1817 1932
Southampton and Itchen 192 1928
St Austell and Newquay 1312 1757
St Ives South 1719 2560
Swansea West 504 716
Walsall North 990 1737
Walsall South 800 1711
Wirral South 531 1274
Additionally, the Conservatives should have won
Wells, which was lost to the Liberal Democrats with a majority of 800.
the UKIP vote was 1711; so including the promise of a referendum on
Britain’s continued sterile membership of the EU could have secured this
seat as well.
The Guardian reported on 8th May 2010 that ‘UKIP’s bid to beat the Speaker’
(who is traditionally unopposed by the main parties) in Buckingham, ended in
third place. Lessons for the Conservative right, there, perhaps, if they
think they can win by tacking to the extremes’.
But the data displayed above reveal that this assessment is the very reverse
of the truth. If the ‘Conservatives’ had accommodated the known preferences
of adherents of the United Kingdom Independence Party, they would have
achieved a comfortable working majority and would not have found themselves
on the edge of a deep abyss, as was the case as this report closed.
GORDON BROWN RESIGNS:
CAMERON GOES TO THE PALACE
After days of horse-trading, it transpired that the Labour Party could not
reach agreement with the Liberal Democrats. Faced with this situation, Mr. Gordon Brown
revised his intended resignation scenario this evening (11th May) and
As this update is being added, David Cameron has
entered Buckingham Palace and is seeing Her Majesty The Queen who is
appointing him Prime Minister. At the time of writing, no details of the
composition of the new Government are forthcoming.
For numerous observers,
this is an unexpected development, after many days during which the
impression had been formed that the British political impasse resembled
THE 'SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP' HE TRASHED EARLIER
As is well known, President Obama and some of his associates have gone out
of their way to trash and ridicule the so-called 'Special Relationship',
which is a myth designed to bamboozle the Brits into believing that the
United States is the United Kingdom's most reliable ally:
reality, as is being stripped down to bare metal 'as we speak', that the
United States remains in thrall to the criminalized Intelligence Power which
is controlled and corrupted by the decades-old pan-German penetration
alluded to in these reports.
Therefore, the news that President Obama called David Cameron as soon as he
stepped into Downing Street to congratulate him on becoming Prime Minister
and to pour praise over the so-called 'Special Relationship' went down like
a thousand lead balloons (as opposed to points of light) in certain London
quarters. What this man says usually diverges from what he does.
But what this does again illustrate is the
brazen gall that these controlled people have when they contradict
themselves, on the assumption that everybody has forgotten what they said
Notes and References:
(1): From our report dated
27th April 2010 [Archive]:
THE NSA/CIA/USAF HANDLER OF WANTA’S PROMOTER
As these exposures have unfolded, this Editor has been viciously
attacked from time to time by a notorious controlled US fabricator and
peddler of gross lies on behalf of Wanta, styling himself as an
‘intelligence expert’, named Thomas Heneghan.
We have reported
separately that Heneghan was authorized, by
Wanta, according to
documents we hold, to open one or more bank accounts for Marvelous
Investments, a vehicle reportedly used inter alia for the financing of
Thomas Heneghan’s disinformation handler is NSA/CIA/USAF Lieutenant
General Otis C. Johnson.
Concerning this proven criminalist operative
(Johnson), The SEC News Digest dated 21st May 1986 reported [page 1] as
Complaint Filed against Otis C. Johnson:
The Los Angeles Regional Office
[of the SEC] filed a complaint on May 6 in the US District Court for the
District of Colorado against Otis C. Johnson seeking a permanent
injunction and other equitable relief for violations of the antifraud
provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The complaint in question alleges that
Johnson defrauded N.D. Resources, Inc. (NDR) and its public
shareholders. Specifically, the complaint alleges that Johnson provided
NDR with a false geological report concerning certain mining claims and,
after NDR had entered into a joint venture with an accomplice of Johnson
in order to develop the claims, conspired to provide positive drilling
reports to NDR when, in fact, no drilling had been done.
The complaint further alleges that Johnson
sold approximately 240,353 shares of NDR common stock while the stock
price was inflated as a result of press releases issued by NDR
concerning the drilling reports.
[SEC v. Otis C. Johnson, DCO, Civil
Action NO 86-945 (LR-11105)].
The SEC News Digest dated 10th July 1989 reported [page 1] as follows:
Otis C. Johnson enjoined:
Angeles Regional Office announced that on June 22 Judge Lewis T.
Babcock, US District Court for the District of Colorado, signed an
Order of Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief against
Otis C. Johnson. The Order enjoins Johnson from future violations of
the antifraud provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Order directs Otis C. Johnson to disgorge his profits from sales of
N.D. Resources, Inc. (NDR), which disgorgement is waived based upon
the truth, accuracy and completeness of Johnson’s sworn
representations concerning his present inability to pay
disgorgement. Johnson consented to the Order without admitting or
denying the allegations of wrongdoing in the Complaint.
The Complaint alleges that Johnson defrauded NDR and its public
shareholders by, among other things, providing NDR with a false
geological report concerning certain mining claims and further
conspiring to provide positive drilling reports to the company when,
in fact, no drilling had been done, and by selling approximately
240,353 shares of the company’s stock while the stock price was
inflated as a result of press releases concerning the drilling
[SEC v. Otis C. Johnson, DCO, Civil Action No. 87-B-1693
The SEC News Digest dated 24th August 1992
reported [page 4] as follows:
Otis Johnson III Pleads Guilty:
Commission and Michael J. Norton, US Attorney for the District of
Colorado, announced that on July 20, 1992, Otis C. Johnson III
(Johnson) of Denver, Colorado, pleaded guilty to two criminal informations.
The first such information, filed May 20, 1992,
charged violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, conspiracy to commit mail
fraud and securities fraud in the purchase and sale of the
securities of Corporate Quest, Inc. (Corporate Quest).
information, filed July 20, 1992, charged violation of 18 U.S.C. §
371, conspiracy to commit mail fraud, wire fraud, and interstate
transportation of stolen property, in the purchase and sale of the
securities of United Financial Operations (United Financial).
Johnson admitted in his plea agreement that
in 1987 and 1988 [that] he participated in schemes to manipulate and
conduct fraudulent transactions in the securities of United Financial
and Corporate Quest.
Johnson also admitted that he and
co-conspirators conducted prearranged trades through controlled and
nominee accounts and paid for the trades in Corporate Quest’s securities
with worthless checks totaling approximately $313,000. As a result of
the co-conspirators’ activities, four brokerage firms lost approximately
Johnson is scheduled to be sentenced on September 21, 1992 at 9:00 a.m.
[U.S. v. Otis C. Johnson III, Criminal Action No. 92-CR-181, U.S.D.C.
(2): We reproduce herewith again, for
convenience AND EMPHASIS, the entire text revealing the Halliburton
scamming operations published in
our report dated 2nd May 2010, taken
originally from our report dated 26th May 2008 [Archive]:
EXPOSURE OF HALLIBURTON'S SCAMMING
26 MAY 2008
The following description of
the pit of corrupt degradation known as Halliburton is excerpted
from our report dated 28th May 2008 [ARCHIVE].
It reflects the
detailed inside knowledge of a fearless and serious-minded
[Note: The narrative as partially
reproduced here starts 'out of context'. However you can pick up
such context as is necessary to be in a position to comprehend the cess-pit of degradation that is being exposed, as you read into the
THE HALLIBURTON DRUG THUG AND THE STOLEN FEDERAL SALARIES SCAM
A former top CIA aide to Tenet and 30-year CIA veteran now reveals
the criminal background of 'HallCIA', the thug who yanked the
officer’s phone from the wall, ransacked the CIA operative’s office,
had the officer incarcerated in Halliburton’s own cell in the
basement of CIA headquarters and on a separate occasion punched
holes in the officer’s office wall, displayed episodes of extreme
violence and was observed by many to be high on drugs. He was also a
This was the criminal whom Cheney asserted to be a friend who could
never be arrested. This description leads into a summary of another
scam, whereby multiple salaries are paid into corrupt Halliburton
employees’ secret Swiss bank accounts:
'HallCIA' and the Head Programmer were moved back to Halliburton's
main office, just like the priests sexually abusing children are
moved to a different parish.
They were never prosecuted...
[Dressed in FBI uniform provided by Halliburton, the operative is
engaged in an FBI action to arrest this Halliburton thug]. He was
arrested for FIRST DEGREE MURDER OF AN FBI OFFICER. I had proof that
the FBI officer that he had murdered was a bona fide one with proper
papers and vetting in the FBI’s personnel archives. The FBI had
fingerprint and DNA evidence to prove that the Halliburton
programmer was the murderer.
They even had a trial and a conviction of the man for that murder.
He had feigned a fainting episode right before the reading of the
sentence and been taken to a hospital. He then assaulted the
hospital guard inside his room and left him unconscious in his bed.
Then he impersonated the guard using his
uniform. He later went to a lawyer who put in a motion to declare
the trial a mistrial on the grounds of a technicality: the defendant
had not been present at the reading of the sentence. The fact that
the criminal had committed a second nearly deadly assault the same
day in apparent good health, was omitted from that motion.
The FBI-clandestine CIA raid that I organized was on the private
flat of 'HallCIA'. It was not at his house where he lived with a
prostitute whom he pimped, according to a CIA file.
He did not keep
his contraband items there as there were too many unsavory people
coming through his house.
WHAT THE FBI FOUND IN THE CIA-HALLIBURTON DRUG THUG'S APARTMENT
At the flat the FBI confiscated drugs in pusher quantities and also
illegal weapons, including some unregistered machine guns,
explosives and hand-held artillery that could blow big holes through
a wall for illegal entry.
He had one bedroom devoted just to
weapons, with shelves devoted to about half-kilo packages of drugs.
It was equipped with a padlock. CIA top secret documents were strewn
all over the bed, dresser and floor of the master bedroom.
It looked like a hurricane had hit the bedroom even before we
arrived. The padlock was broken on the door to the weapons and drug
room and the door was open when we arrived. But all the drugs were
still neatly on the shelves. The flat may have been raided by
Russian intelligence before we arrived, leaving the CIA documents
behind as cover-up after copying them.
The FBI collected fingerprints and I collected the CIA documents.
After the raid I returned to the FBI station and filled in the
appropriate forms to write a FBI report up on the raid. As I was
doing so, the two FBI officers who I had spoken with two days before
walked by the desk I was using. They did a double take seeing me in
the FBI uniform....
I told them that I had just tested FBI
vetting and security procedures for a report I was writing for the
CIA. I also explained to them that I had just successfully
impersonated an FBI official to the extent of going on a raid with
them, and not one had yet asked for my name or run it through a
background check. I showed them the CIA top-secret documents the
raid had netted and they laughed at the ruse I had played on the
They were not laughing, however, when I explained how I had gotten
that FBI uniform and signed the papers. They checked on their
computers; I was not yet registered on the records of the FBI.
I asked them to arrest all of the appropriate Halliburton people
involved in that scam. They called the Director of the FBI and I
also spoke to him. He refused to authorize the arrests.
He told me: ‘Write up your report and let me read it first'. I
offered to drive over immediately with the evidence. He refused to
make any time to see me. I immediately faxed him a short report and
enough evidence to warrant the arrests. Nothing happened.
MULTIPLE SALARIES PAID INTO SWISS BANK ACCOUNTS
But the next day when the local FBI checked my name again, they
called me to let me know that I was officially part of the FBI now
per their computer. I promptly sent in a full report to the FBI, the
CIA, and the Pentagon on this scam to sign up Halliburton employees
as their officers and have the US taxpayer pay their salaries.
Just like Halliburton over-billed, some
Halliburton employees were collecting THREE US Government salaries;
one from the Pentagon, one from the FBI, and one from the CIA. I
wrote in my report that I had signed up in all three places via
Halliburton’s scam to see how long it would be before those scams
I put on the three forms, separate Swiss bank accounts. The point
was to use the accounts as evidence of Halliburton corruption when
those cases came to trial; I have not touched a cent of that money.
The Directors of the FBI, the CIA, and the Chief of the JCS that I
sent those reports to did not implement my list of recommendations;
one of them was to shut down all of those public salaries going to
Halliburton employees. At least, they had not been implemented as of
about Summer 2004 when I last checked those accounts.
Another recommendation was to make sure that everyone in those
agencies is properly vetted and drug tested as per that agency’s
usual security measures. Because I was concerned that my clear
recommendations would not be acted upon, I despatched copies of
those letters, the forms that I had signed, and the numbers of the
Swiss bank accounts to the GAO. In my covering letter to the GAO I
told them that I had given them the authority to check the balances
in those accounts by written authorization to the Swiss bank.
I had hoped that seeing US taxpayer’s money streaming into those
accounts would give them an incentive to prosecute those cases
promptly. Since the banks were not in the United States, I doubt
that coercion applied to the bankers will erase those accounts, but
I could be wrong. Since I had long been a covert CIA person, those
communications with officials and the banks were under aliases.
The GAO however has all of the proper
information to check those accounts again and to prosecute these
cases. I myself no longer remember any of the aliases and account
numbers, so I couldn’t access that money even if I wanted to. I
never intended to use that money at all, so I did not record those
aliases and numbers into my personal effects.
In 2004 when I checked the accounts, I did so from within the CIA by
pulling up the report that I had written to the DCI. I have no way
to check those accounts now so I do not know whether that scam, as
evidenced by a single person’s accounts, has been stopped. When I
checked in 2004, two years had already passed.
The US taxpayer had paid [as follows]:
via the CIA, about $80,000.00 each year, for a total of about
$160,000.00; via the FBI, about $50,000.00 each year, for a total of
$100,000.00; and via the Pentagon, about $80,000.00 each year for a
total of about $160,000.00, or roughly $420,000.00 total into those
three Swiss accounts...
I also checked on whether Halliburton continued paying those
employees if it signed them up for a Federal salary. The answer was
no, except for rare exceptions. 'HallCIA' had continued receiving a
Halliburton salary while getting one at the CIA, but the Head
Programmer had not.
When I checked in 2004 the number of Halliburton employees getting a
CIA salary was over 200, the number receiving an FBI salary was over
400, and the number of Halliburton employees receiving a Pentagon
salary, was over 300. Suppose that the total for that is about 1,000
salaries each at, say, $50,000 a year.
That would mean that the US taxpayer was
being bilked (by Cheney) of $50 million a year of fraudulent
salaries. Over the eight years that this Cheney has been in the Vice
President’s office, that could easily add up to $400 million in
savings for Halliburton in not having had to pay salaries. No wonder
it was so easy to get that FBI uniform and salary sent out to me by
talking to a Halliburton VP. Other Halliburton programmers had
complained to me that they took a ‘cut in pay’ to work at the CIA
They said that ‘the takings are good’,
and ‘Halliburton fences the items for us in a 50-50 split’.
HALLIBURTON’S THIEVES INSIDE THE CIA AND THE INEVITABLE
When I heard that Halliburton’s people were stealing from inside the
halls of the CIA, loud alarm
bells went off inside my head. The items inside the CIA which were
easiest to carry out were of course its documents.
And any computer that one stole inside the CIA was likely to have
top-secret information on it, in spades. It was a
counterintelligence person’s nightmare, and now it was mine. The
fact that the Head of the Halliburton section offices at the CIA had
just sold the CIA’s communication satellite encryption security
codes to Moscow burned in my mind.
The Russians had paid him $20,000 for that betrayal.
He had no clue as to their black market value. It made me worry that
the Russians and the Chinese could buy every secret inside the CIA
for a price that they could afford. More than one Halliburton person
inside the CIA had admitted to me that they were stealing to make up
for their cut in pay. Halliburton had switched them to Federal
salaries, making the CIA pick up the tab [see above].
One Halliburton person at the CIA had told me that they were all
stealing enough to make up for that cut in pay. [They were ONLY in
it for the money: taking their cue from Cheney and Bush: Ed].
Therefore, the first thing I did was to find out what those 40-odd
people used to earn at Halliburton. I had the CIA’s accounting
office print out for me what the CIA was now paying them. My mouth
then dropped open in shock. Each one of them would have to steal
over $10,000 worth of CIA secrets or goods a year to break even.
In some cases the cut in pay was much
higher. One man took a $50,000 a year cut in pay when he switched to
the Federal salary. At the average $23,000 cut in pay, the 40
workers together had sustained a $920,000 cut in pay. I had been
told that Halliburton was fencing the goods in a 50%-50% split. So,
about 2 million dollars’ worth of good at black market prices would
be stolen from the CIA, if they actually made up their lost salaries
[There followed a summary of the notorious Aldrich Ames, Clyde
Conrad, Larry Wu-Tai Chin, John Anthony Walker, and Robert Hanssen
espionage cases, omitted here]
On February 22, 1994, Ames and his wife were formally charged by the
United States Department of Justice with spying for the Soviet Union
and Russia. Mr Ames could have faced the death penalty, since his
betrayal had resulted in CIA ‘assets’ being killed.
However, he received a sentence of life
imprisonment, and his wife received only a five-year prison sentence
for her conspiracy to commit espionage and tax evasion as part of a
plea bargain by Ames.
TENET AND CHENEY REFUSED TO ADDRESS THESE ISSUES
I walked down to the office a very high-ranking CIA analyst, about
third in the hierarchy in that department, a man I trusted. People
advance inside the CIA by one of two means normally, being very good
at what they do or being very good at lying to please those above
them. The heads of each section were often in the latter category,
as a general rule.
I asked him how many secrets the
Russians could buy for $2 million a year, if they had 40 moles able
to walk the halls of the CIA. In the posing of the question I
explained that the hypothetical moles would be assumed to be
'efficient' criminals without formal espionage training. I asked him
what effect that would have on national security. He asked me if
this was a conversational gambit or a request for a formal report to
answer my question. I thought about it a moment and then said the
That meant that I had to go get a signature on a form. By submitting
to Mr Tenet new requests for 10 separate reports on a wide variety
of important topics, I quickly brought the analyst the signed form
that he needed. He whistled in surprise when he reviewed the
assignment given to him there in black and white.
Then he asked me,
'Is this about the Privatized
Employees’ invasion of the CIA?' I said yes.
‘I have been urging Tenet to let us
study that risk for months. No go. How did you get this when I
I explained to him my method and also
that the Head of the Halliburton group had just sold the CIA’s
Communication Satellite Encryption Security Codes to the Russians.
He hadn’t heard that [because] Tenet had put a lid on it even within
the CIA. I promised to show him the proof. I came back and gave him
and a few of his top staff an hour long briefing on what I had
learned. One man was actually in tears as I finished.
Another said: ‘This marks the end of US national security’. Another
said, 'No. US honor died already and no memo was sent announcing its
I asked them what information they needed to make a proper
assessment. They said that it would help them if I could find out
how much the 40 people were actually making off their thefts inside
the CIA, and a list of what they were stealing. I came back the next
day with the list of how much each one had been paid by Halliburton
in ‘bonuses’, which was the code word for fenced items, and what
each ‘bonus’ was for.
That list of what each bonus was for was
like what the programmers really did in morphing an appliance rack
into a bread slice rack. It was not a specifically accurate
description but it related to the item in a fairly straightforward
CHENEY WAS INFORMED IN A RECORDED PHONE CALL
I showed the list to Tenet and tried to brief him on how dangerous
He did not want to hear. Tenet had not followed my recommendations,
which would have stopped the thefts. And he did not want further
reasons why he should do so... I called Cheney and begged him to
send a memo over to Halliburton setting up a program to [address
these extremely serious issues].
I even faxed him a memo so that all he
had to do was sign to get that to happen. He did not deny that
Halliburton was selling items stolen from the CIA. He did not deny
that he had the power to impose the necessary changes at Halliburton
by sending the memo. He did not deny that he had the power to order
Tenet to institute effective measures to stem the tide of the
As the phone recording of that call shows, I kept briefing him on
the problem while he kept saying that he refused to discuss the
matter with me.
I sent a copy of that call over to the GAO because it showed that I
had in fact managed to inform Vice President Cheney of the
seriousness of the thefts. In that call [to Cheney] I cited that the
likely consequences were the shredding of US national security and
the wholly unnecessary deaths of its covert personnel.
I also set up a surveillance operation
behind Cheney’s and Tenet’s back to actually inspect each item that
Halliburton fenced from the CIA.
COUNTERINTELLIGENCE OPERATION AGAINST TENET AND CHENEY BACKFIRES
That is, I had an ex-CIA operative with counter-intelligence
experience whom I trusted, apply to Halliburton. I instructed him to
offer to 'help them fence their CIA goods and get higher prices for
them'. Call him Alan for short.
A Halliburton VP, the same one who sent
me the FBI uniform, sent me a 'thank you' letter for referring Alan
to them. He no doubt believed that I was corrupt and making a
kickback. It was to my advantage to foster that image of myself
without it actually being true. In my position it was best if
everything I did could be interpreted as corrupt at the same time
that I was collecting the evidence for prosecution.
That operative, Alan, ended up terribly overworked in no time. The
analysts and I had been off by a factor of THREE in the amount that
was routinely being stolen by Halliburton from the CIA.
We did not find that out until the Halliburton people realized that
they could get more money by making sure that Alan sold the goods
for them. That meant Alan had to sell them at on average much higher
than twice what they could get for them themselves, even by selling
directly to the Russians.
That was not as hard as it would have
been with regular stolen goods; the Halliburton people did not know
their true worth on the black market. Alan could make a better
profit selling a document to a rich government such as France, which
would have been very bad in the hands of the poorer Chinese or
Russians. Before that, Halliburton had sold mainly to the Russians.
[Editor: Further allegation that
Halliburton has sold CIA secrets to the Russians].
The French were very helpful to us in keeping many things out of the
hands of the Russians. They had wised up quickly as to our problem
and how to assist us. The United Kingdom was less helpful because
they could get that same information by merely filing a request for
The French were not as tight into the CIA, though they were still US
allies. We needed top dollar for the stolen items because we had to
make up for the fact that we were not selling off all of the items
due to their national security risk.
We were hiding the fact from
Halliburton’s management that we were really sending the items back
to the CIA.
OVER 50% OF HALLIBURTON SALES BREACHED NATIONAL SECURITY
We could not send computers back, as it was impossible to ensure
that the Russians etc. had not altered them in the meantime. Those
had to be scrubbed clean using a special erasing procedure.
But it was possible to send back
documents. We had initially thought that it would be only 10% of the
items that had to be vetoed on national security grounds. But as we
got a better understanding of what was being sold via Halliburton,
that figure went up to a little over 50%
[Editor: More damning allegations against Halliburton as a
continuing threat to US national security. George W. Bush authorized
this grotesque corruption and treachery via his Executive Orders].
[The high-level operative and source for this information left the
CIA for Canada in 2002].
Subsequently, operatives working inside the CIA to address this
catastrophic situation] demanded that Tenet should lock the unvetted
people out of the building.
In the process of showing how serious the security violations were,
they revealed the oversight (or counterintelligence) operation
against Tenet and Cheney themselves. That ended up revealing that
they were recovering about 50% of the items and about 30% of their
black market worth. Tenet informed Cheney of that fact, and Cheney
ordered an end to the oversight.
I later sent copies of the relevant telephone calls revealing all
this to the GAO.
The Russians and Mossad had a complete
set of White House calls, including of [calls concerning what was]
for sale. The CIA also had a fairly complete set. When I was forced
back into the CIA in October 2003 from Canada with threats and
worse, I heard about the troubles that the oversight people had
suffered over the intervening 16 months. They had been unable to
perform oversight for four months.
During that time Halliburton had fired their Private Eyes, the
ex-CIA operatives that they had there. Instead, Halliburton had
hired its own experts on Black Market Intelligence Pricing and had
sold all of the stolen items without regard to US national security.
I then dispatched over to the GAO about a dozen phone conversations
by Halliburton’s high officials demonstrating their reckless
disregard for national security and the lives of covert operatives.
[Therefore, this information is all
available for the Congressional Committee to access immediately:
But it now gets much, much worse....
THEFTS OF CIA COMPUTERS LEADING TO AN UNIMAGINABLE CATASTROPHE
The next part of the narrative briefing leads into a description of
the most ghastly consequences, for which Vice President Richard B.
Cheney is clearly indicated by the narrative to be responsible,
given his Luciferian greed for ‘profit’ which of course is on its
own an impeachable offence:
It was only after a [hitherto unreported: Ed.] colossal national
security catastrophe that the [CIA operatives who had carried on
trying to get results] managed to get Tenet to insist that
Halliburton rehire their ex-CIA ‘Private Eyes’. The oversight people
briefed me on [the catastrophe] as soon as I returned.
The first day I came back to the CIA’s
Headquarters, they kept me up all night telling me about it. I cried
many times that night for my country and for the harm that had been
done to her. I cried for the people who had died so brutally and
Many, many more intelligence professionals lost their lives as a
consequence of Cheney’s selling secrets than lost their lives
because of the traitorous behavior of Aldrich Ames. Ames is serving
a life sentence for what he did. Cheney’s Halliburton people were
still working at the CIA and were still stealing there because of
Cheney’s protection of them. They were still walking inside the
halls of the CIA every day and going into its offices to ‘have a
It was such an egregious violation of national security that some
oversight members quit the CIA. Others said to me: ‘Why should we
look like criminals who are enabling this theft’? ‘We are not making
a cent off it... Yet we have been threatened by Tenet that we will
be put in prison because we know of the thefts and hence must be
guilty of them... We are being treated like criminals because we are
trying to stop the most dangerous of these sales’.
[Editor: Gross abuse by Tenet of the Misprision of Felony Statute].
I later collected a memo from Cheney to Tenet which stated that the
oversight of the sales by the CIA was cutting into profits and had
to be stopped. It recommended imprisoning all of those in the CIA
suspected of being a bottleneck in [the raking in of] US corporate
Tenet prohibited the oversight within a
week of receiving that memo.
The GAO has a copy of the memo and also
of the memo that Tenet sent out threatening imprisonment if anyone
was discovered to have decreased US corporate profits. They also
have the later memorandum that Mr Tenet sent, which threatened
imprisonment if anyone knew about stolen goods and did not report it
to the designated official.
Those who had reported thefts to that official had been fired soon
Thieves do not report stolen goods; people with integrity do, until
it is clear that it is pointless and dangerous to do so. I also sent
the GAO the document suggesting this ruse of a new designated
official as a way to stop the oversight.
That designated official never
prosecuted a case of theft against a Halliburton person. He came
He had in fact been recommended for the job by 'HallCIA'
to Cheney, who then recommended him for the job. I sent over to the
GAO a tape of the phone conversation between 'HallCIA' and Cheney.
On it. 'HallCIA' says that the man that
he is recommending will stop the losses of revenues 'from our CIA
HALLIBURTON CROOK BRAGGED ABOUT LUCRATIVE SALE TO THE RUSSIANS
Later he bragged about one of his sales to Russia of ‘one of our CIA
products’, and says, 'too bad we can’t make more of them’. It was
clear that he was referring to the stolen goods that Halliburton
stole from the CIA, not products that Halliburton made and sold to
The designated official was not vetted
by the CIA. He was stealing from the CIA while working out of the
Halliburton offices. I sent to the GAO a signed statement from a CIA
security guard who caught him carrying a computer of the CIA’s out
of the front door. That man could have employed the back door out of
their offices manned only by Halliburton’s guards. He was so used to
stealing from the CIA and getting away with it that he forgot, and
used the front door.
That is what he told the guard: 'I forgot... Give me a hand and
we’ll take it out the back door’. The Halliburton guards did just
that. They helped the Halliburton thieves load CIA computers into
their private cars. I sent the GAO several CIA security camera clips
of that happening.
The CIA had massive amounts of security camera data showing that
[activity]. The CIA security people were afraid to report the thefts
that they saw, because they did not want to lose their jobs without
it even cleaning up the problem.
By the time I returned to the CIA, 16
people had lost their jobs due to reporting thefts to the designated
official that Tenet’s memo had directed them to use. No one at the
CIA knew about the item sold during the blackout that caused the
national security catastrophe, until after the catastrophe happened.
[Details of this national security
catastrophe, unfortunately containing graphic and disturbing
language, now follow].
THE CATASTROPHE, COURTESY OF THE CORRUPTION OF TENET, CHENEY AND
The first sign of that Catastrophe [with a capital C: Ed] was a dead
body lying on a sidewalk in a foreign city.
The body had been the teenage daughter
of a CIA officer. The body was no longer recognizable, even by her
father. The body was identified definitively by dental records. Her
face had been peeled off in small strips. The forensic evidence
revealed that she was still able to bleed and struggle during most
of the time that was done to her.
The next sign of the Catastrophe was another unrecognizable body.
This time, of a 6-year-old boy of a US diplomat. The injuries were
the same. The CIA concluded that the murderer was the same man. The
next sign was an 11-year-old child of a US school teacher in Africa.
She was divorced and her husband had once worked for the US State
Department. Perhaps he had been CIA under diplomatic cover, but the
CIA refused to comment.
I saw the photographs of the dead bodies. They were too horrible for
Could it be that I was recalled to the CIA against my will in
order to get my special operational skills to track down the
villain? The day I got back to the CIA, the first thing Tenet did
was hand me these pictures and ask me to find The Killer. He had
given me the pictures of 23 victims who had all died the same way.
All of them were children of people who
could have been in the CIA.
About 22 of them did have a known parent
or guardian in the CIA.
DEATHS DUE TO THE STEALING OF A CIA COMPUTER
What he failed to tell me, or give me the photos for, for was the
over 100 adults that had been killed using the exact same modus
operandi. One of them was in the CIA’s morgue at that moment
[Editor: did you know that the CIA has its own morgue? I didn’t]...
The item that was stolen from the CIA
that was responsible for those deaths was a computer. That computer
had not gone through the hands of one of the ex-CIA operatives. Its
contents not been thoroughly erased.
It took work and time to do that; the disc had to be erased and
written over 50 times. Halliburton’s bosses did not care about
national security or the risk to the CIA's covert operatives, if
they were exposed... I was able to prove that it was the same
computer. It still had the CIA’s personnel files on it and many of
the victims had been selectively deleted from where they should have
been in that list.
When I then compared that file to the
CIA's current personnel file, the comparison program marked those
deletions in red. The selective deletions showed that the owner of
the computer was getting tipped off by someone high up in the
investigation of the deaths inside the CIA.
The US Administration managed to suppress the news of these murders
almost completely, after its ties to the computer started showing up
in the CIA’s internal investigations. No-one in the media had
connected the isolated cases across the globe [another gross failure
by the incompetent and controlled Fourth Estate, which has
intelligence cadres sitting in its press rooms: Ed.].
The motivation of the deletions was obviously to try to cover-up the
guilt of the owner’s role in those murders. There were about 86
deletions in a file of thousands of names.
Each deletion was a
victim, as already known by the CIA up to a certain date about two
ENTER THE 'DARK LORDS': DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO BUSH
No victim that the CIA had on its investigation list by that point
had failed to be deleted on that stolen computer.
The odds of that
happening by chance alone was practically speaking, exactly zero. In
addition, I later obtained evidence that firmly tied the secondary
ownership of that same computer to those who committed the actual
tortures and murders.
There was many more than one murderer.
What they had in common was membership in a kind of paramilitary,
quasi-religious cult. The members of that paramilitary cult had a
group commitment to kill a person once a month. The Mafia usually
only requires its members to kill once to get into it.
This satanic group required their
members to kill once a month in order to remain in good standing in
[Note: The Editor
of this service received, between February and mid-May 2008, a large
number of evil, unsolicited phone calls from a contrived, deep
demonic ‘voice’ referencing ‘the Great Dark Lords’. This harassment
[referenced in our report dated 27th April 2010, as the stupid
harassment resumed: we have identified the operative concerned as
Wanta] continued until shortly after we reported the matter to the
head of the US Anti-Terrorism Task Force and also, separately, to
law enforcement personnel in contact with the Editor’s own contacts,
whereupon they ceased. We have voice recordings of almost all these
Considered in the context of what follows, it would appear that
these calls represented threats: one of these was quite specific,
along the lines of ‘we have the means of dealing with you'. Given
the appearance of the ‘Dark Lords’ in this ‘Cheney’ context, it is
likely that the Unterreichsführer’s apparat will indeed, as we
suspected, have been responsible for these multiple telephone
threats and harassment calls.
It comes as NO SURPRISE whatsoever to the Editor that the veteran
CIA investigator came across this ‘Black’ dimension. The harassment
calls to the Editor were also interspersed with threatening emails.
The content of one of these, containing a very grave threat, was
conveyed immediately as referenced above, with the consequence that
(at the date of this posting) the harassment ceased].
A Manual on 'How to Please the Lords of Darkness’ had been published
by a member of that cult.
It recommended that the best way to do
it was to torture people to death using the modus operandi that I
have indicated above. That Manual had been distributed by the owner
of the aforementioned computer with that CIA Personnel file
suggested as the targets.
The man who bought the computer was indeed
a paramilitary type, with a large collection of weapons, many of
them unregistered... He was identified as a fundraiser for Bush.
The literature of the group showed upside-down crosses as an emblem
[satanic symbolism: Ed.]. The reason that others in the CIA had not
tracked him down and had failed to pin the instigating of the
murders on him, was political. Like 'HallCIA', and the Head
Programmer from our earlier cases, he was well protected. It was not
that CIA investigators had not suspected him.
It was that they did not know what to do
with their suspicions and even their evidence after they got it.
I was the booby prize winner: the fool at the CIA who had before
been willing to buck the silence at great risk to myself. There was
precedence for giving me a job like this. At one point, a CIA
officer had sold a list of MI6 officers to the KGB during the Cold
The KBG had started killing them off. I was given the job to
stop them from continuing. And they had stopped: whether or not it
was due to my efforts, was a matter of hot debate within the CIA.
But some people credited me with having had some influence in the
The individual who bought that computer was apparently a friend of
Cheney and Bush; they had invited him to the White House. They had
been present when he picked it out among a number of other CIA
stolen computers, paying cash, which Cheney had put in his pocket.
‘CHENEY & BUSH TOOK THE MONEY FOR THE COMPUTERS USED FOR THE
I found the White House Security camera footage of that event. The
GAO has a copy of it. The payment is shown on the video. The man
took hundred dollar bill(s) out of his pocket and handed that to
Bush hesitated and then handed the money
to Cheney. The footage of that computer being carried out of the
room by a guard follows about 20 minutes later. The room had about
20 computers from the CIA in it, to start with. [They were all
neatly laid out, as at a corporate sales demonstration, for buyers
to examine, test, select, and pay for: only cash was accepted: Ed.].
The security camera tape shows Bush Jr. and Mr Cheney repeatedly
coming into the room with a prospective buyer and taking cash in
varying amounts. That continued until all the computers were gone.
Some prospective buyers remained in the room for over an hour
exploring the contents of the stolen CIA computers, before deciding
on a purchase.
I checked with the CIA and found that no
CIA vetting of those buyers had occurred. Most did not have security
clearances. Some of them had prior felony convictions and had been
allowed into the White House ‘on orders from above’. The sale was
‘by invitation only’, with Bush and Cheney controlling the
The earlier tape shows Cheney directing Halliburton employees in
where to set the computers up. Much care and time was taken to plug
them in and connect them to monitors, mice, keyboards, and to
arrange the room nicely with a mouse pad under each mouse. The GAO
has a copy of that tape too.
The manual on how to torture people (in
the manner described) and the file of CIA Personnel was sent
overseas and domestically through the mail whenever a buyer
purchased a snuff film from that man. His poorly kept records showed
that he had mailed out at least 2,000 such CDs with the Manual on
'How to please the Lords of Darkness'.
His records omitted the addresses that he sent them to in about 50%
of the cases where he marked payment received and product and
Thirty of the murders had been solved
already by local foreign authorities by the time I was given the
case. Of those, the 'How-to' CD was found in 28 of them. Presumably
it had been overlooked in the other two, or the wrong party may have
been charged, or the 'How-to' thrown out by the 'Black' criminal
Unfortunately, the murders had continued after those arrests.
BUSH AND CHENEY RESPONSIBLE FOR 168 CIA DEATHS, COVERED UP
At least 168 CIA officers and their family members were brutally
tortured to death as a direct result of this cynical corruption run
by Bush and Cheney.
The CIA [systematically] covered it all up and
pretended that it never happened on Tenet’s orders.
The notorious traitor Aldrich Ames had
not sent out instructions to torture and kill anyone. He had sold
ONE copy of a list of CIA operatives in one country to one buyer. He
is languishing in prison for life.
[The perpetrator identified here] sent out over 2,000 copies of all
the names and addresses of the CIA officers and their families in
every country. He had sent them out with hate propaganda and incited
others to kill them. He had sent this [Nazi filth] to people who
were known murderers who had a commitment to kill again.
And he had sent it out as a challenge:
are you man enough to kill a CIA person? His group offered ‘Advanced
Membership Privileges’ to anyone who succeeded.
It was very curious that someone close and high up in the
investigations at the CIA was tipping him off, since he was
targeting CIA officers. I was able to supply the GAO with the
evidence as to who was doing it. This person was getting calls and
faxes directly from Cheney and Tenet. Tenet’s faxes included the
names of the victims to date.
He was being assisted in his cover-up at
a very high US level. I investigated whether the Russians or another
foreign group had put him up to this, as his methods seemed too
effective to be that of an individual’ alone.
HALLIBURTON LINKED TO THESE MURDERS OF CIA PERSONNEL
I found no such evidence of a foreign government or its operatives
being behind it [but] I found many ties to US underworld
Most of the ties, however, were directly to
According to Halliburton’s records which
I sent the GAO, [the perpetrator of these incitements to murder CIA
personnel] had headed one of their subsidiaries before it went
CIA INVESTIGATOR TOLD TO 'BACK OFF, OR ELSE'
When I looked up that old corporation I
did not find a building on the aerial to correspond to the address.
That subsidiary had been selling intelligence and paramilitary gear.
It had specialized in recruiting
mercenaries worldwide. It made me wonder if those killing the CIA
had done so, as a kind of recruitment test; those getting away with
it and being able to prove it, getting the job. I started looking
into whether he was on Halliburton’s books as CEO of a new
subsidiary. Just as soon as I started that investigation, Cheney
called and told me to ‘back off or else’.
I asked him what the ‘else’ referred to, because it certainly
sounded like a death threat to me. He hung up on me. Then he called
me back about 10 minutes later and offered to set up a face-to-face
meeting with that computer owner. I agreed and asked at once for a
time and a place.
He hung up: apparently his offer was just to
threaten me that he would [impose] that man on me. I sent copies of
those calls to the GAO also. They should still have them.
The Halliburton mercenary recruiter [who
incited the murders] was never prosecuted. Cheney and Bush would not
BIO-FEEDBACK EQUIPMENT STOLEN BY HALLIBURTON FOR THE RUSSIANS
In about May 2002, a Halliburton person at the CIA had stolen an
expensive piece of equipment. It was an ultra-sophisticated CIA
bio-feedback machine that was worth over $5 million.
It had required hundreds of millions of dollars of R & D money for
the CIA to develop it. It was custom-made only for the CIA. Its only
purpose was to train operatives how to pass a lie detector test. It
was only used when they were to be sent on extremely dangerous
missions to places like Russia. And it was only used in very
There was a high risk that Russian intelligence would figure out how
to overcome that training, if they interrogated about five
operatives who had used it.
That is, if they realized that those 5
had been trained in that fashion. Thus it was TOP SECRET and its
manual was also top secret at the time. Loss of that machine and its
Manual was the same as potentially losing every secret a given CIA
official had in his or her mind when they were in Russia. The head
of the CIA station in Russia had been trained on that machine for
The effect of the training was to give the user control over their
automatic nervous system. That meant that they could stop their
fear, their sweating, their heart rate increase etc. in response to
In addition to those obvious advantages in an
interrogation situation, it had a big psychological benefit. It gave
those who had used it confidence that they could pass a lie detector
test. Thus, they were as if ‘bullet proofed' against threats and lie
Although the signal-to-noise ratio relating to information obtained
under torture is so low as to be unusable, that is not true in a
‘friendly’ interrogation. The British had admirably demonstrated the
effectiveness of 'friendly interrogations' in WWII. An operative who
had fear or fear of a lie detector test was more likely to ‘tell
all’ in a ‘friendly interrogation’ because of underlying anxiety.
I did not find out about that theft
until the next day. I then learned from a Halliburton person that it
had been stolen and was en route to the Russian Embassy to be sold
to them. I was absolutely horrified by the national security
implications of that. I rushed up to Tenet’s office to tell him. He
Cheney had called him and asked him what it was and what it was
worth to the Russians. This was after I had set up the system for
things to go through Alan so that the oversight committee could
intervene to stop the worst violations of national security.
But the thief was a personal friend of Cheney’s and had taken the
item straight to the White House to ask him if he wanted to buy it.
Cheney had paid him $50,000 for it, he informed me.
The copy of the telephone call that I
sent to the GAO between Tenet and Cheney showed that Mr Cheney had
considered keeping it, so that he could pass lie detector tests.
CHENEY THREATENS TO KILL THE VETERAN CIA OPERATIVE PERSONALLY
They had discussed it and Tenet had promised to find out more about
it, how it worked, and how much it was ‘worth outside of the CIA’.
He had called him back and told him a
figure of $1.2 million. Cheney asked him to find out what was his
risk of needing the machine himself. Tenet called him back and said
that CIA analysts judged his risk to be about 4%.
In front of Tenet
with his phone on speaker, I called Cheney and demanded its return.
He laughed and said,
‘What’s the big deal? It can only be used 5
times total and it has already been used once. We should sell it
while it still has value before those 5 times are up’.
absolutely no understanding of intelligence matters.
It was not 5
uses of the machine: it was 5 times a CIA person trained using that
machine was interrogated by the Russians. It could be 20 years'
worth of use to prevent the loss of security codes, national
secrets, and how a CIA station was operating.
I explained it all quite carefully as Cheney is not a technically
minded person. I even asked him questions to make certain that he
had understood what I said correctly
[Editor: This interesting
comment suggests that Cheney is actually not that bright, which may
also be judged to be the case, given his behavior over the
Settlements and his repeated thefts of gigantic sums of money. It may be that he progressed to these
much larger thefts after getting away with multiple lesser thefts of
which examples have been given in this narrative].
Cheney then said:
‘Well, what difference does it make since there are remote viewers
like you in Russia who can steal the secrets anyway?’
I then explained that
remote viewers were not 100% accurate and that
intelligence agencies always had to verify what they said using hard
Lie detector tests are not 100% accurate either, but they add
some signal-to-noise benefit. Mr Cheney replied that torture was
generally worthless in getting information.
[Editor: Amazing! Was
not Cheney reported to be adamant that torture MUST be used to
extract intelligence from terrorists and from prisoners in US hell
holes like Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib?].
That was true. But it was still wrong to
sell the Russians the CIA’s very best and most advanced equipment to
deter loss of information under interrogation. ‘Friendly
interrogations’ do yield valid intelligence.
When I pointed that out, Cheney said that the machine had already
been sold to the Russians and that I was too late. I told him that I
would figure out some way of prosecuting him, if he ever did that
He laughed and said,
‘You haven’t got a chance’.
I told him
that I would try.
Cheney then said:
‘I will kill you myself, if you ever get close to
As we have said before, Cheney is what
Malachi Martin would have
called 'perfectly possessed'.
RUSSIA TREATED AS 'THE ENEMY' THROUGHOUT: RAPPROCHEMENT IS
You will have noticed that during the timeframe of this narrative
[2002-2005-ish], Russia is considered in this dialogue to be an
enemy, just as was the case during the overt Cold War.
This reflects the fact that the dialectical breach created by
Lenin's Revolution and its aftermath has not, in fact, been healed
or discarded: exactly as the Soviet defector Anatoliy Golitsyn
advised the disinterested CIA: see The Perestroika Deception by
Anatoliy Golitsyn, edited by Christopher Story, available from the
books [Edward Harle Limited] segment of this website.
(3): Reproduced from our report dated
THE TEXT OF MR. HENRY A. WAXMAN'S LETTER TO MR. DAVID J. LESAR, C.E.O. OF
HALLIBURTON CO., DATED 30TH APRIL 2010, DEMANDING ALL DOCUMENTS.
HENRY A. WAXMAN, CALIFORNIA, CHAIRMAN
JOE BARTON, TEXAS, RANKING MEMBER
COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE
Congress of the United States
House of Representatives
2125 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515-6115
Majority: (202) 225 2927
Minority: (202) 225 3641
April 30, 2010-05-04
Mr David J. Lesar
US Corporate Headquarters
3000 North Sam Houston Parkway East
Houston, Texas 77032
Dear Mr Lesar
According to a report in The Wall Street Journal today, one possible
cause of the explosion that destroyed the
Deepwater Horizon drilling
rig and led to the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico could be a
problem with the cementing that was supposed to seal the well. In
this procedure, cement is used to plug the well and to fill gaps
between the well pipe and the hole drilled into the ocean floor in
order to prevent combustible oil and gas from escaping.
Problems with the cementing process have frequently been identified
as causes of oil well blowouts. The article quoted one independent
expert who said:
“The initial likely cause of gas coming to the
surface had something to do with the cement” (1).
provided cementing services for the Deepwater Horizon rig.
As part of the Committee’s investigation into the cause of the oil
spill, we ask that you take three steps. First, we request that you
arrange a briefing on May 5, 2010, for the Committee staff with
Halliburton officials knowledgeable about Halliburton’s cementing
activities at the Deepwater Horizon oil rig.
Second, we ask you to provide the Committee with all documents in
Halliburton’s possession relating to,
the explosion at the Deepwater
the possibility or risk of an explosion
or blowout at the Deepwater Horizon rig
the status, adequacy, quality,
monitoring, and inspection of the cementing work relating to the
Deepwater Horizon rig
We request that you provide these documents on May 7, 2010. An
attachment to this letter provides additional information on how to
respond to Committee document requests.
Third, we ask that you preserve for potential future production to
the Committee all documents relating to Halliburton’s operations at
and involvement with the Deepwater Horizon rig.
We appreciate your assistance with the Committee’s investigation. We
believe it is essential that the spill and its causes are thoroughly
investigated. If you have any questions regarding this request,
please contact Meredith Fuchs of the Committee staff at (202)
Henry A. Waxman, Chairman
Chairman, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
cc. The Honorable Joe Barton, Ranking Member
The Honorable Michael Burgess, Ranking Member,
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
(1) Drilling Process Attracts Scrutiny in Rig Explosion, The Wall
Street Journal, April 30, 2010.
(4): Text of the Memorial Notice for John
reproduced from our report dated 2nd
May 2010 [Archive]:
JOHN MARTIN HEMENWAY (Age 47)
On April 30, 2010 of Bedford, VA. Beloved husband of 7 years to
Stephanie; loving father of Andrew Branham Hemenway; devoted son of
John and Betty Hemenway; beloved brother of Catherine and Edward
Siewick, Jane and John Sullivan, David and Margaret Hemenway and
Pre-deceased by his beloved sister Mary Joyce Hemenway Williams. Also survived by many loving nieces, nephews,
relatives and friends.
Memorial Service on Tuesday, May 4, at 4:30 p.m. at Otterville
United Methodist Church, Bedford, VA. In lieu of flowers memorials
may be made to the John M. Hemenway Camp CHILD Scholarship for
special needs children c/o Bedford Primary School, 807 College
Street, Bedford, VA 24523.
(5): ‘Thirty Days: Hitler’s Thirty Days to
Power: January 1933’,
Henry Ashby Turner, Jr., Addison-Wesley
Publishing Company, New York etc., 1996, ISBN 0-201-40714-0, page 164.
‘Coup d’état by installments’, precisely accurate characterization of
pan-German power-grabbing methodology.
Konrad Heiden, Der Fuehrer,
Boston, MA, 1944, page 597.