by Jon Rappoport
June 15, 2013
If you control the use of words and numbers, you can make trillions of
dollars, and you can hide scandals that would otherwise take you down into
infamy and prison.
You can pretty much operate a whole sector of society and remain untouched.
Nowhere is this more clear than in the criminal work of the US Centers
for Disease Control (CDC).
The real name of that agency should be: Centers for Disease Information
Control. That’s what they do. They manipulate words and numbers to
present fictional images to the public.
They’re a tax-funded PR front for the medical cartel. A 24/7 psyop.
“Yes, of course I’m a criminal. I work for
Here is the latest blockbuster.
After writing about fake vaccine science since 1988, I thought I’d seen it
Wild falsehoods about vaccines creating immunity; suppressed information
about toxic ingredients in the shots; the absence of proper controlled
studies proving vaccines are safe and effective.
But now Peter Doshi, PhD, writing in the online BMJ (British Medical
Journal), reveals a new monstrosity. It’s all based on the revelation that
most “flu” is not the flu.
Follow this closely. If you blink, you might miss it.
You see, as Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory
samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs. Here is
the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a
most of the people in America who are
diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies.
So they don’t have the flu.
Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it
couldn’t possibly prevent all those “flu cases” that aren’t flu cases. The
vaccine couldn’t possibly work.
The vaccine isn’t designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.
Actually, most flu cases are,
or “fungal cases”
or “pollution cases”
or “tainted food” cases
or “eating GMO cases,”
...or something else. But they aren’t the flu.
Here’s the exact quote from Peter Doshi’s BMJ review, “Influenza
- Marketing Vaccines by Marketing Disease” (BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):
“But perhaps the cleverest aspect of the
influenza marketing strategy surrounds the claim that ‘flu’ and
‘influenza’ are the same. The distinction seems subtle, and purely
But general lack of awareness of the
difference might be the primary reason few people realize that even the
ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of
wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only
deal with a small part of the ‘flu’ problem because most ‘flu’ appears
to have nothing to do with influenza.
Every year, hundreds of thousands of
respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on
average 16% are found to be influenza positive.
“…It’s no wonder so many people feel that ‘flu shots’ don’t work: for
most flus, they can’t.”
Because most diagnosed cases of the
flu aren’t the flu.
So even if you’re a true believer in mainstream vaccine theory, you’re on
the short end of the stick here. They’re conning your socks off.
Doshi points out the wordplay distinction between “flu” and “influenza.”
But let’s go even simpler and say:
most of the time, diagnosed flu isn’t flu.
In an ethical world, medical researchers and
bureaucrats would blow the whistle.
“Hey, we’re diagnosing huge numbers of
people with the flu, but that turns out to be a meaningless term,
because they don’t have an influenza virus. So they couldn’t have the
These fake ‘flu cases’ couldn’t have
benefited from any flu vaccine under the sun BECAUSE THE PATIENTS DON’T
HAVE THE FLU.”
But the whistle isn’t blown. Too much money and
too many reputations are riding on ignoring the obvious truth.
A patient walks into a doctor’s office. He’s sick. He’s coughing. He has a
fever. His muscles ache.
The doctor says,
“You have the flu. Did you get your flu shot
“No,” the patient says.
The doctor gives him a stern look.
“Well, you should have. See? You’re sick
now. The vaccine would have prevented that.”
Again, even by conventional standards, the odds are very high the vaccine
would have made no difference at all. Because the odds are very high this
patient doesn’t have an influenza virus.
Overwhelmingly, doctors diagnose the flu with a casual eyeball glance. The
patient has a familiar cluster of symptoms? It’s flu season? Okay, it’s the
With an ongoing blizzard of
psyop-marketing, people accept “flu” and
react emotionally to the propaganda about it.
Another branch of that propaganda is delivered to frighten Americans into
getting a flu shot: the CDC persistently claims that, every year in the US,
36,000 people die of the flu. We’ve all read and heard that figure, over and
It’s a “necessary” statistic for the CDC. They need to promote it. They need
to convince the population that seasonal flu is dangerous.
The American people don’t understand that it’s a lie, a grossly manufactured
delusion that bears no resemblance to reality.
In December of 2005, the British Medical Journal (online) published
another shocking report by Peter Doshi, which spelled out the delusion, and
created tremors throughout the halls of the CDC.
Here is a quote from Doshi’s report:
“[According to CDC statistics], ‘influenza
and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001 - 61,777 of which were
attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the
flu virus positively identified.”
You see, the CDC has created one category that
combines flu and pneumonia deaths. Why do they do this? Because they
disingenuously assume that the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming
from the flu.
This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes. But even
worse, in all the flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of
an influenza virus.
Therefore, the CDC could not say, with assurance, that more than 18 people
died of influenza in 2001. Not 36,000 deaths. 18 deaths.
Doshi continues his assessment of published CDC flu-death statistics:
“Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC] data show an
average of 1348 [flu] deaths per year (range 257 to 3006).”
These figures refer to flu separated out from
This death toll is obviously far lower than the parroted 36,000 figure.
However, when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to actually
find the flu virus in patients, the numbers of flu deaths plummet even
In other words, it’s all promotion and hype.
“Well, uh, we say that 36,000 people die
from the flu every year in the US. But actually, it’s closer to 20.
However, we can’t admit that, because if we did, we’d be exposing our
The whole campaign to scare people into
getting a flu shot would have about the same effect as warning people to
carry iron umbrellas, in case toasters fall out of upper-story windows…
and, by the way, we’d be put in prison for fraud.”
In 2009, as the heralded Level 6 global
pandemic, Swine Flu, was proving to be a bust and a trickle, Sharyl
Attkisson (CBS News) discovered that the CDC had stopped counting the
number of Swine Flu cases in America.
The CDC had stopped counting, because their tests on diagnosed flu patients
showed so many who didn’t have the flu virus, who didn’t have the flu at
Attkisson’s reporting was explosive.
It was threatening to expose the whole
What would happen if it became common
knowledge that most people diagnosed with the flu don’t have the
What would happened to the campaigns to
get people to take flu vaccines?
What would happen if it became common
knowledge that absurdly few people die from the flu?
Attkisson was muzzled.
And the CDC doubled down and suddenly claimed
there were undoubtedly TENS OF MILLIONS cases of Swine Flu in the US. This,
after only several thousand cases had been reported.
This is on the order of saying a a dry creek-bed in the woods is actually
the Mississippi River. Twisting words and numbers and painting false
pictures is the CDC’s job.
Finally, remember that the CDC is organized under the Department of Health
and Human Services, which is a cabinet post in the executive branch.
So everything the CDC does, every pysop it launches and maintains, is
ultimately at the pleasure of 'the
president'. The president may plead ignorance, he may plead
many things. But in the chain of command, he is responsible for the vast
crimes the CDC commits.
In other words, if the whole flu psyop were broadly exposed, the
scandal could travel all the up into the White House.