by Mike Adams
November 18, 2009
As the author of the
New York Times bestseller, "Knockout
- Interviews with Doctors Who Are Curing Cancer,"
Suzanne Somers is making waves across the cancer industry.
powerful, inspired message of informed hope is reaching millions of
readers who are learning about the many safe, effective options for
treating cancer that exist outside the realm of the conventional
cancer industry (chemotherapy, surgery and radiation).
Recently, Suzanne Somers spoke with NaturalNews, to share the
inspiration for her new book Knockout.
"People are just
starving for some new information... for other options, for hope
in [treating] cancer," she explained.
The full interview with
Somers explains why she's so concerned about the current course of
the cancer industry:
"In 2010, cancer
will be the biggest killer in the world. I fear for everybody
walking into the present cancer protocol. It's going to make
billions and billions of dollars for the industry, which is
already a $200 billion-a-year business. It's going to bankrupt
families. It causes expensive deaths. It emaciates people and
they die anyway.
Why not look into
the options that are offered in Knockout? Why not look
into Dr. Burzynski out of Houston? Why not look into Dr.
Gonzalez in New York or Dr. Forsythe out of Nevada?
a different protocol that doesn't require harsh chemicals or
degrading the body."
In the interview,
Suzanne also explains the limitations of chemotherapy and why
cancer industry has failed the
"There are only
three kinds of cancer that respond to chemotherapy: Testicular
cancer, childhood leukemia, some lymphomas including
Non-Hodgkin's," she says.
"For all of us who
have raised money marching, going to black-tie fundraisers,
we've thrown billions and billions of dollars at pharmaceutical
companies and the FDA to find a cure, and it has failed. They do
not have a cure."
causing more harm than good
In the interview, Somers also discusses the problems
When asked for her
thoughts on the US government's sudden change in position that now
says women under 50 should never receive mammograms, Somers
"I have information
so shocking in Knockout about mammograms that I have been
reluctant on television to even bring it up, because to say
anything negative about mammograms is going against the gold
So I was thrilled
when I saw this report yesterday. Nobody's saying the real truth
[about the harm caused by mammograms].
They don't want to open
Pandora's Box... you mean a lot of the women who faithfully had
mammograms got their cancer from mammograms?"
What's in the
Suzanne Somers' book presents a collection of interviews from
leading doctors who have developed and now apply natural cancer
therapies to patients, producing outstanding results.
To gather information
for her book, Somers explains,
"I called doctors, I
interviewed their patients, I talked to hundreds of people, I
interviewed science writers, PhDs, neuroscientists,
nutritionists... even the scientific advisory board of Life
And rather than
preaching to people about what they should or shouldn't do, Somers'
book simply provides new information and new options to men and
women who want to know more before making a potentially deadly
decision about chemotherapy.
"You've got to get
smart and connect the dots and ask yourself, with all the money
going into [conventional] cancer, do they have an answer? The
answer is no. We're on our own, so let's look at these
independent doctors who are having success," Somers says.
presented in Somers' book, not surprisingly, has raised the ire of
the conventional cancer industry and all their powerful allies
(including more than a few organizations in the mainstream media).
That's why Somers'
message has been viciously attacked by conventional cancer and
chemotherapy pushers who see the information presented in
Knockout as a threat to their authority (and repeat business).
interferes with Big Business's bottom line," explains Somers.
"But until what Big Business is doing is good for us, and for
the betterment of our health and mankind, then I think people
have to speak out about it."
And she's speaking out
with a powerful, inspired voice.
But there are real
solutions for cancer, and there are doctors delivering "alternative"
cancer treatments right now that are producing astonishing results
(putting conventional chemotherapy to shame). Suzanne's book lists a
wealth of resources where you can find more information about
natural cancer treatments and the clinics that offer them.
Here's a short list of some of the health experts she mentions (many
more are listed in her book):
Do you know
someone just diagnosed with cancer?
If so, send them the link to this article.
Make sure they listen to
this interview with Suzanne Somers. Information is power, and
by providing your family members, friends or coworkers with more
information and more options, you are empowering them with precisely
the kind of information that might very well save their lives.
Chemotherapy is extremely toxic to the human body. It causes
permanent damage to the brain, heart and kidneys. Mammograms
harm ten times as many women as they help.
Don't your loved ones
deserve to know about the options available right now that can treat
and reverse cancer without destroying their health? That's what
you'll learn in this interview and in Suzanne Somers' "Knockout"
Inform yourself, and
help empower others with knowledge - the kind of knowledge the
cancer industry would prefer people never had access to.
Cancer Industry Desperately Needs Mammogram
to Recruit Patients and Generate Repeat
by Mike Adams
November 19, 2009
Any time you threaten to
take away repeat customer from the businesses that make up the
cancer industry, you're in for a political fight.
United States Preventive Services Task Force released new
recommendations advising against mammograms for women under 50 (and
recommending only bi-annual screenings after that), the cancer
industry went berserk.
Mammograms, you see, are the bread and butter of the for-profit
They serve two very
Mammograms are a
clever tool for recruiting patients into a highly-profitable
regimen of chemotherapy drugs, radiation and surgery that,
nine times out of ten, isn't even medically justified.
detection technology behind mammograms is now so advanced it
can detect tiny tumors present in virtually everyone,
whether they're dangerous or not.
This has lead to a huge
increase in "false positives" and dangerous over-treatment
of cancers that would be better off just left alone (or
treated with anti-cancer nutrients and superfoods).
But mammograms are a great way to scare women into
unnecessary cancer treatments. So they're pure genius when
it comes to recruiting new patients using the fear tactics
the cancer industry has come to rely on.
CAUSE more cancer
purpose of mammograms is to cause cancer by exposing women's
breasts (and heart tissues) to ionizing radiation.
subjected to repeated exposure of such radiation, the human
body will undergo DNA mutations and inevitably be afflicted
This is how the
cancer industry can make predictions like "one out of every
three women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in her
lifetime..." - they know this to be true because they are
the ones causing the cancer in the first place!
If you took your car to
a mechanic to have the oil changed, and that mechanic poured
corrosive bits of metal into your car's engine that caused long-term
engine damage, would you continue to take your car to that same
mechanic year after year? And if so, would you PAY that mechanic to
repair the damage he actually caused?
That's what women are essentially doing when they receive
Each year, as they
dutifully get their mammograms, they are exposing themselves to the
very kind of radiation that causes cancer, practically guaranteeing
they will eventually be diagnosed with cancer. (At which point the
oncologist will say something like, "See? Good thing we do these
mammograms every year, or we wouldn't have caught this tumor!")
The false cancer slogan that "early detection saves lives" would be
more accurately modified to read:
to radiation causes cancer.
More destructive than
X-raying your feet!
Did you know that in the 1940's, shoe stores used to have their own
X-ray machines? Customers would try on a shoe, stick their foot in
the X-ray fluoroscope machine, and see on the viewing screen how
their bones fit in the shoes.
It seemed like a really neat idea, and it sold a lot of shoes. But
at the same time, it also dosed customers' feet with an astonishing
20 - 100+ rems per minute of radiation.
As you might suspect, a lot of these shoe store customers developed
very serious health problems with their feet, including DNA
mutations and cancerous lesions.
Even long after the radiation risk of such shoe-fitting machines was
known to be extremely harmful, doctors stayed silent about it. The
machines were never banned, either... they were quietly phased out
in the 1950's after raising the cancer risks of literally millions
Mammograms are the modern-day version of the X-ray
shoe-fitting machine. They're represent a harmful, cancer-causing
technology that people mistakenly think offers some benefit for
them. But every time you use the machine, your risk of cancer goes
up another notch.
Meanwhile, just like in
the 1940's, most conventional doctors stay silent about the cancer
risks resulting from such radiation! (But more and more informed
doctors are finally speaking out against mammography...)
If you were an evil genius who wanted to design and manufacture a
cancer-causing machine, it would be difficult to beat the
present-day mammography machine. It exposes human tissue to
high-powered radiation that, if repeated often enough, practically
guarantees cancer will eventually develop. In one sense, it's sort
of a "slow suicide machine" that takes years (or decades) to
complete its work on your body.
But before you die,
you get to spend your life savings on "treatments" that will leave
you bankrupt just before they leave you dead. That's the whole
point of the cancer industry, after all: To maximize profits from
Mammography is a
key piece of the puzzle in accomplishing precisely that.
The truth us, mammography offers no net saving in lives at all. In
the procedure harms far more women than it
But at the same time, it's a "perfect weapon" for generating
lucrative repeat business. If you're an oncologist, the best way to
ensure you'll have a cancer patient to treat at age 55 is to start
exposing them to radiation at age 40 (or earlier). It's sort of like
a diabetes clinic offering free candy to children: At some point,
after they eat enough processed sugar, they'll come back as
repeat customers suffering from diabetes.
That's why the cancer industry freaked out when a U.S. govt. task
force issued its new cancer screening guidelines. All of a sudden,
the cancer industry realized it would lose a lot of repeat business
if the screenings stopped. So they lobbied hard for some sort of
And they nearly got it.
Today Health and
Human Services Secretary
went on the air to announce that the task force
announcing the new mammography recommendations,
"does not set
federal policy and they don't determine what services are
covered by the federal government."
She went on to explain,
"My message to women
is simple. Mammograms have always been an important lifesaving
tool in the fight against breast cancer and they still are
In other words, keep
getting your breasts irradiated. It's important for the U.S.
The disease industry
is counting on your future cancer, didn't you know?
The Associated Press says the new mammography recommendations from
the government panel have "left women across the country confused
about which advice to take."
Let's see, there's a machine that smashes your breasts, that hurts
like the devil, and that blasts your breasts, heart and lungs with
All the evidence now points to the fact that the risk of harm caused
by the machine is far greater than the risk of have your life saved
by early cancer detection - especially for women under 50.
So what is there to be confused about?
The only confusion that
exists is caused by the cancer industry itself which has always
operated on the principle of keeping women uninformed and confused,
knowing full well that people who are confused can be more easily
manipulated with fear into surrendering to high-profit treatments
That's the whole point of the industry, after all:
To make money
treating cancer, whether the patient needs it or not.
Big, big money
to be made by giving women cancer
The cancer industry likes to hide behind the false idea that it's
"helping people" or "saving lives," but in reality, it's a
for-profit industry that's out to maximizing profits just like every
And as we all know, medical corporations have
absolutely no ethics: They will engage in outright criminal fraud,
bribery of doctors, falsifying clinical trial data, price-fixing
their products and overcharging Medicaid programs, and other similar
crimes, all of which
have been documented.
For these same corporations to intentionally cause cancer in women
as a strategy for future profits is just standard operating
procedure. They don't even think about acting with integrity or
compassion: It's all about the money.
So what if a few million women
have to die along the way, right? We've got shareholders to think
Cancer is a $200 billion a year business, Suzanne Somers told
me yesterday in an exclusive interview (above
report). That gives the industry 200 billion reasons
to keep on exposing women to radiation and creating more repeat
That's why the cancer profiteers will fight these new
recommendations tooth and nail - their livelihoods depend on making
sure more women get cancer!
Mammography is, by any honest assessment, pure quackery. It's no
more accurate at detecting tumors needing acute treatment than just
waving your hand over someone and guessing whether they have a tumor
that needs treatment. In fact, waving your hand over someone is a
lot less harmful, so it's actually better.
A far better alternative is
thermography. It can detect breast
cancer tumors using the infrared heat emitted by a tumor's blood
supply. It's non-invasive, safe, affordable and doesn't involve
And remember, even if you're diagnosed with breast cancer,
chemotherapy does not work on breast cancer! You'll need a
different, more natural approach.
Read Suzanne Somers'
to find some answers, or
read about Vitamin D here.