by Michael E. Salla
from Exopolitics Website
Prelude to a False Flag Alien
He said that the final stage of planning for a false flag event that dates back to the 1950's is about to be rolled out, and that recent disclosures about aliens being involved in a galactic slave trade of humans is part of a deception campaign.
The goal is to condition humanity into accepting a scenario of evil aliens intent on conquering humanity.
Greer stated that advanced electronic weapons using psychotronic holographic technologies were used in order to produce 'scripted memories' which could be downloaded into individuals.
The implanted memories, according to Greer, could be so realistic that the targeted individuals would swear that the experiences were genuine.
Greer says that he was first told about these advanced psychotronic holographic technologies around 1994, by a senior scientist familiar with classified programs.
More recently, a retired Lt. Colonel from the Air Force Office of Special Investigations warned that the psychotronic holographic technologies had laid the foundation for the alien false flag event that was imminent.
Greer did not name the Air Force intelligence officer, but said that his testimony was part of the upcoming documentary Unacknowedged, and that the Air Force officer's testimony would be released in full soon after the documentary's release.
Greer's claim of the existence of psychotronic holographic technologies used for psychological warfare operations that began in the 1950's is supported by documentary evidence.
It is known that psychological warfare was used as an important means of deceiving the public about the reality of flying saucers and extraterrestrial life.
The 1953 CIA sponsored Robertson Panel release the Durant Report recommending debunking the flying saucer phenomenon by using the mass media in what was the beginning of a psychological warfare program against the general public.
The 1975 'Senate Select Committee to Study Government Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities,' chaired by Senator Frank Church, revealed that the CIA's MKUltra experiments dated back to the early 1950's and that various psychological tools were used to implant false memories into targeted individuals.
Indeed, the first Manchurian Candidate movie, starring Frank Sinatra was released in 1962 and depicted military personnel being subjected to early brain washing methods in order to create sleeper assassins.
As computer technologies subsequently became more advanced in the classified world, it became possible for very realistic holographic images to be electronically downloaded into people's brains to produce "scripted memories." It is the development and widespread use of such technologies that Greer warns against when it comes to whistleblower and abductee testimonies that describe evil aliens and their alleged nefarious activities.
Greer discusses military abductions (MILAB's) and how sophisticated technologies have been used to give the appearance that aliens are the ones behind the abductions and the various abusive actions used against the victims.
Greer provides as a notable example the November 1989 abduction of the United Nations Secretary General Javier Perez de Cuellar during a secret UN initiative to officially disclose the existence of extraterrestrial visitors to the world.
Greer, in a November 2015 lecture (How the Secret Government Works - The Most Explosive Expose), says that he was told about the abduction incident by Crown Prince Hans-Adam from Lichtenstein at a meeting they had in 1994:
According to Greer, the world leaders were allegedly so intimidated by the alien threats that they backed off the disclosure plan.
Greer gives this as an example of how military abductions are used to create staged alien abductions to prejudice not only the general public about extraterrestrial life, but also world leaders. This is where a major problem with Greer's method and analysis of alien abduction events begins to emerge.
I've discussed Greer's analysis of the alleged "staged" alien abduction involving de Cuellar in a December 2015 article 'Was UN Secretary General Abducted by Aliens in 1989 to Prevent ET Disclosure?'
What is important to mention here is that Greer's analysis that this was an example of a 'staged alien abduction' based on what he was told by Prince Hans-Adam, is contradicted by multiple witness interviews and correspondence conducted by famed abduction researcher, Budd Hopkins, with key figures in the abduction event.
Hopkins book 'Witness - The True Story of the Brooklyn Bridge UFO Abductions' provides abundant witness and documentary evidence that this was a genuine abduction incident witnessed by a world leader and other senior diplomats.
He interviewed an extensive number of both witnesses and participants in the abduction, which reveals that some of the individuals involved had been regularly abducted by the aliens since their youth.
Hopkins produced transcripts of interviews and letters by the participants detailing these life-long abductions that culminated in the 1989 incident.
His conclusion is that the abduction was a genuine case of extraterrestrials abducting a prominent world leader, who he did not identify in the book but revealed later was de Cuellar, with other senior diplomats watching in order to send a warning.
He reproduced a portion of a letter from one of the victims to the abduction who was part of the security detail for de Cuellar:
Hopkins book validates much of what Greer was told by Prince Hans-Adam that world leaders witnessed and were involved in an alien abduction event in 1989.
However, Greer dismissed the portion of Prince Hans-Adams' testimony that the abduction was conducted by extraterrestrials, by insisting instead that it was a 'staged alien abduction'.
Greer based his conclusion solely on his overall analysis of multiple whistleblower reports revealing the existence of false flag alien abductions in general, and of advanced technologies making this possible.
What's vital to point out here is that Greer does not identify one witness or whistleblower referring to the 1989 event being a staged military abduction. The obvious problem here is that Greer offers nothing but his conjecture that the 1989 alien abduction was a staged event.
In contrast, Hopkins spent several years researching his book, which was published in 1996, where he methodically interviewed multiple witnesses and participants that conclusively reveal that the event was a genuine extraterrestrial abduction after all.
The important fact to keep in mind here is that Greer had nearly 20 years to consider Hopkins data on this vitally important case, which he had been privately briefed about in 1994 by Prince Hans-Adam. After all, it involved major world leaders discussing a plan for official disclosure of extraterrestrial life that was aborted at the 11th hour by an alleged alien abduction.
Hopkins data could help considerably in determining what had really happened. Instead, Greer decided to ignore Hopkins investigation entirely.
The 1989 abduction incident involving Secretary General de Cuellar, is a clear example of where Greer dismisses or doesn't even consider information that runs contrary to his analysis of such abduction events.
After all, Hopkins book was published in 1996, which gave Greer plenty of time to analyze Hopkins data and compare it to his analysis of the de Cuellar abduction which he publicly discussed in his 2015 lecture.
This is where it is fair to raise the question of whether Greer is an impartial analyst of human extraterrestrial encounters as he claims, or deliberately filters out egregious cases of alien actions on humans, in order to promote his own cosmic world view.
There are other examples of Greer dismissing data that does not fit in with his hypothesis that negative or intrusive alien abductions, are really staged military abductions using advanced classified technologies.
discussed this in
a 2006 article "Exopolitics
versus Exospin - A Response to Dr Steven Greer" where I responded to Greer's critique of my
exopolitics research which he had taken the unusual step of
The conclusion reached in my 2006 response was that Greer is not an impartial analyst of human extraterrestrial encounters, but a firm advocate of the view that all such encounters are positive and beneficial, and that witness reports of encounters to the contrary are in fact a result of staged military abductions.
The way in which Greer removes contrary data in his analyses of human extraterrestrial encounters raises legitimate questions over his intellectual honesty, and ultimate agenda.
Given his status as a leading figure in the extraterrestrial disclosure community, Greer's questionable approach requires critical scrutiny when it comes to his critique of others offering analyses of human extraterrestrial encounters that differ to his own cosmic world view.
To illustrate the problem here, it is worthwhile examining the next part of Greer's November 13 lecture. He named two individuals that have recently come forward to reveal their knowledge about secret space programs:
Greer declares both are victims of these psychotronic holographic technologies where they have been given scripted memories of negative human extraterrestrial encounters.
In his lecture, Greer said the following about Goode and what he believes are the scripted memories he was given as a child:
Greer goes on to criticize Gaia TV which has provided a highly respected media platform for Goode's testimony to enter the public arena through the Cosmic Disclosure show:
Greer went on to point out that while he and Goode agree on a great number of issues concerning global peace, raising consciousness and spiritual evolution, that Goode's testimony about secret space programs and egregious human extraterrestrial encounters are scripted and have no reliable corroborating data points:
We have finally arrived at the crux of Greer's critique of Goode, his testimony about secret space programs is contaminated by scripted memories introduced into his life during military abductions that began at age six.
It's worth keeping in mind here that Goode acknowledges that from age six he was indeed trained through a military abduction program.
When he turned 16 (1986), he says he was then taken to his final training and subsequent service in secret space programs up until 2007. Goode states that he was then age-regressed, sent back in time and had his memories wiped.
Goode says that the memory wiping process was not successful and he retained the bulk of his memories acquired during his "20 and back" program.
He then lived the next 20/21 years as a normal civilian as depicted in the following timeline.
It is important to point out here that Greer's critique that Goode was given scripted memories is consistent with events as Goode described up to age 16 (1986), when he says he recalled his memories of having served for twenty years in secret space programs.
After all, how could Goode be sure that the 20 years of memories he now had, after being returned to civilian life, were genuine, or had not been contaminated by the scripted memories Greer was discussing?
By 1986, we know that classified computer technology was very sophisticated and could be used to implant false or 'scripted' memories into people involved in Military Abduction Programs thus making Greer's assessment plausible.
There are several reasons, however, as to why Goode's memories of having served for twenty years in secret space programs may be accurate after all.
First, according to Goode, beginning in 2011, he started having contact experiences with a group of extraterrestrials he calls the Blue Avians, which belonged to what he describes the Sphere Being Alliance, and also with personnel belonging to an Ancient Mayan secret space program.
It was Goode's reference to this Mayan secret space program that got my attention when I first began investigating his testimony in April 2015 due to my own experience in Mexico City in 2010 which I wrote about in "Ancient Space Programs and Human-Extraterrestrial Alliance Meetings".
Goode says that in March 2015, he was taken to a secret moon based Lunar Operations Command, when he became the official delegate for the Sphere Being Alliance. He then began liaising with officers and personnel from the secret space programs he had previously served on from 1987 to 2007.
Importantly, Goode was stating that in 2015, the leaders of these programs that were part of a "Secret Space Program Alliance Council", confirmed his earlier service.
This suggests that Goode's recollections as a 16 year old of having served for twenty years in several secret space programs were genuine, and not a result of scripted memories as Greer is postulating.
Second, there are many aspects of Goode's testimony concerning contemporary exopolitical events that were based on genuine insider information he was receiving about secret space programs.
I have written of the extensive circumstantial evidence supporting Goode's testimony in the book, Insiders Reveal Secret Space Programs and Extraterrestrial Alliances.
An example was that Goode's claims of slave labor being exploited on corporate colonies on Mars, which he began discussing in early 2015, was almost the exact scenario discussed later by the British Interplanetary Society at a meeting held in June 2015.
The meeting was attended by approximately 30 prominent figures in the British academic community, aerospace industry and even members of the intelligence community.
Finally, there is the testimony of William Tompkins whose information first came out in a December 2015 autobiography, Selected by Extraterrestrials, which corroborated much of what Goode had previously revealed.
Tompkins provided extensive documents to support his claims, which have subsequently been corroborated in part by Freedom of Information Act documents and the testimonies of three retired Navy officers.
Since Greer also provides a critique of Tompkins secret space programs testimony in his November 2016 lecture, I will examine Tompkins claims and Greer's critique in part two of this series of articles in order to reach a final conclusion regarding Greer's critique of both Goode and Tompkins.
To conclude thus far, it's worth noting that Greer has not provided one document or witness/whistleblower testimony to support his claim that Goode is revealing scripted memories about a galactic slave trade involving abducted humans.
Greer's criticism is based solely on his conjectures, which as evidenced in the 1989 Perez de Cuellar alien abduction case, are highly questionable.
This raises considerable doubt over Greer's core claim in his November 13 lecture that Goode and Tompkin's testimonies about secret space programs and egregious extraterrestrial activities, are a prelude to an impending false flag alien event.
Secret Space Program Disclosures
and False Flag Alien Events
On November 13, Disclosure Project founder Dr. Steven Greer claimed in a lecture that final preparations for a false flag alien invasion were being facilitated by the recent secret space program disclosures of Corey Goode and William Tompkins.
Greer claims that both are victims of psychotronic holographic technologies where they have been implanted with scripted memories of evil aliens abusing captive humans.
Part one of this two part series, examined Greer's claims regarding Goode. This article examines what Greer had to say about Tompkins and his information.
A number of researchers into secret space program disclosures, including myself, have found Tompkins testimony and documentation to be the most powerful corroboration yet to emerge for many elements of Goode's earlier disclosures.
Consequently, Greer's critique of Tompkins is very significant for assessing the validity of Goode's testimony.
In his November 13 lecture, Greer introduces the concept of "alienism" which he defines as follows:
He has the following to say about Tompkins testimony, which in Greer's view, promotes alienism through scripts prepared by military programs that promote the idea of threatening extraterrestrials:
Significantly, Greer refers to "military programs connected to Mr. Tompkins," yet provides no details of such a connection.
He has no documents or witnesses of his own to corroborate his claim that Tompkins' memories are scripts created by military programs.
Instead he makes a general reference to a USAF intelligence officer, who worked for the Air Force Office of Special Investigations, who has new information about Unacknowledged Special Access Programs that will be released in Greer's forthcoming Unacknowledged documentary.
Greer argues that Tompkins descriptions of benevolent human-looking aliens and malevolent Reptilian-looking aliens conspiring to respectively assist or sabotage US Navy efforts to build a secret space program is a form of alienism:
Now it's important to note here that Tompkins in his autobiography and subsequent interviews was giving a descriptive account of two different extraterrestrial groups that Navy spies had discovered in relation to Nazi Germany's secret aerospace programs.
The human looking-extraterrestrials operated in a more benign ethical way with civilians, while the Reptilian aliens behaved in a more imperialistic manner, wanting the Nazis to develop space fleets as a mercenary force that could join the Reptilians in deep space conquest.
Tompkins accounts of what the Navy spies were relaying during his covert service from 1942 to 1946, was based on trained intelligence operatives taking special note of the different actors and forces involved in helping the Nazis.
The spies then reported this in detailed debriefings, which Tompkins had to relay in briefing documents to different U.S. aerospace corporations.
It's important to note that Tompkins accounts of the aliens are very descriptive as would be expected in an intelligence gathering program, rather than emotional or philosophical accounts of them.
Therefore it is mistaken to imply that Tompkins and the Navy spies were implicitly racists, whose deep biases led to them promoting alienism when reporting on different extraterrestrial races involved in Nazi aerospace programs.
In his response to a question about the veracity of the testimonies of Goode and Tompkins, Greer raises the issue of corroboration, and refers to both of their testimonies being contaminated by "seductive and interesting" memory scripts:
As far as "multiple points of corroboration" of Tompkins testimony is concerned, there are indeed documents and witnesses supporting many aspects of his testimony.
Larry Marsh confirmed in a private interview that Tompkins was a very competent organizer in creating the Council, and that the Council was very important to the regular Navy.
He finally added that Tompkins was very knowledgeable on topics of interest to the Navy, which was a cryptic way of acknowledging that Tompkins was indeed conducting Special Projects at Medford.
Bill Tompkins with Rear Admiral Larry Marsh
at opening ceremony of the Rogue Valley Council Navy League
Greer's insistence that "multiple points of corroboration" are required for testimonies such as Tompkins, is more than satisfied by what is known so far about Tompkins in terms of documents and corroborating witnesses.
Greer fails to acknowledge any of the above "multiple points of corroboration" for Tompkins testimony, and instead simply makes the assertion that Tompkins testimony is contaminated by false memory scripts about evil Reptilian aliens and benevolent human looking extraterrestrials with no direct evidence whatsoever.
Greer's critiques of Tompkins and Goode (see Part One), fails to be persuasive since he provides no direct evidence in terms of documents or witnesses that specifically identify either of them as having received scripted memories about evil aliens through psychotronic holographic technologies.
More importantly, there is no evidence that Tompkins was ever subjected to any kind of military abduction program where such technologies were used.
Greer's arguments to this end are based purely on conjecture.
He makes a tenuous connection between military programs known to use psychotronic holographic technologies to induce fearful images of aliens, to Tompkins testimony simply on the grounds that Tompkins discloses the behavior of a predatory species of extraterrestrials known to have covertly operated on Earth since at least World War II.
Without providing concrete evidence, Greer is essentially attempting to discredit a highly credentialed witness for the simple reason that his testimony doesn't fit in with Greer's cosmic world view that the only bad alien is in the human imagination.
The conclusion that emerges is that Greer perceives the testimonies of Goode and Tompkins as threat, not because they give impetus to plans for a false flag alien invasion, but they threaten Greer's "limited disclosure" narrative.
Greer's disclosure narrative is based on ideas of repressed antigravity and free energy technologies, benign extraterrestrial contact, abusive military abductions using advanced technologies that are part of a secret military space program, and debunking evidence of secret government/military agreements with predatory alien species.
In contrast, Goode and Tompkins' information amounts to "full disclosure", which goes well beyond Greer's "limited disclosure narrative" insofar as they reveal,
As far as the false flag alien invasion that Greer claims is being unwittingly promoted by Goode and Tompkins, I found the following comment by Goode particularly helpful in understanding current plans for staging a false flag alien event:
Goode's assessment here is consistent with recent statements by Vatican theologians and astronomers that extraterrestrial life may be more ethically evolved than humanity.
This is exemplified in a conversation Greer had with deceased Vatican exorcist, Monsignor Corrado Balducci about the alleged alien threat:
Greer's relating of the conversation indicated no attempt on his part to correct or challenge Balducci's claim that ALL extraterrestrials in the universe are more ethically evolved than humans.
Rather than challenge such an assumption contrary to thousands of witness reports of invasive alien abductions, Greer thought it hilarious and a "very interesting perspective."
Greer's response is not surprising given his transparent bias towards the idea that all extraterrestrials visiting Earth are positive, and more highly evolved than humanity.
More importantly, Greer's conversation with Balducci signifies his alignment with recent Vatican initiatives to promote the idea that extraterrestrials are our "brothers in Christ." In an October 27, 2014 statement by Pope Francis, he said that extraterrestrials can be part of the plans of "God the creator" in the evolutionary process.
As Goode warns, however, the current plan for a false flag alien event has evolved from an invasion scenario, which is no longer tenable, to angelic looking extraterrestrials appearing that help establish a "New Cosmic Esoteric World Religion".
This is precisely what researchers Tom Horn and Chris Horn have been claiming the Catholic Church is preparing for in a future announcement about the existence of extraterrestrial life, and secret plans to incorporate an alien component into its theological orthodoxy.
The extraterrestrials would become a cosmic mid-wife helping humanity get closer to God through a "New Cosmic Esoteric" World Religion. Predictably, this would lead to the establishment of a priesthood and missionaries that could carry the new message to the stars.
This is how Horn and Putnam describe the Vatican plan for an alien savior to kick start a new global religion:
Ironically, rather than the testimonies of Goode and Tompkins facilitating a false flag alien invasion as Greer claims in his November 13 lecture, Greer's criticisms and limited disclosure narrative is instead facilitating a false flag alien savior event that would feature extraterrestrials helping humanity in a way that leads to the establishment of a "New Cosmic Esoteric World Religion"...