ACT III : THE GLOBAL EXPLANATION
At this stage, I should say that I am pressing on rather boldly with my
reflections. What follows is an attempt to formalize these concepts.
Naturally, whole areas of research are open to all and open scientific minds
will find substance in this new discipline to interpret into their language:
Chronotics . (Term inspired by Thierry Archer).
Time is an enigma! To us it seems linear. The past precedes the present which
precedes the future. How then can people perceive the future ?
Is this not a "nasty" problem for science to attempt to explain this
phenomenon ? But it's not examples that are lacking. Really, every day on
Earth, human beings perceive the future in premonitory dreams or various
"flashes". The question is far more complex and eminent than any regulation
of a nuclear power station or genetic manipulation. I repeat the question to
those that might not have heard it : How can the future precede the present?
We all know of Plato's cave (In this legend, people living inside a cave
think that their shadows are real, when in fact they are produced by
the light from the outside of their 'world' coming through a small hole.)
And if time was only the shadow of what it seems to be ?.
What is time such as we usually understand it ?
There are two types of time: measurable time and psychological time.
Measurable time is objective!
It is a universal agreement! It is an interval between two "phenomena":
before/after. In science, we use the second. It has its multiples and its
subdivisions. This time exists! It is very useful to organize lots of things
and for equations.
Psychological time is subjective!
Sometimes, a certain experience will seem to us to have lasted one minute in
certain circumstances, and in others, ten minutes, etc. Now, by agreement,
measured time will determine the average time and will fix in
our consciousness the acceptable proportions. 80 % of our life is calibrated
to psychological time. Curiously, we are capable of waking up at 6 o'clock
exactly, if we make the effort to will it to happen.
This "coincidence" is
called by the term of "internal clock". Nobody has ever seen it but it is
accepted, thereby adding a little more weight to our arguments. Psychological
time is said to be subjective because it seems imaginary! But has anyone
ever wondered how such a widespread thing – the imagination, does not exist
in itself ?
I would add that certain cycles and chronobiology are at the intersection of
both times and give substance to what follows.
Here is what Roland Lehouc ( Astrophysicist in the dept. of astrophysics of
the CEA - ATOMIC ENERGY AUTHORITY) says:
"We perceive time as
one-dimensional, because our thoughts seem to succeed one after the other in
a well defined order. This argument is subjective. Time could
seem one-dimensional without it being so really, a little as we lose our
sight of relief by closing an eye: we are then surrounded with flat objects
and, only habit enables us to appreciate distances"
Farther on: "With three dimensions of time and one dimension of space, only
tachyons, particles which go faster than the light, would exist "
Then: "Numerous aspects of physics would be rather different with time which
is not one-dimensional. For example, energy would no longer be just a number,
but a vector indicating the temporal direction of movement, in the same way
as the amount of movement of a mobile is a vector indicating in which spatial
direction it is moving.
As the amount of movement is conserved when the mobile is subjected to no
force, the temporal direction taken would also be a constant of movement. In
other words, if two observers who are moving according to different temporal
directions meet, they will inevitably separate to follow the irrespective
temporal trajectory, incapable of staying together. From the point of view of
an observer, the other one would appear and then disappear immediately "
(NDA: as UFOs do)
Then again: "Another important consequence of temporal multidimensionality:
certain particles would no longer be stable. In a world such as ours, a
particle can split only if the sum of the masses at rest (the mass when the
particle is immobile) of the particles produced is lower than the mass at
rest of the initial particle. This condition, which gives stability to the
proton and electron, disappears in a world of more than one temporal
dimension. For example, a proton could disintegrate into a neutron, a
positron and a neutrino; an electron could be transformed into a neutron, an
antiproton and a neutrino. The matter that we know would no longer be
stable." (NDA: it is exactly the vision of the states of matter that I had.
"states of matter").
Just as there is equivalence between mass and energy, there is an equivalence
between space and time. It expresses itself in a simple way. The principle of
simplicity of Occkam's razor says that it is the simplest explanation that is
best. But when it is a question of linking the theory of relativity and
quantum theory, we see a mountain of complexity before us. I think, and this
is fundamental, that the more space there is, less there is of time, and
inversely, less there is of space more there is of time. It is precisely the
key that elegantly weds the infinitely big and infinitely small. The
difficulty is to understand the nature of time to be convinced of it.
Jean Heidmann, astrophysicist at the origin of the SETI project, declared
that the Big Bang was not an explosion of matter but an expansion of space.
This difference often cast confusion in many minds. In the light of 3-D time,
and in particular, one of its dimensions, the density of time, the expansion
of the universe is just an appearance. As a reminder, the expansion of the
universe would be due to a considerable differential between the
thermodynamic forces tending to repel matter and the nuclear forces which, on
the contrary, attract it.
The dilemma comes from the fact that 90 % of the mass of the universe remains
hidden. This observation comes from the difference calculated between the
thermodynamic forces and the forces of atomic cohesion. So the entropic
movement would be just an illusion. Yet another. In fact, there is no choice
but to admit that all space-times coexist.
The Big Bang is a dogma in the
sense that it is perfectly arbitrary to think that the original
soup accumulated into huge masses, and galaxies, stars and into planets. If,
as is it suggested in this case, matter would be on the surface of the
membrane of a cosmic balloon why would it not be evenly spread out? We are
told that gravity is the reason! Now, we do not know the real nature of gravity except that it is a curvature of space-time. Hence, the idea that
gravity is related to the density of time and in no way explains the
formation of celestial bodies.
The further we look into space (weaker time
density) the more we see the outer layers of the universe. But also the
further we look, the further we see into the past (going back in the
direction of time). And in this case we see the internal layers of the
universe. Therefore, the combination between external layers and internal
layers reveals entropy to be an illusion.
When we look at a star (because of its matter), we perceive an "internal"
layer of the universe which is translated by a curvature of space-time, or in
other words, according to my vision, a "superior" (higher) space-time
compared to the space-time which surrounds it. In this way, the star is not
in the same position as its spatial environment.
Black holes are in a much
higher density of time and it is impossible for us to see them in
our space-time since we guess them by calculations.
If it is relatively easy to conceive, at an astronomical scale, that by
contraction of space-time we have a difference of position between a star and
its environment, it is less obvious that it's the same case with the
infinitely small because specific laws happen there, said to
be counter-intuitive. Yet there is a sign that should guide us. The space
between the nucleus and the electrons is, proportionally to their sizes, an
abyss of space (emptiness).
In reality, the universe is fractal, i.e. there are scale "jumps" within
which particular (related) laws of functioning govern each particular
space-time. It is the case with quarks, atoms, molecules, cells, organs,
bodies, groups of bodies and groups of groups which are in themselves as many
space-times. We live in the middle of a skillfully baked (wafered) cream
slice. Far from me the idea to evoke here the Great Confectioner.
You are the
only judge to appreciate the end purpose of it. My purpose is to point out
the common feature of these scales, or these layers : the wave-like character
of these demonstrations.. i.e. these vibrations, because everything is
Matter has a corpuscular/wave duality. It is exactly in the passage from
one to another, of the particle to the wave, that the increase of the density
of time happens, with a loss of mass (neutrinos, photons, electrons,
tachyons), in the process. Here too, there has been confusion since the time
of Newton. Mass is not gravity even if the effects in nature give us the
illusion of it in our time density. Mass is related to the forces of
cohesion. One of the biggest enigmas in physics is the difference in scale
between strong, weak and electromagnetic interactions on the one hand, and
gravity on the other. As a reminder, gravity is 1040 less strong than strong
Einstein demonstrated, thanks to Riemann's works
that gravity is geometrical in nature. Actually, gravity is strictly related
to space-times. Moreover, it goes through them because it participates in
their modification. Gravity increases as does the density of time. It is also
induced, in the electromagnetic forces. The queen of vibrations is the
electromagnetic wave whose spectrum has such an astronomical number of
frequencies that it makes your head swim.
Matter is seething with frequencies, even in low temperatures. At zero Kelvin
degree, states of matter change, (function of state in quantum mechanics). Now,
the rotor of a UFO "orbits" in a vacuum at absolute zero degree!
We are beginning to come out of the matrix. You really have to get out of the
observer's position to understand that what seems to us to be on the same
plane - an apple and a stone for example - are absolutely not so. We see them
as such because we belong to a "superior" (higher) space-time. In fact, we
are just on the border because, naturally, superior time densities of time
are mixing with us for whom we are "physically" merged with the apple, or the
worm which is inside.
What happens when we observe by means of a
microscope with a tunnel effect? We observe "superior" space-times just as
the astronomer sees "lower" space-times with his telescope. The difference
which we attribute to both is the apparent proportion of objects.
This proportion is totally subjective! We set up as a truth the idea that
this thing is bigger and that thing is smaller. Even if it is true in our
reality, it is a total illusion! We are comparing incomparable objects, each
belonging to its own space-time. How can we imagine the idea that an elephant
has of its own size? Any human observation is subjective because it proceeds
from an intrinsic anthropocentrism (a human point of view).
analysis is a reduction of our intellect, as much for space as for time.
Besides, our culture and our behavior cause us to continually
make judgments. Measuring instruments themselves are not to blame. It is the
interpretation of the results, stemming from an artifact belonging to a
particular space-time, that plunges and locks us inside the matrix. We
attempt irresistibly but in vain to extricate ourselves from an environment
to which we belong !
Why do all electromagnetic waves travel at the speed of light? For the
simple reason that because of their own space-time, our instruments cannot
measure anything else!
One of these erroneous interpretations, in my opinion, is the
constant of the
speed of light. How do we know that it is constant? By measuring it in our
space-time. Indeed, we measure it within our frame of reference.
Now, in the
same time, if I may say so, we ourselves have never experienced even half of
this speed. In other words, we do not know what our perception would be, even
with instruments, of this other frame of reference. What is speed, and more
still - acceleration, if it is not a modification of space-time? Remember
that Einstein indicated that the more one approaches the speed of light, the
more time expands. In this case, once again according to my vision, space
So speed is immediate data in a frame of reference, we may say
that speed itself is the reference, whereas acceleration, when it is
high enough, is a transfer from one space-time to another. Our technologies
are still too weak in order to realize this. There is an intersidereal gaping
hole between an acceleration of 10 m/s2 and an acceleration of 100 000 m/s2 (See particle accelerators below). It is exactly one of the functions of the rotor seen in the dream and which had lightning acceleration.
Another little effort! The recognition of the Strange is within reach of
seconds and of Angstroms. In matter, light is "braked" by the various
space-times which constitute the electronic levels.
To avoid a long description of the states of matter, I shall just present a
few essential points
Every electronic level has its own time density of which corresponds to
the space between the nucleus and the electron. The time density of matter is
therefore the average of these densities.
The more electronic levels there are, more the global density of time is
weak but the potential energy (number of electrons) is big. So, gravity is
due to the total value of electronic space-times. Gravity of the big masses
comes from the total number of atoms concerned, (themselves consisting of a
multitude of space-times).
The greater the density of time, more the energy is immediately available
with a minimum of energy to obtain it by the appearance of quantas of time.
Hence, the possibility of an output superior to 1. Free energy could result
from this explanation.
Potential energy increases as the distance (space) and as the opposite of
the density of time. Kinetic energy increases as the density of time
(therefore a decrease of space).
The increase of time density comes from the decreasing of these spaces. The
more levels there are, the more one can harness quantum vacuum
Quantum vacuum is represented by these spaces from which one draws energy .
The increase of time density comes from the decrease in the distance between
How does one decrease electronic space?
By compression (need of energy = radial vector: explosive method) or by
vortex in a vacuum (high speed rotation =tangential vector: gentle and
progressive method) that cause quantas of time to appear. Isotopes are
transformed into energy.
Gravity is strong for big masses (e.g. the Earth) because they have many
particles. The same thing can be obtained with a small amount of matter by
reducing the space between the nucleus and the electrons. The distance (=
temps) is the factor of conversion of gravity.
Once again, the measurements should take into account the differences in
scale. We are therefore proposing a new theory : Absolute Relativity! It can
be expressed as follows : information structures space-time, and conversely.
ACT IV : TEMPORAL QUANTAS & VIBRATIONS
Here we introduce the notion of
temporal quantas which was inspired long
after the experience of March, 2002. A quantum of time is the smallest grain
of indivisible time. It has a value, as a first estimate, of 10-44
below the time of Planck. Let us consider three frequencies belonging to
three different densities of time and place quantas of time on these waves.
In developing temporal quantas,
one can measure the differences of density.
One crosses from one density to another by the line (axis) of the present,
that is through the points of vibratory harmonics.
To represent the Present
(P-Time) in a geometrical way, imagine if one second were the distance of the
Earth from the Sun, the Present would not even be visible with the best
microscope in the world. It is not so surprising that we can miss billions of
temporal quantas every second.
It is with this that the importance of
psychological time can be realized, the same as with dreams, a state
signifying a vibratory increase.
It is essential to understand that every
quantum of time is a bearer of
information in the space-time that it occupies. The energy and the "messages"
that are there are going to circulate from quantum to quantum, making bigger
jumps in weaker densities. The more the quantas are spaced out (low
frequencies) the more the law of cause and effect will prevail (as with
karma). That is why quantum physics, in certain circumstances does not know
what is the effect or the cause of quantum states with the same name.
established on very high frequencies, and circulating far enough towards one
or the other arrows of time (direction), as a part of ourselves is able to
do, we can see the past (distant memory) or the future… just as UFOs
This law of liberty explains not only the difference between nature worlds
(mineral, vegetal, animal and human), but also the confrontation between
science and spirituality. Do we not say that there are "hard", or
"pure" sciences (very reliable=less freedom) and "soft", or "human" sciences
(more uncertain = high freedom)
By simultaneously increasing energy in two different time densities, there
are proportionally more temporal quantas missing in the lower time density.
The universe, in all its realities, is a succession of ranges of frequencies
corresponding to different densities of time (so, different space-times).
ACT V: UFOS AND OTHER MYSTERIES EXPLAINED
Concerning more particularly UFOs, we will try to explain them in the light
of 3-D Time. Here is an incomplete list of additional effects that may find
a new global coherence.
The prodigious accelerations are illusory: the unit of time changes.
Not only the acceleration of
UFOs, seen from the outside, is an illusion due
to a differential of temporal density, but it is also an imaginary reduction
of its size, giving us even more so the impression that they are far away.
Would they decrease to the size of a ball of light in a crop circle?
The observations vary from ghostly to very material:
the state of matter
UFOs disappear on the spot: the rotation of the rotor expands time without
The environment undergoes a 'sucking up' (lifting) phenomenon: a strong local
gravity takes place.
Photos of UFOs are often vague: intermediate density of time.
UFOs are furtive: radar detection depends on immediate materiality.
Perception of dimensions is relative: vessels are bigger inside and smaller
outside. ETs vary in size according to their appropriate density.
The saucer shape is the most efficient: economy of matter is determined by
the radius of the ring.
A beam of light attracts objects: the gravitational beam is guided by a
UFOs change shape: the 4 states exist at the same time in the craft.
Witnesses are attracted by a light which then gets bigger: moment
which precedes the materialization.
ETs can choose the witnesses: a psychic emission inhibits perceptions and
conversely. (Perceptions can be enhanced)
Some abductees have missing time: the
missing Time is no other than a
different time density.
Microwave traces are often found in places of
UFO landings. They signify a
materialization. With adequate means, we could maybe measure X-rays and gamma
rays of the luminous sightings: the physical traces depend on the phase of
We can, of course apply 3-D Time to paranormal phenomena.
Telepathy : transfer of psychic waves to a temporal level giving the
appearance of simultaneity.
Speed of thought: a part of ourselves is situated in another density of time.
Ghosts and ectoplasms: intermediate states of temporal density.
Dreams: change of density during the night. The dreams seem extremely short
and contain nevertheless many details.
Retro precognition : break of partial temporal density and sliding along the
axis of direction.
Telekinesis and poltergeists: variation of the density in the environment.
Science also has its mysteries. Here are a few suggestions.
Loss of information from black holes: high gravity rhymes with high temporal
Arbitrary nature of physical constants: they are valid only in our density.
Very weak gravity compared to the other forces: proportional to the temporal
Heisenberg's uncertainty: impossibility to measure the position and also the
quantity of movement of a particle because of a break of the flow of time in
Inseparability of particles: paradox between the experience of thought
(Einstein-Podolski-Rosen), confirmed by the theorem of Bell, and the
experience of Aspect demonstrating the counter intuitive nature of quantum
mechanics. The quantas of non-visible time pass on the information of the
particle properties in the form of waves.
Disappearance of particles in particle accelerators: these partially
the role of the torus of UFOs. Particles disappear towards the geometrical
centre of the particle accelerators (density of time+gravity).
This list of elements can be completed at your leisure. There are things
which don't come to mind easily. So, all those who are interested in the
that govern the universe or if they are not yet convinced or if they are
simply curious can meditate upon it in order to attempt another excursion out
of the matrix, for there is nothing more extraordinary than to experience it
PROOF OF EVIDENCE
I reply to a person who contacted me after reading the document above. He
asked what proof or evidence could be found to illustrate the theory
For the question of proof and evidence, I have given a few ideas at the end
of the article – mentioning black holes, particle accelerators
enigmas. Our problem today is that we are limited, if I remember well, to a
time scale of 10-15 second to observe the infinitely small (we are waiting
for 10-18 sec. laser beams to be developed), and we even interpret what we
'see' without being sure of the pertinence of the interpretation. You know as
I do that the time of Planck (10-43second) is a mathematical deduction. We
are therefore only halfway there, so to speak.
The problem with the interpretation of gravity in the infinitely small, based
on general relativity, comes from the fact that the scales are very different
in terms of 'distance' and also in number of atoms.
The difference in scale between gravity and the other interactions (1040
higher for strong interactions), is surprising and is a problem. If, as I
suppose, the reduction in distance between the nucleus and electronic levels
really generates gravity, until we are better informed, we are incapable of
measuring this distance in our quantum experiments since it is difficult to
provoke this 'compression' (reduction of electronic distances) and at the
same time measure this gravitational distance because of the explosive method
used (high energy laser beam bombarding an atom). We neither have the means
nor the time to do it (phenomena too fast).
However, according to some,
we should be able to verify it or not, with the future LHCof the
(particle accelerator), if mini black holes appear under certain conditions.
As I see it, it would be useful to study the theory of Dr. Ning Lee of l'UAH
(Alabama) that shows the apparition of antigravity phenomena in spinning
electromagnetic fields, and also Dr Podkletnov's experiment, even if
controversial, which gave an idea of it (loss of 2% of the mass of 'objects'
found above a rotor producing a spinning field.).
In fact, to my mind, antigravity is a differential of gravity comparative to
the mass involved (number of atoms) and not an 'opposing' force. In any case,
what is a space-time anti-curvature ?
Quantum mechanics gives us intuitive proof of the existence of 'non apparent'
quantas of time (supposed to be in very high time densities) on a plate. The
whole QM is built on a basic principle: state functions attribute discrete
states (spin, charge and mass) to particles, i.e. jumps in their state. It is
precisely the definition of quantum states. Has anyone ever explained these
discontinuities ? No, we are content to observe them. What happens between
two quantum states, which, at the same time bring about spatial modifications? Nobody knows!
I sense that it is here, that the dematerialization of matter happens -
instantaneous certainly - but dematerialization just the same.
When you consider this apparent 'absurdity' and our temporary inability
(let's hope so) to 'see' below 10-15 second (to be converted in wavelengths),
you can also deduce that matter BECOMES INVISIBLE because it dematerializes,
while the wave-like nature of matter keeps the 'memory' of the particle
properties (theory of super-cords and inseparability of particles). We will
see further on how the coherence of atomic structures is conserved even in
the case of dematerialization.
From this comes the idea that UFOs, are
transformed from particle to wave,
once a certain rate of time flow is reached at the periphery of the rotor!
The emission of a breaking frequency that I spoke of in the previous article,
describing access to invisibility, i.e. to dematerialization, would be the
missing key. It should be born in mind that for me, invisibility, as for
light, does not mean that matter has totally disappeared but that it has lost
its mass and consequently, there is no inertia which prevents high speeds.
This breaking frequency should be found, with the necessary energy, a little
below (in terms of wavelength) the threshold of present 'visibility', meaning
when converted into frequencies, around 100,000 gigahertz, as we will see. It
is interesting to note that light, which has a frequency between 4 and 7.5
1014 hz, happens to be at the limit of what we see of the infinitely small
today. Now, I state in the article that the third state of matter is
luminescent before invisibility (the first being stable, the second being
unstable). Before concluding anything as such, or getting carried away with
such an easy temptation, we have to imagine the frequency of a rotor spinning
at very high speed.
Besides the fact that this rotor isn't braked by its
environment (vacuum chamber), besides the fact that purely inert gyroscopic
effects hold it in an extremely stable spatial referential, inducing even
within itself an 'antigravity' phenomenon (Frisbee effect), besides the fact
that there is no contact with any other matter in its centre since it would
be emptied (pointless and even the existence of constraints in the case of a
full hub), besides the fact that it produces electromagnetic fields at high
energy, the rotor is a marvelous emitter of frequencies.. relayed by the
Let us make a hypothesis. A rotor diameter of 5 meters, the circumference is
15.7 meters. At 3000 000 000 meters/second (speed of light), the supposed
speed limit (we will speak of the dilemma of infinite energy for an infinite
mass later on), our frequency is about 19 megahertz (or 19 million
rotations/second). It is extremely weak in terms of frequency but very high
Remember that Podkeltnov's rotor turned at 5000 rpm, that is 230 000 times
slower for a ten times smaller size. On the other hand, by doubling our rotor
by another which turns in the opposite direction and by having hundreds of
segments of radial magnets on the two rotors one on top of the other, the
radial magnets having a thickness for example of one centimeter in
circumference, we obtain: 15700x19=298300 Mhz that we multiply again by
15700(second rotor) that is a frequency of: 4683310000 Ghz, i.e. nearly 4.6
million gigahertz. That is one bit of information every 4.6 10-18 second.
You 'just' need to reduce this figure by a factor of a hundred (i.e. 1% of
the speed of light) to realize that we reach ten times our present
observation limit. Therefore, our progress in means of measurements
will rapidly confirm or invalidate this hypothesis of material disappearance
and prove the reality of time quantas. And since we are only at 1% of the
speed of light, the energy needed doesn't greatly increase the mass of atoms
of the rotor. The explosion of the rotor, that could be envisaged due to
the centrifugal force thus generated, could be avoided by the structure
itself (purity), of the material used and the action of the torus spoken of
Finally, according to my vision, with the atoms transforming into
waves after a certain vibratory threshold (see above for the breaking
frequency), the corpuscular nature of atoms no longer has to be maintained as
it is, and this happening progressively from the periphery to the centre of
the rotor as it accelerates (the rotor would therefore diminish before your
eyes), at the same time, emitting a powerful light (what we see in the centre
of the underside of saucers).
For the rest of the craft, we can suppose that the crystal (type of quartz)
aligns the harmonic frequencies. It is understood, and you must not forget
that by increasing the frequencies, you increase the appearance of time
quantas in the theory that we are interested in, increasing at the same time
the mass of accessible information, and consequently the energy which is more
immediately available and which is linked to it, knowing, once again
that space contracts at the same time (present dilemma of the observation of
the infinitely small). The most annoying, it must be confessed, is that the
more you look into the infinitely small, precisely the more it becomes so
(equivalence space vs. time).
This leads us to the Fermi paradox.
He was absolutely right in opposing the
idea of the hypothesis of the presence of extraterrestrials on Earth, coming
from the confines of the universe, with those insurmountable distances of the
cosmos, so long as we remain enclosed in a non-compressible space reference.
According to this paradox, either the ETs are already here, or they can't in
any way be here. In the first case, we would have already seen them, which
doesn't seem to be the case for him. In the light of absolute relativity
according to which, information structures space-time and vice versa, space
contracts as the density of time increases. For ETs, the universe is
'ridiculously' small if they 'greatly' expand time. I imagine that they can't
all do so, through all the scales of expansion.. which would explain, among
other things, their very different behaviors (they are not all to be put in
the same boat).
They can only appear to us if they decide to, i.e. only if they change
space-time by reducing their time density. This reduction can only be done at
the cost of a considerable loss of time quantas and therefore of information
by, you guessed, a negative acceleration of the rotor. Their materialization
is therefore a form of 'sacrifice' of their degree of freedom (this term is
often attributed to avatars).
One can understand why they don't rush to shake
our hands, in case we put theirs in handcuffs. Yet it is, I believe,
what they accept to do (sacrifice time quantas) to take 'samples' that are more easily observed by this means, or more rarely, for direct physical
contacts with those whom they know that there is no or little risk (psychic
and behavior studies). The less 'clever' among them are no doubt 'caught
out' by being seen sometimes. It's a strong bet that the easiest thing for
them is to capture our psychic signals (high frequencies) and remain
comfortably 'there' where they are. (Sorry for this digression).
To come back to astronomical distances, that are reputed to be
insurmountable, the Fermi paradox is probably the most simple among paradoxes
to be challenged and understood since these distances (universe 15 billions
(U.S.) light years away) have no value except in our space-time (see the
theory of reversed triangles where, 'the more time there is, the less space'). We have known since 1905 (limited relativity) that space and time
By introducing three-dimensional time, the impact on
space-time geometry is obvious, and the notion of time quantas clarifies this
relation: for each appearance of a time quantum, a spatial 'quantum'
disappears (for this idea must also be introduced). We could express this by
tQ (time quantum) and sQ (space quantum). Then we would have an equation like:
S tQ=1/S sQ.
And inversely, like the relation that unites frequency and
wavelength. This isn't quite true in the sense that there is discontinuity.
Therefore, this relation can only be valid in a discrete function
(discontinuous), (see the initial text). In this case, we would have a
limit, where S is the sum, Sx tQ> 1/Sy eQ, where x and y are two signs of
maximum space-time considered. Systematically, we would define the Sx1,2.. n
tQ and the Sy1,2…n sQ where n would be a particular space-time.
This new type of algebra must, it is true, be examined by math's experts.
We said that the universe is fractal (scales of space without linear
transitions). It's interesting, at least, to link the variations of space and
time in each space-time. We could actually use the term "tension" for the
phenomena, where, in a particular space-time, we see a variation of time quantas, and its consequences in mass/energy, in a same spatial referential
(like the one that we study in classical physics), or inversely with a same
number of time quantas for a variation of space.
It's like this that we have
the notions of potential and kinetic energies belonging to each space-time
(celestial mechanics, classical mechanics, biology, chemistry, electronics,
etc.). It would probably be extremely tempting to compare this notion of
"tension" within the same space-time to that of Einstein's "tensor" which
would immediately see its applications multiplied by as many discontinuous
I would just like to mention the nature of antimatter
that many see as the
ideal energetic manna from heaven. Like Richard Feynman, a physicist, who saw
in antimatter the expression of matter going backwards in time (reversed
arrow of time), I think this idea is quite probable.
Feynman has, it is true, since changed his mind. However, he didn't know the
three-dimensional theory of time very well to which we can add the following
idea: beyond a certain flow of time (time density), the quantas
are so close
to each other (because very numerous) that the information could circulate in
the opposite direction to the natural arrow of time in our space-time. This
reversed flow of information (mass/energy) 'normally' happens in the form of
waves, non-materialized by particles. There seems to be a boundary state of
matter, that is coherent and capable of going backwards like this in time. It
is very brief (they speak of a millionth of a second).
Just as an electric current that flows, not physically (the electrons only
move very little) but in a wave-like manner (transmission of shocks), the
information (of the states of matter) can flow against the current, and be
compared to thermodynamic entropic sub-millimetric fluctuations.
We all know that below certain values,
cause and effect are indiscernible in Quantum Mechanics, in other words, the flow of time, when it is very dense,
is going to influence the order of appearance of phenomena without being in
any way in contradiction with classical laws for they don't belong to the
same space-time. In classical mechanics, time quantas are very spaced out and
matter follows defined laws.
On the other hand, in QM, matter follows
undefined laws, but.. statistical laws. We must remember that QMlogic
counter-intuitive. Once three-dimensional time logic is accepted, its effects
will be largely obvious. As a result, QM becomes more intuitive again,
especially if we add the notion of transport of information dear to Austrian
In this way, therefore, I make the hypothesis that electronic and proton
charges of our space-time could reflect the arrow of time, the arrow that is
followed by matter in some space-times including ours that are restricted by
a too great a lack of time quantas, (counted in billions).
One could thus suppose, in a first estimate, that antimatter is the
expression of matter that goes in the opposite direction, and that one can
only control in a powerful electromagnetic field which prevents "two trains
from crashing on the same line", the magnetic field itself not having much to
do with time. It should be noted that the production of antimatter, which is
in any case famous for its furtiveness, is ridiculously weak compared to the
surrounding matter (the record seems to be only 50,000 atoms of antimatter
when there are billions of billions around it.
When matter meets antimatter, it produces a colossal amount of energy, since
in my opinion, it corresponds to the instantaneous compression of two
space-times going in different directions (arrow of time) that annihilate
themselves. One could say that it's the energy of the Present, which, when it
is reduced usually to a single time quantum (when the wave passes by its
neutral phase), is very weak, or too fast (here, as well).
In the case
of antimatter, we could be dealing with packets of materialized Present, from the fact that a relatively great number of quantas (which usually flow one
after the other) meet instantaneously, since in an opposite manner. In other
terms, they are two vectors of energy (admissible in 3-D time) which crash
headlong into each other.
Antimatter could be present in the torus of
UFOs! Protected by a powerful
electromagnetic field, even in a small quantity, it would orbit at a
vertiginous speed and would serve two functions:
maintain the temporal coherence of the particles of the ship (the function
of a particle accelerator).
maintain the waves, inside the ship, once the matter has
"dematerialized", forcing them to perform 'on the spot' rather than lose
themselves in space or in the atmosphere. This phenomena could be explained
by a "reverse" aligning of the harmonics of the matter waves with
the antimatter waves (the sinusoids are mixed up, some in one direction,
others in another.) Being contained within the craft, the particular
properties of these waves would be controlled. I admit that this aspect of
things is very speculative for the moment as it is one hypothesis on top of
Whatever the case, the issue of antimatter is a question of where it comes
from. The most exotic theories exist, for example that of parallel
universes, that would be "elsewhere", but where? This vision of opposite
arrows of time seems to me to correspond to a coherent logic of the
intrinsic nature of a multi-dimensional universe that contains our own, and
doesn't put off indefinitely the discovery of other worlds, that are
inaccessible by definition.
Binary charges (positive/negative) correspond perfectly to the duality of
the Direction of time (Dir-Time="from the past to the future" and "from the
future to the past"). I think that the universe is very coherent and that
scientific understanding is not an empty notion. The dual
three-dimensionality of space and time seems to me to belong to the genius
of Nature and what we are invited to participate in.
In conclusion, I could say that matter is a "simple" affair of space-time
and energy-mass. Four pillars of the foundation of the universe!
The final question could be: what is the fifth element ?