by Laura Knight
The subject of COINTELPRO comes up quite a bit on our websites and
has done so since we became fully aware of its activity in the
various "alternative news/views" movements back in late 2001. Up to
that point in time, we were thinking that it was probably likely
that, now and again, a group might be infiltrated by an agent for a
specific purpose. What we were NOT aware of was the vast,
overarching program that seems to be in place for the primary
purpose of controlling absolutely everything via the control of the
minds of the masses!
Yeah, thatís a pretty unbelievable project to contemplate, but for
groups with unlimited resources and the agenda to stay on the top of
the heap, itís really not so hard. And never has this activity been
more evident than in the 9/11 Truth Movement which I want to discuss
here. But, before getting to that specifically, let me give a little
Some time ago I published an article entitled "Cosmic
which said, in part:
UFOs and the National Security State
is the first comprehensive study of the
past 50 years of the U.S. Governmentís response to the intrusion
of UFO phenomena in America. The compiled evidence - which
includes government documents - suggests that a group of
specialists working in the shadows, set up and executed the most
massive cover-up in the history of government; and that the
Human Potential movement and the subsequent
New Age movements,
were key elements of this cover-up. In other words, they not
only have used the ďcolorful communityĒ of alternative ideas as
an unwitting tool of disinformation, it is highly probable that
most of it was literally created by them as COINTELPRO.
By the mid-1940s, Americaís
intelligence apparatus had reason to believe that there were
artifacts in the skies that did not originate from America,
Russia, Germany, or any other country. These objects
violated some highly sensitive military airspace, and did
not appear to be natural phenomena.
One may presume that the
affected national security authorities made it an immediate
obsession to determine the nature and purpose of these
objects, and we may infer that the issue probably became a
deep secret by 1946, or 1947 at the latest.
It was at this precise moment in time that the so-called
Human Potential movement was ďborn.Ē
Do we think that this was a coincidence?
By the mid-50s, it was becoming obvious that things were getting out
of control and in August of 1956, the FBI began its COINTELPRO
operation. When traditional modes of repression (exposure, blatant
harassment, and prosecution for political crimes) failed to counter
the growing insurgency, and even helped to fuel it, the Bureau took
the law into its own hands. Its methods ranged far beyond
surveillance, and amounted to a domestic version of the covert
action for which the CIA has become infamous throughout the world.
Usually, when we think of COINTELPRO, we think of the most well
known and typical activities which include sending anonymous or
fictitious letters designed to start rumors, among other things,
publishing false defamatory or threatening information, forging
signatures on fake documents, introducing disruptive and subversive
members into organizations to destroy them from within, blackmailing
insiders in any group to force them to spread false rumors, or to
foment factionalism, and so on.
What a lot of people donít keep in mind is the fact that
also concentrated on creating bogus organizations.
bogus groups could serve many functions which might include
attacking and/or disrupting bona fide groups, or even just simply
creating a diversion with clever propaganda in order to attract
members away so as to involve them with time-wasting activity
designed to prevent them from doing anything useful. COINTELPRO was
also famous for instigation of hostile actions through third parties
so that it looked like just a "disagreement" between two individuals
or groups, a "food fight" or something, and there was no way to
connect it to any government operation.
Now, let us take a few logical steps. The
UFO problem emerged into
the national consciousness in 1947, or thereabouts. Not long
afterward, a lot of people began asking a lot of questions. The
government wasnít answering, and so the people began to band
together to find out the answers for themselves. They started
forming groups. And this is where things get just a bit curious. The
thing that was most threatened by the UFO/alien issue seems to have
been the Standard Monotheistic Religions. Religion seems to be a
necessary component of political control.
Social control - that is
the mainstay of religion - was most definitely under threat. In
fact, what seems to be true is that it is not even clear that
religions - as we know them - would have survived a full disclosure.
So the logical conclusion is that part of the main reason for the
cover-up was to ďprotect the religious status quo Ē - or to create a
new "religion" by which masses of people could be controlled.
As things stood at the time, protecting the religious status quo -
mainly the social controls that stem from religion - was iffy at
best. After a century of scholarly investigation into many religious
texts, and the raising of many questions about the ďold time
religion,Ē there were a lot of people in society who were most
definitely turning away from religious dogma. Itís fairly simple to
take the next logical step and see that a combining of the questions
of those who were disenchanted with religion, with the questions of
those who wanted to know just what the heck was going on in terms of
possible ďextraterrestrials,Ē was seen as a dangerous and explosive
to be done.
The activities of COINTELPRO in attempting to neutralize political
opposition have been pretty well exposed. But we are now considering
the fact that, in addition to political activists, it seems that
COINTELPRO has particularly targeted groups that are seeking the
truth about the interactions between the US government and
Terrestrials, or so-called ďaliens.Ē That a long-time cover-up of
these matters has been in effect is certainly evident to any careful
The COINTELPRO files show the U.S. Government targeted a very broad
range of religious, labor and community groups opposed to any of its
agendas, and it is only logical to assume that the same type of
operation would be created to cover up the ďalien agenda.Ē Such a
theoretical COINTELPRO operation also goes far in explaining why,
when the sincere researcher of UFO phenomena enters this field, he
or she discovers only lies, lies, and more lies; confusion and
disinformation. That is most definitely the signature of COINTELPRO.
Considering all of this, would anybody care to suggest that it did
not also occur to the Powers that Be that the chief means of
diverting attention and covering up the truth would be to literally
fund and create the ďNew AgeĒ and ďHuman Potential movement" so that
it would follow their agenda of keeping secrets? So that it would
create a New Religion of Aliens that THEY controlled?
In other words, it is extremely likely that the most successful and
popular of Metaphysical Mavens and New Age Impresarios are
COINTELPRO agents - either conscious or dupes of those who are. The
objective seems to be to attack and ďneutralizeĒ those who are
seeking the answers. Those who are sincere, who do bona fide
research and seek to explicate the truth, are infiltrated, attacked,
and marginalized according to standard COINTELPRO procedures.
What all of this seems to suggest is that the Powers That Be (PTB)
have developed COINTELPRO to an all new level of Social Shaping,
Cultural Brainwashing, and the main targets of this activity would
include virtually anyone who is seeking the truth about the shifting
realities of our world. The cases of COINTELPRO activities against
political groups must be no more than the tip of the iceberg, given
that the great bulk of COINTELPRO-type operations remain secret
until long after their damage has been done. By all indications,
domestic covert operations have become a permanent feature of U.S.
politics and Social Programming, and it is hardly likely,
considering the evidence, that the New Age and Human Potential
fields are exempt.
The implications of this are truly alarming. Those who manage to get
close to the truth of these matters, despite the many obstacles in
their path, face National covert campaigns to discredit and disrupt
their research and reputations. Clearly, COINTELPRO and similar
operations under other names also work to distort academic and
popular perceptions of the problems facing our world. They have done
enormous damage to the search for the Truth.
ďTerrorism is changing. New
adversaries, new motivations and new rationales have surfaced in
recent years to challenge much of the conventional wisdom...Ē
wrote Dr. Bruce Hoffman, Director of RAND.
And he was right. The only problem is,
the reader is largely unaware of the definition of ďnew adversariesĒ
that might be implied in his remarks.
I think that it is pretty easy to "read" the
9/11 Truth Movement
into the above description of COINTELPRO in the "New Age." In fact,
after all that practice, it must have been a piece of cake to just
move in and co-opt those who were suddenly drawn into an
"alternative" point of view by 9/11. A lot of people who have
absolutely no interest in metaphysics, religion, and so forth, DO
have an interest in politics and history and current affairs. Iíll
never forget reading John Kaminskiís article "Agents Provocateur?"
where he describes where he was and what he was doing at that
fateful moment on September 11, 2001:
I remember that day all too well. I was standing in front of my TV.
I had just awakened and flipped it on, intending to zap the clicker
to ESPN to catch the latest sports news, a typical daily habit that
occurs just before I stumble into the kitchen to make my coffee. By
chance, the tube was set to NBC, where the plastic Today show
commentators were talking about a plane that had crashed into the
World Trade Center. So I never changed the channel. I just stood
there, eyelids glued apart, and watched as plane number two glided
into the south tower, and into history.
I just stood there, I donít know for how long. Eventually I turned
around, made the coffee, and listened to the aghast commentary of
the NBC crew. I donít remember now what it was triggered my next
verbal outburst, whether it was Katie Couric reporting the
government saying it was Osama bin Laden who was behind the attacks,
or some vaguer speculation about Arab terrorists.
I only know I turned around, stalked into the living room, and then
with the most certain self-assured vehemence I have ever shown in my
life, started bellowing: "No way! No freaking way!"
I knew then, right then and there, that 9/11 was an inside job. ...
Nothing I have seen, heard, or read since has caused me to feel even
the merest shadow of a doubt about what I felt at that moment.
There are millions of people who had the same reaction, but very few
of them in a position, or with the talents, to say or do anything
about it. And most of them are not into "metaphysics, religion, or
researching strange phenomena." Thatís too bad. Thereís a lot about
COINTELPRO that we all could learn together.
Now, one of the interesting things we have observed about COINTELPRO
is the way it shifts and warps in response to possible exposure. I
believe that I was the first to realize the extent and nature of the
operation, and I began publishing my speculations about it in the
Adventures With Cassiopaea series back in early 2002. Not too long
after that, individuals that I KNEW to be "agents" of COINTELPRO
began to start ranting about COINTELPRO and pointing the finger this
way and that way. Up to this point in time, the lid had pretty much
remained shut on the subject - I guess they were hoping that people
would forget about it, or think that it was over and done with back
in the 70s, nothing to worry about now!
But nope, I saw it and wrote about it and they just had to do
something. So, in typical COINTELPRO fashion, they started producing
endless noise to obscure the signal. Particular attention was paid
to me; I guess I had to be punished for daring to call a spade a
spade. I was accused of being COINTELPRO myself, of being funded by
George Soros, my husband was accused of being an "ex cold war nuke
scientist," and the previous attacks that had alerted me to the
COINTELPRO problem to begin with - vile and vicious defamation,
character assassination, and so on - ramped up to an unbelievable
As usual, I learned a lot by observing and doing research to find
out who was connected to whom.
Of course, once I began publishing such exposes, the program shifted
again. The internet was already being scrubbed of articles and
stories that did not support the government 9/11 claims that had
been published in the early days after 9/11. Seems like some
additional scrubbing took place in removing material that might link
various agents together. Additionally, such resources as the "whois"
services became useless with the use of "proxy registration" of
Many things that had been on the web before 9/11 suddenly
disappeared. Many things also disappeared from the usually reliable
web-archive as well. In some instances, we had the foresight to
archive pages, but not always. I even have some pages archived and
certified in my files. They may come in handy someday.
With over 100 researchers in our Quantum Future Group, scattered
around the globe, we have even resorted to sending a member out to
do hand searches in various places. In one case, the member was
shortly afterward visited by some "Israeli Art Students." Howís that
for "personal attention?"
Not long after I published research findings on the people behind
GodlikeProductions Forum, we received an email warning, and two
"personal contacts" of a threatening nature. Let us just say that
when you begin to find connections between such popular websites and
drug and pedophile rings, you are cruising into dangerous
international trafficking waters and discretion may very well be the
better part of valor. I removed the article from our website, though
I do still send it to researchers who ask for it privately.
note, while on the subject, that this is not uncommon: to find such
connections; after all, thatís one of the ways that secret agencies
make their money - drugs and human trafficking, including children -
and have the means to control government officials: blackmail. Itís
a pretty handy set-up: provide the drugs and the sex, get photos and
movies or recordings, and voila! Instant control of just about
So, while I canít take the risk of telling exactly who is who here,
just let me give a general warning:
drugs and pedophilia - and even
arms trafficking - are connected to a lot of people who you would
never, ever suspect! Imagine!
A popular New Age teacher giving
seminars on such things as how to create your higher astral body and
meet your angel guides (for example) who also runs a cover operation
for shipping arms to CIA sponsored guerilla groups and ALSO has
programs for "special children"?
Can we say "Star kids" and
Getting back to
9/11 and COINTELPRO in that venue: if you donít
already know that probably 80 to 90 percent of what is out there is
noise, then you might want to get up to speed pretty fast.
Now, letís get down to some specifics. Thereís a new guy on the 9/11
scene who just sort of appeared out of nowhere: Daryl Bradford
Daryl has declared himself to be the "Black Mamba" of the
Well, I DO declare! Hush my mouth and shiver my timbers!
Iíve been watching Mr. Smith (funny, that reminds me Agent Smith in
The Matrix!) for a bit now. Among his earlier publications was a
sort of "how to recognize agents in the 9/11 Truth Movement guide".
It was simple, straightforward, easy for anyone to understand. Even
though something about it was disturbing, I included it on Signs of
the Times one day.
Recently, I had an exchange with a few other 9/11 researchers on the
subject of DBS, and Iíd like to share a few excerpts:
Daryl is telling us he has commandeered the 9/11 skeptics movement.
Hoo boy! Well, Iíve got this handy little booklet here entitled "How
to Spot a Spy," which was put together back during the days of the
"Global Movement for Justice and Eco-Peace," when
running rampant and some of those groups learned the hard way. It
was sent to me by a member of QFG (thanks DS) Iíve been thinking
about updating it and making it available to 9/11 researchers. Here
is what it says, mainly, synopsized and skipping some repetitive
One way to neutralize a potential activist is to get them to be in a
group that does all the wrong things. Why?
1) The message
doesnít get out
2) A lot of time is
3) The activist is
frustrated and discouraged
4) Nothing good is
FBI and Police Informers and
Infiltrators will infest any group and they have phoney activist
Their purpose is to prevent any real
movement for justice or eco-peace from developing in this
Agents come in small, medium or
large. They can be of any ethnic background. They can be male or
The actual size of the group or
movement being infiltrated is irrelevant. It is the potential
the movement has for becoming large which brings on the spies
This booklet lists tactics agents
use to slow things down, foul things up, destroy the movement
and keep tabs on activists.
It is the agentís job to keep the
activist from quitting such a group, thus keeping him/her under
In some situations, to get control, the
agent will tell the activist:
"Youíre dividing the movement."
[Here, I have added the psychological
reasons as to WHY this maneuver works to control people]
This invites guilty feelings. Many people can be
guilt. The agents begin relationships with activists behind a
well-developed mask of "dedication to the cause." Because of their
often declared dedication, (and actions designed to prove this),
when they criticize the activist, he or she - being truly dedicated
to the movement - becomes convinced that somehow, any issues are
This is because a truly dedicated person tends to
believe that everyone has a conscience and that nobody would
dissimulate and lie like that "on purpose." Itís amazing how far
agents can go in manipulating an activist because the activist will
constantly make excuses for the agent who regularly declares their
dedication to the cause. Even if they do, occasionally, suspect the
agent, they will pull the wool over their own eyes by rationalizing:
"they did that unconsciously... they didnít really mean it... I can
help them by being forgiving and accepting " and so on and so forth.
The agent will tell the activist:
"Youíre a leader!"
This is designed to enhance the
activistís self-esteem. His or her narcissistic admiration of
his/her own activist/altruistic intentions increase as he or she
identifies with and consciously admires the altruistic declarations
of the agent which are deliberately set up to mirror those of the
This is "malignant pseudoidentification." It is the process by which
the agent consciously imitates or simulates a certain behavior to
foster the activistís identification with him/her, thus increasing
the activistís vulnerability to exploitation. The agent will
simulate the more subtle self-concepts of the activist.
Activists and those who have altruistic self-concepts are most
vulnerable to malignant pseudoidentification especially during work
with the agent when the interaction includes matter relating to
their competency, autonomy, or knowledge.
The goal of the agent is to increase the activistís general empathy
for the agent through pseudo-identification with the activistís
The most common example of this is the agent who will compliment the
activist for his competency or knowledge or value to the movement.
On a more subtle level, the agent will simulate affects and
mannerisms of the activist which promotes identification via
mirroring and feelings of "twinship". It is not unheard of for
activists, enamored by the perceived helpfulness and competence of a
good agent, to find themselves considering ethical violations and
perhaps, even illegal behavior, in the service of their
The activistís "felt quality of perfection" [self-concept] is
enhanced, and a strong empathic bond is developed with the agent
through his/her imitation and simulation of the victimís own
narcissistic investments. [self-concepts] That is, if the activist
knows, deep inside, their own dedication to the cause, they will
project that onto the agent who is "mirroring" them.
The activist will be deluded into thinking that the agent shares
this feeling of identification and bonding. In an activist/social
movement setting, the adversarial roles that activists naturally
play vis a vis the establishment/government, fosters ongoing
processes of intrapsychic splitting so that "twinship alliances"
between activist and agent may render whole sectors or reality
testing unavailable to the activist. They literally "lose touch with
Activists who deny their own narcissistic investments [do not have a
good idea of their own self-concepts and that they ARE concepts] and
consciously perceive themselves (accurately, as it were) to be
"helpers" endowed with a special amount of altruism are exceedingly
vulnerable to the affective (emotional) simulation of the
Empathy is fostered in the activist through the expression of quite
visible affects. The presentation of tearfulness, sadness, longing,
fear, remorse, and guilt, may induce in the helper-oriented activist
a strong sense of compassion, while unconsciously enhancing the
activistís narcissistic investment in self as the embodiment of
The agentís expression of such simulated affects may be quite
compelling to the observer and difficult to distinguish from deep
It can usually be identified by two events, however:
First, the activist who has analyzed
his/her own narcissistic roots and is aware of his/her own
potential for being "emotionally hooked," will be able to remain
cool and unaffected by such emotional outpourings by the agent.
As a result of this unaffected, cool, attitude, the
will occur: The agent will recompensate much too quickly
following such an affective expression leaving the activist with
the impression that "the play has ended, the curtain has
fallen," and the imposture, for the moment, has finished. The
agent will then move quickly to another activist/victim.
The fact is, the movement doesnít need
leaders, it needs MOVERS. "Follow the leader" is a waste of time.
A good agent will want to meet as often as possible. He or she will
talk a lot and say little. One can expect an onslaught of long,
Some agents take on a pushy, arrogant, or defensive manner:
1) To disrupt the
2) To side-track the
3) To interrupt
4) To feign ignorance
5) To make an
unfounded accusation against a person
Calling someone a racist, for example.
This tactic is used to discredit a person in the eyes of all other
Some saboteurs pretend to be activists. She or he will ....
1) Write encyclopedic flyers (in
the present day, websites)
2) Print flyers in English only.
3) Have demonstrations in places
where no one cares.
4) Solicit funding from rich
people instead of grass roots support
5) Display banners with too many
words that are confusing.
6) Confuse issues.
7) Make the wrong demands.
8) Compromise the goal.
9) Have endless discussions that
waste everyoneís time.
The agent may accompany the endless
discussions with drinking, pot smoking or other amusement to slow
down the activistís work.
1) Want to establish "leaders"
to set them up for a fall in order to stop the movement.
2) Suggest doing foolish,
illegal things to get the activists in trouble.
3) Encourage militancy.
4) Want to taunt the
5) Attempt to make the activist
compromise their values.
6) Attempt to instigate
violence. Activism ought to always be non-violent.
7) Attempt to provoke revolt
among people who are ill-prepared to deal with the reaction
of the authorities to such violence.
1) Want everyone to sign up and
sing in and sign everything.
2) Ask a lot of questions
3) Want to know what events the
activist is planning to attend.
4) Attempt to make the activist
defend him or herself to identify his or her beliefs, goals,
and level of commitment.
Legitimate activists do not
subject people to hours of persuasive dialog. Their actions,
beliefs, and goals speak for themselves.
Groups that DO recruit are
missionaries, military, and fake political parties or
movements set up by agents.
ALWAYS assume that you are under
At this point, if you are NOT
under surveillance, you are not a very good activist!
They use them.
Such tactics include slander,
defamation, threats, getting close to disaffected or minimally
committed fellow activists to persuade them (via psychological
tactics described above) to turn against the movement and give false
testimony against their former compatriots. They will plant illegal
substances on the activist and set up an arrest; they will plant
false information and set up "exposure," they will send
incriminating letters [emails] in the name of the activist; and
more; they will do whatever society will allow.
This booklet in no way covers all the ways agents use to sabotage
the lives of sincere an dedicated activists.
If an agent is "exposed," he or she will be transferred or replaced.
COINTELPRO is still in operation today under a different code name.
It is no longer placed on paper where it can be discovered through
the freedom of information act.
The FBI counterintelligence programís stated purpose: To expose,
disrupt, misdirect, discredit, and otherwise neutralize individuals
who the FBI categorize as opposed to the National Interests.
"National Security" means the FBIís security from the people ever
finding out the vicious things it does in violation of peopleís
A slight breach in orthodoxy is sufficient to terrify authoritarian
ideologues who see in it the collapse of the system of thought
control that has been so effective in depoliticizing American
And thatís about it for the booklet: How To Spot a Spy!
Now, getting back to Daryl Bradford Smith and the above referenced
article where he claims that he is the "Black Mamba of the 9/11
Truth Movement," letís look at this article which seems to be
designed to implicate a Mr. Jon Carlson as a COINTELPRO agent.
First of all, I would have liked to have seen more facts about
Carlson and less "ranting." I donít know who Jon Carlson is and
didnít do anything to enlighten me except rant and rave and make
himself look foolish. However, I can certainly understand a tendency
to rant now and again out of sheer frustration.
Having said that, I think that it is dangerous to fall into a "itís
either black or white" judgment mode because that is what THEY do
and what THEY promote. In a sense, it is the difference between the
"good vs evil" via strict laws and NO justice (the psychopathic way)
as opposed to the more natural and human Law of Three which posits,
"there is good and there is evil and there is the specific situation
that determines which is which."
I know that the majority of people arenít interested in, or canít
deal with, concepts of metaphyisics, religion, hyperdimensional
manipulations, and so I was very glad to get the Ponerology material
because that "brings it home" to 3D. Even the guys at the truck
stop can understand how an evil government can come to power with
Nevertheless, there ARE many surpassingly strange things on this
planet and we need to have theories and explanations that
accommodate those things or we are no better than
church born out of materialistic Judaism which is the underpinning
philosophy that led to the mess we are in in the first place.
Judaism has been promoting the purely material, linear explanation
of reality for a very long time. And anybody who goes in a different
direction is immediately attacked and/or vectored. That fact should
give some pause to a serious thinker.
I want to try to explain what I mean here by commenting on Smithís
DBS writes: Can you see a
pattern with UFOs?
Steven Greer is very active in promoting
LKJ: I donít know if DBS has a particular reason for
naming Steven Greer or not. I think, based on what he says
further down, that his chief issue with Steven is that he is
Jewish. So what? My only beef with Steven Greer is that he
specifically promotes UFOs as ETs from outer space, i.e. distant
worlds, physical explanation, and that they are just "very
advanced" and therefore must be "here to help us." (You know, a
being canít be more advanced if they are not "good."
This is a
Now, first of all, let us understand that the mainstream media
of the United States is, by and large, controlled by Zionists.
So is the government. So, you can pretty well figure out that
what is being promoted by the media and or the government is
what the Zionists want you to believe.
And so, we come to the realization that the image of "aliens"
that is most widespread in the U.S. is, by default, the
explication that the Zionists WANT everyone to believe.
no way obviates the reality of the phenomenon. In fact, that the
phenomenon has received so much "smoke and mirrors" attention
should tell us that it is serious and real, and most definitely
NOT what the MSM presents.
DBS: # Stanton Friedman claims be one of the pioneers in UFO
LKJ: Iíve communicated with Friedman a few times over the years,
have met him personally, and I donít think that he is doing any
deliberate disinformation. He is sincere, works very hard, and
even though I donít agree with his approach - Stanton is another
one who is hard on the heels of finding a "material explanation"
for UFOs - that they are ETs from distant worlds in our
material, 3D universe, I donít question his integrity. At least
not at this point. He has never given any reason for anyone to
question it. So, I donít get DBSí point here unless - again -
his point is that Stanton Friedman is Jewish. If that is the
case, then we have a better idea of what DBS is up to.
DBS: # Art Bell has been promoting aliens and other ridiculous
ideas for years on his coast-to-coast radio show.
LKJ: Canít argue with the fact that Art Bell has been promoting
ridiculous ideas for years, but notice that this is fairly
typical of the whole ET/UFO situation: it is so obscured by
noise that the true signal is completely missed.
Years of digging through cases has convinced me that there IS a
signal but that the whole UFO/New Age approach is vectored by
If you look at the pattern of disinformation surrounding 9/11,
you will see exactly the same pattern of disinfo that surrounds
the whole UFO/ET issue. And once you see that, you can draw the
obvious conclusion that the noise exists for the very purpose of
obscuring the signal. There is, so to say, an ET 9/11 - the real
deal - and tons of "false research sites" promoting stupid
ideas, even outrageous claims that give the whole field a bad
So, either DBS has fallen for this disinfo regarding
UFOs and ETs in the same way that many people will be disgusted over
9/11 Truth movement because of similar activities of
disinformation artists within the 9/11 Truth movement, or DBS is
one of them. Is Art Bell also Jewish? I donít know. But maybe
that is DBSí point.
DBS: The pattern I see is that many of the people who are
actively promoting UFOs have strong ties to Israel, or to other
Zionists. How many real Jews promote UFOs?
LKJ: I fail to see what "real Jews" - or "not real" Jews - or
Jews at all - have to do with the subject here. It is certainly
true that the Zionist controlled media and the complicit Bush
Administration are largely responsible for the disinfo about
9/11... So, just think about that for a minute. Ask yourself why
the owners of the media would promote so much nonsense about
UFOs??? It is EXACTLY the same thing as why they promote so
much nonsense about 9/11!!! Because there IS a "real signal"
that has to be obscured!
Do you really think that if there was nothing to it that they
would spend so much time obscuring it with nonsense???
Do you think that if it was really a benevolent phenomenon that
they would spend so much time trying to present it as one???
But none of that has anything to do with being Jewish.
DBS: Can you figure it out?
LKJ: Question is, can DBS figure it out. It looks like
fallen into the disinfo, smoke and mirrors trap, or... he is
part of it. One thing is certain: he is promoting hate.
DBS: These UFO researchers claim to be truth seekers who want
the government to stop lying about aliens, but they lie to us
about Israelís role in 9/11, the attack on the USS Liberty, the
assassination of President Kennedy, and other crimes.
LKJ: Iím not exactly sure what DBS is trying to say here. Is he
saying that the government lies about aliens AND 9/11 and the
attack on the Liberty, AND the assassination of JFK, therefore,
somehow he concludes that this proves his point? (Which it
OR, is he saying that UFO researchers who want the government to
stop lying about aliens then turn around and lie themselves
about 9/11, JFK, etc... ?
I donít really hang out with the "Aliens are here to save us"
gang, Jewish or not, so Iím a bit in the dark on who he is
talking about here. Everyone I know who is a so-called "UFO
researcher" knows quite well,
that Israel played a big role in
that MOSSAD was behind the USS Liberty attack
that JFK was not assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald
But, in the event that there ARE "UFO researchers" who subscribe
to the government disinfo campaign about JFK and 9/11, and other
things, I will point out that this just demonstrates how
effective COINTELPRO can be. Many, many people have had
experiences that make them desperate for an explanation, for a
"shelter" from the government instigated ridicule and denial.
That makes them RIPE to be taken in by someone who claims to
represent a "strange- phenomena- friendly port in the storm."
And THEN, once they have "anchored" in that port, they are
susceptible to being influenced by the other ideas. It is
DBS: Also, they lie to us about the role of the media, the
banking families, and the Mossad, and they lie about the
creation of Israel.
LKJ: Again, itís a bit hard to follow DBSí argument. Who is
lying? The Government or UFO researchers? I think he means UFO
researchers - specifically Jewish UFO researchers - in which
case, again, he ought to be more specific because I certainly
donít know any UFO researchers, Jewish or otherwise, who lie
about any of those things. I do know quite a few that donít have
much interest in those subjects, in the same way that people
that are interested in researching banking families and MOSSAD
and so forth donít usually have much interest in UFOs.
As noted above, many people who were
never interested in religion, metaphysics, UFOs, or anything
else out of the mainstream interests of the guys at the
truckstop, certainly knew instantly that
9/11 was an inside job.
I think that if there are UFO researchers who are what DBS
describes, then we have to seriously consider them as disinfo or
even COINTELPRO set-up organizations. And I should point out
that such operations are not restricted to Jews by any stretch
of the imagination.
DBS: Some of these people, such as Art Bell, go even further by
defending the government story of 9/11 and other crimes.
LKJ: Sure. Art Bell is COINTELPRO from bottom up. Why canít
see the connection??? The trap? Or is he deliberately not seeing
DBS: These people also promote one another, but they criticize
or ignore people who are exposing the Israeli / Zionist
connection to these crimes, such as myself, Eric Hufschmid, and
Michael Collins Piper. Do you really think it is a coincidence
that they donít like us?
LKJ: Well, I could say the same thing with a lot more
documentation to back it up, for sure. If you read Joe Quinnís
Evidence That a Frozen Fish Didnít Impact the Pentagon
on 9/11 - and Neither Did a Boeing 757, toward the end, there
is a very clear explication of COINTELPRO in action that makes
it pretty clear that NOT linking to
Signs of The Times is an
almost certain indication that a website is COINTELPRO. We
certainly notice a lot of so-called UFO research sites that
donít link to
Cassiopaea except to refer to us as a "cult" or to
publish defamatory remarks about us. Again, from what we have
learned over the years, thatís an almost certain indicator that
the website is COINTELPRO.
I am willing to bet that the majority of such UFO researchers as
DBS describes ALL promote the alleged "aliens" as PHYSICAL
entities from distant planets with a more advanced civilization
and benevolent agendas.
Well, actually, in the years since I started talking about
hyperdimensional realities and a NEGATIVE "control system"
similar (but more developed) to what
Vallee has talked about,
there has been a "reaction" in that some of the UFO disinfo
trappers have started talking about something similar. But in
all cases, they talk about it as a "benevolent" phenomenon. The
recent TV series, The 4400 is an example. 4,400 people are
abducted "from the future."
Now, certainly, our Cassiopaean
Transmissions claim to come "from the future," but those same
Cís say, unequivocally, that no "positive" being ever "abducts"
anyone. Not EVER. The "good guys" donít "play chess", preferring
to work within the natural order of things as a courtesy toward
Creation. But here, on network TV, we have a program that mixes
all the nonsensical alien stuff with our own work in such a way
as to corrupt it and discredit it. Typical COINTELPRO.
The fact is, if a person does NOT allow for the hyperdimensional
hypothesis, and if they are truly sincere about their seeking of
answers and their desire to promote truth, they WILL be "taken
out" one way or the other. We have seen it happen time and
And I am not saying that anybody needs to believe it; just take
it as a theory and work with the theoretical constructs in terms
of self-defense. If you donít, you are TOAST. Take that to the
DBS: Who is Jeff Rense? Try to find information about this man.
People will justify his secrecy on the grounds that he is afraid
for his life, which is justifiable. However, it is also possible
that he is hiding something more sinister. His stepmother, Paige
Rense, is editor-in-chief of Architectural Digest. This is one
of the magazines owned by Si Newhouse.
LKJ: Well, Rense is a cipher to me, too. I only recently learned
that he is a close pal of Jay Weidner and that he and Jay and
Vincent Bridges used to be members of
Ray Flowers group. The Cís
pretty clearly indicated Flowers as a COINTELPRO handler. From
my point of view, after a long period of observation, Rense is
out there pushing the alien noise agenda in a big way.
He is a "tar baby." All the folks
(and there are MILLIONS of them) who KNOW that the reality is
strange, or who have had truly traumatic experiences (I think a
lot of it is
gov mind control programs) rush to be enfolded in
the arms of anybody who will give them some validation, some
peace of mind about what has happened to them. And then, they
are RIPE for being vectored.
This is a horrible situation, when you think about it. And it is
doing nobody any good for people like DBS to come out and simply
negate the reality of millions of people and make it an
"either/or" or "black/white" proposition. That is exactly what
the Zionists/Fundies /Bush Reich do!
DBS: For all we know, Jeff Rense truly believes in UFOs, and
associates of Si Newhouse or others are encouraging his UFO
habit. See our article about the media if you never heard of
LKJ: I donít think Jeff Rense really "believes" what he
promotes. Keeping in mind the close connection between Weidner
and Rense, is very instructive to read the entire Weidner
exchange that I
published on our website.
(Weidner is referred to as "Alvin
Wiley" and Vincent Bridges is referred to as "Maynerd Most" in
Some of the beliefs that Weidner
espouses, that come up here and there in startling clarity, are
truly scary. So, if Rense is a friend of Weidner, and itís a
certainty (in my mind, you read the material and decide for
yourself) that Weidner is COINTELPRO, then a lot of strange
connections begin to make sense. But, Iíll save all of that
research for another post.
Suffice it to say that Rense publishes attacks on Art Bell, and
now DBS is publishing attacks on Rense AND Art Bell. Looks like
a typical COINTELPRO three way food fight designed to divert and
distract and make a lot of noise and confusion.
Yes, indeed, these people KNOW that the UFO thing is NOT a
physical, benevolent phenomenon. And that is exactly why they
promote the opposite. And that is why we were targeted by them
so early in the game. Read my article "Something Wicked This Way
Comes" for insight on this one.
DBS: Why is Jeff Rense posting so many articles from
Carlson, Karl Schwarz, and UFO supporters? Is this your idea of
serious journalism? If not, please do not support him.
LKJ: See above. DBSí journalism isnít much better.
DBS: If you cannot help, get out of my way I am calling for
Jeff Rense to immediately stop promoting Jon Carlson. Carlson belongs
on the list of suspects in the 9/11 disinformation campaign, and
anybody -- including Rense -- who continues to promote this man
after reading his latest articles should also be considered a
suspect. And Karl Schwarz should also be investigated. I also
want Rense to stop promoting UFO theories. A photo that shows a
blurry object in the sky is nothing more than a photo of a
blurry object. Anybody who claims the blurry object is a
spacecraft with aliens from Alpha Centauri is incapable of
proper reasoning, or a disinformation agent who is trying to
make conspiracy theories seem idiotic.
People who truly believe aliens are
flying around the earth should get out of the 9/11 movement and
stop pretending they they are 9/11 researchers. We donít need
idiots in this movement. This is a serious fight against a lot
of intelligent Zionists, and we donít need morons giving us a
bad image. We need to attract people who can think, not idiots
who believe aliens are making crop circles, or lunatics who
believe in Paranormal Holiday Stories. We will not defeat the
Zionists with a horde of morons.
LKJ: Well, obviously, since my husband is an internationally
known theoretical physicist, and the average IQ of the QFG is
probably somewhere around 130, DBS just comes across as wildly
flinging mud without rhyme, reason, or good sense. His arguments
are little better than what might be constructed by an average 9
year old. At the beginning of his interview with John Kaminski,
he talked about the "4,000 year old" Jewish messianic beliefs.
Just one of his ignorant comments.
Again, just as the noise around 9/11 turns people off to the
truth, (people like DBS) so does the noise around the UFO/alien
issue turn people off. (people like Art Bell). Ideas that leave
out whole, major, slices of reality - of phenomena that DOES
happen - do no service to anyone and only add to the noise. But
then, maybe that is DBSí agenda?
DBS: If Rense wants to promote UFOs, then he should return to
his previous web site,
LKJ: Rense canít. He sold the domain to Henry Winkler,
DBS: Discussions are acceptable; Deception is a crime It is
acceptable to discuss the issue of whether there is a god, and
whether there are several gods, but it is not acceptable to
point to a blurry object in a photograph and claim that the
blurry object is God.
LKJ: Gee, thanks DBS for giving us all permission to think and
discuss things! And if "deception is a crime," do we arrest him
now for lying about the 4,000 year old Jewish Messianic
tradition? His little rant about the photo of God, etc, is
actually standard disinfo ... Itís called "setting up a straw
man so you can knock him down." So, does that make him a disinfo
Good question. But if heís the best theyíve got, Rense doesnít
have anything to worry about. But, maybe thatís the point.
One thing we have learned is this: the disinfo only gets subtler
and subtler. Once you avoid one trap, the next one is laid...
DBS: Likewise, it is acceptable to discuss the issue of whether
there are aliens on the earth, but it is not acceptable to point
to a blurry object in a photograph and claim that the blurry
object is an alien spacecraft.
LKJ: Aside from being tediously asinine, the above is rather
confusing coming, as it does, after all else he has said on the
subject up to this point. However, we happen to agree with him
that it is not acceptable to point to blurry objects and declare
that they are alien spacecraft. We donít do that. But this
remark seems to contradict what he said earlier:
"People who truly believe aliens are flying around the earth
should get out of the 9/11 movement and stop pretending they
they are 9/11 researchers. We donít need idiots in this
movement. This is a serious fight against a lot of intelligent
Zionists, and we donít need morons giving us a bad image."
So he has contradicted himself, after doing the "set up a
straw man so you can knock him down" routine, he has knocked
At the end of this really nutzoid piece
of writing, DBS closes with:
Daryl Bradford Smith will no longer tolerate the contamination of
evidence of Israelís complicity in world domination. They are mixing
UFOs, crop circles, Remote Viewing, and other drivel to discredit
the hard evidence of Zionist crimes.
Do not post Smithís material on any site that promotes such
nonsense, and donít support the radio hosts who promote it.
I also am asking John Kaminski to stop posting articles on the Rense
web site. John, why are you supporting Rense?
People who knowingly deceive people are criminals; con artists;
swindlers. The UFO swindlers belong on the list to be guillotined.
They are giving the subject of "conspiracies" a bad image, which in
turn is allowing corruption to continue.
our earlier article about the guillotine list before you
complain about the previous paragraph.
If you think UFOs are real, all you have to do is Remote View the
people at Coast to Coast radio, and others like them, and watch them
laugh at the Useful Idiots who believe their nonsense.
Hmmm.... "Useful Idiots." Iíve heard that phrase before. Yes, itís
coming to me now: I was introduced to the concept by none other than
Now, letís look again at this apparent food fight between Daryl
Bradford Smith and Jeff Rense.
I did some checking around and it seems that DBS appeared out of
nowhere, as far as we can tell, in February. His domain name was
registered on February 8, a few days after our researchers had
finished one research project and begun another project that were
both related to determining and possible future exposure of,
COINTELPRO, but I canít disclose either of them just now. Just
suffice it to say that the emergence of this present situation
relates very closely to those projects and suggests that the objects
of our investigation must have friends in high places who are now
setting up this present apparent food fight as a smoke screen.
this last sentence and read between the lines, please. Smithís
domain was registered by proxy, by the way. Iím not even sure the
guy really is in France. All that could be smoke and mirrors. His
website help is based in Sarasota, Florida. In a rather short period
of time, he was able to get more or less "high profile" (in
alternative news context) interviewees on his show. Whatís up with
He gets all kinds of promotion from places like Godlike Productions
(which we know a lot about, and which, by the way, continuously
attack and defame us in truly vicious and illegal ways) and some
other strange people, but when you listen to his shows, they are
mostly just ignorant pot stirring. Itís almost like DBS is a straw
man himself, being set up to be knocked down by Rense.
Now, based on what I KNOW to be true, if he is doing these shows in
France, he is breaking the law. Promoting hate, as he is doing, is
illegal in France.
Anyway, less than two weeks after DBS registers his domain name, (a
short time after our researchers had started the project mentioned
above), Jay Weidner launched an odd "attack" on our webmaster,
chronicled here. (Donít skip this one, itís a doozie! You wanna know
how these guys operate? Read it and weep if you donít fall off your
Of course, that could all be coincidental. But there were other
"coincidences" related to this same gang. As it happens, immediately
after Rense had me on his show to discuss my article "MOSSAD and
Moving Companies", at which time he also published
defamation of myself, my husband, our children, and QFG, Jay Weidner
registered "cassiopaea.net" (which is referenced in the above linked
I had the feeling when Rense invited me on his show, and then
published the defamatory piece by Weidner at the same time, that
there was a particular agenda. I had the strong feeling that it was
his intent to draw me out on the issue of MOSSAD and Zionists, to
get me to say things that are illegal to say in France. Well, I
refused to be drawn. I later wrote about this as follows (though, at
the time, I had no idea of the close relationship between Rense and
As many of you know, almost exactly a month ago, I was invited to
talk on the Jeff Rense show as a consequence of the MOSSAD and
Moving Companies Article. What was rather surprising was the fact
that Maynerd Most and Alvin Wiley saw fit to send in a libelous
article to Rense about us. (Keep in mind that the term "libel"
refers specifically to lies.) Rense put the article as an addenda at
the bottom of an article written by Richard Sauder that mentioned
Cassiopaea as a possibly valid source of factual information.
found it to be incomprehensible that Rense would invite me to speak
while, at the same time publish an article libelling me. Rense
himself explained that he had published articles by Alvin Wiley
before and always found his research to be good. When he was
notified of the facts of the situation and provided with evidence of
Wiley and Mostí lies, Rense removed the libelous piece and
We have certainly noted that Wiley occasionally writes op-ed pieces
on political subjects, generally denigrating the Bush Regime in a
mild way and that Most and his other co-horts are fairly active in
political comments of a similar nature - decrying the war, the
plight of the Palestinians, and so on.
So, it was certainly curious to discover that
Wiley and Most would
suddenly emerge in opposition to some obvious conclusions about the
9-11 event and possible government complicity. After all, we here at
Signs are basically on the same page with Most and Wiley in
political position, right? We are all Pro-humanity and anti-War,
right? Even if we donít agree philosophically, we will certainly
find a common ground politically, right?
One would think so. But we notice in
Kevin MacDonaldís CofC that the
chief way to take apart an individualistic society is to turn the
individuals against each other.
What a concept!
After all, even if - in my opinion -
Wiley and Most are off in la-la
land with their claims to esoteric traditions - I would have to
admire any work they do to promote humanity as a whole and the
But exactly the opposite happened here. And I was puzzled.
Maynerd of Arabia?
Maynerd Most, journalist?
Back on 9-11, as I noted in the
MOSSAD Happy Dance, I was extremely
puzzled by the fact that Maynerd Most and his gang were crowing with
delight at the destruction of the World Trade Center. After all,
with his penchant for dressing up in Arabic outfits, that seemed to
me to be a bit foolish.
At a later point in time, I really began to wonder about this
possible connection to Islamic terrorists since I did find a link
between Mujaheedin and Drunvalo Melchizedek and there were many
connections between Maynerd Most and Alvin Wiley and
However, it was only after a period of long observation that this
theory was discarded. After reviewing the material presented in the
MOSSAD and Moving Companies article, the light bulb went on and I
realized that it was truly COINTELPRO at its finest.
Back to Wiley and Most and the Rense show affair.
Two days after this show, it seems that Alvin Wiley - remember
Alvin? A guy who regularly posts articles attacking the Bush
Administration? We are anti-Bush too, so one would think that we are
"in the same camp," so to say - well, Alvin Wiley purchased "cassiopaea.net"
to set up an ANTI-Cassiopaea website! (For details, see the
Correspondence, and scroll to the end where these letters are
Shortly afterward, Maynerd Most and several others (though they may
have just been different identities of Most himself) joined the casschat discussion list in order to begin a campaign of disruption
Meanwhile, we discovered a website called "The Ross Institute" which
appears to be VERY serious and informative. Their
The information within the Ross Institute archives has been
collected to offer the public a resource concerning groups called
"cults," controversial organizations and movements. However, the
mention and/or inclusion of a group or leader within this archive
does not define that group as a "cult" and/or an individual
mentioned as either destructive and/or harmful. Instead, such
inclusion simply reflects that archived articles and/or research is
available about a group or person that has generated some interest
All the information archived must be evaluated critically, through a
process of independent and individual judgment. Please note that
there are links often prominently posted at the top of each
individual page to a group or movementís own official website, which
reflect their views. It is important to see what they have to say.
And lo and behold, what do we find on the
Ross Institute list of
Why, a link to Maynerd Mostí "take" on Cassiopaea!
Now, this is going to get VERY juicy in just a minute, but before we
get to the BEST part, let me just present a little exchange Ark had
with Rick Ross of the Ross Institute List of "Dangerous Cults!":
From: Arkadiusz Jadczyk
Subject: correction to
Date sent: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 18:55:36 +0200
My name and name of my wife is mispelled in The Cassiopeiaís (Ark
Jadcyzk and Laura Knight-Jadcyzk)
It should read "Jadczyk"
And if you donít mind, would you be so kind and provide also a link
to the original web-site of Laura and Ark Jadczyk? http://cassiopaea.org
From: "Rick Ross"
To: "Arkadiusz Jadczyk"
Subject: Re: correction to
Date sent: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 17:02:59 -0400
The spelling will be corrected, but there seems to be problem. The
link you point out on the Institute Links page seems to go to a
commercial promotions page. Where is the information specifically
warning about a destructive group? Have you deleted it?
Rick Ross www.rickross.com
From: Arkadiusz Jadczyk
To: "Rick Ross"
Subject: Re: correction to
Date sent: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 07:48:33 +0200
First of all in The Truth about Cassiopeia: Ouiji Alien Alert you
Maynerd Most is a liar: See:
It is true that we have a politically oriented
and scientifically oriented
But in no way our site fits the criteria of "destructive cults".
Therefore Maynerd Most lied again when trying to discredit our site
and us by suggesting to you that "Arkadiusz and Laura Jadczyk are a
What I propose is: either delete the link completely, or, if you
want to keep the link to the site full of lies about me and my wife,
vincentbridges.com, please be fair and add also the two links
above which document the true destructive nature of Maynerd Most and
On our site "cassiopaea" we pursue similar goal as you do. See for
Listing us as a "cult", what Maynerd Most suggests, is an error on
your part. You probably did not check his facts.
The two pages:
tell the truth about the man your link promotes.
From: "Rick Ross"
To: "Arkadiusz Jadczyk"
Subject: Re: correction to
Date sent: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 07:03:37 -0400
The spelling will be corrected.
To better understand the site and the Links page specifically, see
Your request to add additional links is refused.
Regarding Rick Ross, Cletus Nelson, a Los Angeles journalist, writes
(published on The Lew Rockwell site):
To best understand why agents of the federal government massacred
the members of a small Texas church, it behooves the conscientious
WACO historian to closely examine the social forces lurking behind
this unprecedented disaster.
If there is one sustaining thread which runs throughout this deadly
exercise of state power, it is an endless pattern of deception.
From the very outset, the public was falsely led to believe a
multiracial spiritual community was largely comprised of gun-running
"rednecks" steeped in violent apocalypse theology and martial
As if to further darken the picture, thinly veiled allegations of
child abuse and cultic phenomenon were widely circulated on
television and in the mainstream press. This egregious use of what
media analysts refer to as "negative framing" would seal the fate of
the controversial 7th Day Adventist sect when it was deemed
politically expendable by Washington officials.
Evidence suggests that these unsubstantiated claims which continue
to shade our perception of the events at Mt. Carmel can be
attributed to a small cadre of para-political "watchdog" groups.
There is nothing intrinsically wrong with citizens banding together
to expose government waste, combat police brutality, or warn the
public of faulty or dangerous products.
However, in the lucrative realm of public policy activism lurk a
number of pro-government advocacy groups whose very existence rests
upon the notion that cult activities, political extremism or some
other unnamed evil constitutes a dangerous threat to state power.
In order to identify the alleged thought criminals in our midst,
operatives aligned with these private surveillance networks
infiltrate unconventional spiritual or religious movements, maintain
files on American citizens, and work closely with both media and law
enforcement to target individuals and organizations whose beliefs
run counter to establishmentarian beliefs.
In essence, these ersatz defenders of human rights act as de facto
spokesmen for our emergent surveillance society. Itís COINTELPRO
redux, only this time with help from a network of dubious, yet-well
One such organization is the Cult Awareness Network (CAN). Although
the legendary cult-busters have since disappeared from the public
spotlight after suffering a ruinous civil judgment, the once
prominent watchdog group still enjoy an infamous place among WACO
researchers. Indeed, the first stirrings of the Koresh investigation
began when a CAN affiliate named Rick Ross allegedly "deprogrammed"
various former Davidians and contacted BATF officials with lurid
tales of child abuse and illegal machine guns. [...]
Few bothered to question the credibility of an organization which
has flung the "cult" smear at Catholic monasteries, yoga groups, and
even Karate classes! Instead, the public recoiled at the stunning
accusations leveled against the besieged religious group. Meanwhile,
far below the media radar, longtime critics of CAN noticed a
familiar modus operandi. Citing outspoken CAN opponent Dr. Gordon
Melton, Carol Moore notes that the organization,
"has found two
successful methods of disrupting groups: first, false anonymous
charges of child abuse and second, kidnapping and Ďdeprogrammingí
In the aftermath of the tragic conflagration,
Ross would justify the
fatal tank attack in a self-serving letter to former Attorney
General Janet Reno.
"One thing is sure, David Koresh was an absolute
authoritarian cult leader who exercised total control over his
followers/victims. In the final analysis, he decided to end the
However, Ross would later be subjected to the withering criticism of Princeton University religious scholar
Nancy T. Ammerman
in a report prepared for the Department of Justice which challenged CANís ersatz expertise:
"Although these people often call themselves Ďcult experts,í they
are certainly not recognized as such by the academic community. The
activities of CAN are seenÖ as a danger to religious liberty, and
deprogramming tactics have been increasingly found to fall outside
the law. At the very least, Mr. Ross and any ex-members he
associated with should have been seen as questionable sources of
Thus it is imperative that we closely scrutinize the information
disseminated by the watchdog element and its relationship with
government agencies Ė lest we witness further atrocities (and the
ensuing cover-ups) on American soil.
Hmmm... Well, well, well.
Maynerd Most and Alvin Wiley DO keep INTERESTING company! No wonder
they went bananas over the MOSSAD article!
Coming back to
Mr. Rick Ross, implicated in the Waco affair and a
host of other unsavory activities that exactly fit what Kevin
MacDonald has described in his study of the destruction of Western
Civilization, I suppose we should be honored that our status has
been bumped up so as to require the special attention of so
accomplished an agent! Aside from the fact that it proves our point
that the agenda of Most and Wiley and gang, from the beginning, has
been to run a COINTELPRO on us - it also leads us a bit closer to
the center of the web - the Masterminds of Global Terrorism.
The final email from Mr. Rick Ross is a little reply to Arkís
question: "Did you really write the following:
I was not "fined $2,500,000.00." This was a civil judgment, not a
"I was never charged with "kidnapping," but instead "unlawful" or
From: "Rick Ross"
To: "Arkadiusz Jadczyk"
Subject: Re: correction to
Date sent: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 09:28:18 -0400
The site you are quoting has received recognition within
the Hall of
Flames section titled Flaming Websites. See
Note: See the listing/link for "Rick Ross: Guardian of the truth or
garner of attention?"
This site received a maximum four flame award level, quite a
Let me know when your website work is complete and I will review it
for a possible award. Maybe you can earn four flames too.
Frankly, we think we deserve FIVE FLAMES for spotting
action, especially with so many apparent links to MOSSAD.
As far as
Signs is concerned, the litmus test has been applied: we
KNOW Maynerd Most and Alvin Wiley are liars and Rick Ross supports
their websites and refuses to post a prominent link to the report on Maynerd Most - verified in every particular.
Maynerd Most? The guy doing the
MOSSAD Happy Dance on 9-11
along with the moving guys on top of a truck who were watching the
WTC burn? Remember Maynerd Most and Alvin Wiley? The guys who have
devoted their lives to flaming and libelling Cassiopaea? And all we
ever did was decline to be taken over by them.
That says it all.
Coming back now to DBS and his operations in France. We notice that
DBS uses the title: "The French Connection" .
Have a look here for the notice on
my French Connection pages which
were begun on March 8, 2003.
Now, obviously, I canít talk about
The French Connection
DBSí) for very particular reasons. But, even though I canít reveal
certain details, Iím going to tell a little story that I hope will
enable the reader to "read between the lines." Also, refer again to
what I wrote above about drugs and human trafficking and
and youíll have some idea of some of the forces behind the fact that
I canít talk about what was there. These same forces are probably
behind the events I am going to recount.
Some background: Recently a reader sent me an item that was posted
on Montalkís forum:
Signs of the Times wrote:
Comment: Yes, it HAS been a "good year" for the American People, but
not in the way Bush is describing it. Itís been good because
I, Scooter Libby was indicted, possibly leading to more indictments
next year; Abramoff is getting ready to sing his lungs out, possibly
leading to more indictments of Bush cronies; the Patriot Act was NOT
made permanent; Bush crony, Harriet Meiers didnít become a Supreme
Court judge; Bush and his Gang have been exposed as vile torturers,
and breakers of the Law of the Land, and the possibility of
Impeachment is looming on the horizon for next year. Yes, indeed,
itís been a good year for the American People, but a veritable annus
horribilis for Bush. Letís make a New Yearís wish for Bush: May you
get everything you deserve in the coming New Year!
Montalk forum writer:
This was the lead comment on the Cís Signs of the Times page
(http://signs-of-the-times.org/signs/signs.htm). Unusually positive
outlook from them. I wonder if they are engaged in a bit of the
wishful thinking they are usually so disdainful of. Sure, when you
put it the way they just did, this was a great year for us and a bad
year for TPTB, or at least Bush. Could it have been orchestrated to
only look bad for him, or are the forces of goodness and STO-ness
Perhaps these minor victories have been handed to us only to give us
a false sense of victory, in turn breeding complacency? I find it
hard to believe that any real positive change could be underway re:
Bush. Perhaps TPTB are tiring of him, or lulling us into false hope
before the next major "event." But it does seem odd that the group
that is always so quick to warn of the dangers of good news is
celebrating; perhaps someone is pulling their strings also, or
For those who donít know,
Montalk is a young kid who used to be a
member of QFG. There was a parting of the ways between him and
during the awful summer of 2003 when the events were transpiring
that I was writing about in
the French Connection. At that time, QFG
discovered that Montalk had a number of articles on his site that
advocated keeping guns, storing food, joining militias, and hanging
out with some pretty fringe characters who are undoubtedly "vacuum
Even though these were "old articles" and modified by additional
commentary, based on what was happening "on the ground", so to say,
in France, we could see that this was a disaster waiting to happen.
At that very moment, due to the actions of Vincent Bridges and
Weidner in concert with Jeff Rense, Ark and I and the Signs Team
were being harassed by a strange group of individuals in France who
had some close connections to the French Gendarmerie which was under
the control of Nicolas Sarkozy, a close friend of Netanyahu.
we have enemies in very high places; why do you think so much energy
is concentrated on attacking, defaming, slandering, and even
physically threatening us?)
And so, we relied on the idea that, if
we ASKED him to remove those articles, or to publicly distance
himself from those ideas, for our safety, and to trust us that we
werenít just being paranoid here, he would do so and we could pass
through this danger and talk about it later. But he neither trusted
our assessment of the situation, nor was he willing to act in favor
of our safety.
Certainly, what Montalk had written on his website was pretty
"ordinary" in the U.S. Recently Montalk defended his writing by
pointing out that it,
goes entirely along with law and encourages the involvement of
government, as well as seeks reduction in handguns which so many
gangsters and thugs like to use. It encourages responsibility among
citizens and alleviates some burden off law enforcement and the
military, much like the system in Switzerland. Now, how would this
attract attention from three-letter federal agencies as the Cass
team claims? How would this advocate the stockpiling of weapons for
a physical revolution? It wouldnít... the article is a peaceful
solution to the gun issue.
Guns are a last resort, but not one to be dismissed...
Frankly, despite Montalks protestations, I donít think that the
above should be considered a "safe" thing to write on oneís website
in any country considering the state of the world and the Bush
Reichís "war on terror." The reader might want to go and read this
essay, and then go back and read "How To Spot a Spy" that I have
transcribed above and draw some conclusions of their own.
that any individual who is concerned about possibly being put on a
list to be spied on or picked up and tossed in a gitmo camp should
stay away from ANY website that even hints that it supports armed
insurrection. It may be "technically legal," but then, the folks at
Waco were technically legal also. After Rick Ross did his "theyíre a
dangerous cult" rant to the authorities, nobody cared about legal
technicalities: they were all burned to a crisp.
More than that,
Montalk completely ignored the exact terms of what
we were saying to him: that we were being set up, we could see it,
and rational thinking has no bearing on a set-up. Set-ups rely on
"knee-jerk" reactions being set off by false claims and taking
things out of context.
Thatís a historical fact, and those who
forget history are doomed to repeat it. Being associated with
Montalk and his militia/gun-toting ideas - while living in France
where what he was calling "reasonable" ideas are NOT acceptable - at
that point would have gotten us thrown out of France in a heartbeat!
Or worse, accused of being a cult with designs on the safety of
knows who, surrounded and burned out. Notice Montalk's reference to
"three letter agencies," as if that was the main thing we were
worried about. That is completely disingenuous because of what I
wrote to him at the time which included:
I am not sure you realize how all of the recent exchanges have
affected us here. Iím not even sure that you understand what danger
you have put all of us in. You donít have children, and it is not
automatic for you to think of the consequences of actions,
associations, and so on - and how it might affect everyone you love.
Well, I DO think about it all the time - not just for our family
here - but for the group at large.
At this moment, it begins to look like an array of "set-ups" all the
way around us, all designed to define us as a "dangerous cult." ...
At the present moment, in fact, right after the Rense article/show -
someone (we donít know who) filed a complaint against us for doing
"psychological damage" to them - that we are a "dangerous cult."
At any event, French intell is RIGHT NOW investigating ALL OUR
CONNECTIONS. And you can bet that they will be reading everything on
YOUR site also....
The fact it,
had a lot more information about the situation
than he has revealed on his website to date. The urgency of the
matter - to take action right now - was completely lost on Montalk.
He delayed, fiddled around, and wrote endless emails arguing his
right to say "reasonable things" on his own website, and endlessly
debating whether we might be mis-reading the situation, and maybe we
were wrong, and so on and so forth.
Meanwhile, days were passing and
the danger was growing. Either he didnít get it, or he got it all
too well and all this was just "delaying tactics." Things were
happening so fast that I couldnít even write fast enough to keep up
with them. More than that, there were things we could not write
about without putting ourselves in greater danger. In more recent
times, he has written about the matter as follows:
This article was just an idea I came up with while researching the
subject for a literature class. In the way itís written, it would be
benign even in the eyes of federal agencies who may instead nod at
its advocacy of responsibility. The only thing the Cass team is
threatened by is the illusion they created by taking selected parts
out of context and ignoring the rest.
As it turned out, we were right and Montalk was wrong. Those are the
facts on the ground. It was no illusion, and we pointed out from the
beginning that anything that COULD be taken out of context would be,
and that was the point.
Indeed, the situation grew and escalated and Ark and I were
eventually summoned for interrogations. We were photographed and
fingerprinted. I was ill at the time, but that didnít make any
difference: the interrogation lasted almost four hours. Among the
prepared questions (I was allowed to see the questions exactly one
hour before they were addressed to me on the record), was the loaded
"What is your relationship or association with the internet
character known as Montalk and his ideas?"
Yup. There it was. The question that, had we answered that he was a
friend and member of our group, considering his "advocacy of armed
insurrection" and having guns in the closet, would have led - at the
very least - to an assessment by the French government that we were
potential threats to the public order.
Now, as it happened, prior to this interrogation, several other
things were going on in relation to the growing threat that Montalk
did not know about. Z*** was an individual who showed up on our
doorstep in France (at exactly the same time) with the stated
intention of "protecting" me from the many dangers he assured me
were "out there" waiting to "take me out." His ideas included arming
ourselves to the teeth and creating some kind of hierarchical
structure where the only people who had access to me were ones
vetted by - who else? - Z***! He claimed to be ex-special forces,
trained in all kinds of high-faultingí martial arts and whatnot.
I politely, but firmly, refused his offers of "personal security,"
he left, stealing a number of things from our house before he went.
I suspect that he took these items to turn them over to his Voodoo
masters so they could try to make big, ugly ju-ju against me. (Sorry
guys, doesnít work on me.) So, we had Weidner, Bridges (and
default) broadcasting widely that we were a dangerous cult holed up
in the French countryside, an association with a website that
advocated guns and armed insurrection, had published a checklist to
"Spot the OP," (xenophobia), and a guy on our doorstep with military
connections and undoubted connections to some real cult action.
never did find out much more about him in this respect to any degree
of certainty because we sent him packing.)
Meanwhile, a formal
complaint that we were a cult had been filed in France, and our
applications for permanent residence were an open case which
included thorough background investigations by French Intell
What a set up!
We decided to consult the Cís about this. The Cís pointed out the
fact that a trap was being laid, and something needed to be done
Of course, as described, we first gave the opportunity to
create the needed distance himself. As a member of the QFG (Quantum
Future Group), he was
told what the danger was, was asked to do what was necessary to
distance QFG from perceived association with radical, revolutionary,
and even violent philosophies.
We explained that it didnít matter
that what he was writing was legal and acceptable in the U.S., or
that he had written commentary that encouraged "government
involvement" and "reduction" in handguns. What mattered was the
environment WE were in, and observing history and how other groups
had been similarly set up and the fact that, at that moment, we were
being thoroughly investigated and even a whiff of anything "off"
would be fatal.
Ark and I - and several other QFG members - wrote to him explicitly
that these associations were dangerous to QFG and its entirely
peaceful, philosophical aims, under the circumstances that prevailed
at the time, and to please distance himself from those groups and
ideas for the sake of the safety of all. He just couldnít bring
himself to do it. It was easier to accuse us of being "threatened by
.. the illusion they created by taking selected parts out of context
and ignoring the rest."
We werenít taking anything out of context, we were taking everything
IN context, in the context of historical precedent and a realistic
evaluation of the clues in the environment.
It was exactly the same dynamic as it was with
Vincent Bridges. He
was into the Nazi black magic stuff while Ark and I and the nascent QFG were being attacked by agents of the ADL about those issues back
in the summer of 2001, and when we spoke to him explicitly asking
him to publicly distance himself from that nonsense for the sake of
the safety of QFG, he refused. We then had to take steps of our own
to make it clear to our readers that we in no way supported or
subscribed to such ideas.
It seems that in both cases, Montalk and
Bridges were so
"identified" with their ideas, with their formulations of reality,
that criticism of those formulas was taken as criticism of
themselves. They donít even have to be conscious to be agents.
On the other hand, maybe they arenít so "identified" and ARE
conscious of what they are doing?
We canít say.
I can say that now, after having read the little booklet on
Spot a Spy that I have reproduced above that both of them fit the
criteria for COINTELPRO agents provocateur. Canít you just see it?
QFG is already accused of being a Cult by the
Bridges/Weidner/Ross/Zionist disinfo campaign and what happens to
cults with guns? Think Waco. We did due to the following Cís session
August 17, 2003
Q: (L) So what was Z**ís agenda?
A: You figured that one out.
Q: (J) Yeah he wanted to "cultify" us.
A: All of these many activities stem from the same "urge." Think
about Waco and guns. Put that together with [Montalk] and his guns
and you and the charge of "cult."
Q: (L) He could get us killed!
A: Stop and think about the possibility that your work was known in
advance and all the preparations were made in advance to make the
charge of cult mean what it does today.
Group laughter and shock at concept.
Q: (L) Was it done via time travel?
A: Not necessary. "Mass dreams of the future" anyone?
Q: (L) Thatís a book where people get progressed into the future and
see the future. Itís kind of like time travel in your head. (JH) Is
that sort of like remote viewing?
A: Oh indeed!
Q: (L) So they can see the future, which has something to do with
the Montauk project. And they obviously sought to do something about
the future by adjusting the present, in a way. Hmmm... Montauk,
Montalk... it even has a signature for anyone who cares to see it! (JH)
Do the guys in
the Aviary have anything to do with it?
A: You would not believe how many are involved. Many innocently of
It is an experiential fact that because
Montalk refused to
disassociate from his armed encampment ideas, QFG was placed in a
very dangerous situation, especially when you include the concurrent
activities of Bridges, Weidner, Rense, and then Z*** added to the
local "elements" with Zionist connections. A simple request for him
to publicly distance himself from those kinds of activities was met
with stubborn refusal and QFG was obliged to take action to protect
our lives, our liberty, and our work. It was that simple.
Now, was this a case of just Montalkís ego? In the case of Bridges
Enochian Nazi Magick shtick, was it just his ego and his
firm belief in that nonsense? Or was it something deeper?
In any event, we prefer to make it clear that we do NOT promote
"revolution" or violence of any kind as the answer to the worldís
problems. In more recent times, Montalk has engaged in further self
justification as follows:
Guns are a last resort, but not one to be dismissed... look at Nazi
Germany which was disarmed before the Nazis assumed control and thus
left the Jews unable to resist, and look at Iraq which the Cass team
cheers on for resisting the American occupation with guns and bombs.
Itís hypocrisy for the Cass team to both dismiss the idea of guns
and simultaneously cheer their use in Iraq because America could be
no different in the future. Itís better to have these available and
decide not to use them, than have them banned before theyíre needed.
And if legalized, they should be used responsibly as I wrote in the
I think it is going way off the deep end to suggest that
The Times "cheers" the use of guns in Iraq. We abhor violence of any
kind. Repeatedly, readers write to us asking what to DO, and our
answer is always and ever non-violent solutions. Note also that Montalk says above that he expects America to be engaged in armed
violence in the future. Again I would warn anyone who does not wish
to be placed on a list of people to be surveilled and/or removed to
places like Gitmo, to NOT associate with any groups that promote
They are "vacuum cleaner" operations, collecting names
and data for future use. Itís that simple. As for QFG and its
non-violent philosophies, we reiterate: Our personal safety depends
on our position being made clear to the very real forces we must
deal with on a daily basis. Perhaps Montalk doesnít have to worry
about such forces?
In the final analysis, we canít say for sure that Montalk is
COINTELPRO even if the indications suggest it. What we can say is
that he is definitely not someone you would want to have to rely on
in a difficult situation. But, people like Montalk and Bridges are
useful in another way made clear in the following story:
A man and his dog were walking along a road. The man was enjoying
the scenery, when it suddenly occurred to him that he was dead. He
remembered dying, and that the dog walking beside him had been dead
for years. He wondered where the road was leading them.
After a while, they came to a high, white stone wall along one side
of the road. It looked like fine marble. At the top of a long hill,
it was broken by a tall arch that glowed in the sunlight.
When he was standing before it he saw a magnificent gate in the arch
that looked like mother-of-pearl, and the street that led to the
gate looked like pure gold. He and the dog walked toward the gate,
and as he got closer, he saw a man at a desk to one side.
When he was close enough, he called out,
"Excuse me, where are we?"
"This is Heaven, sir," the man answered.
"Wow! Would you happen to have some water?" the man asked.
"Of course, sir. Come right in, and Iíll have some ice water brought
right up." The man gestured, and the gate began to open.
"Can my friend," gesturing toward his dog, "come in, too?" the
"Iím sorry, sir, but we donít accept pets."
The man thought a moment and then turned back toward the road and
continued the way he had been going with his dog.
After another long walk, and at the top of another long hill, he
came to a dirt road leading through a farm gate that looked as if it
had never been closed. There was no fence. As he approached the
gate, he saw a man inside, leaning against a tree and reading a
"Excuse me!" he called to the man.
"Do you have any water?"
"Yeah, sure, thereís a pump over there, come on in."
"How about my friend here?" the traveler gestured to the dog.
"There should be a bowl by the pump."
They went through the gate, and sure enough, there was an
old-fashioned hand pump with a bowl beside it.
The traveler filled the water bowl and took a long drink himself,
and then he gave some to the dog. When they were full, he and the
dog walked back toward the man who was standing by the tree.
"What do you call this place?" the traveler asked.
"This is Heaven," he answered.
"Well, thatís confusing," the traveler said. "The man down the road
said that was Heaven, too."
"Oh, you mean the place with the gold street and pearly gates? Nope.
"Doesnít it make you mad for them to use your name like that?"
"No, weíre just happy that they screen out the folks who would leave
their best friends behind."
So, coming back to Daryl Bradford Smith, there are all these funny
confluences, combined with DBSí ignorant rant about anybody who
talks about UFOs ought not to be in the 9/11 "research" field, and
it has just set the warning bells ringing like mad in my head.
What also made me wonder was him coming out with his rant about
disinformation artists at the precise time he did. Now, yeah, Iíve
been writing about this for quite some time - having been victimized
by it directly and in front of thousands of witnesses. But again,
let me point out that it was only AFTER I started writing about it
in the way I did, that quite a few other folks "got on the
bandwagon." It was only shortly after I mentioned in an article a
while back that Rense never gets defamed or attacked that he
suddenly started coming up with "the Jews are attacking me" nonsense
and "Rense is on the gov list of disinformation sites".
so-called "attack" descriptions tells me that he hasnít got a clue
about what kinds of things they can do. Seems rather like damage
control to me. Especially when you consider his relationship with
Zionist, Henry Winkler. Itís all show.
So, more and more Iím beginning to think that DBS is just set up to
go after Rense as his own "personal attacker." In this way, it will
actually garner sympathy for Rense. DBS is just a "useful idiot" and
In short, I think that Daryl Bradford Smith is a tar baby. His
"attacks" on Rense are just smoke and mirrors. Too many
coincidentally "connected" things here. Call me paranoid if you
like, but after more than 6 years of this kind of thing,
experiencing it, observing it, experimenting and watching reactions,
Iím getting pretty good at spotting it. And spotting it is crucial
if you want to survive.