| 
			  
			
			 
 
  
			by David Talbott 
			from
			
			Thunderbolts Website 
			
			
 
			
			Apr 07, 2005 
			  
			 
			
			What was the cause of this uplifted region on the Saharan desert 
			floor cut by a circular crater with concentric terraces? Geologists 
			speculate that erosion by wind and water must have worked its magic 
			on the upraised dome. Electric theorists see something else—the scar 
			left by electric discharge.
 In the October 28, 2002 Astronomy Picture of the Day the 
			"explanation" goes like this:
 
				
				"What on Earth is that? The
				Richat 
			Structure in the Sahara Desert of Mauritania is easily visible from 
			space because it is nearly 50 kilometers across. Once thought to be 
			an impact crater, the Richat Structure’s flat middle and lack of 
			shock-altered rock indicates otherwise. The possibility that the Richat Structure was formed by a 
				volcanic eruption also seems 
			improbable because of the lack of a dome of igneous or volcanic 
			rock. Rather, the layered sedimentary rock of the Richat Structure 
			is now thought by many to have been caused by uplifted rock sculpted 
			by erosion.... Why the Richat Structure is nearly circular remains a 
			mystery." 
			
			Electric Universe proponents consider the circularity of the Richat 
			Structure to be predictable. So they pose a different question for 
			planetary scientists: What on Earth and Moon, 
			
			Mercury
			
			(click on below images), Venus, 
			
			Mars, 
			
			Io, 
			
			Europa, Phobos, 
			
			Mimas and Tethys, 
			
			Enceladus, 
			
			Miranda, 
			
			Eros, and 
			
			other asteroids, etc. are these? Geologists have never adequately 
			explained why almost all craters everywhere are circular. This has 
			only been dismissed as a feature of impacts, something that has 
			never been demonstrated, but only surmised. Other features of 
			various circular craters -- domes, spheres, steep walls, 
			
			chains, 
			central peaks with strata consistent with the walls or surrounding 
			terrain, undisturbed strata in the floor, unexpected size 
			distribution, unexpected placement distribution (such as location on 
			the 
			rim of other craters), 
			
			elevated ramparts 
			-- all defy coherent 
			explanation under the impact model. 
				
					
						| 
						
            
						 
						
						Mercury | 
						
						 
						
						Mars | 
						
						 
						
						Io | 
						
						 
						
						Europa     | 
						
						 
						
						Mimas and Tethys   | 
						
						 
						
						Enceladus |  
						| 
						
						 
						
						Miranda 
						
						.   | 
						
						 
						
						Eros   | 
						
						 
						
						other asteroids 
						
						.   | 
						
						 
						
						domes 
						
						.   
						
						. | 
						
						 
						
						chains | 
						
						 
						
						rim of other craters |  
				
				 
				
				elevated ramparts 
			
			Advocates of the EU model claim that craters like the Richat were 
			not formed by impacts but were "machined" by electric discharges,
			Birkeland currents that rotate around a "sticking" point and 
			excavate material by electrically accelerating it upwards without 
			disturbing the surrounding or underlying strata, unless the whole 
			area is raised in a fulgamite blister--hence Rampart Craters. 
			Specific effects will depend on a wide variety of soil conditions 
			including chemical composition, material type, density, moisture, 
			and conductivity. Discharge factors, including diameter, voltage, 
			current, and duration will also affect the crater configuration.
 
 In contrast to conventional theorists, advocates of the electric 
			universe contend that planets moved under the influence of 
			electrified plasma, a medium that can easily overwhelm gravity. 
			Orbits changed, and catastrophic electrical encounters altered the 
			terrain, the climates, and the atmospheres of planets, including our 
			Earth.
 
 In the case of the Richat Structure, it is evident that the force 
			uplifting the area also cut the concentric crater walls. In crater 
			formation, the electrical forces constrain the arc to contact the 
			surface at a 90-degree angle. Because the arc typically consists of 
			one or more pairs of channels rotating around a common axis, a 
			stationary arc will etch a circular crater and, in stratified 
			terrain, will machine out concentric circles.
 
 
			   |