Start of interview
Please tell us a little bit about yourself – as much as you feel
you can.
I’m a current employee of one of the three letter agencies [he
plays a little word game with us until we guess the right
agency, which he then confirms]. I’m probably taking quite a
risk by speaking to you like this, though I don't intend to
reveal any information that in my judgment is both classified
and specific to national security. I’ve been involved in many
projects with many different agencies over many years.
To jump right in at the deep end, I believe I was a walk-in
around eighth grade. I have memories of coming from another
planet, and these are all mixed up, all mingled with human
boyhood memories. It's very weird, and hard to explain what it
feels like. I’ve never had any problems intuitively accessing
complex scientific information and I've often found myself
understanding complex systems with no detailed briefing or
training.
I work essentially with systems. I don't mean to be
arrogant, but I do know a great deal of advanced information,
scientific and otherwise. I just seem to know it. I can’t say
more than that right now.
Can you give even any clues about which agency you work for?
No, not on public record. I just can't afford that.
What information do you feel you have that’s important for the
world to know?
There’s so much that it’s hard to know where to start.
I knew about
9/11 two years before the event, for instance. Not
in specific terms, but certainly in general ones. It was talked
about, an event like that, something that would change the game,
let's say.
I know that there’s a planned war between the US and China
scheduled for late 2008. This is also geopolitical and not
concerned with Black Ops as such. These were both just events
that I got to hear about in passing. I have no detailed
information about them.
You mean that China and the US are working together to stage a
war?
The Pentagon started the planning in 1998. You have to
understand that China and the US are hand in glove with
everything. This war is a joint op between the US and China.
Most wars are set up that way and have been for a while.
You want something else that’s just unpleasant to hear? I also
heard from someone who was serving in a unit that worked with
missiles deployed for testing in the Pacific and the Far East.
The missiles were shipped to the test location in very tightly
sealed containers, very secure, hermetically sealed. After the
tests, the container would be shipped back, sealed the same way,
but empty, supposedly empty. On one occasion, this guy was
present when a container was opened. It wasn't empty. It was
filled with bags of white powder.
Cocaine?
I leave you to draw your own conclusions. I doubt it was sugar.
Let me just say that, hypothetically speaking, and let just me
say that to protect myself, if such a plan was in operation, it
makes perfect logistical sense as it’s a totally secure way to
get around all security, customs, international boundaries and
ports, and all those checks. It’s perfect, like the way guns and
ammunition used to cross borders in diplomatic bags going
between consulates. This happens all the time.
Would you call yourself a physicist?
Yes. I cover other specialties as well, but yes, I’m a
physicist. And I specialize in systems. Livermore is a good
place to be, everyone's very professional there. They don’t, you
know, they don’t play games there.
What can you say about the current state of physics in the
military-industrial complex?
It’s dozens of years ahead of mainstream physics which is
published in journals in the public domain. There are projects
dealing with subjects beyond the belief or experience, beyond
the imagination, of many public domain physicists.
Can you give us any examples?
[long pause]
There's a project called Shiva Nova at Livermore which uses
arrays of giant lasers. These are huge lasers, huge capacitors,
many terawatts of energy, in a building built on giant springs
[extends his arms to show the size], all focused on a tiny tiny
point. This creates a fusion reaction which replicates certain
conditions for nuclear weapons testing. It’s like a nuke test in
lab conditions, and there's very powerful data collection
focused on that point where all the energy is focused.
The problem is that all extremely high-energy events like this
create rips in the fabric of space-time. This was observed back
in the early Hiroshima and Nagasaki events, and you can even see
it in the old movies. Look for what looks like an expanding
energy sphere, and I can send you a link to show you. The
problem with creating rips in space-time, whether they're big or
little, is that things get in that you don’t want to be there.
Things get in?
Things get in. Things that we all know about that are discussed
on the net a lot. Beings, and influences, and all kinds of weird
stuff, and I can tell you they’ve created big problems.
What kind of problems?
[pause]
The problem of their presence and then what happens next. The
other problem is that if you’re creating rips in space-time
you’re messing with time itself, whether you mean to or not.
There have been attempts to fix that, and it all results in a
complicated overlay of time loops. Some ETs are trying to help,
and others, others are not. When predicting futures, we can only
talk about probable and possible futures. This is all extremely
complex and very highly classified. Basically, it’s just a huge
mess. We've opened Pandora’s Box, starting with the Manhattan
Project, and we haven't yet found a way to deal with the
consequences.
The problem of multiple timelines sounds like the information
reported by Dan Burisch... can you comment on that?
[shakes head] I don’t know about any of that.
OK. We’ll send you the links so that you can see the interviews.
But what you’re saying also corroborates the information
reported by "Mr X" on the Camelot website. Have you seen or read
those interviews?
No, what does he say?
"Mr X" is an archivist who for a six-month period had the
opportunity to work with classified documents, films, photos and
artifacts back in the mid-80s when he was working on a special
project with a defense contractor. He says that he read that the
principal reason for the ETs' interest in us was because of
nuclear testing and the general threat of nuclear weapons.
That sounds about right. Except only one or two ET groups are
concerned about nuclear weapons, not all of them.
OK. What else can you tell us about the timeline problem?
Just that it’s unresolved. The risk is, you see, that each time
we try to fix it, it adds to the problem. It just gets worse all
the time.
Are the aliens – or some of the aliens – time travelers? Dan
Burisch states this.
Yes.
Do you know about
the Montauk Project?
That caused a huge problem, and generated a... created a 40-year
loop.
I don’t know about
Al Bielek. I believe some of his information
is suspect. But something like that definitely did happen,
the
Philadelphia Experiment, too. John Neumann was very involved in
all of that.
And
Tesla, and Einstein?
Don’t know. But Neumann... [nods head]
Montauk was real?
Yes. That was a real mess.
They created a time split we’re still
unable to mend. Now, understand this also relates to Project
Rainbow, the Stargates… they were also working on that there.
But some of the Montauk reports on the net are unconvincing to
me. I’ve seen some of the photos of the equipment they’re
supposed to have used, and it’s junk, just a pile of junk.
[Bill] I’ve always had a problem with the idea of time portals
because I don’t see how or why they’d stay with the planet at a
certain location as it moves through space. If a portal was
created in spacetime, you’d expect it to be left behind
somewhere very quickly as the earth rotates, and moves round in
its orbit, and the solar system itself is orbiting the galaxy in
a huge cycle. I mean, everything’s in motion, all the time, and
this is well known. Can you explain this?
No, I can’t... but I know what you mean, and the portals do stay
in specific locations, kind of anchored to this planet. That
does happen that way. Why they don’t get left behind or just
kind of float off somewhere, I have no idea. Maybe they’re
gravitationally anchored in some way. Your guess is as good as
mine.
One of the portals connects to Mars, and it’s a stable
connection, no matter where Earth and Mars are in their orbits.
We have a base there established in the early sixties. Actually,
we have a number of bases.
So we’ve explored Mars already.
Sure, a long time ago. Have you seen
Alternative Three?
Yes.
That had some truth to it.
The Mars landing video was all a
spoof, and other parts of it were as well, but there’s truth
there.
What else do you know as a physicist working on these projects?
OK. This may interest you if you have a physics background. You
know what signal non-locality is, right? When two particles in
different parts of the universe can apparently communicate with
each other simultaneously, no matter what the distance.
Communications devices have been made for communicating across
vast distances and also locally using a methodology that’s
impossible to eavesdrop on, because there's nothing traveling
between the two devices that can be intercepted. It’s impossible
to crack or code-break or eavesdrop because no signal travels
anywhere, so there’s no signal to be intercepted or decoded. It
just doesn’t work like that.
The beauty of it is that the devices are actually so simple to
build. You can create two chaotic circuits, on a couple of small
breadboards using cheap components which anyone can buy, and
they communicate with each other in this way. You can build
these if you know how.
Are there any other applications besides communication?
[pause]
Yes.
What else can you tell us about this?
That’s it. Oh, I should say that I didn’t realize at first that
you were also the guy who created
the Serpo website. Let me just
say that it wasn’t called by that name. And I doubt that the
travel took nine months. That's not how they traveled there.
Oh, you mean the travel was instantaneous?
[pause]
I don’t think they traveled the way they say they did on the Serpo website. Maybe there were other programs. There may have
been many. But travel across large distances is best done using
portals. Anything else is really... it's just inefficient.
You mean they used
Stargates?
I guess you could call them that, yes.
I also suspect the system isn’t Zeta Reticuli. It sounds to me
like Alpha Centauri. I think you mentioned this on the site.
Do you have a reason for saying that?
Well, Zeta 1 and 2 are a long way apart from one another. Alpha
Centauri and Proxima Centauri are close together. Alpha Centauri
has a solar system very much like ours, but it's older. The
planets are in stable orbits. There are three inhabited planets,
the second, third and fourth. No, wait, the fifth, I think.
Second, third and fifth.
That’s astonishing… you knew this professionally? I mean, you
came across this in the course of your work?
Yes. This is known. It’s comparatively easy to get there, less
than five light years away, and that’s, you know, it's right
next door to us. The… people… there are very human-like. They're
not Grays, they’re like us. The human form is very common in the
universe.
[Bill] Is one of the planets desert-like? That’s what I saw in
the photo I described. Two setting suns, over a desert
landscape. It really blew me away. [See this article on
Serpo section]
Yes, it is. A desert planet.
Wow.
Are you familiar with Project Looking Glass?
That sounds kind of familiar...
It was a kind of technology that Dan Burisch told us about that
involved seeing into the future. Were you involved with it?
OK, that technology wasn't developed by us. We were given it, or
it was taken from a craft we acquired. I didn't work on that.
We heard they have a man-made Stargate as Los Alamos. Are you
familiar with that?
[looks at us without answering, slight enigmatic smile]
What can you tell us about Los Alamos?
There's a
Los Alamos website I'll send you, and then you can
search there under “gravity shielding” and things like that.
It’s all there.
Now, it may have been an error that it’s in the public domain.
You might want to advise people to archive the pages they find
there before they’re taken off the web once this gets out, if it
does. But right now you can see it with your own eyes.
It’s hard to know what else to say.
What can you tell us about the ET presence?
Look up the movie Wavelength. It’s based on a totally true
story. Have you seen it? It's based on an incident that took
place at Hunter Liggett. This is a hot one.
No. Where’s Hunter Liggett?
90 miles south-south-east of Monterey, California. My primary
station at the time was Fort Ord.
I was working there back in the early 70s, when I was in the
military, and I was working under CDCEC, which is Combat
Developments Command Experimentation Command. You can go look
that up.
We were doing testing of all kinds of devices, and we lived out
in the field there. We wore laser protection goggles a lot of
the time and we had our eyes dilated routinely to check our
retinas for burns. Some of the cattle in the fields even wore
modified goggles! This was the most bizarre sight you could ever
imagine.
Well, one day something happened while we were testing. A disk
came into the area and it was hovering, it hovered right
directly in front of us, out in a field. So [pause] we shot the
****ing thing down.
You shot down a disk?
[shaking head] We should never have done it. It wasn't me
personally, but the group did. Between us we had all this gizmo
weaponry and I guess they panicked and thought they were in a
movie or something. The disk was disabled and it was captured,
and so were the occupants, and I saw these very briefly. They
were small child-like humanoids, with no hair. And they had
small eyes, not large almond-shaped eyes. I don’t think anyone
knows about this. As far as I know it’s not on the internet.
This is incredible. I've never heard of this incident.
Most of the other witnesses ended up in Vietnam and many were
killed. I may be the only living witness to what happened... I
don’t know.
The rest of the story is in a sci-fi movie called Wavelength,
which was released in the early '80s. I’d never heard of it
until I ran into it years later, in Arizona. Did I just say
this? [laughs, for the first time]
When I saw the video, I was expecting some, you know, light
entertainment with a beer or two, but I mean, my mouth just hung
wide open. The beginning of the film just completely clearly and
accurately describes the incident, and the film is very close to
the rest of the story, including the use of an abandoned Nike
base in Southern California to store them.
Go find it. It’s all basically true. I was just amazed when I
saw it. The person who wrote it must have been there, or knew
someone who was there. But I don’t know who.
I had a genuine alien photo once. I showed it to someone, a
woman, a very talented woman, who was a microbiologist working
for one of the agencies. It scared the s*** out of her. I
couldn’t believe it. She just didn’t want to deal with it at
all. And I’d say that just suggests that the public, even
scientists aren’t ready for this information to be released. And
this person was really smart. It didn’t stop her from freaking
out, just not wanting to know. She was just, you know, totally
spooked.
Do you still have the photo? Can we see it?
I don’t know. I may still have it somewhere, and if I can find
it, I’ll forward it to you.
Can you describe it?
It showed a small being with dark skin, kind of black and
wrinkled. He was a sole survivor of an incident. But he died
shortly afterwards. He had a suit that was self-healing, ah...
self-repairing. It was a kind of fabric, or something, that
would actually repair itself. And he had an artifact with him
that was some kind of remote control device, and that was taken
away from him.
He was the survivor of a crash?
[pause]
No.
A time traveler?
You know everything, don't you?
No, but you're giving us verification.
I mean, it’s just so incredibly complicated. It’s so complex
it’s possible that no one person has all the information. Most
of the agencies don’t know what the other agencies know and
everything is heavily compartmentalized right up the wazoo.
No-one talks to anyone else about this stuff. Sometimes entire
projects are duplicated at the cost of God knows how many
billions because the existence of the other project is unknown,
it‘s kept from them. I mean, I’m a scientist, and scientists
sometimes have one arm tied behind their backs because they
can't communicate freely. In fact, they can’t communicate at all
[laughs]. And there are dozens, hundreds of classified projects,
I mean major ones. It’s just a total mess.
Look, there are many groups of ETs, and besides our own
ancestors are mixed in there. There are time loops upon time
loops, and it’s all a mess. You’d need an IQ of 190 to figure it
all out.
Tell us about the time loops. By the way, can we ask you again….
you’ve not heard of Dan Burisch?
Not that I remember. It's not familiar to me.
We interviewed him last month. He was next to John Lear on the
web page.
I did see your interview with John Lear, talking about the moon
photos and the way they’re airbrushed. NASA does that all the
time. He’s quite a character, by the way. I’d like to meet him
one day.
What few people know is that radar reports for the National
Weather Service are also airbrushed, so that certain radar
images aren’t released. I don’t mean airbrushed as in by hand.
The radar images are electronically filtered using software.
Some of these radar traces are huge. In addition, the weather
radar won’t record traces that are moving faster than a certain
high speed, a couple of thousand miles an hour. But there are
still traces which need to be removed.
UFOs?
Sure. They’re often optically invisible, but usually show up on
radar. They’re also visible in ultraviolet... I don’t think this
is generally known by people.
So what can you tell us about the time loops?
Right. [long pause]
The situation with time loops is that there are a large number
of parallel timelines, lots of branches. There are no paradoxes.
[draws a diagram] If you go back in time and kill your
grandfather, that’s the grandfather paradox everyone talks
about, there’s no paradox. When you go back and change the past,
it creates a different timeline, which is a new branch of the
original one. On that timeline, you’d not be born and wouldn’t
exist, so that aspect of the paradox is true. Do you see? But on
this timeline, which you’re on here and now, you do exist, and
continue to do so. There’s no paradox. It’s simple… do you see?
You’re dealing with different branches of a kind of time tree.
No principles get violated. All future events are possibilities,
not certainties. That’s kind of pretty important, an
important... distinction. That's really all I can say about
that.
Do you know anything about
chemtrails?
OK. Chemtrails were developed by Edward Teller and are basically
the seeding of thousands of tons of microparticles of aluminum
on the upper atmosphere to try to increase the albedo of the
planet, the reflectivity of the planet, because of global
warming. Now, gold microparticles, real gold, were used once in
a similar situation on another planet, but I guess they had lots
of gold, and we used aluminum instead. Global warming is partly
because of the greenhouse effect, and that certainly makes
things worse, but most of it is because of increased solar
activity. Solar activity is the real problem.
Why isn’t this information in the public domain? It seems like
people should know and would like to know, and there’s no
security risk if what you say is true.
Scientifically, it’s just a total gamble. Not nearly enough is
understood. It may work, or maybe it won't. It could easily make
things worse. There may also be health side-effects, weather
side-effects, God knows what. It affects the whole planet and
here you have a unilateral, non-democratic decision, unconnected
with the political or democratic process, to launch a huge
technological special project that affects everyone on earth. If
that’s not controversial, I don’t know what is. The solution is
to keep it secret. It’s the usual kneejerk solution, too.
Will it work?
I don’t know.
Is this also connected with weather wars?
[pause]
Yes, there are
weather wars. The Air Force will own the weather
within two years.
What else can you tell us?
Read
The Report from Iron Mountain. Much of that is true. I was
working with a group down in [ ______ ]. They called us in and
passed out a report. The weird thing is that it wasn’t even
connected with what we were working on, and it came just right
out of the blue, out of nowhere, and none of us were expecting
it. The guy said, and I’ll never forget it because it struck me
as just wrong: “There are the wolves and there are the sheep,
and we are the wolves.” Then they told us to go and read the
report, and that was that.
There wasn’t any choice, and there still isn’t. The way they see
it is there are too many people, and, you know, they're right.
That's true. So they figure they need to eliminate them and
they're planning solutions to this. I happen to think it doesn’t
have to be that way. Apart from what I’ve mentioned so far about
the space-time problems, the problem is overpopulation. It’s as
simple as that.
There are
programs to reduce global
population for everyone’s benefit. Believe it or not, the intent
there is positive. It was put together by Kennedy way back then.
The RAND Corporation was involved, and one of
the Rockefellers,
I forget which one, probably Laurance, I think.
By killing people off?
Basically, yes. Artificial viruses that have been deployed using
a number of means and are hard to detect or identify and nearly
impossible to cure. Medical people in the public domain can't
identify what's happening.
How do you feel about this personally?
Very mixed. [pause]
As an individual flesh-and-blood human being, I’m appalled. And
as a scientist trained to look at things from a high vantage
point, a high overview, I have to say that I can understand the
thinking.
You have to understand that I’m not defending or condoning this.
It’s just a comment from an abstract scientific perspective. But
the problems we face on this planet are so huge that very few
people have the training or experience to view it all, to see it
all in the same field of vision.
My situation was different, and I got a chance to see a lot of
things because of the nature of my work. Most people don’t see
it all. But I've worked with many agencies, and I have the big
picture.
Do you know that it’s legal to test biological and chemical
agents against US citizens? It’s legal. You know, all that has
to be done is to get the approval of the mayor of the city, or
his equivalent in any area. Or some representative official.
No-one knows this, but it can be checked out. Go look it up.
It’s all carefully hidden away in the law somewhere, but it’s
all in the public domain. It's all there.
You’ve revealed a whole lot of extraordinary material here in
our conversation. What’s the most important message you’d like
to leave people with?
Look, I don’t want to shock anyone, but I’m not optimistic. The
problems facing us as a race on this planet are huge. I don't
believe most civilians are ready and able to comprehend and deal
with the sheer scale and complexity of it all. They have enough
trouble managing their everyday lives, and these problems are on
a completely different level. Overpopulation is really the
biggest issue. Everything else facing us is connected with this.
You see, I can understand the military taking matters into their
own hands. If there was full disclosure of all the problems, and
all the proposed solutions, do you really think it would help
any of us? I suggest the answer is probably not. It would just
complicate matters further.
But deep down I do feel that everyone should know these things,
or else I would not be talking with you. The essential message I
want to leave with is that I do actually hope and want to
believe that we as a people can handle all this, but sometimes I
wake up in the morning and doubt it, but deep down I want people
to know the important things that have been kept from us all.
But sometimes I do wonder. You don’t know what I haven't told
you.
Update 1
17 February 2007
We've had ongoing continued communication from 'Henry Deacon'
(see below). For Henry's background and for a transcript of our
first interview, please click here. It should ideally be read
first before studying the information which follows.
What we present here was not recorded in any interview. This is
our own compilation of what we consider important from a number
of conversations and written exchanges since our first meeting.
We know Henry very well now. He's a values-driven man of high
intelligence, acutely aware of the import of the information he
shares at considerable risk to himself. He's softly-spoken,
kind, and has a delightful sense of humor. He does not seek any
limelight. He is extremely concerned about the state of the
world... and the direction in which it seems to be heading.
Because of the professional posts he's held, he's in a
privileged position to be able to see everything that's
happening – which he describes as a bewildering complexity, all
the details of which are known or understood by very few people
– from an overview vantage point. The picture he presents is
complex, challenging, and significant.
Dan Burisch's testimony
In our first interview, Henry told us he had never heard of Dan Burisch. Because parts of Henry's story seemed to overlap with
Dan's, we strongly urged him to view our
three part Dan Burisch
video interview.
On 27 September, three weeks later, we received the following
e-mail. It's quoted verbatim and in its entirety.
Dan Burisch is telling the
whole truth.
I confirm this.
timelines and all
best wishes
This was of extreme importance, and
we checked this with Henry in person as soon as we could. It
appears that Dan's claims – as extraordinary and incredible as
they may seem – are true.
Henry did not comment on J-Rod, the treaties, or
Lotus, as he
has no experience or knowledge of those. But he did confirm that
the greatest secret in the classified world – about which many
insiders themselves have not been briefed – is that:
-
there is a
complex problem concerning alternative timelines
-
some of
the visitors are indeed humans from the distant future
-
there are significant issues with a possible future event which
may seriously affect the earth and its population
The last of these is the reason that all this has been kept so
highly classified, and why disclosure is so problematic.
Roswell
The Roswell visitors were future humans – as
Dan Burisch has
stated. They were not from another planet, but from a future
Earth – stepping (which is a better word than "traveling") back
in time to 1947 to attempt to deal with the problems which had
occurred in their history. Apparently, Dan was also correct in
that the Roswell visitors were from earlier in the future than
some other visitors who arrived subsequently. But Henry didn’t
give details or time frames.
The Roswell visitors were on a purely altruistic mission. They
did not have to do this, but chose to... out of compassion. But
the mission went disastrously wrong – not just because they
crashed (an accident caused by high-powered radar – later the
military realized this and adapted the radar as a weapon), but
because they had a device with them which was their only means,
as an orientation device in time and space, to get them home and
back to their own time.
The device was a little box, far smaller than the "Looking
Glass" that Dan Burisch and Bill Hamilton describe as being
subsequently utilized by military scientists in various
experiments. When the box was acquired and investigated by the
military, this became a catastrophe in itself. It made the
timeline problem many times worse, because this both introduced
the time-portal technology to us at the wrong time... and also
told the military what lay ahead.
Henry could not stress too strongly how totally calamitous for
us all
the Roswell incident was. It was a major, major setback,
right at the start of the future humans' project to help fix the
problem.
Since then, there have been continued attempts by the future
humans to remedy the exacerbated situation. This is what has
caused an overlay of timelines, creating a tangled complexity
which apparently is challenging for even the most brilliant
present-day minds to understand fully.
We asked Henry why the disks kept on crashing, almost year after
year. He said that it seemed strange that the visitors had not
evaluated the risk from radar before they returned in time, but
he explained it was just very dangerous for them to be here for
a variety of reasons, despite their advanced technology. Crashes
have been caused by many factors, including offensive action.
Importantly, Henry emphasized that the Roswell visitors were not
the Grays. (He did not mention who the Grays were.)
NOAA, the Dark Star, and global
warming
Henry at one point did some work with NOAA (the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration) and it was there that he learned
about what he called the “second sun”. This is a massive
astronomical object which is on a long elliptical orbit around
our own sun, on an inclined plane to the rest of the planets.
It’s now approaching, and is causing resonance effects on our
sun in various ways. A small organization within NOAA is aware
that this is a cause of the warming of all the planets, not just
the Earth. This information is classified, but has been known
for a number of years.
We told him about
Andy Lloyd's excellent 'Dark Star'
work,
which he had not seen before. We also offered to send him
Lloyd's book 'The Dark Star'; but he declined, saying that there
was a risk that it might 'front-load' him too much before he had
the chance to recall more information.
This issue is connected with the Roswell catastrophe described
above. The problems the future humans were attempting to address
were multiple, but principally – as Dan Burisch has stated on
many occasions – featured a possible event triggered by a
massive 'spike' of solar activity at some point in our currently
near future.
Henry, like Dan, is at pains to emphasize strongly that this
event is only possible (having been observed in
Looking Glass
devices in a possible future)... and currently is evaluated to
be unlikely.
Henry explains that the increase in solar activity is caused
only in part by the 'Dark Star', multiple factors being at play.
These are complex. Some of them are on a galactic scale, and are
associated with natural, periodic events which the Earth has
suffered through a number of times previously.
What makes this
particular time completely unique for our planet is that there
is a convergence of serious factors – such as carbon emissions,
overpopulation, and our propensity for choreographing war – all
of which combine with these major, cyclic and solar events to
simultaneously threaten the well-being of ourselves and the
biosphere.
Mars
Henry confirmed the
existence of a large manned base on Mars,
supplied through an alternative space fleet and also through stargates.
Signal non-locality
Henry told us that he had personal experience of interfacing
with a team which effectively conducted Alain Aspect's pivotal
and conclusive 1981 experiment to prove Bell's Theorem, under
the auspices of a classified project at Livermore in the late
1970s. The results obtained were never published in journals -
as is usual in the case of "black budget" research.
The mathematical physics is complex, but the technology
developed is now regularly used to communicate instantaneously
across vast distances.
The disk shot down at Hunter
Liggett
We asked Henry to tell us more about this event. He gave the
location of the incident: within a mile of the center of this
map. It occurred in late 1972 or early 1973. His team were
testing experimental laser weapons, targeting various materials
in the field environment. Suddenly a disk-shaped craft appeared
out of nowhere – measuring about 100 feet diameter by 25 feet
high. It was about 150–200 yards away.
Someone shot at it with Air Force
experimental laser which was under test at the time. The primary
laser system was contained and operated from the back of a
slightly modified M-35 2.5 ton truck called a "Deuce and a
Half". There was no visible external damage from what Henry
could see or remember, but the craft was disabled. Three small
child-like aliens (not classic “Grays”) were captured, alive and
in good health, and were transferred to a Nike base located in
the hills near Tilden Park, directly east of Kensington, CA.
All this happened very quickly and
was quite a shock to all concerned.
17 February, 2007
Update 2
2 May 2007
Our last communication from Henry was on 30 March, 2007. Since
then he has been totally silent, despite all our efforts to
re-establish contact. Prior to his last communication, he had
told us that he was being 'coerced', and that he feared he might
be obliged to cease communication with us.
Although he was very careful (and sometimes enigmatically so)
with his messages – which reached us through a variety of
sometimes very creative means – he was also under no illusions
about the capacities of some agencies to monitor information;
see below for details.
We continue to regard Henry as a good friend whom we’d grown to
like, admire and trust. We miss his wry messages, his sparkling
humor, and his strong principles and values. Wherever he is and
whatever he is doing now, we hope he is safe, and wish him well.
We assume that if he's still alive he'll be reading this page.
Henry, we miss the lassi! It just wouldn't be the same without
you.
What follows is a further compilation of information of
interest. Although some of it is literally incredible, we
believe he has always told us the truth.
Monitoring
Henry warned us that there exists advanced technology that can
monitor conversations even in the outdoors. He told us that
satellite lasers now have the capacity to pick up vibrations on
a person's clothing. Monitoring speech vibrations from a glass
window pane is elementary, and is older technology.
This is important for us all to understand: bugs no longer need
to be physically planted in someone's apartment. Cellphones can
also be activated to relay conversations, even when switched
off; the only true safeguard is to remove the battery. Our
conversations can be heard almost anywhere, at any time.. if the
agencies choose to listen in.
9/11
Henry told us that besides knowing way beforehand that something
like this was planned (see his first interview), he’d been
briefed about it in detail a few hours before it happened in his
place of work at the time. The briefing took place with a group
of colleagues. He reported being shocked not only at the low-key
way it was announced, but at the comparative apparent lack of
reaction of many of his colleagues. The purpose of the
announcement was so that when the employees heard about it on
the news later that day, they would not be alarmed:
“When you
hear this in the news later today, don’t panic, because this is
what’s going on.”
We are of course under no illusions about the importance of
this. Five years after the event, Henry may be the first insider
to come forward with confirmation that
9/11 was an inside job.
Further details:
-
The planes that hit the twin
towers were remotely controlled (over-riding the pilots, and
with software modifications that would permit tight turns
that would normally be impossible due to autopilot default
limit settings). The remote control was enacted from
thousands of miles away.
-
The plane that hit the Pentagon
was a small, remotely piloted Navy jet. A full-sized Boeing
757 could not have been used because the aerodynamic ground
effects would have prevented it coming in so low at full
speed without it having to slow right down as if to land.
-
The well-publicized cellphone
calls had been fabricated.
-
He also thought that control
over Flight 93, which either crashed or was shot down over
Pennsylvania, had been lost, and that that part of the plan
had gone wrong (there had been another targeted building,
but he did not know which one).
-
When we asked what had happened
to the passengers and the plane of Flight 77 (the plane that
supposedly hit the Pentagon), he replied that he did not
know.
-
Osama bin Laden had nothing to
do with any of it apart from the fact that he was a USG
asset.
He told us that that was all he
knew.
Multiple timelines
We received this e-mail message from Henry in February 2007. We
reproduce it in its entirety.
Do we exist on multiple
timelines?
Your reality, in one way, depends upon "your"
perceptions, awareness, selections... from a vast ocean of
"probabilities"... but this is only an extremely limited
model to work with in an attempt to conceptualize an answer.
The English language alone does not accommodate for
communicating an answer to this question.
Most humans in today's
Earth-bound world cannot grasp an answer to this question
due to lack of exposure to other aspects of "reality". The
question itself is not complete, again, due to the
constraints inherent in most world languages (the languages
being at best, related to four dimensions) (or on the other
hand, utilizing "time" as a part of the language(s)) and
possible non-exposure to other reality sets, by the person
attempting to ask and to understand the nature of so-called
timelines, etc.
The concept of timelines is only
a model attempting to explain what cannot be explained in
"words" here. There ARE other communication modalities
available to us here, which can aid in understanding certain
concepts. Explain colors to a person who has never had
sight. Explain this world, as you know it, to an unborn
child, who has active senses, but yet to put them to use in
our "world".
Remember the story of the
Flatlanders - or even Sphereland? At this moment, the focus
should be on waking the people.... preparing them for a
"reality" shockwave... to minimize suffering.
Best Wishes.
Stargates
Regarding Montauk, Henry said most of Al Bielek’s information is
correct. There are apparently several kinds of stargate,
notably:
-
the kind where you step
through a portal and leave the device behind
-
the kind where you take the device
with you
The latter he said was a bit like “Think about where you want to
go, and you’re there.” The mental interface is significant,
apparently. He confirmed that as far as he knew Dan Burisch’s
information about stargates was 95% correct, but the missing 5%
was that he had no knowledge of the large-scale Looking Glasses
Dan described. (We showed him Dan’s diagrams and also Bill
Hamilton’s source’s text.) Henry emphasized that this didn’t
mean they didn’t exist, because there was so much
compartmentalization – but simply that he had no knowledge or
experience of those devices.
We showed him Dan's diagrams in person. We watched him while he
examined them carefully.
Then he suddenly said:
“Did he tell you
about the one in Iraq?"
We asked him whether had he not heard
that part of Dan's interview. Henry told us that he’d not
finished watching the videos. We asked him what he knew. He said
the Iraq stargate was what the Iraq war was really all about,
that its location was one of the biggest secrets, and that the
war was at least partially about control of it. We asked him how
he knew all this – did he read it in a briefing document? No, he
said, not a briefing document.
The only thing he would say was that
it was "first-hand knowledge".
The distant future
Henry told us that in approximately 6,000 years time the Earth
will be practically barren, and there will be an attempt to
repopulate it. He said that large numbers of children have been
abducted from the present and taken to the future Earth, because
their genome is undamaged. (In future history the imminent
catastrophe significantly damages the human genome.)
He also confirmed that somewhat later than 52,000 years time,
the Looking Glass data seems to go blank and no further
information is accessible. This is is exactly what was stated by
Dan Burisch. (This information was given in a meeting. Henry
finished the sentence for us as we were asking the question.)
(Note: Henry clearly confirmed the existence of "Looking Glass"
devices which could "see" into the future, or into possible
futures. It was the details of the type of technology described
by Dan Burisch -
see this page - which Henry was unable to confirm
personally.)
Henry told us that he had thought that there was some kind of
barrier in place which meant that future humans were only able
to visit us at certain intervals of about 6,000 years. He
stressed that he didn't know much about this. Interestingly, a
quick calculation shows that concerning the two principal dates
frequently referenced by Dan Burisch, 45,000 = 7 x 6,500 and
52,000 = 8 x 6,500. This struck us as potentially significant.
We had wondered about why there had not been visiting future
humans from the intermediate periods of 46,000, 47,000, 48,000
(and so on) years in the future. Henry seemed to be offering one
explanation.
Incredibly and significantly, it seems that the Mayans (whose
famously accurate calendar ends in the year 2012) apparently had
access to information left to them by visiting time travelers.
An environmental threat
Henry very much wanted to visit Egypt. He was quite anxious
about it, and told us it was a problem. When we asked why, he
said that there was very little remaining time in which to
travel there. We pressed him for a reason, and he responded that
it was not connected with war or politics. We pressed him
further, and he eventually said simply: "an environmental
threat".
He refused to elaborate, nor would he reveal how it was
he had access to this information.
Underground and undersea bases
Henry confirmed that many undersea bases exist.
Chaotic resonating circuits
Henry elaborated on the chaotic resonating circuits he mentioned
in our first interview. He confirmed that they were relatively
cheap and easy to make, and that the information, in segmented
pieces, had been fairly widely available in a certain academic
community in the 1970s. He had retained no records of the
circuit diagrams, but intriguingly he said he was 80% confident
that he would be able to locate them if he spent time searching
public domain records in a particular university library.
We know the location but for
understandable reasons are not revealing it at this time.
Important contacts
Henry on several occasions referenced and strongly recommended
the work of
Bernard Pietsch,
Stan Tenen, and
Richard Hoagland.
He maintained that:
-
Pietsch knew everything
there was to know about the Great Pyramid
-
Tenen was an inspired genius
-
Hoagland knew a very great
deal of accurate information about the solar system
Mars
The story appears to be extremely complex, and that may be an
understatement. Henry fed us snippets on an intermittent basis.
These were sometimes very enigmatic.
What we were able to gather
together was this:
-
Henry told us that the Mars base
has a large population – 670,000 as of a few years ago. This
seemed a huge number to us. We asked if these were all
human. "It depends what you mean by human", came the reply.
The base has been in existence for an extremely long time
("tens of thousands of years"), and its population has waxed
and waned over the centuries. It lies "at the bottom of an
ancient seabed". It is "not far" from the location of this
NASA photo, taken by the 1976 Viking 2 lander on Mars'
expansive Utopia Planitia ("Nowhere Plain", sometimes
referred to as "Utopian Plain").
-
Henry stated that the most
recent NASA images, discrediting the notion of a "Face on
Mars", have been doctored, as have the colors of the Martian
sky on most officially released NASA photos. (It is
apparently more blue than we are permitted to believe.)
-
The Anunnaki are one part of the
mix. Henry referred to them a number of times as being
operational in present time. He said that they originated
from another star system, but he could not remember where.
The Anunnaki is our name for them, and they are the same
race referenced and described in
Zecharia Sitchin's work.
The Anunnaki themselves are split into a number of factions,
some of which are friendly, and others not. The most
sinister thing he alluded to was that one faction of the
Anunnaki sometimes preyed on human flesh, having acquired a
taste for it. Other factions of the Anunnaki sought to
prevent this. Such was the extreme nature of this piece of
information that (in conversation) Henry was obliged to make
repeated oblique references to it before we finally grasped
what he was trying to tell us.
Click on the image on the right to read a screen shot of an
e-mail we received which conveyed a very small part of this
story. Note Henry's emphasis on the word "appears" (typical
of his cautious and exact approach), and the typo in
"Enki ship". The e-mail is presented exactly as received.
(Related link appeared on image
right:
www.coasttocoastam.com/gen/page1925.html?theme=light)
-
Transport is by two means:
stargates for personnel and small items, spacecraft for
larger items of freight. The alternative fleet is codenamed
SOLAR WARDEN.
We had first heard of this from another source, and queried
Henry about the codename. We sent him two separate messages,
each simply of one word: SOLAR, and then WARDEN. We offered
no context, or reason for our communication.
The reply came immediately in three e-mails, each from a
different address. The first said MARS, the second said
ALTERNATIVE, and the third had as its subject "Not listed
here" and
gave this URL as its only content. We were
impressed.
-
Most controversially, Henry gave
several hints, on separate occasions, that he had been to
Mars himself. The first occasion was in conversation, when
he was talking about the base. We impulsively asked him if
he had been there.
There was a very long pause.
Eventually he smiled and said:
“I played a lot of ping-pong and
watched a lot of TV”.
He repeated this obscure allusion later on
two further occasions. Every way he referred to the base was
consistent with his having visited it personally.
Later, in separate conversation, he said that a journey through
a stargate was "instantaneous", and he gave the impression that
the experience of the stargate transition was at once
disorienting and exhilarating. He described the appearance of a
manmade stargate as a featureless gray surface. Natural
stargates, he said, have a different appearance which is much
harder to detect.
He appeared to agree with us strongly when we remarked that the
prime protection of claims of this nature was their sheer
unbelievability.
We have withheld this part of Henry's story thus far because of
the obvious risk that this may appear to discredit him in the
eyes of some. Intellectual honesty compels us to report this,
now that Henry appears to have been silenced.
