tonight I would like to turn to the speculation about an
imminent March 10th contact with the so-called
Enigma. This may be part of a tactic to saturate the
public with speculation about what is coming in to us.
Weíll see if this thing comes whizzing by the Earth,
or is just another Government disinformation ploy - that then
will be touted in the newspapers by the "good guys" on
the Government astronomy side, who claim to wear the white hats.
If Enigma were real, given the properties it has -
many times the mass of Earth, but smaller than our Moon, meaning
it is very dense - then it would already be a huge comet with a
comet tail and we would be watching it already.
So, if Enigma came by us, say between us and the
Moon, then yes it would cause some damage. It
would generate magma gravity waves in the Earth
and there would be massive electrical discharges between it and
the Earth which would excite exaggerated weather activity. It
would cause what I call "Himicanes" - that is,
hurricanes on land moving east. Of course hurricanes
are fueled by the electron belt that wraps around the equator.
But, my guess is that Enigma is not real.
And where did this story come from? Well you make your own
decision. By next broadcast, either we will be discussing the
effects or we will see Phil Plait rubbishing the
Enigma story. So, enough about Enigma.
On to Europa, moon of Jupiter.
Europa is a big torus - like a giant inner
tube. Itís like a mini solar system there. And like
Io it has a lot of sulfur dioxide.
These moons are moving in a non-uniform electric field around
Jupiter. The torus is of neutral atoms
and was viewed by Cassini spacecraft on the way to
is large enough to be a minor planet. NASA
says the material around it is being sputtered off the surface
of the moon by impinging high energy particles. And this somehow
stays in a ring around Jupiter. But really, it
wouldnít last long in the solar wind, which would simply blow it
Actually these are comet type activities around these
moons - pulling in material and then this tail follows them in
their orbit. These ions are neutralized by available free
electrons. So electrical forces are active in the solar system.
All this is consistent with the Plasma Discharge comet model
and they are certainly are not dirty snowballs as defined
by NASA. Itís proof of an electrical condition. If
it were sputtering - that torus would blow away. If not
generated continually and being drawn into Europa
with powerful electrical forces.
But people think, "Well, NASA has all these
Phdís, so how the heck could they be wrong."
Thatís because anybody who ever did speak up there in NASA,
According to the established view, the moons of
Jupiter are covered with ice. But if that was so then
every night we see it in the night sky, that moon should be a
blazing comet. So what is wrong with this picture?
Imagine this dirty snowball starts sublimating, gasses
come off and thus it develops a huge opaque shroud around it. We
cant see in and the nucleus canít see out. So then the Sun
canít get in to do itís thing of sublimating!
It should have been clear from the get-go that this dirty
snowball model does not work. But in the 50ís they
did not have the technology we have today. However, later when
we got out with Voyager etc., the data clearly showed
something was wrong.
In the last few years we just had two new planets NEAT
Hale Bopp. I was
thinking of renaming Hale Bopp "Aphrodite" - the
companion to Venus.
Planet X came by 42,000
years ago, with an entourage of smaller objects - one was
Venus, which took 600 years to nestle into itís current
orbit, passing Earth twice about 36,000 years ago.
The other companion which was ripped off was Hale Bopp.
So one member of this Planet X entourage became
Venus and the other Hale Bopp. And of
course we had the calendar changes because the earth had itís
Now NEAT-C2002v1 which just came by had a nucleus,
probably about the size of Mercury. No way was
that nucleus half a kilometer wide. This was a huge comet.
And of course, we now know it should have been called NEAT
2001, because SOHO is watching that since
2001, and it was seen by Hubble and other telescopes
the way, Hale Bopp was supposed to be 40
kilometers wide, but it was half the size of our Moon
- and the same size on itís way back out again, with about a
26,000 year orbit.
Friends in NZ and Australia, pleas
start tracking NEATv1, because the orbit has
I canít believe all the garbage on the Internet last week about
NEAT. The Disinfo was glowing. And the
NASA cover-up is bunk. NEAT was a huge
very excited comet, seen with the naked eye. So, how come it was
Because if people had looked at this they would say - Wow thatís
big! One woman came out of her office and thereís this huge
comet and next to the sun so bright. And I know a lot of people
viewed it in UV. This was one of the "blue
ones" referred to by the
Hopi Indians - it was
so charged NASAís SOHO even saw the
shimmer in the tail from the electrical action.
Nevertheless, in a little little pre-announcement on the NASA
SOHO site someone said they were expecting a nice solar
flare. I nearly went into orbit myself, when I read that. I
have pics of two comets in 2000, one was accompanied by one of
the largest flares ever, and back then NASA said
it was "totally unrelated."
Now all of a sudden they are EXPECTING as solar flare.
But then, all of a sudden the feed stops. For a day and a
half itís not there. When the feed comes back itís very
clear that NASA has faked the photos. And
the story going around is "some grad student" had
ENLARGED it with Photolab and pasted it in. Well Mitch
showed his true colors with that story, also Michael
Then on Feb. 28th here comes the final disinfo -
Phil Plait complains the alleged cover-up was
insulting to the NASA community. And he says three
people canít even keep a secret, so how could this be kept
secret? Well, what if two of them are dead? And heck they could
be Richard Harrison and Gene Shoemaker. Two
astronomers circa 1991-93 who had info and now are dead.
Another point. Who talks for NASA these days?
NASA through this entire process never once made an
official NASA news release. They got some guy - a
social anthropologist in the Space.com article.
NASA never has to say one word. How convenient.
They had cut the feed and they had altered the data and
people know this. But in this Space.com article Phil
is quoted about "neo-catastrophism" sites. Phil Plait
says "I donít work for NASA, no affiliation." But
who butters Philís bread? Who set up his homepage? Who
arranges his book screenings etc. Or is it all just out of the
goodness of his heart.
Of course he has his Ph.D., which means he doesnít know
jack-ícos, he had his nose in a textbook for 15 years. They
learn how to regurgitate what was taught, and frankly that is
what a Ph.D. is!
And then this Sommer guy said - representing Rand
Corp which would imply high senior spokesperson - "the
govt. should consider not telling the people about imminent
disaster." Then he says he was misquoted. And it turns
out he is a grad student!
It was so bizarre. Our news media has totally failed and that
why people listen to this show. You get real news here.
I want to mention too. I got an interesting e-mail saying "Iíve
gone back and done a study of the solar data and itís normal."
Well, we know that NASA has gone into all the
archives and rebuilt the data. Like with the
sunspot count last spring and summer. The sunspots
were off the charts. The live automated system would have
sometimes 100ís and a few hours later the file data would show
NASA has a whole program of falsifying data
that would alarm the public.
Just one note in relation to Planet X. When I say
I have cleared the sky in a number of areas, I mean that the
immediate danger from that area in eliminated for say six
months. And for maybe a 1 year period for a body of a larger
Soon our expedition will go down and look at the Southern
Hemisphere. We are going to clear the immediate future there