|
from
Exopolitics
Website
Was a Nuclear Missile Attack on Hawaii ...thwarted by a Secret Space Program? January 17, 2018
Residents near Honolulu,
the expected ground zero of any nuclear attack, fled for their lives
to more remote areas of Oahu expecting the worst.
Then after 38 minutes of
sheer terror for many all over the Hawaiian islands, residents were
notified by the emergency alert system that it was all a false
alarm.
Someone had pressed the wrong button according to local State authorities.
Residents were supposed to be reassured that the responsible individual would be reassigned. An inquiry has been launched by the Hawaii Governor David Ige.
Mainstream media coverage has exclusively focused on Hawaii State authorities explaining that the problem was one person pressing the wrong button.
According to an official timeline of events, U.S. Pacific Command notified Hawaii State authorities that there was no missile launch at 8:10 am. Local authorities subsequently attempted to inform the public via a number of means that the ballistic missile alert was a false alarm.
But it was only at 8:45 am, 38 minutes after the initial alert, that a second emergency alert was sent over the Public Alert and Warning System announcing the mistake.
Was the long delay between warning and the warning retraction received by Hawaii residents simply the unprecedented foul up of an emergency alert sent by State authorities, or was something else happening?
My wife and I have lived on the Big Island of Hawaii since 2004, and during our time here there have been a steady number of emergency alerts issued for hurricanes, tsunamis, flash flooding, and lava flows.
Sirens regularly wail at the start of the month to test the emergency alert system for these kinds of events, and more recently for a possible nuclear missile attack from North Korea.
The regular occurrence of destructive events and their consequences in the region have led to an emergency alert system that is second to none when it comes to providing timely and accurate information to Hawaii residents in potentially life threatening circumstances.
We regularly receive emergency alert updates after the initial event described in an emergency alert. So the explanation that it took 38 minutes to issue an update to the initial false alarm is very hard to believe.
The chances that the ballistic missile alert was a simple mistake by one person even further strains credulity.
One writer points out how the system is designed to prevent this precise mistake:
This is why alternative media reports of an intercepted nuclear missile attack needs to be considered, since it raises another scenario that better fits the sequence of events on that Saturday morning.
The first alternative news report appeared on the Operation Disclosure Blog site on January 14.
It was headed RV/Intelligence Report and said:
On January 16, another author came out saying that the Hawaii event was an intercepted nuclear missile attack.
After explaining how the emergency alert system is designed to prevent the kind of human error claimed by state authorities, s/he wrote:
Update 1/17/18
An additional alternative news media source corroborating key aspects of the thwarted missile attack against Hawaii is veteran journalist and orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Dave Janda.
He commented in a radio interview about what a "Deep Level source", who has never been wrong over the years he has known him, had told him about the Hawaii missile incident:
If the above scenario actually happened then it makes sense that an alert was generated after the initial missile launch.
Then, once the missile had been intercepted, local and federal authorities were informed immediately, only three minutes later.
The additional 35 minutes was probably due to the "short time" it took to find and take out the missile launch system, likely a submarine, to prevent another missile launch.
The all clear was then given to issue the additional emergency alert to Hawaii residents while covering up the nuclear attack and take down.
What adds credibility to this alternative scenario are photos of a number of UFO's seen over Hawaii 31 minutes after the second emergency alert. The photos show UFOs that display an advanced technology that may be craft belonging to a USAF run Secret Space Program that has broken away from Deep State control.
Another explanation is that the craft were extraterrestrial in origin and following a decades-long policy of secretly intervening to forestall nuclear weapons incidents, as contended by the author Solaris Modalis, who provided the photos' genesis:
While extraterrestrial intervention is possible, it is more likely that the highly advanced state of a USAF-run Secret Space Program was all that was needed to intervene to thwart the intended false flag attack.
In either case, the photos may explain how the incoming ballistic missile was shot down.
If our alternative scenario is correct, this raises a number of critical 'who', 'why' and 'where' questions.
As to the 'who question', both alternative news sources refer to a stealth submarine with ballistic nuclear weapons technology. Clearly this could only have been achieved by a nation or entity in control of submarines equipped with nuclear ballistic weapons.
The Deep State is referred to in the reports as the most likely culprit, possibly using a nation state proxy to be able to pin the blame on North Korea in a false flag event.
As to the 'why question', a possible answer lies in the December 21 Executive Order passed by President Trump to freeze the financial assets of all involved in human rights abuses and corruption in the U.S. and around the world.
By cutting off the life blood of major Deep State actors and proxy groups, the U.S. Military that is the real power behind the Trump Presidency, has declared financial war against the Deep State.
Furthermore, alternative news reports of Guantanamo military prison being expanded in late December 2017, to host Deep State VIP's detained by U.S. Special Forces, may have also been a catalyst for the Deep State to react.
It's very possible that the Deep State responded to these recent developments by launching a nuclear weapons attack against Hawaii, which hosts the largest concentration of U.S. military assets anywhere in the world.
If so, it is fortunate that the attack was thwarted and the culprits taken out, most likely by antigravity spacecraft belonging to a Secret Space Program.
This raises the question of whether there might be future "false flag" attacks by Deep State assets to initiate major regional conflagration and a possible World War III.
Such a possibility was alluded to by the anonymous whistleblower, Q Anon, who posted a cryptic warning on January 14 that implied the Hawaii event was one of a major false flag events this coming week.
On January 16, a New York Times report referred to another false alarm, this time in Japan where residents were warned by a major TV broadcaster to take shelter from an incoming ballistic missile:
Could the Hawaii and Japan false alarms be the first two attempts at major false flag events orchestrated by the Deep State that have been thwarted by the U.S. military and its "off-world" allies?
It's also possible that what really happened on January 13 (and Jan 16 in Japan), including the mainstream media explanation of human error, may have been intended as a threat to the U.S. military and Trump Administration to step back from the financial war and the extraction of Deep State VIPs taken to Gitmo.
It's hard to imagine the U.S. military and Trump backing down after their initiatives in late December 2017, especially if there really was a missile attack against Hawaii.
The possibility of potential false flag military attacks orchestrated by the Deep State gives powerful incentive to government authorities to cover up what really happened on the morning of January 13, and possibly also to Japan on January 16.
The possible involvement of a Secret Space Program, most likely acting alone or with extraterrestrial assistance, in thwarting false flag attacks on Hawaii and/or Japan provides confidence that future false flag attacks using conventional military technologies are unlikely to succeed...
The Secret Navy behind the...
Ballistic Missile Attack on Hawaii
In this article, I
analyze various sources describing the attack, and identify the
mysterious naval force that was most likely responsible for
launching the ballistic missile, which presumably was nuclear armed. In my above January 17 article, I listed three alternative news sites referring to sources that all said that a ballistic missile was launched against Hawaii by a stealth submarine.
The alternative news sources were,
The Operation Disclosure and Public Intelligence Blog sites point to an Israeli submarine as responsible, while Dr. Janda said it was a submarine belonging to a rogue Chinese Navy faction.
Further corroboration for the ballistic missile attack explanation comes from former Forbes Magazine writer, Benjamin Fulford, who says that according to his insider sources, there was a submarine based attack:
Both Fulford and the Public Intelligence claim that the ballistic missile was intended to simulate a North Korean attack suggesting the responsible submarine was in the vicinity of North Korea, either in the Sea of Japan or off the Japanese coastline.
In determining the type of missile attack against Hawaii, yet another source refers to a Hawaii tourist boat about 100 miles out at sea that saw what appeared to be a meteorite exploding in the air shortly before the Hawaii Emergency alert went out Saturday morning, January 13.
The additional source appeared as an update to the original Public Intelligence blogsite article about the Hawaii missile attack:
This additional Hawaii source is vital in understanding what happened since it reveals that the missile was coming down from the upper atmosphere following a ballistic trajectory similar to a meteor.
This helps confirm that a ballistic missile was involved rather than another type of nuclear delivery system such as a cruise missile which fly much closer to ground and have a far more limited range.
Of the sources cited so far, aside from Dr. Janda, all believe a faction of the Israeli Navy was behind the attack using a dolphin class submarine supplied by Germany.
The USS Liberty attack during the 1967 Arab Israeli war is often cited as an example of Israel launching a false flag attack against the U.S. to embroil it in wars against Israel's regional enemies.
In a private email received on January 19, former CIA covert operative and Marine Intelligence Officer, Robert David Steele, says that the attack was a,
In considering the possibility of a rogue Israeli submarine being responsible, it's important to review the armaments possessed by the class of submarines belonging to the Israeli Navy.
In a news story describing Israel's possession of Dolphin class submarines purchased from Germany, its armaments are described as follows:
Israel's Dolphin Class submarines can carry cruise missiles which are well suited for Middle East operations, rather than ballistic missiles which are better suited for long distance targets thousands of miles away.
Ballistic missiles require much larger "boomer submarines" to launch them, rather than the smaller Dolphin class submarines possessed by Israel.
The Dolphin 2 submarine is 69 meters (225 feet) in length, which is less than half the size of the Ohio class boomer submarines (170 meters/560 feet long) used by the U.S. Navy to carry Trident ballistic nuclear missiles.
Sea Launched Ballistic Missiles need vertical missile tubes as opposed to the more traditional horizontal torpedo tubes used for Sea Launched Cruise Missiles located at the front of the smaller Dolphin class submarine.
Consequently, it's unlikely that a renegade faction of the Israeli Navy launched the ballistic missile attack since their Dolphin class submarines simply don't have the capacity.
Furthermore, it's hard to imagine how a U.S. war against North Korea and/or China would advance Israel's national security interests, which are far more concerned about threats posed by major regional rivals such as Iran.
Janda describes a rogue faction of the Chinese Navy being responsible, and that after the missile had been intercepted and destroyed by the U.S.. Missile defense system, the regular Chinese Navy destroyed the submarine.
This explanation is perhaps the scariest to consider since the U.S. national security apparatus would almost certainly hold China responsible for such an attack despite any genuine factional divisions within the Chinese Navy.
The immediate U.S. response would have been, at the very least, a direct retaliatory nuclear attack against China's main regional ally North Korea, which would have been scapegoated for a Hawaii attack.
After destroying North Korea's military infrastructure, the country would have then been subsequently overrun and occupied by the U.S. Military and its South Korean ally in an analogous way to Afghanistan after the 9/11 attack.
China's strategic interests would have been severely setback in such a scenario.
It's hard to imagine any Chinese military commander, rogue Navy faction or not, would risk a nuclear retaliatory strike by the U.S. that would set back China's steady emergence into a global superpower over the next decade or so.
Patience is a characteristic that China's political leaders possess in abundance. Consequently, I find it unlikely that a rogue faction of the Chinese Navy was behind the ballistic missile attack.
So who then launched the attack against Hawaii?
For an answer we need to consider legendary Hawaii Senator Daniel Inouye who in 1987 described the existence of a shadowy government within the U.S. with its own separate military assets.
Inouye was clearly convinced of a very highly classified U.S. agency that had the independent funding and wherewithal to develop its own Air Force and Navy outside the regular chain of military command.
In contrast to the assets of the regular U.S. Air Force and Navy, this covert fleet of ships and aircraft would be "dark", in terms of its security classification.
It would therefore be appropriate to call it the "Dark Fleet" which is what secret space program insider Corey Goode says it is called by the U.S. military according to his confidential sources (Skype Communication Jan 18).
He says that it is separate to another "Dark Fleet" which is a Secret Space Program that operates in Deep Space.
I need to point out that in 2017, I personally met some of Goode's confidential Earth Alliance sources. They provided many documents to prove they are deeply connected to NATO security operations and the European intelligence community.
They have continued to provide Goode intelligence information since they consider him to be a genuine extraterrestrial contactee, and asset of a Secret Space Program Alliance known to exist by NATO officials.
What U.S. Government agency would have the ability to raise its own "Dark Fleet" outside the regular chain of military command and Presidential executive authority?
The only U.S. agency capable of doing so is the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
More specifically, we are talking about the CIA's Directorate of Operations (formally Clandestine Service) which runs all its global covert operations, where a Dark Fleet would have been developed to meet operational requirements.
The 1949 CIA Act comprised additions to those sections of the 1947 National Security Act that dealt with the creation of CIA.
The 1949 CIA Act gave a Congressional stamp of approval to the creation of a ‘black budget' it could spend without recourse to U.S. law as the following section make clear:
Essentially, this gave the CIA the power to generate large amounts of money through covert means and launder it however it wished through the Pentagon and the U.S. bureaucracy.
The funding was used for an unofficial "black budget" that by 2001 was estimated to be as high as $1.7 trillion annually.
In addition to
having the financial means, the CIA has long been developing its own
covert Air Force. This began in the mid-1950's when the
CIA established Area 51, as the location to develop future
fleets of spy planes with the aid of companies such as Lockheed,
which today is the world's largest defense contractor. In the 1960's the CIA began training personnel to develop skills necessary to operate its spy planes on U.S. aircraft carriers.
CIA documents confirm that the U.S. Navy was training the CIA on how to operate spy planes on their carriers:
Source: Central Intelligence Agency Online Library
The above document
went on to discuss how Kelly Johnson, Director of Lockheed's
Skunkworks, helped the CIA launch its U-2 spy plane from the USS
Kitty Hawk Another CIA document shows the Navy's reluctance to allow the CIA to use its aircraft carriers to carry spy planes in trouble spots like the Mediterranean, thereby creating the operational necessity for the CIA to eventually acquire its own aircraft carrier to carry fleets of spy planes around the world.
Source: Central Intelligence Agency Online Library
These official CIA documents support the conclusion that by the 1970's the CIA's Directorate of Operations had its own squadrons of spy planes, and would have acquired its own aircraft carrier out of operational necessity that it could operate anywhere around the world without any kind of government oversight.
As far as the CIA having its own submarines, a Washington Times article from January 3, 1985 shows that two ballistic missile submarines, USS John Marshall and Sam Houston were handed over to a 2000 man Special Operations Force.
It can be guaranteed that the CIA's Directorate of Operations would have similarly justified the acquisition of ballistic missile capable submarines for its own covert operations around the world.
With the CIA's role in generating multiple black budgets, it could easily have diverted some of these funds to defense contractors for building ballistic missile capable submarines for exclusive use in clandestine operations.
It's worth noting that Lockheed Martin builds the Trident II ballistic missiles for the Ohio class submarines currently possessed for by U.S. Navy.
As noted earlier, the CIA and Lockheed have developed a long and close relationship since their joint efforts to develop Area 51 for spy planes and other advanced technologies in the 1950's.
Therefore it is very possible that the CIA's Dark Fleet possesses Trident II ballistic nuclear missiles developed by Lockheed Martin.
Consequently, Inouye's claims of a shadowy government possessing its own Air Force and Navy is very feasible given what we know about the CIA's history, and official documents showing its military assets, training and close relationship with defense contractors such as Lockheed Martin.
The CIA had the independent funding to create squadrons of spy planes that could operate from an aircraft carrier with the necessary support craft that altogether constituted a CIA controlled aircraft carrier battle group that included nuclear submarines.
So was the CIA's Dark Fleet behind the ballistic missile attack on Hawaii?
I put this question to Corey Goode and he responded:
The CIA's Directorate of Operations has long been the primary asset of what Inouye called the Shadow Government, but today is referred to as the "Deep State".
Due to President Trump's December 21, 2017, Executive Order freezing the financial assets of all involved in human rights abuses and corruption, Trump was not only declaring war against U.S. global elites involved, but also against the funding sources for the CIA's covert operations.
The CIA's black budget is made possible by human rights abuses and corruption around the planet that provides almost unlimited funds for its covert operations, including its Dark Fleet.
Consequently, the CIA's Dark Fleet had the means, motive and opportunity to attack Hawaii with a ballistic nuclear missile that would embroil the Trump administration in a major regional war with North Korea and possibly China.
Significantly, on January 16, Japan's major public broadcaster also warned the public about an incoming ballistic missile attack. Once again, a false alarm was issued shortly after by government authorities.
It's quite possible that the same submarine responsible for the Hawaii attack, launched another missile attack, this time against Japan, presumably Tokyo. It was also brought down, probably by the same defense forces that tracked and destroyed the Hawaii bound missile.
Again, the purpose would have been to simulate a North Korean attack thereby triggering a major regional war.
Such a war would distract the Trump administration and U.S. military from going after Deep State assets, and tie down the U.S. in a serious regional confrontation. Thankfully, the U.S. Navy and Air Force, along with the USAF run secret space program, were able to neutralize the attacks on Hawaii and Japan.
The multiple sources and documents cited above lead to a remarkable conclusion.
A CIA created secret Navy launched ballistic missile attacks against Hawaii and Japan using a Dark Fleet created in the 1970's to support covert operations around the world.
Consequently, neutralizing the "Dark Fleet" and reigning in the CIA's Directorate of Operations must become a high priority goal for the Trump Administration and the Pentagon.
A major step in doing so is for the truth to be officially released about ballistic missile attacks against Hawaii and Japan.
|
