by Tyler Durden
January 12, 2022
Update (15:05 ET)
As more and more
information pours out of the
Project Veritas leaked military
documents, there appears to be a damning section in support of
Ivermectin as a Covid-19 treatment.
(identified as curative in April 2020) works throughout all
phases of illness because it both inhibits viral replication and
modulates the immune response."
Will DARPA confirm or deny...?
See the document below:
Marine Corp Major Joseph Murphy's Report to Inspector General of DoD
For full PDF document,
has obtained military documents hidden on a classified system (HERE, and
HERE) showing how EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in
March 2018, seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of
bat borne coronaviruses.
The proposal, named
Project Defuse, was rejected by
DARPA over safety concerns and the
notion that it violated the gain of function research moratorium.
However, according to the documents, NIAID, under the direction of
Fauci, went ahead with the research in Wuhan, China and at
several sites across the U.S.
ZH: and just today,
Project Veritas' Eric Spracklen...
D.C. - Jan. 10, 2022
Project Veritas has obtained startling
never-before-seen documents regarding the origins of COVID-19,
gain of function research, vaccines, potential treatments which
have been suppressed, and the government's effort to conceal all
documents in question stem from a report at the Defense Advanced
Research Projects Agency, better known as DARPA, which were
hidden in a top-secret shared drive.
DARPA is an
agency under the U.S. Department of Defense in charge of
facilitating research in technology with potential military
Veritas has obtained a separate report to the Inspector General
of the Department of Defense written by U.S. Marine Corp Major,
Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA Fellow.
states that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018,
seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat
The proposal, named
Project Defuse, was
rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it
violates the basis gain of function research moratorium.
to the documents, NIAID, under the direction of Dr. Fauci, went
ahead with the research in Wuhan, China and at several sites
across the U.S.
Here's my answer to
the question posed by James O'Keefe.
In the original
PDF guidance for the
2014 research pause of
into weaponization of SARS viruses there was an important footnote:
Government Gain-of-Function Deliberative Process
Funding Pause on Selected Gain-of-Function Research
Influenza, MERS, and SARS Viruses
PDF - page 2 - October 17, 2014
17, 2014 - U.S. funding of SARS to create a biological
weapon was paused due to the extreme risk of a
the pause allowed agencies within the U.S. government to
continue funding if they determined,
is urgently necessary to protect the public health or national
through 2020 the
Pentagon continued funding research in Wuhan, China.
discovery would explain why many top officials in the U.S. Defense
Department were against the Trump administration [with increased
severity after the COVID pandemic began].
- [An Election Year]
"after thorough deliberation and
extensive input from domestic and international stakeholders, the
NSABB [National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity] issued its
NSABB's central finding was that studies that are
expected to enhance Potential Pandemic Pathogen (PPP) have potential
benefits to public health but also entail significant risks.
NSABB recommended that such studies warranted additional scrutiny
prior to being funded."
Anthony Fauci is on the NSABB.
9, 2017 - [Four Days
after the Susan Rice Oval Office meeting with Obama, Biden, Comey,
Obama Administration re-authorizes funding for the
creation of SARS biological weapons.
"Adoption of these
recommendations will satisfy the requirements for lifting
the current moratorium on certain life sciences research
that could enhance a pathogen's virulence and/or transmissibility to
produce a potential pandemic pathogen (an enhanced PPP)."
workarounds, exceptions and plausible deniability for the
consequences, built into the original moratorium guidance in 2014,
the defense department was operationally permitted to keep funding
the biological weapons research in Wuhan, China.
The 2014 ban was a
funding moratorium in name only; however, it appears the funding for
U.S. research in North Carolina was stopped.
reauthorized in 2017, just before President Trump took office, was
the need to use "national security" as an excuse to continue the
It also appears funding of
SARS as a biological weapon
inside the U.S. (North Carolina) was now permitted again.
REFERENCES SO FAR:
If you accept that
the Pentagon would never spend to develop a biological weapon in
China (Wuhan Lab) unless they already had developed that weapon on
their own (North Carolina Lab), then the question about the release
of that weapon starts to take shape.
Remember, the State
Department was looking into the origin until
Joe Biden shut them
down and redirected the goal to the Intelligence Community.
Biden handed the mission to the
Branch of Government...
after a few months the IC said their results were "inconclusive."
[…] In one State Department meeting, officials seeking to demand
transparency from the Chinese government say they were explicitly
told by colleagues not to explore the Wuhan Institute of Virology's
gain-of-function research, because it would bring unwelcome
attention to U.S. government funding of it.
In an internal
memo obtained by Vanity Fair, Thomas DiNanno, former acting
assistant secretary of the State Department's Bureau of Arms
Control, Verification, and Compliance, wrote that staff from two
bureaus, his own and the Bureau of International Security and
Nonproliferation, "warned" leaders within his bureau,
"not to pursue
an investigation into the origin of COVID-19" because it would
"'open a can of worms' if it continued."
[…] In late
March, former Centers for Disease Control director Robert Redfield
received death threats from fellow scientists after telling CNN that
he believed COVID-19 had originated in a lab.
"I was threatened and
ostracized because I proposed another hypothesis," Redfield told
Vanity Fair. "I expected it from politicians. I didn't expect it
President Joe Biden's team shut down a closely-held State
Department effort launched late in the Trump administration to prove
the coronavirus originated in a Chinese lab over concerns about the
quality of its work, according to three sources familiar with the
of the State Department inquiry and its termination this spring by
the Biden administration - neither of which has been previously
reported - comes to light amid renewed interest in whether the virus
could have leaked out of a Wuhan lab with links to the Chinese
The Biden administration is also facing scrutiny of its
own efforts to determine if the Chinese government was responsible
for the virus.
"On Wednesday, Biden issued a
statement that he has directed the US intelligence community to
redouble its efforts in investigating the origins of the
Covid-19 pandemic and report back to him in 90 days."
The intelligence community failed to conclusively identify
the origin of the coronavirus following a 90-day investigation
ordered by President Biden, but experts are divided on why.
A report by the
Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) found that
officials were unable to rule whether the virus escaped from a lab
or spread to humans through an infected animal.
But the ultimate
conclusion reached by the $85 billion-a-year community was that it
would be unable to pinpoint the origin of the virus if China didn't
Read the rest of