by Catherine J. Frompovich
May 01, 2017

from ActivistPost Website



At one time most children were familiar with the Chicken Little story:




I assume that child's story was crafted to teach children not to jump to conclusions nor exaggerate situations, plus the importance of ascertaining the facts first before starting rumors.


It's a great little teaching tool for adults, too, I offer, especially in today's climate of pseudoscience, which has been given the sophisticated label "consensus conformity."


Wow! How impressive, but the science is faulty...

Recently, I came across a website discussing the genesis of our present-day 'chicken little scientists'.

Those scientists apparently morphed into reality as a result of strategic thinking by politicians and controllers who were determining a cause fitting in with the Hegelian Dialectic [problem-reaction-solution] for globalization politics or the New World Order domination by vested interests, e.g.,

According to the ICECAP Blogosphere:

The Club of Rome was an organization formed in 1968 consisting of current and former heads of state, UN bureaucrats, high-level politicians and government officials, diplomats, scientists, economists and business leaders from around the globe.


It raised considerable public attention in 1972 with its report The Limits to Growth.


The club states that its mission is,

"to act as a global catalyst for change through the identification and analysis of the crucial problems facing humanity and the communication of such problems to the most important public and private decision makers as well as to the general public."

In 1991, the club published 'The First Global Revolution' in which they decided:

"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming…would fit the bill…


It does not matter if this common enemy is "a real one or…one invented for the purpose."

[…] Meanwhile instead of engaging and supporting critical thinking and testing of hypothesis, there was concerted effort to paint anyone not supporting their theory as 'deniers' with not so subtle attempts to liken them to 'holocaust deniers' and those who denied the dangers of cigarettes.

Thus began the era of 'sanctified' pseudoscience or "consensus conformity," which has plagued all aspects of life and living ever since, especially when huge profits are to be made from consumer products which, in reality, are harmful but sold as 'inert', e.g.,

So, how was it that consensus conformity and pseudoscience were accepted as the 'norm'? 


An acculturation process and a resulting meme took off under the apparent tutelage of the Society of Environmental Journalists (SEJ), a 501(c)3 tax-exempt organization having in excess of 1200 journalists and academics in the USA, Canada, Mexico and 27 other countries whose apparent goal is to promote "false balance" in science! 


Here is SEJ's webpage on climate change.


Michael Crichton, author of State of Fear, made the comment,

"Let's be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. In science, consensus is irrelevant.


What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus." (Galileo, Newton, Einstein, etc).

He concluded:

"There is no such thing as consensus science. If it's consensus, it isn't science. If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period..." [1]

One of the issues ICECAP talks about in its article "EPW Critical Review Document decimates Obama administration and EPA pseudo science" is carbon dioxide (CO2), which most consensus 'science' seems to forget, is the basis we learned in biology, chemistry and physiology:

it's necessary in the life cycle on Planet Earth!

I want to quote directly from ICECAP's article because I've not seen CO2 discussed as they have:

CO2 is necessary to life on earth. It is in fact plant food, and makes possible the process of photosynthesis.


Photosynthesis is the process whereby plants using light energy from the sun convert carbon dioxide and water to glucose sugar and oxygen gas through a series of reactions.


The general equation for photosynthesis is:

Carbon dioxide + water = light energy => glucose + oxygen
6CO2 + 6H2O = light energy => C6H12O6 + 6O2

Humans exhale CO2 at a rate of approximately 40,000 parts per million (ppm). Humans inhale CO2 at the rate it currently exists in the atmosphere, which is just below 400 ppm.


Accordingly, humans exhale CO2 at a much higher rate than they inhale.


Why is it "The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the most daring liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to tell them the truth," as H.L. Mencken so eloquently stated.

All the above leads up to asking why no one - especially the U.S. Congress - plus ICECAP, seems to want to discuss,

  • Solar Radiation Management (SMR) [2-3]

  • toxic chemtrails [4]

  • weather geoengineering patents [5]

  • the Air Force's plan to own the weather by 2025 [6], the overwhelming sky graffiti laid down by specially retrofitted-planes to spray toxic chemicals into the troposphere. [7-8]


It would seem many "Chicken Littles" are running around telling all sorts of stories about climate change but none acknowledge what is above their heads in the sky. 


The sky is not falling, but what falls from the sky is not an acorn - they're toxins galore, aluminum chaff and other particulates, some proffered to contain radioactive materials.


Isn't it about time we find out the extent of the sky's poisoning?