by Susanne Posel
June 20, 2012
Fritz Vahrenholt, a German green energy investor, says he has
reassessed his position on man-made climate change.
Vahrenholt has been a professor in
the Department of Chemistry at the University of Hamburg since 2009.
He served as a senator for the environment in Hamburg, Germany
between 1991 and 1997, and was a member of the “sustainability
advisory board” to chancellor Schröder and Merkel in
2001 to 2007.
Speaking at the 3rd Global Warming Policy Foundation
Annual Lecture at the Royal Society in London, Vahrenholt was
RWE Innogy, one of Europe’s largest
renewable energy corporations.
Vahrenholt, who reviewed the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) most
recent report on renewable energy,
noticed that there was an obvious lack of scientific data to support
A prominent member of Greenpeace, a
UN propaganda arm disguised as a proponent of environmental
concern, edited the final version of the IPCC’s report.
The IPCC’s report, according to Vahrenholt, is littered with
falsities and a complete disregard for natural factors that would be
considered in fluctuating climate such as Earth’s.
Vahrenholt states that:
“Real, hard data from ice cores,
dripstones, tree rings and ocean or lake sediment cores reveal
significant temperature changes of more than 1°C, with warm and
cold phases alternating in a 1,000-year cycle.
These include the
Minoan Warm Period 3,000 years ago and the Roman Warm Period
2,000 years ago.
During the Medieval Warm Phase
around 1,000 years ago, Greenland was colonized and grapes for
wine grew in England. The Little Ice Age lasted from the 15th
to the 19th century.
All these fluctuations occurred
before man-made CO2.”
The late Gerard Bond, marine
geologist and professor from Columbia University,
analyzed climate reconstructions of
the North American deep-sea sediment cores, found that,
“the millennial-scale climate cycles
ran largely parallel to solar cycles, including the Eddy Cycle
which is - guess what - 1,000 years long.”
Bond surmised through decades of
variations in solar activity - the
appearance of sunspots and changes in the emission of solar
radiation - were directly causing palatable effects on the Earth’s
global temperature. The heating and cooling of the Earth coincided
with the activity of the sun.
The sun determines the Earth’s temperature, as proven from
real-world observations over the past 10,000 years.
With the introduction of man-made carbon dioxide emissions into the
atmosphere beginning in the 1850’s, the CO2 level has
only risen 11 percent; which is nearly negligible.
Empirical data has shown that pre-industrial carbon emissions were
dependent on solar activity. This global warming was estimated by
scientists as 1 degree Celsius. As far as the IPCC is concerned,
this statistic could, and has, been manipulated to justify their
agenda. However the account of the solar magnetic fields doubling
over the last 100 years was completely ignored because it disavowed
their scheme to blame carbon dioxide levels on human influences.
Solar activity, CO2 levels and Earth’s surface
temperature are interlaced factors defining climate parameters.
As modern man has been using fossil
fuels which disburse carbon dioxide, it made perfect sense for the
IPCC to turn this obvious fact into an attack on man through
fear-mongering and propaganda while suppressing natural processes.
The infamous computer models used by the IPCC to justify their
claims that CO2 levels are a direct causation of
anthropogenic impact and regard solar influence as negligible.
The IPCC inserts an “unknown amplifying
mechanism” to explain away observed solar activity and its effect on
the Earth’s overall temperature.
a Danish physicist, has devised a
computer model that takes into account the sun’s direct influence on
the Earth. While his research is still in its infancy, the
projections promise to clarify how much of an influence the sun
“The IPCC’s current climate models
cannot explain the climate history of the past 10,000 years. But
if these models fail so dramatically in the past, how can they
help to predict the future?”
Considering how weak an influence CO2
is on the climate, as observational data concludes that it would
only generate “a moderate warming of 1.1°C per CO2”, the
IPCC’s assumptions are over-blown.
They fail to include water vapor and
cloud effects which intensify solar amplification. CO2
needs an amplifier to become the aggressive agitator that the IPCC
would have everyone believe.
The alarmist assertions that temperatures will rise to 4.5 degrees
Celsius by a magically doubling of CO2 in the atmosphere
is scientifically unfounded.
The solar magnetic field patterns have
lowered significantly in the past 150 years, resulting in an obvious
de-intensification to be observed in the decades ahead. In reality
this would mean that global warming would stop and gradually reverse
by 2030 to 2040.
This fact proves the IPCC’s assertions to be completely false.
A global climatic catastrophe that the IPCC claims is coming is not.
And the scientific community’s efforts are being wasted in the
propaganda of an overheated planet, when they should be working
toward understanding how Earth is affected by its solar environment
with an impartial and open mind.
To fully understand these implications:
Comprehensive research must be
attributed to natural climate drivers
The warming “trend”, if viewed
as a pause in the temperature of the Earth, could give us
“time to convert our energy supply in a planned and
In the UK and Germany, major efforts by
the government have been taken to utilize sustainable energy with
the advent of wind turbines and solar panels that not only cut
economic costs in the long run, but fully utilize the potentials of
our natural resources while facilitating the continuance of our
solar energy is replacing nuclear
as the nation plans to shut down all nuclear reactors by 2022.
The solar power delivered to the German national grid is 50% of the
nation’s total energy quota, said the director of the
Institute of the Renewable Energy Industry.
The German government has invested quite a bit of money in
restructuring their nation’s energy infrastructure in an attempt to
move away from nuclear energy. They can currently generate over 4%
of their energy needs from solar power.
The German government will also invest in wind and bio-mass as
alternative forms of renewable energy.
exposures like Climategate and the
advent of skeptics to man’s direct causation to the ups and downs in
the Earth’s temperature,
the global Elite and their front for one
world government, the UN, have hit a road block. Scientific proof of
Perhaps Vahrenholt’s appearance at the globalist think-tank, the
Royal Society, is a proof that they are beginning to alter their
If fearing the public by decrying global
catastrophes due to man-made global warming is no longer effective,
then it might be that the global Elites are shifting their public
agenda, inventing more subversive propaganda that appears to support