Back to Babylon

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei

There is so much to know' before the invasion of Iraq in 2003 can be fully understood and it goes back a long way. The idea that the conquest of Iraq was decided in a matter of weeks because of the imminent-danger to tl1e world of Saddam Hussein should insult the intelligence of a pea: It was .part of a long planned strategy for global conquest.


In 2003 we had the Bush family in the White House, Dick Cheney as Vice President and Colin Powell as Secretary of State, and a United States international 'coalition' went to 'war' with Iraq. In 1991 the Bush family was in the White House, Cheney was Defense Secretary and Powell was head of the US forces as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and a United States international coalition' went to war with Iraq.


If you add together the casualties from the initial conflict, and the economic sanctions and bombing that followed, the '91 Gulf war cost the lives of a million Iraqi children, even without the child casualties, immediate and long-term, of the invasion of 2003. The Gulf War of father George Bush, like the latest one fronted by his idiot son, was a coldly manipulated set-up.


The apparent cause was a dispute between Iraq and Kuwait, a country that has been under British and Illuminati control back to the days when the economic potential of oil was discovered. Iraq has one of the world' s larges oil deposits and has attracted the constant attention of the US and British elite. In fact, countries like Kuwait, Iraq and others in the Middle East, were created by the British and their fellow European powers drawing lines in the sand. Kuwait is a dictatorship, an unpleasant one, and the idea that the Gulf War was to 'free' Kuwaitis just as ridiculous as the claim that the 2003 invasion of Iraqi was to 'liberate' the people.


After the first Gulf conflict what happened?


Saddam was left in power in Iraq and the Kuwaiti royal dictatorship was brought back with American and British support to continue their policy of the murder and torture of 'dissidents' who campaign for little luxuries like freedom and a say in the running of their own country. Saddam Hussein, the designated villain of both conflicts, was in fact one of the gang. He was a member of the elite Safari Club, which began as a consortium also involving SAVAK, the CIA-connected secret police of the Shah of Iran; Anwar Sadat, the later assassinated.


President of Egypt and Saudi Arabian Intelligence. It has been implicated in countless coups in Africa to further its goals and is heavily involved in arms trading and supply. Out of the Safari Club came the Pinay Circle, or Le Cercle, named after the French Prime Minister, Antoine Pinay. He was a major Illuminati asset who attended the first official meeting of the Bilderberg Group at Oosterbeek, Holland, in May 1954.


Others involved with Le Cercle included the Habsburg family, a major Illuminati bloodline. To give you an idea of its make-up. and range of influence, the Le Cercle membership has included:

  • Nicholas Elliot, a department head at Britain’s MI6;

  • William Colby, a former director of the CIA;

  • Colonel Botta of Swiss Military Intelligence;

  • Stefano Della Chiaie, a leading member of the Italian Secret Service

  • Giulio Andreotti, Henry Kissinger's friend, the former Italian Prime Minister from the notoriousP-2 Freemasonry lodge.

No doubt neo-con Michael Ledeen knows him well; Silva Munoz, a former minister for the fascist Franco in Spain and a member of the elite secret society within the Roman Catholic network, Opus Dei; Franz Josef Strauss, the German Defense Minister; and Monsignore Brunello, an agent to the Vatican.


In America, one of the Le Cercle fronts is alleged to be the CIA-backed Heritage Foundation in Washington. Look at the potential for such an organization to be a coordinating force between apparently different agencies and countries to achieve a common aim. Le Cercle and the Safari Club are basically the same entity, which is why, as the Wall Street Journal reported on August 16th 1990, it was the CIA who supported the Ba'ath Party in Iraq and orchestrated a coup that installed Saddam Hussein as dictator in 1968, just as they did with Colonel Gaddafi in Libya.


But, it is important to remember that everyone is expendable to the cause if tl1eir subsequent removal best serves the agenda.

Bush -Saddam connections

Father George. Bush had more than political associations with Saddam Hussein before the 1991 Gulf conflict. Bush had considerable involvement with the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI), according to the Chicago journalist, Sherman Skolnick, who made a detailed study of the bank. The BCCI, or the Bank of Crooks and Criminals International as it was rightly dubbed, crashed in 1991 amid an enormous-scandal that cost its customers multi-billions. One of the controllers of the bank Khalid bin Mahfouz.


He was named by the Clinton State Department as funder of Mr of Osama bin Laden and he was also an investor in Harken Energy, one of boy George Bush's oil companies {see Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster). James Bath a close friend of George W. Bush for decades was the Texas representative of Bin Mahfouz.


The purpose of the BCCI was to wash drug money and provide a channel for the funding by government agencies like the CIA of the terrorist groups that are used to serve the agenda. Sherman Skolnick has claimed publicly, including an interview on Radio Free America, that father Bush, Saddam Hussein and others, used the BCCI to split $250 billion in oil 'kick backs', the skimming-off of money paid by western oil companies in the Gulf. Other researchers and insiders have said the same.


Skolnick claims that the records implicating Bush in deals with Sad dam and former Panama President Manuel Noriega were in the hands of the Bank of England and that the money was channeled through the BCCI and Banca Nazionale del Lavoro (BNL) branches in the USA.


Henry Gonzales, the chairman of the House Banking Committee, identified links between the BCCI and BNL. Skolnick told interviewer Tom Valentine on Radio Free America:

"[The BCCI] ... was formed in the 1970swith seed money from the Bank of America, the largest shareholders of which are the Rothschilds of Chicago, Paris, London and ,Switzerland , .. The bank is also linked to the financial affairs of former President Jimmy Carter and his friend, and one-time budget director banker Bert Lance. '

"Some of the ... Democrats who have been involved in this whole affair have been , published, for example, in the May 3rd issue of the Wall Street Journal. During the 1988 presidential campaign, additionally, BCCI was one of the major financiers of the Michael Dukakis campaign ... BCCI financed the Democratic Party in the United States and arranged deals for Republicans outside the United States."1

Skolnick said records detailing the alleged Bush-Saddam deals were held in the Chicago branch of the BCCI, which was seized by the Federal government in 1988.


He went on:

"The same bank has records showing joint business ventures between General Manuel Noriega, former dictator of Panama and George Bush. In January of 1990, the Federal prosecutor in Tampa had former top officials of Florida's branch on trial. They were allowed to escape prison with only a slap on the wrist and a small penalty. Here's why: they told the Justice Department that if they were going to prison, they had documents from their bank showing that George Bush had private business ventures through their bank with a series of dictators including not only Saddam and Noriega, but others as well ...

" ... Saddam's oil was shipped to Texas. In 1985 a Texas jury, at the behest of Pennzoil, issued the largest damages verdict in American history against Texaco. Pennzoil claimed that Texaco damaged them in a deal with Getty Oil. Who owns Pennzoil? [Father] George Bush and his friends ... as a result, Texaco fell under the domination and supervision of Pennzoil. Where did the kickbacks to Saddam reportedly come from? They came from deals between Texaco and its subsidiaries purchasing oil from Iraq." 2

Who supplied Saddam's chemical weapons? The USA - didn't they Donald?

One of the loudest voices calling for the 2003 invasion of Iraq was the Defense Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, a man whose inability to tell the truth never ceases to stagger. Yet this same Rumsfeld was sent to meet Saddam Hussein by the Reagan-Bush White House in 1983 to arrange for the supply of chemical and biological weapons to Iraq for the war against Iran, which Iraq started in 1980 and continued for eight devastating years.


These US-supplied 'weapons' included anthrax and bubonic plague cultures.


Conspiracy theory? No, no, this information is contained in declassified US State Department documents that came to light in late 2002.


Rumsfeld's meeting with Saddam, preceded by a warm handshake, was part of the Reagan-Bush (in other words Bush) policy of close cooperation with the Iraqi dictator. The documents reveal that the United States increased arms supplies to Saddam even after he had used US-supplied poison gas against the Kurds in 1987 and 1988.3


President Boy George Bush and Tony Blair constantly repeated in 'justifying' the 2003 invasion of Iraq that Saddam had used chemical weapons "against his own people" when, in truth, the US and Britain had supplied the means to do it. This US support for Saddam continued for seven years and only a week before Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990, the US ambassador to Baghdad assured him that the then President father George Bush "wanted better and deeper relations". An investigation in 1994 by the Senate Banking Committee disclosed that dozens of biological agents were shipped to Iraq in the mid~80s under license from the US Commerce Department.


These included strains of anthrax that Rumsfeld, Bush and Powell cited in 2003 as one of the reasons they must invade Iraq. A month before Rumsfeld's visit to Baghdad, George (Illuminati) Shultz, the Secretary of State, was given intelligence reports showing that Iraqi troops were resorting to "almost daily use of CW (chemical weapons) against the Iranians".4


Rumsfeld claimed he had "cautioned" Saddam about the use of chemical weapons at the 1983 meeting. So why supply them in the first place? Once again Rumsfeld is lying. Of course he is; he's speaking isn't he? When Rumsfeld's lie was contradicted by the declassified State Department note of his meeting with Saddam, a Pentagon spokesman said that Mr Rumsfeld issued the caution to Tariq Aziz, the Iraqi Foreign Minister. If you are caught out on one lie, what do you do? You tell another.


Howard Teicher, a former National Security Council official during the Reagan Administration, said in a sworn affidavit that the United States,

"actively supported the Iraqi war effort by supplying the Iraqis with billions of dollars of credits, by providing military intelligence and advice to the Iraqis, and by closely monitoring third country arms sale to Iraq to make sure Iraq had the military weaponry required".5

Teicher said that William Casey, the former CIA Director, supplied Saddam with cluster bomb through a front company in Chile.

Who supplied North Korea with nuclear technology? Donald Rumsfeld's company

But while we are on the subject of Rumsfeld, there's more. In the year 2000, he was a director of the European engineering giant ABB when it sold nuclear reactors to North Korea in a deal worth $200 million and this was the same nuclear capability cited by Rumsfeld, Bush and Co in 2002 as proof that North Korea was part of an "axis of evil' that had to be confronted.6 Rumsfeld was on the ABB board for eleven years until he left to join the Bush administration in 2001.


At the time of the nuclear deal ABB's then chief executive Goran Lindahl, announced a "wide-ranging, long-term cooperation agreement" with the communist government. The type of reactors involved produce plutonium that needs refining before it can be weaponised. One US congressman and critic of the North Korean regime described the reactors as "nuclear bomb factories".7


When questioned about this outrageous hypocrisy, Rumsfeld's office said that the defense secretary did not "recall it being brought before the board at any time".8 Still more diplomatic amnesia. Sorry, lying. A spokesman for ABB said that all board members were informed about the deal. It is worth emphasizing this again:

These liars and cheats are the very same people who have told you what happened on September 11th, who did it, and how.

Father Bush funded Saddam

The public were also not told that it was the Bush government that had funded the very Saddam military that father George sent US troops to fight in 1991. Much of the funding was channeled through a branch of Italy's Banca Nazionale del Lavoro (BNL) in Atlanta. Congressman Henry Gonzales exposed the BNL scandal in 1991 after he noticed that this little branch of the Italian government bank had loaned Iraq $5 billion.


This money was dispatched to Sad dam after November 1989 when the Bush White House guaranteed bank loans to Iraq if they were to be used for the purchase for US farm products. If Saddam defaulted, the US taxpayers picked up the tab for"the loan and, since he was always defaulting, that was obviously going to be the outcome from the start. As planned, Saddam spent the money on arms, including purchases from the Matrix Churchill machine tool company in England.


This company was the subject of a court case in which the British government was implicated. Although many US investigators warned Bush that the money was being used for arms, the loans were allowed "to continue. The aim was obvious" when you look of the other evidence. Bush was doing the same as his father did with Hitler. He was funding an aggressor so he could start-a war with him.


Some of the money was spent on buying poison gas from a CIA front called Cardeon Industries in Chile.9 When the war started, Saddam defaulted on the loans and the US taxpayers footed the bill for Iraq to fight their own sons and daughters. The cover-up of this, as usual, led to the targeting of the small fry. The whole thing was blamed on the bank manager at the BNL's Atlanta branch, Christopher P. Drogoul, who could never have sanctioned that sort of money without the highest authorization.


A guy called Peter Kawaja said in an American radio interview that he was involved at one time with Product Ingredient Technology in Boca Raton, Florida, and with Ishan Barbouti International (IBI), the builder of Pharma 150, the chemical and biological weapons complex in Rabta, Libya.10 His experiences led him to investigate what was going on.


He said he went to the CIA and FBI and operated for the US government under a code name because they told him these people were international terrorists and that they were going to prosecute them. Kawaja said that he did his own investigation, however, which included "bugging telephone lines, buildings, and certain other locations throughout the United States".


He said he,

"intercepted communications to the Commodity Credit Corporation and the Banca Nazionale del Lavoro (BNL). Kawaja said he saw the letters of credit of the BNL, which , came from Switzerland, and a lot of other communications regarding the Gulf War that was to come".

He said he recorded calls going to and coming from Baghdad, to and from the United States and London, CIA, FBI, FBI counterintelligence, US Customs, certain politicians and numerous other individuals.

"This is my information", he said in the radio interview. "It is not second-hand."

US District Judge Marvin Shoob said the claim that the Atlanta branch of the BNL could 'loan $5 billion to Iraq without the approval of the head office in Rome could only come out of "never-never land".


The judge said of manager Drogoul and four other employees at the branch:

“[They] were pawns or bit players in a far larger< and wider ranging sophisticated conspiracy that involved BNL-Rome and possibly large American and foreign corporations and the governments of the United St~, England; Italy and Iraq ... smoke is coming out of every window. I have to conclude that the building is on fire." 11

This is the last thing the father Bush administration and the Illuminati wanted to hear. Judge Shoob was removed from the case and replaced by Judge Ernest Tidwell, who refused to allow any evidence to be presented about the CIA and the Bush-White House involvement in the bank. Drogoul was persuaded to plead guilty even though he wasn't.


The funding of the Iraqi arms build-up before the Gulf War and the supplying of weapons involved the Bush administration, the British government, the Italian government, the Soviet Union and other leading governments and corporations controlled by the Illuminati. One of the network of Illuminati private 'armies' is called the Wackenhut Corporation and investigative journalist John Connolly exposed in a Spy Magazine article12 that Wackenhut had been involved in the arming of Iraq before the first Gulf War by transporting the means to produce the very chemical weapons that father George Bush and Co were saying posed such a threat to the world.


George Wackenhut, a former FBI operative, started the company with other FBI associates in 1954 and its board has been packed over the years with recruits from the FBI, CIA and the military. It has since merged with Group 4 Falck, the world's second largest provider of Security Services.


George Wackenhut is a long-time friend of father George Bush and has contributed generously to his political campaigns and those of boy George and Florida governor Jeb Bush.


Journalist John Connolly wrote:

".... After a six-month investigation, in the course of which we spoke to more than 300 people, we believe we know that the [Wackenhut] truck did contain equipment necessary for the manufacture of chemical weapons and where it was headed [in the Winter of 1990] to Saddam Hussein's Iraq. And the Wackenhut Corporation, a publicly traded company with strong ties to the CIA and federal contracts worth $200 million a year was making sure Saddam would be getting his equipment intact." 13

The supply of weapons and money involved another familiar name, Henry Kissinger, the former Secretary of State and National Security Advisor to Richard Nixon at the time of the Watergate scandal and a genocide maniac who is now threatened with arrest in several countries for war crimes.


As early as 1984 his company Kissinger Associates was arranging for loans from the BNL to Iraq to finance its arms purchases from a little-known subsidiary of Fiat, which was headed by major Illuminati initiate Giovanni Agnelli. Charles Barletta, a former Justice Department investigator, was quoted about this in the US Spotlight newspaper on November 9th 1992.


The report said:

"Barletta added that Federal probers had collected dozens of such incriminating case histories about the Kissinger firm. But Henry Kissinger seems to possess a kind of immunity. I'm not sure how he does it, but Kissinger wields as much power over the Washington National Security bureaucracy now as' in the days when he was the Nixon administration's foreign policy czar. He gets the pay-off; others get the blame. Kissinger , will remain unscathed until Congress finds the courage to convene a full-dress... investigation into this Teflon power broker."

"We love you Sad, go get 'em, boy"

Saddam Hussein was encouraged by the American and British governments to go to war with the CIA/British intelligence-imposed regime of the Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran in 1980. The war dragged on for eight years amid appalling suffering and loss of life.


But it was good for the oil, banking and armament cartel (all controlled by the Illuminati) and for divide' and rule. In 1990-91 Saddam would be used again, knowingly or otherwise, to start another war in the Gulf, another conflict planned long before.


Author and researcher George C. Andrews reported:

"A little known fact about the Gulf War is that one month before our Declaration of War on December 15, 1990, Secretary of State James Baker, signed the US Army Report from the 352nd Civil Affairs Command on the New Kuwait [unclassified, and therefore available to those interested]. This report describes in detail how extensively Kuwait will be destroyed, how the oil wells will be set on 'fire and it will ail be rebuilt 'better than before', with despotism, instead of democracy, even more entrenched than it had been before. The report includes a list of US corporations who want be assigned the profitable task of rebuilding Kuwait and extinguishing the oil fires, as well as the Arab names they will be operating under. [Exactly the same was done before the 'war' in Afghanistan and the 2003 invasion of Iraq.]

"Why have none of his political opponents thought of asking the obvious questions ... [such as] ... Why are the huge business deals between Bush and Hussein still off-limits to the public's right to know?" 14

To readers of my books, the answers to these questions will be obvious.

The sting

On July 25th 1990, Saddam Hussein met with the US ambassador in Baghdad, April Glaspie, who told him she was acting on the instructions of President Bush. She said the Bush government had "no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflict like your border disagreement with Kuwait". Glaspie added that she had instructions from the President to seek better relations with Iraq. She then left for a summer holiday, another indication to Saddam that the Americans were not interested in his plan to invade Kuwait.15


Tuning is everything to the Illuminati. They have a specific agenda with a specific timescale. As former Blair cabinet minister Clare Short has said, the date of the second invasion of Iraq was known long before it happened and events were manipulated to hit the deadline. This was the reason for the weapons inspectors of H. Blix being denied the time to complete their inspections. It was the same in 1991.


Suddenly father Bush changed his stance and labeled Saddam "the new Hitler". He said the Second World War had shown that appeasement of such people was not the answer. He might have added that it is also not the answer to fund both sides in a conflict and to help finance Hitler's war machine, as his father had done. For those who knew the game plan, it was easy to see what was happening.


Bush announced on November 8th 1990 that the forces in Saudi Arabia would be substantially increased the 'defensive' force was now to switch to offensive mode and the Bush 'UN forces' attacked on Wednesday, January 16th 1991, as planned all along. 120,000 air sorties were unleashed on Iraq, mostly, it turned out, against civilian areas. Bush's Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Colin Powell, who has ancestral links with many old American and British families, headed the operation.


The number of dead and injured from the bombing of Iraq, the resulting disease and the economic sanctions can hardly be comprehended. Conditions for the civilians in Iraq have been unimaginable under the economic stranglehold that was imposed through the United Nations by America and Britain after the Gulf War.

Home of the brave ...

The 'wars' against Iraq" as with Afghanistan; cannot truly be described as wars at all My understanding of a war; is that you need two sides and under that definition the Gulf War was not a war, and soldiers have described it as a "turkey shoot", which is precisely what happened. The Iraqi army, mainly conscripts who had no choice, may have been armed by the US and Britain, but not with the level of firepower that they have.


Iraqi men, women and children were subjected to the most intense bombing blitz in human history. At least tens of thousands died in the bombardment and while the media were showing us pictures provided by the US military of 'smart bombs' that could target a building and go through a toilet window, the truth that was being suppressed daily by the military censors was very different.


At least 93% of the bombs that rained from the Iraqi skies were not 'smart' and that's according to the Pentagon's own numbers, and 70% of them missed their target. Other civilian targets were struck under the guise of being military or weapon-making centers. A civilian bomb shelter was hit because "intelligence told us it was a military headquarters".


Reporter Peter Arnett, then with CNN, visited the civilian bomb shelter in Iraq and found it was ... a bomb shelter.


He also visited a milk factory bombed because it was a "chemical weapons factory" and found it was... a milk factory. In fact he had been there a year before and it was producing ... milk.


Mistakes? Please.


Look again at how the Airman magazine described the capabilities of the Global Hawk unmanned surveillance plane deployed in Afghanistan and Iraq:

"On an early test, for example, Global Hawk flew at 56,000 feet over the Naval Weapons Center at China Lake, California. The images it gathered were so clear that an electro optical image stands out next to an F-18 fighter. An infrared image showed where concrete had cooled down from the shadow of a C-130 that had recently taken off." 16

There are no mistakes about locations when you. have that level of surveillance technology.


Thousands of Iraqi soldiers were buried alive in 1991 as 'UN' forces used bulldozers to fill in their trenches in blatant contravention of international law. But nothing encapsulates the mentality of these deeply sick people currently waging the war on terrorism' better than the almost unimaginable attacks on the "Highway of Death'''.


The Iraqi army was in retreat in the wake of the air bombardment and headed out of Kuwait across the border to Basra. With them were civilians and prisoners. US pilots attacked the vehicles at the front and back of the seven mile retreating human convoy, so forcing it to a standstill on the open road. They then systematically bombed the convoy, constantly racing back to their 'aircraft carrier to re-arm and return to continue the mass murder.


As one pilot said, it was .like "shooting fish in a barrel" and thousands died at the hands of the very people who now 'fight terrorism' and promote themselves as morally superior to. those they target. Barry McCaffrey, one of the generals involved in this mass murder, was later appointed by President Clinton to head his 'War on Drugs'.


Yet, as he conducted these crimes against humanity, father George Bush approval ratings soared, just as they did for his son when he continued the long, long, family association with human genocide. The blatant defiance of the Geneva Convention on the Highway of Death produced no action against the Bush adIJ1inistration because there is one law for America, Britain and other 'Western' and English speaking nations, and a very different one for those they choose to bomb, kill, mutilate.


An International War Crimes Tribunal found,

  • President George Bush,

  • Vice President Dan Quayle,

  • Defense Secretary Dick Cheney,

  • Secretary of State James Baker

  • military leaders Colin Powell and Norman Schwarzkopf,

...guilty of war crime.


But what was done as a result? Nothing.


These are the people who have the audacity to put others on trial for war crimes, like the former Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic.

Dark knights

The Illuminati Queen of England was most grateful to these maniacs, however, and she made Bush's military chiefs Colin Powell and "Stormin'" Norman Schwarzkopf, (the commander of Operation Desert Storm) Honorary Knights of the British Empire. Schwarzkopf has lied through his teeth about the 'mystery' disease known as Gulf War Syndrome that has afflicted veterans of that slaughter.


His father would have been proud of him. Norman Schwarzkopf senior had been an important player in the British-American Intelligence coup called Operation AJAX, which removed the Iranian Prime Minister Dr Mohammad Mossadegh in 1953. The Illuminati wanted him ousted after he nationalized oil production and removed the oil cartel's power over his people.


The British bloodline Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, was also behind the coup. Mossadegh was replaced by the dictatorship of the Shah of Iran who reversed the oil nationalization (see And The Truth Shall Set You Free). It is rare for the Queen to give Honorary Knighthoods and other honors to people outside the Commonwealth, but those she has chosen read like an Illuminati Who's Who.


The titles are dubbed "honorary" because the American Constitution forbids the acceptance of titles from the monarch of a foreign state without the permission of Congress.


So few of these honors are given because, as a British government official put it:

"One must not debase the currency."

I wonder if you think the following names debase the currency:

  • George Bush, the paedophile, child killer, mass murderer, Satanist and close friend of the Windsors, was made Honorary Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath, as was Ronald Reagan, Bush's lapdog 'President'

  • Henry Kissinger, the 'orchestrator of genocide on a monumental scale worldwide, was made Knight Commander of the Order of St Michael and St George at a ceremony at Windsor Castle Brent Scowcroft, an executive of Kissinger Associates and top adviser to George Bush, was made an Honorary Knight of the British Empire

  • Casper Weinberger, another Bush clone who was charged with offences in the Iran-Contra arms scandal and pardoned by Bush, is another Honorary Knight of the British Empire

After the September 11th atrocities, the insider mayor of New York, Rudolph Giuliani, was appointed an Honorary Knight Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire for doing nothing more than the job he was paid handsomely to do.


So why was he such a chosen one?


For some more, realistic background to 'hero' Giuliani and his activities see the website of Robert Lederman, a street artist in New York and a regular columnist for the Greenwich Village Gazette. 17

Burying the truth

The crimes for which the Bush family and their masters and associates are responsible rarely comet to light because the media, at the top level, is controlled by the Illuminati and most Journalists either don't realize they are pawns in a game or they accept it to protect their careers. The accounts are legion of how evidence and footage that expose the lies, especially in wartime, are banned or confiscated.


One example during the 1991 Gulf Slaughter was when the American TV networks NBC and CBS refused to air pictures shot in Iraq of the destruction of civilian areas that revealed the Bush government and military accounts to be a grotesque fiction -just as they are In the 'war on terrorism'. The story was blocked by the President of NBC Michael Gartner and the producers offered it to CBS, where Tom Bettag, the Executive Editor of the CBS Evening News, said one of them would appear on the show the following day to tell their story.


That evening Bettag was sacked and the story buried. This is the real background to the TV news.18


Footage of the Highway of Death was also suppressed. Father Bush's lies about Iraqi troop deployments in Kuwait, provable by satellite images, were also never shown. This satellite 'loophole in the lies' was the reason why the US government purchased all rights to satellite pictures of Afghanistan while that country was subjected to another insane American and British bombing onslaught.


We should note, of course, that having said that the CIA-installed dictator Saddam Hussein was a there it to the world, and with the Iraqi' army' destroyed, father George Bush suddenly called an end to the 'war' and pulled the troops out leaving Saddam still intact.


As Norman Schwarzkopf said with an air of disappointment:

"We could have completely closed the door and made it a battle of annihilation... [it was] literally about to become the battle of Cannae, a battle of annihilation."

Ah, never mind Norman, but you see your president and those who controlled him wanted Hussein to stay put, or at least appear to, so they could play that card again more than a decade later.

Bombing is not enough ...

The public believe the Gulf War ended in 1991, but in fact it was only beginning. Using the 'threat' of Saddam, the 'threat' Bush chose not to remove when it was there for the taking, the United States and the United Kingdom, the diabolical duo of world terrorism, led a campaign of 'sanctions' against Iraq. They also continued, unreported, the bombing of civilian targets, a policy maintained by the Clinton and boy George Bush administrations.


Investigative journalist John Pilger wrote of a woman he met in northern Iraq who had lost her husband, children and father-in-law when they were bombed by two US planes while tending their sheep on open land.19 The sanctions against a country that imports 70% of its food were imposed on a people already devastated by the mass bombing of their electricity, water supply, transport and sewer systems, which the British and American governments refused to allow them to rebuild.


A public health team from Harvard University went into Iraq soon after the official bombing and estimated that over 46,000 children under the age of five had already died by August 1991 because of the destruction of Iraq's infrastructure.20 But the nightmare was only beginning. Writer Thomas J Nagy exposed the coldly calculated way the US military targeted the Iraqi. water supply in the full knowledge of the gruesome effect this would have on the people, especially children.


In an article headed "The Secret Behind the Sanctions: How the US Intentionally Destroyed Iraq's Water Supply", he wrote that the United States knew the cost that civilian Iraqis, mostly children, would pay, and it went ahead anyway.21 Nagy, who lectures at the School of Business and Public Management at George Washington University uncovered documents from the US Defense Intelligence Agency that reveal a stunning disregard for human life.


A document dated January 22nd 1991 says:

"Iraq depends on importing specialized equipment and some chemicals to purify its water supply ... Failing to secure supplies will result in a shortage of pure drinking water for much of the population. This could lead to increased incidences, if not epidemics, of disease ... [the] most likely diseases during [the] next 90 days [include]: diarrheal diseases (particularly children); acute respiratory illnesses (colds and influenza); typhoid; hepatitis A (particularly children); measles, diphtheria and pertussis (particularly children); meningitis, including meningococcal, particularly children cholera (possible, but less likely)." 22

This is a massive violation of the Geneva Convention, which says:

"It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove, or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population, such as foodstuffs, crops, livestock, drinking water installations and supplies, and irrigation works, for the specific purpose of denying them for their sustenance value to the civilian population or to the adverse party, whatever the motive."

The US/British-led UN sanctions against I have done all of these things. By 1995 Secretary of State Madeleine Albright was forced to admit on the SixtyMinutes television program that these sanctions had already cost the lives of half a million Iraqi children and that was only up to then. Albright said on Sixty Minutes that she thought the consequences for those children were worth it to stop Saddam.


That is stunning enough, but, of course, by invading Iraq a second time in 2003 they were saying that the sanctions and all that death and suffering was for nothing. This is the mentality that controls our world. A report by Richard Garfield of Columbia University concluded that the increase in child death rates in Iraq was virtually unique in modem health studies.23


Denis Halliday, coordinator of the so-called 'Oil-for-Food Program' resigned in September 1998 and spoke out against the genocidal effects of the sanctions. His successor, Hans von Sponeck, did the same in February 2000. The US government response was to try to discredit the two men. The 'oil for food' farce provided the oil cartel with cheap Iraqi oil. Forty per cent of Iraq's oil, exchanged to buy food, ended up in the United States at knock-down prices because of the sanctions imposed by the United States and Britain to the immense benefit of the Illuminati oil cartel.


The forces of freedom and liberty have also been bombing Iraq with weapons containing spent uranium and this has led to the birth of babies with horrible deformities and disease (Figures 8 and 9). Since this bombardment began in 1991 Iraq has developed the world's highest rate of childhood leukemia.


At the same time there was an embargo on medicines and technology that would help to reduce the radiation.

The genocidal attacks on the Iraqi population began with 'Republican' father George Bush, continued with 'Democrat' Bill Clinton, and within a month of taking office at the start of 2001, George W. Bush, another ,'Republican', was ordering (being told to order) more "routine" bombing of Iraq.


In all they are just lackeys for the same one-party state and that's why the policies never change no matter who is in the White House.

Don't do as I do ...

The sanctions were 'justified' in part because 9f the 'weapons of mass destruction', . including biological weapons, claimed to be stockpiled by Saddam Hussein in 2003. But the Iraqi arsenal was funded and. supplied by the US and British governments and their allies, and the biggest owner of weapons of mass destruction on the planet is the US government. What's more, by far the greatest user of them is ... the US government. Only one nation has dropped nuclear weapons on another country at the time of writing ... the United States.


Add to that the voting record of the United States at the United Nations where it has consistently opposed resolutions to limit the production and testing of biological and nuclear weapons, as it has on a stream of humanitarian and freedom issues. While the US government was lying about the threat to the world from Saddam's chemical weapons, in one location alone in the United States, Anniston, Alabama, were 873,020 pounds of sarin, 1,657,480 pounds of VX nerve agent and 1,876,760 pounds of mustard-agent. 24 Across America the military is storing 23,415 tons of liquid sarin nerve agent blister-causing mustard agent, a deadly nerve liquid called VX and variants 46,830,000 pounds of chemicals.25


A teaspoon is enough to kill or maim. The United States is required by . international treaty to destroy all chemical weapons by 2007, but nearly 75 per cent of the nation's now-banned arms still exist. The moralizing of the United States government and the brain-dead people who support the continuing death and destruction is sickening beyond measure.


The US is:

  • the only country to have bombed more than 20 countries since 1945;

  • the only country to use nuclear weapons; it withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty in December 2001;

  • refused to support efforts to create a verification process for the Biological Weapons Convention and brought an international conference on the matter to a halt in July 2001;

  • refused to ratify the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child;

  • it is the only Western country to allow the death penalty for children;

  • it refused to sign the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty, forbidding the use of landmines;

  • joined Israel in opposing a 1987 General Assembly resolution condemning international terrorism.26

Amnesty International said in 1996:

"Throughout the world, on any given day, a man, woman or child is likely to be displaced, tortured, killed or 'disappeared', at the hands of governments or armed political groups. More often than not, the United States shares the blame." 27

British leaders, too, have an appalling record of mass murder. As far back as 1919, when Winston Churchill was Secretary of State at the War Office, they were using chemical weapons against Iraq. When poison gas was used to put down an Iraqi rebellion against colonial rule, Churchill said:

"I do not understand this squeamishness about the use of gas. I am story in favor of using [it] against uncivilized tribes." 28

A soldier who fought with the British army in the Gulf War of 1991 told me that chemical weapons were used against the Iraqi troops in that conflict.


Robert Cooper, a former diplomat and personal assistant for foreign affairs to British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, admitted in The Post-Modern State and the World Order:

"We need to get used to the idea of double standards ... [in other words] ... get over it, we are hypocrites (but powerful ones)."

Cooper said that the 1991 conflict with Iraq was to maintain control of oil supplies and "... the reasons for fighting the Gulf War were not that Iraq had violated the norms of international behavior ... "




They just use any excuse to sell a lie to the people to introduce their agenda -as they have with September 11th and the second 'war' with Iraq.

Weapons of mass deception

It was long planned, as these things are, that 'weapons of mass destruction' was to be the excuse for the second war against Iraq in 2003. Having supplied Saddam's chemical and biological arsenal they were not going to let him negotiate it away or acknowledge it was no longer there. Even so, Scott Ritter, former head of UN weapons inspectors in Iraq, made it clear that by the late 1990s Saddam's regime was no threat.


Ritter said in the June 2000 edition of Arms Control Today:

"Given the comprehensive nature of the monitoring regime put in place by UNSCOM, which included a strict export-import control regime, it was possible as early as 1997 to determine that, from a qualitative standpoint, Iraq had been disarmed. Iraq no longer possessed any meaningful quantities of chemical or biological agent, if it possessed any at all, and the industrial means to produce these agents had either been eliminated or were subject to stringent monitoring. The same was true of Iraq's nuclear and ballistic missile capabilities.’’

" ... By the end of 1998, Iraq had, in fact, been disarmed to a level unprecedented in modern history, but UNSCOM and the Security Council were unable -and in some instances unwilling -to acknowledge this accomplishment."

They were unwilling because it would have destroyed the cover story necessary to continue the mass killing and 'sell' the planned invasion of 2003. The consequences for the people of Iraq of the 1991 war and the sanctions that followed were beyond comprehension. The country was already in a desperate state even before the US and British blitzkrieg was visited upon them for the second time.


Arundhati Roy wrote in the UK Guardian:

"After using the 'good offices' of UN diplomacy (economic sanctions and weapons inspections) to ensure that Iraq was brought to its knees, its people starved, half a million of its children killed, its infrastructure severely damaged, after making sure that most of its weapons have been destroyed, in an act of cowardice that must surely be unrivalled in history, the 'Allies' Coalition of the Willing' (better known as the Coalition of the Bullied and Bought) - sent in an invading army!

"Operation Iraqi Freedom? I don't think so. It's more like Operation Let's Run a Race, but First Let Me Break Your Knees." 29



1 Radio Free America, March 28th 1991. See also Sherman Skolnick's website at

2 Ibid

3 London Times Online, December 31st, 2002

4 Ibid

5 Ibid

 6 "The Two Faces of Donald Rumsfeld", by Randeep Ramesh, The Guardian, May 9th 2003

7 Ibid

8 Ibid

9 Rodney Stich, Defrauding America, (Diablo Western Press, Alamo, California, 1994), p 426

10 Transcribed by Leading Edge Research Group,, posted at

11 Defrauding America, p 430
12 "Inside the Shadow CIA", Spy Magazine, September 1992

13 Ibid

14 George C. Andrews, Extraterrestrial Friends and Foes (1liumiNet Press, Lilburn, GA, USA, 1993), p 288

15 Transcript of the meeting released by the Iraqis and quoted by Russel S. Bowen in The Immaculate Deception (American West Publishers), Carson City, 1991), pp 146-147




19 William Thomas, All Fall Down (Essence Publications, 2002), p 50

20'' \1 "_edn49" \0

21 •• \I •.

23 See Richard Garfield's full report at

24 St Petersburg Times, March 16th 2003,,,,,
25 Ibid
26 See Michael Moore, Stupid White Men, Penguin Books, 2001
27 Noam Chomsky, Rogue States: The Rule of Force·J.n World Affairs (Pluto Press London 2000)
29 The Guardian, April 2nd 2003

Back to Contents