The Israel connection

Truth is generally the best vindication against slander.
Abraham Lincoln

Six months before the invasion of Iraq, journalist Brian Whitaker reported in the UK's Guardian newspaper that an Israeli 'Think-tank', the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, had produced a document in 1996 called A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm. The document was written for the incoming Israeli government of Benjamin Netanyahu, an aide to whom was that constantly recurring name, Richard Perle, who is now at the heart of the Bush administration's plans for the conquest of the Middle East and East-north Africa (except for Israel).


The document advised the rightwing Netanyahu to adopt a new strategy ''based on 'an entirely new intellectual foundation, one that restores strategic initiative and provides the nation the room to engage every possible energy on rebuilding Zionism".2 It called for Israel to abandon any policy of trading land for peace with the Arabs because this, it said, was "cultural, economic, political, diplomatic and military retreat".


The Clean Break was a virtual replica of the blueprint produced four years later for the incoming Bush administration by the Project for the New American Century. This is no surprise when you realize that the authors of the two documents were pretty much the same and they are now at the heart of the Bush government. I will look further at the Clean Break document and its authors shortly, but first there are some extremely important points to make about the re-writing of history with relation to Israel and other information the-neo-con manipulators wish to suppress.


For example, the Clean Break paper makes this assertion:

"Our claim to the land - to which we have Clung for hope for 2,000 years - is legitimate and noble. Only the unconditional acceptance by Arabs of our rights, especially in their territorial dimension, 'peace for peace'; is a solid basis for the future." 3

It turns out, however, to be anything but legitimate and noble. The Zionist" claim to the land of Israel is based on Old Testament texts, the true authorship of which is unknown.


Put simply:

"God gave the 'Promised Land' to us, his 'chosen people', and so the land is ours."

Er..., that's it. But it gets even more insane. As some brave Jewish writers like Arthur Koestler 4 have confirmed, the overwhelming majority of 'Jewish' people, and certainly those that control Israel and 'advise' Bush, have no historical connection at all to the land of Israel.


They are not genetically Jewish and they are certainly not 'Semites'!!


They don't originate from Biblical Israel, but from a people called the Khazars in what became southern Russia down to the Caucasus Mountains. This is why the so-called 'Jewish nose' is not a genetic trait of Israel, but the Caucasus! Alfred M. Lilienthal, a former American State Department official, called these facts "Israel's Achilles heel", because it destroys Zionist claims to the land of the Biblical Hebrews.5


Historians believe the Khazars to be descendents of the Turkik tribe known as the Huns or Hun that invaded and savaged Europe from Asia around 450 AD. The Huns' territories stretched at one time from Central Asia to Central Europe, from Siberia and China to North India. They were a grouping of tribes and bloodlines from the interbreeding with many peoples, including the Chinese and the Sumerians. The Huns are best remembered for their leader, Attila the Hun, who seized power by killing his brother, Buda, after whom the Hungarian city of Budapest was named.


Like the Huns, the Khazars spoke the Turkik language and are believed to be the same people. The Khazars controlled a large and powerful 'Pagan' empire across most of Russia to the Ural Mountains in the East and the Caucasus Mountains in the south and they made their living as traders and 'middlemen', levying taxes on the goods carried on the trade routes through their lands.


Their influence in Eastern Europe extended well into the countries we now know as Poland, Czechoslovakia, Austria, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria (Figure 7, below). The Khazars were phallic worshippers and engaged in human sacrifice rituals. In a series of wars, the first from 642 to 652 AD, and the second from 722 to 739 AD, some 300,000 Khazar warriors prevailed against invading Muslims.


They saved Russia and Eastern Europe for Christianity, which had also been defended on other fronts by the armies of Charles Martel ("the Hammer"), the leader of the Merovingian Franks. Martel was the grandfather of Charlemagne, to whom 34 of the 43 presidents of the United States are descended, together with the royal families of Europe


The "circumcised unicorn"

In about 740 AD, King Bulan, the King of Khazaria, adopted the religion of Judaism and the whole nation did the same. Legend says that King Bulan was told to do this in dreams or visions, but it was clearly a political move to avoid being absorbed by the Christian or Islamic world on either side. What is for certain is that the Khazars, the ancestors of at least 90 per cent of those calling themselves 'Jewish' today, had nothing whatsoever to do with the land called Israel.


Their home was not the Dead Sea, but the Caspian Sea, which became known as 'The Khazar Sea'. This is the area targeted by the Illuminati today for its immense oil and gas reserves. Arthur Kessler writes that a "warrior nation of Turkish Jews must have seemed to the rabbis as strange as a circumcised unicorn".6 There were, apparently, two streams of Khazar known as the Kara or "black" Khazars and the Ak or "white" Khazars, although Arthur Koestler says this may not have been related to the color of their skin.


But an Arab Chronicler, Said al-Maghribi, wrote:

“As to the Khazars, they are to the north of the inhabited Earth towards the 7th clime, having over their heads the constellation of the Plough. Their land is cold and wet. Accordingly their complexions are white, their eyes blue, their hair flowing and predominantly reddish, their bodies large and their natures cold. Their general aspect is wild.” 7

Figure 7:

The Empire of the Khazars with the Christian and Muslim worlds on either side.

The Khazars converted to Judaism in about 740 AD and these are the origins of people like the Rothschilds.

Henry Kissinger. the 'neo-con' leadership in the United States and those who have controlled Israel since it was formed in 1948.

They are not Semitic people and do not have any connection to the land of Israel.

Certainly the Caucasus region is so associated with the white race that in North America white people are still referred to as "Caucasian".


The Khazars fought, made alliances and interbred with peoples like the Viking Rus (who became the Russians) and the Magyars with whom they had extremely close relations. The Khazars were instrumental in the creation of the Magyar homeland of Hungary. Names like the Russian Cossack and the Hungarian Hussar came from 'Khazar', as did the German for heretic, Ketzer.8


The Khazars also had close connections with the Byzantine Christian/Roman Empire and there was interbreeding between them. A Khazar princess married Emperor Constantine V and their son became Emperor Leo known as Leo the Khazar, who ruled Byzantium from 775 to 800. The deposed Emperor Justinian II fled to Khazaria in 708, where the king (the "Khagan" or "Kagan") gave him shelter and allowed him to marry his sister.


She took the name Theodora and became Empress when Justinian was restored to the Byzantine throne.


The Khazar Sumerians

The Khazars and their close associates and subordinates, the Magyars, were related to the Sumerians, a people that will become increasingly important in this story as we progress. The Sumerians were said to be the first settlers of southern Mesopotamia about 5,000 BC and came from the mountainous regions to the North and East. There they built what historians call "the cradle of civilization" an Empire that stretched in all directions, including north of the Caucasus Mountains where the Khazars were to develop their own empire and have their mass 'conversion' to the Jewish faith.


It was believed that the Magyars were a nomadic people from the north with a language of Finnish-Ugrian origin. But Dr Sandor Nagy writes in The Forgotten Cradle of the Hungarian Culture,9 that the people who later became known as Magyars were Sumerians that were pushed out of the Fertile Crescent of what is now Iraq. Dr Nagy uses extensive examples to confirm the linguistic similarities between the Sumerian, Old Magyar and the current Magyar language.


He also refers to several works written during the first millennium including the Arpad Codices and the De Administrando Imperio, and completed 50 years of his own research. He says that that while there are only two hundred Magyar words related to the Finno-Ugric language, there are over two thousand words related to the Sumerian. British, French and German archaeologists and linguists concluded that the language of ancient. Sumerian inscriptions was not Indo-European nor Semitic, but a language which demonstrated significant similarities with the group of languages known at the time as the Turanian ethnolinguistic group that included Hungarian, Turkic Mongolian and Finnic (later referred to as the Ural-Altaic group ).10


Research has indicated that the Sumerian-Hungarian languages have over a thousand common word roots and are very similar grammatical structure. Kalman Gosztony, professor of Sumerian philology at the Sorbonne, demonstrated in Sumerian Etymological Dictionary and Comparative Grammar that the structure of the Hungarian language is the closest to that of the Sumerian.


Of the 53 characteristics of Sumerian grammar, 51 matched in the Hungarian, compared with 29 in the Turkic languages, 24 in the Caucasian, 21 in the Uralic languages in the Semitic languages and 4 in the Indo-European. The linguistic similarities between Sumerian, Hungarian and other languages are confirmed by the archaeological and anthropological evidence, Dr Sandor Nagy says there were two separate migrations of the Sumerian people out of the Mesopotamia one through Turkey to the Carpathian Basin and the other went east and then north across the Caucasus Mountains into the area between the Caspian and Black Seas. This was the land occupied by the Khazar Empire to such an extent that the Caspian became known as the Khazar Sea.


The Khazars were descended from the Huns and the Huns are said to be descended, like the Magyars, from the Sumerians. An ancient pre-Christian traditional account of Hungarian origins says they are the descendents of Nimrod (the legendary founder of Babylon), the son of Cush. The legend claims that Nimrod and Eneth had two sons, Magor and Hunor.


It is said that Magor was the ancestor of the Magyars and Hunor was the ancestor of the Huns, so providing the common origin of the Magyars and the Huns (Khazars). Ancient Byzantine sources say the Magyars were also called the Sabirs and originated from Mesopotamia, the land of Sumer. Numerous other ancient and medieval sources refer to the Scythians, Huns (Khazars), Avars and Magyars as the same peoples, even though the Hungarian authorities appear desperate to deny this. In previous books I have highlighted the movement of the former Sumerians through the Caucasus Mountains under different names, like the Scythians.


Now we have further confirmation of the importance of the Caucasus region where, as again I have emphasized before, some highly significant breeding occurred between bloodlines from Sumer and those from the Far East and China. This Caucasian Chinese-Turkish combination produced very important bloodlines from the Illuminati's point of view.


A writer on a Jewish website, using the name Im nin'alu, says:

"The Huns' origin is directly connected with two well-known peoples of the ancient Middle East: the Sumerians and the Scythians, namely, in the kingdom founded by Nimrod. Even though they belong to the Japhetic stock and their most creditable ancestor is Magog, the Sumerian heritage has been kept by them more than by any other people, which implies that they are in fact the result of a mixed background. According to their own legendry accounts (legends that are anyway founded on true facts), it is very feasible that they kept close ties with Sumerians even for a long time' after the Sumerians disappeared from Mesopotamia as a national entity. Their particular link with ancient Sumerians was found through the comparison of modern Hungarian (Magyar) and other related languages with documents of the ancient Middle East that revealed a possible common origin.

"The ancient Sumerians, that in the dawn of history settled in Southern Mesopotamia, in the land commonly known as Shin'ar or Chaldea, arrived there from the north, precisely from the Ararat region [now Turkey], that they called 'Subar-Ki' or 'Subar-Tu'. This area was also named after one of the peoples that inhabited there, the Hurri, whose language was agglutinative like Sumerian and had many words in common, even being a totally different tongue. Modern Hungarian shares many terms with both Sumerian and Hurrian, as well as with Elamite." 11

The real exodus

The Khazar Empire, the first feudal state in Eastern Europe, broke up in a series of wars and invasions culminating in the arrival of the Mongol 'Golden Horde', best remembered for their inspiration, Genghis Khan. Over the centuries of power and influence, the Khazar peoples began to emigrate in many directions.


S.W. Baron said of Khazaria in A Social and Religious History of the Jews:

"Its population was largely absorbed by the Golden Horde which had established the centre of its empire in Khazar territory. But before and after the Mongol 'upheaval the Khazars sent many offshoots into the unsubdued Slavonic lands, helping ultimately to build up the great Jewish centers of Eastern Europe." 12

Khazars took their Judaistic or Talmudic faith and settled in many East European and Alpine lands, especially Poland-Lithuania. There are many ancient place names in Poland and the Ukraine inspired by the name "Khazar" or "Zhid", a term meaning Jew.13


These include Kozarzewek, Kozara, Kozarzow and Zydowo. As the Khazar Empire collapsed in the period after 960, a number of Slavonic tribes, led by, the Polans, formed an alliance that became the state called Poland. 'Jews' (Khazars) played an important role in the Polish legends about the formation of the country. One says that a 'Jew' called Abraham Prokownik was elected by the tribes to rule them.14 Certainly Khazar 'Jews' became pro1llinent in many countries of Eastern Europe.


Arthur Koestler writes:

"Both the Hungarian and Polish sources refer to Jews employed as mintmasters, administrators of the royal revenue, controllers of the salt monopoly, tax-collectors and 'money-lenders' - i.e., bankers. This parallel suggests a common origin of those two immigrant communities; and as we can trace the origins of the bulk of Hungarian Jewry to the Magyar-Khazar nexus, the conclusion seems self-evident." 15

Koestler points out that the traditional garb of Polish Jewry is of unmistakably Eastern origin:

"The skullcap (yarmolka) is worn to this day by orthodox Jews and by the Uzbeks and other Turkish people in the Soviet Union".

What happened in this period is that the people formerly known for centuries as the Khazars became known simply as 'Jews' and their true origin was lost. In its place their leaders sold to them - and the rest of the world - a false history. This was the belief that they were the Biblical Jews and the fallacy continues to this day with devastating' consequences for peace in the Middle East.


The Khazar 'Jews' were confined to ghettos as a "result of Papal dictate in the mid-16th century and this, together with the17th century Cossack (ironically) massacres in the Ukraine, led to another mass exodus into Hungary, Bohemia, Rumania and Germany. There were hardly any Jews in Germany until this time.16

"Thus the great trek to the West was resumed", says Koestler, "It as to continue through nearly three centuries until the Second World War, and became the principle source of the existing Jewish communities in Europe, the United States and Israel." 17

So what does all this mean for the official history of the Jewish people? Koestler, who was himself born in Budapest, writes:

" ... [It] would mean that their ancestors came not from the Jordan, but from the Volga, not from Canaan but from the Caucasus, once believed to be the cradle of the Aryan race; and that genetically they are more closely connected to the Hun, Uigur and Magyar tribes than to the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.


Should this turn out to be the case, then the term 'anti-Semitism' would be void of meaning; based on a misapprehension shared by both the killers and their victims. The story of the Khazar Empire, as it slowly emerges from the past, begins to look like the most cruel hoax which history has ever perpetrated." 18

Benjamin H. Freedman was a one-time Jewish-businessman in New York and a long time 'insider' before speaking out vociferously against Zionism after World War Two. He was personally acquainted with leader American political figures like Bernard Baruch, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy and John F. Kennedy.


Freedman went much further in his assessment of the Khazar revelation:

"What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they are known as Jews, I don't call them Jews myself. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know what they are.)... There wasn't one of them [the Khazars] who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land. Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of them!


And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support their armed insurrections in Palestine by saying, 'You want to help repatriate God's Chosen People to their Promised Land, their ancestral home, don't you? It's your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as your Lord and Savior ... It is as ridiculous to call them 'people of the Holy Land,' as it would be to call the 54 million Chinese Moslems 'Arabs' .... " 19

The former Khazar people are known as the Ashkenazi Jews (plural Ashkenazim) and some writers estimate that perhaps 90% to 95% of those calling themselves 'Jewish' worldwide are ancestors of the Khazars. Others are known as Sephardic Jews and they do have historical connection to the Middle East, although even then the idea of a 'chosen race' going back to Biblical Israel still doesn't stand up, as we shall see.


The Ashkenazim ('Khazars') are actually the minority in Israel itself, but they hold the reins of power and have always done so since the country was created in 1948. The name Ashkenazi is said by some to originate from Ashkenaz, the Hebrew word for Germany. In fact, the Bible refers to the Ashkenaz as a people living in the region of Mount Ararat (now Turkey) and Armenia.


That would certainly fit the basic location of the Khazars.20


There is also a Biblical reference to Ashkenaz, brother of Togarma and nephew of Magog.21 Joseph, the Khaiar King in the second half of the tenth century, wrote in correspondence that they were ancestors of Togarma, who, he said, had ten sons that seeded all the Turkish tribes, including the Huns, Khazars and Bulgars. In the centuries after the demise of Khazaria, the Ashkenazi as a people did not speak the Semitic language of Hebrew, which is no surprise at all because they are not Hebrews.


They developed their own tongue called Yiddish. This began as a Germanic language from south eastern dialects of Middle High German and expanded into central and Eastern Europe starting in the 12th century. Later it evolved to include elements of Hebrew, Aramaic, Slavic languages and other influences.


Once again, Yiddish, the language of the Ashkenazi, did not come from Israel, but Eastern Europe.22


Heading "home"

It was the Ashkenazi (Khazar) 'Jews' who were persecuted by the Rothschild controlled Nazis in Germany in the 20th century, a persecution that led to the support for a 'Jewish' homeland in Israel. It was on the spurious historical claim that these people originated from Israel and that 'God' had promised them the land, that the House of Rothschild (Ashkenazim/Khazars) orchestrated the takeover of Palestine that has set the Middle East ablaze with violence ever since (see And The Truth Shall Set You Free for much more on the Rothschilds' involvement).


The Balfour Declaration in 1917, in which the British Foreign Secretary gave his government's support for a 'Jewish' homeland in Palestine, took the form of a letter from Lord Balfour to Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild. The letter was in fact drafted by Lord Rothschild and his employee, the banker, Alfred Milner.


It said:

"His Majesty's Government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country." 23

What a sick joke the bit about the civil and religious rights of the non-Jewish communities turned out to be. One of the most important secret societies within the Illuminati web is called the Round Table.


It is based in Britain with branches across the world, and it is the Round Table that orchestrates the network of the Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and the Royal Institute of International Affairs detailed in my other books. How fascinating then, that Lord Balfour was an inner circle member of the Round Table; Alfred Milner was the Round Table's official leader after the death of its founder, Cecil Rhodes; and the Round Table was funded by ... Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild.


These were the very three people involved in the Balfour Declaration. Two years later, in 1919, came the Versailles Peace Conference near Paris when the elite of the Round Table from Britain and the United States, people like Alfred Milner, Edward Mandel House and Bernard Baruch, were appointed to represent their countries at the meetings that decided how the world would be changed as a result of the war these same people had engineered.


They decided to impose impossible reparations payments on Germany, so ensuring the collapse of the post-war Weimar Republic amid unbelievable economic collapse and thus create the very circumstances that brought Hitler and the Nazis to power. It was at the Versailles conference that these Illuminati front men agreed to support the creation of a Jewish homeland in Palestine and every one of them was either a Rothschild bloodline or controlled by them.


Today it is still the same.


The Rothschilds are extremely close to people in 'power' like the Bushes, Hillary Clinton, British royal family, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Britain's Chancellor of the Exchequer, and Peter Mandelson, the long-time Blair 'guru'.


Evelyn de Rothschild and his wife, the American-born businesswoman, Lynn Forester, spent their wedding night at the White House at the invitation of Bill and Hilary Clinton and Lady de Rothschild has publicly stated her support for Blair and his Labour Party. This includes fundraising. She says she is a supporter of 'Third Way' politics, the "balance" (it claims) between Left and Right.24


The Third Way is actually an example of the Illuminati technique called the Hegelian Dialect when you playoff one extreme against another and fuse them together.


Zionism is a political movement, not a people

Zionism was the creation of the Ashkenazi/Khazar leadership, especially the House of Rothschild.


What most people don't realize is that Jewish people and the political movement called Zionism are not the same thing. It is like saying the Republican Party in the United States is the American nation or Blair's Labour Party is the British nation.


Large numbers of Jewish people are deeply opposed to the goals and claims of Zionism, but their views don't get reported. An example is the Neturei Karta movement, a grouping of Jewish people campaigning to expose the truth about Zionism. Their spokesman, Rabbi Ahron Cohen, issued a statement to members of the UK parliament saying that they expressed" a religious and I humanitarian philosophy held in essence by large numbers (hundreds of thousands) and possibly the majority of "authentic Orthodox Jews".


It was a philosophy "totally opposed to the attitude adopted by the Zionists and to Zionism as a whole".25 Rabbi Cehen said the Zionist movement founded about 100 years ago based on secular nationalistic aims, was a "complete abandonment of our religious teachings and faith ... "


The ideology of Zionism was to take the law into one's own hands and to try to force the outcome in the form of State irrespective of the cost in life and property to anyone who stands in the way.

"The Palestinians stood in the way", he said. Rabbi Cohen condemned the practical outcome of Zionism "in the form of the State known as Israel" as "completely alien to Judaism and the Jewish' Faith".

It had been, and continued to be, the cause of untold suffering and bloodshed, both Jewish and non-Jewish:

"The apparent connection between Judaism and Zionism is false. The connection has been nurtured by the Zionists in order to ensnare as many Jews as possible within their net." 26

Many will be surprised at those words because we only hear in the media from Zionist fronts like the Anti-Defamation League, which, in true Orwellian fashion, spends its time defaming people, including me.


Is the Illuminati agenda a Jewish plot, as some claim? No, no, no, no, no, no, no.


But, is the political movement called Zionism involved? Absolutely it is.


See the articles by Henry Makow, whose family suffered under the Nazis, for more background to this;27 and the works of Jewish writers such as Israel Shamir 28 and Norman Finkelstein.29 The Zionists are furious when such people speak out because they cannot credibly accuse them of being anti-Jewish or 'anti-Semitic' - the usual defense against exposure.


Finkelstein, the New York-born son of concentration camp survivors, says that Jewish organizations are "huckstering" the Holocaust by extracting huge sums in compensation through the Zionist-controlled 'Claims Conference' and other agencies that the survivors never see. He says his father received compensation from the German government totaling $250,000, yet his mother's compensation, channeled through American Jewish organizations, came to a total of just $3,500 and no pension.30

"What they have done, by turning the central tragedy of Jews in the 20th century into a weapon for shaking down people for money is pretty disgusting; it's wretched", he said.31

Finkelstein writes:

"The reported annual salary of Saul Kagan ['Kagan' was the name for the Khazar king] long-time Executive Secretary of the Claims Conference is $105,000. Between stints at the Conference, Kagan was convicted of 33 counts of willfully misapplying funds and credit while heading a New York bank. (The conviction was overturned only after multiple appeals.)


Alfonse D'Amato, the ex-Senator from New York, mediates Holocaust lawsuits against German and Austrian banks for $350 an hour plus expenses. For the first 6 months of his labours, he took $103,000 ...


Lawrence Eagleburger, Secretary of State under President [father] Bush [and executive of the notorious Kissinger Associates], earns an annual salary of $300';000 as chair of the International Commission On Holocaust-Era Insurance Claims ... Kagan rings up in 12 days, Eagleburger in 4 days, and D' Amato in 10 hours what my mother received in suffering six years of Nazi persecution." 32

Finkelstein estimates that more than $20 billion has been collected in compensation claims arising from the Holocaust, including the $1.25 billion he says was extorted from Swiss banks before the evidence to support the claim of stealing funds from Jewish victims of the Nazis was produced.


When an official inquiry later reported, it did not support the allegations on which the money had been demanded - and paid under the threat of an economic boycott - in a campaign led by Edgar Bronfman, the President of the World Jewish Congress (WJC). Bronfman said the money had to be paid before the inquiry reported because the victims were old and needed the money before they died. Once the money was in the coffer however, handing it out to the victims was suddenly not nearly so urgent.


Bronfman told the US House Banking Committee that the Swiss should "not be allowed to make a profit from the ashes of the Holocaust". But he later acknowledged that the,

"WJC treasury has amassed no less than 'roughly $7 billion' in compensation monies".33

Readers of my other books will have come across the multi-billionaire Bronfman family in Canada who built their media and liquor empire on the back of illegal booze running and organized crime. The Bronfmans are connected to the unbelievably corrupt Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a major Illuminati operation.


A taxpayer sued the Canadian government's tax-collecting scam, Revenue Canada, for allowing the Bronfmans to transfer huge sums of money to a cross-border trust fund without paying an estimated $300 to $600 million in taxes. I'm sure the Bronfman 'influence' on the Canadian government machine had nothing to do with this. I thoroughly recommend Finkelstein's book, The Holocaust Industry, if you wish to see the levels to which self-styled, self-appointed 'Jewish leaders' can sink in their unspeakable abuse and manipulation of genuine survivors of Nazi Germany.


The Israeli writer, Boas Evron, concluded:

"Holocaust awareness is an official, propagandistic indoctrination, a churning out of slogans and a false view of the world, the real aim of which is not at all an understanding of the past, but a manipulation of the present." 34

Finkelstein emphasizes the difference between what he calls the "Nazi Holocaust" and the extortion racket he terms, "The Holocaust", which fills the coffers of Jewish organizations and projects and not the pockets of those who genuinely suffered. Finkelstein accuses Jewish organizations of behaving "like a caricature from Der Sturmer" - the infamous racist magazine of the Nazis. He refers to them as "crooks" and has described Elie Wiesel, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986, as the "resident clown of the Holocaust circus".


He goes on:

"Before June 1967 [the Arab-Israeli war] the universalist message of concentration camp survivor Bruno Bettelheim resonated among American Jews. After the June war, Bettelheim was shunted aside in favor of Wiesel. Wiesel's prominence is a function of his ideological utility. Uniqueness of Jewish suffering/uniqueness of the Jews, ever-guilty Gentiles/ever-innocent Jews, unconditional defense of Israel/unconditional defense of Jewish interests: Elie Wiesel is The Holocaust." 35

When the Holocaust museum was planned for Washington DC, Wiesel led the campaign to commemorate onn1y Jewish victims and not the others targeted by the Nazis, including thehandlcapped.36 Wiesel rebuked Israel's Shimon Peres for speaking of two holocausts of the 20th century, Auschwitz and Hiroshima.37 Finkelstein highlights some of Wiesel's strange remarks.


Wiesel said in his memoirs that he read a book called The Critique of Pure Reason in Yiddish, while saying that he was "wholly ignorant of Yiddish grammar".38


Even worse, the book was never translated into Yiddish. Wiesel also told a New York Times reporter that he was hit by a car in Times Square at 45th Street and "flew an entire block" to land in 44th.39 He's definitely a man you can believe. It was Wiesel who wrote in the New York Times Book Review that a tome called


The Painted Bird by "Holocaust survivor", Jerzy Kosinski, was "one of the best incitements of the Nazi era" and "written with deep sincerity and sensitivity".40 Well not exactly because Kosinski turned out to be a fraud who made it all up. Another book on the same subject called Fragments won the Jewish National Book Award before its "Holocaust surviving" author, Binjamin Wilkomirski, was exposed as,

(a) not being Jewish

(b) spending the entire war in Switzerland

But, as Finkelstein writes, questioning is not allowed.


It's racist:

"To question a survivor's testimony, to denounce the role of Jewish collaborators, to suggest that Germans suffered during the bombing of Dresden or that any state except Germany committed crimes in World War II - this is all [claimed to be] evidence...of Holocaust denial. And to suggest that Wiesel has profited from the Holocaust Industry, or even to question him, amounts to Holocaust denial." 41

Norman Finkelstein has faced the wrath of his targets and says the New York Times gave a more hostile review to his book, The Holocaust Industry, than it did to Hitler's Mein Kampf.

"I don't want to play the martyr, but if you look at my history I didn't make out so well", he said, "I'm in exile in [DePaul University] Chicago because I was thrown out of every [University] school in New York." 42

Jewish people as a whole are being conned as much; if hot more, than anyone.


Jack Bernstein, who is, like Arthur Koestler, an Ashkenazi, confirms the background I have highlighted:

"The powerful Zionist propaganda machine has led the American people to believe that a Jew is a Jew one race of people and that they are 'God's Chosen People' ... First, it is important for you to understand that Jews are not one race of people. There are two distinct groups of Jews in the world and they come from two different areas of the world the Sephardic Jews from the Middle East and North Africa, and the Ashkenazi Jews come - from Eastern [and later Western] Europe. The Sephardic is the oldest group and it is they, if any, who are the Jews described in the Bible. They are blood relatives to the Arabs - the only difference between them is religion.

"The Ashkenazi Jews, who now comprise 90% of the Jews in the world, had a rather strange beginning. According to historians, many of them Jewish, the Ashkenazi Jews came into existence about 1200 years ago ... [as the Khazars] ... Some time during the 13th century, the Khazars were driven from their and they migrated westward with most of them settling in Poland and Russia. The Khazars are now known Ashkenazi Jews. Because these' Khazar (Ashkenazi) Jews merely chose Judaism, they are not really Jews - at least not blood Jews." 43

It is the Ashkenazi leadership - who are not Jewish by blood and are not historically-connected to the lands of Israel - that took over Palestine on an historical fabrication and have controlled the country ever since!! Sam Hamod, a former advisor to the US State Department and former editor of Third World News in Washington, took up this theme in an Internet article.44


He wrote that "actual genetic Jews" were born in the Middle East and were known as Sephardic Jews.


These Jews did speak a Semitic language, Hebrew, from their earliest incarnation, but later also spoke Aramaic, Arabic and Amharic because of their location in Jerusalem and other Middle Eastern cities like what is now Addis Ababa, Cairo, Baghdad and Damascus.

"One rarely hears a Sephardic Jew yelling, 'anti-Semite"', he said, "because they know better and because he is aware of his own history within Semitic language speaking lands."

Hamod continued:

" ... most of those Ashkenazim Jews who were born and raised in America, such as Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and Feith, are not even Jews genetically, because they are descended from Slavic tribes known as the Khazars who converted to Judaism and whose native language was Slavic and whose first language in America has been English ... I am not saying all Ashkenazim are not Jews, but the way some of them I behave is certainly not in the way Moses brought Judaism from God through the Torah.


One has but to look at the haters and war-mongers in the Bush circle of influence and this is evident; no God would want them to be associated with his name. Thus, as a ' friend of mine, Rabbi Samuel Handelman put it, 'They may call themselves Jews but I doubt very much if I'd call them that, and if I did, I'd say they were the worst of what any person might be. I'd rather not be associated with them." 44

Rabbi Handelman is not alone. In an impassioned article headed "Because We Are Jews", Rabbi Mordechi Weberman pledged his support for the just treatment of the Palestinian people. I have included the full text in Appendix III because it is important to know that all people calling themselves Jewish do not think the same.


But this is what the Ashkenazi/Khazar leadership, like the Rothschilds, want the world to think. If they can sell the belief in 'one Jewish voice' it means they can promote their own 'voice' and their own agenda under the banner of the 'Jewish people'. Rabbi Weberman said there were those who asked why they marched with the Palestinians.


Why did they raise the Palestinian flag? Why did they support the Palestinian, cause?

"You are Jews!" they said. "What are you doing?"

His response was simple:

"It is precisely because we are Jews that we march with the Palestinians and raise their flag! It is precisely because we are Jews that we demand that the Palestinian peoples be returned to their homes and Properties! Yes, in our Torah we are commanded to be fair. We are called upon to pursue justice. And what could be more unjust than the century-old attempt of the Zionist movement to invade another people's land, to drive them out and steal their property?

"We have no doubt that would Jewish refugees have come to Palestine not with the intention of dominating, not with the intention of making a Jewish state, not with the intention of dispossessing, not with the intention of depriving the Palestinians of their basic rights, that they would have been welcomed by the Palestinians, with the same hospitality ,that Islamic peoples have shown Jews throughout history. And we would have 'lived together as Jews and Muslims lived before in Palestine in peace and harmony." 46

In a message to "our Islamic and Palestinian friends", Rabbi Weberman said there are Jews around the world that supported their cause.

"There should be an apology to the Palestinian people which is clear and precise", he wrote. "Zionism did you wrong. Zionism stole your homes. Zionism stole your land."

He said they proclaimed before the world that they' are the people of the Torah and that their faith demanded that they be honest and fair, good and kind:

"We have attended hundreds of pro-Palestinian rallies over the years and everywhere we go the leaders and audience greet us with the warmth of Middle Eastern hospitality. What a lie it is to say that Palestinians in particular or Muslims in general hate Jews. You hate injustice. Not Jews. " 47

Rabbi Ahron Cohen in his statement for the Neturei Karta group said the Zionists have made themselves appear to be representatives and spokespeople of all Jews and thus their actions aroused animosity against the Jew's.

"But, this is simply not true! Zionism is not Judaism. Zionists cannot speak in the name of Jews."

According to the Torah and the Jewish faith, he said, the present Palestinian Arab claim to rule in Palestine was right and just - the Zionist claim was wrong and criminal:

"One must add to this wrong, the fact that in order to achieve an ill conceived nationalistic ambition, a shocking contravention of natural and humanitarian justice was committed by the Zionists in setting up an illegitimate regime in Palestine completely against the wishes of the established population, the Palestinians, which inevitably had to be based on loss of life, killing and stealing." 49

He said this was a tragedy for the Palestinians and also for the Jewish people.


When did you last hear these authentic voices of the Jewish faith express these values in the mainstream media? Of course not, because this view is suppressed by the supporters of the Illuminati political movement called Zionism that must advance the lie that they speak for all Jewish people. When non-Jews challenge their actions they are dubbed an "anti-Semite" and when Jewish people do the same they are dubbed "self-haters" by these students of Machiavelli and Goebbels.


For a Jewish person to speak out for universal Justice is to be “a self hater''? What?


These guys are sick.

Now that Israel exists, the Israelis and Palestinians will have to live together in mutual respect if the violence is to end. However, peace is not wanted by the zealots behind the takeover of the Middle East and their murderous and manipulating intelligence arm, Mossad. Only the destruction 'Of the Arab world' is 63 enough for them.


To make these points is not "anti-Semitism" - the label used to stop legitimate debate and research. It is simply provable fact as the documents highlighted in this book reveal. The irony of this abusive term, "anti-Semitic", is that the overwhelming majority of 'Jewish' people are not Semitic because they come from southern Russia, not the Middle East. And, anyway, 'Semitic' refers to language-speaking, not genetics.


The major Semite peoples of the Middle East are actually the Arabs!


Greg Felton, a Canadian writer and specialist on Middle East affairs, said:

" ... What we know as the 'Jewish State' of Israel is really an ethnocentric garrison state established by a non-Semitic people for the declared purpose of dispossessing and terrorizing a civilian Semitic people. "In fact from Nov. 27, 1947, to May 15, 1948, more that 300,000 Arabs were forced from their homes and villages. By the end of the year, the number was close to 800,000 by Israeli estimates. Today, Palestinian refugees number in the millions." 50

Supporting the nazis

Another irony is that those calling themselves Jewish have suffered terribly over the years from the manipulations and agenda of those who rule them. Look at Nazi Germany where the mass of the Ashkenazi people were treated grotesquely while their leaders collaborated with their fascist persecutors, who were funded by Ashkenazi bankers and the British and American elite, including the Bush family.


President Bush’s grandfather, Prescott Bush, was involved with the Harriman Empire in the funding of the Nazis through a company called the Union Banking Corporation (UBC) and virtually all the Nazi trade with the United States was under the control of the Harriman interests and the stewardship of Prescott Bush.


The Union Bank interfaced with the steel and banking empire of Hitler funder, Fritz Thyssen, whose factories built the Nazi war machinery. The UBC was closed down for trading with the enemy and one might ask why professional 'Nazi hunters' like Simon Wiesenthal have never pursued the Bush family?? The Bush-Nazi connection has been highlighted by John Loftus, the president of the Florida Holocaust Museum, who pointed out that Prescott Bush derived a portion of his personal fortune from his affiliation with the UBC.


Loftus, a former prosecutor in the Justice Department's Nazi War Crimes Unit, said that leading Nazi industrialists secretly owned the 'Harriman/Bush' bank and they were moving money into the UBC through a second bank of Holland even after the United States declared war on Germany. The bank was liquidated in 1951, Loftus said, and President Bush's grandfather and great-grandfather received $1.5 million as part of that dissolution.


He said he had a file of paperwork linking the bank and Prescott Bush to Nazi money.

"That's where the Bush family fortune came from: It came from the Third Reich", Loftus said in a speech during the Sarasota Reading Festival.

The German publishing giant, Bertelsmann, is owned by the Thielens, who are reported to be related to Fritz Thyssen. Bertelsmann published Hitler's book, Mein Kampf, and was the biggest printer for the German army through its close ties to the Nazi Propaganda Ministry of Joseph Goebbels., In, 2002, the company was exposed for its Nazi connections and for using Jewish slave labour.52


(See And The Truth Shall Set You Free and The Biggest Secret for the Illuminati background to the Nazi concentration camps and the Bush family and House of Windsor connections to the Third Reich).


A Bertelsmann subsidiary in California has refused to print my books on the command of the German headquarters. Good. The majority of Jewish Americans apparently voted against Bush in 2000 and the number would have been even higher had they known the family connections to the Nazis and who and what was behind his rise to the presidency.


Canadian writer Greg Felton said this of the Zionist support for the Nazis:

"Israel would not be possible today if the World Zionist Congress and other Zionist agencies hadn't formed common cause with Hitler's exterminators to rid Europe of Jews. In exchange for helping round up non-Zionist Jews, sabotage Jewish resistance movements and betray the trust of Jews, Zionists secured for themselves safe passage to Palestine. This arrangement was formalized in a number of emigration agreements signed in 1938.


The most notorious case of Zionist collusion concerned Dr Rudolf Kastner, Chairman of the Zionist Organization in [Khazar] Hungary from 1943-45. To secure the safe passage of 600 Zionists to Palestine, he helped the Nazis send 800,000 Hungarian Jews to their deaths. The Israeli Supreme Court virtually whitewashed Kastner's crimes because to admit them would have denied Israel the moral right to exist .” 53

Or as David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister of Israel, said in a letter to the Zionist executive on December 17th 1938:

"The saving of Jewish lives from Hitler is considered here as a potential threat to Zionism, unless they are brought to Palestine. When Zionism had to choose between the Jewish people and the Jewish state, it unhesitatingly preferred the latter." 54

Alfred Rosenberg, the "intellectual leader" of the Nazi Party, is reported to have had 'Jewish' [that is Ashkenazi] ancestry.55


It was Rosenberg who gave the Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion to Hitler. These were purported to reveal plans for world domination alleged to have been presented at the Jewish World Congress held in Basel in 1897 and were used to 'justify' the horrific persecution of Jews in Germany although not the Ashkenazi leaders involved with the Nazi Party.


Rosenberg, who was born in Estonia, became editor of the Voelkischer Beebachter, the official Nazi Party newspaper, and he wrote The Myth of the Twentieth Century, which claimed that the Aryan race was the creator of all values and culture while the Jews were agents of cultural corruption. Under Rosenberg's command Jewish libraries throughout Europe were ransacked and the spoils delivered to him in Frankfurt. He also headed a special unit, Einsatzstab Rosenberg, which plundered art and furniture belonging to Jews in occupied Western Europe.56


Ernst Hanfstaengl, a close friend of US president Franklin Roosevelt, was also a close associate of Hitler before the war. He says he was warned by the Austrian writer, Rudolf Kommer,

that "if any political party emerges with an anti-Semitic program directed by Jewish or half Jewish fanatics we shall have to watch out".

Hanfstaengl wrote that later, after experiencing the influence that Alfred Rosenberg had over Hitler, he began to realize what that remark really meant:

"I thought back to Rudolf Kommer's remark about an anti-Semitic program directed by Jewish or half Jewish fanatics - Rosenberg was distinctly Jewish in appearance, although he would have been the first to protest furiously if anyone had questioned his ancestry. Yet I used to see him most mornings sitting in a dingy cafe at the corner of Briennerstrasse and Augustenstrasse with a Hungarian Jew named Holoschi, who was one of his principle assistants.


The man called himself Hollander in Germany and was another of these Jewish anti-Semites ... I suspected the [alleged] Aryan background of many of the others. Strasser and Streicher looked Jewish to me as well as figures like Ley, Frank and even Goebbels, who would have had difficulty in proving their pedigree," 57

Rosenberg and Goebbels worked closely together at the Propaganda Ministry. Never mind Rosenberg's own ancestry, what was he doing with a "principle assistant" that was Jewish when Rosenberg was one of the major architects of the master race madness and the persecution of Jews? This is only one of endless 'anomalies'.


The German Ashkenazi banker, Max Warburg, was a director of I.G. Farben the chemical and pharmaceutical giant, that was at the concentration camp at Auschwitz and was at the heart of Hitler's war machine (See And The Truth Shall Set You Free). His brother, Paul Warburg, who was behind the creation of the Illuminati's Federal Reserve banking system that controls the American economy, was a director of the US arm of 1.G. Farben.


Moshe Gotlieb reveals in his book, American Anti-Nazi Resistance '33 - '41, that Max Warburg's son, Erich, cabled his cousin, Frederick Warburg, a director of the Union Pacific Railroad, telling him to use all his influence to stop all anti-Nazi propaganda and activity in America, including atrocity news and unfriendly propaganda in foreign press, mass meetings, etc".


Frederick cabled back to Erich:

"No responsible groups here [are] urging [a] boycott [of] German goods, merely excited individuals."

Two days later, on March 31st, 1933, the Warburg-controlled American Jewish Committee and the B'nai B'rith, heavily influenced by the Sultzbergers of the New York Times, issued an official joint statement saying,

"no American boycott against Germany be encouraged," and advised "no further mass meetings be held or similar forms of agitation be employed".

Journalist John L. Spivak exposed the Warburg connections to the Nazis in an article in 1934 headed "Wall Street's Fascist Conspiracy".58 He revealed that the Warburg controlled the American Jewish Committee that, opposed the anti-Nazi boycott, while their Kuhn Loeb and Co. had underwritten Nazi shipping. He further exposed the Warburg financing of pro-fascist political activities with their partners and allies, many of whom were major figures in the American Jewish Committee and B'nai B'rith (which formed the Illuminati Anti Defamation League in 1913).


Support for the Nazis by the Ashkenazi leadership was fundamental to Hitler! s war machine and this then led directly to the unimaginable suffering of the Ashkenazi masses in Germany. It was this very suffering that the Ashkenazi 'leaders', most notably the Rothschilds, used to campaign for a homeland in Israel ~ a land to which they had no blood or historical connection whatsoever.


After the war, leading Zionist fronts continued to support right-wing groups or ignore their actions when it suited them, Norman Finkelstein writes that,

“Jewish elites even enlisted in, and financially sustained, right-wing extremist organizations like the All American Conference to Combat Communism and turned a blind eye as veterans of the Nazi 55 entered the country."59

Why would the Rothschilds and other leading 'Jewish' families do all this to their own people?


It is a horrendous thought and doesn't make sense, surely?


To understand why this can happen - and why the Bush family can so abuse 'fellow' Americans - we need to appreciate that the Illuminati elite have a different bloodline to the general population. They are a group unto themselves who are 'hiding' within other races and nations. The Rothschild family and company may have come out of the Khazar Empire, but we should not confuse that with the mass - of the former Khazar, now Ashkenazim, peoples. The Rothschild allegiance is not to them, but to the agenda of their real family, the nature of which I will reveal later.


In other words, a Rothschild plot isn't a 'Jewish' plot.


Erased from history

There is another important question that arises from all this. Even without 'Jewish'-Ashkenazi connection, the Khazar Empire was enormously significant to world history.


As Arthur Koestler says,

''The Khazars had their fingers in many historic pies".

The way the Khazars secured Eastern Europe from the invading Muslims alone is of massive significance. But were you ever told the history of the Khazars at school or anywhere else? Isn't it one hell of a coincidence that on one hand the Khazar story challenges the entire foundation of Zionism and on the other the Khazars and their background have been pretty much erased from history?


Benjamin H. Freedman, the former 'Jewish' businessman who campaigned ceaselessly against Zionism, said that in 1948, the year that Israel was founded, he addressed the large assembly of the highest ranking officers of the United States Army "at the Pentagon and told them about the Khazars and their relationship to the people of Israel. Afterwards, he said, he was approached by a lieutenant Colonel, the head of the history department of one of the largest and highest scholastic rated institutions of higher education in the United States".


The man had taught history there for 16 years, Freedman said, but he had never in all his career as a history teacher or otherwise heard the word ‘Khazar' before that day. Freedman told this story in correspondence with a Dr. David Goldstein in 1954.


He went on:

"Research ... revealed that [the Khazar 'Jews'] were never 'Semites', are not 'Semites' now, nor can they ever be regarded as 'Semites' at any future time by any stretch of the imagination. Exhaustive research also irrevocably rejects as a fantastic fabrication the generally accepted belief by Christians that the so-called or self-styled 'Jews' in Eastern Europe are the legendary 'Chosen People' so very vocally publicized by the Christian clergy from their pulpits.


Maybe you can explain to me, my dear Dr Goldstein, the reason why and just how the origin and the history of the Khazars and Khazar Kingdom was so well concealed from the world for so many centuries? What secret mysterious power has been able for countless generations to keep the origin and the history of the Khazars and, Khazar Kingdom out of history text-books and out of class-room courses in ' history throughout the world?

“The origin and history of the Khazars and Khazar Kingdom are certainly incontestable historical facts; these ... facts also establish beyond any question of doubt the origin and history of the so-called or self-styled 'Jews' in Eastern Europe. The origin and history of the Khazars and Khazar kingdom and their relationship to the origin and early history of the so-called or self styled 'Jews' in Eastern Europe was one of history's best kept secrets until wide publicity was given in recent years to my research on this subject.


Do you not think, my dear Dr Goldstein, that it is time this whole subject was, dragged out of its hiding place?” 61

That was written in 1954. We are still waiting...


There Is no Jewish 'race'

The evidence insists that we must go even further than suggesting the Ashkenazim are not genetically 'Jewish'. There is, in fact, no such thing as a Jewish 'race', just as there is no Aryan 'race' in the way it is portrayed, by the white supremacists. These are fabrications of history.


What should 'race' matter anyway? It's all illusion and childish beyond belief.


Later in the book, when we explore the illusory nature of reality, we can appreciate even more profoundly the, nonsense of 'race' and how stupid it is to judge people on the genetics of their body. In truth, no race exists, except in the minds of the people, as we shall see. It is all illusion. Unfortunately 'race' and its related historical rights and claims are used as a political tool and source of mind manipulation. This is why I am spending time exposing some of the background.


There are people who follow the Jewish faith all over the world. There are white 'Jews', brown 'Jews', black 'Jews', Spanish 'Jews', Chinese 'Jews' etc., etc, that follow that belief system and good luck to 'them so long as they don't force it on anyone else. If they want to call themselves 'Jewish' on the basis of their faith then please feel free; it's none of my business. But there is not a Jewish 'race', let alone a 'chosen people'. Arthur Koestler points out that people calling themselves 'Jewish' across the globe have fat mote in common genetically with the "host" population than they do with each other.


This was highlighted by Professor Juan Comas in his work, The Race Question in Modern Science, published, by UNESCO, and by Raphael Patai in the Encyclopaedia 'Britannica:

"The findings of physical anthropology show that, contrary to popular view, there is no Jewish race. Anthropometric measurements of Jewish groups in many parts of the world indicate that they differ greatly from one another with respect to all the important physical characteristics - stature, weight, skin color, cephalic index; facial index, blood groups, etc." 62

Harry Shapiro produced the same assessment in his UNESCO work, The Jewish, People: A Biological History:

"The wide range of variation between Jewish populations in their physical characteristics and the diversity of the gene frequencies of their blood groups render any unified classification for them a contradiction in terms. For although modern racial theory admits some degree of polymorphism or variation within a racial group, it does not permit distinctly different groups, measured by its own criteria of race, to be identified as one.


To do so would make the biological purposes of racial classification futile and the whole procedure arbitrary and meaningless. Unfortunately, this subject is rarely wholly divorced from non-biological considerations, and despite the evidence efforts continue to be made to somehow segregate Jews as a distinct racial entity. 63

The reason for the latter is obvious by now. It is to sell a false history and biology both to the mass of those who consider themselves 'Jewish' and to the rest of humanity. How can you claim to be a special race, a 'chosen people' considered by 'God' to be above all others; and with special rights given by 'God' to own a certain piece of land, when there is no such thing as a 'Jewish race'?


Even the 'Jewish nose' is only a facial feature of a fraction of 'Jewish' people and, here's the point, the same "Jewish nose" is found in far greater numbers today among the Caucasian tribes and the Turks of Asia Minor.


Among the truly Semite peoples it is not seen at all. For goodness sake, when you go back to the Biblical stories you find that Abraham, the alleged 'father' of the Jews, is claimed to have had a child with Hagar, an Egyptian, and the same theme applies to other heroes like Joseph, Moses, David and Solomon. Their Biblical wives, sexual partners or parents came from peoples like the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Zidonians, Hittites, Geshurites and so on.


During the Babylonian exile the 'Israelites', including members of the priestly families, married Gentiles. As Koestler says, even before the Diaspora (the 'Scattering') 'the Israelites were a thoroughly hybridized race'. (I will explore the origins of the 'Israelites' and their/star' names later).


This 'hybridization' applied to most historic nations, writes Koestler,

"and the point would not need stressing if it were not for the persistent myth of the-i3iblical Tribe having preserved its racial purity throughout the ages." 64

He concludes his excellent book:

"To sum up, the Jews of our day have no cultural-tradition in common, merely certain habits and behavior patterns, derived by social inheritance from the traumatic experience of the ghetto, and from a religion which the majority does not practice or believe in, but nevertheless confers on them a pseudo-national status ... the lingering influence of Judaism's racial and historical message, though based on illusion, acts as a powerful emotional break by appealing to tribal loyalty." 65

This emotion and fear, engendered not least by the events of Nazi Germany, are mercilessly exploited by their self-appointed 'leaders' who know the real background. The Ashkenazi 'leaders' have no more concern for the plight of Jewish people than the Bushes have for Americans. They are following an agenda and all people, no matter what their race or label, are fodder to be used and abused in its name.


If those leaders were not so obsessed with race, and special rights through race, this section of the book would not have been necessary, but the record needs to be straightened for racist and 'anti-racist' alike. To think that what happened in Germany is being used to advance a fascist agenda turns my stomach. But it is.


I have detailed some of the' background to Israel and its prominent supporters because the suppression of these facts is being used in the manipulation of the 'war on terrorism' and the conquest of the Arab world.


Familiar faces

It was Ashkenazi ancestors of the Khazar people who were behind-the Clean Break document produced for Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996 that called for Israel to "shape its strategic environment", starting with the removal of Saddam Hussein and the installation of Hashemite monarchy in Baghdad.


With Iraq brought under Jordanian Hashemite influence, Jordan and Turkey would form an axis along with Israel to weaken and "roll back" Syria, it said. Jordan could also undermine Lebanon by "weaning" the Shia Muslim population away from Syria and Iran and re-establishing their former ties with the Shia in the new Hashemite kingdom of Iraq, the document said.

"Israel will not only contain its foes; it will transcend them." 66

To achieve this, the document stated Israel would have to win broad American support for these new policies and it advised Netanyahu to present them,

"in language familiar to the Americans by tapping into themes of American administrations during the Cold War which apply well to Israel" .67

The Guardian article revealing the contents of the document pointed out that there is little to distinguish the 1996 Clean Break paper from the outpourings of other "right-wing and ultra-Zionist think-tanks". Nor do the similarities end there.


The leader of the 'prominent opinion makers' who wrote the paper for Netanyahu was Richard Perle, now-chairman of the Defense Policy Board at the Pentagon and a major player in the orchestration of the war against Iraq (and whoever next). Another author was ... Douglas Feith, the neo-conservative lawyer, now under-secretary of policy at the Pentagon, who is also at the forefront of the US agenda for the conquest of the Middle East.


Two others were David Wurmser and his wife, Meyrav, who was co-founder of Memri, a Washington-based charity that “distributes articles translated from Arabic newspapers portraying Arabs in a bad light".68 David Wurmser worked with Perle at the American Enterprise Institute and is now at the State Department as a special assistant to John Bolton, the Under-Secretary for arms control and international security. Bolton is yet another front-line manipulator of the invasion of Iraq, as I mentioned earlier.


Meyrav Wurmser told the BBC that the Clean Break document was:

"No more than a mental exercise done in a think tank by a group of people. Yes man of us [behind the Bush policies] are Jewish, there's no need to apologize to anyone for that. Most of us, all of us in fact, are pro-Israel, some of us more seriously so than others, but we have no problem at all with criticizing Israel." 69

James Colbert of the Washington-based Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (Jinsa) was also an author of the Israeli Clean Break report in 1996.


It says that one of its aims is,

"to inform the American defense and foreign affairs community about the important role Israel can and does play in bolstering democratic interests in the Mediterranean and the Middle East".

In practice, as the Guardian article pointed out, this largely involves,

" ... sending retired American military brass on jaunts to Israel after which many of them write suitably hawkish newspaper articles ' or letters to the editor" .70

There are also business relationships between retired US military officers' on the Jinsa board and American companies supplying weapons to Israel, but don't ever mention Israel's massive stockpile of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons.


Shhhhh! They don't exist, OK?


Sam Hamod, a former advisor to the US State Department, said:

"Israel at this time has a huge stock of atomic weapons, thanks to our assistance. Israel also has major supplies of anthrax and other poison weapons, again, thanks to the assistance of the US Government who at one time feared Arab attacks on Israel These are the reasons that Israel will not allow atomic inspectors into Israel and will not sign the vaunted, American-pushed, Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty that America wants everyone else to sign, and uses pressure to achieve this, but never on Israel.

"As to the poison weapons, neither America nor Israel will sign this accord banning poison weapons because they have so many in their security vaults. Thus, to many experts in the world, the US attack on Iraq for WMD and poison weapons, was very much a bald-faced farce, without merit, when two of the biggest abusers of atomic proliferation and poison weapons were the ones calling for the war, America and Israel (and of course, followed by the poodle himself, Tony Blair, who has his own weapons secrets that have not yet seen the light of day)." 71

When Saddam Hussein offered in 1990 to destroy such weapons, if Israel: did the same with theirs, the United States government said it was not willing to negotiate on that subject - not least because to publicly accept that Israel has a massive nuclear capability would make illegal the billions of dollars of US aid to that country every year.


They all know of Israel’s nuclear stockpile, but if no one officially admits it exists they can go on with business as usual. This was further exposed in a BBC television documentary in the Correspondent series in 2003 that revealed how this you-don't-say-anything-and-I-won't agreement is known as "nuclear expediency".


The program highlighted the inhuman treatment of Mordechai Vanunu who had already been jailed for 17 years, 11 of them in isolation, for warning the world about the production of atomic weapons in Israel. Vanunu worked for ten years in the Dimona 'Atomic Research Reactor' in the Israeli southern desert region and told a reporter from the London Sunday Times about the secret production of nuclear weapons in underground levels under that reactor.


The report was published in October 1986 and Vanunu was kidnapped in Rome by the Israeli intelligence agency Mossad and shipped to Israel, where he was secretly, tried and convicted. In retaliation for the program, the Israeli government press office, a department of the Prime Minister's Office, banned BBC correspondents in Israel from contact with government ministers and officials and from official press conferences.73


Daniel Seaman, the head of the press office, said the broadcast had served those who "demonize Israel and anti-Semitic elements". Here we go, yawn, yawn. The truth is that the behavior of the Israeli government demonizes Israel without any help from anyone else.


Seaman also added that the broadcast was something a 'democratic' [sic] State like Israel cannot tolerate.74


The Jinsa pincer

The Israeli Clean Break document called for the very agenda that has been unfolding since the Bush administration came illegally to power. The authors of the paper were closely connected with Jinsa, the Ashkenazi-controlled Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs.


Today, at the heart of the Bush administration's policy on, the conquest in the Middle East, are:

  • Dick Cheney, Vice-President, Jinsa member, formerly on its advisory board:

  • Paul Wolfowitz deputy Defense Secretary, and a highly prominent member of Jinsa;

  • Richard Perle, Clean Break report author, Iraq war architect, who serves on the Pentagon Policy Board, Jinsa member;

  • Douglas Feith, Clean Break report author, Jinsa member

  • David Wurmser, Clean Break report author, Jinsa member, who is now special assistant to John Bolton, the Under Secretary for arms control and international security, another Jinsa member;

  • James Woolsey, Jinsa member and former director of the CIA who was reported to be lined up to become the minister of 'information' in the post-war Iraq.

These, in turn, connect into the far-right "think tanks" in the United States like the Project for a New American Century that produced the blueprint for conquest in September 2000.


This was a mirror of the Clean Break document and has formed the basis for the Bush administration's policy of mass murder and acquisition in the Middle and Near East. How can these facts not be fundamentally connected and what chance do the Arab nations have of being treated justly find with respect given the agenda of those in control of the gathering war against them?


These people wanted to see the invasion and takeover of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon and Saudi Arabia and that list is now being ticked off.


Tom Neumann, executive director of Jinsa, told the Bush dominated, Moonie, Washington Times, how he believed (knew) the face of the Middle East would be changed:

“Jordan will likely survive the coming war with US assistance, so will some of the· sheikhdoms. The current Saudi regime will likely not. The Iran dissident movement would be helped enormously by the demise of Saddam, and the Palestinians would have to know that the future lies with the West. Syria's Ba'athist dictatorship will likely fall unmourned, liberating Lebanon as well. Israel and Turkey, the only current democracies in the region, will find themselves in a far better neighborhood." 75

As I write, the demonization of Syria and Iran is underway through people like the 'dove' (you must-be bloody joking) 'Colon' Powell and Jinsa member Paul Wolfowitz, the Deputy Defense Secretary. The US government accused the Syrian: regime of President Bashar al-Assad of state terrorism, developing weapons of mass destruction and harboring fugitive Iraqi officials.


Colon said:

"We will examine possible measures of a diplomatic, economic or other nature as we move forward." 76

White House spokesperson Ari Fleischer branded Syria a terrorist state; Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld claimed Syria had carried out a chemical weapons test "over the past 12, 15 months"; and Israeli Prime Minister Ariel 'Khazar' Sharon joined the offensive, describing Assad as "dangerous". He urged Washington to put "very heavy ... political and economic pressure" on Syria.77 It is history repeating, the same technique they used with Iraq: lies, lies, lies.


Wolfowitz told the Senate armed services committee:

“The Syrians are behaving badly. They need to be reminded of that, and if they continue then we need to think about what our policy is with respect to a country that harbors terrorists or harbors war criminals; or was in recent times shipping things to Iraq." 78

You can't speak the truth - it's racist

It has all been planned for a long time and they now have to invent the excuses to carry out the agenda of mass slaughter and control. The way this inhUIl1tulopolicy was played out against Iraq is due to be repeated over and over on the road to global domination. But speak or write an of these highly relevant facts and you are labeled (inaccurately from every angle) an anti-Semite.


What, for telling the truth?


Yes, especially for telling the truth, that's the point of the smear.


Tam Dalyell is a veteran Labour MP who has campaigned against countless wars and, like his colleague George Galloway, was a vocal opponent of the invasion of Iraq. Dalyell said that Bush and Blair were being unduly influenced by Jewish ministers and officials who had an agenda for Israel that did not allow fair and equal treatment of the Arab world.


He referred to a cabal in the United States based on the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (Jinsa) and later said he was referring to people like Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, John Bolton, Douglas Feith and Ari Fleischer, Bush's press spokesman.

"Those people drive this policy", he said.79

He also highlighted the role of Blair's unelected Middle, East envoy, Lord Levy, who is not a member of the government and cannot be questioned by parliament. Were these fair points made with freedom of speech? Oh no, not in the brave new world.


Professor Eric Moonman, president of the Zionist Federation, who was a Labour MP from 1966 to 1979, said he was seeking advice on whether there was a case for referring Dalyell's remarks to the Commission for Racial Equality under the law of inciting racial hatred. "I believe there is", hesaid.80 Well, let me tell you what I believe, Professor Moonman. I believe that if Dalyell had said that Bush and Blair were being unduly influenced by Arab, Irish, Scottish, Welsh, Dutch, German or French etc., etc., ministers and officials, Professor Moonman's silence would have been deafening.


So where's the real racism?


Indeed what can be more racist than to claim you are the "Chosen People" and above all others? , Anti-Semitism' is a smokescreen used to stop legitimate debate and Dalyell's treatment is just another example. It is very enlightening to look into the cesspits in which wallow the major organisations behind the 'anti-Semitic' smear campaigns.


The Anti-Defamation League, which has tried hard to stop me having a public platform in countries like Canada, operates by defaming people in line with its Orwellian remit. The ADL manipulates unthinking, unquestioning mind fodder to man the 'anti-Semite' protests, most of them gleaned from the ludicrous 'Left' (as opposed to the ridiculous 'Right'). Too many on the Left wear their hearts on their sleeves and their brains in a dark place where the Sun don't shine.


They are child's play for the manipulators. Ironically, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the major orchestrator of 'anti-Semite' protests, is about as far from 'the Left as you could imagine. It connects into Mossad and the global 'intelligence' network and to organized crime '(mostly the same thing, anyway). The ADL gave Mo Dalitz, the Las Vegas gangster, their 'Torch of Freedom' award in 1985 for donating millions of dollars to Israel. Dalitz Was an associate of the infamous mega-criminal, Meyer Lansky.


In 1993, ADL offices were raided by San Francisco police and the-evidence came to light that the 'antiracist' organization had illegally obtained information from Tom Gerard, a corrupt police officer, and Roy Bullock, a political informant and infiltrator on the ADL payroll since 1960. Bullock was employed as a 'fact-finder' or what we would call a spy. He would infiltrate not only openly 'anti-Semitic' groups, but also labor unions, pro-Palestinian, American Arab and anti-apartheid organizations, usually under false pretences.


Bullock, who was not Jewish, would then pass that information to the ADL. What a thought: an 'anti-racist' organization keeping files on anti-apartheid campaigners. The ADL even kept" file upon file" on liberal San Francisco Jews who disagreed with Israeli policies. The files included Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers, addresses, phone numbers and group memberships. Some of the information was sold to foreign governments, including Israeli and South African intelligence groups.


Pete McCloskey, a former Republican congressman from San Mateo County, was an attorney in the law suits against the ADL. He Wants the government to revoke its tax-exempt status (no chance).


Since they obviously are working in conjunction with the Israeli government, he said, they should register as such.

"Referring to themselves as an education group is simply a sham", the attorney said.81

Dr Alfred M. Lilienthal the author of There Goes the Middle East, The Other Side of the Coin; and The Zionist Connection, said the ADL was,

"ever ready to apply the smear and vilification to censure and silence, thus building an iron curtain over America that would bar any criticism, however constructive, of Israel, Zionists, or Jews (Judaism is rarely, if ever, involved), ... " 82

He said that without exaggeration the ADL was the single most influential organization in the United States:

"It works closely with the Israeli intelligence agency, Mossad, and sometimes with the FBI or CIA. Through its multi-fold activities and ability to crush dissent, it is probably more responsible for American attitudes and American foreign policy toward the Middle East than any other single force ... Through its multiple private and public reports and publications, allegedly directed against prejudice and bigotry, the ADL can exert enormous influence and intimidation, often bordering on blackmail, in organizations and individuals, particularly people in public life.


It provides an indispensable backup for ... effective lobbying of the Congress and White House on behalf of an ever-increasing economic and military aid to Israel ... Many ADL charges against critics of Israel and Zionism are totally inaccurate, questionable, or based upon half-truths. Its secret and confidential reports, widely distributed in liberal circles, often attribute the stock quotation, 'but some of my best friends are Jews,' to its subjects, implying anti-Semitism. Odious .impressions are created by twisting or distorting a few words, or the context in which they were uttered." 83

I sure know that to be true. After Israel's attacks on Lebanon in 1996, with the massacre of more than a hundred civilians at Qana, Ari Shavit, a columnist with the newspaper, Haaretz, said that Israel could act with impunity because "we have the Anti-Defamation League ... "84


Its key role is to target those who are challenging the Illuminati agenda by branding them racists and the ADL definition of 'anti-Semitic' gets wider by the day. The ADL's Nathan Perlmutter claimed that the "real anti-Semitism" in America consisted of policy initiatives "corrosive of Jewish interests", such as affirmative action, cuts in the defense budgets, and neo-isolationf1t1I\~ as well as opposition to nuclear power and even electoral reform.85


Any questioning of the ADL is racist, or, as sociologist John Murray Cuddihy, put it:

"Not only does anything Jews do or refrain from doing have nothing to do with anti-Semitism, but any attempt to explain anti-Semitism by referring to the Jewish contribution to anti-Semitism is itself an instance of anti-Semitism!" 86

The ADL is headed by an Ashkenazi called Abraham 'Abe' Foxman, who claims to be a "Holocaust survivor", but never saw the inside of a concentration camp or suffered persecution by the Nazis because they believed he was a Christian.


Foxman accepted $100,000 for the ADL from the mega-crook billionaire, Mark Rich, and then advised him to seek a pardon for his crimes. Months later Rich's lawyers filed for a pardon and Foxman wrote to President Bill Clinton on ADL notepaper in support of the application. The pardon was granted by Clinton in his last hours in office amid enormous ontroversy.87


Foxman had suggested the pardon to his friend, Avner Azulay, an agent for Israel’s Ashkenazi spy agency, Mossad, who was head of the Rich Foundation that has donated a total of at least $250,000 to the ADL.88 Rich's lawyer was Lewis Libby, Cheney's Chief of Staff, and a member of the Project for the New American Century. The web is enormous. The brilliant Israeli writer, Israel Shamir, highlights the Zionist (Ashkenazi/Khazar) Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in an article on his website.89


Shamir says of Foxman and other 'anti-Semite' propagandists:

"The chief proponent of this well-endowed movement is an American [Ashkenazi] Jew, the head of ADL, Abe Foxman. Two years ago he was caught taking large sums of money from the super-thief Marc Rich, a crook who cheated the American taxpayer and found refuge in Switzerland. For years Foxman and his organization collected dossiers on people who objected to apartheid and sold them to Mossad and to the South Africa of Forster. They broke into houses, stole documents and ran professional surveillance of the left activists in California.

"Last year, Foxman and ADL were found guilty in the US court of law, and paid millions of dollars to people they intimidated and smeared. Foxman's best chum is Ariel Sharon, the mass murderer of Sabra, Shatila, Kibie and Jenin. A new book by Gordon Thomas and Martin Dillon, 'The Assassination of Robert Maxwell: Israel's Super Spy' confirms the professional philo-Semites [those who brand their opponents "anti-Semites"] have permanent ties with Mossad, the long arm of Israeli apartheid, memorable to you by the Lillehammer murders. In brief, the philo-Semites are sleazy guys taking money from sleazy crooks in order to cover up the creeping genocide of Palestinians ...

" .;. It’s not strange, as the very emphasis on 'anti-Semitism' is disgustingly racist, as if it were worse than racism against anyone else. People who decry 'anti-Semitism', instead of 'racism' or 'ethnic-prejudice', are actually saying that there is something really special - and particularly bad - about discrimination against this one particular group. In other words, they are racists." 90

Sam Hamod, a former advisor to the US State Department, said the Anti Defamation League (ADL) had made a fortune in donations by conning most media networks and most people in the world into believing an untruth about Jewish history and suppressing the Khazar origins. He said that when the ADL called someone critical of Israel, Zionists or Zionism, an "anti-Semite", this was pure nonsense. He said he was not "touting for people who are anti-Jewish or anti-Arab or anti-any ethnic or racial group".


Those who stereotyped or attacked others based on their race or ethnicity were dead wrong and should be condemned, he said:

"But so too should those who abuse labels and use them wrongly to stop others from being justifiably critical should also be condemned, and in this case, I am referring to the ADL and other groups of that sort who label people with impunity and carelessness, sometimes wrecking their careers, their reputations, their businesses and their lives!

"Unfortunately, the misuse of the label, 'anti-Semitic' and its consequences have been so bad that even presidents, senators, congress people, media giants and all others in the world cringe at being labeled, 'anti-Semitic' by some Zionist, Israeli or ignorant religious, media or social group. Little do they know they are, being victimized by charlatans of the language who have found a label" that they throw around with impunity and for which there has been little or no come-back." 92

It was time for media people and non-linguistically literate scholars, politicians, religious leaders and others to become educated about the truths about "Semitic" and its misuse, he said.

"If not, we'll continue to allow charlatans to abuse our language and to continue their name-calling, abusing others, including Jews, Arabs, Americans, Brits and others by calling them 'anti-Semites' if they speak against Israel (which is not a Semitic state) or Zionists (a political group, not exclusively Jewish and which has nothing to do with Semitic)." 93

The claims of "anti-Semitism" have served the Ashkenazi leadership magnificently.


Dr Nahun Goldman, former president of the World Jewish Congress, said:

"Current decline of overt anti-Semitism might constitute a new danger to Jewish survival ... The disappearance of anti-Semitism in its classic meaning, while beneficial to the political and material situation of Jewish communities has had a very negative effect on our internal life." 94

Leo Pfeffer of the American Jewish Congress also said it was possible that some anti-Semitism is necessary in order to insure Jewish survival, or rather the survival of Zionism.


Norman Finkelstein has seen it all before:

"By the 1970s, anti-Semitism was no longer a salient feature of American life. Nonetheless, Jewish leaders started sounding alarm bells that American Jewry was threatened by a virulent 'new anti-Semitism'. The main exhibits of a prominent ADL study ('for those. who have died because they are Jews') included the Broadway show, Jesus Christ Superstar and a counterculture tabloid that 'portrayed Kissinger as a fawning sycophant, coward, bully, flatterer, tyrant, social climber, evil manipulator, insecure snob, unprincipled seeker after power' - in the event, an understatement.

"For organized American Jewry, this contrived hysteria over a new anti-Semitism served multiple purposes. It boosted Israel's stock as the refuge of last resort if and when American Jews needed one. Moreover, the fund-raising appeals of Jewish organizations purportedly combating anti-Semitism [like the ADL] fell on more receptive ears. 'The anti-Semite is in the unhappy position', Sartre once observed, 'of having a vital need for the very enemy he wishes to destroy. For these Jewish organizations the reverse is equally true. With anti-Semitism in short supply, a cutthroat rivalry between major Jewish 'defense' organizations - in particular, the ADL and the Simon Wiesenthal Center - has erupted in recent years." 96

Don't do as I do - do as I say

These are the organizations and methods used to ~top·tt1.Vestigation into those at the heart of power as I, and many others, have found. Those on the Left who fall for this are helping to create the very fascist society they claim to be opposing.


Here is a definition of fascism: a system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socio-economic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism; a political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.; oppressive, dictatorial control.


Recognize it?


This is the world we are living in now and they have hardly started yet. Fascism is not a race and it is not a body, it is a state of mind. Anyone of any race is capable of promoting fascism. The Left does not seem able to grasp that simple reality.


BBC reporter Steve Bradshaw said in his Panorama documentary on the neo-cons':

"By now we had picked up a recurrent theme of insider talk in Washington. Some ' leading neo-cons, people whisper, are strongly pro-Zionist and want to topple regimes in the Middle East to help Israel as well as the US."

But he said he had been told by “a congressional staffer ” to be careful how he used the word neoconservative because people might say he was being anti-Semitic.


We have reached such, an the outrageous stage ill the destruction of free speech that it is now 'anti-Semitic' to point out that the Bush administration is carrying out a campaign of conquest that suits Israel perfectly while controlled by people with fundamental loyalties to Israel. Professor Eliot Cohen, the close friend of his former college dean, Paul Wolfowitz, is on the US Defense Policy Board and involved with both the American Enterprise Institute and the Project for the New American Century.


He took the same old tired line when asked by Steve Bradshaw why he was "concerned about the suggestion that American policy was all a conspiracy whipped up by a group of neo-conservative hawks, who are somehow allied to Israel".


Cohen replied:

"Well sometimes the word neo-Conservative is used when what they would really like to say is Jews."

'They' being who?"

"People that use that kind of language and as a Jew I find that offensive. There are two things that are despicable about it. The first the implication of duel loyalty ... and speaking as someone who's father served in the United States army, who served the United States army himself, Who has a son in the United States army, I find it deeply, deeply, offensive and untrue. And the other thing I find deeply offensive about it is it contains anti-Semitic cadre. Which is that the Jews, this scattered little people around the world, have these occult powers and are pulling the strings of the naive and duped non-Jews. And it wasn't that long ago that those kind of beliefs led to hideous things that impinged upon me very directly. So yes, I feel very strongly about it. " 97


I wonder if Arabs, the truly Semitic people, are deeply, deeply offended by Cohen saying that the Third World War was against communism and the Fourth World War is against militant Islam?" 98


Can you imagine what Cohen would say if the neo-cons were called agents of militant Zionism?"


Or if the Israeli army that has killed thousands of Palestinian civilians was referred to as Jewish terrorists".


No, no, that's anti-Semitic".

But what is the difference?


Rabbi Yaacov Perrin was quoted in the New York Daily News as saying, "One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail." 99 That is actually anti-Semitism against the truly Semitic people, the Arabs. If anyone said that about a person calling themselves Jewish they would be dubbed racist and, in some countries like Canada, arrested under 'Hate Crime' laws.


Why is it racist to use the words Jewish or Israel, but not when you do the same with Arabs or Islam? Rabbi Ahron Cohen said in a statement for the orthodox Jewish, anti-Zionist, Neturei Karta group:

"It must be clear that opposition to Zionism and its crimes does not imply hatred of Jews. On the contrary Zionism itself and its deeds are the biggest threat to Judaism." 100

But as I write, Rick Santorum, the Republican Senator of Pennsylvania, bas proposed a law that, in effect, prohibits the criticism of Israel on American college campuses by threatening the universities with federal funding cuts if they allow students and staff to publicly criticize Israel. 101 Santorum was the guy who supported the 'Syrian Accountability Act', which accuses Syria of backing 'terrorism' and devel9ping weapons of mass destruction.


In true Orwellian fashion, his plan to ban freedom of expression was called "ideological diversity" legislation while actually seeking to suppress such diversity. Criticism of Israel would be an act of "anti-Semitism" (impossible when Israel is controlled by people that are not Semitic!. The Kansas Senator, Brownback, who is known as a staunch backer of Israel, called for a federal commission to be established under the Higher Education Act to investigate any "anti-Semitic" incidents on US campuses." 102


Better watch criticism of Arab people, then, because they are the Semites. According to the New York Sun, the proposals followed a meeting attended by the Illuminati Anti-Defamation League exposed earlier by Israel Shilmir.103 The ADL is the creation of B'nai B'rith that issued a statement in 1933 opposing any boycott or exposure of the Nazi regime in Germany.


Once again, can you imagine what would happen if it was proposed that criticism of Arab countries should be banned from American campuses under the threat of stopping education funding? The same people proposing it with regard to Israel would be screaming and hurling abuse about anti-Semitism. What better example could there be of Israel Shamir's point?


To propose a ban on criticizing Israel without demanding the same for Arab countries and, indeed, every other, is sheer undiluted racism! It is illusory racism, mind, when there is no such thing as a 'Jewish race'.


Israel's apartheid

The extreme forms of Jewish or Ashkenazi belief; as outlined, for instance, in the Babylonian Talmud, are stunningly racist and what c1ffi*you say about statements like this from Rafael Eitan, a Likud leader of the Tsomet faction:

"The only good Arab is a dead Arab ... When we have settled the land, all the Arabs will be able to do about it will be to scurry around like drugged cockroaches in a bottle."I04

Of course, this is not the view of the people in general, not at all. But this is the view of the extreme group that was connected to Adolf Hitler and the Nazis and, have controlled the State of Israel since it was terrorized into existence in 1948 by Ashkenazi terror groups like Irgun and the Stern Gang (also called Lehi) that produced later prime ministers such as Yitzhak Shamir and Menachem Begin.


Shamir once wrote in Hazit, the journal of Lehi:

"Neither Jewish morality nor Jewish tradition can be used to disallow terror as a means of war ... We are very far from any moral hesitations when concerned with the national struggle. First and foremost, terror is for us a part of the political war appropriate for the circumstances of today." 105

So it is more than a bit rich for these same people to issue their holier-than-thou condemnations of terrorism and racism when Israel was created through terrorism· and is based on institutional racism written into the law of the land. 'Jewish' or Ashkenazi people can travel to Israel, declare citizenship, and be granted all the privileges that are denied to Palestinians who have lived in that land for hundreds of years.


Even the 'Jewish' population is divided into levels of privilege decided by genetic origin. The white Ashkenazim from Europe and America are by law at the top of the pyramid of privilege. Below them in Israel's genetic caste system are the Sephardic Jews or Mizrahim (the "Eastern Ones"), who came from Arab countries and do have an historical connection to the Middle East.


Sephardic people are descended from 'Jews' who were expelled from Spain in 1492. They lived in peace with the Arabs for hundreds, sometimes thousands, of years before the Ashkenazi arrived in numbers from Europe in the mid-20th century under the banner of the Rothschild-controlled political movement called Zionism.


Rabbi Ahron Cohen said in a statement for the anti-Zionist Neturei Karta group that the connection between Muslims and Jews goes right back into ancient history.

"Mostly the relationship was friendly and mutually beneficial", he said, "Historically, the situation frequently was that when Jews were being persecuted in Europe they found refuge in the various Muslim countries. Our attitude to Muslims and Arabs can only be one of friendliness and respect." 106

The Sephardic Jews were kept in corrugated iron transit camps where Ashkenazi officials tried to strip them of their" Arabness" by replacing their "unpronounceable" Arab names with good 'Jewish' names. Most had to work ten to twelve hours a day in disease and squalor. Their high death rate was explained by one Zionist official as a “common and natural thing".107


Yemeni" Jews in particular faced extraordinary discrimination as they were transported, often against their wishes, from Yemen to Israel and held in primitive camps. Yemeni babies were stolen from their mothers and given for adoption to Ashkenazi families. Doctors, social workers and nurses worked together to kidnap 600 Yemeni-Jewish babies, telling their parents they had died and giving them to childless Ashkenazi couples.


In the early 1990s, a high-profile campaign began to try to reunite some of those shattered families. Professor Ella Habiba Shohat, an Iraqi-Jewish Israeli who teaches at City University of New York in Manhattan, has highlighted the suppression of 4 Sephardic Jews in Israel Her 1992 book, Israeli Cinema: East/West and the Politics of Representation, shook the Israeli establishment with its exposure of racism.


She said of her upbringing in Israel:

"It was taboo to speak Arabic in school and whenever teachers wanted to chastise us, they would refer to us as 'you Moroccan' or 'you Iraqi' or 'you Yemeni', ... Jews from the Middle East were expected to abandon their Middle Eastern traits, so we grew up without studying our history or culture. It was all the more tragic for Palestinian Israelis, who couldn't even read about Arab history in textbooks. "108

At the bottom of the genetic pile in the apartheid of 'free, democratic' Israel, come the black Jews from Ethiopia, who are treated appallingly. But even they are placed by la~ above the Palestinians. Israel is a fundamentally racist state in which the minority, the Ashkenazim, dominate and dictate to the Sephardic/ Arab majority on the basis of genetic origin. A report by the US organization, Human Rights Watch, said: "There is no general prohibition of discrimination or guarantee of equality in any of Israel's Basic Laws.


Indeed, equality was explicitly excluded from the Basic Law: Human Freedom and Dignity when it was drafted. 109


A personal story

Jack Bernstein, an American Ashkenazi, moved to Israel from the United States, lured by the propaganda about the Jewish homeland. What he experience sickened him and he detailed what he witnessed in an article entitled lithe "Life Of An American Jew In Racist-Marxist Israel".110


He said that Zionist propaganda has led the American people to believe that Zionism and Judaism are one and the same and that they are religious in nature. This, he said, was a blatant lie. "Judaism is a religion; but Zionism is a political movement started mainly by East European (Ashkenazi) Jews who for centuries have been the main force behind communism and socialism", he writes. The ultimate goal of the Zionists, said Bernstein, is a one-world government under the control of the Zionists and the Zionist-oriented International Bankers.111


He said that after the 1967 Arab-Israeli war Jews in. America were filled with pride that" our homeland" had become so powerful and successful. They had also been manipulated by false propaganda that Jews in America were being persecuted, he said.

"Between 1967 and 1970, approximately 50,000 American Jews fell for this Zionist propaganda and migrated to Israel. I was one of those suckers".

Bernstein had no emotional conflict with leaving the United States because those calling themselves Jews are allowed to have citizenship of both Israel and America, although this does not apply to any other Americans. Soon after arriving in Israel, Bernstein fell in love with Ziva.


She was a,

"Sephardic Jewess from Iraq who, like myself had for the Zionist propaganda and had migrated to Israel".

Jack and Ziva were married and that's when he realized he was living in a racist state. He said that for the first three years of their marriage they had to live with Ziva's aunt "because of the critical housing shortage in Israel and because of racism".


He said this was the genetic system used to allot housing:

  1. First choice goes to Ashkenazim who have lived in Israel for many years.

  2. Second in line are Ashkenazim from Europe, especially if they marry an Israel-born Ashkenazi.

  3. Third are Ashkenazi from the United States, even better if they marry an Israel-born Ashkenazi.

  4. Only after all of the above are housed do Sephardic Jews, with an historical connection to this region, have a choice of whatever is left.

  5. At the bottom of the list come the Muslims, Druze and Christians.

Jack Bernstein writes that even though he was an Ashkenazi from the United States, he was placed lower on the list for housing because he had married a Sephardic Jewess. He said that employment opportunities were allocated in the same way: the Ashkenazim get the best jobs; Sephardic Jews are next; while Muslims, Druze and Christians filled the menial jobs with the great many left unemployed.


The Shas Party in Israel was specifically formed to address the discrimination against Sephardic people by the Ashkenazi elite. Israel is founded on outrageous racism of the most appalling and sinister nature. It is no less $an apartheid and yet Ashkenazi organizations like the Anti-Defamation League go around hurling the label "racist" and" anti-Semite" at everyone else.


Bernstein dismissed the very idea that Israel is either free or democratic.


It is, he said, a racist state:

"The Ashkenazi Jews, who migrated to Israel from Germany, while sympathetic to communism and support it, tend to favor the practices of. Nazi-style fascism. During World Warp in Germany these elite Zionist Ashkenazi Jews worked closely with Hitler's Gestapo in persecuting the lower class German Jews and delivering them to concentration camps. Now living in Israel, these elite Zionist Jews, who were well trained in Nazi style fascism and favor it, have imposed many facets of fascism on Israel.

"To give the impression that Israel is a democracy, members of the Knesset (Israel's Congress) are elected - but an odd kind of election. This is where Israel's so-called democracy stops. It doesn't make any difference which party wins an election, the Likud or the Labor party, the elite Zionist Jews rule in a dictatorial manner - giving favors to the elite clique and brutally suppressing any dissent.

"Concerning Nazism/fascism ease let me clear a point. Germans are an admirable people - I dare say even great. But in Germany, the general population were victims of the Nazis who through cunning and brutality gained power. In Germany, the average Jews were victims of the Zionist elite who worked hand in hand with the Nazis. Many of those same Zionist Jews, who, in Germany, had worked with the Nazis, came to Israel and joined hands with the Zionist/communist Jews from Poland and Russia. It is the two faces of communism and Nazi-style fascism that rule Israel. Democracy is merely an illusion.

"Regarding the tie between the elite Ashkenazi Jews and .the Nazis, take a look at the word 'Ashkenazi' ,look again - 'Ashkenazi,' Interesting isn't it?"

Norman Finklestein, in his book, Image And Reality Of The Israel-Palestine Conflict, compares Israel's treatment of the Palestinians to the apartheid of South Africa and the view of the American settlers to native Americans.


Asked if Israel was a democracy, he said:

"Was South Africa a democracy in the old days? it was a democracy. or whites, for the 'superior people'. Similarly, Israel, for the larger part, of its history, has been a society where half the population has all the rights and half the population has none." 113

There can be no more blatant example of this in Israel than the 'wall', actually part-wall, part-fence, cutting off Israel from the Palestinian areas along a 150 mile 'border' decided by the Israeli government.


This has parted Palestinian families, including fathers and mothers, from their wives, husbands and children, and destroyed the livelihoods of Palestinian farmers by putting their land on the Israeli side of the wall Qalqilya, once known as the West Bank's "fruit basket", is cut off . on three sides from the farms which supply its markets and the second-largest water sources in the region. Access to the 40,000 inhabitant town consists of a single Israeli checkpoint.


But don't say anything, it's anti-Semitic.


The many defamed by the few

The terrible potential irony is that the manipulations of the neo-cons in America on Israel's behalf, and the actions of Israel, are going to be seen as a 'Jewish plot' when the overwhelming majority of such people on this planet are victims of the plot, not perpetrators of it. Indeed the Ashkenazi neo-cons and those in control of Israel are not even Jewish.


But all 'Jewish' people get tarred by the uninformed and the truly racist with the same label as the manipulating few.


Washington, journalist Jim Lobe, a long-standing opponent of anti-Semitism and an investigator of the neo-cons since the 1970s, made this same point:

"It's no secret; the majority of neo-conservatives have been and remain Jewish. That is a fact. They do not represent the view of a majority of the American Jewish community."

He was asked if it was legitimate to talk about the pro-Israeli politics of so many neo-conservatives.

"Well, I think it's very difficult to understand them if you don't begin at that point. I would think people would want to talk about that rather openly because to the extent that you suppress it; I think then it festers." 114

Well said Jim. But how can the Ashkenazim from what is now southern Russia, who converted to Judaism and have no genetic or historical connection to the land of Israel, really be regarded as 'Jewish' in the sense that they claim? How can they be?


Is a German or Russian who converts to the Church of England regarded as English? Of course not. The fact is that the American and Israeli governments are currently so close you can't see the join, but you are a racist if you say that this relationship is clearly not going to' produce a policy that gives justice to the Palestinians or other Arab nations.


John Hamre, who runs the Center for Strategic and International Studies, was only stating the obvious when he pointed out that,

"We're so close to Israel so one-sided, that people in the Middle East don't take us seriously" .115

A former US ambassador and White House aide quoted in the UK Daily Telegraph said:

"One congressman, Jim Moran, said that if it weren't for Israel, we wouldn't have been going to war, and he was accused of anti-Semitism. Because of the atmosphere of war, deference to the President and the huge power of the Israeli lobby, we didn't even have a debate about whether we should go to war. We simply jumped into it." 116

Arthur Schlesinger, the former special assistant to President Kennedy, said the United States was totally dominant "except in the case of Israel-Israel dominates US".117


People should be free to makes all the points because it is highly relevant to what is happening in the Middle East and affects us all. This is not a Jewish plot for global control as some suggest. It is a conspiracy by a fascist mind-set that can infest the consciousness of anyone no matter what their racial or ethnic background.


There are white American, British and Europe fascists; Arab fascists; black African fascists; Chinese fascists; Argentine fascists; and there are Ashkenazi fascists. If we ire going to expose the web that is daily entrapping more of our basic freedoms, we must refuse to have that fact edited by those who use the smokescreen of 'racism' to stop the exposure of those involved in the global dictatorship.


The Fourth Reich, or the overt re-emergence of the Third, is now imposing itself on our lives. It is time to face up and grow up arid stop seeing the world in the juvenile polarities of black and white, us and them, good guys and bad guys, good race and bad race, at programs the reality of the political Left, Right and Centre.


There are shades of grey and that's where we need to look if we want to find out what is really happening .



1 "Playing Skittles with Saddam", The Guardian, September 3rd 2002

2 Ibid

3 Ibid

4 Arthur Koestler, The Thirteenth Tribe: The Khazar Empire and Its Heritage (Random House 1976)

5 "Israel: A monument to anti-Semitism", by Greg Felton, Media Monitors Network, August 1st, 2001,

6 The Thirteenth Tribe, p 81
7 Ibid, P 19

8 Ibid, pp 21 to 22

9 Dr Sandor Nagy, The Forgotten Cradle of the Hungarian Culture (Patria Publishing Co. Ltd., Toronto, 1973)
10 S. N. Kramer, The Sumerians (University of Chicago Press, 1963) p 306, see also http://www.hunmagyar.orgjhungary/hlstory/controve.htm


12 S.W. Baron, A Social and Religious History of the Jews (New York, 1957)

13 The Thirteenth Tribe, p 145

14 Ibid, P 147

15 Ibid, P 152

16 Ibid, P 179 17 Ibid

18 Ibid, p 17

19 "A Jewish Defector Warns America", by Benjamin H, Freedman, a speech given at the Willard Hotel in Washington, DC in 1961,
20 Genesis 10:3

21 I Chronicles 1:6

22 Yiddish language, Britannica Concise, Britannica Online, ebc / article?eu=408461

23 Sent by Lord Balfour from the British Foreign Office, November 2nd 1917

24 "Hillary, blonde ambition and my life as the wife of a Rothschild", by Paul Palmer, London Evening Standard, July 2nd 2003, p 23 and "Rothschild goes to Labour's aid", The Sunday Times, July 27th 2003

25 "Declaration on 'the Palestine issue'" by Neturei Karta of the UK to be brought to the attention of Members of Parliament, MABLondon03.cfrn

26 Ibid


28 http://www.israelshamir.netj

29 See his books like The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering (Verso Books, 2001) and Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict (Verso Books, 2001)
30 Irish Times, May 7th 2003

31 Ibid

32 The Holocaust Industry, p 88

33 Ibid, P 108

34 "Holocaust: The Uses of Disaster", Radical America, July-August 1983, p 15

35 The Holocaust Industry, PP 54-55

36 Ibid, P 75
37 Ibid, p 46

38 Ibid, P 82

39 Ibid
40 "Everybody's Victim" by Elie Wiesel, New York Times Book Review, October 31st, 1965

41 The Holocaust Industry, p 70

42 Irish Times, May 7th 2003


44 "Semitic is a Language Group, Not a Racial or Ethnic Group", by Sam Hamod, PhD, June 26th 2003 http:j jwww,todaysaltemativenews.comjlndex.phP?event=link,l50&values [O]=1&values[1]=754

45 Ibid


47 Ibid

48 "Declaration on 'the Palestine issue'" by Neturei Karta ()f the UK to be brought to the attention of Members of Parliament, http://www.nkusa.orgjactivities/recent/MABLondon03.cfm

49 Ibid
50 "Israel: A monument to anti-Semitism", by Greg Felt9n, Media Monitors Network, August 1st, 2001,

51 See for this information and a long list of links detailing Bush family crimes.

52 BBG News Online, October 8th 2002,

53 "Israel: A monument to anti-Semitism", by Greg Felton, Media Monitors Network, August 1st, 2001,

54 Ibid


56 http://www.usisrael.orgjjsource/Holocaust/Rosenbergl.html

57 Ernst Hanfstaengl, Hitler - The Missing Years (London, 1957)

58 New Masses periodical, January 29th and February 5th 1934

59 The Holocaust Industry, p 15
60 The Thirteenth Tribe, p 99

61 Letter by Benjamin H. Freedman to Dr. David Goldstein of Boston, Massachusetts, written on October 10th 1954

62 Raphael Patai, 'Jews', Encyclopaedia Britannica, Vol. XII, 1973 printing.

63 The Thirteenth Tribe, p 186

64 Ibid, p 187

65 Ibid, pp 225-226

66 "Playing Skittles with Saddam", The Guardian, September 3rd 2002

67 Ibid

68 Ibid
69 Panorama, SSC-l, May 18th 2003

70 "Playing Skittles with Saddam", The Guardian, September 3rd 2002

71 The Myth of Tiny, Little Israel: Zionist Tentacles Everywhere by Sam Hamod, PhD, June 25th 2003, [0]=1&values[1]=749

72 Boston Globe, April 14th 1990

73 "ssc World TV Points Its Finger On Israel's Armament With Weapons of Mass Destruction", by Hans Lebrecht, an Israeli journalist and publicist living in Kibbutz Beit-Oren, July 6th 2003,

74 Ibid

75 "Playing Skittles with Saddam", The Guardian, September 3rd 2002

76 •• 2-1Q-1460_1348087.OO.html

77 Ibid

78 "We're only after the guilty", says Powell, Reuters, April 12th 2003. Also see 79 "Dalyell May Face 'Race Hatred' Inquiry", by Nicholas Watt, The Guardian, May 5th 2003

80 Ibid

81 "Adversaries go inside ADL's spying operation", San Francisco Examiner, July 18th 2003

82 "The Changing Role of S'nai S'rith's Anti-Defamation League" by Dr Alfred M, Lilienthal, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, June 1993, p 18

83 Ibid

84 The Holocaust Industry, p 78

85 Ibid, p 37

86 Ibid, p 51

87 "Jewish Leader Suggested Rich Pardon A Year Ago Writing On Official Stationary Was A Mistake, He says", by Verena Dobnik, Associated Press, ADL/pardons/ChicagoTrib240301.html

88 Ibid

89 "Discussion on Anti-Semitism", Israel Shamir Website,

90 Ibid

91 Sam Hamod, PhD, Semitic is a Language Group, Not a Racial or Ethnic Group, June 26th 2003, http://www.todaysaltemativenews.comjindex.php?event=link,15O&values[0]= ·1&values[1]=754

92 'Ibid

93 ibid

94 "Israel as a Settler Nation", by Adib Rashad, boardjmsgsj10077.html

95 Ibid

96 The Holocaust Industry, p 34

97 Panorama, SSC-l, May 18th, 2003
98 Ibid

99 New York Daily News, February. 28th 1994. p 6

100 "Declaration on 'the Palestine issue'" by Neturei Karta of the UK to be brought to the attention of Members of Parliament,,tactivities/recent/ MABLondon03.cfm

101 article.php?story=20030425223210445

102 Ibid

103 New York Sun. April 15th 2003

104 Noam Chomsky, Fateful Triangle (South End Press, 1999), pp 129 to 130

105 Yitzhak Shamir, Israeli Prime Minister and Zionist terrorist in an article titled "Terror", written for Hazit, the journal of Lehi, August 1943

106 "Declaration on 'the Palestine issue'" by Neturei Karta of the UK to be brought to the attention of Members of Parliament, recent/MABLondon03.cfm

107 Adam Hanieh, Israel: divided by racism, 1997/283/283p19.htm


109 http://www.hrw.orgjreportsj2001jisraeI2jISRAEL0901-13.htm


111 Ibid

112 Ibid

113 Irish Times, May 7th 2003

114 Panorama, BBC1, May 18th 2003

115 "An American Odyssey, Part One", by Graham Turner, Daily Telegraph, June 16th 2003, pp 13-15

116 Ibid
117 Ibid

Back to Contents


Back to The Khazar - The Thirteenth Tribe