The Goddess and the King

Agencies under the control of this spider’s web of interconnecting families and interests were responsible for the murder of Diana, Princess of Wales. Of that I have no doubt. But please don’t take my word for this. Look at the evidence and judge for yourself. 

Many people dismiss the idea that Diana was assassinated because it would be impossible to kill her in a public situation and then cover up the evidence. After all, there would need to be coordination between so many different agencies. Well that’s precisely what happened in the United States with the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy in 1963 and that was even more difficult to cover up. It wasn’t staged as an accident which immediately creates the diversion of was it an accident or was it murder?


The Kennedy assassination was quite clearly murder. He literally had his brains blown out in front of hundreds of onlookers and it was captured on film by one of them, Abraham Zapruder.


In. . And The Truth Shall Set You Free, I feature the Kennedy killing in detail and you will see that the same people who supported or arranged the assassination were also appointed to the commission of the Chief ‘Justice’ and 33rd degree Freemason, Earl Warren, to investigate what happened! Among the Warren Commission ‘team’ were Allen Dulles, the head of the CIA sacked by Kennedy, and the paedophile, rapist, Bohemian Grove member and pornographer Gerald Ford, who would later become President of the United States after Richard Nixon was removed by Watergate. When Representative Hale Boggs, the only Catholic on the Commission, began to question its findings, he died in a plane crash. How convenient.

Jim Garrison, the New Orleans District Attorney, is the only man to charge anyone with Kennedy’s murder. This was the CIA operative and former wartime friend of Winston Churchill called Clay Shaw. Garrison failed to win a conviction against the guilty-as-hell Shaw because many of the key witnesses were murdered before the trial. Garrison was astonished at the way apparently unconnected agencies, including the Dallas police, the FBI, the press, and the Washington establishment, could work so obviously as one unit to carry out the assassination and then cover it up.


This was possible because of the networks I have been exposing in this book which have their operatives, ‘gofers’ and yes men, in all the agencies representing all sides and shades of opinion. Getting on for 40 years after the murder of President Kennedy in a public street on a public occasion we are no nearer to anyone being convicted. As usual the ‘culprit’ was identified immediately by those who were really responsible and he was eliminated so he couldn’t contradict the official ‘tale’. For Lee Harvey Oswald in Dealey Plaza, Dallas in 1963, read Henri Paul in the Pont de L’Alma Tunnel, Paris in 1997.


Once the scapegoat has been sacrificed, no other story is entertained by the authorities and public interest wanes with the weeks, months and years. It’s an old and well tried technique. A President is killed in a public assassination; Lee Harvey Oswald, the scapegoat or ‘patsy’, is murdered in public a few days later; and those who orchestrated their demise go to their graves unexposed and unconvicted. The Princess of Wales could not be murdered in a staged accident and the whole thing covered up? You’ve got to be kidding.

As I’ve described the background to the Kennedy assassination in a previous book, I won’t repeat it all again here, but there are elements to that story that need to be highlighted and added to. Diana’s family, the Spencers, are of an Elite bloodline and so are the Kennedys, who come from the Kennedy clan of ancient Ireland and later Scotland. They are descendants of the Irish king, Brian Boru, also known as Brian Caeneddi, which later became O’Kennedy.


They were the Lords of Ormond in what is now called north Tipperary.1 From around 1600 a Scottish branch of the Kennedys can be identified and this intermarried with the Irish line.2 The Scottish Kennedys became a powerful strand of the aristocratic bloodlines of Scotland and married into Scottish royalty. One notable Kennedy was Archibald Kennedy, the 15th Earl of Cassillis, better known as the Marquess of Ailsa. He lived from 1872 to 1943 and held many leading positions in the Grand Lodge of Scottish Freemasonry including Grand Principle.3 He was a member of the key Holyrood House Lodge no 44 in Edinburgh which has close ties with the British royal family.4


In the 18th century, a Matthew Kennedy from Ireland went to Paris to work with his good friend, the Illuminati frontman called Saint Germain, who presided over the Illuminati Lodge at Ermenonville near Paris.5 The lodge took part in blood rituals on an altar made from human bones.6 This Kennedy produced a work called A Chronological, Genealogical and Historical Dissertation of the Royal Family of the Stuarts who connect into the Merovingian line established in France. The JFK wing is related to the Fitzpatricks, a powerful Irish family with a coat of arms which includes the classic Brotherhood symbols of three fleur-de4is, a dragon, and a lion.7 It seems likely that the Fitzpatricks go back to France and the Holy Grail story.

The family of JFK’s wife, Jackie Bouvier Kennedy (later Onassis), are related to the Auchinclosses, one of the major Elite Scottish bloodlines, via the marriage of Jackie’s sister into the Auchincloss clan. Other Auchincloss bloodlines have manifested as names like Bundy, Grosvenor, Vanderbilt, Winthrop and Rockefeller.8 Hugh D. Auchincloss Sr married Emma Brewster Jennings, the daughter of Oliver B. Jennings, who co-founded Standard Oil with John D. Rockefeller. James Shelby
Downard describes Jackie Kennedy-Onassis, Caroline (Lee) Bouvier, and the writer, Gore Vidal, as the ‘stepchildren’ of Hugh D. Auchincloss.9 Vidal has described John and Jackie Kennedy as the “Sun God and Goddess”10


The Bouvier bloodline has been traced back to Grenoble, France, where it is first mentioned in 1410 and Jackie’s great-great-grandfather, Eustache Bouvier, fought in a French regiment under the command of George Washington.11 It was noted earlier that the Kennedys also married into the Dukes of Devonshire family at Chatsworth House, one of the leading Brotherhood families in England. The marriage of John Kennedy to Jackie Bouvier was another arranged marriage by the Eastern Establishment, the American bloodlines who run the United States according to the Agenda decided in the British Isles and France.


Both bloodlines connect with the key centres of London and Paris. The fact that their marriage and presidency was known as ‘Camelot’ with its King Arthur and Mars connotations, is thoroughly appropriate because the King Arthur symbolism is used by the Brotherhood as part of their secret language. The Kennedy family have been closely involved with drugs, organised crime, the British monarchy, and the mind controlled slave operations like Project Monarch. This adds credibility to the claims by a recovered mind controlled slave I met who said she was taken to have sex with John F. Kennedy at the age of eleven - “Although they made me up to look about 16”.


The Kennedy presidency was certainly not the way it was portrayed at the time. Kennedy had a stream of sexual partners and three of them, Marilyn Monroe, Jayne Mansfield and Zsa Zsa Gabor, were also girlfriends of Anton LaVey, head of the Church of Satan. Jayne Mansfield was a high priestess. Other long term relationships included two with members of Elite Scottish bloodlines, Lady Jean Campbell daughter of the Duke of Argyll, and Kay-Kay Hannon Auchincloss12 of the family to which his wife was related. Behind JFK’s rise to fame was his father, Joseph Kennedy, a member of the Brotherhood’s Pilgrim Society. He was a crook with close connections to the Mafia and other organized crime.


His fortune was assured when Winston Churchill awarded him the franchise to import British liquor into the United States. Joseph Kennedy was an associate of the Rothschilds and the Bronfmans, another ‘Jewish’ crime family in Canada which owns the liquor giant, Seagrams. Among Joseph Kennedy’s contacts in Britain when he was US Ambassador to the Court of St James’s in London were the Astors and the Rothschild bloodline offshoot, the Sassoons. Another intimate friend was Sir John Wheeler-Bennett, a leading executive of the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Joseph Kennedy’s wife, Rose, came from the Black Nobility Fitzgerald family.

The Fitzgeralds were one of the mighty Black Nobility clans of Italy which supported William the Conqueror’s conquest of England in 1066. This established Black Nobility rule of the British Isles via ancient families like the St. Clairs/Sinclairs. So the ‘F’ in JFK was a Black Nobility family going back thousands of years. Rose’s father and JFK’s grandfather was John E (Honey Fitz) Fitzgerald, the vote-rigging mayor of Boston. The Fitzgeralds lived in Hanover Street near the former site of the Green Dragon Tavern in Boston, home to the St Andrews Lodge which was heavily involved in the manipulation of the American War of Independence and orchestrated the Boston Tea Party.13

Joseph Kennedy was a member of the Order of St John, the British version of the Knights of Malta, and the Bouvier family was intermarried with the Radziwills who established the Knights of St John/Knights of Malta in Poland in 1610 and also helped to establish the order in the United States.14 The Kennedys support the Knights of Malta hospice movement in the United States via the Kennedy Institute for the Study of Human Reproduction and Bioethics at the Jesuit-controlled Georgetown University.


The hospice movement, while presented with a compassionate face, is a front to gather support for euthanasia. Most people involved with the hospice movement are compassionate, it is the motivation of those who are manipulating it that I am talking about. Once euthanasia is accepted in law, it opens the floodgates for the legalised murder of what Kissinger calls the “useless eaters”.


As has been well documented in the countless biographies of JFK, he endured a loveless childhood under the iron rule of his father Joe and mother, Rose. He wasn’t even told that his brother Teddy had been born and it was only when he came home from boarding school that he realized he had a new brother. There were no hugs, no show of affection, and the Kennedy children were not allowed to show pain. His upbringing has all the classic signs of the mind control techniques the Elite use on their own children.


Prince Charles went through exactly the same upbringing under his aggressive and deeply unpleasant father, Prince Philip. JFK was groomed from an early age to take high office for the Brotherhood and he was supported by all the classic names like the Rothschilds, Tafts, Russells, Rockefellers, and media barons like Henry Luce, the head of Time-Life, and Randolph Hearst, the most powerful newspaper tycoon in the United States. When Kennedy ran for political office, the Boston American newspaper, owned by Hearst, refused to accept the paid advertisements of his opponent.15

But when JFK and his brother, Bobby, became President and Attorney General of the United States after their defeat of Richard Nixon in 1960, it seems that they began to pursue policies and people that were far from conducive to the introduction of their paymasters agenda. This included withdrawal from the Vietnam War, the introduction of some interest-free money, an assault on organised crime (in public at least) and, as Kennedy put it, a pledge to break up the CIA “Into a thousand pieces”. It doesn’t matter who you are, if you don’t do as you are told, you are removed in the most appropriate way, bloodline or not.


The Agenda is far greater than any individual or family. I can’t help thinking, however, that there was more to the assassination than this and it has the feel of a long planned sacrificial murder, in accordance with the Brotherhood’s ancient ritual laws. The location of the assassination, Dallas, Texas is close to the 33rd parallel of the 33rd degree of latitude. The top level of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry is the 32nd degree and the 33rd degree is only for those who have contributed significantly to the Great Work, the takeover of Planet Earth. Dealey Plaza is a mass of esoteric symbolism and is officially named after a 33rd degree Freemason called George Bannerman Dealey, an early executive of the Dallas Morning News.


Dealey means ‘goddess line’. Ley can also mean rule or law in Spanish, so translating as ‘goddess-rule’. Either is perfect symbolism for the Brotherhood, especially the latter. Dealey Plaza, the site of the first Freemason temple in Dallas, is shaped like a pyramid with the capstone missing (see Figure 51 overleaf). The top is truncated by a railway bridge. The main pyramid is cut into two more by Main Street which runs directly through the centre. It is, in fact, three pyramids, two inside the one: the trinity or triad.

Figure 51:

The pyramid with the capstone missing. This is
Dealey Plaza where John F Kennedy was assassinated.

Two energies interacting produce a third. If anyone thinks this is mere coincidence they should do a little research into the background of the Brotherhood secret societies at the top levels and see the staggering obsession they have with their symbols and rituals. Kennedy was killed near the so-called grassy knoll on the right of the pyramid and Lee Harvey Oswald was murdered while under police ‘guard’ in an underground car park at the bottom of the pyramid on Houston Street. Only a few yards separate the two points. The old Court House nearby which looks into Dealey Plaza is decorated with gargoyles. On top of the Court House is the symbol of the ancient Order of the Dragon or the Snake. Dealey Plaza, to the secret societies, is a Sun temple.

Kennedy was assassinated in an outdoor temple of the Sun by initiates of the Brotherhood network including the Knights Templar, the Knights of Malta, the Order of St John of Jerusalem, the Rosicrucians and the Freemasons. As James Shelby Downard writes:

“Masonry does not believe in murdering a man in just any old way and in the JFK assassination it went to incredible lengths and took great risks in order to make this heinous act correspond to the ancient fertility oblation of the Killing of The King” 16

Kennedy was shot just after noon when the Sun was “most high”. In ancient times it was said that when the Sun was “most high”, he was doing his father’s work in the temple (more symbolism used in the Jesus story). Kennedy was shot in the back, the head, and the throat, and they are the same wounds suffered by the mythical Hiram Abiff according to Freemasonic legend and initiation. Bill Cooper, a former operative with US Naval Intelligence, believes that the mythical Freemason hero, Hiram Abiff, is really a symbol for Jacques de Molay, the Grand Master of the Knights Templar when they were purged in France in 1307.


De Molay was burnt to death on the Ile de la Cite, the original Paris, in the shadow of Notre Dame Cathedral, which the Templar’s had built on a former site of worship to the goddess Diana. His death was ordered by the Roman Church Inquisition with support from King Phillipe the Fair, who could well have been under the control of the Priory of Sion. Cooper says that the assassination of JFK was the revenge of the Knights Templar against the Church, the state and the people. Kennedy is the only Roman Catholic President of the United States, the same Church of Rome which killed Jacques de Molay.


On Dealey Plaza today, standing near the points where Kennedy and Oswald were murdered, is the obelisk erected by the Freemasons after the murders. The obelisk is symbolic of the penis of Osiris in Egyptian legend and the one in Dealey Plaza has the flame or lighted torch at the top (see picture section). The eternal flame on the Kennedy grave in Arlington Cemetery is there for the same reason. The flame or lighted torch is the most obvious Brotherhood signature and on Kennedy’s grave the flame is within a circle, the ancient symbol of the Sun. Kennedy was also laid in state in the centre of a circle under the dome on Capitol Hill. There are 14 stones on the obelisk in Dealey Plaza, the number of pieces into which Osiris was cut by Set, according to Egyptian myth.


The one part that his sister-wife, Isis, could not find was his penis, represented by the obelisk itself. She replaced the penis of Osiris with one she made herself and this became the symbol of the Brotherhood. The Dealey Plaza obelisk was built for, and dedicated to, a Freemasonic lodge of the Scottish Rite. They have found stone phalluses in cathedrals and churches hidden inside altars and when the investigation team of New Orleans District Attorney, Jim Garrison, searched the home of Clay Shaw they found penises.

In this book I’ve exposed the secret language at its basic level, but the depth to which it goes is astonishing. The science of numbers and names is one of these deeper levels of communication and symbolism which only an advanced initiate or focused researcher would fully understand. Numbers and names are, once again, vibrational frequencies and the amazing synchronicity of these is due, I feel, to the law of what I call vibrational attraction.


Many of the number-name ‘coincidences’ will be consciously made to happen, but others are simply due to the energy field, the consciousness, of the person or people attracting to themselves vibrational fields which synchronise with the energy they are generating. This is how we create our own reality. Our inner self, our vibrating consciousness field, attracts other ‘fields’ -people, places, ways of life, experiences - which sync with the energy we are generating.


It’s a vibrational attraction between like energy fields. Therefore, our outer physical experience is merely a reflection of what is happening inside. What we vibrationally project with our attitudes and emotions, we attract back to us in people, places, ways of life and experiences which vibrate to the frequency we are projecting or broadcasting.


So when we change what is happening within us, we change our physical experience because one is a reflection of the other. It is this ‘magnetic’ attraction of like vibration to like vibration that leads to people living in streets of a certain name or having relationships with those of a certain name, etc., because everything has its own vibrational code, including sounds, numbers, words, colours and names. In ritual magic the correct sounds, words, incantations, and colours, are all used to manifest a desired energy field or vibratory field.


Sound is especially important and this is why the Phoenicians were concerned more with the sound of their words than their spelling. Mantras, the constant repeating of the same phrase or sound, are part of this same knowledge. And, like all knowledge, they can be used for good or ill. The training of Japanese Samurai warriors included instruction in producing the fighting cry, “Kiai”. This sound is supposed to cause a lowering of blood pressure and partial paralysis in the hearer. Thus we have a ‘bloodchilling’ cry. Low frequency sounds of three to five cycles a second can kill you.


The American researcher, James Shelby Downard, has written of this science of sounds, umbers and names in relation to the Kennedy assassination. The writer, Robert Anton Wilson, says in his book The Cosmic Trigger, that Downard’s theory is “The most absurd, the most incredible, the most ridiculous Illuminati theory of them all”. This makes me even more certain that Downard must definitely be on to something. My own research supports this, too.

Kennedy was killed on November 22nd 1963. This date was the anniversary of the order or papal bull by Pope Clement V for the Knights Templar to be subjected to torture by the Dominican Inquisition. It was issued on November 22nd 1307.


November is also the 11th month and if you add that to 22, again you have 33. John and Jackie Kennedy left Fort Worth on the morning of November 22nd 1963 and the plane came to a stop at gate 28 at Love Field Airport in Dallas. The number 28 is assigned the name ‘Beale’ in Solomonic cabalistic numerology. Beale is a word which derives in this way: Bel (El), Baal, Be al, Beal, Beale. These all relate to Sun gods.


The 28th degree of the Knights Templar is the ‘King of the Sun degree’. JFK was born at 83 Beal Street, Brookline, Massachusetts, on May 29th 1917. The ‘protection’ of the President on this fatal trip to Dallas was organised by the New Orleans CIA station which was housed in a Masonic temple building. Dallas is just ten miles south of the 33rd degree of latitude and the founding lodge of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry was in Charleston, exactly on the 33rd degree. The first atom bomb was exploded at the ‘Trinity’ Site on the 33rd degree of latitude.


The Kennedy motorcade travelled down Elm Street once home to the Blue Front Tavern, the meeting place for Freemasons, and at 12.22 pm it arrived in Dealey Plaza. Elm Street was known as ‘Bloody’ Elm Street because it was the scene of countless gun fights, stabbings and other acts of violence. The national offices of Texaco Oil are on Elm Street. Close to Dealey Plaza is the Trinity River which used to flood the Plaza for many years until the introduction of flood defences. Into this open air temple of the ancient Brotherhood came Jackie Kennedy, representing the goddess, the Queen of Love and Beauty and her scapegoat Sun King, John E Kennedy.


He was the sacrifice in the ancient ritual of the Killing of the Sun King: the ‘Ceannaideach’ which is Gaelic for Wounded Head. Kennedy, of course, was shot in the head. I have it from a very good source that Kennedy didn’t die until the following spring. My source claims that the ‘Kennedy’ who appeared in the post mortem photographs was J. D. Tippet, the police officer and Kennedy look-alike who was supposed to have been shot by Oswald with a gun that wasn’t working!

When JFK was 22, a sculpture was made of him as a winged angel and it was presented to the Vatican where it was used as part of a panel in which the angel hovers over St Therese as she writes in a book.17 After the assassination, Kennedy’s body was code-named ‘Angel’ and the same name was used for the plane, Air Force 1, which flew his coffin back to Washington.’8 Both Kennedy and Oswald were buried in places related to ‘Arlington’.


Kennedy at the Arlington National Cemetery near Washington DC and Oswald at the Rosehill Cemetery, near Arlington, Texas. Arlington is a word related to Freemasonic sorcery and pertains to necrophilia, a morbid attraction to corpses. Oswald is Os or Oz, the Egyptian Sun god Osiris as in the Wizard of Oz. If you are looking at the synchronicity in the science of names and numbers, look at the astonishing coincidences between the assassinations of JFK and Abraham Lincoln, who was also killed by the Brotherhood. Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846 and Kennedy was elected to Congress in 1946.


Lincoln was elected president in 1860 and Kennedy was elected president in 1960. Lincoln’s assassin, John Wilkes Booth, was born in 1839 and Lee Harvey Oswald, the alleged assassin of Kennedy, was born in 1939. Their successors were both called Johnson. Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 1808 and Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy, was born in 1908. Lincoln’s secretary was called Kennedy and Kennedy’s secretary was called Lincoln. Both presidents were murdered on a Friday in the presence of their wives and both were shot in the head.

Kennedy’s vice-president, Lyndon Baines Johnson, had prior knowledge of the assassination and when he became president he immediately reversed all the policies on Vietnam, interest-free money, and the CIA which Kennedy was implementing. The Brotherhood Mother Goddess, Arizona Wilder, says she saw the shape-shifting Johnson at sacrifice rituals. Johnson’s middle name, Baines, comes from the related Scottish clans of Bain, Bayne, Beathy, Binnie, Beath and Beth. Freemasons from these clans claim the same ancestor.19


The term, Mac, means ‘son of’ and so the son of Bain becomes MacBain and the interconnected clan, Beth, becomes MacBeth, the Scottish king made world famous by the writings of ‘William Shakespeare’. Bain in French means bath and this is an origin of the Order of the Bath title awarded by the British monarch. Purification or absolution baths are given to the Masonic ‘Knights of the Bath’ before they cause murder and mayhem on the Brotherhood’s behalf. After her husband’s death, Jackie Kennedy journeyed to the island of Delos in the Aegean Sea which is considered by legend to be the birthplace of the goddess Diana and Apollo the Greek Sun god. Diana (the Moon) and Apollo (the Sun) are often brought together in Brotherhood symbolism. Delos is also known as the Island of the Dead because another version of the goddess Diana, known as Hecate, is said to be the patroness of the ‘infernal arts’.


Jackie went on to the Temple of Apollo at Delphi in Greece and in the ruins of a Greek theatre on that site she performed an ancient rite known as the Greeting of the Sun. She performed this, according to James Shelby Downard, “With the expertise of an Aleister Crowley”.20 Another stop on her tour was the island of Santorina with its reputation for vampires. The origin of the vampire stories are the blood drinking and blood sucking rituals of the Brotherhood and their ‘energy sucking’ rituals, also. The vampire stories put the truth before our eyes in a way that we think is only fiction. This is something the Brotherhood loves to do via its biggest vehicle for communication, Hollywood, a name which comes from the holly bush, the holly (holy) wood of the Druid magicians. Hollywood is called a place of magic. Exactly what it is. It’s playing with our minds, manipulating illusions.

There are so many similarities between the Kennedy assassination, the ritual killing of a Sun King, and that of Diana, Princess of Wales, in what I am convinced to have been a ritual murder of the Moon goddess known to the ancients as Diana. It was planned that Kennedy would die on that spot at that time long before he became president and so, I believe, Diana was groomed for at least many years to die in Paris at that spot at that time, also. It is quite possible that this was planned from their childhood, even birth. I know how extreme that sounds, but when you study the Brotherhood in depth you realise very quickly that they are not formulating their plans weeks or months in advance, but literally centuries.


From the lower fourth dimension they have a very different perspective of time in this dimension than we do. In the concluding chapters I will look in more detail at this and how and why such ritual assassinations are performed with such an eye to detail. Planning the murder of the Roman Catholic John Kennedy, the Sun King, to mark the anniversary of the Roman Church’s Inquisition against the Knights Templar (or some other ritual) could quite obviously have been agreed decades in advance and the scapegoat decided and groomed for office. In the same way, Diana’s birth to the bloodline family the Spencers in 1961 could have led to her being chosen as a symbol of the goddess Diana who would be led to a ritual death in an ancient sacred place of Diana worship and sacrifice, the Pont de L’Alma tunnel in Paris.


I think there is an excellent chance that this is what happened. Just as Kennedy was manoeuvred into the presidency in 1960 for his ritual murder in 1963, 50 Diana was manoeuvred and manipulated into a marriage with Prince Charles and, finally, into the Pont de L’Alma tunnel. People say that to arrange the murder of Diana would have involved enormous planning and a great deal of time. Yes, that’s probably right. But they had plenty of time.

Diana Frances Spencer was born at Park House on the Queen’s Sandringham estate in Norfolk on July 1st 1961, the third and youngest daughter of Viscount Althorp, later the 8th Earl Spencer, and his first wife Frances Roche. Her parents separated when she was six and divorced in 1969, and her mother married the wallpaper tycoon Peter Shand-Kidd. Diana had a younger brother, Charles, the present Earl Spencer, and two sisters, Jane and Sarah.


Another son was born before Diana, but he died and she believed that her parents would much rather she been a boy, a son and heir. Diana said that her childhood was very unhappy and she was to crave all her short life for the love and warmth denied her as a child. Living at Sandringham she knew the Queen from the time she was a little girl and she used to play with the royal children. It is said that Charles first saw Diana when she was still in her pram. She remembered, with less than affection, being shunted over to the Queen’s residence during the holidays year after year to watch the film Chitty Chitty Bang Bang.


The choice of movie is interesting because it was written by Ian Fleming, the intelligence agent, friend of Aleister Crowley and author of the James Bond novels. The movie features a king and queen who hate children. They employ a child catcher to lure children, abduct them, and put them in a cage. They are then taken to the castle and locked in a dungeon. It is all symbolism for what is actually happening and there is no way that the Windsors played this for Diana so often by accident. Certainly Diana was already picking up the Windsor ‘vibes’ at Sandringham.


She told Andrew Morton in his book, Diana: Her True Story:

“The atmosphere was always very strange when we went there and I used to kick and fight anyone who tried to make us go” 21

So the Windsors were well aware of Diana from the moment she was born. When she was 13, Diana moved from Norfolk to live at Althorp in Northamptonshire, the Spencer family’s ancestral home, after her father inherited the title of Earl Spencer.


Diana was particularly devastated when her father married Raine, the daughter of the novelist Barbara Cartland. Diana had a deep loathing for her. She said in Diana: Her True Story that in September 1989 she had unleashed her years of frustration on Raine:

“I told her what I thought about her, and I’ve never known such anger in me. I remember really going for her gullet”. I said “If you only knew how much we all hated you for what you’ve done, you’ve ruined the house (Althorp), you spend all daddy’s money, and for what?”

The empathy that Diana had with people in emotional distress came from her own emotional scars which she carried all her life.

The Spencers are an Elite bloodline family. They are cousins of the Spencer-Churchills and related to the Marlborough family at Blenheim Palace in Oxfordshire, where Winston Churchill was born. Other forebears included the Duke of Marlborough, Sir Robert Walpole, and the Spencer family inherited a considerable fortune from Sarah, Duchess of Marlborough. They also married into the Cavendish family, the Dukes of Devonshire at Chatsworth House, and that offshoot became known as Spencer-Cavendish.


Diana shared common ancestors with Prince Charles in the 3rd Duke of Devonshire and, most significantly, King James I, the first Stuart king of England and Scotland and sponsor of Francis Bacon. It was King James who played a highly influential role in the expansion of the Brotherhood, the formation of the Virginia Company which still controls the United States, and the creation of the King James version of the Bible. Diana was also descended through several lines from the Stuart kings, Charles II and James II, which connected her, as with James I, to the Merovingian bloodline in France.


Charles II had so many children out of wedlock that goodness knows where some of their bloodlines are today. One thing’s for sure, the Brotherhood will know. As Elite families go, the Spencers are an important bloodline and Diana was related to countless aristocratic lines, including the Earls of Lucan. Further afield the Spencers have blood ties with many leading American families and they are distantly related to the Rockefellers. They have a long history of serving the monarch and the tradition continued with Diana’s father.


He was equerry to King George VI (who was married to the Queen Mother) and to Queen Elizabeth. Diana’s sister, Jane, is married to Sir Robert Fellowes, the Queen’s Private Secretary at the time of Diana’s death. Both of Diana’s grandmothers, the Countess Spencer and Ruth Lady Fermoy, were inner circle members of the Queen Mother’s court, as were four of her great aunts. The Spencers and the Queen Mother were very close and it was Lady Fermoy and the Queen Mother who manipulated Diana into her marriage with Prince Charles. This could be most significant when you hear about the true nature of the Queen Mother.


The countdown to the marriage began when Diana met Prince Charles at Althorp while he was having a relationship with her sister Sarah, in 1977. Diana was 16, but it was three years later that the Windsors really made their move on her. With the Queen Mother and Lady Fermoy manipulating behind the scenes, she was invited to a dance at Buckingham Palace to celebrate Charles’ 30th birthday. Then, in July 1980, a friend of Charles, Philip de Pass, asked her to stay with them while the Prince was there. In Diana’s own words, Charles was all over her and “He leapt on me practically”.22 He asked her to travel with him to Buckingham Palace the next day and an invitation followed to join the Windsors in the September at Balmoral, their residence in Scotland.

Eventually Charles asked her to marry him and she accepted. “I love you so much” Diana said to him. “Whatever love is” Charles replied.23 That is such a telling statement about the Windsors and the way they bring up their children. They don’t understand love because they give and receive so little. Imagine being a young child and having to line up with everyone else to shake your mother’s hand when she returned from an overseas visit.


That is how the Queen and Prince Philip treated Charles. Diana was a kindergarten nanny when the story of the relationship broke in the media and her life in the public eye and the constant spotlight had begun. So had her nightmare with the Windsors. Looking back, Diana could see that Charles had never been genuine in his affection for her. She realised even before the wedding that he was having a relationship with his real love, Camilla Parker-Bowles, and this continued and grew during their marriage.


Charles and Camilla communicated using the code ‘Gladys and Fred’. Camilla, like the Windsors, is close to the Rothschilds and on the first anniversary of Diana’s death, she was on the lonian island of Corfu enjoying the hospitality of Lord Jacob Rothschild.24 He has also spent £16 million leasing and restoring the Spencer’s 18th century mansion overlooking Green Park in London, close to Buckingham Palace.25

The Windsors wanted Diana to produce heirs with Spencer genes and that was all she was to them: an incubator. A week after her engagement to Charles, her bulimia began. This is an eating disorder in which you make yourself sick every time you eat food. Diana was throwing up three or four times a day and became desperately thin. As I mentioned in an earlier chapter, many victims of childhood sexual and Satanic abuse suffer from bulimia later in life.


She said that the bulimia was ‘triggered’ when Charles put his hand on her waist and said “Oh, a bit chubby here, aren’t we?” Bulimia is a disease of the emotions, as most diseases are, and Diana was in emotional turmoil even before the wedding. She described the attitude of Charles like this:

“He’d found the virgin, the sacrificial Iamb, and in a way he was obsessed with me. But it was hot and cold, hot and cold. You never knew what mood it was going to be, up and down, up and down... He was in awe of his mama, intimidated by his father, and I was always the third person in the room.”26

She met her sisters and told them she couldn’t go through with the marriage, especially with Camilla still on the scene, but they said she had no choice because “Your face is on the tea towels and you’re too late to chicken out”. Before the wedding, Diana stayed at Clarence House, the London residence of the Queen Mother. When she had arrived no-one was there to welcome her, she said, it was like going to a hotel.


Diana and Charles were married in St Paul’s Cathedral on July 29th 1981. That morning at Clarence House she said she felt calm, deathly calm: “I felt I was a lamb to the slaughter. I knew it, and I couldn’t do anything about it”.27 What prophetic words those would prove to be. They spent the first night of their honeymoon at the Mountbatten family estate at Broadlands in Hampshire before sailing around the Greek islands in the royal yacht Britannia (Barati). The bulimia got worse and she considered suicide, such was the scale of her unhappiness.

“My husband made me feel so inadequate in every possible way that each time I came up for air he pushed me down again. I hated myself so much”.

One of Diana’s royal duties in 1982 was to represent the Queen at the funeral of Princess Grace of Monaco, another victim of Brotherhood murder when the brakes on her car failed. Princess Grace, formerly the actress Grace Kelly, ran the Monaco branch of the Order of the Solar Temple with Jean Louis Marsan, the close friend of her husband, Prince Rainier.


The Windsors got what they wanted when Prince William was conceived. Diana was told that the birth had to be induced to fit in with Charles’ polo playing programme and the blond-haired, blue-eyed William was born on June 21st 1982, the summer solstice. Now first of all, what kind of father and husband insists that his wife and son be given needless drugs to suit his polo diary? And secondly, does anyone believe that was really the reason?


The Windsors are obsessed with astrology and the esoteric arts to such an extent that the psychic-astrologer mother of an Irish friend of mine could predict with uncanny accuracy the colours the Queen and Queen Mother would be wearing every day. She was correct again and again because she knew the colours connected to each day according to esoteric law. A family so steeped in Satanism, the esoteric mysteries, and the Sun cult, induce the heir to ensure he is born on the summer solstice, when the Sun is at the peak of its power, and that’s just a coincidence? No way.


He was christened William (after the Black Nobility William the Conqueror) Arthur (after the Sun God symbol, King Arthur) Philip (after the Duke of Edinburgh) Louis (after Louis Mountbatten). William’s first serious girlfriend, according to the British press, was Emma Parker-Bowles, the niece of his father’s lover, Camilla.


Prince Harry was born in September 1984 and Diana’s usefulness to the Windsors was over.

“Then suddenly as Harry was born it just went bang, our marriage, the whole thing went down the drain”, she told Andrew Morton.28

Diana and Charles separated in 1992 and divorced on August 28th 1996. Almost exactly a year later she was dead.

Diana lived in apartments at Kensington Palace or ‘KP’ as she called it. Prince Michael of Kent, the Grand Master of English Freemasonry, has his home there, also. The Brotherhood-Windsor machine attempted to destroy Diana’s credibility and public esteem. A tape of an intimate telephone conversation between her and the car dealer, James Gilbey, was released through the media in 1992. On the tape Diana said that Charles was a real torture. She told Gilbey:

“I’ll go out and conquer the world, do my bit in the way I know how and leave him behind”.

But despite, perhaps because of, the efforts to discredit her, Diana’s popularity continued and grew. Her unique combination of a big heart, a global public profile, and an intense desire to settle a score with the Windsors, threatened the very survival of
royalty. Her natural compassion and empathy with people were putting the emotionless Windsors in the shade and exposing them as out of date and irrelevant.


The naive, shy 19-year-old, who was enticed into the Windsor web, was now a woman who was realising her true power and was prepared to use it. She took the issue of landmines from obscurity to the front pages across the world and she had the platform to do that with any subject she chose. To the Windsors and the Brotherhood, this lady was dangerous with a capital D. She also knew many intimate secrets of the Windsors and the establishment. She knew where the bodies were buried as they say, and she had shown in her famous interview with the BBC current affairs programme, Panorama, in November 1995, that she was prepared to reveal some of them.


That interview, in which she talked of her unhappy relationship with the royal family in very forthright terms, did immense harm to the Windsors and they must have wondered what on earth she would do next. In my travels around the world I met a man who had a call from Diana in March 1997, a few months before she died. He was amazed when she said it was the Princess of Wales and he didn’t believe her at first, especially when she said that she was calling from a ‘supermarket phone’ in England. But Diana and this man had a mutual friend, and a close confidant of Diana told me that she often rang people from public phones, particularly from a department store in Kensingston, when she wanted to be certain the conversation would not be tapped.


Diana admired this man for his wisdom and knowledge. She said she had something to reveal that would shake the world and she wanted his advice on how best to do it. He will not reveal what she told him, but when I said that I knew she was aware of the Windsors’ connection to global drugs trafficking, he said: “Oh no, it was much worse than that”. You might get an idea of what it could have been later in this chapter. Diana knew far more than people realise, as we shall also see. But that was only one level of the plot to kill Diana.


At the highest level of the black magicians who control the Brotherhood networks, I have no doubt that her death had long been planned according to their ancient and deeply sick ritual. These two levels, the practical need to remove her (lower initiates) and the need for a ritual killing of the ‘goddess Diana’ (highest initiates) would run side by side, exactly as they did with President Kennedy.

The final sequence of events which led to her death involves, at almost every turn, a man called Mohamed Al Fayed, the Egyptian ‘owner’ of Harrods, the top people’s store in Knightsbridge, London, and the father of Dodi Fayed who died in the crash with Diana. Al Fayed also owns the Ritz Hotel in Paris. This is the guy who bleats on and on about the need for “truth” and “justice” over the death of Diana and yet he would not recognize truth if it bit him on the bum.


You can always tell when Mohamed Al Fayed is lying - his lips are moving. He fought a long, public, and vicious battle for control of Harrods and the House of Fraser with Tiny Rowland, the head of another Brotherhood front, Lonrho, the London-Rhodesia company, which has been responsible for so much manipulation of Africa and Africans. At one stage there was a Department of Trade and Industry inquiry into the Harrods takeover and it concluded:

“The lies of Mohamed Fayed and his success in ‘gagging’ the press created a new fact: that lies were the truth and the truth was a lie”.29

This would be a suitable epitaph for what Private Eye, the British satirical magazine and others, have dubbed: The phony pharaoh. The report also revealed that Al Fayed had lied about his family background. He had claimed to come from a wealthy Egyptian family and it was this money, he said, that he was using to buy Harrods. In fact he comes from a far from rich family and he didn’t have any such money of his own. He was born on January 27th 1929 in Alexandria, the son of a school inspector.


He sold Coca-Cola in the streets and later knocked on doors selling Singer sewing machines. It was an introduction to Adnan Khashoggi, now the world’s most famous arms broker, which changed his life. Khashoggi was the son of the personal physician to the King of Saudi Arabia and the Khashoggis employed ‘Al’ Fayed (then Mohamed Abdel Moneim Fayed) in their business ventures.


He later fell out with the Khashoggi family, apparently, and proceeded to lie his way through a stream of business deals which made him a lot of money from setting up deals for others and taking a commission. The construction company, Costain, was one of his main sources of income in the early days, but he made nothing like as much money as he claimed to be worth. See Tom Bower’s book, Fayed, The Unathorised Biography, for the detailed background.30


Al Fayed’s involvement with the Haiti dictator, Papa Doc, led to interest in his activities by the CIA. One CIA report on him remarked that:

“He strikes one as being friendly and evil at the same time”.31

While he became wealthy by the standards of the rest of the population, he did not have nearly enough of his own money to buy Harrods and he used the wealth of the Sultan of Brunei, one of the richest men in the world. It was the Sultan who provided the money for Harrods and Al Fayed also acted for him in the purchase of the prestigious London hotels, the Savoy and the Dorchester. Al Fayed may act the big tycoon, but in the biggest game he is a ‘gofer’ who takes orders and does as he’s told.


This is fascinating because we are led to believe that Mohamed Al Fayed and the Queen are on different sides and oppose each other over what happened to Diana. Funny, then, that Mohamed Al Fayed is subordinate to the Sultan of Brunei and the Queen of England is a friend of the Sultan of Brunei. She went to stay with him between September 16th and 20th in 1998.32 What is going on here? Al Fayed’s most prominent sycophantic media poodle is the Daily Mirror which has acted as his personal newsletter.


The Mirror made strenuous efforts to secure an interview with me in June 1998, despite my initial reluctance. But when I made my thoughts about Al Fayed known to the reporter, the article was dropped by the Editor, Piers Morgan, who personally conducts the Mirror interviews with Al Fayed.

Doing as you are told by the very rich and powerful and using highly unscrupulous business methods, has proved extremely profitable for Al Fayed. He owns a fleet of bullet proof Mercedes, a £3.5 million Sikorski helicopter, a £13 million Gulfstream Jet, a £15 million yacht, The Jonikal, castles and 50,000 acres in Scotland, and expensive homes in Gstaad, New York, Dubai, Geneva, Gerona, London, Surrey and Los Angeles, all fully staffed and equipped.33


Balnagown, his Scottish castle, is close to Loch Ness. As long as he does as he is told and is useful to the Brotherhood his wealth will continue. If he doesn’t - gone. They will hang him out to dry. Another source of income for the Fayeds, again interconnected with the Sultan of Brunei, is arms dealing. Al Fayed’s former brother-in-law and Dodi’s uncle, Adnan Khashoggi, the infamous Saudi arms dealer and fixer, has arranged weapons sales, legal and illegal, worth multibillions of dollars. Many of the discussions for such deals take place at the Ritz Hotel in Paris owned by Mohamed Al Fayed (or the Sultan?).


This is one reason why Al Fayed has the Ritz bugged to eavesdrop on his VIP guests. In fact, he has everything bugged, as we’ll see. He is deeply involved in brokering arms sales and Dodi was often an unofficial broker for arms-for-oil deals between the Gulf states and America.34 Adnan Khashoggi is a close associate of George Bush and bankrolled part of Bush’s ‘Iran-Contra’ arms-for-drugs operation in the 1980s.


George Bush, in turn, is a bosom buddy of the Queen and Prince Philip. Al Fayed is involved in many underground deals and plots involving events, people, and subjects that he is desperate to ensure remain secret. Certainly not a man to trust under any circumstances, in my view. I should emphasize, too, that the Islamic elite, like the Sultan of Brunei, are significant players in the Brotherhood pyramid and the Grand Lodge at Cairo is one of the most powerful secret society centres in the world.


This is hardly surprising given the Brotherhood’s obsession with ancient Egypt and it’s ritual and symbols. The reptilian bloodlines may be predominantly Aryan, but they are far from exclusively so. They work through streams within all races, the Arabs and the ‘Jews’ most certainly among them. One of the predominant secret societies in the Arab world is the Order of the Mystic Shrine or the ‘Shriners’.


They are connected to the Knights Templar, and the York and Scottish Rites of Freemasonry. Among their members in the United States have been President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and his successor President Harry S. Trueman. There is also a Prince Hall Shrine for black members of the Brotherhood, including that self-styled spokesman for the black community in the United States, Jesse Jackson.

Al Fayed has served the interests of the Brotherhood and the establishment in a number of ways while presenting an anti-establishment public profile. For instance it was he who exposed the two Conservative MPs, Neil Hamilton and Tim Smith, who were taking money to ask certain questions in the House of Commons. This is quite illegal. Al Fayed knew that this was true because he was the one giving them the money!


This story did enormous harm to the Conservative Government and did much to help the Brotherhood chosen one, Tony Blair, to a landslide victory for the Labour Party at the following General Election. Al Fayed has also escaped prosecution so far for a growing number of allegations from young female members of staff at Harrods that he sexually assaulted them. His obsession with sex is legendary. One girl, 17-yearold Samantha-Jane Ramsay, said that when she complained to her supervisor that she had been groped by Al Fayed, the supervisor sighed: “Another one”.


Al Fayed sacked her for making the complaint, as he does all those who speak out against his sexual molestation and style of business ‘management’. John Monks the general secretary of the Trades Union Congress, said that at Harrods there was “A regime of fear and terror”. When Samantha-Jane took her complaint to the local Marylebone Police Station, she said that the officer told her: “You’re not the first to come to us. We have files inches high on Mr Al Fayed, but no proof. It would be your word against his”.35 A file inches high of different girls making the same complaint about the same man would, I suggest, constitute rather more than “No proof”.


But Al Fayed, the man we are told the establishment would love to crush, survives untouched. So this is just some of the background to the liar, double-dealer, sexual molester, Satanist and Sultan of Brunei frontman, who had complete control of Diana’s security in the days and hours leading up to her death. I wouldn’t trust him with the security of my cat. Indeed, as Tom Bower has documented, Al Fayed has ordered his hit men to shoot a cat he didn’t like.

Al Fayed had become close to the Spencer family through Diana’s father, Earl ‘Johnny’ Spencer, and stepmother Raine. He helped ‘Johnny’ through financial difficulties and said he considered the Earl to be a brother.36 He had given Raine, whom Diana couldn’t stand, a place on the Harrods board.


Al Fayed sponsored prestigious royal events like the Royal Windsor Horse Show and polo competitions, but he especially backed the causes and charities supported by Diana. Bob Loftus, the head of security at Harrods between 1987 and 1996, told the British Channel Four programme, Dispatches, in June 1998, that he was ordered to tell Al Fayed immediately if Diana came into the store. Al Fayed would then go to the department where she was shopping and ‘accidentally’ meet her.


Every Christmas a green Harrods van would call at Diana’s home, Kensington Palace, with gifts for her and the boys from ‘Uncle Mohamed’. When you look at the evidence, he made it his business to court the friendship of the Princess of Wales in every way possible. On June 3rd 1997, he invited her to join him for a Summer holiday at his beach-side villa in San Tropez in the south of France.


On June 11th he got the breakthrough he had been working so hard for: she accepted. The following day he completed the purchase of a £15 million yacht, The Jonikal, through his Bermudan company Mohafa Shipping, and it was on this boat that Dodi and Diana’s romance was soon to blossom.

On July 11th Diana arrived in San Tropez with her sons, William and Harry, to stay in an eight-bedroomed luxury apartment on the ten acre Al Fayed estate on the exclusive Le Parc development. At this time, Dodi Fayed was still at his apartment in Paris with his fiancée Kelly Fisher, the American model. The 41-year-old Dodi was a ‘gofer’ for his father and lived on his father’s wealth, although he had enjoyed some success in the movie industry at one time as the hands-off producer of the hit British film Chariots Of Fire, again thanks to his father’s money.


He had a playboy reputation and was a very big spender, once famously running up a $100,000 bill in two months on his Amex card. He was dominated by his father and even in his film operation every decision had to be approved by Al Fayed. Dodi did whatever his father told him to do.


He had been engaged to Kelly Fisher for eight months and she was expecting to spend her holiday on The Jonikal. But on the evening of July 14th, Dodi took a phone call from his father who ordered him to go immediately to San Tropez to be with Diana. Kelly Fisher described what happened next in an interview with the Dispatches programme:

“(Dodi) said he was going to London and he’d be back and then we were going to San Tropez. That evening he didn’t call me and I finally got him on his portable phone. I said ‘Dodi where are you?’ and he said he was in London. I said ‘OK, I’ll call you right back at your apartment’. He said ‘No, no, don’t call me back.’ So I said ‘Dodi where are you?’ and he admitted he was in the South of France. His father had asked him to come down and not bring me, I know now.”

Two days later Dodi sent a private plane to fly Kelly to San Tropez. But while he stayed with Diana, Kelly was kept aboard another Fayed boat. “I’m sitting here stuck” she said. “So he had me in my little boat cage and he was, I know now, seducing Diana.” On July 31st, Diana returned to San Tropez for a second holiday with Dodi, this time alone. Kelly Fisher was back in Los Angeles preparing for her wedding to Dodi which she said was due to take place on August 9th. But two days before that, the story broke in the world media of the romance between Dodi and Diana.


Kelly heard from a friend who saw a picture in the paper. She recalls:

“I started calling him in London because at this time I was expecting his arrival in a day. I called his private line, but there was no answer. So then I called the secretary and asked to speak to him and she wouldn’t put me on. So Mohamed got on and in so many horrible words told me to never call back again. I said ‘He’s my fiancee, what are you talking about?’ He hung up on me and I called back and the secretary said don’t ever call here again, your calls are no longer to be put through. It was so horrible.”37

Ironically, Diana used to have Kensington Palace swept for listening devices and now she was in the clutches of a man for whom bugging was an obsession. The Al Fayed villa in San Tropez was bugged, as were all Fayed properties. Everything Diana said could be heard. Bob Loftus, the former Head of Security at Harrods, said that the bugging there was “A very extensive operation” and was also always under the direction of Al Fayed.38


Henry Porter, the London Editor of the magazine Vanity Fair, had spent two years investigating Al Fayed and he said they came across his almost obsessive use of eavesdropping devices to tape telephone calls, bug rooms, and film people. Through mutual friends, Porter warned Diana about Al Fayed’s background and activities “Because we thought this was quite dangerous for her for obvious reasons”39


But Diana apparently felt she could handle it and although she knew Al Fayed could “Sometimes be a rogue”, he was no threat to her, she thought. He is rather more than a rogue and rather more often than ‘sometimes’. She apparently told friends: “I know he’s naughty, but that’s all”. The Dispatches programme said they had written evidence that Al Fayed bugged the Ritz Hotel and given his background and the deals that are hatched at the Ritz, it would be staggering if he did not. Kelly Fisher said that the whole time she was in Fayed property she just assumed everything was bugged.


It was known, she said, and Dodi had told her everywhere was bugged. She went on: “As a matter of fact, when I confronted him about Diana, he said:

‘I can’t talk to you on the phone’. He said ‘I’ll talk to you in LA’. I knew what that meant”.

Diana was under the ‘protection’ of the Al Fayed security machine and even her most private conversations were being monitored.

Diana went with Dodi to Al Fayed’s Elizabethan-style mansion called Barrow Green Court at Oxted in Surrey, formerly owned by the Satanist Lord McAlpine. Throughout the house Al Fayed had placed statues of semi-naked Greek goddesses. On August 21st, despite Henry Porter’s warning, Diana returned again to San Tropez for another holiday with Dodi. Al Fayed was milking the situation, briefing journalists and photographers and enlisting the advice of publicist Max Clifford.40 The Al Fayed machine was leaking the couple’s whereabouts to ensure maximum publicity.


Al Fayed complained after the crash that photographers and journalists would not leave the Princess alone, a statement which, in the circumstances, beggars belief. The Diana-Dodi romance was now in full swing and Al Fayed was urging his son to intensify the relationship.41 And what Al Fayed said, Dodi did. Nothing was left to chance. Diana’s favourite music, the theme from The English Patient, was played over and over as the couple cruised on The Jonikal. Diana and Dodi had much in common. Both had been born into wealthy families and their fathers were distant figures. Both had experienced the breakdown of their parents’ marriages as their mothers left home.


They even attended finishing schools close to each other in Switzerland. But we should not rule out the possibility of mind manipulation techniques being used on both parties. I have met a number of former mind controlled slaves who were programmed to fall madly in love with someone they normally would not even like and there are endless examples of ‘love spells’ concocted by black magicians to cause someone to fall madly in love with them.


My scientist friend, Brian Desborough, tells me that the feeling of being in love is dependent upon the brain producing phenylethylamine. This is a chemical which also diminishes the ability to discriminate effectively, hence the term ‘love is blind’. Production of this chemical is sustained by the release of endorphins, a naturally occurring chemical linked to memory, learning, pain suppression, sex drive and hormone regulation. If these chemicals could be stimulated in both parties they would fall instantly in love.

I think there is a very good chance that something like this happened as the sting was set up for both of them. There was talk of engagement in the air, but it is impossible to say how imminent that was, because reports conflict. I have great doubts about that myself.

Diana and Dodi left the South of France from Olbia Airport at 1.3Opm on August 30th bound for Paris on Al Fayed’s Gulfstream jet. They apparently intended to stay one night at Dodi’s apartment, which looks out on the Arc de Triomphe, before going on to London where Diana was due to meet her sons. It was to be her last full day alive. The plane touched down at Le Bourget Airport in Paris at 3.2Opm and they were met by 20 or so celebrity photographers known as the paparazzi (from an Italian word meaning ‘buzzing insects’). A Mercedes was waiting for the party and a green Range Rover was to follow on behind.


This is normal security procedure and the very minimum you would expect to protect someone so globally famous. With Diana and Dodi in the Mercedes was Dodi’s bodyguard, Trevor Rees-Jones, the 29-year-old former member of the elite British military regiment, the Paras or Parachute Regiment. Along with the SAS, the Paras are the most highly trained (and therefore mind controlled) regiment in the British forces. In the Range Rover were the driver, Henri Paul, the acting Head of Security at the Ritz, and another bodyguard, Kes Wingfield. They drove from the airport to the Villa Windsor on the Bois de Boulogne, the former home of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor.


The Duke and Duchess lived there after the duke, as King Edward VIII, abdicated the British throne when the government and establishment would not accept his marriage to the America divorcee, Wallis Simpson. They then moved to Paris as the Duke and Duchess of Windsor. Their house is now owned by Mohamed Al Fayed and it is said that he was going to give it to Dodi and Diana as a wedding present.


This talk of a wedding, however, is unsubstantiated, much as Al Fayed has sought to promote it. His publicity machine led the public to believe the couple had spent time at Villa Windsor discussing decor, but the bodyguard Kes Wingfield said that they only stayed there for “Around ten minutes”.42 From here they were driven to the Ritz Hotel where they arrived at 4.20pm.

The Ritz is in the Place Vendome and all around that square at first floor level are symbols of the Sun and the cross, very much like the symbols used by the ancients to symbolise the ‘journey’ of the Sun through the year which I featured earlier in the book. This was the symbol of King Louis XIV, who was known as the ‘Sun King’. At his palace at Versailles in the 17th century he decorated rooms in honour of Apollo, the Sun god, and Diana, the goddess of the Moon.


There was also a statue of the goddess Diana at Versailles. In the centre of the Vendome Square is an immense pillar with a statue of Napoleon on the top and it mirrors the famous Nelson’s Column in Trafalgar Square, London. At this stage Diana still had the same level of security that she’d had since the airport, but this could have been increased considerably if support from the French High Protection Police Security Service (SPHP) had been requested. It is there to protect VIPs visiting the city, but a request for their services must be made. It wasn’t.


All Diana’s security was provided by Al Fayed’s people from start to finish. If they had enlisted the protection of the French police, Diana would still be alive. When a celebrity like Madonna visits Paris, the French Police have one car in front of hers and another behind, together with two motorcycle riders front and back of the motorcade. The cars are driven by trained drivers and they carry armed security men. According to reports, the SPHP made three, possibly four, offers to protect Diana, but each one was refused by Dodi. Was he, himself, under instruction to reject these offers from someone to whom he could not say no? An officer of the SPHP told Dodi: “If you will not use our car, we recommend that two police cars accompany you on your excursions around the city.”43 This advice, too, was ignored.

Diana and Dodi went straight to the $6,000 a night 18th century Imperial Suite at the Ritz. From there, Diana rang her friend, the Daily Mail journalist Richard Kay. She told him she intended to retire from public life in November and he said that he had never heard her so happy. The couple booked a table at the Chez Benoit restaurant for 8.45pm and they intended to spend the night at Dodi’s apartment.

Figure 52:

The journey to Dodi’s apartment in the early evening of August 30th.

A straightforward journey with no need to go through the Pont de L’Alma tunnel.

At 6.30pm Dodi went across the Place Vendome to a jewellers, Repossi, to buy a diamond ring for Diana which was later delivered to the Ritz. A little after 7 pm, the couple were driven in the Mercedes along the Champs Elysees to Dodi’s apartment on Rue Arsene-Houssaye close to the Arc de Triomphe. Here they unpacked and prepared for dinner. Again the back up Range Rover was there and so was another car carrying bodyguards for added protection. Why was this level of security thought necessary in the early evening, but not in the early hours of the morning at the time of the crash? Dodi’s apartment is known as the ‘Etoile flat’ after the Place de L’Etoile, the ‘Sun or star circle’ road around the Arc de Triomphe.


The route they took to the apartment was out of the Place Vendome onto the Rue de Rivoli, and half way around the Place de la Concorde they turned right onto the Champs Elysees and drove straight up that famous avenue to Dodi’s apartment (see Figure 52). Remember that route, it is crucially important. As they arrived at the apartment at 7.1 5pm, bodyguards were seen to rush from their car to hold back six paparazzi. Diana and Dodi became concerned about eating at the unprotected Chez Benoit restaurant and decided to head back to the Ritz to eat.


They took the same route back, down the Champs Elysees and around the Place de la Concorde. The couple, with bodyguards Wingfield and Rees-Jones, walked into the Ritz, captured by the now famous video pictures, at 9.47pm. As the paparazzi gather in numbers outside, amid rumours of an engagement announcement, Diana has already started the last three hours of her life. Who was feeding the rumours and the whereabouts of Diana during the day to create the paparazzi stampede that dominated Diana and Dodi’s movements and decisions that night? I think I can guess, somehow. Al Fayed.

And who were some of these ‘paparazzi’ making life uncomfortable for Diana, thus changing the plans for the evening? The Ritz security video also identified a number of people who had been outside among the onlookers for most of the day and were still there on the edge of the crowd.44

Now the plot seriously thickens. After speaking on the phone with his father at his estate in Oxted, Surrey, Dodi Fayed announced a quite ludicrous plan. To avoid the paparazzi, the Mercedes which had been transporting them all day together with the back up Range Rover were to be taken around the front of the hotel and used as a decoy for the paparazzi. At the same time another Mercedes would be brought around to the back entrance of the hotel to whisk the couple away to the apartment on the Champs Elysees.


Henri Paul, the 41-year-old acting head of security at the Ritz, was called on his mobile phone by Dodi and told to report back to the hotel. He went off duty at 7pm and by the time he returned it was 10pm. No-one has established where Paul was in those three hours. Dodi said that his father, Mohamed Al Fayed, had personally authorized that Henri Paul should drive the Mercedes. For me, that is Dodi-speak for “My father told me this is how it is going to be”. Henri Paul was not a qualified chauffeur and had no hire car permit. L. Fletcher Prouty, a former colonel in the US Airforce who worked closely with the intelligence agencies, once said:

“No-one has to direct an assassination -it happens. The active role is played secretly by permitting it to happen. This is the greatest single clue. Who has the power to call off or reduce the usual security precautions?”45

Absolutely right. If we apply Prouty’s rule to Diana and ask who had the power and used that power - to reduce the usual security precautions for her that night, we have a rather interesting answer: Mohamed Al Fayed. Given these circumstances he must answer the obvious question: Why was this security reduced?


When President Kennedy was assassinated, there were no bodyguards standing on his car while four were standing on the one immediately behind (see picture section). He was also in an open-topped car at a dangerous time in a dangerous city. When Martin Luther King was shot dead at the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee, on April 4th, 1968, the black police officer in charge of security for King was sent home against his will hours before the shooting. The only two black firemen at the station next to the motel were sent to other stations just for that day.


The scapegoat for this assassination was a guy called James Earl Ray. Not even King’s family believed he was responsible. So much so that they attended his funeral a few years ago. When Bobby Kennedy was murdered after making a speech at the Ambassadors Hotel in Los Angeles on June 4th 1968, again the security arrangements were tampered with. The plan was for Kennedy to walk off the stage and through the crowd to the exit. But immediately after the speech, Kennedy’s ‘aides’, especially Frank Mankiewicz, insisted that it was safer for him to go out through the hotel kitchen.


When he walked into the kitchen he was met by the mind controlled Sirhan Sirhan with a gun in his hand. It is far more likely that Bobby Kennedy was actually shot by members of his ‘security’ team, particularly Thane Eugene Caesar, the ‘security guard’ who was employed at the last minute and had endless connections into far right groups and the intelligence community. But with Sirhan Sirhan at the scene with a gun, they had a mind controlled scapegoat to take the rap and that was all they needed.


Sirhan Sirhan had been on a ‘mind expansion’ course with the Rosicrucians in the weeks before he was implicated in Kennedy’s death (see .. .And The Truth Shall Set You Free). Frank Mankiewicz, who guided Kennedy to the kitchen, was a former public relations man for the Mossad-front in America, the Anti Defamation League. He turned up later as head of publicity for the Oliver Stone film, JFK, which claimed to be an expose of the assassination of President Kennedy. It wasn’t. When the Israeli Prime Minister, Zitzhak Rabin, was shot dead by an assassin in Tel Aviv in 1995, an extraordinary video taken by an onlooker showed how Rabin’s security detail stepped back in unison to leave the assassin alone and free to kill his target.


You can see the pattern. And what happened in the crucial last minutes of Diana’s life? They withdrew her security on the orders of Mohamed Al Fayed via his son. That is a fact. All day she had travelled in the same Mercedes with the Range Rover as a back up vehicle. Now she would transfer to another Mercedes with no back up support whatsoever. This was an extraordinary decision for a man obsessed with his own security. Bob Loftus, the former Head of Security at Harrods, said:

“Compared with the protection that Al Fayed affords himself, which is very professional, of a very high standard, that which was afforded to the mother of the future King of England was a Mickey Mouse operation.”46

He added that “Al Fayed was absolutely paranoid about his personal protection”. Just for him to walk around his own store, there would be three or four plain clothes members of his personal protection team who travelled with him all the time, plus another four uniformed security who would act almost as ‘outriders’ to create two rings of security around him. That’s in his own store! But is it paranoia, or the knowledge of the seedy, cesspit, world of arms dealers and Brotherhood fixers of many kinds, in which Al Fayed constantly operates?


People who think nothing of the mass murder of children, let alone the assassination of a wealthy ‘yes’ man like him. Dodi Fayed was obsessed with his security for the same reason. A lot of this security was also inspired by the size of Al Fayed’s ego, to be fair. Mostly he recruited his body guards from the SAS and the Parachute Regiment and used the Brotherhood operation, Control Risks, to make recommendations. Tom Bower tells in his book about Al Fayed of how armed guards at the Oxted estate hide behind bushes wearing full combat uniform and blacked out faces.


Whenever Al Fayed travelled in his Mercedes there was always a back up Range Rover carrying emergency medical equipment and security staff, but now he withdrew that protection from Diana. More than that, a new car was introduced for her, another Mercedes was sent to the rear entrance of the Ritz, supplied by a car hire company called Etoile Limousines, the same name as Dodi’s flat. Etoile Limousines is based at the Ritz and depends for its entire income on contracts with the hotel and its guests. In other words, it is controlled completely by Mohamed Al Fayed and whoever controls him. The new Mercedes was an S-280, lighter in weight than the 600 series they had used all day and without the dark tinted windows. Other cars were available, but this one was chosen instead.


A director of Etoile, Niels Siegel, told the inquiry into Diana’s death that he delivered the car to the rear entrance of the Ritz, but the Dispatches programme showed that this is a lie. It was delivered by a driver called Frederic Lucard and he can be seen doing so on the security video. Lucard said he found it very strange that Etoile would allow Henri Paul, a man not qualified as a chauffeur, to drive one of their cars. So why did they do it? Because Mohamed Al Fayed told them to, that’s why. Brian Dodd, the former Head of Security for Al Fayed in the 1980s, gave his assessment of the situation to Dispatches:
“It’s a new car that’s come into the system.


They wouldn’t have had time to check that car out. It should have been checked out. There could have been a bomb on the car, for instance. It was a most stupid plan. It shouldn’t even have been considered. The back up vehicle is there, not just to avert the paparazzi, but for instance, a motor cyclist with a pillion rider to pull up and shoot, or put a magnetised bomb on top of the car. That’s why the back up car is there - to stop any of that. Why they never had a back up car, God only knows. (I think I can offer a good guess without the need for Divine inspiration.)

“I had probably six or eight men I would consider professional bodyguards who I would have had on that job and Trevor Rees-Jones and Kes Wingfield, after what I have seen happened, would not have been in Paris that night.”

The Mercedes with Henry Paul at the wheel sped off from the rear entrance of the Ritz at 12.20am with Paul telling the paparazzi not to bother following because they would never catch him. Diana and Dodi were in the back seat and in the front was Trevor Rees-Jones, the former ‘Para’ with the reputation for being ‘fearless’. Rees-Jones says he disagreed with the change of plan. He was not wearing a seat belt which is normal practice because body guards need to be free to react quickly. The car was driven at speed down the Rue Cambon and turned right down the Rue de Rivoli into the Place de la Concorde where it stopped briefly at the lights.


The paparazzi photographer, Romuald Rat, on the back of a motor cycle, drew up alongside them here, but he says that Henri Paul jumped the lights on red and headed onto the dual carriageway alongside the River Seine called the Cours la Reine. The car plunged down into one tunnel, came back to the surface, and almost immediately went down into the very short tunnel at the Pont de UAlma. Here it went out of control and struck the 13th pillar in the centre of the tunnel which is lined with concrete pillars unprotected by crash barriers.


Henri Paul and Dodi Fayed died immediately. According to the autopsy report Diana was clinically dead within 20 minutes and this was long before she arrived at hospital. Trevor Rees-Jones survived the crash because he was wearing a seat belt and Diana and Dodi were not. This could be highly significant. Rees-Jones was not wearing a belt when they left the Ritz in accordance with normal practice for body guards, and when Romuald Rat took a photograph at the lights at the Place de la Concorde, Rees-Jones still did not have a seat belt on. But little more than a minute later when the car struck the pillar, he was wearing a seat belt. Why? If he donned the belt because for some reason he sensed danger, why did he not scream at Diana and Dodi to put their seat belts on?


After all it only takes a second and the whole reason he was in the car was to protect them. Rees-Jones has some serious questions to answer here and he is giving no answers. Some bodyguards do put a seat belt on when the car is on a fast road, but Rees-Jones is not saying this. He says he doesn’t know why he strapped himself in. And if they were going to Dodi’s flat, they would have been on the fast road for about a minute. All he says is that he remembers they were followed by two cars, one of them white, and a motorcycle, which is in keeping with the smokescreen story. But one simple fact about the crash has been missed by all the newspaper articles, magazine features, television documentaries and discussions I have seen, and by all but a few researchers.


Everyone is agreed that the couple were being driven back to Dodi’s flat near the Arc de Triomphe when the crash happened. Well there is one glaring problem with that: The Pont de L’Alma tunnel is not on the way to Dodi’s flat.

It takes you away from that area.

I have been to Paris and walked the route the car took that night, in fact I have walked extensively around that whole area, and the route to Dodi’s apartment is the same as the one they took earlier that night. You go to the Place de la Concorde and, half way around, you turn right into the Champs Elysees and drive straight up to Dodi’s flat on the right near the Arc de Triomphe (see Figure 53 overleaf). At that time of night it would take only a few minutes. But Henri Paul did not do that.


He drove past the turning for the Champs Elysees, jumped the lights on red and sped down the duel carriageway to the Pont de L’Alma. This took them AWAY from Dodi’s flat. I have heard it said that Paul was going a long way round to avoid the photographers and traffic, but the photographers would have been waiting at the flat anyway by the time they got there. What is most important to stress here is that Henri Paul’s route was not the direct one to Dodi’s apartment, but it did ensure that it took them through the Pont de UAlma Tunnel, the significance of which is fantastic, as you will soon appreciate.


Interestingly, it was after Paul went past the turning to Les Champs Elysees and headed towards the Pont de L’Alma that Rees-Jones put his seat belt on. He says he can’t remember why, but I can help him there. There can only be two reasons for this. Either he knew what was coming or he realised when Henri Paul screamed off from the lights that something was seriously wrong and he put the seat belt on to protect himself. But again if that is the case, why did he not tell Dodi and Diana to do the same? And if Rees-Jones had realised a potential danger, why had Dodi and Diana not seen it and taken the appropriate action to protect themselves? I’m sorry if that upsets Rees-Jones’ family, but given the circumstances these are questions that need to be asked.

Figure 53:

The change of route which cost Diana her life. Instead of going directly to Dodi’s apartment,

Henri Paul sped off in another direction away from their destination.

It is said that he was taking the long way round to avoid the paparazzi,

but what an amazing ‘coincidence’ that this took the car into the Pont de L ‘Alma tunnel,

one of the Babylonian Brotherhood’s most sacred sites for the goddess Diana!

Once the deed was done; the scapegoat was produced. The methods are so predictable, but they keep working so why change them? The Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan and James Earl Ray of the Diana assassination was the driver, Henri Paul. Once the paparazzi card had been played and focused public and media attention in the days after the crash, it was announced that Paul was three to four times over the French drink driving limit and that his blood contained traces of antidepressant drugs, including Fluoxetine, the active ingredient of the infamous Prozac. “The cause of the crash was simple,” we were told. “The driver was drunk.”

Tampering with blood samples or creating alcohol in the blood is child’s play and so is the insertion of tiny ‘balloons’ which release alcohol into the blood stream in stages. There was certainly no sign before he drove away from the Ritz that he was intoxicated to the extent, according to his blood tests, that he must have drunk the equivalent of eight Scotches on an empty stomach. A behavioural psychologist on the Independent Television documentary, Diana - Secrets Of The Crash, could find no evidence that he was drunk after studying the Ritz videos of him that night, but there could be an explanation for this which I will come to shortly.


Only two days earlier, Paul had undergone a rigorous medical for the renewal of his pilot’s licence and there was no sign of the alcohol abuse the post-crash propaganda claimed. Quite the opposite. And there was another strange anomaly revealed by the ITV documentary in 1998. The Haemoglobin in Henri Paul’s blood was found to contain 20.7% carbon monoxide and this would have been at a much higher level earlier because the carbon monoxide content halves every four to five hours once exposure to it has stopped. Haemoglobin carries the oxygen.


Debbie Davis of the Carbon Monoxide Support Group said that with these levels in his blood, Henri Paul would not have known his left hand from his right, because of the reduced oxygen reaching the brain. Dr Alastair Hay, an expert on carbon monoxide poisoning, agreed and could not explain why Paul showed no signs of the considerable symptoms that should have been evident:

“I find it difficult to rationalize everything. A blood-carbon monoxide level of 20% and (a high blood-alcohol level) suggests this would be someone with a much slower reaction time, certainly be someone who would be slowed up in the way he did things, would probably also be somebody who was in some pain, but none of those things appear to be evident from the pictures that we see of him. It is a bit of an enigma.”47

There is a lot more to know about Henri Paul. His best friend, Claude Garrec, told the ITV documentary that Paul had contacts within the French and foreign intelligence services and maintained them throughout his time at the Ritz. This is no surprise because the intelligence agencies recruit the security men at the top hotels and the Ritz, with its VIP clientele and reputation for espionage and arms dealing, would have been a prime target. Paul certainly had unexplained sources of income.


He earned about £2025,000 a year at the Ritz and yet he was a keen pilot with 605 hours of flying time at about £300 an hour. He had a string of bank accounts. There were two in a bank outside Paris and three accounts, plus a safe deposit box, at the Banque Nationale de Paris near the Ritz. He had three accounts at the nearby branch of Barclays and one current and four deposit accounts at the Caisse D’Epargne de Paris. In the eight months before the crash, sums of £4,000 were paid into an account here on five separate occasions. In total he had £122,000 (1.2 million francs) and no-one knows where it came from. Then there is the question of where Paul was in the three hours between 7pm when he went off duty and 10pm when Dodi called him on his mobile phone and told him to return to the Ritz. His whereabouts in this period are a mystery. A very significant one.

To understand how the Brotherhood operates requires immensely detailed research over a vast array of interconnecting subjects. Everything from ancient history, to Satanic symbolism and ritual, the Earth’s magnetic grid, the power of the Sun, the banking system, and mind control. The journalists who have produced the articles and documentaries about the crash came to the subject cold and they can never uncover the truth because they don’t understand what they are dealing with.


Their vision of possibility is limited by their indoctrinated view of reality. They can’t see, for instance, that there are organisations within organisations which means that one force can work through apparently unconnected agencies like British and French Intelligence, the Paris police and medical services, and the inquiry investigating the cause of the crash. I mean, you don’t have to search far for evidence of that.


Look at the Kennedy assassination for one. It is this lack of research of the big picture that leads reporters like Martyn Gregory on the Dispatches programme to state categorically that “there is not a shred of credible evidence to support the conspiracy theory” and that the suggestion of Prince Philip’s involvement was “ludicrous”. I wonder after reading the evidence so far -and there is a great deal more to come - which you think is more ludicrous: the idea of a plot to kill Diana or Martyn Gregory’s statement?


It was an unfortunate comment in a programme that produced some good information about Al Fayed. Then there was the ‘investigation’ into the crash by John Stalker, the former deputy chief constable of Greater Manchester, in the News Of The World newspaper, in which he dismissed all idea that Diana was murdered. Ironically, Stalker claimed, quite rightly, that he was the victim of a conspiracy to remove him from the police force after he identified a policy by the Northern Ireland police, the RUC, to shoot people they believed were terrorists and ask the questions later.


This was the so-called shoot-to-kill policy. Pushing aside every suggestion of a conspiracy to kill Diana, Stalker asked: “Why would the French want to cover up the murder of an English woman?”48


The naivety of that statement is so breathtaking, I need a glass of water. At the same time, Stalker did ask some pertinent questions about the crash and its aftermath: “Why was the Fayed security around the princess reduced to one wholly inadequate man with no back up? Why did the police not appeal for help from the public? Why was there no post mortem-autopsy on Dodi Fayed’s body?” Answers: because of the very conspiracy you dismiss, Mr Stalker.

One of the most important subjects to research if we are to understand how Diana was killed, is the power and potential of mind control. I’ll give some examples. In the 1980s the best part of 30 scientists working in top secret projects, mostly computer programmers, died in very strange and unexplained circumstances. Marconi was the major company involved, but there were others like Plessey and British Aerospace.


In 1986, Vimal Dajibhai, who was working for Marconi Underwater Systems, drove from London to Bristol, a city with which he had no connection, and threw himself off the famous suspension bridge there. A few months before, Arshad Sharif, a computer programmer with Marconi Defence Systems, also drove from London to Bristol and hanged himself. Why Bristol? It is a former Knights Templar port and its name has evolved from Barati, the Phoenician goddess. It just so happens that an elite unit of British Intelligence called the Committee of 26 is based there and they use the runway at the British Aerospace complex to fly British and foreign agents in and out of the country.


I was called once, from what sounded like a plane, by a guy claiming to represent the CIA. He said he was flying into the British Aerospace runway to sort me out. “The Company (CIA) are not happy,” he said. Oh, I thought, I am sorry, I do hope they cheer up soon. I drove over to meet him just to check it out, but he didn’t show. He was probably a guy who needed help, or perhaps they were seeing how I would react to threats. Either way, they got the airport right. In that period in the 1980s, not only in Bristol, there were strange deaths galore of people at the cutting edge of development in the ‘defence’ industries.

What possesses a man to get into his car, drive more than two hours to the Bristol Suspension Bridge, and jump off? This may seem a long way from the Diana assassination, but it’s not. I’m talking about mind control. A CIA scientist told me that he was put through forms of mind control to stop him recalling his knowledge once a project was completed. I’ll give you an example of mind control in a situation very similar to the one in Paris.


David Sands was a highly skilled scientist working in a very sensitive area of defence, but at 37 he was talking about leaving the industry and changing his lifestyle. He was happily married with two small children, a son aged six and a three year old daughter. Sands and his wife had just returned from an enjoyable holiday in Venice when he died in mysterious circumstances. Although they are not so mysterious if you understand mind control. He worked for Easams who, in turn, were operating contracts for the Ministry of Defence. It appears that while Sands and his wife were in Venice, the company was visited by members of the elite British police unit, the Special Branch.


Then, on Saturday, March 28th 1987, David Sands told his wife he was going out to refuel the car, but he didn’t return for six hours. No-one has any idea where he was, but I think I do. His wife, Anna, called the police and constable John Hiscock was at the house when Sands returned at 10.2Opm. Asked the obvious question:

“Where have you been?”, he said that he had been driving and thinking.

His wife said that it was out of character for him to be away for so long and she didn’t think he realised how long he had been out. He seemed confused, but happy, she said. Two days later, on Monday, March 30th, he climbed into his excellently maintained Austin Maestro and began his regular journey from his home in Itchen Abbas, near Winchester, to Easams at Camberley in Surrey. His wife said there was nothing unusual about his demeanour or behaviour and driving conditions were good.


But about 30 minutes into the journey when David Sands was driving along the A33 at Popham, near Basingstoke, he suddenly did a U-turn across the duel carriageway and headed at high speed in the opposite direction to his destination. Turning onto a slip road at about 80 miles an hour, Sands then drove his car straight into a disused cafe building killing himself in an explosion of flame. There were no skid marks. He had not even tried to stop.49


It is so clear that during the time he was missing, his mind was being programmed and all it took was a trigger word, sign, sound or action, and the programming was activated. At that point he would have switched from his normal self to a man focused only on driving into the cafe building and blowing himself away. The subconscious programming overpowers the conscious mind and robot replaces human.

That, I am convinced, is what also happened to Henri Paul in Paris. Sands went missing for six hours before he drove into the cafe. Paul went missing for three hours before he drove into the 13th pillar in the Pont de UAlma tunnel. This is what I suggest happened in Paris. The Brotherhood networks were working through many people and agencies to ensure that Diana was in Paris that night because, at its foundation, the plan was to perform a specific Satanic ritual and the timing, circumstances and the place of death had to be arranged in intricate detail.


Diana was under Al Fayed’s security web for much of the time leading up to the crash and all of the time in those last few days. Her conversations were heard and monitored throughout by the Al Fayed bugging system. During his missing hours, Henri Paul, the asset of French and British Intelligence, was being programmed for his role, or perhaps the final touches were being put to programming already installed. Diana’s ritual death was arranged from the very top of the Brotherhood and, by comparison, people like Al Fayed are small and powerless nonentities, pawns in the game they probably do not fully understand.


The Mercedes which was brought to the rear entrance of the Ritz had been stolen some weeks earlier - before the Diana-Dodi relationship began - and when it was recovered it underwent extensive repairs. It had been standing outside the exclusive Taillevent restaurant when the driver’s door was flung open and the chauffeur pulled out by three Arabic-speaking men with hand guns. The vehicle was missing for two weeks and when it was found the wheels were missing, the door ripped off, and the electronic system and equipment controlling the braking system had gone. Al Fayed, as we have seen, controlled the company, Etoile Limousines, which supplied the vehicle. No wonder the French authorities turned down the offer by experts from Mercedes to examine the car after the crash.

When Henri Paul came back on duty that night he seemed his normal self to most observers. The programming was deep within his psyche still waiting to be activated. He may well have had a couple of alcoholic drinks in the Ritz bar, but his intake and demeanour did not correspond with the later medical report. Claims that he was an alcoholic also do not match with the examination of his liver.


But if, as I suggest, Henri Paul was a mind controlled ‘multiple’ he could have been drunk in one compartment of his mind and not in another. I have heard from recovering ‘multiples’ who have experienced this. Someone close to Paul that night, his handler, was switching his compartments. In this way he could have had a considerable level of alcohol in his blood while, in some compartments, he would have been unaffected by it. The same with the carbon monoxide. Just before or just after the Mercedes pulled away from the Ritz, Henri Paul was given the trigger which activated the programming. It could have been a sound, a sign, a colour or more likely a word or sentence.


With Paul’s subconscious programming now overwhelming his conscious mind, he sped away to the Place de la Concorde and down the dual carriageway to the Pont de UAlma. Rees-Jones put his seat belt on, but apparently did not alert Diana and Dodi to the danger. Thus they stay unbelted. As Paul entered the Pont d L’Alma tunnel at an estimated 80 miles an hour (some reports say slower), he braked fiercely, scraped the right hand wall of the tunnel, and then aimed the car at the 13th pillar. It is the 13th pillar that gives it away.


The Brotherhood throughout history has had such an obsession with the number 13 that to believe this was a coincidence is taking chance to the level of fantasy. There must be 30 pillars in that tunnel and the car hit the 13th because it was meant to. Diana had an aversion to the number 13 and she would not allow a 13th lot in her dress auction at Christies the June before she died. If, as some witnesses have suggested, the crash was caused by the Mercedes hitting a white Fiat Uno or by a motorcyclist flashing a powerful light into Paul’s eyes from a motor cycle, there is no way he could be sure of hitting the 13th pillar.


But a person with a deeply programmed subconscious would be able to put the car right on the button, even at speed.

Mark Phillips is the man who helped to deprogramme Cathy O’Brien when she was a mind controlled slave of the CIA. He has worked in these fields for much of his adult life and after I reached my conclusions about the events in Paris, I rang him to ask if it would be possible to mind control Henri Paul to pick out that pillar at speed. Mark was in no doubt: “Yes, Yes” he said “More than yes, absolutely yes”.


He pointed out that the subconscious worked much faster than the conscious mind and to the subconscious 80 miles an hour would actually be quite slow compared with its ability to think and react. If the speed was considerably slower as some reports suggest, it would have been even easier.

“There are many techniques they could have used to programme his mind during those three hours he was missing”, Mark said.

The number of ways they could have caused the crash, another vehicle, an explosive device, stun weapons, etc, etc, would fill a book and any of them is possible on the face of it. But not if they wanted to be sure of hitting the 13th pillar, which they did. To do that, they needed a driver with a programmed subconscious.

I think the stories about the mysterious Fiat Uno and the motorcyclist with the flashing light are diversions to lead researchers away from the simple truth. So much time and effort has been wasted on the Fiat in particular, fueled by Al Fayed’s own investigation team. Whenever such assassinations are staged, there are always a stream of false ‘clues’ and ‘leads’ which divert attention. The Kennedy assassination was full of them.


Another possibility for the cause of the crash is external control of the car. Randulph Fiennes, famous for his polar expeditions, was an officer in the Royal Scots Greys and attached to the elite SAS. He wrote a book about a secret group of assassins called the Clinic and how they murdered people while making it look like an accident. The death of Major Michael Marman is particularly relevant to what could have happened in Paris. He was driving a Citroen 2CV along the A303 near Stonehenge in November 1986 when a BMW coming the other way careered across the carriageway and killed him instantly.


Fiennes says that the BMW had been tampered with and the braking system was operated by remote control which could override the normal system via compressed air from a tiny scuba diving cylinder hidden in the engine compartment. The remote control equipment was operated from a Volvo which followed the BMW, Fiennes reported. The BMW was driven by Sir Peter Horsley, a retired Air Marshall, who survived the crash.


Fiennes says that the Clinic knew that Horsley would be travelling along that road at the same time as their target. In his autobiography, Sounds From Another Room, Horsley says that he was accelerating to about 60 miles an hour when the car began to react strangely. He saw a grey Volvo closing up quickly behind him and as he was about to wave it past, his BMW spun sharply to the left, the brakes screeching, and then sharply to the right and back again. This is remarkably similar to what happened to the Mercedes before it struck the 13th pillar.

Horsley was by now desperately trying to maintain control and he went on:

“Out of the corner of my eye I saw the grey Volvo accelerating past me at high speed. My car had now developed a mind of its own as it swung broadside and skidded down the road. With a lurch it hit the central reservation, mounted the grass verge separating the two lanes of the highway and crossed over into the opposite carriageway. I had just time to see a small car approaching from the opposite direction. I hit it sideways on with tremendous force. In a split-second the driver’s horror-stricken face was visible and I heard his hoarse scream.”50

It is possible that Diana’s Mercedes was externally controlled in this way, because it is clear that the steering on Horsley’s BMW was also remotely controlled. Certainly a highly skilled operator could direct the Mercedes into the 13th pillar. Support for the contention that no other car was directly involved in Diana’s crash comes from Eric Petel who claims to have seen the crash. Petel says that he was riding his motorcycle towards the entrance to the tunnel when he was overtaken by the Mercedes. No other vehicle was nearby. He said:

“I saw a car in my rear-view mirrors flashing its headlamps. I moved across to let it by and it raced past even though I was doing about 70 miles per hour. An instant later I heard a deafening noise and saw the accident. The car was spinning in the road... I stopped. There were no other cars or bikes around at all and I could see all the way through the tunnel.

The roof of the Mercedes was totally smashed in. The right hand rear door was partly open and I looked in and saw a woman. She seemed to have been thrown forward from the back seat and had her head between the front seats.”51

Petel said blood was flowing from her right ear and as he brushed her hair from her face and placed her head on the arm rest, he realized it was Princess Diana. Her eyelashes were fluttering, but she had not opened her eyes at this stage, he said. Petel estimates he was at the scene for about a minute before climbing back on his bike to ring the police. He told them that Diana had been in an accident, but they laughed and told him to stop wasting their time. In despair at this, he rode to the police station in Avenue Mozart.


His lawyer, Antoine Deguines, says that Petel was kept waiting for 25 minutes and taken into a backroom where he was handcuffed. For reporting an ‘accident’? When eventually freed, he was told to follow a police car to another police station where he gave a statement which he signed without reading. “I was outraged” he said “They didn’t seem to care about the crash.” He heard nothing from the authorities for months before he enlisted help from a lawyer to tell his story to the official inquiry.

Whenever an assassination occurs in a public place, two things happen. The person named as responsible is a ‘patsy’ or ‘scapegoat’, most often these days under mind control, and diversions galore are created to lead investigators away from the truth of what happened. The first method allows you to make an immediate arrest, or expose the person to blame, and no further investigations are necessary because everyone knows who was responsible. We have seen this technique with Lee Harvey Oswald, Sirhan Sirhan, Timothy McVeigh, and now Henri Paul. It is endless.


The second method, the diversion, ensures that the crucial hours and days after the event are wasted as people chase a mass of false stories and ‘leads’ .This was a technique used in Paris with the paparazzi, the flashing lights from motorcycles and later the Fiat Uno. Also when people are fed a constant barrage of conflicting reports and theories they become confused and a confused mind switches off and loses interest. So first they tell you the paparazzi were to blame, then they were not. Then they tell you the car speedometer was found stuck at 120 miles an hour, then they say it was found on zero.

I thought it strange how many American witnesses to the crash were quickly located.

The Pont and Place de L’Alma were not, before Diana’s death, a popular tourist area.

There is nothing there except a restaurant or two, a tunnel, and a maze of crossing roads. And yet at 12.25 in the morning, several American tourists say they witnessed what happened. The number of witnesses in general was unusual anyway, given the late hour and the fact that Paris empties at that time of year as vast numbers of Parisians take their annual holiday to the French coastal resorts.


I can understand that some people in the few cars travelling along the road at the time may have seen the crash and its immediate aftermath, but I know from visiting the spot myself, that the main pedestrian routes have virtually no view of the tunnel at all. The police failed to control the crash scene according to normal police procedure and so much evidence was lost immediately. They failed to question important witnesses and leaked some information while maintaining unshakable secrecy over other areas of the investigation.52 It all stinks.

Today there is an added challenge for would-be assassins and assassination plots with the ‘traffic’ cameras that are located all over cities. Smile, you’re on TV. It would be impossible to keep secret the methods and personnel used to kill Diana if the whole thing was being videoed. But when you are the Brotherhood with connections at the highest levels in politics, police and intelligence agencies, the traffic cameras present no such problem. You simply switch them off!


There are 17 traffic cameras on the route between the Ritz and the Pont de L’Alma, including those inside the tunnel itself. If they had been working that night there would be no mystery, because you could play back the whole event on your television set. One camera looks down on the entrance to the tunnel and would have recorded any Fiat Uno or men on motorbikes with flashing lights. But that camera, like all the others, was switched off at the crucial moment. Never before in Paris had the whole system malfunctioned at the same time and the police refuse to explain what happened. The system runs on an independent power supply and it is controlled by the police and, ultimately, by the French Intelligence agencies, because the cameras are there to monitor far more than just traffic problems.


At the same time as the camera system failed all the police communication frequencies in central Paris also went off. Simon Reagan in his excellent book, who Killed Diana?, quotes a contact called Andre’ who, like many people, loves to listen in to police radio messages. Andre’ was sitting on a bench near the Eiffel Tower, a few minutes walk from the Pont de L’Alma, on the night Diana died. He was, as usual, using a receiver to monitor the police communications.


But suddenly, at 12.2Oam, all the lines went down. There was a radio blackout. It lasted for 20 minutes and then, Andre’ said, the signal came back and there was a mass of radio traffic as people all wanted to talk at once. “I have never... come across such chaotic radio traffic”, he said. “It was extraordinary.”

When the lines went down Diana was leaving the Ritz on her last journey alive. By the time they came back she was lying in the tunnel under the complete control of the emergency team and according to the autopsy report within a few minutes of clinical death. And there is not a shred of credible evidence for a conspiracy, is there, eh? My God, it’s in our face. But within ten days of the crash, the French police had produced a 350 page preliminary report which assumed it was an accident and they did not consider any other possibility.

Now, talking of that ‘emergency team’ brings me to another vital point. As a contact on the fringes of British Intelligence told me, causing the crash is easy for the powers involved, but you cannot be sure of killing your target. Therefore you have your people controlling the medical team because, although your target hasn’t died, there is now a credible reason for them to die. There has been a crash. The medical team’s job (or those in charge, anyway) is to make sure that the target does not survive, no matter what condition they may be in to start with.


Even those who dismiss the idea that Diana was murdered have questioned the astonishing delay in getting her to hospital when, according to the official medical reports, she was suffering from an injury that required urgent surgery. The doctors say that the pulmonary vein had been ruptured near the heart and this was filling her lungs with blood. Diana was lying in the tunnel bleeding to death, if that is correct. The only way her life was going to be saved with such an injury was through immediate surgery.


So why was it more than an hour and a half before she arrived at the hospital? Within a minute of impact, Doctor Frederic Mailliez with an American ‘friend’ Mark Butt, drove into the tunnel from the opposite direction. A private investigator I know has made extensive inquiries into Mailliez and Butt and, while these investigations continue, his findings strongly suggest there is more to both of them than we are being told. The crash happened at 12.25am and by 12.26, Doctor Mailliez said he had seen the crushed Mercedes, stopped his car, turned on warning lights, run across to the Mercedes to establish there were two people dead and two alive and had rung the emergency services.


This man must be a seriously quick worker. He is one of 160 Parisian doctors who are on constant call for emergencies in hospitals and private homes as part of a French insurance system, SOS Medecins. He had treated accident victims many times when he was a member of SAMU, the French emergency ambulance service. And yet a doctor on constant call for emergencies says that all he had in his car to help Diana was an oxygen cylinder and mask! Mailliez was in control of Diana and her condition for the crucial 15 to 20 minutes before his former employers, the SAMU emergency team, arrived to take over.


He claims that Diana did not say anything to him, but this contradicts his comment to the London Times that,

“She kept saying how much she hurt as I put a resuscitation mask over her mouth”.

Trevor Rees-Jones, the bodyguard, also says he had flashbacks of hearing a female voice calling out in the back of the car:

“First it’s a groan. Then Dodi’s name was called... And that can only be Princess Diana’s voice” he told the Daily Mirror.53

How reliable that statement is, however, is open to debate. What does seem to be clear is that Diana was conscious or at least semi-conscious when Mailliez arrived.


He told the CNN chat show host, Larry King, that:

“She looked pretty fine. At the beginning... from the outside, you know, she looked pretty fine. But inside, you know, the internal injury was already starting... It’s really funny. That’s the only part, where she was sitting, that’s the only part which was still intact.”

Mailliez on one hand told a French medical magazine that: “I thought her life could be saved” and yet said another time that “It was hopeless.


There was nothing we could do to save her.” He also told King that although Diana is the most photographed woman in the world, and the paparazzi were taking shots of her while he was with her in the tunnel, he had no idea that she was Princess Diana until he saw the news reports the following morning. Excuse me? The pigs are airborne again. When the emergency team arrived, Malliez says he left the scene because there was nothing more he could do.

The official explanation for the incredible delay in taking Diana to hospital is that she was trapped in the wreckage. This is a lie, lie, lie. One of the ambulance crew told the French newspaper, La Parisien, that when he arrived Diana was lying with most of her body out of the car with her legs resting on the rear seat. “She was agitated, semi knocked out, but conscious... she was groaning and struggling feebly. She murmured ‘Oh my God’ several times.”


The Scotsman newspaper, in an investigation published on September 11th 1997, established that Diana was removed from the car shortly after the fire brigade arrived and the excuse of her being ‘trapped’ does not stand up. Another official excuse for the delay is that the emergency doctors had to give her a blood transfusion. This is another lie, lie, lie. SAMU teams do not carry blood transfusion equipment because they would not know the victim’s blood type.


When the ambulance did leave the tunnel, the driver was ordered to go no faster than 25 miles an hour and some reports say it took as long as 40 minutes to cover the 3.7 miles (6km) to the La Pitie-Salpetriere. Four other hospitals quite capable of treating Diana were closer to the scene and the ambulance stopped twice on the way for ‘delicate interventions’, one of them within sight of the hospital. Diana arrived at La Pitie-Salpetriere about 2.lOam, an hour and 45 minutes after the crash happened.


By any medical criteria whatsoever this delay was utterly ludicrous, unless it was meant to happen. It doesn’t take a genius to see why, despite such apparent incompetence, there has been no inquiry into the medical response that night. Waiting at the hospital were a surgical team headed by Professor Bruno Riou, the duty surgeon who, we are told, first heard about the crash while doing his rounds. Is it only me that finds it strange that a renowned surgeon is ‘doing his rounds’ in the early hours of the morning?


Waiting with him when Diana arrived were Professor Pierre Coriat, the head of anaesthetics, Professor Alain Pavie, a chest and heart specialist, and Professor Pierre Benazet, another experienced surgeon. They had been in telephone communication with the emergency team in the tunnel throughout. We are told they opened Diana’s chest cavity, repaired the vein, and ‘battled to save her’ for an hour and a half before admitting defeat. I find this remarkable, also, because the autopsy report apparently shows that Diana was clinically dead at 12.45 am while still lying in the tunnel.


She would therefore have been clinically dead for an hour and 25 minutes before she even arrived at the hospital and for three hours before the professors walked out of the operating theatre to announce that she had died. Having the body examined at a location you control is vital in such assassinations. President Kennedy’s body was flown immediately out of Dallas to the Brotherhood-front, the Bethesda Naval Center near Washington DC, for the post mortem. Here the president’s brain went missing (or his look-alike’s did) and, as the US Assassination Records Review Board revealed, the autopsy notes and the first draft of the post mortem were burned.

So who was behind Diana’s assassination? It is important to stress that those who gave the order and those who did the deed would be very different. We are looking at a Brotherhood here, a spider’s web, and while the order will have come from the spider or spiders in the centre, it will have been mostly carried out by the flies. It is highly unlikely that it would have been done directly by British Intelligence because that would be too obvious.


Intelligence agencies subcontract the assassinations of their own citizens to put them at arms length from the incident and to allow them to ‘plausibly deny’ that they were responsible. For instance, there is considerable evidence that President Kennedy was shot by members of an elite rifle team within a renegade unit of French Intelligence called the OAS, or at least that they were involved in the plot. Olof Palme, the Bilderberger Prime Minister of Sweden, was murdered in Stockholm in 1986 on the orders of, among others, George Bush. But the killing was carried out by members of BOSS, the South African Intelligence agency (see .. And The Truth Shall Set You Free).


The British Foreign Office has its own assassination squad called Group 13 (that number again) and British Intelligence has a long and sick history of political and economic assassinations. British Intelligence consists of MIS (Military Intelligence 5) which is responsible officially for domestic security, and M16 which deals with overseas matters. MIS announced in 1988 that they do not assassinate people. No, they get others to do it for them.


This pathetic denial was prompted by the revelations of the former MIS agent, David Shayler, that M16 had organised a plot to assassinate Libya’s Colonel Gaddafi. The attempt had failed because the bomb was put under the wrong car. Shayler was head of the ‘Libyan Desk’ at MIS and was in the perfect position to know. Robin Cook, the Foreign Secretary, who is so far out of his depth he needs a frogman’s suit, said that he had been assured that no such event took place.


Oh, that’s OK then. The attorney-general banned David Shayler from appearing on the ITV programme, Diana - Secrets of the Crash, and later Shayler was arrested and jailed in Paris awaiting extradition to London. Why do that if what he is saying is such nonsense? Because, of course, he’s right. By the way, the oath of allegiance by British Intelligence officers is not to the government, but to the monarch. It is the same with Members of Parliament and the military. Ultimately the Queen is their boss under the law, although, in truth, their boss is whoever controls the Queen because even she is not at the top of the pile.

The type of organisation most likely to have been involved in Diana’s death, at the operational level is typified by the Pinay Circle or ‘Le Cercle’ which has a number of British establishment figures in its ranks. Le Cercle is an offshoot of the even more elite Safari Club, which was set up by Count Alexander de Maranches, the Director during the 1970s of the French Service for External Documentation and Espionage.


It was the Safari Club which arranged for the alliance between a French Intelligence front-company called Group Bull and the computer giant Honeywell which is, you will be surprised to know, the world’s biggest manufacturer of landmines. This alliance supplied landmines to both sides in the Bosnian conflict. The Safari Club began as a consortium of the secret police of the Shah of Iran called SAVAK, Saddam Hussein in Iraq, Anwar Sadat of Egypt and Saudi Arabian Intelligence. It has been involved in countless coups in Africa to further its goals and is heavily involved in arms trading and supply.


Out of the Safari Club came the Pinay Circle or Le Cercle, named after the French Prime Minister, Antoine Pinay, who attended the first Bilderberg Meeting in Oosterbeek, Holland, in May 1954. Others involved with Le Cercle included the Habsburg family. To give you an idea of its make up and range of influence, the Le Cercle membership has included Nicholas Elliot, a department head at M16; William Colby, a former director of the CIA; Colonel Botta of Swiss Military Intelligence; Stefano Della Chiaie, a leading member of the Italian Secret Service; Giullo Andreotti, the former Italian Prime Minister from the notorious P2 Freemasonry Lodge and the man who gave the Mafia official protection; Silva Munoz, a former minister for the fascist, Franco, in Spain and a member of the Elite secret society, Opus Dei; Franz Josef Strauss, the German defence minister; and Monsignor Brunello, an agent to the Vatican.


In America, one of the Le Cercle fronts is the CIA-backed Heritage Foundation in Washington. Look at the potential for such an organisation to be the coordinating force between countless different agencies and countries all to achieve a common aim. The Safari Club-Le Cercle network provides the Arab-British-French connection necessary to arrange for Diana to be in Paris at the right time, the security for her to be withdrawn, the assassination to be carried out, and those involved to get away with it.


What was that John Stalker said? “Why would the French want to cover up the murder of a British woman?” It is also interesting that Simon Regan in his book, Who Killed Diana?, says that it was Le Cercle which destabilized the Gough Whitlam government in Australia in 1975. The Queen was certainly involved in that, too. As I explained earlier, it was her Governor of Australia, John Kerr, who removed Whitlam in the end. If the Windsors and Le Cercle worked together to bring down an elected Australian Government, why could they not have worked together to eliminate Diana?

Paris, with its immense Brotherhood associations going back centuries, has long been a favourite location for their murders and plots. Amschel Rothschild from the English branch of the family, was murdered there in his hotel room in 1996 in what
some claim to have been part of one of the inter-Brotherhood wars which have littered their history.


For an organization like Le Cercle, or its many mirrors in London, it would have been easy to place its people in the right places. Mohamed Al Fayed’s security operation is awash with former members of elite British military and police units who know the consequences of saying “No” to the Brotherhood, even if they don’t wish to be involved. In the same way, these spider structures ensure that their people control the inquiries into their assassinations, as they did most famously with Kennedy. Even Mohamed Al Fayed’s personal investigation into Diana’s death was headed by Pierre Ottavoili, a former chief of the Criminal Brigade, the criminal investigation department of French Police.


This is the same organization which is also responsible for the official investigation. Al Fayed’s chief lawyer in Paris is a former French Justice Minister, and in overall charge in London is John Macnamara, his head of security and a former Chief Superintendent at the headquarters of London’s Metropolitan Police, Scotland Yard. In the Spring of 1998, Macnamara was part of a ‘sting’ operation involving the FBI, CIA and possibly, the Israeli (Rothschild) Intelligence Agency Mossad, to arrest a former CIA agent Oswald Le Winter, a 67-year-old American born in Austria.


Le Winter contacted Al Fayed claiming to have documents for sale proving the involvement of M16 and the CIA in Diana’s murder. He was asking $10 million and after a meeting with Macnamara he was given an advance of $15,000. A further meeting was arranged in Vienna, Austria, for the key documents and the rest of the money to be handed over. In the meantime, however, Al Fayed called a friend in the FBI, who contacted the CIA.


Le Winter was followed, spied on, and lured to the Ambassador Hotel in Vienna on Wednesday April 22nd, where with support from the Austrian police a combination of FBI, CIA and possibly Mossad agents pounced on him. All this for an alleged hoaxer? The story would have remained secret, but for Peter Grolig, an Austrian journalist on the Kurier newspaper. He reported what happened and established that when Le Winter’s hotel room was searched, four documents, two of them in code, were found and appeared to be genuine CIA documents.


The CIA have since admitted tapping Diana’s phone calls in, and to, America and passing the contents to British Intelligence. Le Winter was arrested and held in custody. Grolig’s story forced Al Fayed to admit that it was true. So was Le Winter trapped by such an array of international security personnel because he was selling a hoax to Al Fayed or because he was selling the truth? Another intelligence insider also insists the crash was not an accident.


Richard Tomlinson, a former agent of Britain’s M16, gave evidence to the French inquiry into Diana’s death. In 1997 Tomlinson served a six month jail sentence under the Official Secrets Act for trying to sell his memoirs. In August 1998 he was arrested again, at gun point, in Paris at the request of the British Government who were concerned at his association in that city with the MIS whistle-blower, David Shayler, who was also arrested and jailed in Paris.54


Tomlinson apparently told Herve Stephan, the judge in charge of the ‘inquiry’, that Diana was murdered. According to a report on the BBC’s news service, Ceefax, on August 28th 1998, he told the judge that Henri Paul was an asset of British Intelligence and so was “One of the bodyguards”. Which one was not named. Meanwhile Herve Stephan, a Brotherhood placeman, is doing all he can to hold the line that it was an accident.

The most important question to ask when you are trying to identify those responsible for a crime is: “Who benefits?” As the Roman writer, Seneca, said: “He who most benefits from a crime is the one most likely to have committed it”. Well the Windsors benefited magnificently. No longer is Diana there to continue her inevitable destruction of the Monarchy’s credibility and public esteem with her actions and her knowledge of their secrets. No longer is she there to bring her influence on the upbringing and attitudes of the future king, Prince William and his brother Prince Harry.


The Windsors now have complete control of them, to mould them into their image. They couldn’t do that before because Diana’s influence was too strong and I hope the memory of that will encourage the princes to withstand the indoctrination. The way is now paved for Charles’ marriage to Camilla Parker-Bowles without the complication of Diana and, of course, his royal duty to produce Windsor heirs with Spencer genes, although as we shall see, William might not be his child. Understandably, it has been suggested that Diana was killed because of her campaign against landmines. This is not true, not directly anyway.


The landmine manufacturers have done very nicely from her campaign, because they make far more money from clearing mines than they do making them. A mine costs about £30 to produce, but at least £3,000 to clear. Clearing all the mines around the world is estimated at £330 billion. No, the landmine manufacturers like Honeywell were not against Diana’s campaign, they loved it for their own reasons. But what she showed very clearly was the power she had to take an issue from the shadows and hurl it into the public arena. The question could well have been: “What will she do next?”. And what was it that Diana had to reveal, as she told my contact, that would “Shake the world”?


Henry Kissinger, one of the greatest Brotherhood manipulators of the 20th century, met Diana a number of times and sickeningly attended her funeral. He said in an interview after her death that:

“She was politically and diplomatically uncontrollable”. That is Kissinger-speak for “That’s one reason she was killed”.

From the perspective of the operational level of the Brotherhood pyramid, as with Kennedy, there were many reasons why they wanted her dead. But, as I keep emphasizing, that is only one level. At the top are the Elite black magic adepts, the reptilian full bloods and crossbreeds.


At the highest level of the Brotherhood, Diana’s death, like Kennedy’s, was a ritual killing. It was long planned for the effect it would have on the people and the magnetic field of the Earth, and to symbolise the introduction of the New World Order. Don’t underestimate the fantastic power of ritual and symbolism in affecting the human psyche and the planet’s magnetic field. These people are not obsessed with it for no reason.

The Brotherhood and Satanic symbolism surrounding Diana’s death is endless and to understand the background to her ritual murder we must, once again, go back a very long time. Diana was one of the greatest goddesses of the ancient world and she represented the female energy also known as Barati, Britannia, Isis, Artemis, Aphrodite, all these different names for the same energy. If you go back far enough, they symbolise the same entity, also, Ninkharsag.


Diana was known as a Moon goddess. One tribe of Elite bloodlines who worshipped the goddess Diana were called the Sicambrian Franks who can be traced from Troy (that name again), through Asia Minor, now Turkey, the Caucasus Mountains (again) and up into Europe. They lived at one time in an area west of the River Danube and settled in Germania, named by the Romans after the Scythian ‘genuine ones’ with their centre in Cologne.


They also invaded parts of Roman-occupied Gaul, the land which is now Belgium and northern France, from where the ‘noble’ families of Scotland were to come. It is from these Sicambrian Franks that we get the name France. At the time of King Meroveus, who was named Guardian of the Franks in 448, this people became known as the Merovingians and Princess Diana, through the Stuart bloodline, was related to them. Many seem to believe that the Merovingians are descended from the bloodline of Jesus, but how they can be genetically descended from a myth defeats me. This is a diversion to mislead.


They are, however, an Elite bloodline that goes back to the Aryan race in the ancient Middle and Near East and eventually goes off planet. The Merovingians were the sorcerer kings who were noted for their esoteric knowledge and magical powers which they inherited from the underground bloodline streams of secret groups and initiations. Francio, the founder of the Franks, claimed to be a descendant of Noah and his ancestors once resided in ancient Troy of wooden horse fame.


The French city of Troyes, where the Templars were officially formed, was named by the Sicambrian Franks after their former home. The Iliad says that Troy was founded by Dardanus, the son of the Greek god Zeus, who was depicted as both an eagle and a serpent. Zeus was born in Arcadia in Sparta, it is said, and the Spartans migrated into France. These are the bloodlines we are talking about here, not those of ‘Jesus’.

The city of Paris was established by the Sicambrian Franks in the 6th century after they became known as the Merovingians. It was named after Prince Paris, the son of King Priam of Troy. It was the relationship between Prince Paris and Helen of Sparta which supposedly caused the Trojan War in which the Trojan Horse (infiltration) assured victory for the Spartans. Both the Trojans and the Spartans were branches of the same Aryan peoples and within them were the reptilian bloodlines.


Paris in those days was confined to an island in the River Seine which is now known as the Ile de la Cite or Isle of the City. The Notre Dame Cathedral, built by the Templars on a site of former Diana worship, stands on the Ile de la Cite today and this is where the Templar Grand Master, Jacques de Molay, was roasted to death.


The Merovingians established the city of Paris on a major vortex point which is why the Notre Dame Cathedral is built on that spot. Meroveus, the founder of the Merovingian dynasty, followed the goddess cult of Diana and this is not surprising because the epicentre for Diana worship was at the famous temple at Ephesus in Asia Minor, not far from the alleged site of Troy. The temple is named as one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World. Diana was known as Queen of Heaven, just like Semiramis.


Outside the original Paris - and now very much inside the modern city - the Merovingians established an underground chamber for the worship of the goddess Diana and for the blood rituals and human sacrifices to her. This site dates back at least to 500-750 AD and it was here that kings in dispute over property would settle the issue in combat. According to legend, anyone killed there goes straight to Heaven and sits at the right hand of God. Now get this: The location today of this underground sacrificial site for the goddess Diana is... the Pont de L’Alma tunnel!

The word pont relates to Pontifex, a Roman high priest, and it means passage or bridge. Alma comes from Al-Mah, a Middle Eastern name for, wait for it... the Moon goddess. So the Pont de UAlma translates as ‘Bridge of the Moon Goddess’ and the adjoining Place de L’Alma is the ‘Place of the Moon Goddess’. And the Moon goddess is Diana. It can also translate as ‘Bridge of the Soul’ and a ‘Maiden’ of the goddess Diana was called an Al-mah! This is why Henri Paul was programmed to drive past the turning to Dodi Fayed’s flat and head for the Pont de L’Alma tunnel.


This is why the emergency team kept her in the tunnel for so long instead of rushing her to hospital where her life would have been saved. She wasn’t meant to be saved and they only moved her when she was clinically dead, as the autopsy report confirmed. According to Brotherhood Satanic ritual, Diana had to die in that underground chamber on the ancient sacrificial site and it had to happen at night under the Moon in the goddess month of August, ruled according to legend by the Roman version of Isis, Diana, etc: Juno Augusta.


The Satanists in the emergency team simply ensured that Diana would not leave the tunnel (sacrificial chamber) alive. We are told she bled to death and, if this is correct, it was precisely in accordance with their blood rites and sacrificial rites. But was the bleeding caused in the way we are told, or by some other chemical means? We now know that Diana was clinically dead about 12.45 am, yet she was taken to the La Pitie Salpetriere Hospital and kept in the operating theatre for an hour and a half while the medical team, Professor Bruno Riou, Professor Pierre Coriat, Professor Alain Pavie and Professor Jean Pierre Benazat, cut open her chest and “battled to save her”.


Save a woman who had already been clinically dead for an hour and fifteen minutes when she arrived at the hospital? When they had finished, the French Minister of the Interior, Jean-Pierre Chevenement, decreed, according to his senior advisor, Sami Mani, that there would be strictly no admittance to the room in which her body was laid out.55 Chevenement was one of several ‘VIPs’ who rushed to the tunnel and observed the medical operation at this former sacrificial site.56


The Brotherhood Mother Goddess, Arizona Wilder, said that Guy de Rothschild had talked about Diana’s death in early 1998 when he tried to reprogramme her at a house in Sherman Oaks, Los Angeles. Rothschild was using a pseudonym, Dr Barrington. He said that he was in the tunnel that night to “Steal Diana’s soul” through the ‘evil eye’ hypnotic gaze the reptiles use at the point of death. I explained this earlier in relation to Pindar. A contact in Denmark told me that during her last year of medical studies at the Copenhagen University in 1983 she realized that severely mentally ill patients were being used for experiments by being inseminated with genetically tampered semen.


The pregnancy, she said, was very painful and often unsuccessful. Sometimes the patient died and the foetus was dissected in secrecy. She went on: “The doctors conducting these experiments were professors, heads of departments, PhDs, the most outstanding in their field. They had a kind of Brotherhood... many of them were psychic and monkeyed with black magic. Incredible amounts of money were flowing to them.” A story that could be repeated thousands of times all over the world.

Another name for the goddess Diana is Hecate. One of the ancient ‘triads’ or ‘trinities’ was that of Diana, Luna and Hecate who were said to be three aspects of the same female energy. It was called Diana on Earth, Luna in Heaven, and Hecate in Hell.

Hecate is one of the premier deities of Satanism and she is a version of Aphrodite and Venus, different names for the same energy. After her husband’s death, Jackie Kennedy travelled to the Greek island of Delos in the south west Aegean Sea, the legendary birthplace of Diana and Apollo and the considered domain of Hecate, the goddess of the ‘infernal arts’. Delos is known for this reason as the Island of the Dead.


Hecate was portayed as both the virgin and the whore and crossroads are the sacred places of Diana-Hecate. It is at crossroads that the witches and the Grand Masters and sorcerers of Freemasonry perform their rituals. Crossroads are symbolic of the vortex points created where ley lines cross. In ritual sex magic, the wearing of clothes of the opposite sex and the performance of bi-sexual acts are called ‘Crossroad Rites’.


The women involved were called ‘dikes’. Crossroads are also places of human and animal sacrifice and Hecate is known as a ‘sex and death goddess’ and the goddess of witchcraft and sorcery. At the Pont de L’Alma, right at the spot where Diana died, the road that goes through the tunnel is crossed on the surface by another road which leads onto the Pont de L’Alma Bridge. In fact this spot is a maze of crossroads. And Diana died in the early morning of August 31st. Hecate’s Day in the Satanic calendar is August 13th, but under the Satanic law of reverse symbolism and reverse numbers, Hecate’s day of sacrifice is... August 31st!!

So just look at the symbolism of this. Diana, named after the ancient Moon goddess, was driven from the Ritz and through the Place de la Concorde where she passed the 3,200 year-old Egyptian obelisk brought to Paris from Luxor with it’s tip or pyramid coloured bright gold symbolising the penis of Osiris.


It was at this very point, a minute from where Diana died, that Queen Marie Antoinette was beheaded at the guillotine during the Brotherhood-engineered French Revolution, another symbolic blood sacrifice of the female energy. Diana was then driven at speed to the Pont de UAlma tunnel, the Bridge or Place of the Moon Goddess, where the car struck the 13th pillar, the symbolism for which is simply enormous for obvious reasons and for others I’ll come to later.


Now she was left to die on the very site of an ancient underground sacrificial chamber to the goddess Diana and bled to death according to Satanic ritual. She also died at a crossroads with one road under the ground, the other above, and the crossroads is the sacred place for the Satanic deity, Hecate, another aspect of the ‘Diana’ energy. And it all happened on Hecate’s day for sacrifice, August 31st. Does anyone doubt that this was a ritual murder? And I’ve not even nearly finished with the symbolism surrounding her death. Remember what David Berkowitz, the Satanist serial killer in New York known as the Son of Sam, wrote about those involved in the Satanic network:

“...Satanists (genuine ones) are peculiar people. They aren’t ignorant peasants or semi-literate natives. Rather, their ranks are filled with doctors, lawyers, businessmen, and basically highly responsible citizens... They are not a careless group who are apt to make mistakes. But they are secretive and bonded together by a common need and desire to mete out havoc on society. It was Aleister Crowley who said: ‘I want blasphemy, murder, rape, revolution, anything bad’.”57

It is worth emphasising again here the Satanists’ relationship with female energy.

The challenge we all face is to balance male and female energies and so enjoy the best aspects of them and not the extremes. The Satanists, however, seek to express only the extremes, thus creating disharmony and conflict. They use the malevolent, highly negative expressions of the female energy (covert manipulation behind the scenes) to create the events and circumstances which the extremes of the male energy (macho men, soldiers, terrorism) can play out in the public arena.


Because of this it appears that the world is controlled and dominated by male energy - it’s a ‘mans world’, but in truth it is not a world dominated by the male, it is a world dominated by extremes of male and female. I am not talking men and women here, I mean male and female energy which can be expressed by both men or women. For instance, the Brotherhood manipulators like Henry Kissinger never see a gun fired in anger.


They are not out there physically fighting (male energy) in the wars they engineer. They are manipulating events from the shadows and behind our backs, a trait of the negative female energy and symbolized by the story of the Trojan Horse. The female energy is also the creative force and you can create negatively or positively. The Brotherhood are highly malevolent, but very creative. For this reason, in esoteric law and symbolism, the female energy (Diana, Semiramis, Isis, Barati, Britannia) is given different names for its different expressions.


The Egyptians portrayed Isis in white in her positive mode and in black to symbolize her negative aspect. In the same way we have the symbolism of Diana (positive female) and Hecate (negative female). They are simply different symbolic names for different manifestations of the female energy. The Satanists of the Brotherhood work with the Hecate energy and that is why they worship this deity. They are actually worshipping the extreme negative female energy and it is for this reason that in Satanism the high priestess is considered as important as the priest, if not more so.


At that Elite centre for Satanism in Belgium, the Castle of Darkness I mentioned in an earlier chapter, the top position in the hierarchy is not known as the king, but the Queen Mother. So in the Pont de L’Alma Tunnel the positive female energy (love, compassion, intuition), symbolized by Diana, was eliminated by the negative female energy (manipulation, ritual death), symbolised by Hecate and the crossroads.

The death of Dodi Fayed was also crucial to the Satanic symbolism. Given the circumstances of his death, it is quite a coincidence that his real name, Emad El Din, is Arabic for ‘Pillar of Faith’. Dodi was a nickname he was given as a toddler by his family. This, too, is interesting. It is very close to Dido and in fact ‘Dido’ was the nickname he gave to Diana. Dido in Greek mythology was the legendary founder and queen of Carthage (an Aryan people connected to the Phoenicians) and she was the daughter of Belus, king of the Phoenician city of Tyre.


When Dido’s husband was killed by her brother, Pygmalion, she fled with her followers to North Africa where she purchased Carthage from the native ruler, Larbus. He later threatened Dido with war unless she married him, but instead she killed herself. But the most likely symbols for Dodi Fayed’s death can be found in his birthplace, Egypt. The Brotherhood are obsessed with the symbolism in ancient Egypt of the Osiris-Horus-Isis trinity (Nimrod-Tammuz-Semiramis) which is expressed in Christianity as father, son, and holy ghost. Among many things, it symbolises the male and female energies coming together to create a third force, new life.

To the Egyptians, and therefore the Brotherhood, the son of God was Horus. He was born to Isis after her husband, Osiris, had been murdered by Set. She gathered together 14 parts of his mutilated body, but she could not find the penis. So she created a penis and impregnated herself to conceive Horus, the Sun God -Sun King, Horus was Osiris reborn. In Paris, part of this ritual was played out again.


The car passed the golden-tipped Egyptian obelisk, the penis of Osiris, in the Place de la Concorde, and inside the vehicle were Diana (another name for Isis) and the Egyptian, Dodi Fayed, representing Osiris. I have heard from many sources that Diana was pregnant. Her foetus symbolized Horus, the Sun King. In ancient Egypt, they said that Osiris had to die before Horus could come in. This will sound amazing to most people, but if you study the unbelievable obsession these people have with ritual and symbolism it makes perfect sense.


Diana may not even have realized she was pregnant. It could have been the foetus they were removing on the operating table in Paris while they “battled to save her” for hours after she was clinically dead. I have heard suggestions that the cells from the foetus are being used to clone babies from this genetic mix. These will be ‘Sun gods’ according to Brotherhood ritual. The cloning of humans has been possible for a long time, as the cloning of sheep at the Roslyn Institute near Rosslyn Chapel in Scotland has clearly shown.


The Brotherhood’s secret science is always far in advance of anything allowed into the public domain and because of this the public find it impossible to believe what the Brotherhood can do with drugs and technology. So it is with their mind control techniques and I am sure that both Diana and Dodi had been under the influence of mind manipulation over many weeks to ensure the ritual happened as required. For goodness sake, a stage hypnotist can take over the mind of someone from the audience. Just think what is possible for those mind manipulators at the global cutting edge.

The Pont de L’Alma is one of the most sacred places in the world to the Brotherhood and, as with the street plans in all their key cities, they made sure the site was full of appropriate symbolism: the bridge, the underground chamber, the crossroads and the name. Since my own spiritual awakening in 19901 have been guided by my subconscious intuition to many Earth power centres.


Often I have not been aware of this at the time and only with hindsight have I seen how, on a non-conscious level, I had been drawn to a major vortex point on the magnetic grid system and often to those of particular importance to the Brotherhood. In 1994 I was on holiday with my family near the Normandy coast in France and we decided to visit Paris. It was a long drive, but we had never seen the city before. We drove to Versailles outside Paris and took the train from there to the station at the Eiffel Tower. It was a hot, humid, and sweaty day, and the area was packed with people and heavy with traffic.


This combination was so unpleasant that we decided not to stay very long before taking the train back to Versailles, but first we went for a short walk. We crossed the River Seine by a footbridge near the Eiffel Tower and walked a hundred yards or so alongside the river bank on the far side before finding a seat to rest. After sitting there for about ten minutes we walked over the nearby road bridge and back to the railway station to leave the city. We were in the place for little more than an hour and that is all I had experienced of Paris until I went back to research Diana’s death for this book.

When I returned to Paris I had quite a shock because I found that seat again where we rested in 1994. It is on top of the Pont de L’Alma tunnel very close to the 13th pillar where the car crashed! Also, near that seat above the mouth of the tunnel is a large depiction of a lighted torch (see picture section). This, of course, is the most obvious Brotherhood signature of them all and after President Kennedy’s ritual killing, the Freemasons erected an obelisk in Dealey Plaza with a lighted torch at the top. Another flame was placed on his grave.


The one on the Pont de UAlma Tunnel stands on a black pentagram and there isn’t a more powerful Satanic symbol than that. It is supposed to be a ‘Flame of Liberty’ (a copy of the flame held by the Statue of Liberty) to commemorate those who died in the Second World War, but it’s location has, predictably, ensured that it has become a shrine to Diana. One newspaper report said that the French authorities were considering a permanent memorial to Diana at the Pont de L’Alma - a continuation of the 13th pillar above the ground! I can’t think of anything more sick or more symbolic than that. The last I heard they planned to open a vegetable garden to commemorate her death and they were going to pull down a building to make way for it.


The garden is an area of Paris that Diana is never known to have visited and she had no recorded passion for growing vegetables. So what goes on? Well, first I bet you’ll find that the vegetable garden will be on another ancient site of some kind, and most importantly such an inadequate and bizarre memorial will ensure that the flame above the tunnel will now remain the public shrine to Diana.

The Flame of Liberty was placed on the tunnel entrance in 1987 and I am certain the assassination of Diana at that spot was planned well before then. It is quite conceivable, given the Brotherhood’s long term planning and meticulous attention to ritual and symbolic detail, that it was planned for decades. Definitely before the sacrificial lamb was hooked into the Windsor web to marry Charles. It was Brotherhood symbolism which decided the location of their wedding at St Paul’s Cathedral.


St Paul’s, with its vast dome, was designed by Sir Christopher Wren, the high Brotherhood initiate. It’s design is mirrored by both the Congress Building in Washington DC and by the Pantheon in Paris. Brutus, the Trojan who became first king of the Britons in about 1,1º3BC, was the man who founded ‘New Troy’, known today as London. He was another who worshipped the goddess Diana and he is reported to have erected a temple to her on what is now called Ludgate Hill on the site of a former stone circle.58 This is in the heart of the City of London financial district, that centre of Brotherhood control, and today on this site of Diana worship you will find... St Paul’s Cathedral.


In Paris, the Notre Dame (Our Lady) Cathedral is on an ancient site of Diana worship and the ambulance carrying the princess’s body passed Notre Dame during that bizarre journey to hospital. So Diana was married on an ancient sacred site to the goddess Diana and she died on the site of an ancient sacrificial chamber of the goddess Diana. She was also hunted and used by the Windsors to produce heirs and Diana was the ancient goddess of hunting, fertility and childbirth.

When Prince Charles and Diana’s sisters went to Paris to escort her body back to London, the coffin was draped in the royal standard, the flag of the Windsors which is covered with the Sun symbol, the lion. Not the flag of the country, you’ll note, but the flag of the Windsors. Another strange coincidence happened at the Hammersmith Mortuary in London. As her coffin arrived, the one carrying Dodi was leaving and they apparently crossed at the entrance. What are the statistical chances of that when both made such very different journeys from Paris? Dodi, we were told, had to be buried within 24 hours of his death according to Muslim religious law and there was a mad rush by his father to meet the deadline. There was no autopsy on his body, a quick external examination was considered enough.

At this point, Diana’s brother, Charles, Earl Spencer, then 33, came on the scene after flying back from his home in Cape Town, South Africa. When Earl Spencer, the Queen’s god-son, made his maiden speech in the House of Lords in 1993, he chose a rather strange subject, Satanism On The Spencer’s Althorp Estate In Northamptonshire. He acknowledged that it was going on, but he said he was doing all he could to eradicate it. What a remarkable topic to introduce in your first speech in the Houses of Parliament.

The Brotherhood Mother Goddess, Arizona Wilder, reports seeing Earl Spencer and his father at some of the sacrificial rituals she conducted. It was Earl Spencer who announced that, despite her wishes, Diana’s body would not be interred in the family tomb at the local village church at Great Brington near the estate. Earl Spencer said he wanted to avoid swamping the village with sightseers and he had decided that Diana would be buried on a man-made island in the centre of a lake on the Althorp Estate.


The lake is called The Oval and when looked at from above, the island looks like a dot within a circle, a symbol of the Sun. The flame in a circle is on Kennedy’s grave. Also on the island, Spencer has placed the Brotherhood symbol of a burning flame and at one stage, Mohamed Al Fayed said he was going to put an ‘eternal flame’ to Diana and Dodi on the roof of Harrods to mark the first anniversary of their deaths in August 1998.59 Islands are very much part of the legends of the goddess Diana and she was supposed to have been born on the island of Delos in the Aegean Sea.


It is also known as the Island of the Dead after Hecate, the patroness of the ‘infernal arts’, the negative aspect of the Diana goddess energy. Diana is another name for Brito-Martis, the goddess of Crete which was colonised and developed by the Phoenicians who created the Minoan civilisation.


Brito-Martis was actually a Phoenician goddess, according to Greek and Roman legend. She was the divine ‘daughter’ of Phoinix (correctly spelt) the King of Phoenicia, and was armed, like Diana, with weapons for the chase. Legend says that Brito-Martis (Diana) sailed from Phoenicia to Argos in Southern Greece and onto Crete where she was pursued by her unwelcome admirer, Minos. She escaped by retreating to the sea and sailed to Aegina, an island in the Aegean where stands the temple of Artemis or Diana. Islands and Diana are very much connected in the legends.


Earl Spencer put Diana’s grave among trees on the island and this is classic symbolism because the ancients used to worship the goddess Diana in the tree groves and this was said to be her most sacred place. Sir James Frazer describes in his book, The Golden Bough, the Diana rite known as the King of the Wood at Lake Nemi (again a lake is a big part of Diana legend).


The Lady of the Lake is also Brotherhood symbolism. Frazer says that on the northern shore of Lake Nemi, under the cliffs on which the modern village of Nemi, near Aricia, is perched, was the sacred grove and sanctuary of Diana Nemorensis, or Diana of the Wood, the goddess of hunting. Lake Nemi is the most celebrated shrine to the goddess Diana and here, says Frazer, there grew a tree around which the figure of a priest would be seen with a sword.


A candidate for the priesthood in the cult of Diana could only succeed by killing the present incumbent and he would only keep the job until someone in turn killed him. The post carried the title of king - King of the Wood and a long line of priest-kings who served Diana met a violent end. So the goddess Diana is associated with islands and a lake and was worshipped among the trees. And Earl Spencer puts his sister’s grave among the trees on an island in a lake.

Then there is the strange tale of the black swans. In June 1998, Earl Spencer gave an interview for BBC Television in which he told of a dream he claimed to have had between the crash in Paris and Diana’s funeral. In the dream, he said, he had been told to put four black swans on the lake around the island. When he called his estate manager the next morning and asked him where he would find four black swans, the manager is supposed to have said: “You’ve heard then?”. “Heard what?”, Spencer claims to have asked. “We’ve been offered four black swans”, the estate manager replied. Maybe this is true, but, in my view, this story has more to do with flying pigs than flying swans.


Black swans are profound occult symbols used in rituals and were the seal of the infamous Satanist, Catherine de Medici, who, Arizona Wilder says, was a previous incarnation of the Queen Mother. They appear most obviously in the ballet, Swan Lake, when the black swan, symbolising the negative female energy, kills the white swan, symbolising the positive. In other words, Hecate kills Diana. What better symbolism can you have of Swan Lake than black swans on a lake, as at Althorp? A swan is a derogatory term in Druidism.


Project Monarch slaves who rebel are told that they will be “Turned into swans” and Diana, of course, rebelled against the Windsors. The number of swans also fits here. Monarch programming includes a term called The Four Gates of Heaven and four could also symbolise the four phases of the Moon. Earl Spencer has established a ‘temple’ to Diana at the side of the lake. A number of the stately homes of the British aristocracy have temples or areas featuring the goddess Diana, among them Blenheim Palace home of the Marlboroughs and Chatsworth House, headquarters of the Cavendish’s, the Dukes of Devonshire, and both families are related to the Spencers.


Diana was carried in a lead lined coffin and lead is the metal associated in ritual magic with Saturn, possibly from where we get the name Satan. The colour associated with Saturn and Satanism is black. Diana was also led to her death across the two key Brotherhood days of Saturn-day and Sun-day. The 15th-century Italian philosopher-doctor from Horence, Marsiho Ficino, produced talismans for protection and the one for Saturn was engraved on pure lead. It was said to protect the wearer against death by assassination and ambush and protected women in childbirth.


On Diana’s lead coffin during the funeral were lilies, the flower of Lilith, another version of Hecate and a symbol of the bloodline. The lilies were chosen by Earl Spencer, Diana’s brother. The lily was also sacred to Astarte, another Diana deity, and it was used to symbolise the impregnation of the virgin Mary. The ‘blessed virgin’ Juno, ruler of August, was said to have conceived her saviour-son, Mars, on a magic lily.

The lily is symbolic of the reptilian bloodlines. In the year 656, the 10th Council of Toledo officially made the day of Juno’s legendary conception of Mars into the Christian Festival of the Mother of God, or Lady Day, insisting that it commemorated Mary’s miraculous conception of Jesus with the aid of a lily.60 In France the people knew Lady Day as Notre Dame de Mars. The symbolism of the lily with the pregnant goddess giving birth to the saviour-god (as in Isis and Horus) is fascinating, given the stories that Diana was pregnant at the time of her death and the way I have connected this to the legend of Osiris, Isis and Horus.

There have also been questions about whether Diana is even buried on the island. In the Summer of 1998, the Star magazine in the United States quoted an unnamed “senior source” at Buckingham Palace as saying she was secretly cremated and according to a report in the Los Angeles Times some people in the village of Great Brington also don’t believe she is buried on the island. I know these reports are true from my own sources.


One resident quoted by the LA Times said that the night her coffin was taken to Althorp for burial, the village had been ‘invaded’ by the army, police and special forces units, and all the villagers were hustled into their homes. She said that the crematorium at the church was working late into the night. Betty Andrews, the former cook and housekeeper at Althorp, is quoted by Star magazine as saying:

“There’s a strange feeling amongst the villagers that we may not be hearing the complete picture”.

While researching this book I was introduced to Christine Fitzgerald, a brilliant and gifted healer, who was a close friend and confidant of Diana for nine years. Because of Christine’s understanding of the esoteric, Diana was able to talk to her about matters she would not dare to share with anyone else for fear of being dubbed crazy. It is clear that Diana knew about the true nature of the royal family’s genetic history and the reptilian control. Her nicknames for the Windsors were “the lizards” and “the reptiles” and she used to say in all seriousness: “They’re not human”. There is a very good reason for Diana using this description of the Windsors.


As her deprogramming continued, Arizona Wilder remembered clearly a ritual she attended at Clarence House, the Queen Mother’s home near to Buckingham Palace, in which Diana was shown who the Windsors really are. It took place in the first seven days of July 1981, just before Diana and Charles were married on the 29th.


This period is the last seven days of the cycle of the Oak Tree, according to esoteric law, and the ritual was called The Awakening of the Bride. This is a ritual for all females of the 13 bloodlines who are going to be in publicly high positions and marry reptilians to produce the new generation of rulers. Arizona says that the Queen Mother, the Queen, Prince Philip, Lady Fermoy, Diana’s father Earl Spencer, Prince Charles and Camilla Parker-Bowles were all present when Diana was brought into the room.


She was wearing a white gown and a drug had been administered by Lady Fermoy. Diana was told that she should consider her union with Prince Charles as only a means to produce heirs and nothing else. Camilla Parker-Bowles was his consort, not her. Arizona says that Prince Philip and the Queen Mother then shape-shifted into reptiles to show Diana who they really were. ‘Diana was terrified, but quiet’, she said. Diana was told that if she ever revealed the truth about them, she would be killed. (Remember the guy I mentioned who had a call from Diana in the March before she died asking for his advice on how to reveal information about the royals that would ‘shake the world’?)


The Queen Mother told Diana at the ritual that “all ears” would be listening to everything she said and “all eyes” would forever be watching her. This is the classic ‘nowhere to run’ bind imposed on all mind controlled slaves. Does anyone believe, therefore, that they would allow Diana into the clutches of Mohamed Al Fayed if he was not under their control? The ritual also involved the use of a golden penis (Osiris symbolism) which was used on Diana to signify the ‘opening of the womb’. Arizona says it was of reptilian shape and size and had needle-like protrusions designed to superficially puncture the walls of the vagina and cause bleeding.


Diana was told that after this ritual, she would never be “honoured” again by attending their rituals and she was not to ask questions about them. Now do people understand why Diana suffered from bulimia and serious emotional problems from the time she married Charles?

Diana told Christine Fitzgerald that the Queen Mother was the power behind the Windsors, along with Prince Philip. But Philip was subordinate in the hierarchy to the Queen Mother, Diana said. The Queen Mother is connected to a long list of Brotherhood groups and societies and she is the head of the Inner Temple, the elite and highly secret society for the upper levels of the legal profession on the ‘former’ Knights Templar land at Temple Bar in London.


It was the Queen Mother and her close friend, Diana’s grandmother, Ruth Lady Fermoy, who manipulated Diana into the marriage with Prince Charles. This is why Diana was given quarters at the Queen Mother’s home, Clarence House, in the weeks before the wedding and she left from there to marry Charles at St Paul’s Cathedral.

“Diana used to tell me that the Queen Mother was evil”, Christine Fitzgerald said, “She actually used that word, evil. She said she hated the Queen Mother and the Queen Mother hated her.”

Most people in Britain will be astonished to read this because the Queen Mother’s propaganda has turned her into the nation’s favourite grandmother. “Oh yes, the Queen Mum, such a lovely, gentle, kind old lady.” But this woman is not what she is claimed to be. I can’t emphasize that enough.


During her time at Clarence House before the wedding, Diana says herself that she was being given drugs like the anti-depressant, Valium, to treat her bulimia. And what else were they giving her? “They drugged her”, Christine said “I’m sure of it, they had her doped from the start.” Christine had many conversations with Diana and she opened her heart about her nightmare life with the Windsors.


But Christine’s contacts through her work have given her access to other sources with inside knowledge of the British Royal Family, too. This was the first time Christine Fitzgerald had talked publicly about her experiences with Diana and what she knows of the reptilian agenda.


She told me:


“The Queen Mother... now that’s a serious piece of wizardry. The Queen Mother is a lot older than people think. To be honest, the Royal Family hasn’t died for a long time, they have just metamorphosised. It’s sort of cloning, but in a different way. They take pieces of flesh and rebuild the body from one little bit. Because it’s lizard, because it’s cold-blooded, it’s much easier for them to do Frankenstein shit than it is for us. The different bodies are just different electrical vibrations and they have got that secret, they’ve got the secret of the micro-currents, it’s so micro, so specific, these radio waves that actually create the bodies. These are the energies I work with when I’m healing.


They know the vibration of life and because they are cold-blooded, they are reptiles, they have no wish to make the Earth the perfect harmony it could be, or to heal the Earth from the damage that’s been done. The Earth’s been attacked for zeons by different extraterrestrials. It’s been like a football for so long. This place was a bus stop for many different aliens. All these aliens, they could cope with everything, including the noxious gases.


They’re landing all the time and coming up from the bowels of the Earth. They looked like reptiles originally, but they look like us when they get out now through the electrical vibration, that life key I talked about. They can manifest how they want to. All the real knowledge has been taken out and shredded and put back in another way. The Queen Mother is “Chief Toad” of this part of Europe and they have people like her in each continent. Most people, the hangers on, don’t know, you know, about the reptiles. They are just in awe of these people because they are so powerful.

“Bal moral is a very, very nasty place. That’s somewhere they want to dig underground. They will find reptile fossils, it goes back that far. Don’t think of people like the Queen Mother and Queen Victoria, as different people. Think of them as the same person which after a while has had to replace their coat. When the flesh dies, that energy, while it’s dying, will be immediately up someone else’s jacksy (backside). It’s very vampire, worse than vampire.


They are not going to come to you with hooked teeth and suck you’re blood. Fear is their food, they can actually take fear and manifest it into a tangible thing. The key is the vibrational current. At that vibrational current, they can manifest anything from anything. Its like a holographic image. We are all minerals and water vibrating. This is all an illusion we are living in. That’s the secret. You know when the monarchy’s fallen, it’s not the end of it. They will manifest in another form. The reptiles have never been defeated and this is the closest they have come to it.


The reason they are so threatened today is because the Earth is in such trouble and the mental power of people is returning. This is their most frightening time, but this is not going to kill them. There are long centuries before it’s over yet. The difference this time is that it’ll be more difficult for them and they are going to have to settle for less and the Earth people are going to get more.


But even though these reptilian ones are fuckers, they are sad, pathetic beasts really, while humanity is galloping towards light. They’re just pathetic lumps of nastiness who aren’t going to win. I can’t talk about this everywhere because they would just go ‘Christine, get a white coat, put it on backwards, get out’. But I want an end to the bullshit.”


I was astonished to hear someone else talking about these subjects, which I knew from my own research to be true. She was not aware when she told me this of my own research into reptilians. Christine Fitzgerald, thanks to her insider contacts and her knowledge of metaphysics, had been able to grasp the biggest secret: that reptiles on another dimension are controlling the world by working through physical bodies which look human.


And also that the Windsors are one of these reptilian bloodlines. Christine also knew about the reptile Satanic rituals, the sexual rites and the widespread sacrifice of children. She said it is the pure essence of the pre-pubescent the reptiles want.

“If you looked at where all the castles are built and where there are a lot of street children in the Third World, they’re galloping it at the moment. They’re pulling the kids in en masse now.”

She said the reptiles want the children’s life essence because they can’t continue to manifest without that pure energy.

“The contaminated essence of us adults is not worth anything to them”, she said. “All the rituals, the knives, and sodomy, its that easy for these people to snatch a piece of your soul.”

Christine also spoke about the sex rituals and orgies involving the Windsors. The very word orgy comes from the Greek, orgia, meaning ‘secret worship’ and relates to the sexual rites of the ancient mystery religions. Christine said:

“There used to be an elect circle who took part in ritual orgies at Buckingham Palace. This was told to me by one of the participants. They were all couples. The lights used to go out at a certain time and they all swapped round and did their things. You know about the butler ringing the bell at six o’clock in the morning so that everyone goes back to their bed?


These people are nasty pieces of work, sweetheart, these people are nasty. Nothing you can think of can ever be as nasty as they really are. Diana used to say that if the world knew what they were really like, they wouldn’t want them, but I knew that. My chin was on the couch now, hearing about all these orgies at the palace. Just the laugh that these serious people who are going on like butter wouldn’t melt up their jacksy and they are carrying on like that.


But the sex thing is a big part of their rituals because it’s kundalini energy, see, which is the core, our generator. The orgies stopped because one of the couples died and they had an odd number and they didn’t want to bring in anyone else. So even that was ritual. Everything about them is ritual... all that heraldry, all that pomp and ceremony. Negative energy gets drawn to negative energy.”

Many of the Queen’s Ladies in Waiting have told Christine Fitzgerald about Prince Philip and his affairs.

“The royal family has got lots of black babies all over the world”, she says.

The recovered mind-slave Brice Taylor tells in her book, Thanks For The Memories, how she was forced to have sex with Philip and Charles. It is not without reason that the former British Intelligence officer, Peter Wright, said in his controversial book, Spycatcher, that “The palace had enjoyed several centuries of scandal burying.”


Christine said that another controversial book, The Royals, by the American author Kitty Kelly was true, but “She’s left out a lot of stuff, she’s been quite kind”. She’s not kidding as you will soon appreciate. Christine told me about other members of the royal clan including Prince Philip’s uncle, Lord Mountbatten, another Satanist. She said:

“Lord Mountbatten was a big shit, too. It was him who fucked up Charles and got him on the nasty road.”

So this is the family which hooked an unsuspecting 19-year-old and used her, in Diana’s words, as a “brood mare” to produce Windsor heirs with Spencer genes. But it was more than that. Much more.

Only a few weeks before this book went to press, and months after Christine gave me her information in England, I was contacted by a friend in the United States who was deprogramming a very high level mind controlled slave from Project Monarch. He believes her to be the highest ranked woman in the Satanic hierarchy in the United States and she was one of only three Mother Goddesses in the world. This is Arizona Wilder, formerly Jennifer Greene.


At the time my friend and Arizona had no idea what Christine Fitzgerald had said. Arizona had been programmed and trained since childhood to become a Mother Goddess who conducted Satanic rituals at the highest levels of the Brotherhood all over the world. She described to my friend the inside of many secret and underground facilities that he has personally seen. What she described was accurate every time. He also checked her story with other contacts and the truth of her memories was continually confirmed.


What she told my friend, and later told me on audio and video tape, supports the information supplied by other slaves and by Christine Fitzgerald about the Windsors and their true nature. Arizona said that she officiated at Satanic rituals at Glamis Castle in Tayside, Scotland, the childhood home of the Queen Mother, who still owns the property, and also at Balmoral, the Queen’s Scottish residence. The Brotherhood obsession with Scotland, she said, was because there are many entrances there into the inner-Earth where the physical reptilians live.


Glamis Castle is built on the site of an 11th century royal hunting lodge and the present building dates from around 1687. It is mentioned in the ‘Shakespeare’ story of Macbeth. Arizona said that the Queen, Prince Philip, Prince Charles and Princess Anne are present at the rituals and so is Charles’ girlfriend, Camilla Parker-Bowles. Doesn’t it all now start to make sense?

She said that during the sacrificial rituals the Queen wears a cloak of gold fabric inlaid with rubies and black onyx. The Queen and Charles have their own ritual goblets, inlaid with precious stones signifying their Illuminati-Brotherhood rank. The Mother Goddess says that the Queen makes cruel remarks about lesser initiates, but is afraid of the man code-named ‘Pindar’ (the Marquis de Libeaux) who is higher than her in the Satanic hierarchy.


This also supports a claim made to me by another recovered slave who said she had seen the Queen physically beaten by someone above her in Satanic rank. Pindar, apparently, bears a resemblance to Prince Charles and Arizona says that Pindar is Charles’ real father. She said that the sacrificial victims used in the rituals at Glamis Castle are mostly under five years of age and the ceremonies are guarded by members of Scotland’s Black Watch. She also confirmed that Lord Mountbatten was a paedophile and that the Windsors are reptilians in human form. Her interview with me was taped, as were the ones with Christine Fitzgerald, and copies are now at various addresses.


The video interview with Arizona is available and details are at the back of the book. I stress that this Mother Goddess had no idea what Christine Fitzgerald had told me and yet their statements match again and again. Arizona says that Diana definitely knew that the Windsors were shape-shifting reptilians and Diana’s comments to Christine Fitzgerald support this.


Apparently, reptilians have been seen to shape-shift during sleep. Here is a summary of just some of what Arizona said about the royal family:

  • The Queen Mother: She’s cold, cold, cold, a nasty person. None of her cohorts even trusted her. They have named an altar (mind control programme) after her. They call it the Black Queen. I have seen her sacrifice people. I remember her pushing a knife into someone s rectum the night that two boys were sacrificed. One was 13 and the other 18. You need to forget that the Queen Mother appears to be a frail old woman. When she shape-shifts into a reptilian she becomes very tall and strong. Some of them are so strong they can rip out a heart and they all grow by several feet when they shape-shift.” (Exactly what the lady who saw Edward Heath said, among many others.)

  • The Queen: “I have seen her sacrifice people and eat their flesh and drink their blood. One time she got so excited with blood lust that she didn’t cut the victim’s throat from left to right in the normal ritual, she just went crazy, stabbing and ripping at the flesh after she’d shape-shifted into a reptilian. When she shape-shifts she has a long reptile face, almost like a beak, and she’s an off-white colour. The Queen Mother looks basically the same, but there are differences. (This description fits many depictions of the gods and ‘bird gods’ of ancient Egypt and elsewhere.) She also has like bumps on her head and her eyes are very frightening. She’s very aggressive.”

  • Prince Charles: “I’ve seen him shap-shift into a reptilian and do all the things the Queen does. I have seen him sacrifice children. There is a lot of rivalry between them for who gets to eat what part of the body and who gets to absorb the victim’s last breath and steal their soul. I have also seen Andrew participate and I have seen Prince Philip and Charles’ sister (Anne) at the rituals, but they didn’t participate when I was there. When Andrew shape-shifts, he looks more like one of the lizards. The royals are some of the worst, OK, as far as enjoying the killing, enjoying the sacrifice, and eating the flesh, they’re some of the worst of all of them. They don’t care who sees them at the rituals, they are what they are, they show it outright. They don’t care if you see it. Who are you going to tell, who is going to believe you? They feel that it is their birth-right and they love it. They love it.”

Given the evidence I have presented in this chapter about the background to Diana’s murder, I was not surprised to hear this Mother Goddess recall the following about Mohamed Al Fayed:

“I saw Mohammed Al Fayed at a ritual at the Mothers of Darkness castle in Belgium in the 1980s. The Queen and the Queen Mother were also there. The Queen Mother was talking to him and he was looking around as if he didn’t believe this sort of thing went on. It was on December 24th at the ritual of the old king and the new king. They didn’t let him in to see the worst of it. It was kind of like, ‘let’s introduce him into this’.


But he would have seen a baby being born and introduced as the new king and the sacrifice of an old man. The Queen Mother was there, the Queen, Pindar, Rothschilds, a lot of people I don’t know and a guy named Tony Blair. He was being groomed because my understanding of it was that people are picked out and groomed for certain positions.


And to be considered for those positions you have to accept the reality and the necessity and the sovereignty of the Illuminati, and that the reptilians run the show. Tony Blair’s attitude was like ‘I belong here’. Dodi Fayed’s father seemed bothered by it, but not Tony Blair. I remember seeing him talking to the royals about something. I have seen Blair, Al Fayed and the Royal Family at rituals at Balmoral as well.”

Once you know this astonishing background, the why, who and how of Diana’s murder become crystal clear. They were all in it together and still are. Diana’s murder had been planned for a long time, probably from birth, and it was in the 1980s, around the time Al Fayed was at the Mother of Darkness castle with the royal family and Tony Blair, that the flaming torch symbol was placed on top of the Pont de L’Alma tunnel.


Arizona said that Diana was a product of the multiple personality disorder programme, which she said would have started before she was five. She said Diana was also three months pregnant when she died. Diana would probably not have known this, she said, because the techniques the Brotherhood use often mean that the women continue to menstruate for some months before they are officially confirmed to be pregnant.


Arizona said that when she, herself, was artificially impregnated in a mind controlled state with Pindar’s sperm, she menstruated for three months before she was told by a doctor that she was more than three months pregnant. It could have been Pindar’s child and not Dodi Fayed’s, Arizona suggested.

“That is a really powerful sacrifice” she said, “to sacrifice a pregnant woman”.

If Diana was, as appears highly likely, a product of the mind control programme, those who plotted her murder could have ensured all that they required to play out their ritual to perfection.


She would have accepted the invitation from Al Fayed at the right time, fallen for Dodi Fayed, agreed to go to Paris for the night and so on. She could also have been, like Arizona, impregnated artificially and have no recollection of it. Arizona says that she knows that Diana was impregnated with Pindar’s sperm in this way to conceive her son William, the blond-haired, blue-eyed baby born on the summer solstice. And she is in no doubt that Diana was a ‘multiple’.

As she said:

“The things that she did with her eyes, like the eye rolling, is very, very common in multiples. Sometimes she’d be very shy and then suddenly she’s blossoming and she’s really social. These are the different altars (programmes) coming out, someone’s shy, someone’s not shy, someone’s angry, someone’s not angry. Then there was the weight gain and the weight loss.


The bulimia and the cutting herself are all signs of a multiple. Some are told that if you feel bad about yourself or you remember something, cut yourself. To me it was real obvious with Diana. Someone with this stuff just doesn’t announce to the world that something’s wrong, They spend their lives trying to hide it. ‘I was out grocery shopping’, or ‘I was out clothes shopping’, ‘I was taking a walk’, whatever, but you weren’t.”

The recovered mind-slave Brice Taylor confirms that Diana was a ‘multiple’ in her book, Thanks For The Memories, and she says that William and Harry are also. I think Dodi was another, thus making it child’s play to make he and Diana ‘fall in love’. The symbolism of Osiris, Isis and Horus, in the Pont de UAlma tunnel that night was also confirmed by Arizona. “Diana was Isis, Dodi Fayed was Osiris, and the child was Horus.


I don’t think it symbolised the birth of a child so much as the birth of an age the Age of Horus which begins by the year 2,000. This means the New World Order, the Age of Horus, the terrible child.” She said that the foetus would have been divided among certain high ranking leaders of the Brotherhood/ Illuminati and consumed in ritual.


She said that from her long experience of the rituals, she was sure that parts of Diana’s body would have been consumed also. Again I ask, is her body even on the island at Althorp Park? It makes you wonder what Tony Blair and the Royals were doing when they came together at Balmoral immediately after Diana’s death.


Another part of the ritual was that Diana was blond-haired and blue-eyed. Cathy O’Brien is the same, so is Arizona although she had dyed her hair to break that spell when I met her. She said that even when the Elite sacrifice cats they are blond-haired and blue-eyed. There is something about that genetic structure which is fundamental to them and this is the blood they need to survive in this dimension. At least most of the Monarch slaves have blond hair and blue eyes. “There were no blue eyes on this planet until the extraterrestrials came”, Arizona said.

Diana told Christine Fitzgerald in 1989 that they were going to kill her:

“It sounded outlandish at the time”, Christine said, “because she had the boys and they were little and I thought, no, they need her to bring the boys up.”

But there were to be many indications that Diana was indeed in danger from the Windsors and the Brotherhood in general. In the late 1980s with her marriage nothing more than a public show, Diana was having a relationship with her personal detective, Barry Mannakee, but he died in a motorcycle ‘accident’ in 1988.


By 1990, with the Gulf War threatening, Diana was having a relationship with Captain James Hewitt. One day, about this time, she went rushing into Christine’s healing centre in London in a terrible state. Christine remembers:

“She was crying hysterically and I said ‘What’s the matter?’ You know it was dog’s died stuff, bottom lip out, full sob. She came galloping through the door. I gave her rescue remedy, clutched her, hugged her, calmed her down, and said now tell me what’s going on. ‘I can’t believe it, I can’t believe it, they killed him, they killed him’ she sobbed. I said: ‘Who did they kill?’


She told me about her affair with the detective (Barry Mannakee) and how he was decapitated on a motorbike and how she thought it was a terrible accident. But now she knows the Royal Family killed him because Prince Charles’ senior detective had just told her that if she didn’t cool it with Hewitt, the same would happen to him. He told her she should not think that she was indispensable, either.”

Officially, Barry Mannakee died in a ‘road crash’. How dangerous the roads seem to be if the royals don’t like you. Christine said that Diana was very much in love with Mannakee and she had visited his grave regularly. Diana had, apparently, been unaware of his death at the time until she was being driven with Prince Charles to the airport to fly to the Cannes Film Festival. He waited until she was about to get out of the car in front of waiting photographers and he said:

“Oh, by the way, I got word from the Protection Unit yesterday that poor Barry Mannakee was killed. Some sort of motorcycle accident. Terrible shame, isn’t it?”

Diana burst into tears, but Charles said sarcastically: “Let’s go darling, your press awaits you.”61 I would emphasize again that the confirmation that Mannakee was murdered, and the personal threat to Diana, came from Prince Charles’ senior detective, according to the Princess. Would he be making statements and threats to her like that without the approval of Prince Charles? Of course not. In 1998 in the Independent Television documentary, Diana - Secrets Of The Crash, James Hewitt said that he too had been warned to stop seeing Diana or the consequences would not be pleasant.


He said:

“The telephone calls were anonymous, but left me in no doubt that they knew what the situation was. They were threatening. They said it was not conducive to my health to continue the relationship.”

He said that other warnings came from Diana’s personal police protection officers, the Royal Household, and a member of the Royal Family, whom he would not name:

“The (member of the Royal Family) said your relationship is known about. It is not supported, we cannot be responsible for your safety and security, and suggest that you curtail it forthwith.”

James Hewitt was further quoted in the London Times about these threats and his comments supported completely the story Diana had told Christine Fitzgerald. Hewitt said that his clearest warning came when he was told that he would suffer the same fate as Barry Mannakee.62


Does anyone still believe that the Windsors and their networks were not involved in the murder of Princess Diana? Or that they had prior knowledge and played an active role in the decision to assassinate the mother of William and Harry?


According to reports in the United States, Susan Barrantes, the mother of Sarah ‘Fergie’ Ferguson, had been telling friends that she thought Diana had been murdered in the weeks before she was decapitated in a mysterious car crash in Argentina on September 19th 1998.63 Confidential mail for Diana was delivered to Christine Fitzgerald and this included packages from a former member of the elite SAS who was concerned for Diana’s safety.


He was warning her of what was going on behind her back.” Half of M16 were on Diana’s side too you know”, Christine said. One day a client, who had involvement with the security agencies, saw some of these packages being delivered. Christine described what followed:

“She said I’m really worried for you, you don’t know what you’re getting involved in here. Diana’s basically mad, she’ll drop you in it, she will hang you out to dry, you’ll end up dead, your kids will end up dead, your cats, your business will be ruined. I couldn’t believe how she was carrying on. She was so full of hate. Diana came in the next day and I gave her the mail. I said not everyone who bows to you has your best interests at heart. I told her what happened and she went purple with rage. When she died, everybody came in and said ‘They bumped her off didn’t they?’ But that client was the only one who was outraged at the suggestion. I was checked out by M16, my phones were tapped, my house was burgled, the royal family kept a big check on me while I was dealing with Diana.”

Christine and her contacts have no doubt about what happened in Paris:

“She was bumped off, she was left to die at the roadside. Those responsible were above the elite of the army”, she said.


“It was not the ‘secret squirrels’ (British Intelligence)”, she understands, “it was above that”.


She said that “Mohamed Al Fayed ‘in his tortured little sense’ wants to be part of the reptilian power because ‘he likes all that’.”

Christine believes that Diana’s romance with Dodi was engineered. She said:

“Diana fell in love quite easily and he’s a master of the smile. She was unfortunate in her love affairs because she rescued others in her own distress. So the men she went for were all emotional cripples because she was a healer, too. Most people who went with Diana used her and I think Dodi did also. He would have used her for his ego, the contacts, and his dad. The Royal Family killed her for her light energy, especially when she was pregnant. I don’t believe she was as badly injured as they say. If they checked her body they would see that the scar the surgeons made starts at her pubis and goes right up to her throat.


They’ve even taken her thymus gland, the way we make interstellar communication. I know from the best sources that she was pregnant and they took the baby. Pieces of that foetus will have been delivered everywhere. They can make babies from the cells. Parts of her body will have been used in their rituals as well. Diana was always having Kensington Palace swept for bugs, but they had Dodi bugged and they knew exactly what was going on. This was not the first time she thought she was pregnant and this nearly happened before, but she wasn’t pregnant. That was with Hewitt.”

Christine Fitzgerald shared the most intimate details of Diana’s life and knew her in ways, and at levels, that very few others did. The incredible revelations of the Windsors’ treatment of Diana over so many years, the threats made to her by Prince Charles’ personal detective, the ritual sacrifices and the confirmation that they were responsible for the murder of Barry Mannakee, cannot be allowed to pass by.


There must be a campaign to press the Windsors to face these matters and for Al Fayed, Trevor Rees-Jones, Earl Spencer, and the others I have named, to answer the questions that have to be addressed. Power must be stripped from the Windsors, their royal dynasty dismantled, and their crimes against humanity publicly exposed. More than that, however, those in the political, security, and medical professions, who are also involved, must be equally exposed.


The Royal Family, Earl Spencer, and the British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, have all dismissed claims that Diana was murdered and called for such suggestions to cease ‘for the sake of the boys’. The questions must not be allowed to be ignored or another Brotherhood assassination will have been achieved while those responsible go free. Earl Spencer went to the extent of issuing a statement on behalf of the Spencer family in February 1998 in which he asked:

“Is there any good in all this speculation? I ask that because there is clearly a lot of harm in it. All we, her family, ask is that Diana’s memory be respected, and that sensational speculation be left out of the public arena, where it undermines our aims to come to terms with her loss”.

When you see the evidence presented in this chapter while people like Earl Spencer and Tony Blair say there is no evidence of a conspiracy, what does that make you think? If Diana had been your sister would you not be determined to find out what happened? If you were Prime Minister when such a famous and much loved Princess had been killed, would you not insist that the truth be established? So why don’t they?


Diana’s relationship with her brother was less than harmonious to say the least. When you know the background, Earl Spencer’s famous speech at her funeral can be seen as a diatribe of hypocrisy So was his bitter condemnation of the media, in a statement after her death outside his home in Cape Town, a statement which, like Al Fayed’s, fueled the belief that the paparazzi were to blame for the crash.


Christine Fitzgerald said of him:

“Charles Spencer is a sh it, major sh it. He’s quite a spiteful little shit, too. When Diana was going through the trauma and really needed a new home, he said to her: ‘You’re not bringing your shit down to me and mine.’ He wouldn’t even give her one of the houses. He’s not a powerful man at all. He knows he’s sniffing around something dangerous and powerful and so he’s attracted to it. Satanism goes on on the Spencer estate. Diana knew about it.”

Diana had a profound affect on millions of people as we saw after her death and they did not know the half of what she had to suffer after the Windsors sank their fangs. In many ways Diana was a mirror of Marilyn Monroe, used by the establishment and then cast aside and murdered. Marilyn had affairs with President Kennedy and, it seems, his brother, Bobby, and when she became dangerous and surplus to requirements she was killed because of what she knew.


In another of those remarkable examples of synchronicity there are many ‘coincidences’ that connect her life and Diana’s. They were both born on the first of the month and died at the age of 36 in August. They both married on the 29th of the month to men twelve years older. Marilyn called herself the Queen of Diamonds and Diana the Queen of Hearts. And both were the subject of the Elton John song, Candle In The Wind, which he sang at Diana’s funeral. Since Christine Fitzgerald first spoke to me the threat to destroy her business has been implemented.


Suddenly the phone stopped ringing and when I met her again she was seeing as many clients in a week as she had been in a day. This is unexplainable when you consider she is one of Britain’s most gifted and effective healers working in the centre of London. Unexplainable, that is, unless you know the story. But she told me she is determined the truth shall be known, whatever the authorities seek to do to her:

“I don’t want a war, I just want an end to the bullshit”, as she puts it.

Looking back on Diana’s life and their conversations together, she says:

“Poor cow, she was in a house where no-one gave a damn and it’s a terrible state of affairs. She was all alone in a nest of vipers. I used to just patch her up. She just found me and just came to me. I made her wait for a fortnight until I checked it out. They used to say that I was giving her anger therapy. I didn’t. I used to just listen to her, take it all in, and think Jesus Christ! But I didn’t think they would kill her. I can’t believe that this information is so close to home and yet they are still managing to keep it at bay. My room is the truth room and its a real place of safety and I don’t judge anyone on their shit, and that’s why I haven’t spoken about any of this in the past. She was as screwed up as anyone, you know, and if you are going to tell the truth, you have to tell the whole truth. She wasn’t crazy, she was mentally and physically abused, I feel, from a little girl. Her father was a nasty piece of work and her stepmother (Raine), too.

“The Royal Family were very afraid. She would have taken the public away from them, she would have taken the world from them gradually. They recognized her worth and fed off her in a psychic vampire way for a long time. All she wanted was to get married and have children you know, bless her little heart. She wanted to live out what she had never had. The world would have come to rights with Diana because, as fucked up as she was, she was a light being and wherever she went she manifested love. It was amazing. The sad thing was that she didn’t know she was doing that and she needed proof of her worth and she was looking in the wrong quarters for that. But when she tried to break away, we went out and did normal things. She did kung fu with my husband for five years. She wanted to be normal, to link arms and walk down the street. She knew where her heart lay. She really and truly did amazing things.”

Diana said she could not believe how cold the Windsors were and the public had a graphic example of this in the days after her death. They stayed out of sight at Balmoral in Scotland while the people mourned Diana in their tens of millions with an unprecedented explosion of grief. Only pressure from the public through the media forced the Queen, kicking and screaming, to make a cold, emotionless and pathetic ‘tribute’ to Diana on television the night before the funeral.


Cold is a word constantly used about the Queen, Philip, and Charles, and that’s the mental and emotional profile of the Brotherhood and its networks.


Bill Cooper said that the initiates that he met in his work for US Naval Intelligence had “No conscience, no morals, no regrets, no feelings, no emotion”. This is precisely the same character profile as the Windsors and, according to all the people I have met who have encountered them, the character profile of the reptilians of the lower fourth dimension. There is a reason for that, of course.

The people have been hoodwinked for thousands of years. Hoodwinked about their history, hoodwinked about who they really are and the true nature of life. Hoodwinked about the true background and Agenda of those they have allowed to rule them. How apt, therefore, that this word should also derive from Freemasonry. Dr. Albert MacKey, the 33rd degree Freemason and foremost Freemason historian of the 19th century, defined the term ‘hoodwinked’ in his Encyclopaedia of Freemasonry as: A symbol of secrecy, silence and darkness, in which the mysteries of our art should be preserved from the unhallowed gaze of the profane.

The human race has indeed been hoodwinked.


1 The Top 13 llluminati Bloodlines, p 89.
2 Ibid, p 90.
3 Ibid.
4 Ibid.
5 Ibid.
6 Ibid, p 91-2.
7 Ibid, p 89.
8 Ibid.
9 Secret And Suppressed, p 66.
10 Ibid.
11 Ibid, p 68.
12 The Top 13 llluminati Bloodlines, p 94.
13 Secret And Suppressed, p 80.
14 The Top 13 llluminati Bloodlines, p 99.
15 Ibid, p 102.
16 Secret And Suppressed, pp 19, 65, 85.
17 Ibid, p 66.
18 Ibid.
19 Ibid, p 65
20 Ibid,p69.
21 Andrew Morton, Diana, Her True Story (Michael O’Mara Books, London, 1992, republished as
Diana: Her True Story In Her Own Words, 1997).
22 Ibid.
23 Ibid.
24 The London Daily Mail, Thursday, August 27th 1998.
25 Ibid.
26 Diana: Her True Story
27 Ibid.
28 Ibid.
29 Private Eye magazine, No 956, Friday, August 7th 1998, p 5.
30 Tom Bower, Fayed, The Unauthodsed Biography (Macmillan, London, 1998).
31 Ibid, p 22.
32 The London Daily Mail, Friday, June 26th 1998.
33 Simon Reagan, Who Killed Diana? (a Scallywag publication, Amsterdam, 1998), p 57.
34 Ibid, p 62.
35 The News Of The World, Sunday, January 18th 1998, pp 18, 19.
36 Peter Hounam and Derek McAdam, Who Killed Diana?, p 17.
37 Dispatches, Channel Four, June 1998.
38 Ibid.
39 Ibid.
40 Fayed, The Unauthorised Biography, p 425.
41 Ibid, p 420.
42 Ibid, p 421.
43 Peter Hounam and Derek McAdam, Who Killed Diana?, p 64.
44 Ibid, pp 73, 74.
45 Jim Marrs, Crossfire: The Plot That Killed Kennedy (Carrol and Graf Publishers, New York, 1989), p 382.
46 Dispatches.
47 Diana - Secrets Of The Crash, Imi, 1998.
48 “Diana, the Unsolved Mystery”, News Of The World News Special, January 18th 1998.
49 The information about David Sands death comes from the Tony Collins book, Open Verdict, an account of 25 mysterious deaths in the defence industry (Sphere Books, London, 1990).
50 Sir Peter Horsley, Sounds From Another Room (Leo Cooper, England, 1997). The story is also told by Peter Hounam and Derek McAdam in Who Killed Diana?, pp 126-133.
51 Peter Hounam and Derek McAdam, Who Killed Diana? (Vision Paperbacks, London, 1999), pp 175-177.
52 The News Of The World, News Special, January 18th 1998.
53 Daily Mirror, Monday, March 2nd 1998, p 2.
54 London Daily Mail, August 29th 1998, pp 1, 2.
55 Dispatches.
56 Peter Hounam and Derek McAdam, Who Killed Diana?, p 145.
57 Quoted in Blasphemous Rumours, p 212.
58 The Phoenician Origin Of Britons, p 64.
59 “Fayed’s rooftop flame of love for Dodi and Diana”, London Daily Express, Friday, July 24th 1998, p 3.
60 The Women’s Encyclopaedia Of Myths And Secrets, p 543.
61 Kitty Kelly, The Royals (Warner Books, New York, 1997), p 347
62 The Times, Wednesday, June 3rd 1998.
63 “Fergie’s Mom Was Murdered”, The Globe, October 6th 1988.

Back to Contents


Back to The Black Nobility


Back to The United Kingdom and Brexit