From a lecture presented by
Sir Laurence Gardner, Kt St Gm, KCD
History is not the event, history
is the record of the event. History is written for all sorts of reasons, but
itís generally written by itís winners. And as with all things, the story of
yesterday as today, we are told what weíre supposed to know and we learn it
in the way that weíre supposed to learn it.
Those of you who did hear my earlier talks will know that the book is about the Messianic Bloodline, which descended from Jesus Christ to the present day. It was concerned with, and IS concerned with, comparing the new Testament Gospels, with the original first hand accounts of the period, whether they be the Jewish records or the Roman chronicles as well.
So this is the first
lesson to learn in history, that for the most part the people who knew more
about what they were talking about, were the people who were there at the
time, not those who decided to interpret it 1500 years later!
had molded itself around a certain field of vested interest, most of which
was to suppress the female in the church establishment so that the Church
reigned supreme for so many 100ís of years, also in society as a whole. What
we find when we look at the original text of the era, is quite a different
story from what we know today. Doctrines such as Jesus was born of a virgin,
that he was the one and only son of God, such things as these do not feature
at all in the documents of the era.
And that is,
It canít be special simply because it
came from King David. It clearly isnít special because it came from Jesus,
because before that, it did come from King David. The new testament tells us
that it did.
these records are still held, they werenít destroyed as they were supposed
to be. So the question is simply, what was so important about the bloodline,
what made King David so important in the first place? And it was this trail
I was lead on. For in the next book, Iím probably about half way through it
now. Iím not going to start the story from the very beginning of it because,
what Iím here to talk to you today, is just that one aspect of it.
From whose third son, Seth, evolved a line which
progressed through to Noah. It relates to Abraham, who became the great
Patriarch of the Hebrew nation. It relates to Abraham who brought his family
out of Mesopotamia, into Canaan, and the descendants then moved into
whose descendants stayed there for awhile, then came back to the land of
Canaan, and so the story progresses.
version that we have, maybe just like the Christian story was adapted to
suit the Jewish faith, rather than to suit historical fact. So, in
consideration of this, I was reminded of exactly what had happened with my
previous book, with the New Testament story, the gospels that had been in
the public domain for centuries bare little relation to the first hand
accounts of the period.
So in this regard itís interesting to note that although the New Testament was put together only 1600 years ago, the Old Testament, the one that tells the stories from before, is actually 400 years younger than that. With what little that we know, itís based on Hebrew texts from the 10th Century, just a 150 years before William the Conqueror invaded England. So this is hardly first hand accounts of anything. So, I had to get back to the old writings once again, and this time weíre really looking at "old" writings.
problem was that even if they proved to be available, the original Hebrew
text that were rehashed centuries later were themselves only written between
the 6th and the 1st century BC. So it wasnít actually likely, that even
"they" were going to be that authentic in their telling of history of
thousand and thousands of years before.
So, it was apparent that Babylon in the 6th century BC were where the records will be held that gave the writers the information from which to put together the Old Testament. From the time of Abraham, back to Adam we have nineteen generations in the Bible, and it will appear that the whole of the story of those nineteen generations were all Mesopotamian. It was all Iraqi history.
The interesting thing that I found, was that when getting facts in old
Babylonian records, there was a great track of Southern Iraq bordering the
Persian gulf in a land that they called Sumer, which actually, in the old
documents, is referred to as "the eden", not the garden of eden, simply
the eden, and the Eden meant in the language of the day,
pasture land, a grazing
So I looked for the books that were there but were never included, it was pretty easy to find.
Books of Enoch and, most books and text are available,
theyíre just not
in the bible. A further book which Iíd known about for some time, because I
found in Bloodline, was the book of Jasher. Another very important book, it
was so important that twice in the Old Testament our attention is drawn to
the great importance of the book of Jasher. Itís not there... Itís very
important but they missed it out! That book is still readily available
What on earth were they, did they exist?
Well in fact, remnants
of them do exist. What transpired upon pursuing remnants of these books and
indeed the very substance of the Babylonian and Mesopotamian records that
were put together for the Old Testament, was that the answer, to one
question became very clear indeed.
Well looking at the old records, looking
at the remnants of these two books that were mentioned, we suddenly discover
why they werenít included in the Old Testament.
He calls him El Shaddai.
Suddenly, Jehovah has disappeared, and we have this other person.
actually refers to and means "Lofty Mountain", maybe "Lord of the Mountain",
or "Ruler of the Mountain". Whatever the words... a Mountain God.
That was when Moses actually asked him who he was. Now, that leads one
to wonder, because why would Moses have had to ask him who he was? It would
have been pretty clear that God was God, but Moses wasnít sure. He was
really saying, really saying (laughing), which one have I got here
(laughing)? So, not wishing to give the game away, he didnít really admit to
too much. He simply said "I Am That I Am" and anyone of us can say that it
means very little.
They mean exactly the same thing. Elyon means "Mountain Lord", and Baal means "Lord", means "Adoni".
Two characters still,
the definitions of God and Lord has ended up in the Old Testament being
mixed together throughout, as if weíve got one character in this story...
and it turns out to be totally wrong. It is a complete concoction of two
completely different characters merged into one figure. Hence, the different
personalities. One was a vengeful god and people hater, the records are very
clear in this regard. The other, was a social god, a people supporter. They
each had wives, they each had sons and daughters.
All of the early stories tell of them trying to support the Adoni, the Lord. And in every step and turn of the way, the Jehovah, the storm god, retaliated with floods, and famines, and destruction, and just about everything that could be put in the way of these people, who were trying to follow the other God. Even at the very last, at about 600 BC, the Bible explains that Jerusalem was overturned by invasion, strictly at Jehovahís bidding.
And Jews in their 10ís of 1000ís were taken
into captivity, simply because, and it is the only reason given for all of
that, the Israelites had erected a Temple to the Lord Baal. What we have is
vengeance once again.
The Christians, then in a vague replication of that, eventually take
on the epitome of the same god. It doesnít call him Jehovah,
it simply calls
him God, which is pretty inspirational (laughing). And itís at that time,
that we suddenly find that Baal and Adoni and these other names disappear.
Theyíre not being followed anymore. What we now have, from that moment in
time, weíve now moved forward into the current common era, to faiths of
We canít mix up, in the old books, the name Jehovah
with the name Lord. If one now reads the Old Testament with that in mind,
not the English version, the Jewish translated version of the Old Testament,
then just supplements the names each time. We suddenly find, that every time
that something nasty happens its Jehovah, and every time something nice
happens itís this guy they call the Lord. Itís not the same fellow.
We can find the first clue in
documents that were discovered in 1929, in Syria, and these documents
actually tell us that the two gods have their joint seat in Southern Iraq.
Weíre in the land that was then called Sumer. What did these people call the
same gods, can we find replications of the stories? So that we know weíre
actually talking about the same gods, and can we find the stories turning up
in exactly the same way, with the same gods?
A very important word. The text informs us that it was Enlil that brought the flood, that it was Enlil that destroyed Babylon, that
it was Enlil who constantly opposed the education and enlightenment of
He sets up the escape strategy during the great flood. He passed over the time honored "Tablets of Destiny" and the "Tablets of Scientific Law", the bedrock of the early mystery schools. So, this establishes a scene, it is somewhere for us begin. What we know is that history, isnít always history as we perceive it.
We have to get back to the oldest records and generally
it doesnít matter what century. When we look at the original story, written
down by the people closest to the event, it is different and probably stands
more chance of being correct. Without being a time traveler with a video
recorder, we canít prove anything, but we can trust their writings, better
than we can trust the 10th Century Interpretation of them.
As far as I could determine, and Iím looking for a route to a
specialty in the bloodline here, it seems very, very, apparent that
everything that we had read in the text at that point, that whenever one was
talking about this particular bloodline, the bloodline that came down to David, and eventually to Jesus. It had something rather strange and rather
different about itís dietary structure, there was clearly a line being built
up. A line being purposefully contrived for some reason or purpose,
Considering all my years of involvement, Iíd never heard of them, and they were called "The Imperial Court of the Dragon Sovereignty".
The only thing that I knew about
them, was that they had existed a few 100 years ago and I knew that they
were said to be in Hungary.
The early schools in ancient Egypt from the time of 1450
BC, and we know then, that there were scientific academies, that had
apparently great secrets. What weíre not told, is that the mystery schools,
were actually schools founded by the priests of Ra in about 2200 BC. And the
senior of these mystery schools, was called "The Sovereign Court of the
Dragon". We actually have here, the oldest single scientific mystery school
in the world.
Thatís where Messiah comes from, it comes from the ancient holy
crocodile. So, when one talks about Jesus the Messiah, we actually have a
lot of anomaly there. Because heís not "THE" Messiah,
heís one of a whole
succession of Messiahís. These are pretty important people, that have been
looked after by a Court of High Priests, people looking after the Bloodline.
They appointed a head Dragon, a head Messiah, the
King of Kings, and the name in Celtic terms became, "Pen Dragon". So, weíre
beginning to see the names creeping in here, of all the stuff we know about
in Arthurian Lore, and the Royal Kingdoms. This started way way back. Weíre
suddenly in 2000 BC. Weíre now going to move back into 3000 and 4000 BC,
when we find these same titles being used: Dragons &
Messiahs, all the time.
Not many of us think about it, do we? Kings are Kings, Queens are Queens, and it doesnít mean a lot, thatís what they are. The name goes back to the very, very, earliest time. The records show that the central "G" in the word Kingship, or the G on the end of King, is just a latterly western addition, for the sake of making it easier to say, for the sake of another word. Because the word Kingship is absolutely identical with the word Kinship. It means, blood relative.
A King is a blood relative and thatís all
it means. In itís original form, however, itís spelt differently. We havenít
got Kingship or Kinship we have "CAINSHIP". And the first
King of the Dragon
Messianic succession is recorded in the documents of the order, from 2200
BC, to be the "Biblical Cain". Well, he isnít actually terribly important in
the story is he? Apart from killing his brother Able and disappearing from
sight, he turns out to be the founder of the greatest Sovereign line in
The line from Seth, the third son of Adam and Eve, turned out not to be the important person in this aspect at all. The important person is the guy that gets shunned and pushed aside, the first son of Eve. Whose name weíre told is Cain, in fact the records tell us that he was "The Cain", "The King".
the first earthly High King of an area called Kish, which sits pretty near
Babylon in Iraq. So, two more things suddenly come to light, The more you
start looking the more it begins to leap out from pages, just as it did with
the New Testament stuff. Because the stories that we know, that weíre taught
in our school rooms and our pulpits are about Cain and Able, The two sons of
Adam and Eve, and Cain slew Able.
Did the original text say that, that he was a tiller of the ground? Well, not quite, what they actually say, is that Cain had dominion over the "Earth" (laughing). Well, itís not quite the same is it? In fact, the bible translating seems to have continually had a problem in translating the effective word for "Earth". They translated it to ground, to clay, to soil, to dust, into all sorts of things. Except, what they should have translated it to "The Earth", not that earth, "The Earth".
Everytime the word is mentioned to be translated, they are referring to "The
Earth". Even in the case of Adam and Eve, the translators get it wrong. The
Bible says "Male and Female, he created them and he called them Adam". The
older records use the term Adama, which means "of Earth". It did not mean
they were made of dirt or clay or dust. It says, exactly as the Hebrew Bible
says, clearly for us to understand, they were of "The Earth". They were
There is a hell of a lot, and people here have probably read Sitchin and others, there has been a lot written about the sort of genetic engineering that went on at that time.
About how characters of that era may have ended up being called Adam and Eve, or whatever. Or clinically cloned in some regard. Iím not actually going to dwell on that tonight, itís a part of my book. And I actually go much more fully into it than Sitchin and others. What I really want to do, is cut to the chase and get onto the story of the Bloodline.
So, we need to
take that as read, that the "Adam & Eve" figures were the first of
something. We know they were the first of something, it tells us they were.
The Sumerian records itself tells us that they were the first of something
which they called the "Branches". And the word branches, the word for
Branches is clones. Spelt just like it is today, it means branches. So,
Adamís not the first man on earth. Heís the first kind of a specifically
devised strain of being. And his surrogate mother is actually named in the
records of Iraq, and sheís called Ninkhursag. It means "Lady of Life", and
"Lady of the Embryo".
Weíre building up a Kingly line here right from the
start. It was because of Ninkhursag, the "Lady of Life", that
Eve or Ava was
subsequently given the same name by the Hebrews. "Lady of Life", it said in
the text that Eve actually means "life", so thatís where the title comes
from. It comes from the Goddess who was the "Lady of Life".
the most simple of all sovereign devices. It is simply, and the early Hebrew
records tell us this, the Mesopotamian records tell us this, and they all
tell us the same symbol. It is very simply an upright red cross within a
circle. A very familiar image. A red cross in a circle, itís called
The Grail is a Chalice or a bloodline, or whatever we spoke about in our previous talks. Well, itís rather odd because this emblem, although its a cross within a circle, is defined as the "Dew Cup". The "Cup of the Waters". This is rather interesting, because when one gets into grail lore in medieval times, we always have "Ladies of the Waters", "Ladies of the Fountains". Waterís terribly important here in this early sovereign history.
The "Mark of Cain" is the "Dew Cup", the "Cup of the Waters", which in the
roman language was called Rosecruxious, Rose Dew,
Cruxious Cup, Rosecruxions,
from whence comes Roseicruxions, the dew cup.
It names his son in the bible, Enoch. Other records, name his son Atun. The Sumerian records tell us that Atun was the successor of Cain. Thatís the reason why heís not mentioned in the bible, only, Enoch. Atun was the successor. Atun was the next High King of Kish. So, weíre now beginning not only a royal bloodline, but weíre beginning to see the very first kingly dynasty on earth. Kings, earthly Adamas, highly bred people, meant to be leaders among human kind.
keep seeing them being referred to as the fruit and the branches of the
vine. But there is something even more strange here, because Eve is also
called the "Lady of the Rib" as well. We kept getting told how
was taken from his side, and she was made from his "Rib". Well, thatís an
odd one, because the "Lady of Life" in Sumerian, the word "Lady of Life" was
Ninti. There is nothing in the ancient records that tells us anything about
Adamsí "Rib", or anything of this sort of stuff.
Those who have
read books about ancient Sumer and the gods at the time, will know that the
great pantheon of the era were called the Anunnaki. These were the gods at
the time. In Canan they called them, "Eloheim". In fact, the "Court of the Elohim", the "Court of the Anunnaki" and the "Grand Assembly",
mentioned in the bible. It was looking at Psalm 82, we discover Jehovah
actually making an appearance in "Court" before the other gods, and trying
to claim supremacy. So, even the bible tells us that he wasnít the only one.
And a son thatís turns out to be, according to the records, at least "3/4 Anunnaki", the other man who is very much approaching a god figure himself. The records actually say that Cainís blood was so advanced, that his brother Abelís blood was earthbound by comparison. Thatís what the records say!!!
His blood was so advanced. What does our Bible say? Cain rose up against
Able, and spilled his blood on the ground (laughing). It actually comes from
the translation of "rose up", Cain rose so high above Able weíre told. So,
weíre told he rose up against Able and spilled his blood on the ground. This
is not what the records say at all. There is no story anywhere, outside of
our bible teaching, that indicates that, whatsoever.
The grant of arms, which denoted the messianic bloodline for all time. Today as then. The Sumerians refer to this insignia as the Gra-al, familiar isnít it, Grail when you put it together, "The Holy Grail", The bible calls it the "Mark of Cain". The mark has been portrayed to us, by the church, as if it was some sort of a curse. The Lord thrust the mark upon Cain, but why did he do it? It said, he did it to save him being killed by his enemies. At that moment in time, weíre supposed to believe that Cain had killed Able, and apart from his mother thereís nobody else on earth anyway.
But, Cain has a mark on his head to protect him
from his enemies... "What Enemies???"
Special, contrived to be of a particular kind. KLONE in the old spelling. So, by virtue of this contrived breeding, what we have is a specifically modeled succession beginning to buildup in history. A succession which judging by their military prose, judging by their political influence, judging by their leadership of the great assemblies, seem to have had a much more heightened awareness to it all.
It was recognized at the time however, that there was more to it than
just producing a line and dealing with its diet and itís general health.
What they do seem to know about, and they make a very deep thing about it.
They donít call it the same thing, but it would be what we call today DNA.
So, in fact every time, the line got
stronger and stronger and stronger. Through kingship it was maintained, that
"Cainship" was inherited through the mother.
happened I wonder, along the way, what happened to change the course of
events? What happened in "Jewish Law" or in Jewish custom to make them have
to knock this early part of history on the head?
This edict becomes expressly important to "Jewish
Law" and the Jewish way of life. Why does Jehovah suddenly become, in that
moment in time, obsessed with what to us seems to us like the intaking of
blood in some form or other? Whatís the problem here? Itís a customary
Jewish practice now, to hang meant for bloodletting, before cooking and
consuming it. Whatís odd, is that in the Christian religion,
The Christians pretend to, the blood, the messianic line, this is my blood,
the blood of Jesus, the drinking of the wine. So, could it be, one wonders,
that this Christian tradition was actually more right than the Jewish
tradition in terms of old law. Maybe, the Christian tradition of pretending
to drink blood is a throw back, a real throw back, to some really ancient
custom. Before the days of Noah. Could that be?
But, red crosses in
circles were always tied up with this particular ritual, the "Cup of the
Water", the "Rosicrucians". However, itís always a cup, itís always a
chalice thatís involved. And from Bloodline of the Holy Grail, what we
learnt through our investigations, was that the "Chalice" was the ultimate,
ultimate, symbol of the female.
That is linked to the fact that Kingship is only
obtainable, through the gene of the female, had something to do with
menstrual blood? Is this the important factor here? Well, thatís a bit hard
to take when you think about it first off. But, the more you look, the more
you find,. And you only have to look at the "Dragon Court"
2200BC, and you find yes, this is exactly what weíre looking at.
Can you, actually, tell me what the ingredients are for this or
for this? And they told me a few of these things, and suddenly, "Star Fire"
seemed a pretty good bet. It was not so frightening after all. We are
actually in the habit of taking some very, very, strange stuff, without
knowing it, because it looks like a little white pill.
But, all the time weíre talking about genes,
genetic construction, & DNA. They tell us that
Enkersake, the "Lady of Life"
was also known in Egypt as "Isis", the great mother. The model for the
virgin mother with the child, the child Horus. "Isis", is the great mother.
The Greeks called it Genisis. It was
originally a split word. And in the earliest versions, that I can find, it
is "Gene Isis". The word for in the beginning, in Jewish, was quite
different. The bible begins with it. Itís not Genesis, itís quite a
different word. So, before looking for this "Star Fire" practice in detail,
which we shall, we must now remind ourselves that it was actually Jehovah,
Enlil, that gave the instruction that blood must not be taken. And he gave
it to Noah, and the sons of Noah, who were members of this Kingly line.
Whatís so special about this food that is not used, & ends up being menstrual blood. It holds, they said, the greatest of all bodily secretions from certain glands. The pineal gland, the pituitary gland.
Certain parts of our brain functions, that gives us specific levels of awareness and intellect.
All of the things that the
kingly line needed. What was actually happening, was that instead of them
relying solely on their own glandular productions, of secretions and
hormones, they were being fed with an enhancement for this. Just like we
take other bodily supplements today, but they were taking them at a very,
very, advanced level. Because this was not earthly stuff, this was, "Anunnaki".
"Star Fire", straight from the Goddesses.
anti-aging properties. Well, they were actually using this, and they were
"really making good use" of it. They were making sure that the Kings lived
for a very, very long time.
The great ages in the line, continue way past Noah, for a few generations. And, not until we get to the time of Abraham, and beyond that, suddenly the life patterns begin to change in the line. The ages begin to become more normal. Isaac lived for 110 years, and weíre gradually coming down the tree. And, soon to the people living 70 years and 80 years, pretty ordinary sort of life spans.
So, what we can judge by this,
that we have actually hit it on the head, that itís around Abrahamís time,
not Noahís time that they became to take notice of "thou shalt not take the
So, why is it still
special when it gets to David? Well, perhaps it went somewhere else and then
came back. And, it actually did! It transpires that from exactly that strain
from Noah, before the time of Abraham, the line had already branched out. To
become the early Kings and Pharaohs of Egypt. When one looks at their life
spans again, they seem to go on for a very, very long time. In fact, some of
them go on for so long that there are no records of deaths. And, certainly
no evidence of any tombs. Goodness knows what happened to them, they simply
Vampires in the Bible ?
The great sea serpent of the "Merovingians", of the Fisher Kings in France, and it is the emblem of most of the Royal families today.
Somewhere on their coats of Arms, the "Dragon", "Draco". "Draco" is identical, as a "Dragon" was a serpent because there is little relation between these fire breathing dragons that we see in nursery rhymes. The "Dragon" was originally more like a crocodile. It was a four legged rather large snouted serpent. "Serpent" and "Dragon" were absolutely identical. And, it didnít really matter which word was used, it meant the same thing.
The "Dragon", the "Holy Crocodile",
the "Mesa", the "Messiah".
Everytime we see the word "Serpent" in the bible, when we look
back at the original Hebrew writings to see what it was translated from, it
was translated from something like Nhsh. The word meant to decipher, it
meant to find, to meant to find out. It had nothing whatever to do with
snakes. The "Dragon" was always "thee", who held the knowledge. He, whom
from which one found out. He, whom could divine. And, that is the root of
why we call gods and deities, "Divine".
Serpents, from that time on, until today, are always, always associated with wisdom and knowledge. Theyíre not evil. Theyíve never been evil in any law, except Christian and latter day Jewish law. They were wisdom. They were healing. They were knowledge. Itís interesting to discover, once one starts to look, how often serpents and dragons appear in mottos of healing institutions today. The American Medical Associationís emblem, is actually the "Plant of Life", the "Tree". The "Staff" with a winding "Serpent" around it.
Once one looks a little further into that, it
gets more interesting to see that there are more complex medical devices
using serpents. The one that we actually know, perhaps, is the "Winged
Producers of Hermes", with the two coiling serpents around it. This,
actually, is not just the emblem of medical associations world wide today.
It was, actually, one of the earliest symbols of the early "Dragon Court".
It was the emblem of the Essene therapeutic centre at Qumram, at the time of
Jesus. And the records tell us exactly what it is.
This was the order of the "Swan", that great "Grail Knights"
belong to. And, it is still a flourishing knightly order today. It is a
Knightly order for those still partaking of the equivalent, in todayís
terms, of "Star Fire".
The gland is small, itís tiny. It sits between the two left and right sides of the brain, it doesnít form part of the brain matter, but itís part of it, itís central. itís called the third eye sometimes. What it does, is to produce the hormones, the secretion that gives many of the qualities that weíre, actually & purposely, fed back into this bloodline. Melatonine produces serotonin, all important for longevity. All important for intuition. Important for awareness. Important for just about every aspect of supreme and superior leadership. They were called, even then, people of the "Swan". They were also "Serpents", they were also "Dragons", they were called "Kings of the Gra-il", & "Grail Dew Cup".
And itís why this mythology
creeps on, even to modern times. We can get into the middle ages, we can get
into Arthurian Lore. All the time we have "Chalices", we have "Ladies of the
Fountain", "Ladies of the Waters". We have "Dragons", we have "Pen Dragons".
All of these names crop up. And, these names exist in one form or another,
going back for 5000 years.
They actually explain that the priests of Anu, who was the father of "Enki and Enlil", the priests of Anu perfected and elaborated, medical science of living substances. And, it tells us that the most important of these, for the treatment of just about anything, was menstrual "Star Fire" from the "Anunnaki" goddess. They called it the "Gold of the Gods".
It was used as medicine, but it was fed daily and regularly to the
kings of the succession. In Egypt and Mediterranean times, we discover that
the ritual progresses. This is beyond the days of "Anunnaki" now.
Egyptian name, it was an Asian name. But, it was called "Ritu". "Ritu" was
the "Gold of the Gods". "Ritu" is the word from which we actually get red,
and ritual and indeed root. And, red "Ritu", was defined as "Red Gold of the
Golden Star Fire". So, suddenly weíre beginning to get something new
the first things that we see, is that Red is also synonymous with Black. Iím
not quire sure why, but whenever Black is mentioned it means the same as
Red. And, whenever Red is mentioned, it means the same as Black.
It produces hormonal secretions. Who were the people
who knew about these secretions? They were the people who knew the "secret-tions".
Thatís where the word "Secret" comes from. It comes from the early priests,
the "Temples of the Dragon Courts", who kept the Secret. The secretions, and
this was one of the key secrets really of the early mystery schools, was the
upholding of the upholding of the "Star Fire" ritual. It is one of the
secrets that Freemasonry says has been lost.
The Germans, as did
other Saxton countries, had a word "Hores". Who was actually turned into
"Whores". All the same things, and every one of those words translated back
to the same thing "dearly beloved one" (laughing).... There is no connection
whatever, and really, the good dictionary, still tells us this. If, we take
a look, there is no, not even the slightest vestige of similarity between
the word "Whore" and "Harlot", and say, prostitutes. They are not linked in
any way. All words tell us what they mean. And, the words mean, "Dear
Beloved One". "Scarlet Women", sacred priestesses of the "Star Fire".
The one thing in the Jewish faith, as in the Christian faith, that was absolutely predominant was that anything of importance, with the female had to go. Got to go... this is male stuff now. So, it gets lost. Not because itís necessary, has to go because suddenly history has become Religion. Not just religion, but a faith of fear. A religion based on venerating a guy who will bring floods and famine and destruction, if you donít do as youíre told, or so they thought.
The "Rosicrucians" the "Dew
Cup", the mark of the later "Rosicrucians", is all based upon the "Star Fire
Ritual". It is why the Christian church without knowing it, takes us through
a ceremony that it doesnít understand when it pretends to drink blood from
the "Chalice" (laughing). There are all sorts of names, it was "Nectars of
the Gods". It was "Gold of the Gods". It was also called, the
The "Star Fire", is about the acquisition of ability to have special
knowledge and wisdom. This is the light, this is the "Star Fire", this is
the roots of it. And, this has gone, it has been taken away. We are looking
for it. The light, it is said, exists in everybody. You simply have to be
awakened. There are various ways of awakening it. But, the natural way, we
are told, in the oldest records that I can find, is simply by will. Self
will is the route to the light. A thought free consciousness. A plane of
pure being. And, they called this plain of pure being "the Plane of Sharon".
It was, actually, this very concept of being, being through the "Star Fire",
being "I am that I am", that became the problem for Jehovah, when the edit
against blood was issued.
But, in actual fact,
what you are doing, through the kind of training you are going through, the
type of processes that you put your own minds through, you are actually in
your own way creating higher productions of these hormones. Pineal
secretions, which are enabling you to move into the higher realms than would
be normal, in terms of cultural thinking. Behold, said Jehovah,
the man is
one of us. This is an interesting quote, and I think weíll have a little
break after this, just to get ourselves comfortable. But, this quotation
comes from 2200 BC, and itís not too far adrift from the sorts of things
weíre talking about here, today.
This is at the roots of the knowledge, itís said, this is the route to the personal God. Because, the personal God is within, and the Self is God, the absolute consciousness, "I am that I am".