October 23, 1999

Q: Hello.
A: Hello.

Q: And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Eggoram.

Q: And where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea.

Q: I want to you have lost a fan because he was not happy with what he considered to be “internal inconsistencies” in that you were NOT favorably disposed toward hallucinations produced by substances such as Mescaline and Ayahuasca, but yet you recommend Melatonin because it is a hallucinogen. Then, you said that spiritual powers could not be obtained through chemicals or plant type means, but then said that Melatonin exercises psychic abilities. Could you comment on this?
A: Several comments: First of all, “fan” is short for “fanatic.” Secondly, melatonin does not force an alteration in physiological brain chemicals, as do mescaline, peyote, LSD, etc. Accessing the higher levels of psychical awareness through such processes is harmful to the balance levels of the prime chakra. This is because it alters the natural rhythms of psychic development by causing reliance on the part of the subject, thus subjugating the learning process. It is a form of self-imposed abridging of free will. Melatonin simply allows the system to clear obstructions in the brain chemistry naturally, thereby allowing the subject to continue to learn at a natural pace. And, it is by no means unimportant that melatonin is a natural body hormone. The other substances mentioned are, at least in part, synthetic, with the exception of peyote. But even that is not a natural ingredient of the human physiological being. And besides, we have already discussed the importance, or lack thereof, of those who pass judgment upon this exercise, or communication.

Q: Okay. Going in another direction, we have just recently learned that there is a fellow named Randell Mills who claims to have discovered or written the Grand Unified Field Theory. Is this in fact, true?
A: If he has, where is the evidence?

Q: We ordered the book! A hundred bucks, too! It’s on its way as we speak!
A: Theories must be successfully tested to be valid according to your scientific convention. Otherwise, they are merely hypotheses, and anyone can do that, for 100 dollars a pop, we might add.

Q: Well, he does seem to have a lot of support...
A: support is not confirmation. A completed, valid Unified Field Theory does indeed exist among 3rd density STS, but it is held in the strictest secrecy!

Q: Along that line, Ark is getting really sick of programming. He has put in his CV in dozen or so places, but there are a lot of places he can’t work because he isn’t a citizen yet.
A: Citizenship can be expedited, explore at once.

Q: Is there something else we can explore at once regarding employment so he doesn’t have to do this programming. Working as a physicist would be nice.
A: Yes, but it may also be limiting, though in a different way.

Q: Do you have any suggestions?
A: There are many such opportunities in the area.

Q: Well, give us a couple of words to focus our search?
A: Interstate 4.

Q: Don’t hang up on us here now! This is serious!
A: Where have you looked?

Q: In all the obvious places, of course. Lockheed, NASA, universities, etc.
(A) Okay, I was advised to contact this Phipps, and we had an exchange, but he was not able to explain one thing that I was asking. Finally he gave up and said that it would be the end of our communication because he wanted to have his “private life,” and he apologized for his errors! The question is, of course, whether there is anything of value, and how to find it, in this work of Phipps. This contact with Phipps was unsatisfactory. He couldn’t answer questions, wouldn’t answer questions; there are several possibilities here: one is that what he was writing was crap.
A: When one confronts one of a “showman’s” nature, it usually ends in frustration. Sometimes, someone near them is able to offer more concrete answers.

Q: (A) Yet, I was advised to contact this guy by you!
A: Yes, because sometimes the trail leads to paydirt, even if not immediately. Remember, this is a puzzle, not a roadmap.

Q: Well, maybe something WILL result from this contact and conversation. Maybe the comments you have made will be read by someone else. You just never know.
(A) Yes, it’s a puzzle. But, this Phipps presents Maxwell Equations with extra terms, which probably is wrong, but there may be something to this. It may show the way. My hypothesis is that what he has said about Maxwell Equations is wrong, but it shows a way toward something that can work. Is this correct?

A: Yes.

Q: We learned that Leedskalnin supposedly wrote a book back in 1949. (F) He did? I bet he didn’t reveal his secrets!
(L) No, but it is interesting anyway. We ordered it. We read parts of it from the internet, and it is written in rather archaic language, or he had some problems explaining things in English, but it is about basic principles he was investigating. We want to play with some of his experiments at some point.
(F) Is there anything about spinning?
(L) No, but I figured out what the airplane seat was for by reading some of his experiments.
(A) Is there any experiment in this book that would show us the way toward UFT, or better, a way out of standard physics? Or, are his experiments just standard things, but since he did not know the laws of physics, he may have misinterpreted his results? He was amazed by the behavior of magnets, but the experiments were standard? Well, we will have to see. I wrote to this anti-gravity group and asked them if there was one, just one, repeatable experiment that I can do myself, which cannot be explained by standard theories. Is there one?
A: Is there such an experiment, yes. But one needs the necessary equipment, and that is difficult to come by. One needs the means to supply the adequate power for an artificially created EM field.

Q: (A) But that would mean that what is in this book by Leedskalnin is just normal experiments because, for the most part, they just use car batteries.

A: More power than that is needed, because the grid is too weak for substantive results.

Q: (A) But, when he was building this Coral Castle, apparently he was using such effects! What power was he using?
A: Sound waves.

Q: (A) How was he producing these sound waves?
A: Through correlation of rocks and power source, obtained “illegally.” Instrument was similar to a tuning fork, but energized to a level that was lethal if one were to come in contact with it, or its ground.

Q: (A) Have we been discouraged from experimenting here?
A: No.

Q: (L) Did he use this tuning fork while sitting in his suspended swing?
A: Yes, because to do otherwise would have been fatal!.

Q: (L) Where did he illegally obtain this power source?
A: Tapped into high energy power lines.

Q: (L) So, he was an energy pirate! But, that certainly makes it less mysterious!

(A) Can we obtain the necessary equipment? I know what we need.

A: Be careful.

Q: (L) No kidding! I don’t want to vaporize!
(A) We will experiment on Percy.
(L) No! Not the poor doggie!
(A) I have one more question. I want to ask about time. We have been told several times that time is subjective, time does not exist. On the other hand, we are told again and again about electromagnetic phenomena. Now, the problem is, electromagnetism is governed by Maxwell Equations, and you have to write Maxwell Equations with time as one of the variables because it is all about how EM fields propagate in time. I am totally confused. I don’t know how to do EM theory without time. I haven’t the slightest idea. And, this silly Phipps, wanted to replace time, and he advocates something that he calls “proper time.” Proper time is something that is an individual time rather than a universal time that is inclusive of everyone; so there is this proper time that is individual; every particle has its own time. I want to know how to do physics without time. At least how to start. Or electromagnetism without time. Maxwell equations are about time. Einstein’s relativity is about space AND time. How to do physics without time?
A: So many questions, on at a “time,” please.

Q: (A) Can equations of electromagnetism be written without using time as we use it?
A: Yes.

Q: Should we discard this time that is in the present equation altogether, or replace it by something else?
A: Reinterpret. It is subjective, therefore fluid, or variable. In other words, open to many interpretations.

Q: (A) I want to ask about the theory that I developed with Blanchard that was recently criticized by a third referee of a journal. The paper was rejected. Essentially, the referee was, in a sense, partly right. I am not completely convinced that what we have done is going in the right direction. I spent on this ten years going in a certain direction, but then the development has stopped. The problem is that I don’t understand Quantum Theory. Trying to understand Quantum Theory, we developed this theory in which part of the world is classical and part of the world is quantum. But, of course, we don’t know which part of the world is classical. Stapp was thinking that it was mind, consciousness; Penrose thinks it is gravity. The question is: is this theory that we were developing with Blanchard, for ten years or even more, is it a step forward, or is it just crap like this Phipps produced? Can it be made a step forward by completing it?
A: Yes.

Q: Okay, if it can be a step forward, the main question that we don’t know the answer to is: what is classical? Gravity or consciousness or something else? What? Or, perhaps everything is classical...
A: Classical negates consciousness, regarding the mind as merely a function of chemical functions and electrical impulses occurring within a vacuum, rather than being interfaced with the rest of creation at all levels of density and all dimensions, which is of course, the case. Gravity is the “glue which binds all aspects of reality, physical and ethereal. Nothing would exist without consciousness to perceive it. Classical physics assumes, among other things, that consciousness and “the brain” are one and the same, or that one exclusively facilitates the other. In actuality, the brain is merely that conduit which facilitates conscious expression in the physical state of human 3rd density states and similar manifestations.

Q: (L) I would like to ask a sort of general question: since we have this website and a fairly good amount of visitation, but it has become sort of a forum, so to speak. Most of the basic concepts are on the website. I am little by little getting other things up; most of it is already in the transcripts; but once in awhile there is expansion needed, such as the subject of hallucinogens this evening; but, for the most part, the pretty basic things are there and are being discussed. My question is: is there a particularly fruitful direction that these sessions ought to take from this point on?
A: Just let them flow, as always.

Q: (L) I seem to be lacking a particular element in my diet, but I am not sure what it is. Can you tell what it is and the best source to get it?
A: What is the problem that makes you believe there is a lacking?

Q: (L) I have this irregular system and I believe I have a hormone problem.
A: What sort?

Q: (L) Just what I said. Irregular. That’s as specific as I want to get!
A: Calcium, potassium is a little off balance. And you are prone to experimentation based on impatience.

Q: I want to ask a secret question.
A: No. Share with forum.

Q: I can’t! It’s a personal question!
A: You have the ability to receive answers to such inquiries in an equally “personal communication.”

Q: (A) About the programming, I can do it as long as I am well paid. But, in a university, you have access to journals and books and so forth. But, maybe I don’t need it.
(L) Is the job situation stable?
A: It is stable, if tedious.

Q: It’s certainly that. Good night.
A: Good night.

End of Session

Back to Contents

November 13, 1999

We have a lot of questions to get through tonight, and I have sort of organized them so that the ones that will go quickly are in the top of the pile; but we know how THAT goes! Could be a BIG mistake! We could be here all night on just one of them! Okay....

Q: Hello.
A: Hello.

Q: And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Fogorrh.

Q: And where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea.

Q: The first question we have here is from a correspondent who asks: “Have the Cassiopaeans ever mentioned the significance of numbers?” She was particularly interested in the number 666, and I answered that there was already some discussion of this on the website. I also mentioned that there is some good material on the subject that I have not posted yet because I have not gotten to that yet. But, she did ask a couple of questions that we had not covered before, so I wanted to get them in here. She asks about this “magic square of the sun.” Does this have any deep symbolic meaning?
A: Mathematics is organized such that one can construct what one wishes.

Q: Are you saying that Professor Eco was correct when he wrote: “With numbers you can do anything you like... I believe the universe is a great symphony of numerical correspondences...” and that the works of man “reproduce in their structures, unconsciously, the harmonies of the cosmos. ...If there is a secret, it is much more profound...” and that those who write about such things remain simply on the surface, “discovering with their incredibly tortuous methods a straightforward truth. ...The true initiate knows that these are metaphors, masks, conventional lies or, at most, pathetic surrogates, for an ancestral forgotten force.”
A: Yes.

Q: Okay. Then it’s a good thing that it’s Greek to both of us! Next, she heard something along this line and asked: “Do crop circles use geometry and gematria to send us messages?
A: Messages? Yes. Geometry and “geometria? If one so desires.

Q: Okay. I think we can use our brains to figure out the rest of it. Next question; a reader writes: “In Scientology, man is viewed as a composite entity comprised of one being, supposed hopefully to be “in charge,” and an enormous number of separate entities in various states of consciousness/unconsciousness, not completely dissimilar to the description given in Ouspensky’s “In Search of the Miraculous.” One of the critical differences between what the Cassiopaeans are saying and what is given as fact in Scientology is that, in Scientology, one is taught that one is not ultimately One, that an individual remains an individual to the upper reaches of evolution, and evolves as a “god.”
A: The Grand Pulsation makes individuality a temporary state of being.

Q: By saying that the Grand Pulsation is only a temporary state of individuation, this means that all are One and return to the state of Oneness.
A: Yes. If so, it is always true. All are ultimately “god.”

Q: But they don’t evolve as a god by remaining individual in the upper reaches of evolution?
A: What would be the purpose?

Q: I guess they are hung up on remaining individuals and becoming as “gods” for power and control issues... sort of ultimate STS.
A: Maybe that would work if time and linear reality were correct, but...

Q: Next question, and I think this one will be quick: can you make any comments on the likelihood of this Y2K situation getting out of hand and bringing on the “New World Order” or causing the institution of Martial Law, or causing people to need to store food, guns, ammunition and take all their money out of the bank? There is an AWFUL lot of hysteria out there about this...
A: Ask them what happened on November 7th.

Q: Oh, you mean the big Hoagland prediction that something was going to strike the earth... supposedly revealed to him by a “confidential informant” who somehow proved his “reliability,” by having “inside information” and so forth. In other words, another spate of disinformation?
A: Yup!

Q: Okay. Another reader asks what really happened to Flight 990?
A: Pilots lost control when wind burst tipped plane. Autopilot was disengaged after beginning of dive. Centrifugal force prevented soon enough correction in attitude to prevent structural damage to wings and struts. When plane was re-ascending, stresses sheared off right wing. No radio contact was made due to the desperation of the situation requiring all attention of the flight crew.

Q: Did you mean “altitude?”
A: We meant “attitude.”

Q: So there was really nothing mysterious about the crash of Flight 990.
A: Mysteries are subjective.


Q: Were there any mysterious personages aboard this plane, such as persons involved in the “HOR project” in Egypt?
A: Probably not. But even if so, do some of your correspondents think everything is a conspiracy!?!

Q: Yes. Some of them do! Next question; a correspondent writes: I am wondering if you could ask the Cassiopaeans about the ORIGIN of the TAROT CARDS. Do they represent the esoteric knowledge that the god Thoth - an Atlantean High Priest - wanted saved at the time of the sinking of Atlantis?
A: No.

Q: What do Tarot cards represent?
A: A method for sensitives to tune in with. Or for less psychically endowed persons to “play” with.

Q: Were they carved by the god Thoth on transparent crystal tablets according to principles of sacred geometry?
A: If so, why did Thoth not get a “copyright?”

Q: So, they were not carved on transparent crystal tablets?
A: No.

Q: Did the Atlantean high priests bring them to Egypt?
A: No.

Q: Did they come from the Druids?
A: No.

Q: Who invented them?
A: Greek origin, refined in Roman times in France.

Q: Well, I guess that takes care of that! Now, there is a rather desperate couple of letters from a correspondent who writes: “about 5 years ago , I had a reading from a very good trance channel. The female voice that came in said I was from Andromeda and she was my Tracker. She explained my lineage and evolvement there. She also said I had been to many ascending planets. I assumed that what I did was assist in that process.; she did not say that. I have now enrolled in that spiritual school of ascension. They say that I am an information broker. That means that I have unconscious agreements to provide ascension information to Andromeda. That does not sound bad, it sounds like service. It’s not. It keeps me from ascending. It also creates karma for me , because I have been instrumental in taking other people’s information without them knowing it. I need information on this phenomenon. I hope you will help me. No one knows how to break the contract effectively. The school says that the Andromedans have engineered thier ascension. is this true? I wish to cancel my contract and get my information back, how can I do that? Information brokering is causing those involved to not ascend , even when they do not consciously know it. Can the Andromedans not read the information without depleteing our ascension gridwork? We ask that something be changed so that we ar e not depleted. We ask the Cassiopaeans to assist. This is a call to assist in returni ng information and canceling contracts. that affect our information. All help will be appreciated. I do not have a clue about which Andromedans are involved. “ This lady wrote in an earlier letter that this “School of Ascension” was run by folks who call themselves “Lord and Lady Agape and Lord and Lady Athena.” Aside from the fact that this sounds an awful lot like that Circe nonsense, I thought you might address this directly, aside from the fact that the only contract I can see that needs to be cancelled is the one to pay any money to attend this “school.”
A: Dabbling in such nonsense is not necessary for one to ascend. Two more comments: in this case, a “good trance channel” is defined as one which tells the client that which the client wishes to hear. Comment two: What?! No “godsparks?”

[This is a humorous reference to another “psychic” of which we are aware, who was assigning “godspark levels” to her clients in a completely nonsensical cosmology designed to separate the client from their money and make them feel important]

Q: Here is a guy who asks: “do you know about the ‘Revelation of the Method?’”
A: What method?

Q: Good question.
(A) I would like to know how we should respond to the Fundamentalists who write and threaten us?
A: Best approach is to not respond.

Q: Next question, or series of questions; this correspondent wrote on our Discussion Page: “If the Cassiopeans are correct in that Humans came from the 7th density via Lucifer/the fall, why did they choose this? If we came from 7th density we would be aware of the knowledge of the Cassiopeans and more, and as time has no meaning above the 3rd density, then we would have known what would happen to us, including the takeover by the STS group. This can be explained by the Grand Cycle, as we would have known that we would need to do this, but then where is free will? It would seem as though we are caught in an endless loop, which is ultimately futile. On the other hand, if there is free will then, as time does not exist, we should not even be here as all would have happened in an instant as everything progressed to 7th density in a single moment of thought! Since this does not appear to have happened, then everything must in fact be changing continuously. 7th density is union with the One, as stated by the Cassiopaeans. This would equate to the ultimate expression of our existence, as we were, are and will be there. Why leave? As this requires an orientation to STO, then our decision to leave could only be a benefit to all, as opposed to being “cast out” for the desire for physicality. To me, this can express an attempt to go beyond 7th density! Why leave unless there was an something more to be learned in this existence! But what could that possibly be! The Cassiopeans, who claim to be what we were/are/will be, perhaps could shed some light on this subject. Another possibility is that we are attempting to change the Lizzies by letting them change us! As much as they have given us their brain, they are taking samples of us to incorporate into the Greys and possibly themselves. Hard to get more Machiavellian than that! Last thought. If we at 7th density did make a mistake by coming down to 3rd density, then couldn’t the Cassiopeans, at 6th, be just as prone to error? The reason I have gone into these lines of thought are that I want to understand a bit of the BIG picture. Understanding motives goes a long way to understanding our world/reality. I would like to try to understand our motives for being here, as has been pointed out, knowledge is all and we are ultimately in charge of our own destinies regardless of whatever influences there are. I admit I would like to ascribe some higher motives to our presence here out of ego, but wouldn’t it make more sense as well?” I suppose you want me to break this down into questions?
A: Yes we do.

Q: Okay. If humans came from 7th density via the “Fall,” why did they choose
this?
A: Not choice in a sense as understood by 3rd density STS.

Q: If we came from 7th density we would be aware of the knowledge of the Cassiopeans and more, and as time has no meaning above the 3rd density, then we would have known what would happen to us, including the takeover by the STS group.
A: Who said that humans descended from 7th density?

Q: Well, you said that human beings are a “fragmented soul unit” that, before they came into the bodies here on earth were “In Union with the One.” And, Union with the One is 7th density as you have so often said.
A: We have also said the the end is the beginning and vice versa.

Q: It would seem as though we are caught in an endless loop, which is ultimately futile.
A: It would seem that way if one is transposing 3rd density linear thought from a physicalized standpoint upon that which is infinitely more complex.

Q: On the other hand, if there is free will then, as time does not exist, we should not even be here as all would have happened in an instant as everything progressed to 7th density in a single moment of thought!
A: See previous answer.

Q: The reason I have gone into these lines of thought are that I want to understand a bit of the BIG picture. Understanding motives goes a long way to understanding our world/reality. I would like to try to understand our motives for being here. So, he wants the big picture: why are we here? Why does ANYTHING exist?
A: This cannot be understood from your perspective. But no need. Patience, please. Lessons are learned sequentially. And, of course we can make errors. After all, we are still learning too, Ken!

Q: Now, here is this: You probably know I have been in correspondence with your husband regarding a way to apply his theories about the possibility of time travel. He has withdrawn any support on the grounds that there may be one chance in 10,000 that to do so would violate free will. I can’t speak for Karen and she can no longer speak to me. I only know what she said while she was here. The last three months were very bad, and if she refused to stay here on the day she died, I would understand. But it is farther in the past which I want to change. I want to give her 5 to 10 years with one of my kidneys instead of less than two years dying on a machine. I cannot speak to her anymore, but perhaps you can. . Her name in this life was Karen Claudia Scarborough. Ask her if she could undo the transfusion and receive Gary’s kidney, would she want to try again?
If you can reach her, please give her this message:
The Cassiopaeans said that time is selective and variable. I do not want to win a lottery or cure cancer or become rich and famous. Someone I love had a dream about creating a life where she could run a small art shop and be happy and successful. It was a small dream but she didn’t think she could ever realize because she had a psychiatric problem she didn’t understand. The problem was never completely resolved, but enough so that she could try to make her dream come true. The last two years of her life were the only ones that she said were happy. Nothing in my life gave me as much happiness as helping her build her dream. I don’t want all that much, just a little more time for love. Please ask the Cassiopaens if developing a technology to allow humans to experience time as selective and variable is violating anyone’s free will. The channeling you received say it is a natural function that is blocked by our illusions. I don’t see how free will relates to that.
Please ask Karen what she wants.
A: Now, as for this person: does he not understand? It is the soul that matters, not the body!!!

Q: Yes, but he has lost his perspective in his grief. He wants to deliver this message to Karen: “Karen, I know now that I should not have been so focused on storage and generators at our place in the country. It was my form of denial. I could create a place where we could survive even if the world crumbled around us for as long as we had fluid for your machine. What I couldn’t face was that the machine was no longer working. Every week, your blood sugar swings got wider and you lost a little more function. Instead of creating our retreat because it was something I could do, I should have spent every moment with you. I should have been doing what I can do no longer, holding you in my arms and telling you how much I love you. I have all the time I need now to prepare for the future but all my hopes and dreams for that future died with you. I’m so sorry, sweetheart. Please forgive me.”
A: Karen is at 5th density. Her soul energy understands what is germane. If forgiveness is warranted, it is given. This person is obviously comfortable with STS reality.

Q: Is developing a technology to allow humans to experience time as selective and variable violating anyone’s free will?
A: Depends on how it is utilized.

Q: Would it be violating Karen’s free will to go back and try to prevent her death?
A: It would also be impossible.

Q: Why would it be impossible? Technologically impossible? Or, was it that she had chosen to die no matter what for karmic reasons that we aren’t aware of?
A: More complex than that, but closer to the latter.

Q: Well, I would like to tell this person just one thing that would help him to feel some peace and to understand a little better... but, he is so deep in his grief, I don’t think he CAN understand anything but that...
A: You got it!

Q: Any other comment?
A: No.

Q: He wants me to ask Karen what she wants.
A: This is not 5th density “love connection.”

Q: Okay, now this next correspondent writes: “I decided to listen to one of the C’s suggestions about Melatonin. What the heck, after all I might meet Santa! Curiously, It was rather hard to find it in our stores. It turns out that only a herbal/natural version of it is allowed for sale but I don’t think that it’s any different. Well, I must say it is all that I ever thought it would be. I have gone through the stages described in your transcripts and now am at a rather odd stage where everything seems like a TV broadcast Last night I had a very unusual dream about an asteroid impacting Earth. I must say, I do not necessarily subscribe to this theory. I have been reading A LOT about this so it could be my subconscious mind playing tricks on me. The impact took place in the vicinity of the north pole with the approach path from the south. But there was this curious red line extending up and over the pole after it had taken place. I don’t know what it meant. Before, I also dreamt about there only being one more pope, the Japanese being involved with the Grays and I had some dreams with religious connotations. But what really blew me away was a dream couple of nights ago. I dream that I was lifting up from my bed, through the chimney (which I do not have) into a space ship! I could actually see myself lifting off the bed. Then I was on some sort of a raised surface with a short BEING with long arms and A HUMAN DOCTOR beside me. The little fellow seemed rather upset and tried to calm me down even though I was at peace, waving his arms to stop doing something. Then the doctor tried to do something to my lower back but I woke up. Now get this - I woke up turned around - with my feet on my pillows, on my back which I rarely do. When I got up, I actually noticed that the sheets weren’t messed up at all - when I toss in my sleep, the sheets are always kicked off half of the bed. I don’t know what happened, I know it sounds suspicious but I am very skeptical. In my case it is probably more of a wishful thinking than anything else. Regardless of what had taken place, this particular hormone resulted in a lot of research material.” I want to ask about this dream that our friend had under the influence of melatonin. There has been something of a controversy about it recently as one group claims that melatonin is stimulated in the brain by aliens in order to cause the paralysis that overcomes the victim and thereby enables them to go about their nefarious abducting activity. Is that, in fact, the case? Is melatonin part of the paralysis factor of alien abduction?
A: No.

Q: What chemicals are stimulated in the body to cause this paralysis?
A: That is not the method used.

Q: What IS the method used?
A: Electronic wave diversion.

Q: They are diverting the electronic waves of our brain or our physiology?
A: Closer.

Q: Okay, what about our friend’s dream; was this a memory, a dream or an abduction?
A: Etheric body abduction.

Q: What was the purpose of abducting his etheric body?
A: Study.

Q: Who abducted his etheric body?
A: Orion STS. Melatonin only serves to make one more aware of processes in this context.

Q: So, lots of people are being abducted, physically, etherically, or in other ways, and simply are not aware of it at all?
A: More often etherically.

Q: Most abductions are etheric, but people are not aware. The melatonin is what enables them to be aware of what is happening by removing the blocks the aliens put in place?
A: Precisely.

Q: And, by becoming aware, do they have some chance of stopping the abduction process by their awareness?
A: Or more importantly, limiting the damage. Knowledge protects.

Q: Well, that’s bizarre. Now, our friend also writes: “I’d like to mention one more thought that I had the other day. Actually, it occurred to me while watching a trailer for “Cliffhanger”. In that trailer Stallone was jumping out of the frozen pool of water with heaps of ice flying up in the air. At that point, I thought about the different states of energy. Ice is frozen water. From what I remember of my physics classes, freezing is like taking kinetic energy out of vibrating particles. The absolute zero is when the particles stop vibrating at all. Now, vapor goes the other way round - the extra kinetic energy is added and the particles escape their gravitational bounds turning into steam. Well, what if the ascension is like adding some extra energy. The the gravitational or other boundaries become meaningless since each individual vibrates on a higher level. What if you keep increasing the energy levels and the vibration is so rapid that you cannot be located - you are basically EVERYWHERE at any given point in “time” - the differences between the individual particles disappear and you become ONE/UNIFIED. Now, WHAT IF THAT ENERGY IS KNOWLEDGE?? The more knowledge you add, the more energetic your soul becomes.” Is this going in the right direction? Is knowledge energy or is energy knowledge? When you add knowledge, do you have more energy?
A: Energy is a component of knowledge, yes.

Q: Okay, now I was reading in this book that told that many secrets were hidden in the mystery of the Egyptian cat worship. I looked it up and found that this first sacred cat, the goddess Bastet, appeared sitting under a “Persea Tree.” What is this Persea Tree?
A: The tree refers to the afterlife, as envisioned by the Egyptians. Felines were thought to be psychic, thus the connection to the afterlife, which was revered in the Nile Basin.

Q: Who were the Levites?
A: Sect of monklike pacifists. Connected to Moses.

Q: Well, that doesn’t make a lot of sense. They sure did a lot of warmongering and they were behind all the rules and regulations that the Jews followed and that was behind the orders to massacre entire races of. That doesn’t seem to make sense at all!
A: Oh yes it does. Pacifists can be managers, not slaves.

Q: What about this magazine in India that wants to put the Cassiopaeans on the cover? Should we get out our sheets and paint dots on our foreheads?
A: Not likely. No sheets, no dots!

Q: Now, as you know, Richard Hoagland and others had this big thing going about something that was going to impact the planet. It didn’t. Nevertheless, these folks and their ilk now have a new circus going on, including rumors about the HOR in Egypt and so on. Are there any upcoming situations that we should be aware of? Is there anything in particular that we need to pay attention to? There is so much going on with these earthquakes and so on... it’s pretty busy out there!
A: Just watch and learn. We do not like the notion of joining the prognosticator soup! And on that note, good night.

End of Session

Back to Contents

December 4, 1999

Q: Hello.
A: Hello.

Q: And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Laopinnah.

Q: And where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea.

Q: We have a number of issues to deal with this evening; the first one is the subject of Flight 990. There have been a number of scenarios suggested by the media and other sources on the internet. One of them says that the autopilot was disengaged BEFORE the plane began to dive. Is this the case?
A: No. Plane was disturbed from flight path by windburst, therefore, autopilot was disengaged in order to better combat problem.

Q: There has been a big controversy going on. One of the contributors to this controversy was Ed Dames who, on the Art Bell show, claimed that his organization “remote viewed” the situation and that there had been a fight in the cockpit. This claim was made, I believe, before the flight data recorders were retrieved. So, this was a scenario that the media picked up. Then, after one of the recorders was found, for a short while, this idea was popular, because it seemed to explain the crazy behavior of the aircraft. But then the voice recorder was found, and there was no real evidence to support the “fight” scenario, but there was a sort of prayerful exclamation heard, being made by the co-pilot who was, apparently alone in the cockpit when the activity began. Then, the pilot returned and there were sounds of desperate activity and so forth, so the next scenario proposed was that the co-pilot had decided to commit suicide in a big way. As a result of this Ed Dames episode on Art Bell, followed by the NTSB and FBI trying to fit the clues to Dames’ scenario, there is now the suggestion making the rounds of the internet rumor mongers that Ed Dames is in the employ of the “powers that be,” and that he deliberately planted this story so that they could then come along and validate it to give him more credibility so that he would be in place to plant more and greater rumors and stories of the disinformation variety. Is that the case? Did Ed Dames and his group accurately remote view the cockpit of Flight 990?
A: No. Ed was hoping for a “hit.”

Q: So, Ed Dames is NOT in the employ of the “Powers that be?”
A: No.

Q: Was the co-pilot suicidal?
A: No.

Q: So, what he said was the equivalent of “Oh my God!” or something?
A: Close.

Q: Now, I have another correspondent who was on a beach about a hundred miles west of the crash site. This individual was with a companion and they both saw an orange glow in the direction of the crash at approximately the time of the event. This orange glow was, in her opinion, anomalous, and quickly disappeared. Was what was seen by my correspondent an effect of this plane crash?
A: Possibly linked, but not likely.

Q: Well, the question now comes about the nature of the “wind burst.” You previously said about this that “mysteries are subjective.” Did you mean to imply that we could have or should have followed up with questions about the wind burst itself?
A: No, these things happen. Sometimes a fault in autopilot analog computer causes system to fail to adjust properly, thus causing an attitude aberration in wingtips. Planes can dive suddenly and inexplicably. Refer to April 1979, Flint Michigan, TWA flight nonstop from New York to Minneapolis. Quick pilot reaction saved that one, but it was close, very close! Included same “g-force” anomalies, i.e. passengers floating out of their seats, etc. Suggest you look this up on internet. Aircraft manufacturers jealously protect their “turf.” 1999 incident involved Boeing 767, 1979 incident was a 727. At root is the fact that Boeing is feeling Airbus Industry Inc. nipping at its heels. It is all that 3rd density STS love of money stuff, you know!

Q: (A) Well, about this wind burst, was there some dimensional phenomenon or trans-density window as we have suggested on our site?
(L) Was it an ordinary wind burst? I think I have heard that it is impossible to have a wind burst at that altitude.
A: Not “ordinary,” but not trans-density, or dimensional. It was a Jetstream “eddy.”

Q: So, there were no rays, beams, microwaves, trans-density or dimensional
windows, weird, anomalous, conspiratorial event going on here?
A: No, no, no, no, no!

Q: It was just a terrible tragedy. The pilots fought as hard as they could to save the plane, but were unable to do so, and the bottom line is a lot of people died?
A: Yes, but as is common in all-out emergencies, the human factor was not “perfect.” Pilots were working at cross purposes, but not intentionally! Look up the data on the 1979 case and point this out to the conspiracy thirsty correspondents!

Q: Next item on the agenda: the loss of the new Mars probe. As of the latest I heard, it had still not “called home.” Is the Mars probe lost?
A: Not lost, just partly dysfunctional.

Q: Why is it dysfunctional? Or partly dysfunctional?
A: Rocky surface, misalignment of antennae, slight damage to communications package. may still be retrievable if technicians can locate proper backup software inlet.

Q: So, that is the advice to try to save the mission?
A: Yes.

Q: Anything else?
A: No.

Q: So, there is no conspiracy there, either?
A: It is just as dangerous and just as useless to “see” conspiracy in everything s it is to “see” conspiracy in nothing. We tire of conspiracy “buffs.” They are nutty, and serve as perfect false sponsors to those who really DO seek to conduct widespread mental/psychic manipulations and control.

Q: Okay, that leads into the next question about the excessive contrail activity.
(F) I read the articles about the contrails. There did not seem to be any way of verifying anything that was said. Essentially, you were left with the claims of this or that person, few of whom were trained observers, or who were taking all the factors into consideration.
(L) Well, we noticed them a lot in the spring of 1998 when we had all the floods and fires later. They are THERE!
(F) Yes, but the claims are that contrails were appearing in clear skies, at which point the sky became overcast as a result of these contrails, when the two may not have been related at all. Then, people were noticing cob webs or “angel hair” type stuff falling on the ground. (L) I agree that a lot of it is unverifiable and I haven’t seen any hard proof myself, either; but they ARE there! LOTS of these jets flying about. An exceedingly LOT of flying!
And, not only that, other things have been reported and photographed; strange
streaks and lines in the sky, dark and light both - as though some sort of
cosmic structure is bleeding through!
(F) Yes, but you have to wonder about
these people. I mean, the stuff about the radar anomalies was clearly an example of ignorance of both radar and weather. Oh, yes, big spheres appear on the radar, but those have been appearing forever! They are nothing but cumulo-nimbus blow-ups - what is called a meso-cyclone, and is very common. The only reason they are getting excited about it is because there is all this communication, all these satellite and radar link-ups, and now the average person gets to see what weathermen have been seeing all along! More coverage and communication just makes it seem like it is something new. People need knowledge about this! Sure, there is stuff going on out there, but people seem to be seeing boogy men behind absolutely everything that happens! And this is because they have no knowledge about these things. Why are these people going off the deep end about these half-baked ideas without bothering to get expert opinions, or even a number of opinions? Why do they promulgate all this nonsense to everybody else as though THEY are experts, with nothing to balance the observations in the way of competent analysis? Meso-cyclones, eruptions of cumulo-nimbus super cells are, by their very nature, perfectly circular because of the cyclonic up-draft!
(L) But, the fact still remains, in my opinion, that there are a LOT, LOT, LOT of planes flying above us in the past few years! Whether they are dumping anything on our heads, or what, there are an extreme number of planes flying in these upper level criss-cross patterns. Now, whether they are just playing war-games, or they are spy planes, they are doing SOMETHING! What is the reason for all of this upper level flying that results in these criss-crossed contrails that everybody is seeing?
A: A lot of it is “training maneuver”oriented.

Q: Why are they training so many pilots? What are they preparing for?
A: Military budgets must be justified, you know. Review “Military-Industrial Complex 101.”

Q: So, this is just training flight, justification of budget, and nothing more than that?
A: Well, we would not say “not anything more to it than that,” but, when you say “M-IC,” you have said a lot!

Q: Are you implying that there is a build-up of the Military-Industrial Complex for a reason?
A: To preserve status quo during “peacetime.” This peace business is not very profitable, you know.

Q: Does that suggest that they are building up to set off a war so they can make more money?
A: Maybe if indeed, and if the populous can be hoodwinked. But, fortunately, the public is less hoodwinkable. Maybe the real enemy is “out there, “ rather than “over there.” Was it not always?

Q: Does any of this increased aircraft activity have anything to do with the increased awareness and activities of aliens in and around our planet?
A: As always. But, this awareness is factionalized and compartmentalized.

Q: This brings us to the question from one of our readers: is there anything to this so-called “Gulf War Syndrome?”
A: Of course.

Q: What is the real cause of the “Gulf War Syndrome?”
A: Medications used supposedly to counteract effects of serin; nerve agent.

Q: So, a medication was given to these people to counteract a possible threat to live, and the medication itself was a threat to life?
A: Yes.

Q: Now, on a similar subject: what I hear from various correspondents on the net, there are a lot of folks who have “emerging” Montauk memories. These folks are “waking up” and it is now “kitschy” to be a “Montauk Survivor.” It’s like a sub-culture... can it be possible that this many people...
A: No.

Q: Well, what is it that these people are remembering? As I understand it, they are very sincere and are convinced that they have these “Montauk experiment” memories.
A: Some do, but most, no.

Q: Well, the ones who don’t, are they lying deliberately, or are they being deceived with screen memories from abductions; have they received some sort of programming to make them believe this; or are they just being caught up in a sort of hysteria that is “catching” and gets them attention?
A: The latter is closest.

Q: Is there any way a person can discover who, among them, is telling the truth? Is there any clue to validate what any of them are saying?
A: Is it not obvious? Check thoroughly into their background using recollections of independent third parties. If the supposed “Montaukee” was known to have never have lived anywhere near Montauk, then it would seem unlikely they were ever there.

Q: Now, according to some information posted on the Millennium Group site, there are some photographs that seem to indicate that there IS something anomalous in orbit around the Sun... maybe a new “planet, “ or something. Is there a new object in our solar system in a close orbit around the sun?
A: Maybe.

Q: There is conjecture that this object appeared around the time of the passage of the Hale Bopp comet. Is that the case?
A: No.

Q: Is this object that is possibly in orbit around the sun, is it a natural or artificial construction?
A: Latter.
Q Who constructed it?
A: Orion STS.

Q: What is it?
A: HQ.

Q: The Orion Headquarters?
A: For your star system.

Q: Okay, you said “maybe” to this being a “new object.” When did it arrive, or when was it placed there?
A: You measure “time” linearly.

Q: Can we give it a “linear” definition, or does it come and go through some sort of portal in terms of time, in a cyclical way, or a variable and selective way?
A: Yes, but it arrived at that coordinate 26730 years ago, sort of.

Q: What is its orbit, or distance from the Sun?
A: 31,230,000 miles.

Q: How large is this object?
A: 1005.6 kilometers diameter.

Q: What is the general configuration or shape of it?
(A) A sphere, a ball, a disc, a cylinder?
A: Partial sphere, hexagonal.

Q: (A) Is it in a circular orbit or an elliptical orbit?
A: Circular. Rotation is altered by guidance system, gravitationally powered.

Q: What is its angle to the plane of the ecliptic?
A: 21 degrees.

Q: Okay, you said that it is “headquarters,” so that answers what it does. And, it did not arrive with Hale Bopp. Just off to the side, was there REALLY a Hale Bopp companion - this rumor just won’t die!?
A: No.

Q: Now, what do these Orions DO in this object? I mean, isn’t it a little warm so close to the sun? I know. That’s a stupid question. Space is cold.
A: Yes, and study magnetism for answers.

Q: Do Orions LIVE in this object?
A: Close.

Q: Do they use it as a transfer portal?
A: Yes.

Q: So, it is a doorway, so to speak?
A: Doorway as are many.

Q: How many of these objects are in our solar system?
A: Two.

Q: Where is the other one?
A: Outside, on the fringe of the solar system.

Q: Is the government, or some faction or department, aware of this object?
A: Yes.

Q: Anything else you can tell us about this object?
A: No need.

[Break to look at photographs.]

Q: Now, in terms of the photographs of this object, it looks sort of like two cylindrical objects with a dome or energy flow arc at the top. Could you tell us what we were seeing.
A: The object.

Q: Was it two part?
A: No.

Q: What was this arc looking part? Part of the spherical part?
A: Your visual perspective.

Q: Are the two cylindrical parts aspects of the hexagonal shape extending down from a spherical cap?
A: Close.

Q: Now, related in a general sort of way, there is Ong’s Hat, Emory Cranston, and the Incunabula Papers. Supposedly they are like a “democratic time travel” group. There are claims that they were raided some years back, several of them were killed, and there is quite a story behind this group. Is Ong’s Hat what it claims to be?
A: No.

Q: Is Ong’s Hat a cover for some sort of covert government operation?
A: No.

Q: IS Ong’s Hat a group of people who are actually experimenting with time travel?
A: Close.

Q: Are they experimenting with physical time travel, or time travel via consciousness?
A: both, but with limited success.

Q: Were they actually raided by the “powers that be,” and were some of them killed as is claimed in the story?
A: Yes.

Q: Who is Emory Cranston? I have heard it is a pseudonym...
A: Pseudoscientist.

Q: Do you mean he really knows what he is doing, or he just has a good clue as to what he is doing?
A: Latter.

Q: Is there any benefit to us to pursue this “Ong’s Hat” clue?
A: Not really.

Q: Okay, Philip K. Dick wrote this book called V.A.L.I.S., meaning Vast Active Living Intelligence or Information System. Some of his information was strikingly similar to the information we have received through this source. He obviously wasn’t prepared for this in the same way that Don Elkins was not prepared for the Ra Material, and it caused a lot of problems in his life. Was Philip Dick channelling something like a Sixth Density source?
A: Not much of the time, but in part.

Q: Was he being abducted by aliens?
A: Interaction.

Q: Did he actually live in another universe...
A: No.

Q: He didn’t live in another branch of the universe where Germany won the war and everything was horrible?
A: No.

Q: Why did he have these memories of having lived in another time and then...
A: Genius is next to insanity.

Q: So, he was a genius in his ideas, but they unbalanced him?
A: Close.

Q: He claims to have had a couple of experiences very similar to some I have had; and in these experiences he claims to have actually seen the underlying reality matrix... he saw the universe as it really is, in its nature of flowing lights and colors and so forth, as it reformed, so to speak... was he seeing 4th density?
A: Close.

Q: We have been discussing the possiblity of Rigel going supernova as has been suggested in the past, and the arrival of the optical effects being conducive to DNA changes in human beings. Is this, in fact, possible or probable?
A: Yes.

Q: Are the optical effects of the supernova the same as The Wave?
A: Do not get ahead of yourself. The Wave will be apparent when it arrives.

Q: Is this wave different from the optical effects of the supernova?
A: Yes.

Q: Is this wave related to the supernova in some way?
A: No.

Q: Are only those who have a certain frequency going to transition to 4th density, or is it that the whole planet is going to transition and folks don’t really have a choice in the matter?
A: Complex issues, suggest you accept dualities rather than uniformities.

Q: Well, what I am trying to get at is: will those who transition to 4th density, for all intents and purposes, disappear to those who remain at third density?
A: We have discussed options before, for your perusal.

Q: Well, I have read them, and have posted them, but some folks don’t quite understand. They want to understand if people will experience this as a sort of “Rapture” event where people just disappear?
A: But the definitive answer they seek is predicated upon uniformity of experience based upon the typical 3rd density linear time model.

Q: Another question along this line: one reader noted that the last time the “Wave” arrived, there were 6 billion people on the planet. And now, it is supposed to be coming again, and we are again in that ballpark in terms of population. So, the question is: is this sort of like a marker for the Wave, sort of like a critical mass?
A: Numbers don’t mark. Psychic aural fields of energy mark.

Q: I have two last questions: at one point you said to note the “struggle out of sequence with pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines.” Now, of course, I made the remark about usurpation of a throne, but later I realized that we don’t really know what the pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines really are. They don’t necessarily have to do with a secular position, they could be a function. What are the pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines?
A: Control.

Q: Control of what? People?
A: Close.

Q: Control of the reality in some sense?
A: Not as close.

Q: Control as in STS domination?
A: Yes.

Q: Are there any other pre-ordained activities?
A: Need there be?

Q: Okay, “struggle out of sequence.” Loss of control? The royal bloodlines lose control?
A: Only when energies build prior to completion of cycle.

Q: What sign am I looking for? Struggle out of sequence... a rebellion that breaks out... a particular cycle to these events... a period of time?
A: You need to review.

Q: I want to clarify the issue of Jesus’ wives. The first time we asked, you said that Jesus was not married, but had three children with three Roman women. The second time we asked, you said he had a wife, Anatylenia, and had three children with this one woman. My question is: did he have six children, three with one woman, and one each with three other women?
A: No.

Q: He had a wife and not the three Roman women?
A: No.

Q: Did he have a wife?
A: Three women, all were wives, in the “Biblical sense.”

Q: Now, Anatylenia was one of these Roman women?
A: Yes.

Q: Who were here parents? What was her patronym?
A: Sermalain and Galleinia.

Q: There were three children, one from each woman?
A: Yes.

Q: Male and female children?
A: Yes.

Q: How many of these children were male?
A: Two.

Q: Two boys and one girl.

Q: What was the name of the boys?
A: No, not for tonight’s session. Low energy now. So, goodnight.

End of Session

Back to Contents

January 22, 2000

Q: Hello.
A: Hello.

Q: And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Anoova.

Q: And where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea.

Q: As you know, the morning after the last session, I woke up in extreme pain. It took several weeks to get this under control, and all the physical efforts seemed to have little or no effect. I went to the chiropractor, I had acupuncture, massage, ice, heat, you name it. I would like to know what was the cause of this physical attack?
A: Tenseness, aggravated by sleep posture and psychic tear in medial collateral veil of etheric body. This leads to “opportunistic” invasion of energies intent upon harm.

Q: What was the cause of the weakening of the etheric body, or the “tear” you have identified?
A: Emotional/psychic distress relating to original malady, and weakened resistance of etheric protection system.

Q: When you mention an “original malady,” what do you mean, specifically?
A: Muscular. Think of it as the etheric equivalent of bacteria invading a cavity.

Q: So, something broke through the veil of an etheric nature?
A: Yes.

Q: Can we identify them?
A: Represented by those who wish you were not as aware and as communicative as you are; i.e. 4th density STS.

Q: Was it a spirit attachment, or was it more like a pipeline pumping in negative energy?
A: Closer to latter. Recent events indicate attack. Vigilance should be powered up! Ark has also been “under the gun.”

Q: So, we should be expecting attack?
A: Expecting it then countering it thusly.

Q: What aspect of our lives, which of our activities, was the origin of the weakness: financial, emotional, or what?
A: The origin is not nearly so important as the awareness/vigilance.

Q: Well, the upcoming attack mode you have identified: is it going to be psychic, emotional, financial, or what?
A: Psychic, of course. This can affect all other realms obviously! We have discussed this before. And, be always aware. The more exposure you have, the more potential portals come into the picture.

Q: Are you alluding to the upcoming article Tom French is writing?
A: Yes, and the website, etc...

Q: Well, if that is the case, ought we to tone down what we are putting on the website?
A: Awareness does not usually require concession.

Q: Any specific advice?
A: Vigilance is the key.

Q: (A) The original question was “why did this come about just after the last session?” Considering that all of the recent sessions have been very draining, and that seems to indicate that some element of corruption has been coming through.
A: Awareness negates that.

Q: If you are aware that you are being drained, then the obvious solution is to stop having the sessions.
A: No. Aware that attempts will be made to drain.

Q: What was it, in particular, about this last session that made me so vulnerable? Lack of awareness?
A: Close.

Q: You had said that the channel was “grooved” and that other forces couldn’t “horn in” any longer. So, I was being comfortable with that idea...
A: If you have bacterial invasion of your oral cavity, awareness of this
prompts you to gargle with peroxide.

Q: What is the equivalent of gargling with peroxide after doing a session?
A: Awareness leads to mental/psychic resolve that “will not be drained, the attack will not succeed.”

Q: (A) In what sense was I “under the gun?”
A: Injuries/maladies.

Q: The flu and your toe, I guess. Is there any other thing on this attack issue; any area where we are most vulnerable that we need to pay attention?
A: Just be aware of all portals.

Q: Could this have a financial effect on us?
A: It could, but if vigilant, less apt to occur.

Q: Do you see the job situation as being stable for the time being?
A: Mostly.

Q: Mostly is not completely!
A: What could affect this?

Q: Well, they recently started making noises about creating a position at the company for regular employment, designed, it seemed, for Ark to apply. He did not do so because he was advised that, if he did, it would put him in a far more precarious position. He would not have a contract, being a regular employee, he could be fired summarily, which this bunch seems to do from time to time, the benefits are lousy, he would have to work IN the building instead of at home; it just was not an attractive option. Then, we found out that a couple of people DID apply for the position, and they were only offered 30 thousand a year, which is pennies. So, will they take the fact that Ark did NOT apply for this position askance, or are they trying to get somebody in there to take the position so that he is no longer necessary? Those are some of my concerns. Besides, this is a REALLY weird company! They just collect government money and do nothing!
A: Like a front, yes?

Q: Yeah. What’s it a front for? Well, maybe they will keep Ark, they can keep up appearances! They can say that somebody is really doing something! Any comment?
A: No.

Q: (A) Now, I contacted IBR, Santilli, and kind of announced that I am interested in a grant that they have advertised. Apparently, on Monday, I will call Santilli and arrange a meeting, perhaps. I would like to know if I am entering some potentially dangerous involvement, or if I am entering into something which potentially can bring good future opportunities? I would like to have some advice here?
A: More likely the latter.

Q: (A) What approach is good...
A: Straightforward.

Q: (A) Also, since we are talking about this job situation, I would like to ask about this Miami opening which I applied for, but its part of the game. What chances do you see of getting this, or another position because of this application?
A: Your future is better served as an independent agent. When you are working within the confines of realms controlled by others, you are quite vulnerable.

Q: Now, we have this picture of this sort of “track” on the Moon here. It is 29 KM long and about 1 KM wide, and they are calling it a “landing strip.”
Well, it’s pretty big to be a landing strip, in my opinion. What is it?
A: Residue of ancient mining operation.

Q: How ancient, by our calendar?
A: 350,000 years, approximately.

Q: In specific, how does this mark relate to a mining operation? Was it like strip mining, or where mining machines were driving back and forth, or what?
A: Underground channel mining.

Q: So, it is a depression caused by an underground mine. What was being mined?
A: Lignite and gold.

Q: Who was doing the mining?
A: Who made you?

Q: Orions?
A: Yes.

Q: What did they use this lignite and gold for?
A: Conduction of electromagnetism.

Q: Did they take this material out of our solar system to use elsewhere?
A: Some.

Q: (A) I don’t understand something here. These alchemists, who were not so clever as 4th density, were apparently able to produce gold. Now, these Orions who are so much more advanced, one would suppose, could not do transmutation, but needed to engage in mining? If they are so clever, why couldn’t they transmute iron to gold? Why did they have to mine the gold?
A: Have to? Not necessarily. Greed dictates that when it is there for the taking, do so. Does the counterfeiter walk away from a stash of cash?

Q: I had a dream the other night that somehow we travelled in time, to the past, and for some reason it was the period of time in which Nostradamus lived, and we encountered him. There were people watching us, and these people decided that we, along with Nostradamus, were to be burned at the stake for sorcery. During this interaction with Nostradamus, we learned from him that he was also a time traveller from the future, though from a different timeline than ours. We had intersected with him at this particular point in our past. It seemed to be very important that Nostradamus NOT be burned at the stake, important for the future of humanity. But, we couldn’t get back to the future. People who were monitoring events from the future saw the difficulty, and they sent reinforcements, and were going to kill off all these people who were trying to burn us all at the stake. It seemed to be more important that HE continue to exist, though they didn’t care a lot about whether we did so or not, though we were saved as a sort of byproduct of this activity. So, we got saved from being burned at the stake. I was taken by this group who had come back into the past, and they had disguised me and were sending me to a convent, but Ark and some others came along and rescued me. We realized that we were stuck in the past, and could do nothing but hope that someone from the future was going to come back and save us, or to find our time machine and fix it, so we decided to live our lives as part of this past situation, while at the same time, keeping our eyes open for our chance to get out of there. We started a horse farm as a “cover” for our activities. The last thing was a remark made at the end of the dream saying that I was descended from Nostradamus on my Knight side of the family, and that was why we “intersected” with him in our time travel excursion. That made me a descendant in the future, of somebody who had traveled into the past from a different future and had gotten stuck there... tell me about this dream!
A: Well, check out the genealogy.

Q: Was, Nostradamus a time traveller into the past, which is why he wrote all these prophecies that were partially, or occasionally accurate, but in general, not? Is it because his travel into the past CHANGED the future?
A: Maybe, at the soul level. But then again, who is to say that the same does not apply to you all now!?!

Q: I was thinking about time travel when I went to sleep that night. I wasn’t thinking about Nostradamus, for sure, but I was pondering time travel. The thing I was thinking about was that, for some reason, we are all going about it in the wrong direction. Time travel is, in my opinion, a lot easier than we suspect, though I can’t quite wrap my mind around what it is we are missing here. Can you help me out here? People keep thinking in terms of a) collapsing the gravity wave so that time around stops; or b) going faster than light so that time stops in that way. Either of those two approaches seems to be going at it backward, but I can’t explain why. What is it that I am trying to get my mind to grab onto that is slipping away?
A: Changing channels.

Q: Changing channels? You mean you can change channels to do it?
A: Yes. All is present, there is your illusion.

Q: Is the changing of channels something that is accomplished internally, like in the physiological structure, or in the mental/psychic/soul structure?
A: More complex.

Q: But, you said before that one has to generate an electromagnetic field, a la Tesla coils, do you have to have massive amounts of power in order to change channels and time travel?
A: That is the pathway accessible from 3rd density.

Q: How much power do you have to have?
A: Let us just say that GIGAWATT is the term of choice.

Q: Okay, if you are generating a magnetic field, and you “change the channel,” is it from that immediate point within this field, that you can access a channel of some sort, and move into a different timeline. I mean, is it like being suddenly placed at the center of a spider web, with all the times available all around one, and it is a matter of direction of choice?
A: Something like that.

Q: What kind of device, or control system would you use to select the proper channel? Is this strictly a mental activity, or is there something that you use to select a frequency which resonates with a particular time, or channel, and you have to experiment to figure out which time is which frequency?
(A) How do we tune?
A: Your suggestion of mental imagining’s good.

Q: So you have to be able to create a mental image, which means that you must HAVE a mental image of something that is fairly accurate that will pull you into the right “time line.” You have to have a marker, a significant marker!
A: Dates will do.

Q: If dates will do, and the calendar has been screwed with so much, do you use the concept of say, “2000 years before today,” ignoring conventional calendrical systems? Is that it?
A: One method.

Q: Well, clearly, if you are traveling backwards and forwards in time, you want to move into the timeline in a discreet manner. You don’t want to just appear in the middle of a street in a busy city with a bunch of people standing around staring at your materialization, who immediately grab you and burn you at the stake. So, if that is the case, perhaps you want to select your location as well as your time. And, how can you select a location without having an image, and how can you know that your image of the location is correct if...
A: Your are assuming immediate appearance in the visual spectrum as recognized by 3rd density.

Q: So, assuming that one materializes immediately is apparently not so.
A: It is not necessarily so.

Q: So, you can time travel and remain invisible? Sort of in an ethereal state, and then opt, at any point, to become more solid?
A: If you have skill/knowledge. If not, it could indeed be a “crapshoot.”

Q: Is that 7-11 you win; snake eyes you lose!?
(A) But this time travel
involves TransDimensional Remolecularization.
(L) I guess, if you have the skill it does, but if not, it doesn’t. Very interesting. I have been looking at the French cave paintings which are so obviously superior to later prehistoric art, and I started thinking that maybe these caves could be what time travellers use as their points of entry and departure.
(A) Suppose you time travel, can some other beings, even advanced humans, see you on a screen or something? In other words, when you time travel, can they monitor you? Kill you, block you? Are they “watching” to make sure that nobody time travels? Is there some sort of “time travel police,” as was suggested in a movie I once saw? Is this possible?
A: Can be monitored, but only to a limited extent.

Q: Is time travel something that is going to be a significant part of our future?
A: Yes, absolutely!!!

Q: This dream I had, when we appeared in this other reality, we came tumbling down a chute of some sort, through the castle wall, and landed on our bottoms in this hallway with people walking back and forth! We were standing in a field one minute, and the next minute there we were! We weren’t even dressed appropriately.
(F) Yes, it would be hard to explain to Henry VIII who Calvin Klein is!
(L) But, on the other hand, there is always the possibility that time travel could include transferring your focus of consciousness from one of your “selves” in one time period to another of your selves in another period, what we would call another “incarnation.” You just change your focus.
A: These all are reality. And of course, the UFO issue is tied into this too.

Q: Now, that reminds me: we have this bizarre picture here of this absolutely strange creature in a museum in Germany. So, speaking of time travel and UFOs, what is this 265 year old creature kept in formaldehyde?
A: Hybridized conception/gestate.

Q: Was there hybridization and genetic manipulation going on almost 300 years ago?
A: Most done this way are miscarried.

Q: Did it live at all after birth?
A: No.

Q: Who was responsible for this experiment?
A: It was not an experiment. It was the result of Reptoid “rape.”

Q: So, the mother was raped by a reptoid. Why do reptoids rape human women?
A: We have discussed motives.

Q: Yes. They feed on the fear, terror, or absorb some substance emitted by the sexual organs and chakra, and in some cases they are “changing the genetic program.” But, in general, when we have discussed this, it has not included impregnating human women with Reptoid sperm. How often does this activity result in impregnation?
A: Rarely.

Q: So, in this case it did, and here is the result. Pretty horrible. We have been puzzling for some time over a remark you once made that, at 4th density, there is no right or left. How can we conceptualize this?
A: It is difficult of you to conceive of this. Directionals exist within the perceived limitations of your reality.

Q: Are you saying that at 4th density, an individual exists as a “point consciousness” and there is no materiality unless you will it to be so?
A: Close.

Q: (A) Does it have anything to do with the fact that, on a mobius strip, there is no right or left?
A: Yes.

Q: A mobius strip is not so difficult to think about at all. I also know about mathematics in which you can add extra dimension which can change left into right. It is not a problem. Should we think about something like this?
A: If everything is in reality circular in nature, then direction is optional.

Q: (L) We have been having a little discussion on our mailgroup, and one participant commented that our remarks about the Lizzies makes it seem that we are thinking of them in terms of “cosmic niggers,” as she put it. She is focused on unifying the dark and the light within herself. She has suggested that STS and STO might not be the only options to choose, that there might be other options that we are not aware of. She thinks that choosing one or the other boils down to choosing one side AGAINST the other. She wondered what you would say about our apparent “racisim” regarding the Lizzies. I responded that the Lizzies were, in realty, cosmic Nazis. But, the bottom line is that she more or less wants to “love” Lizzies.
A: When one “desires,” one is expressing STS.

Q: (A) Does this also relate to desire for knowledge?
A: Yes.

Q: So, in our drive to obtain knowledge, we are STS?
A: You are STS, period.

Q: But, once we have knowledge, we become STO?
A: No.

Q: But, you are always saying that we should seek to gain knowledge. You are supposed to be STO, and we are supposed to be STO candidates, so how does that...
A: While you are in this realm, you are by nature STS. Gaining knowledge is a separate issue.

Q: So, I guess that if you are in a realm where you can’t help but be STS, then you ought to be STS about gaining knowledge, because it is the only thing that can assist in changing.
(A) There are different ways to desire something. One has the choice of WHAT to desire.
(L) Now, there is a lot of talk about the imminent stockmarket crash, so I put up the financial info on the site without any specific advice. Could you comment on this potential for a major crash or depression happening this year?
A: Is there not always an “imminent” crash/depression?

Q: Of course there is! It’s like the Weekly World News predicting the imminent End of the World about once a month. Eventually, they will be right! (A) Maybe not.
(L) Well, another thing that was brought up in our discussion with this new gal in the mail group was that nothing of any importance of significance would happen in terms of transition on the earth for at least another thousand years or so. She was saying that we would slowly transform for the next thousand years, and there would be no cataclysms or earth changes. I am wondering if this is a new option that has come up because of changes in consciousness?
A: It may be. But remember, the “future” is merely a matter of which reality one experiences in real time, so called. It is merely which of those that exist shall the menu selectors elect?

Q: I am curious. Now we have the big 05-05-2000 coming up. I was reading something about this today. Apparently on this date, the planets line up in conjunction with the peak of the solar cycle and there is supposed to be the “Big Kahuna” of earthquakes or whatever. What is the liklihood of the majority of people experiencing THAT timeline?
A: 0.1

Q: (A) Many people are saying that the most probably date of earth change is 2012. That falls in what you previously you gave as an outside limit of the arrival of the comet cluster, twin sun business; in the middle, in fact. Of course, it may never happen, but is this still the case?
A: Maybe...

Q: (A) Is this a better probability than 0.1?
A: Between 0.1 and 100.

Q: [Laughter] (F) Well, THAT narrows it down!
(L) As you know, Tom French
is finishing the article and it is supposed to be published either on January 30th or February 13. They have turned it into a “love story,” and you guys are being presented as “cosmic matchmakers.” Comment, please.
A: News media are mischievous.

Q: One thing about it is probably is that everybody who wants to find their soul mate will be on the line asking you guys to find theirs! That is a distinct possibility!
(F) Along with requests for lotto numbers! Yes, and for $59.95 we will be happy to oblige. No refunds! [Laughter]

(L) Hmmmm.... is that a good idea?
A: Yes.

Q: There you have it!
(F) Yes, they can pay or shut up! If people are going to seek you out for their own benefits, they will just have to pay up. You would never have a moment’s peace otherwise. Every 15 minutes the phone would ring.
(L) What an interesting idea.
(F) How could you not have thought of it?
(L) Well, because we have never charged anybody anything. Never.
(A) Yes. Cash only.
(F) The point is, you are not soliciting business. It will solicit you. But... if we are going to all be involved in this solicitation of advice from the Cassiopaeans, we should ALL profit! The thing I am concerned about is not so much the positive fallout, but the negative fallout.

(L) What is the possibility of the negative fallout; aside from being attacked by the fundamentalists, crosses being burned on our lawn, and all that.
(F) Well, it all depends on the content. If Tom is fast and loose with his words, or the editor is - well, it could be a problem.
(A) Now, we were discussing this right and left business, and you were suggesting that there were many, many time loops, and the space/time is fractal or something like that, and that this is the reason that there is no right or left. I had a different idea that these time loops exist, and yes, maybe space/time is fractal, but that this absence of left and right has to do with access to real, big, huge, extra dimensions. You somehow stressed this nonexistence of the distinction between left and right, and because you stressed this, I would like to know which way to go with my math. Any comment?
A: Best to place options before us for response.

Q: (A) The options are 1) Fractality of space/time becomes relevant in higher densities; and 2) Additional dimension and hyperspace available.
A: Choose option 2.

Q: I would like to find out how Terry and Jan are doing.
A: Pondering return.

Q: Why?
A: Not comfortable with move.

Q: I saw my daughter this evening and she wouldn’t even look at me or speak to me. Why?
A: Negative feelings, exercised by confrontations with inner truths/conflicts.

Q: Jason and I were discussing the situation, and we were thinking that if my mother lives long enough, the girls will eventually learn about her. But, if she dies before they learn, they will never figure it out and will always think I am the bad guy.
A: No. Rebellious offspring are inevitable, to some extent. But it is not permanent, nor your responsibility.

Q: I dreamed the other night that my brother died. This was upsetting to me. Should I tell him about this dream; give him some sort of warning? Was it a warning to me? How should I respond to this?
A: How?

Q: Do you mean “how did he die?”
A: Yes.

Q: Well, it was a heart attack, I guess.
A: Then, warnings should help.

Q: Is it a possibility that my brother is going to die of a heart attack?
A: Well, all such possibilities exist for all, to some extent.

Q: I remember having three death dreams, but they seem now, to have been dreams of my impending divorce. So, I was wondering if this dream about him could have been a signal of some impending change in his situation.
A: Maybe, but best to make aware.

Q: Anything else?
A: No. Good night.

End of Session

Back to Contents

February 5, 2000

Q: Hello.
A: Hello.

Q: And who do we have with us this evening?
A: Tiannih.

Q: And where do you transmit through?
A: Cassiopaea.

Q: Okay, we have a bit of a problem here. I would like to ask some personal questions without fear of being thought too STS.
A: It is STS, but so be it.

Q: Has there been a major change in Tom French’s attitude lately?
A: No.

Q: Has Tom always thought that I was a little crazy?
A: Yes.

Q: How did he manage to conceal this from me? I mean, I perceived interest and intellectual participation. How did he maintain this facade?
A: Interest in his subject.

Q: What is his subject as he sees it?
A: You.

Q: Well, how does he see me?
A: Fascinating woman.

Q: Why does he not convey THAT in his article as much as he conveys that he thinks I am crazy?
A: He does not view you as “crazy” in the literal sense. Rather, he views you as a wild eccentric, using eccentricity as your own personal mode of surviving the struggles common to all humanity. More overview needed. Mister French does indeed like you, Laura. In fact, it would not be entirely inaccurate to say that there even has been some prurient interest there at times... But, such is the state with this soul. He does not intend to cause harm. But he has repeatedly misjudged the depth of your being, often trying to label. He still does not quite get it. But, his domain does not contain as much depth as yours. Try to understand, the concept of 6th density light beings is as foreign to him as professional wrestling is to you.

Q: (F) But, that begs the question: how familiar is professional wrestling to him?
(L) I suppose that he is working on the changes we have discussed. Is this the case?
A: To some extent.

Q: Are there any other changes that we ought to ask him to make?
A: Maybe a little.

Q: What is the most probable and likely result of the article with the changes that are being made, and as it will come out, following the present probabilities?
A: Bouquets and daggers. Fame and infame. But, Laura, Freddie, and Arkadiusz: such is the state of the realm in which you now reside... If you cannot stand the heat, get out of the kitchen... But if you leave the kitchen, you will miss the aroma. In general, those predisposed to react positively will do so, regardless of literary content, and vice versa.

Q: I guess it is as it is, and that is that. How are the girls going to react to this thing? I am so worried about Anna being upset.
A: Anna is less vulnerable at this point. She may view any “questionable” content as simple vindication of already existing negative feelings toward you. In other words, she may externalize rather than internalize.

Q: How is L going to react to finding out that I thought he was a robotoid?
A: You should nip that one.

Q: Is this story going to have positive or negative effects on Tom’s career, aside from its effects on us?
A: More positive.

Q: (A) Is there anything important which we should try to have changed beyond what we have already thought of? Is there anything important, that can make a difference, that has not occurred to us?
A: Well, it is late in the game for very much more revision. However, this may serve to attract further outside interest.

Q: The article will attract further outside interest?
A: Yes, tv, news, authors, publishers, etc... Remember, the Saint Petersburg Times has a well visited web site, too!

Q: Well, why do we feel like we are waiting for the guillotine to fall on our heads?
A: Guillotine will miss its mark if one retracts head.

Q: Back during the time before Tom and Cherie got their divorces, I had a dream that they DID get divorced, and in the dream was the clear suggestion that they got divorced to be together. But, in the end, Cherie changed her mind. However, it seems that Tom is the one who has changed his mind and Cherie has been wondering why?
A: All chapters to that story have not yet been written.

Q: Tom has a new girlfriend, Madeline. We have the suspicion that Tom’s new girlfriend has been sent in to obfuscate him, to have some sort of influence over him. Is this perception anywhere near accurate?
A: Somewhere near.

Q: What does Madeline want from Tom?
A: Not sure.

Q: What does Madeline really think of Tom?
A: Ditto.

Q: Is there anything you CAN tell us about Madeline and Tom?
A: She cannot tell, not us. We would describe what Tom seeks from her, but to utilize your popular parlance: “you do not want to go there!”

Q: Well, what would be Cherie’s best course of action at present?
A: Patience pays. Niceness is usually the best option.

Q: What is the deal with this Santilli business? Do they have a machine that is producing free energy, or at least more energy comes out than is put in?
A: No.

Q: Are they opposed to the idea of having somebody come in an have a look because that person might discover that their claims are greatly overrated? Are they using these claims as a lure to get government funding?
A: Will not get government funding. These people must not be aware that the “government” is fully aware of how to produce “free” energy. Some private sources, European in nature, may be interested, though.

Q: Are they trying to attract funding fraudulently?
A: More clumsy than fraudulent.

Q: It’s really sad that Santilli is involved with such flakey people!
(F) Hasn’t he always been?
(L) He is certainly influenced by the wrong people! And I don’t think we want anything to do with him at all.
(A) Now, we we were talking about Kaluza Klein, and you mentioned the Germans “exploring the loop of the cylinder” in relation to time travel. I don’t know what this means but I have the idea that it is related to extra dimensions, hyperspace. Now, we asked a question at some point and you said that a cylinder is really a double loop. You then suggested that we meditate on the true meaning of this sentence. Now, I don’t know how to meditate, but I do know how to do math. So, I drew three pictures here: one is a real cylinder, two is a which is a kind of cylinder inside a cylinder, and three, like a torus. Laura said that it wasn’t any of these, that it should only have one side like a cylinder/mobius strip - no left and no right. So, this could be option 4, something like a Klein bottle or option 5, something called a twisted torus. Is it 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5? Or 6, none of the above? Is it one of these?
A: Selection 3.

Q: 3 is the torus.
(L) What is a loop of the cylinder? Yes, there is one loop and then there is another loop. One loop is probably what we call time - cyclical time.
A: Time cycle.

Q: What is the second loop?
A: Included, but not inclusive.

Q: I guess that means that it is included, but is not the whole thing. It covers that, but that isn’t the whole thing. What DOES it mean?
A: Yes.

Q: Wait, I asked what is the second loop. The second loop is included but not inclusive?
A: Remember, you do have cycles but that does not necessarily mean cyclical. 3 Dimensional depiction of loop, seek hexagon for more. Geometric theory provides answers for key. Look to stellar windows. Octaon, hexagon, pentagon.

Q: Are those the different levels of density?
A: No, but it relates. Geometry gets you there, algebra sets you “free.”

Q: That’s funny. There is Tony Smith’s website, and whenever I search for any keyword that comes up here, I go straight to Tony Smith. He has everything there.
(L) But, does he know what he is doing?
(A) Well, he has it all there. He is now working on a new theory of gravity.
(L) But, if he really knew something, would he be still walking around? Anything else?
A: No, not for now. Good night.

End of Session

Back to Contents