| 
			  
			  
			
  
			by Jesus DiazMay 21, 2014
 from 
			Gizmodo Website
 
 
 
 
			  
			
			 
			    
				
				"We can say little, if anything, 
				about what these patterns [above] signify, why they were cut 
				into rocks, or who created them. For all intents and purposes, 
				they might have been made by aliens."  
			When a new NASA book on alien 
			communications has a paragraph like that, you better pay 
			attention.    
			Of course, the scientists and scholars 
			who contributed to 
			'Archaeology, 
			Anthropology and Interstellar Communications' 
			- edited by Douglas A. Vakoch - are not saying these 
			carvings were made by aliens.    
			They're saying that, since we don't 
			really know the origin and meaning of these markings - which were 
			made thousands of years ago all cross Europe, America and India - we 
			can assume that they are made by aliens as a test to what 
			we may encounter when we actually make contact with a civilization 
			from another planet.    
			It's a serious book - deep and complex, 
			but quite accessible. I have been going through it and it is truly 
			fascinating stuff.    
			And I'm not only talking about the gem 
			at the top of this article: 
				
				Consider again, therefore, the 
				desirability of establishing symbolic/linguistic communication 
				with ETI [Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence].    
				It is helpful to review some 
				parallels from human existence that pose problems for us today. 
				One of these is "rock art," which consists of patterns or shapes 
				cut into rock many thousands of years ago. Such ancient stone 
				carvings can be found in many countries [...]    
				We can say little, if anything, 
				about what these patterns [above] signify, why they were cut 
				into rocks, or who created them. For all intents and purposes, 
				they might have been made by aliens.     
			
			 
			
			
			A replica of an unusual cup-and-ring-marked stone
			 
			
			from Dalgarven, North Ayrshire, 
			Scotland. 
				      
				The larger picture  
				That's only a tiny part of 
				a much larger logical chain that takes into consideration our 
				knowledge on historical and prehistorical Earth, as well as our 
				understanding of biology, evolution, and physics.    
				For example, after going through a 
				number of assumptions about the potential physical and 
				biophysical differences in Chapter 15 - titled Constraints 
				on Message Construction for Communication with Extraterrestrial 
				Intelligence - Vakoch writes about the implications:   
					
					
					Implications - I   
					If the reader accepts these 
					assumptions, then our first constraint on possible messages 
					is simple: don't think of 
					"sound worlds" or music or speech as the domains, vehicles, 
					or contents of ETI messages.    
					Regardless of semiotic concerns 
					(see below), the 
					accessibility of acoustic messaging must remain doubtful. 
					Furthermore, there will be intended and unintended aspects 
					of performance, which elaborate the difficulties of using 
					sound. In my view avoidance of the sound world need not be 
					controversial.    
					On the other hand,
					vision and the use of 
					images would appear to be at least plausible.
					   
					Although spectral details cannot 
					be considered universal, 
					the physical arrangement of objects on a habitable planet's 
					surface will be shaped in part by gravity (the notion of a 
					horizon might well be universal) and thus multispectral 
					images might plausibly be considered worthwhile for 
					messages.    
					More generally, the implications 
					for considering SETI/CETI as some sort of anthropological 
					challenge need teasing out.  
				Makes total sense to me.   
				I won't quote more of the book here 
				because that would be a worthless exercise, but so far - I'm 
				still eagerly reading it - it's a really great read.   
				It's comforting that NASA is 
				thinking about human-alien communication under a new focus, one 
				that is not purely based on the physical sciences of planetary 
				research or exobiology, but that ties it with our current 
				experience in trying to decipher our own archeological and 
				anthropological past.    
				That, according to Vakoch, is the 
				objective of this volume: 
					
					The chapters in this volume 
					combine incisive critique with hope that there is a response 
					to the skepticism behind these critiques.    
					Addressing a field that has been 
					dominated by astronomers, physicists, engineers, and 
					computer scientists, the contributors to this collection 
					raise questions that may have been overlooked by physical 
					scientists about the ease of establishing meaningful 
					communication with an extraterrestrial intelligence.   
					These
					scholars are grappling with 
					some of the enormous challenges that will face humanity if 
					an information-rich signal emanating from another world is 
					detected.    
					By drawing on issues at
					the core of contemporary 
					archaeology and anthropology, we can be much better 
					prepared for contact with an extraterrestrial civilization, 
					should that day ever come. 
			  
			  |