| 
			  
			
			  
			
			
  
			by Michael E. Salla, PhD 
			Exopolitical Comment # 41 
			February 18, 2006 
			from
			
			Exopolitics Website 
			  
			  
			In February 2006, 
			UFO Magazine released 
			an edition that focused on the
			
			Project Serpo, an alleged alien 
			exchange program from 1965-1978 that involved twelve US military 
			personnel who traveled to a planet ’Serpo’ in the 
			
			Zeta Reticulum 
			binary constellation.  
			  
			UFO Magazine had a number of statements by 
			some of the key figures involved in this unfolding case.  
			  
			Among these 
			statements was one by Richard Doty, a former Special Agent assigned 
			to the Air Force Office of Special 
			Investigations (AFOSI), 
			concerning what he directly experienced during his military service, 
			and how this corroborated parts of the Project Serpo story.  
			  
			  
			  
			 
			  
			  
			Doty is among a group of former 
			’insiders’ with access to classified information on UFOs that have 
			come forward to confirm parts of this alleged alien exchange program 
			leaked by up to three anonymous Defense Intelligence Agency 
			personnel.  
			  
			Doty is the most prominent of these former insiders due 
			to widespread public knowledge of his former position as an AFOSI 
			’special agent’ assigned with dealing with UFO reports from 1979 to 
			1988. 
 Doty’s testimony is most revealing since much of it is based on a 
			number of first hand experiences concerning classified information 
			as opposed to the hearsay testimonies of others.
 
			  
			Hearsay testimony 
			is easy to manipulate in the hands of skilled intelligence agents 
			participating in an officially sanctioned ’deception program’ aimed 
			at misleading researchers, witnesses and the general public over UFOs. Direct personal testimony of classified information directly 
			experienced is far more difficult to manipulate, especially when 
			published in print by an individual such as Doty whose background 
			and credentials are well known.  
			  
			Written statements on what an individual 
			has directly experienced can be checked and any inconsistencies can 
			be found. Consequently, it is useful to examine closely Doty’s 
			claims concerning his own personal experiences while responsible for 
			gathering UFO information as an AFOSI special agent, and the extent 
			to which this lends credence to the Project Serpo information.  
			  
			Doty 
			may be participating in an officially sanctioned ’acclimation 
			program’ to inform a skeptical public of UFO related information or 
			part of an elaborate ’deception program’ designed to mislead the 
			general public and researchers.
 Doty began his US Air Force career in 1968 and first trained for the 
			Air Force Security Police and later moved on to other security 
			related positions. He joined the Air Force Office of Special 
			Investigations (AFOSI) in 1979 and retired in 1988.
 
			  
			Both his father 
			(Charles Doty) and uncle (Ed Doty) reached the rank of Colonel in 
			the Air Force, and were both involved in investigating UFO reports 
			and were stationed with the 7602nd Air Intelligence Group (Exempt 
			from Disclosure, p. 118). Doty reached the rank of Master Sergeant 
			and upon retirement began a new career as a State Trooper in New 
			Mexico.  
			  
			He more recently finished law school and completed the New 
			Mexico State Bar Exam. 
 Doty co-authored with Robert Collins, 
			
			Exempt from Disclosure, a book 
			published in early 2005.
 
			  
			In it, Doty describes a number of first 
			hand experiences such as witnessing a large flying saucer at a 
			classified Indian Springs facility in 1969 (p. 67). More 
			significantly, Doty claims that he was given access to a highly 
			classified report that had much UFO related information in it 
			concerning extraterrestrial biological entities (EBEs), their 
			communication system and advanced technology (p. 70).  
			  
			Doty further 
			claims that in 1983 he had a face to face meeting at a secure 
			facility in Los Alamos, New Mexico with an extraterrestrial 
			biological entity called EBEN-2 from the constellation Zeta 
			Reticulum: 
				
				About five minutes later, in walks a 4’9" non-human looking 
			creature. It was dressed in a tight fitting cream-colored suit. It 
			had no hair was identified to me as EBE-2. EBE-2 sat in a chair 
			across the table from two civilians and the AF Colonel… I listened 
			while the three asked EBE-2 a series of questions pertaining to its 
			home planet (p. 154). 
			These are all first person experiences by 
			Doty concerning classified 
			UFO related information rather than hearsay. Thus they are 
			significant given Doty’s former position as an intelligence agent 
			assigned to UFO investigations.  
			  
			His involvement in UFO 
			investigations has been documented through his signature in official
			AFOSI complaint forms dating from 1980. 
			  
			  
			
 
				
					
						|   
						
						Information from
						
						
						NICAP Website 
						Document #: 11
 From: UFO INFO SERVICE
 Date Sent: 06-10-1986
 Subject: 1980 KIRTLAND AFB, NM
 
 
						FREEDOM OF 
						INFORMATION ACT DOCUMENT FILES 
						
						---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 COMPLAINT FORM
 ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
 
 TITLE DATE TIME
 --------------- ------
 KIRTLAND AFB, NM, 8 Aug - 3 Sep 2 - 9 Sept 80 1200
 80 Alleged Sighting of
 Unidentified Aerial Lights in
 Restricted Test Range. PLACE
 ---------------------------------------
 AFOSI Det 1700, Kirtland AFB, NM
 NOW RECEIVED
 Yes in person
 SOURCE OF EVALUATION
 Major Ernest E. Edwards
 RESIDENCE OR BUSINESS ADDRESS PHONE
 Commander, 1608 SPS, Manzano 4-7516
 Kirtland AFB, NM
 CR 44 APPLIES
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 REMARKS SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
 
 1. On 2 Sept 80, SOURCE related on 8 Aug 80, three 
						Security Policemen assigned to 1608 SPS, KAFB, NM, on 
						duty inside the Manzano Weapons Storage Area sighted an 
						unidentified light in the air that traveled from North 
						to South over the Coyote Canyon area of the Department 
						of Defense Restricted Test Range on KAFB, NM. The 
						Security Policemen identified as: SSGT STEPHEN FERENZ, 
						Area Supervisor, ATC MARTIN W. RIST and AMN ANTHONY 
						D.FRAZIER, were later interviewed separately by SOURCE 
						and all three related the same statement; at 
						approximately 2350 hrs., while on duty in Charlie 
						Sector, East Side of Manzano, the three observed a very 
						bright light in the sky approximately 3 miles 
						North-North East of their position. The light traveled 
						with great speed and stopped suddenly in the sky over 
						Coyote Canyon. The three first thought the object was a 
						helicopter, however, after observing the strange aerial 
						maneuvers (stop and go), they felt a helicopter couldn’t 
						have performed such skills. The light landed in the 
						Coyote Canyon area. Sometime later, three witnessed the 
						light take off and leave proceeding straight up at a 
						high speed and disappear.
 
 2. Central Security Control (CSC) inside Manzano, 
						contacted Sandia Security, who conducts frequent 
						building checks on two alarmed structures in area. They 
						advised that a patrol was already in the area and would 
						investigate.
 
 3. On 11 Aug 80, RUSS CURTIS, Sandia Security, advised 
						that on 9 Aug 80, a Sandia Security Guard, (who wishes 
						his name not be divulged for fear of harassment), 
						related the following: At approximately 0020 hrs., he 
						was driving east on the Coyote Canyon access road on a 
						routine building check of an alarmed structure. As he 
						approached the structure he observed a bright light near 
						the ground behind the structure. He also observed an 
						object he first thought was a helicopter. But after 
						driving closer, he observed a round disk shaped object. 
						He attempted to radio for backup patrol but his radio 
						would not work. As he approached the object on foot 
						armed with a shotgun, the object took off in a vertical 
						direction at a high rate of speed. The guard was a 
						former helicopter mechanic in the U.S. Army and stated 
						the object he observed was not a helicopter.
 
 4. SOURCE advised on 22 Aug 80, three other security 
						policemen observed the same aerial phenomena described 
						by the first three. Again the object landed in Coyote 
						Canyon. They did not see the object take off.
 
   
						Document #: 12
 From: UFO INFO SERVICE
 Date Sent: 06-10-1986
 Subject: 1980 KIRTLAND AFB, NM.
 
						FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT DOCUMENT FILES
 
						
						---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 CONTINUED FROM COMPLAL FORM 1, DTD 9 Sept 80
 
 5. Coyote Canyon is part of a large restricted test 
						range used by the Air Force Weapons Laboratory, Sandia 
						Laboratories, Defense Nuclear Agency and the Department 
						of Energy. The range was formerly patrolled by Sandia 
						Security, however, they only conduct building checks 
						there now.
 
 6. On 10 Aug 80, a New Mexico State Patrolman sighted an 
						aerial object land in the Manzano’s between Belen and 
						Albuquerque, NM. The Patrolman reported the sighting to 
						the Kirtland AFB Command Post, who later referred the 
						patrolman to the AFOSI Dist 17. AFOSI Dist 17 advised 
						the patrolman to make a report through his own agency. 
						On 11 Aug 80, the Kirtland Public Information office 
						advised the patrolman the USAF no longer investigates 
						such sighting unless they occur on a USAF base.
 
 7. WRITER contacted all the agencies who utilized the 
						test range and it was learned no aerial tests are 
						conducted in the Coyote Canyon area. Only ground test 
						are conducted.
 
 8. On 8 Sept 80, WRITER learned from Sandia Security 
						that another Security guard observed a object land near 
						an alarmed structure sometime during the first week of 
						August, but did not report it until justrecently for 
						fear of harassment.
 
 9. The two alarmed structures located within the area 
						contain HQ CR 44 material.
     
						DATE FORWARDED HQ AFOSI
 10 Aug 80 AFOSI FORM
 ----------------------------------------------------
 DATE TYPE OR PRINTED NAME OF SPECIAL AGENT
 Sept 80 Richard C Doty, SA
 ----------------------------------------------------
 DISTRICT FILE NO
 8017D93-0/29
 
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 Document #: 13
 From: UFO INFO SERVICE
 Date Sent: 06-10-1986
 Subject: 1980 KIRTLAND AFB, NM
 
						FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT DOCUMENT FILES
 
						
						---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 COMPLAINT FORM
 ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
 
 DATE TIME
 14 Aug 80 0730
 KIRTLAND AFB, NM 13 Aug 80, Possible Hostile 
						Intelligence Intercept Incident, PLACE Frequency 
						Jamming. AFOSI District 17, BID, KIRTLAND AFB, NM
 
 SOURCE AND EVALUATION
 1960th Communication
 Officer
 
 RESIDENCE OR BUSINESS ADDRESS
 1960 COMMSq KAFB, NM
 
 PHONE
 4-5098
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 REMARKS SUMMARY OF INFORMATION
 
 1. On 13 Aug 80, 1960 COMM Sq Maintenance Officer 
						reported Radar Approach Control equipment and scanner 
						radar inoperative due to high frequency jamming from an 
						unknown cause. Total blackout of entire radar approach 
						system to include Albuquerque Airport was in effect 
						between 1630-2215 hrs. Radar Approach Control back up 
						system also were inoperative.
 
 2. On 13 Aug 80, Defense Nuclear Agency Radio Frequency 
						Monitors determined, by vector analysis, the 
						interference was being sent from an area (V-90 degrees 
						or due East). On DAF map coordinates E-28.6. The area 
						was located NW of Coyote Canyon Test area. It was first 
						thought that Sandia Laboratory, which utilizes the test 
						range was responsible. However, after a careful check, 
						it was later determined that no test were being 
						conducted in the canyon area. Department of Energy, Air 
						Force Weapons Laboratory and DNA were contacted but 
						assured that their agencies were not responsible.
 
 3. On 13 Aug 80, Base Security Police conducted a 
						physical check of the area but because of the 
						mountainous terrain, a thorough check could not be 
						completed at that time. A later foot search failed to 
						disclose anything that could have caused the 
						interference.
 
 4. On 13 Aug 80, at 2216 hrs., all radar equipment 
						returned to normal operation without further incident.
 
 5. CONCLUSION: The presence of hostile intelligence 
						jamming cannot be ruled out. Although no evidence would 
						suggest this, the method has been used in the past. 
						Communication maintenance specialists cannot explain how 
						such interference could cause the radar equipment to 
						become totally inoperative. Neither could they suggest 
						the type or range of the interference signal. DNA 
						frequency monitors reported the interference beam was 
						wide spread and a type unknown to their electronical 
						equipment. Further checks of the area was being 
						conducted by Technical Services, AFOSI.
 
 6. High command interest item. Briefings requested IAW 
						AFOSIR 124-4 be completed at HQ AFOSI/IVOE. HQ CR 44 and 
						51 items.
 
   
						Document #: 14
 From: UFO INFO SERVICE
 Date Sent: 06-10-1986
 Subject: 1980 PROJ. AQUARIUS DOC.
 
						FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT DOCUMENT FILES
 
						
						---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 SECRET
 
 17 NOV 1980
 
 RTTEZYVW RUFLOJA9136
 ZNY S E C R E T
 GT
 SECRET FOR AFOSI ONLY
 R 171130Z NOV 80
 FM HQ AFOSI BOLLING AFB DC//IVOE
 TO RUWTFBA AFOSI DIST 17 KIRTLAND AFB NM//BID
 INFO 7602 AINTELG FT BELVOIR VA//INSR
 SECRET FOR AFOSI ONLY
 
						Ref: Request for Photo Imagery Interpretation Your MSG 
						292030Z Oct 80.
 Subject Case NR: 8017D93-126 HQ CR 44
 
						1. Subject Negatives/Film were analyzed by HQ IVT and 
						7602 AINTELG, it and the following results were found:
 
							
							A. 
							Negative #1: Depicting C-5A aircraft on approach and 
							streaking unidentified aerial object in lower right 
							portion of film. Film found to be unaltered. Size 
							differential was not consistent with size of 
							aircraft. Conclusion: Inconclusive 
							B. Negative #2: Depicting cylinder shaped 
							unidentified aerial object in upper left portion of 
							photo. Film found to be unaltered. Film showedobject 
							to be consistent with field depth and consistent 
							with relative size of fixed objects. Conclusion: 
							Legitimate negative of unidentified aerial object. 
							Bolton/Reinfeld method did not reveal visible 
							markings on object.
 
							C. Negative #3: Depicting irregular shaped 
							unidentified aerial object in seven frames of 8MM 
							film. Because of the size and apparent speed of 
							object no further classification or conclusion could 
							be drawn. Film shown to be unaltered.
 
							D. 34 inches of 8MM film: Depicting apparent 
							colored object moving in front of still camera. Film 
							found to be unaltered. Spectrography revealed colors 
							to be basic prism features. Depth analysis revealed 
							object to be within 152MM of camera. Object was not 
							consistent with relative size of fixed objects 
							observed for several seconds in film. Conclusion: 
							inconclusive.
 
							E. Original Negative Depicting Unidentified 
							Object: Film found to be unaltered. Because of a 
							lack of fixed objects in the film, no depth analysis 
							could be performed. Bolton, Reinfeld method revealed 
							object to be saucer shaped, approximate diameter 37 
							feet. Object contained a trilateral insignia on the 
							lower portion of object. Conclusion: Legitimate 
							negative of unidentified aerial object.
 
						2. Ref 
						your request for further information regarding HQ CR 44, 
						the following is provided: Capt. Grace 7602 Aintelg, INS 
						contacted and related following: (S/WINTEL) USAF no 
						longer publicly active in UFO research, however USAF 
						still has interest in all UFO sightings over USAF 
						installation/test ranges. Several other government 
						agencies, lead by NASA, actively investigates legitimate 
						sightings through covert cover. (S/WINTEL/FSA) 
						   
						3. One 
						such cover is UFO Reporting Center, US Coast and 
						Geodetic Survey, Rockville, MD 20852. NASA filters 
						results of sightings to appropriate military departments 
						with interest in that particular sighting. The official 
						US Government Policy and results of project Aquarius is 
						still classified top secret with no dissemination 
						outside official intelligence channels and with 
						restricted access to "MJ Twelve". Case on Bennewitz is 
						being monitored by NASA, INS, who request all future 
						evidence be forwarded to them thru AFOSI, IVOE. 
 
						4. Ref 
						your request for technical assistance. Because of a 
						chance of public disclosure, no knowledgeable personnel 
						with SPA will be provided. Continue to receive 
						assistance from individuals mentioned in your message, 
						Miller, fugate. Because of the sensitivity of case, 
						request they be thoroughly debriefed at regular 
						intervals.BTS
 NNNS
 DOWNGRADE 17NOV2020
 
   
						Document #: 15
 From: UFO INFO SERVICE
 Date Sent: 06-10-1986
 Subject: 1986 NSA REPLY AQUARIUS
 
						FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT DOCUMENT FILES
 
						
						---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY
 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE
 Fort George G. Meade, Maryland 20755-6000
 
 Serial: J9014C
 
 15 APR 1986
 
 This responds to your letter of 7 March 1986 in which 
						you further narrowed your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 
						request for records pertaining to Project Aquarius.
 
 The document located in response to your request as 
						stated in your 7 March letter has been reviewed by this 
						Agency as required by the FOIA and has been found to be 
						currently and properly classified in accordance with 
						Executive Order 12356. This document meets the criteria 
						for classification as set forth in subparagraphs 2, 4, 
						and 8 of section 1.3 and remains classified TOP SECRET 
						as provided in section 1.1 of Executive Order 12356. The 
						document is classified because its disclosure could 
						reasonably be expected to cause exceptionally grave 
						damage to the national security. Because the document is 
						currently and properly classified, it is exempt from 
						disclosure pursuant to the first exemption of the FOIA 
						(5 U.S.C. section 552(b) (1)).
 
 In addition, this Agency is authorized by various 
						statues to protect certain information concerning its 
						activities. We have determined that such information 
						exists in this document. Accordingly, those portions are 
						also exempt from disclosure pursuant to the third 
						exemption of the FOIA which provides for the withholding 
						of information specifically protected from disclosure by 
						statute. The specific statutes applicable in this case 
						are Title 18 U.S. Code 798; Title 50 U.S. Code 403(d) 
						(3); and Section 6, Public Law 86-36 (50 U.S. Code 402 
						"note").
 
 No portion of the information is reasonably segregable.
 
 Since your request has been denied, you are hereby 
						advised of this Agency’s appeal procedures.
 
 Any person denied access to information may, within 45 
						days after notification of the denial, file an appeal to 
						the NSA/CSS Freedom of Information Act Appeal Authority. 
						The appeal shall be in writing addressed to the NSA/CSS 
						FOIA Appeal Authority, National Security Agency, Fort 
						George G. Meade, MD 20755-6000. The appeal shall 
						reference the initial denial of access and shall 
						contain, in sufficient detail and particularity, the 
						grounds upon which the requester believes release of the 
						information is required. The NSA/CSS Appeal Authority 
						shall respond to the appeal within 20 working days after 
						receipt.
 
 In your letter, you take exception to the amount 
						requested by this Agency for manpower and computer 
						search fees to process your original request for all 
						information on Project Aquarius. Please be advised that 
						NSA search and duplication fees are computed in 
						accordance with guidance promulgated in sections 6-201 
						and 6-202 of Dod Directive 5400.7-R
 
 Sincerely,
 
 JULIA B. WETZEL
 Director of Policy
 
 =======================================================
 
 
						
						---------------------------C U F O N
 ---------------------------
 Computer UFO Network
 
 Seattle Washington, USA
 
 (206) 776-0382 8 Data Bits, No Parity, 1 Stop Bit 
						300/1200/2400 bps.
 
 SYSOP - Jim Klotz Information Director - Dale Goudie
 
 UFO Reporting and Information Service
 Voice Line - (206) 721-5035
 P.O.Box 832, Mercer Island, WA 98040, USA
 
 - Please credit CUFON as the source of this material -
   |  
			
			
 
			  
			  
			
			In his 
			statement published in UFO Magazine, Doty made a number of 
			claims supporting the validity of the Project Serpo information 
			despite a number of anomalies pointed out by critics.  
			  
			
			He claims that 
			when he started his service at AFOSI he was briefed on a compartment 
			program involving EBEs and alien crashes near Corona and Datil, New 
			Mexico. In Exempt from Disclosure, he described a captured alien 
			from one of these crashes, EBE-1, from the planet "Sieu" in the 
			constellation Zeta Reticulum was in military custody from 1947 until 
			its death in 1952 (p. 70).  
			  
			
			Doty claims in his statement that in 1984 
			he was given another briefing where he read a document that 
			"mentioned an exchange program between an alien race and twelve U.S. 
			military personnel" that lasted from 1965-1978. He claims he didn’t 
			see the details of this classified project but knew of its 
			existence. 
 Doty’s statement and chapters from Exempt from Disclosure describing 
			his personal experiences with flying saucers, EBEs and classified 
			UFO briefing documents, are startling admissions for a former AFOSI 
			special agent. The information Doty disclosed was by his own 
			admission highly classified and compartmented back in 1984, and 
			certainly still highly classified today. So why would former special 
			agent Doty reveal such classified compartmented information and how 
			accurate is it?
 
 Most UFO researchers aware of Richard Doty know of the unscrupulous 
			role he played in UFO cases involving 
			 
			
			Paul Bennewitz and Linda 
			Moulton Howe in the 1980’s.
 
			  
			
			Doty actively disseminated 
			disinformation to throw these two researchers off the track in their 
			respective UFO investigations. Doty was complicit in the emotional 
			and psychological breakdown of Paul Bennewitz who had befriended and 
			trusted Doty who was
			
			disseminating disinformation to discredit 
			Bennewitz. 
			  
			Furthermore, Howe witnessed a proposed 
			HBO special on UFOs cancelled due to delays in the release of 
			historical film footage that Doty assured Howe was forthcoming. Doty 
			has publicly said that he regrets the actions he performed, but 
			pointed out in his defense that he was under orders and was simply 
			doing his job.  
			  
			In Exempt from Disclosure, he describes the nature of 
			his work as follows:  
				
				"I was also briefed into another very special 
			(third) program that dealt with safe guarding the Air Force’s high 
			technology programs. Among the methods used to safeguard these 
			programs was "disinformation" (p. 70)."  
			Consequently, Doty has 
			verified that the US Air Force disseminates disinformation to UFO 
			researchers who get too close to the truth behind UFOs, and that he 
			actively played a role in this. 
 In Exempt from Disclosure, Doty states that he disagrees with the 
			official secrecy policy and that he believes the public has a right 
			to know. Presumably, he is now disseminating the kind of UFO 
			information that it was earlier his job to discredit through 
			officially sanctioned ’deception programs’ when serving in AFOSI. 
			The obvious question is whether a former intelligence agent who 
			actively participated in ’deception programs’ during his military 
			service, continues such a role in private life?
 
			  
			More to the point is Doty contributing 
			to a new deception program in the form of Project Serpo, or 
			is he releasing information in accord with his conscience?  
			  
			The fact 
			that Exempt from Disclosure was published in 2005, shortly before 
			the release of the Project Serpo material in November 2005, 
			points to a synchronicity that may be entirely fortuitous or part of 
			a scheduled release of information that is part of ’deception 
			program".  
			  
			Doty describes an officially sanctioned ’deception 
			program’ as follows: 
				
				The government can keep a secret this long by a number of means. One 
			being, compartmenting the data within the government, or the 
			intelligence community, or they can run deception operations, 
			deceiving the public, or deceiving private UFO groups.  
				  
				They present 
			the groups with faulty information, unbelievable data, which in 
			turn, the groups publish, and are then ridiculed. That misinforms 
			the public, and keeps the government information compartmentalized 
			and protected (p. 86).  
			In his statement to UFO Magazine, 
			Doty mentions a Colonel Jack 
			Casey, a retired Air Force Intelligence Officer.  
			  
			Doty claims that Casey personally 
			confirmed the Project Serpo information concerning an alien exchange 
			program. Casey claimed that in, 
				
				"1965, twelve U.S. military men were 
			placed on an extraterrestrial spacecraft and flew to an alien planet 
			some 40 light years away."  
			Casey further claimed that the briefing 
			provided by the eight personnel who returned in 1978 is still 
			classified, and that all are currently dead. Here Doty is relating 
			hearsay testimony which he did not personally learn from direct 
			experiences or classified documents. 
 Much of the information released by Doty in Exempt from Disclosure 
			and his statement to UFO Magazine are based on direct personal 
			experiences of ’flying saucers’, EBEs or classified briefing 
			documents. This body of claims needs to be seriously considered 
			given Doty’s documented background as an AFOSI special agent 
			responsible for UFO investigations.
 
			  
			At the same time, there are many 
			claims based on second or third party stories which are hearsay and 
			require independent corroboration before accepting. These latter 
			claims could be part of an ’acclimation program’ based on plausible 
			deniability. Alternatively, these claims based on hearsay could part 
			of a deception program that is occurring since the latter 
			individuals are not able or willing to come forward to publicly 
			confirm their testimonies. 
 A significant fact concerning Richard Doty and his recent emergence 
			is that he at no time has reported any harassment, intimidation or 
			threats as a consequence of his revelations.
 
			  
			This is quite 
			remarkable given that he is revealing highly classified compartment 
			information on topics that appear far more sensitive than released 
			by other whistleblowers who report having been threatened for their 
			revelations.  
			  
			For instance, John Maynard, a former Defense 
			Intelligence Agency analyst, has reported a number of threats for 
			releasing far less information that what Doty has revealed about 
			compartmented programs involving EBEs (http://www.surfingtheapocalypse.com/maynard.html). 
			This suggests that Doty has gained a ’green light’ to come forward 
			with his testimony in a possible effort to ’acclimate’ the public 
			for future disclosure of the extraterrestrial presence. 
 Due, however, to Doty’s former career in AFOSI and professional 
			involvement in ’deception programs’, it is also possible that Doty 
			is participating in an elaborate deception program with his claims 
			that give remarkable support to the Project Serpo material. 
			Something that is suggestive of such a possibility is his 
			repudiation of some passages he authored in Exempt from Disclosure 
			describing his face to face meeting with EBE-2. In a later 
			’clarification’, Doty claimed that he viewed the alleged meeting 
			involving EBE-2 on a video screen and was not in the same room after 
			all: (see
			
			Serpo/Consistencies)
 
			  
			This turn around where Doty makes some 
			astounding claims regarding his EBE related experiences, approves 
			the publication of this in print, and then repudiates some important 
			details, suggests his testimony is unreliable. Doty may therefore be 
			participating in a deception program.  
			  
			Nevertheless, given the first 
			hand experiences Doty has revealed, and his former career which is 
			well documented, it is very important to seriously consider what he 
			personally claims to have experienced or read in terms of classified 
			information.  
			  
			Consequently, it can be concluded that Doty’s written 
			testimony of what he saw and read concerning classified UFO/EBE 
			related projects is plausible though his tendency to repudiate 
			critical details makes him unreliable. Furthermore, his claims, 
			based on what he was told by other military personnel, need to be 
			regarded as hearsay and not sufficient to corroborate the Project Serpo material. 
 A third possibility that Doty is a genuine whistleblower following 
			his conscience in the release of classified information is extremely 
			unlikely in the author’s view. Doty’s military history, the quality 
			of the information he has released, his ability to escape any form 
			of harassment, and repudiating key details of earlier statements, 
			suggest that he is participating either in an officially sanctioned 
			’acclimation program’ or a ’deception program’.
 
			  
			Consequently, I will 
			focus on these latter two possibilities with regard to the Serpo 
			project and Doty’s role in it. It is now worth examining the 
			testimonies of some of the other main players in the unfolding Serpo 
			information. 
 Two prominent insiders involved in confirming the Serpo story, and 
			who are most often cited are Gene Lakes (aka Gene Loscowski) and 
			Paul McGovern. Lakes worked for the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) 
			from 1964-1996, and was an investigator for DIA and then director of 
			security operations.
 
			(see
			
			http://www.ufoconspiracy.com/reports/tom_mack_groomlake.htm ).
			 
			  
			According to Doty’s statement, Paul 
			McGovern was a "former security chief for the Defense Intelligence 
			Agency". Both Lakes and McGovern claim to have had access to a 
			briefing document titled "Project Serpo" that discussed the alien 
			exchange program during their respective military careers. Indeed, 
			McGovern supplies the classification number of the briefing document 
			that they had access to (see
			
			Serpo/Information#1).  
			  
			Since both 
			McGovern and Lakes claim to have gained their information from the 
			alleged briefing document, then this is important evidence 
			supporting the existence of the Serpo project.  
			  
			After reflecting on 
			the initial email from Anonymous describing Project Serpo, 
			Lakes/Loscowski 
			wrote:  
				
				Most of the information is 
				absolutely correct… To the best of my knowledge, we had 12 men, 
				all military men. Eight USAF, two Army and two Navy guys. I 
				think the females are a red herring. But maybe I just didn’t 
				have the clearance for that.… 
				  
				Only eight came back, that much is 
			right. Two died a few years into their assignment on the Visitor’s 
			planet. Two others decided to remain and maybe are still alive 
			today. Since their return, all have died. (see
				
				Serpo/Information#1) 
			McGovern responded in a similar manner:  
				
				Interesting but not totally correct 
				[commenting on Anonymous’s original e-mail].… As for the 
				exchange program: Unauthorized Release of Classified 
				Information, as I see it. But maybe someone currently within our 
				government wants it out. No females were sent. Twelve men, all 
				military. 8 USAF, 2 U.S. Army and 2 U.S. Navy.  
				  
				Two were doctors; 
				three were scientists; two were language specialists; two were 
				security personnel; two were pilots and one was the leader 
				(Colonel-AF) (see
				
				Serpo/Information#1). 
			Both McGovern and Lakes confirm vital 
			aspects of the program such as it involving twelve male military 
			personnel who traveled to Planet Serpo, lived on Serpo for over a 
			decade, and only eight of whom returned to Earth. 
 Along with Doty, McGovern and Lakes are the only individuals who 
			have come forward to publicly confirm the truth of Project Serpo in 
			terms of what they read in classified briefing documents. In 
			addition there is the hearsay testimony of three others who claim to 
			have learned about Project Serpo through classified documents, one 
			is Doty’s Colonel Casey who confirmed the Serpo case with Richard 
			Doty. Another is an anonymous retired Colonel of 30 years service 
			who revealed to a serving Lt Col, known only to Bill Ryan [webmaster 
			of the Project Serpo website], that the Project Serpo information is 
			true.
 
			  
			The third is Ed Doty who allegedly 
			confirmed various aspects of the Project Serpo story. So far, none 
			of these individuals have or are able to come forward to publicly 
			confirm what has been ascribed to them or to answer questions. In 
			addition, to these insiders, there are also the claims attributed to 
			researchers such as Whitley Strieber and Linda Moulton Howe, both of 
			whom heard hearsay testimony confirming various aspects of Project Serpo. 
 Finally, there are the two or three DIA anonymous sources 
			responsible for the initial disclosures of Project Serpo. All remain 
			anonymous and their credentials and credibility cannot be checked. 
			Consequently, the strongest support for the Project Serpo story come 
			from the three individuals who have publicly stated that they 
			learned about it through classified briefing documents: Doty, 
			McGovern and Lakes.
 
			  
			All three are former intelligence officials, as 
			are the three others whose hearsay testimony has been attributed to 
			them: Doty’s Col Casey, Ryan’s anonymous Col, and Ed Doty. 
			Consequently, it is possible to conclude that all may have been 
			co-opted into a covert ’acclimation program’ or ’deception program’.
			
 My overall conclusion is that Doty’s statement to UFO Magazine gives 
			the Project Serpo information a boost insofar as he confirms the 
			core story of an alien exchange program that was described in a 
			classified briefing document.
 
			  
			Doty’s documented involvement in UFO 
			investigations makes his testimony significant, although his ability 
			to repudiate statements he has authored does give some concern about 
			the reliability of his testimony. Project Serpo is also supported in 
			the testimonies of McGovern and Lakes who apparently also learned of 
			it through classified briefing documents. 
			  
			Nevertheless, their 
			respective careers with the DIA and the DIA affiliations of the 
			two/three anonymous sources responsible for the Project Serpo 
			information does raise the possibility that they are part of a DIA 
			orchestrated deception program. 
 Despite support for the core story of Serpo from three former 
			insiders who have publicly emerged to confirm its truth based on 
			classified briefing documents, there are many questionable details 
			that raise considerable doubt of the veracity of the Project Serpo 
			material. Details such as alleged flight logs, scientific 
			information about Serpo and its binary star system that involves 
			numerous inconsistencies, the anonymous nature of the leaked 
			information and other inconsistencies, has raised much skepticism of 
			the Project Serpo material.
 
			  
			For example, in my own analysis of the 
			alleged flight logs detailing alleged communications between the 
			EBEs and the human team I found a number of anomalies that suggest 
			the logs are fictitious. (see
			
			
			http://groups.yahoo.com/group/exopolitics/message/274 ).
			 
			  
			Given the number of insiders who have 
			come forward to support Serpo and/or communicated anonymously with 
			researchers to confirm Project Serpo, this is a story that has the 
			potential to either ’inform’ or ’disinform’ a great number of people 
			about covert government projects involving EBEs. In short, Project Serpo may be an 
			officially sanctioned acclimation program or 
			deception program orchestrated by the DIA.  
			  
			A third possibility is that Project Serpo is 
			both an acclimation program designed to partially inform us 
			about an alleged alien exchange program, while sowing disinformation 
			that can mislead UFO/exopolitics researchers and the general public 
			that support the ongoing disclosures concerning an alleged Planet Serpo that briefly housed 12 military personnel from 1965 to 1978 in 
			an EBE exchange program. 
			
 
			  |