
	by Mark Vorpahl
	
	July 19, 2010
	from 
	GlobalResearch Website
	
	 
	
		
			| 
	Mark Vorpahl is a union steward as well as an anti-war and Latin American 
	Solidarity activist. He can be reached at Portland@workerscompass.org.
	 | 
	
	
	 
	
	 Nestled between Panama to its south and Nicaragua to its north, Costa Rica 
	is a Central American nation roughly the size of Rhode Island.
	
	If another nation were to send Rhode Island a force of 7,000 troops, 200 
	helicopters, and 46 warships in an effort to eradicate drug trafficking, it 
	is doubtful that the residents of Rhode Island would consider this offer 
	"on-the-level." Such a massive military force could hardly be efficiently 
	used to combat drug cartels. 
	
	
	 
	
	The only logical conclusion is that the nation 
	whose troops now are occupying this other country had another agenda in mind 
	that it didn't want to share.
	
	In early July, by a vote of 31 to 8, the Costa Rican Congress approved the 
	U.S. bringing into their nation the same military force described above, 
	justified with the same dubious "war on drugs" rationale. According to the 
	agreement, the military forces are supposed to leave Costa Rica by the end 
	of 2010. 
	
	
	 
	
	This begs the question, however, if such an over the top display of 
	military muscle is needed now to combat the drug cartels, what will be done 
	in the next few months to make their presence unnecessary?
	
	
	 
	
	The history of 
	such U.S. military deployments around the world suggests a more credible 
	outcome than what the agreement states. Once the U.S. moves such massive 
	forces into a country, they rarely move them out.
	
	When push comes to shove, the political machinery in Costa Rica is 
	subservient to U.S. government and corporate interests. Nevertheless, there 
	are many in Costa Rica who are declaring that the agreement is a violation 
	of their national sovereignty and is unconstitutional. (In 1948 Costa Rica 
	abolished its army, which was sanctioned in its constitution.)
	
	
	 
	
	Legislator 
	Luis Fishman has vowed to challenge the decision of the Congress in the 
	courts.
	 
	
	 
	
	
	
	Shifting Strategy and Tactics
	
	The buildup of U.S. armed forces in Costa Rica is part of an escalating 
	pattern that indicates a shifting of strategy and tactics for the U.S. in 
	controlling what the Monroe Doctrine infamously described as the U.S.'s 
	"backyard" - that is, all of Latin America. 
	
	
	 
	
	Since the U.S. government 
	inspired covert coup d’etats and political reversals of popular governments 
	and/or movements in Guatemala, Brazil, Chile, Nicaragua, and El Salvador in 
	previous decades, U.S. rulers had figured they had things stitched up to 
	their liking in Latin America. The political elites in Latin America were 
	uniformly in the pockets of the U.S. corporate empire and appeared to be 
	more or less in control of their people. 
	
	
	 
	
	They commonly outlawed strikes and 
	at times even trade unions, eliminated minimum wage laws, and gave enormous 
	tax breaks to U.S. corporations.
	
	Therefore, the U.S. Empire builders could use their political and economic 
	might alone to subjugate these neo-colonies to a very profitable neoliberal 
	agenda. This agenda included allowing U.S. corporations easy access to 
	pillage these nations’ public sectors through privatization, letting 
	multi-national corporations overrun these nations’ local markets and farms 
	through the elimination of trade barriers, and increasing the exploitation 
	of their workers and the devastation of their natural resources by tossing 
	out national labor and environmental standards.
	
	
	 
	
	Because of the profits 
	enjoyed by a few as a result of these measures, they carried the day, though 
	they, in turn, created a simmering spirit of rebellion in the semi-colonies' 
	peasantry and workers that would inevitably find expression.
	
	As the U.S. began to set its sights on and send its resources to other parts 
	of the world, most notably the Middle East and Asia, the web they had 
	wrapped around Latin America began to unravel. This was most apparent in 
	Venezuela where a U.S.-backed coup attempt in April of 2002 failed because 
	of the massive mobilizing of the Venezuelan people in defense of their 
	democratic rights. 
	
	
	 
	
	All subsequent attempts of the Venezuelan oligarchy, in 
	collusion with the U.S. State Department, to get rid of Chavez resulted in 
	their humiliation because of the constant support and organizing of the 
	country’s lower classes. It became apparent to the U.S. ruling class that 
	they could no longer rely on the Venezuelan oligarchy, which had lost direct 
	control over the political situation.
	
	
	 
	
	What is more, the popular upsurge 
	witnessed in Venezuela in the past decade, opened up floodgates for 
	anti-imperialist organizing across the continent, resulting in the election 
	of a number of left-wing presidents.
	
	Not only was the neoliberal agenda of the U.S. being blocked, an alternative 
	to the U.S. Free Trade policies was being set up. The Bolivarian Alternative 
	for Latin America and the Caribbean (ALBA), which was initiated by Venezuela 
	and Cuba, began to build a trading block based on exchange according to 
	different nations' needs rather than U.S. corporate profits.
	
	
	 
	
	While ALBA 
	needs to be more substantially developed in order to fulfill its promise, 
	especially in regards to organizing grassroots control to determine its 
	priorities, it is a challenge to U.S. corporate and political dominance in 
	the region.
	 
	
	 
	
	
	
	U.S. Military Moves
	
	As a result, the U.S. government began to shift its reliance from solely 
	economic and political means to control Latin America towards taking 
	military measures, even while engaged in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. 
	
	
	 
	
	What 
	have been some of these measures?
	
		
			- 
			
			In 2006 the U.S. conducted military exercises off the coast of Venezuela 
	called "Operation Partnership of the Americas." This exercise involved four 
	ships, 60 fighter planes, and 6,500 U.S. troops.
 
 
- 
			
			In 2006 the U.S. State Department classified the islands of Aruba, Bonaire, 
	and Curacao, with their military bases jointly contracted to Holland and the 
	U.S., as "The Third Frontier of the United States." U.S. aircraft carriers, 
	war ships, combat planes, Black Hawk helicopters, nuclear submarines, and 
	thousands of troops began to build up in Curacao in particular. In 2009 a 
	U.S. military plane was intercepted in Venezuelan airspace that had flown 
	from Curacao's base.
 
 
- 
			
			In 2008 the U.S. reactivated the Fourth Fleet to patrol Caribbean waters. 
	This fleet had been out of commission since 1950. Now it operates with the 
	potential of acting as a floating base for the U.S. to conduct military 
	strikes throughout Central and South America.
 
 
- 
			
			In 2009 the U.S. made a deal with Colombia to build up its military personal 
	in seven bases, from 250 to 800 American troops with 600 civilian 
	contractors, effectively taking control over these installations. This was 
	widely denounced throughout Latin America as an action aimed at intimidating 
	Venezuela. In December of that year a U.S. drone plane flying from one of 
	these Colombian bases violated Venezuelan airspace.
 
 
- 
			
			From 2009 to 2010 the U.S. worked behind the scenes to legitimize a military 
	coup in Honduras against lawfully elected President Zelaya, who had aligned 
	the nation with ALBA. Part of the U.S.'s motivation behind its actions was 
	to maintain control of Soto Cano's Airbase, with its 550 U.S. troops and 650 
	U.S. and Honduran civilians. In the 1980's the U.S. had used this base for a 
	training ground and launching pad for the Contra terrorists in Nicaragua and 
	El Salvadorian death squads opposed to the Farabundo Marti National 
	Liberation Front (FMLN). There is good reason for concern that this Airbase 
	will again be used for similar operations today.
 
 
- 
			
			In 2009 the U.S. and Panama agreed to open up two naval bases in Panama, 
	which will be the first time U.S. military forces will be based in this 
	nation since 1999. 
	
	
	 
	
	War on Drugs?
	
	
	Most of these measures have been justified on the grounds of combating drug 
	trafficking, including the military buildup in Costa Rica. 
	
	
	 
	
	However, they 
	have not curtailed this problem at all. Such U.S. military buildups have 
	generally been accompanied by an increase in drug trafficking, as has 
	happened in both Columbia and Afghanistan. Based on this record it can only 
	be concluded that the "War on Drugs" rationale is a red herring for public 
	relations consumption, not the actual motivation.
	
	This military build up in Costa Rica is the latest in a series of moves the 
	U.S. has made in Latin America that seeks to use threats and arms to reverse 
	the strength of popular anti-imperialist forces across the region. The U.S. 
	is playing with the possibility of erupting a continental conflagration for 
	the sake of corporate profits.
	
	While it is doubtful that the U.S. wants to directly engage in a military 
	conflict with, most likely, Venezuela right now, preparations for this 
	possibility are being made. 
	
	
	 
	
	What is more likely in the short term is that 
	the U.S. military will use its forces to engage in sabotage and intimidation 
	in hopes of reversing support for the nations aligned with ALBA. It is also 
	very possible that the U.S. military will help to support proxy armies, such 
	as Colombia's, in military conflicts that align with U.S. interests. 
	However, this is a dangerous game.
	
	
	 
	
	Even in the short term, the U.S. ruling 
	class may drag the nation into another direct conflict, in spite of their 
	intentions, that could spread to involve numerous other nations.
	 
	
	 
	
	
	
	Peace and International Solidarity
	
	
	While U.S. workers are suffering from unemployment, insufficient health 
	care, drastic cuts to education and social services, as well as 
	
	environmental catastrophe in the Gulf of Mexico created by the
	Obama 
	governmental collusion with BP, the priorities of the U.S. ruling class are 
	elsewhere. 
	
	
	 
	
	They are more concerned with pouring money into military buildups 
	that threaten war. 
	
	
	 
	
	The target of such a war or wars would be the popular 
	working class movements in Latin America, whose only crime has been to 
	struggle to liberate themselves from super exploitation and political 
	repression. It is the same economic and political elite in the U.S. that are 
	denying U.S. workers what is rightfully theirs that are opposing the efforts 
	of workers and peasants throughout the continent to empower themselves.
	
	It is the task of the anti-war movement not only to oppose the wars in Iraq 
	and Afghanistan, but also to prevent future U.S. wars in Latin America. 
	Wherever anti-war activists seek to mobilize people against war, they should 
	also seek to educate about the U.S. empire's military moves in Latin 
	America.
	
	Furthermore, it will require international solidarity to combat what the 
	U.S. elite is doing in Central and South America. There was recently an 
	event that could go some way towards preparing this solidarity. 
	
	
	 
	
	In Sanare, 
	Venezuela, from June 21-25, a series of meetings were held entitled 
	"Encuentro of the Americas: Resisting Militarization and Promoting a Culture 
	of Peace." 
	
	
	 
	
	It consisted of delegates of organizations from 19 nations across 
	the continent, including School of the Americas (SOA) Watch of the U.S. 
	
	
	 
	
	You 
	can read more about this at 
	http://www.soaw.org/